Is Ted Cruz Eligible for the Presidency

Ted Cruz Analysis
Interpreting The Constitution: Is Ted Cruz Eligible for Presidency?
Is Ted Cruz American enough for the presidency? Recently Donald Trump has made claims that Ted
Cruz is not eligible for presidency. Cruz was born in Canada by a father who is Cuban and a mother
who is a natural born U.S. Citizen. This debate will escalate the closer we get to the primaries.
Jonathan H. Adler is a writer from The Washington Post. in his article titled "Yes, Ted Cruz is a
'Natural Born Citizen' he argues that Cruz is in fact eligible. He explains that Cruz was born in
Canada; however, his mother's residency makes him a U.S. citizen. They further explain that the
constitution does not mean U.S. Soil when it says "natural born." Adler is right; Ted Cruz is eligible
for presidency because of his mother's U.S. Citizenship.
Adler says that Cruz is indeed eligible because of his mother's residency status.
His father is a U.S. Citizen; however, he is not a natural born citizen. This makes Cruz a natural
born citizen; his mother's status transfers to him. He explains that if children are born on foreign soil
they still ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Cruz is a natural born citizen, because his Mother is a natural born citizen. Even if his mother was
not a U.S. Naturally born citizen, he should still be legal as long as she had citizenship. Some say
that children that are born north of the United States–Mexico border are considered natural born
citizens. yet a child born south of the border, even by a few miles, by legal U.S. Citizens is
considered to be not a natural born citizen. That is not logical reasoning. I do understand why some
would think that people's allegiance lays in their birthplace, but for Cruz to renounce his Canadian
residency shows me that he's an American. The people who argue against Cruz's nationality are the
same who argued against President Obama's birthplace. Even if President Obama was born in Africa
he still is considered a natural born citizen because of his mother's
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Essay On Immigration Reform
Every year millions of immigrants flood into the United State, be they legal or not. We must start
allowing a natural path to citizenship for the sake of our economy and the foundation of our country.
Otherwise we may border on the edge of loosing everything we as a nation hold dear. Many
opponents to immigration reform think that the impact of having more legalized residents could
drain the nation's resources. This, however, is false. It is estimated that 20 million illegal immigrants
are already here. According to the Alex Nowrasteh, an immigration specialist, "the United States
can't find workers needed to fulfill work demands." With these new workers those empty positions
could be filled, and taxed. Which, over the next 10 years, could ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
This is what happens to natural born citizens whose parents are illegal immigrants. The opposition
thinks that if the illegal immigrants are granted citizenship that it may be conceived as rewarding
them and instead would do just that. For the people that were born here in the United States whose
parents weren't here legally, that is exactly what this would mean. Being as we cannot hold them
accountable for the actions of their parents, as they had no control over it, it would be irrational and
immoral to forcibly remove them. According to the 14th Amendment of the Constitution of the
United States, a natural born citizen is defined as "All person born or naturalized in the United
States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State
wherein they reside." The opposition argues that by allowing the new immigrants to vote would
offset the votes to grossly favor one political party more than the other. However, this also, is false.
According to NBC, "With a few exceptions, the brain trusts of both parties see it in their interest to
create some kind of path to citizenship." If both parties see it in their interest then why would it
unbalance the system? Because, majority of the votes against it will still be from Republicans, and
they fear that this would cause retaliation against them. However, the only form of "retaliation"
could be from not getting reelected, considering this is a majority vote, this is

Natural Rights In The United States
According to University of Notre Dame History Professor, Leo Strauss, he has stated, "Natural right
claims to be a right that is discernible by human reason and is universally acknowledged". (Leo)
This statement opens up the question, what exactly is a natural right and who has access to such?
Society has not been able to decide which rights man possessed as a gift from God. To define a
natural right, already defined by Professor Strauss as, "equal to of all individuals born in the United
States and cannot be taken away". (Leo) The term natural rights was first introduced in the
American society by a fellow named John Locke and he argued, "Man was entitled to enjoy the
rights of life, liberty and property" (Leo). There has been a constitutional dilemmas between which
natural rights are God–given. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Especially, if it the betters the lives of American citizens lives. The USA has no legal protection for
free college tuition. The United States is a developed country with the means to offer this innate
right to its citizens. Most of Europe, countries like Spain, Sweden, and Germany, as explained by
Higher Education Research Institution, "guarantees the right to education" (Brennan). This has
affected their economy, provided relentless opportunities and advantages such as self–sufficient
citizens who bring investment and entrepreneurship opportunities (Brennan). Currently in the United
States, Kindergarten through 12th grade, or equivalent to 18 years old, is an innate right in America.
( ) Once these people meet the age of 18 or 12th grade, Americans are no longer provided a free
education. It is simply unjust and creates a clear transparency of class division in the United States.
The system permits the wealthy to pursue a college education while the impoverished are kept in a
continuous, poverty cycle. This conundrum burdens the affluent citizen's taxes, which creates
hostility between the wealthy and impoverished

The Role Of Birthright Citizenship In The United States
5.1 million of the 73.1 million minors living the United States currently live with their illegal
immigrant parents. The minors are legal American citizens as the 14th Amendment of the
Constitution grants citizenship to children born in America, regardless if their parents illegally
immigrated to the U.S. or not.. Donald Trump, the 2016 Republican presidential candidate, has
proposed taking away birthright citizenship from illegal immigrants' children. By doing this it could
reduce the amount of immigrants coming to our country and reduce some government debt. In
addition, birthright citizenship is not a natural law. We the people voted on putting the 14th
amendment into place, which in turn gives not only us, but illegal immigrants children citizenship,
just for being born in America.

Birthright Naturalization Essay
Kevin Killian
Political Science 1100
Dr. Kuehls
14th Amendment and the Issues of Birthright Naturalization For many years immigration has been a
sensitive topic within the United States, and one could argue that within the last 5 years it has
become a popular debate between both of its major political parties. Naturalization by birth has
become something of a "heated" topic within the parameters of immigration in politics since the
starting of the 2016 presidential debates. The first line of the opening statement in the Fourteenth
amendment states: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the
jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside." It is the
intent of this ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
citizenship more "valuable", deterring unauthorized migration, and reducing chain migration.
Changing the Birthright clause to include solely the children of naturalized citizens, will ensure that
after the correct processes, those who truly desire the right to all of the freedoms that the United
States offers, will strive to receive American citizenship. If a legal alien opts to remain a non–citizen
but stays as a legal permanent resident any children born and raised by them in the U.S. can make
the decision for themselves once eligible whether or not they wish to become naturalized citizens.
In a journal article by Alex Street on the issue of birth naturalization in Germany, he points out that
parents are prone to naturalize while their children are young, in order to ensure that their children
grow up as citizens of the country of residence. He continues by pointing out that "By granting
citizenship to many children born in Germany to immigrant parents, the introduction of jus soli
(citizenship by birth) removed this "intergenerational" incentive for parents to naturalize."(Street
Nov. 2015) If it someone truly wishes to live the "American Dream" and ensure that for their
children, why not show their children the importance of this concept by becoming an American and
living the dream

Argumentative Essay On Immigration Rights
Immigration rights and importance is one of the United States' biggest issues. Many believe that
legal immigrants are treated as normal citizens. But they are not. Law enforcement breaks laws and
are unconstitutional. Also, the government believes that immigrants take resources and are a danger
to society. But is all of this true. Do immigrants take or provide resources? Do immigrants get as
equal treatment as natural born citizens? I believe that immigrants provide more resources than they
take. Also I believe that they do not get the same treatment as natural born citizens. The common
good of immigrants and immigration is that they give our economy a boost and immigrants help
work forces. Also, if the immigrant is legal shouldn't they have the same individual rights as a
natural born citizen. This issue is important because it is one of the biggest debates in the United
States today.
So what is immigration? Immigration is defined as "the travel into a country for the purpose of
permanent ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Bolanos and Mr. Cardenas were working. ICE was not invited into the place of work and did not
have a warrant, but they still entered the house. This violating the Fourth Amendment of the Bill of
Rights. Mr.Cardenas even pointed out that they were breaking the law, they did not care. ICE
entered the house with suspicion of Mr. Bolanos, who is a legal immigrant, being illegal. They
arrested Mr.Bolanos, without notifying him of why he was being arrested. This is a violation of the
Sixth Amendment of the Bill of Rights. ICE was forced to release this man, because they arrested
him without notifying him why and they entered the house without a warrant or welcoming. (New
York TImes) So how is this fair? A legal immigrant who is just trying to make a living and have a
good life, was deprived of his rights. This is not fair at all. All immigrants should have equal rights
as natural born

Essay about Difficulty of Immigration in the 1900's...
When most people think about immigration to the United States, they think of the U.S. as being the
"land of opportunity," where they will be able to make all of their dreams come true. For some
people, immigration made their lives richer and more fulfilled. This however, was not always the
case. A place that is supposed to be a "Golden Land" (Marcus 116) did not always welcome people
with open arms. Even after people became legal citizens of the United States, often times the natural
born Americans did not treat the immigrants as equals but rather as outsiders who were beneath
them in some way. In some situations, people's lives were made worse by coming to the "land of
opportunity." Often times people were living no better than they ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Along the same lines, both Jose Luis and Rosa would do anything to become American citizens
even though their daily lives were so amazingly hard. They would have to cross a river to get to and
from work everyday and barely make enough money to pay for lunch and transportation, let alone
pay for food for their four children and rent for their apartment. I am sure that when they thought
about moving to the United States they believed that their lives would get easier and not harder, but
unfortunately that was not the case. They went through their daily lives, struggling in hopes one day
that their children would get good jobs and could have happy and successful futures. What is also
interesting is the fact that Rosa says, " We would be honored if they are chosen to serve. We would
be very proud of our children for doing their duty for their country" (Marcus 313–314). The fact that
neither Rosa, nor her children were even legal citizens of the United States and yet she would be
proud of her children serving "their" country shows just how much she wants her family to become
U.S. citizens. Another major hardship that was faced by most immigrants was the way that they
were treated. Often times they were treated like second–class citizens and were thought to be
inferior to the natural born citizens. They also seemed to only be able to hold jobs that no one else
really wanted to do, for very low wages. Most of the time people would

Changes In The 15th Amendment
I feel that the changes made in the 15th Amendment, which gave all citizens the right to vote
regardless of race or color, and the 19th Amendment which gave women the right to vote improved
our government, because after those amendments citizens who previously would not have had a
chance to vote, now could. The opinions of those citizens could now be expressed through their
votes thereby expanding the demographic of the United States democracy.
The natural born Citizen clause in Article 2, Section 1 of the United States Constitution has caused
much controversy and its meaning has been deeply argued. It may be in our best interest if the
clause were to be reworded to make the meaning of the clause clear so there can be no
discrepancies, ending

Age Of Enlightenment
During the 18th century, a worldwide movement, more commonly recognized as the Age of
Enlightenment, encouraged the spread of philosophical thinking, science, communications, and
politics. This movement gradually branched out from Northern Europe and reached places such as
the United States of America and France, encouraging the American and French Revolutions. The
Enlightenment brought about a new age of philosophical and intellectual thinkers, such as John
Locke, which helped shape and influence modern government and politics. John Locke is
recognized as the father of classical liberalism, introducing the Two Treatises of Government, Social
Contract, and private property, which formed the basis for the constitutions in westernized ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
America's Declaration of Independence.) Natural rights became the staple of Locke's political
philosophy. Locke believed that an individual was born with the right and duty to their own life,
including their property. His idea based off of natural rights has become what he is most commonly
recognized for in politics. Much like Locke's belief in natural rights, he also believed in the social
contract theory. The social contract theory is the agreement among people in a society to cooperate
in order to receive social benefits. The government could only be a legitimate government with the
consent of the people that it governs, along with their agreement to obey its laws (Thompson, Bruce
E.R. "social contract theory.") If the citizens obey the rules of its government, then the government
should protect their natural rights such as their freedom of speech, equality, and property. Locke's
social contract theory became one of the ideas that capital punishment was founded off of, however,
he was not the only enlightened thinker to have this theory. Both John Locke and Thomas Hobbes
believed in the social contract theory, but they had conflicting ideas. Hobbes believed in an absolute
monarchy, a form of government in which Locke was greatly opposed to, and that the people must
obey the law, but trying to overthrow their king would be a violation of the contract. In contrast to
Locke, who believed that the citizens have the right to rebel against its government if they

Birthright of Citizenship
The Birthright Citizenship Amendment is one that has caused controversy. Should a person that is
born in the US, regardless of whether the parents were here temporarily, or illegally be considered
an American citizen? The 14th Amendment states "All persons born or naturalized in the United
States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the States
wherein they reside", ( Spalding, 2010). The interpretation of this amendment has caused the
controversy. Those opposed to ending the clause in the Birthright Citizenship Amendment argue
"The framers' intent was to create an objective basis for establishing citizenship–birth–not a
subjective standard left to the whim of a majority. The United ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
It contrasts with citizenship acquired in other ways, for example by naturalization later in life.
Birthright citizenship may be conferred by jus soli or jus sanguinis. Under United States law, any
person born within the United States (including the territories of Puerto Rico, Guam, the U.S. Virgin
Islands, and the Northern Mariana Islands)[1] and subject to its jurisdiction is automatically granted
U.S. citizenship,[2] as are many (though not all) children born to American citizens overseas.
(Spaulding, 2010).
Those opposed to ending the clause in the Birthright Citizenship Amendment will argue that... "The
framers' intent was to create an objective basis for establishing citizenship–birth–not a subjective
standard left to the whim of a majority. The United States has, for that reason, never struggled like
other nations to integrate those born here" (Fitz, 2010). The thought process here is that those born
natural citizens of the US from alien parents will always carry the stigma of having been the
children of aliens. This could cause more undue injustice towards these people than the founding
fathers wanted. After all, they were all alien to this soil.
The opponents to this clause, they felt that "It

Should America Be An All-Born Citizen Essay
Should the United States of America be an All–American born country? Should all citizens be born
citizens? These are the questions we have been asking ourselves for centuries here in the States.
Whether we agree with the illegal immigrants coming into this country or not, it will always be an
issue. It is unquestionable that we the people need expand our thoughts and prepare a plan for
America and these new coming and already here immigrants. America should allow non criminal
immigrants to have the opportunity to become citizens.
These "aliens" increase crime rates in the US. Many people argue this without knowing the actual
statistics on the claim. Immigrants have lower crime rates than native–born and natural–born
citizens. A ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
As of now America has employed a tremendous amount of undocumented immigrants, over 8.4
million. These immigrants make up only 3.7 percent of the US population, but yet represent 5.2
percent in the US labor force. Also the agricultural workforce is dependent of these undocumented
immigrants. Studies have shown that at least 6 out of 10 farm workers are undocumented. A recent
survey shows that 78 percent of the agricultural workers are foreign–born and in order to get here,
had to cross a border.
Why deport "aliens" if it's cost is high and they can improve the economy by staying in the states.
Recent studies prove my statement. The United States spends more on deportation and border patrol
than annual gross domestic product of 80 countries. As of now the United States spends $3.5 billion
more on border enforcement than they spend on law enforcement in their country. This comes down
to $18 billion each year. If all undocumented immigrants were to be deported or chose "self–
deportation" the US's GDP would get a massive hit with a loss of $2.6 trillion. If America decides to
remove all the immigrant it would cost a breathtaking amount of $285 billion, If I place a
perspective on it that is more understandable, that money could be used to hire one million new
teachers and pay them for five total years, it's

Moral Stereotypes
Even though many cultures have the same basic moral codes, but the defined codes differ from place
to place, so therefore the American citizens need to teach them the right way to act and think.
However teaching aliens the moral code of the North was not the only thing that the national
residents wanted to do. Therefore they wanted them to also be patriotic of the United States not the
aliens' original place of nationality. Through this process, they wanted to make sure that the
immigrants were loyal to the United States and they wanted them to conform to society's standards.
However these strategies were not the only ones they imposed to tried to solve their "problem" that
were supposed to advance their effect. The residents tried to teach

The Declaration Of Independence And The Constitution
By far, one of the greatest achievements of humanity as a whole has been the development of
democracy. This idea sprouted with the growth of history's most successful and innovative
civilizations; the Greeks and the Romans. Their enormous populations called for a fair and just way
of governing. Why not allow control to stem from the populations own members? This logical way
of thought is still evident in the world today, especially in the democracy of the United States of
America. Upon examination of America's most valuable texts, the Declaration of Independence and
the Constitution, it becomes very evident that many of these modern ideas can be traced back in
time to the beliefs of the Greeks and Romans. The principles of democracy were very successful
within these ancient societies, as they are successful within America today. One of the biggest steps
in building the democracy that America has to this day began with the Declaration of Independence.
Democracy is the idea that consent comes from the governed and this is blatantly seen through text
within the Declaration. "...That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men,
deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed." (Declaration of Independence.) This
idea was borrowed from the Ancient Romans who had a republic form of government. Republic
directly means that political authority comes from the people! In roman history the citizens were
largely the source of the law. Roman law was

The Debate 24: Becoming President: Natural-Made Citizens
Chantal Meza November 28, 2005 American Government POS 2042 Debate 24: "Becoming
President: Natural–Born Citizens Only or All Citizens?" In Debate 24, Forrest McDonald and John
Yinger each defend their opinion on whether natural–born citizens or all citizens should be eligible
to become president of the United States. It is safe to say that for the most part every boy and girl
has been taught that he or she has the capability to become the next president when they grow up.
However, what each boy and girl is not taught is that this statement is not entirely true because it
cannot be met by all. According to the Constitution, not every American boy and girl has the chance
to lead this country. In fact, any individual that has not ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Because Yinger does not ignore the concern of foreign influence, he is also very aware that he is
against the creation of naturalized citizens becoming second–class citizens. Considering that the
heart of our democracy is the principle of equal rights for all Americans, and amendment stating that
both natural–born citizens and naturalized citizens can run for president would affirm our nations
dedication to equal opportunity. John Yinger believes that naturalized citizens ineligibility to run for
president is a direct restrictions to the constitutional rights of any citizen. He feels that by forming
an amendment that gives naturalized citizens complete American citizenship expands the pool of
people who can run for president. Yinger also believes that an amendment such as this one would
only help assist the principle of equal rights for all American citizens. After reading Debate 24, I
cannot help but form my own personal opinion. I find myself supporting John Yinger 's point of
view on the debate because I believe that not only natural–born citizens should be allowed to
become president, but also naturalized citizens. If America has always been open to foreign–born
immigrants becoming equal citizens, then why should the exception that only a natural–born citizen
can become president exist? One of the greatest concerns enabling naturalized citizens to be eligible
to become president is the fear of foreign influence

I Am A White, Natural Born Citizen Of The United States
Ethnic Heritage Term Paper I am a white, natural–born citizen of the United States, but my family is
made up of a mix of immigrants. My paternal grandmother immigrated to the United States from
Sao Miguel, Portugal. My paternal grandfather's ancestors immigrated from England and Scotland
to Canada. Some of my mother's paternal ancestors immigrated from Spain to France before
immigrating to Canada, and others were Aboriginal Canadians. Three out of my four grandparents
have roots in Quebec, Canada. French Canadian is not a nationality that I identify with, but it is the
culture that has impacted my life the most, outside of American culture.
Out of my six Quebecois great grandparents only my maternal great grandmother is known to be of
an aboriginal background. All of my other great grandparents immigrated to or colonized Canada.
There is little known about my great grandmother's history, except that she moved to North Adams,
Massachusetts from Quebec and married my great grandfather in her early teens.
The first nations of Canada, prior to the landing of Europeans, were divided into six major
geographical groups. My great grandmother's ancestors most likely belonged to the Iroquoian first
nations. The Iroquois people were not nomadic and had a complex system of democratic
government. They are known for the impressive construction of longhouses and their system of
farming corn, beans, and squash. Running was the most popular form of transportation to the
Iroquois people

The Natural Born Citizen Clause
I The NATURAL–BORN CITIZEN CLAUSE AS ORIGINALLY UNDERSTOOD IN EARLY
AMERICAN AND BRITISH COMMON LAW WOULD REFUTE SENATOR CRUZ'S CASE
THAT HE IS A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN WITHOUT CORRESPONDING STATUTES
MAKING AN EXCEPTION.
The modern conventional wisdom of the phrase "natural born citizen" in the presidential eligibility
clause referred to anyone who was a U.S. citizen at birth either by a U.S. statute or via the
Constitution. The Constitution has no "definition" section, and subsequently the Supreme Court has
stated that when the Constitution is silent the law "must be interpreted in the light of the common
law, the principles and history of which were familiarly known to the framers of the Constitution."
My argument is simple, it is reasonable to assume that the framers, most of whom were well–trained
lawyers, purposely did not define the term 'natural born citizen' believing that the controlling
common law principle was Jus Soli, and that Congress would pass corresponding statutes to
accommodate any exceptions to this principle similar to the practice that occurred in England with
Parliament.
A. The Common Law Meaning of the "Natural–Born Clause" at the Time of Its Adoption in the
Constitution Most Likely Meant the Strict Approach of Jus Soli with the addition of Naturalization
Statutes.
According to one of the most famous English jurists of all time, Sir William Blackstone, the
definition "natural born" was best understood as a division of people into 'aliens' and

Pros And Cons Of Dual Citizen
I. Many people may not know that there are different types of United States citizens. A person is
either a natural born citizen or a naturalized citizen. Natural born citizens were born here and given
citizenship right away. Naturalized citizens are immigrants that followed the steps to citizenship.
Naturalization, the process to become a United States citizen is a lengthy procedure that includes
much paperwork and many legal affairs.
II. There are certain items that are required to enter the country.
A. The green card allows an immigrant to live in the country permanently.
1. The green card looks like a driver's license.
2. Immediate family members of a green card holder receive one as well.
3. An immigrant that is a refugee gets one too. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
America does not allow or disallow dual citizenship.
2. It simply does not recognize the other country as your home.
3. Many dual citizens say it is a blessing to be a citizen in multiple countries.
4. They say they love being a part of multiple cultures.
C. The conflict between the dual citizens and the military are as follows.
1. There is controversy about of a dual citizen can serve in the armed forces.
2. This is again due to security requirements.
3. One argument is that a dual citizen could be communicating with the other country they call
home.
4. The other argument is that the dual citizen would not have become a citizen just to spy on the
military.
VI. Illegal immigrants in the United States are turning into a massive problem. Illegal immigrants
looking for work in the United States sometimes buy fake identities in hope of not getting caught. In
2008, 313,982 identities were stolen in the United States. Fifteen percent were used to get
documents or benefits from the government. While another fifteen percent were used to get
employment, per the FTC. Naturalization, the process to become a United States citizen is a lengthy
procedure that includes much paperwork and many legal

Define Civil Rights Violation
Rights are not something that someone else, including a country or a constitution gives or confers
upon you. A fundamental right is a right you have by righteousness of your birth in your specific
country. We have different sets of right that apply to different scenarios of our lives. A constitution
just acknowledges such rights, and sets down a policy that such rights should not be violated. Civil
rights are rights help us protect individual freedoms of their illegal destruction and repression by the
power; whether that of governments or any other public or private political agent, and guarantee
capacity the citizen to participate in civil and political life of the State on equal terms and without
discrimination.
Civil rights are granted

Informative Essay On US Territories
Eleanor Boardman
English IV AP, 1
Mr. Wesley
04/19/2015
US Territories Americans, lack appreciation for the value of their citizenship, so they rarely question
whether others should be included in their given birthright privileges. The center in this rarely
discussed topic is the United States territories, they include American Samoa, Guam, the Northern
Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and the United States Virgin Islands. The territories for average
Americans are the places they can go for an exotic vacation without a passport. But for the islanders,
their relationship and citizenship with American is still heavily based on laws and court cases when
in they were acquired. Unlike many aspects of government changing in the last one hundred years,
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Currently all of the territories but American Samoa have citizenship in the United States. But,
unfortunately it is not the same as the birthright citizenship given to people born in the 50 states.
One of the main problems are in two words found in Article II, Section I, Clause 5 of the United
States Constitution, "natural born" citizens. These two word determine whether a citizen could run
for president or vice–president. The definition of these words has been quite controversial. Currently
they are defined as the place of birth being in one of the fifty states and not in a foreign country.
This definition does not make a firm stance on the US territories, because "citizens [born in the
territories] clearly are not foreign born, but [the question is] are these citizens natural born for
purposes of Article II(Torruella)." Though the majority of the citizens of the US do not have the
opportunity to run for president, still every child's dream when they are little is to become the leader
of the free world. The lack of this glimmer of hope is just the start to the unleveled playing fields of
the mainland US citizenship and territorial US

Immigration Reflection Paper
When I was reading the Constitution for anything that mentioned immigration or immigrant status, I
was shocked to learn that in Article 1 section 2 clause 2 stated, "No Person shall be a Representative
who shall not have attained to the age of twenty–five Years, and been seven Years a Citizen of the
United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State in which he shall be
chosen." This article basically meant that a citizen had to live in America for seven years and in the
state, they wanted to represent. I knew about living in the state that the congress member wanted to
run for, but not that they did not have to be a natural born citizen. This blew my mind. It seems that
this might be something that very few people

A More Perfect Constitution : Why The Constitution Must Be...
For more than 200 years, the U.S. Constitution has been used to run the government of the United
States, and it is what constructed and shaped America into the country it is today. The founding
fathers had established a constitution that would create a perfect union, establish justice, insure
tranquility, provide defense, promote welfare, and secure the liberty of American citizens. The
constitution has done exactly what the founders have intended, but with a fast–growing population
and a developing society, it has begun to limit the ways of the twenty–first century government. In
Larry J. Sabato's book, A More Perfect Constitution: Why the Constitution Must Be Revised: Ideas
to Inspire a New Generation, he states twenty–three proposals on how the constitution can be
modified to fit the needs of today's society in the form of a second constitutional convention. For
every proposal he proposes in the book, he also describes the issues that the current constitution
poses on America today. A constitutional convention is needed and with more knowledge we have
today than when the constitution was first written, it could now be revised and shape America into a
better nation. The U.S. Congress has worked much as how the founders have intended it to be. In the
book it says, "The legislative branch was and is designed to be the 'inefficient' element of the federal
government, slowing the 'efficient' branch, the presidency" (Sabato 22). The Senate consists of 100–
members at the

Naturalized Citizen Clause Pros And Cons
Argument Paper: The Naturalization Clause Controversy The United States is a nation built on
independence and freedom. This freedom, established through the constitution, allows American
citizens to be able to participate in their government. The same constitution also restricts freedom of
some Americans however. The naturalization clause amended to the constitution in 1790, forbids
naturalized citizens from becoming president. Many naturalized citizens have lived in America for
most of their lives and contribute to society just as much as a natural born citizen does. The
naturalized clause of 1790 should be removed from the constitution so that naturalized citizens also
have a chance to run for the presidency. To be able to understand the controversy surrounding the
natural born citizen clause in the constitution, it is important to know why it was added to the
constitution in the first place. The original purpose of this clause was to prevent the British rule from
coming to America and taking charge (Hulse). The National Constitution Center staff quoted the
natural born citizen clause in the constitution saying that "no person except a natural born citizen or
a citizen of the United States at the time of the adoption of this constitution shall be eligible to the
office of president" ("Natural Born"). This clause also allows children that are offspring of United
States citizens that are born internationally to obtain citizenship ("Natural Born"). At the time when
the

The Greco-Christian Beliefs Of American Democracy
In the winter of December 7th, 1787, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, the U.S. Constitution was
ratified to establish the new country of the United States as a democracy. After their victory over the
British for American Independence, the United States government created the Constitution in an
effort to further establish themselves as an independent nation. With a new form of government that
would not allow the injustices caused by the British monarchy to occur again, the Constitution's
fundamental principles abided by many of the Greco–Roman and Judeo–Christian beliefs about
people and government. The Judeo–Christian and Greco–Roman seeds of democracy contributed to
the United States' democratic government by protecting the rights of the individual and by giving
the ability for the citizens to vote on its leaders and laws.
The American Constitution was influenced partly by Judeo–Christian ideas, mainly that the natural
rights of individual should be protected and unalienable. Followers of Judaism surmised that
humans were created in God's image, and as such each individual "has a divine spark that gives him
or her a dignity that cannot be taken away" (M.W.H. 12). In the American democracy, the Bill of
Rights gives all of the country's citizens certain rights that are unalienable, and cannot be taken
away. As opposed to other forms of government, where the social status of a citizen determined his
or her rights, the American Constitution gave all citizens the same rights

Politics And The United States Essay
Politics has always been a contentious and controversial issue in the United States; immigrants are
constantly discriminated from exercising their civic duty such as the right to vote and to be voted
for. Politics in American is divided based on ideological difference and approach on key issues,
which has led to the two major political parties the Republican Party (conservative) often referred as
the GOP and the Democratic Party (liberal). Both parties hasn't yet come forward to fully discuss
this discriminatory act against the immigrants. These are people with the same equal rights as the
citizens, yet little is done to quench the situation. According to the United States census bureau,
there are about 42.2million foreign nationals residing in the United States, with about one in four
children under the age of 18 to having at least one foreign–born parent. This makes to about 12% of
the U.S population, consisting mostly of Latino and Asian descent. This is a tremendous number of
people living in a country and can't be fully integrated and accepted into the society, this is the same
as the number of people living in Italy. It is, however, ironic that the same people can serve in the
military and other risk occupation in the country. These immigrants have mostly lived their life in
American, working towards the American Dream, pledging their loyalty and allegiance to defend
America, while upholding and abiding the laws and rules of the country. Several federal laws

Crèvecoeur's What Is An American?
The American Dream is the belief where any American can be successful when completing hard
work. Do you believe that the American Dream is achievable? Is it guaranteed for both natural–born
Americans and immigrants? The American Dream is a definite reality because the United States is a
country that allows various opportunities for individuals to work for what they want and access
prosperity while doing so. Possessing a sense of self–independence is an important aspect of the
reality of the American Dream. In the letter, "What is an American?," written by J. Hector St. John
de Crèvecoeur, he describes the experience of European immigrants on the verge of becoming an
American citizen. According to the author, "The American is a new man, who acts upon new
principles; he must therefore entertain new ideas, and form new opinions" (Crèvecoeur 29). America
will mold you into a different person. It is our destiny to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For example, in the speech, "The Four Freedoms," by Franklin D. Roosevelt, he talks about how
having freedom is fundamental when you ask for peace in America. He says that "this nation has
placed its destiny in the hands and heads of its millions of free men and women, and its faith under
the guidance of God" (Roosevelt 47). Being an American is a destiny for both natural–born citizens
and immigrants. The American Dream can let anyone prosper when they are becoming self–reliant.
When Roosevelt mentions "free men and women," he is implying that individuals must make a
sacrifice. In my personal experience, a sacrifice was made when my parents moved to the United
States in 2003. We left the rest of our family at Fiji to get new opportunities. My parents wanted
have higher quality and home environments. The American Dream encourages immigrants to get the
same equal opportunities as the natural–born

Immigrants And Immigrants
There are more immigrants incarcerated than natural born citizens.
Research
There are approximately 43 million immigrants in the United States and about 11 million are illegal.
Compared to the total American population, only seven percent of the nation's population are non–
citizens. Approximately 22 percent of inmates in federal prison are non–citizens. (Perez)
Analysis
There are 43 million immigrants in the United states but the immigrant population can only compare
at seven percent to the total Unites states population. There is a major disproportion comparing the
total population of citizens and immigrants. Although there is a larger disparity between the
percentage of immigrants and citizens total population, federal prison is composed of 22 percent of
immigrants. The percentage of immigrants in federal prison have a smaller disparity between
immigrants and citizens. Compared to the population of immigrants and the population of citizens,
immigrants have a larger scale of immigrants in federal prison per immigrant population that the rate
of citizens in federal prison per natural born citizens population.
Research
One quarter of all inmates in California detention centers are Mexican descendant and also more
than 40 percent of all inmates in Arizona and 48 percent in New Mexico jails. (Peter B. Gemma)
Analysis
These statistics show that there are high percentages of immigrants in these states. These states are
bordering the foreign countries that have weak border

Essay On Should The Government Regulate The First Amendment
Regulate or Not?
Why would not the United States Government regulate the First Amendment in the Bill of Rights?
People in the government, and not in the government have many examples why the government
should not regulate the first amendment. The First Amendment gives us many freedoms. The United
States Government should not regulate the First Amendment.
For example, the United States Government should not regulate the First Amendment because
natural born or naturalized citizens have the right to exercise these freedoms. "They decided to wear
black armbands to create a policy that stated that any students wearing an armband would be asked
to remove it, with refusal in suspension" (Oyez, 1). Students at that school wore armbands, but some
students got suspended. These students had the right to regulate the First Amendment. If the United
States Government, people could not protest peacefully without getting arrested, like ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
"It gives us the right to criticize power to demand changes, and to learn what is going on in our
society so we can organize for political actions, and be informed voters" (Anastasia, 12). The First
Amendment allows us to change society and its leaders. With the First Amendment freedoms, we
can make change. Without our freedoms, we could not promote change and exercise our with the
First Amendment.
Lastly, the United States Government should not regulate the First Amendment because the
freedoms promote diversity among citizens. "Congress shall make no law respecting the
establishment of religion" (Anastasia, 12). Congress respects people's freedoms so they do not make
a law saying that you must have a religion. Having a different religion promotes diversity among
society. The First Amendment allows people to have any religion or none at all. The First
Amendment promotes and allows

Seven Articles And 27 Amendments
Seven articles and 27 amendments. This is what makes up the Constitution of the United States.
Most of those make America a better country. Others give us a turn for the worst. The most
important amendment is the last part of the eighth amendment. Even though we are known as the
"Melting Pot," Article II Section I of the Constitution a right that should be given to all of America's
citizens.
To begin, there are many important rights in the United States Constitution. In my opinion, the most
important right is part of the eighth amendment. It states "... nor cruel and unusual punishments
inflicted." This part of the amendment is more important because it stops the government from
harshly punishing criminals. Originally, this meant that

Undocumented Immigrants Be Deported Essay
Immigration has been a hot topic for not only President's Trump first 100 days in office, but also
became a hot topic during the presidential campaign leading up to the election. There are a multitude
of different debates that fall under the immigration category, but an issue that should be discussed in
the national discourse by engaging citizens is the legalization and granting of citizenship to
undocumented immigrants living in the United States. Even though it is heavily debated,
undocumented immigrants should be granted the legal right to become U.S. citizens. A poll done by
CNN in March states that "71% of people believe that the government should not attempt to deport
all people current living in the country illegally" (Kopan, 1) compared to only "27% that believe
illegal immigrants should be deported" by the same poll. This is key in the discussion being debated
that undocumented immigrants should be legal citizens of the United States. There are a significant
amount of undocumented immigrants who currently reside in the United States today. According to
the Pew Research ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Undocumented immigrants have created lives here and become part of communities, and it is not
right to take that away from them. Not only is it not inhumane, but also it would hurt the economy
as well since granting citizenship to undocumented workers causing the economy to grow, not stunt
its growth. Even though many believe that undocumented immigrants becoming citizens will harm
citizen's jobs, this is also proven to be false because immigrants create jobs and fill the gaps of the
jobs not done by natural born citizens. Undocumented immigrants also are proven to not commit as
many crimes as the American counterpart, unlike many opponents' views. By legalizing and
allowing the citizenship of over 11 million people, our country can grow, not only financially in our
economy, but grow as a

What Influenced The American Revolution
Throughout the years of 1750–1914, an age of revolutions broke out, causing a global change in
politics. The Enlightenment Ideals influenced this worldwide change, from the social contract,
separation of power, and natural rights. The social contract influenced the revolutions when all
middle/lower class people wanted equality in their country. Natural rights take place in the
worldwide revolutions because everyone wants to live with life, liberty, and the pursuit of
happiness. Some documents that influence these revolutions are the Declaration of Independence,
U.S. Constitution, and The Saint–Domingue Constitution of 1801. Natural rights influenced the
French and Latin American Revolutions because the citizens of these areas were yearning for
change and needed a government that would influence equality, and create a constitution to drop the
hierarchy of citizens, and fabricate a civil, utopian society that the citizens actually would appreciate
a lifestyle that acknowledges political and social freedom. As John Locke states, "The end of law is
not to abolish or restrain, but to preserve and enlarge freedom. For in all the states of created beings
capable of law, where there is no law, there is no freedom." John Locke's quote inspired quite a
handful ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
During the American Revolution, the thirteen colonies needed freedom from England because of the
unbearable, heavyweight taxes. The authors of the Declaration announced, "We hold these truths to
be self–evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain
unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness." Demonstrating
a quantity of Enlightenment Ideals, this quote displays the ideal of natural rights because natural
rights entitle everyone to live once they are born, to do anything they want unless it conflicts with
the

Must The President Be Born In The Usa Analysis
Must The President Be Born In The USA? The issue on whether or not the President of the USA
must be born in the USA has been very heated argument, especially now that we are exceptionally
close to the 2016 President elections. Some of the candidates have strong opinions on this topic.
Republican candidate Donald Trump says, " You can't have a nominee who's going to be subject to
being thrown out as the nominee." He was pointing out the fact that although Ted Cruz's mother was
born in the U.S but his father was born in Canada, and Ted Cruz was born in Canada. The argument
of those that support the statement that people must be born in the US, is that in the Article 2 of the
constitution states "No person except a natural born citizen shall ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
My opinion is that if a child is not born but is brought to the United States at a young age, maybe 15
years old or younger, then they too should have a chance to be president of the country in which
they were raised in for most of their life. I believe that if a child is brought at a young age, by the
time they are old enough to be president, 35 years old, then they have grown up in the culture of the
United States and they have been living here for most of their lives, that it is almost like they were
born in the U.S. On the other hand if the child was brought to the United States later on in life then
they might not appreciate the United States as much, because they might have been brought to the
United States by their parents, and they might have a hard time going against their home country in
times like war. I also agree with the fact that the term "natural born citizen" is very ambiguous. A
child that is born within the borders of the US is obviously a natural born citizen, but it could also
mean someone with American parents, regardless of not being born in the U.S is American. This
term is very vague and since the Supreme Court has not ruled on a specific definition, I believe that
it can be interpreted in different

Voting Rights Case Study
1. The United States constitution gives a clear definition who qualifies to be the President of the
United States of America. In Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, the constitution states that in order to
qualify the person must be a natural–born citizen, be at least 35 years of age and have been at least
14 years a resident. These qualifications have been truncated in order to include only the portion of
qualification relevant to the current times. Though two of these qualifications are clear the portion of
'natural born citizen' has been a point of contention for quite some time. U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark, 18
S. Ct. 456, sets a precedent for the definition of Natural Born Citizens. In this case, Wong Kim Ark
alleged to be an American citizen and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Supreme Court also referred to the Voting Rights Act with respect to the outlawing of a
durational residential requirement in voting in the presidential and vice–presidential elections. Since
all states fall under Federal Law that the state could not use this as a requirement. Since state matters
are different though they concluded that anything longer than 30 days would be too long. The
Supreme Court also looked at the restriction of travel since this residential law was a punishment on
anyone who had made a recent interstate move. Since the right to travel is a fundamental right there
should not be any laws that restrict citizen's rights to do so if there is no compelling government
interest. In this case, citizens were burdened by having their right to vote revoked. It seems that the
reason why the court case was not more controversial was because it did not remove the states'
power to impose residential qualifications in other social projects. The only restriction on to the
states was that the state cannot have a residential requirement in order to allow someone to

Ted Cruz Cons
Should the President of the United States have to be born on United States soil?
A controversial debate is roaring across the nation in Decision 2016, but it is not the politics of the
candidates, it's the legitimacy of their candidacy. The Constitution, America's rulebook, states that,
"No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United State, at the time of the adoption
of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to
that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a
resident within the United States," (Legal Information Institute). This excerpt from the Constitution
clearly states that to run for Presidential ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Many people have different theories. As mentioned earlier, this clause in the Constitution is to
protect the United States from influence from outside countries. What this means is that a group can
form a conspiracy in which they plan to become the POTUS (President of the United States) and
other major parts in government to keep the conspirators in power. This could lead to tyranny in the
nation and utterly destroying what America stands for, Democracy. There are, however, good things
that can come out of the removal of the Natural Born Citizen Clause. These foreign leaders could
bring in new ideas and philosophies. This would be beneficial, but would you take the risk of being
ruled by another country? I don't think you

Examples Of America's Founding Fathers
Did you ever wonder how the United States' founders envisioned America to be in the years to
come? America's founding fathers were tasked with the difficult challenge of finding a balance
between preserving individual rights and forming a strong, long–lasting union. There are many
examples of how the founding fathers found a balance. Some examples of this are showcased in the
Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights, and A New American Nation.
A New American Nation shows that the founding fathers believed that there are certain rights that an
a person is created with. A New American Nation reports that "Jefferson's eloquent and stirring
articulation of the natural law that would govern America proclaimed the idea that people are born
with rights and freedoms that government must protect". Thomas Jefferson's ideals would preserve
the rights of each person while they are located in the United States of America. Jefferson is able to
preserve the rights of the American people, by stating that some of the rights that are bestowed
towards citizens must be protected by their government. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
An explanation of this quote is in order to find a balance between preserving individual rights and
forming a long–lasting union the Declaration of Independence grants the United States' citizens the
power to shape or change their government. The government being able to be shaped by the United
States' citizens creates a long–lasting union for America. The United States of America's inhabitants
are given the power to shape the United States' government as they see

Foreign-Born American, Yes You Can Become President!...
Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5 of the United States Constitution states that no person except a
natural–born citizen shall be eligible to run for President of the United States. This was due to John
Jay, the presiding officer of the Constitutional Convention, who wrote a letter to George Washington
in 1787 arguing that the Commander–in–Chief of the United States Army should not be anyone but
a natural–born American (Schneider 6). The Founders were concerned that subversive enemies
could force the fledgling republic back to foreign monarchical rule. Delegates did not want the
United States to suffer the same fate as Poland, which in 1772 had been partitioned among Austria,
Prussia and Russia after agents of those countries bribed Polish ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
For instance, foreign–born American soldiers have bravely fought for the United States during
World War I, World War II, the Korean War, Vietnam War, and the War in Iraq (Barker 16). These
heroes were not American–born citizens; however, they were so loyal to the United States that some
of them have even sacrificed their lives to help ensure the freedom of American citizens (Barker 16).
Some of these soldiers and foreign–born Americans have witnessed the cruelty of communist
nations, such as the Soviet Union. That was why they had decided to abandon their home and travel
overseas to the United States. These soldiers fought for the United States because they believed in
the truth of American society and American freedom just as firmly as they believed in freedom when
they first gave up their homes and decided to live in the Unites States. If foreign–born American
soldiers could make the decision to love America more than their lives on the battlefield, then how
could people say that foreign–born American citizens would favor other nations more than America
if they were to become President? In addition, more than 700 immigrants in uniform have been
awarded the Medal of Honor since the Civil War, and 60,000 now serve in the military (Kasindorf
7). This is not a small number. It shows the

Pros And Cons Of The American Constitution
The American Constitution, is a document that was drafted in July of 1787 to replace The Articles of
Confederation. The Constitution created a national government and established major laws to
benefit America. Along with these impressive actions, our Founding Fathers made sure this
document contained the ability for each individual citizen of America to have basic guaranteed
rights. This should stand for all citizens, not only those who are natural–born. The Constitution,
leaving out equal opportunity and equal rights to those not born in America, essentially makes the
document unfitting for our current government and society. The Constitution has been amended and
ratified twenty–seven times. For our country's current situation and diverse population, it is
important that a Twenty–Eighth Amendment be put into place to give all citizens, natural born or
not, all basic rights.
Although, this amendment does not directly benefit myself, I intend to amend Article 2 Section 1 of
The Constitution for the rights of my fellow Americans. This article states: that anyone born
"beyond the seas" is not eligible to run for presidency unless both his birth parents are citizens of the
United States. I believe this unfair and unfit article should be amended to give any citizen living in
the country for a minimum of 30 years– even if the individual was born in and lived in another
country. Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution is states: "No person except a natural born

Us Vs Wong Kim Ark Case Study
Case: United States v. Wong Kim Ark, March 28, 1898
Facts: A man was denied reentry into the United States from China considering the fact that he was
born in the United States. The case involving United States v Wong Kim Ark involved the party,
Wong Kim Ark, Thomas Riordan the lawyer of the Chinese Consulate, and the United States District
Attorney. The dispute of the case was argued that anyone born in United States soil is considered a
United States Citizen despite the nationality of the parents. If born in the United States you are a
citizen. This case entered the Supreme court due to Wong Kim Ark was denied reentry into the
United states after his second visit from China, despite the fact that Wong Kim Ark was born in the
United States ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Concurrence 2: (Bancroft): a person that is "natural born–citizen" regardless of geographical
circumstances is afforded and eligible for citizenship, while children of United States (citizens) are
not afforded the same opportunity.
Concurrence 3: (Doolittle): Citizenship is narrowed down to American Indians from citizenship and
tax. Proposal was to add phrase citizenship of born persons of the Unite States to "Civil Rights Acts"
for all people born in the United States and not to tax.
Dissent 1: Fuller (joined by Harlan)
A. Common law rule was very formal, and Wong Kim was not in question to the jurisdiction
because of his parents. United States has broken its traditional law regarding citizenship.
B. If the decision ruled majority opinion and is correct, then the children of citizens of the who were
born since July 8, 1868 in the United States, when the amendment was approved, then, aliens,
except they have, or will be attaining more, become citizens by naturalization in the United States,
and no statutory provision to the contrary is of any force or

Presidential Debates : America 's Tapestry Of Tradition
Presidential Debates! Those two words can either send an agonizing cringe down one 's spine or it
can send nerve–wrecking excitement down one 's spine. Whichever way it may be taken,
Presidential Debates are interweaved into America 's tapestry of tradition. It has always been to one
of the most exciting events that take place every four years. Accompanied with Presidential Debates,
precedes Presidential Candidate. We all know that there has to be at least two Presidential
Candidates in order for Presidential Debates to exist. The 2016 Presidential Debates have been the
what many people are naming the most intense and entertaining debates in American history. As of
the date I am writing this, there are five presidential candidates (three Republicans and two
Democrats). There was a total of twenty–three presidential candidates (seventeen Republicans and
six Democrats). In my opinion, out of all of the existing candidates Ted Cruz is the most qualified
for president in the upcoming election. Nevertheless, I think I should define qualify to you in order
for you to truly understand the question. Qualify means according to Merriam–Webster online
dictionary, " A) To be entitled to a particular benefit or privilege by fulfilling a necessary condition.
B) To give (someone) the necessary skill or knowledge to do a particular job or activity. C) To have
the necessary skill or knowledge to do a particular job or activity. D) To have the qualifications to do

Is Ted Cruz Eligible for the Presidency

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Leslie Lee

More from Leslie Lee (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Is Ted Cruz Eligible for the Presidency