The American founders did not recognize the importance of public administration when establishing the government system. They focused instead on developing the nation's economy and wanted individuals to be self-sufficient rather than dependent on public services. Today, public organizations play a major role in society by providing important services like educating low-income families. While the founders prioritized independence and limiting government influence, modern representatives should work to incorporate public administration into the government structure and ensure its protection, as it has become critical to American society. However, reorganizing the government in this way would be a complex process requiring significant political coordination and debate.

1. Respond to each peer with response being 3-4 sentences long
Peer #1
Unfortunately, the American founders did not recognize public
administration as part of the American government. There was
not an agreement that protects the public organizations; instead,
public managers must develop strategies and make campaigns to
obtain donations. Indeed, public administration managers grow
strategies to increase political support. Truly, public
administrators work on building relationship with policymaking.
They struggle to keep providing services to the public. In fact,
public agencies should follow strict rules and requirements to
comply with the government rules. Equally, public managers
face challenges such as obtaining enough funding to provide
services. Therefore, the government may regroup its
department; thus, public administration could be included and
protected by politicians. Truly, the government’s reorganization
requires lot of directions and political influences. In fact,
representatives debate on what department should public
administration be allocated. However, they need to agree and
cooperate in the reorganize of the system (Stillman, 2013).
In my opinion, American Founders did not recognize the
importance of public administration by the time the created the
government system and its functions. They focused on the
nation’s economy. Today, public organizations make a
tremendous impact on American society. For example, public
services educate low income families about child development,
a healthy child may be able to learn new things. Equally, the
government may include public administration in its system.
Politicians should work together in making changes. Certainly,
politicians’ coordination and agreement are critical.
Accordingly, authorities’ organization and influencing will
affect public administration future. Truly, it will be time
consuming.

2. Certainly, American founders had their own reasons why they
left public administration unprotected. They considered the
power of administration as a critical issue. Therefore, public
administration was viewed as a subject that disturbed justice
and the efficiency of the American government. Considerably,
representatives observed public administration as a benefit or a
privilege for certain groups (Spicer, 2017). Unconditionally,
American founders considered security as vital for the nation as
well as for the citizens. They believed that each person should
be self-sufficiency, instead of depending on others. They though
each person should pursue their own happiness and right of
liberty (Spalding, 2010).
I believed, American founders had their theories to create a
strong nation where everyone could be independent and grow by
himself/herself. In the same way, public services were against
American founders’ values and vision. The goal was to grow a
strong financial nation. For example, they wanted to develop a
great educational system where everyone has access to
education. Representatives considered that a well-educated
person may be self-sufficiency. He/she will collaborate with the
society and will grow his/her own money.
References
Spalding, M.; (2010). America’s Founders and the Principles of
Foreign Policy: Sovereign
Independence, National Interests, and the Cause of Liberty in
the World.
The Heritage Foundation.

3. Spicer, M. W.; (2017). The Founders, the Constitution, and
Public Administration. A Conflict
in World Views.
Georgetown University Press
Stillman, R.; (2013). Public Administration. Wadsworth 9
2010-01-01
Peer #2
Explain what was the profound irony embedded in the decision
of the American Founders to leave questions of public
administration for other generations of leaders to work out.
I read the article “The Myth of bureaucratic paradigm” and it
was a very interesting journal from
Larry Lynn, "The Myth of the Bureaucratic Paradigm," is
provocative to say the least, I come to this admission not
because of the overwhelming popularity of Lynn's work or my
enduring "affection for the author or ... the prestige this author
confers on the field" but because of the intellectual merit the
essay demonstrates. I couldn't agree more with Lynn's overall
premise and his conclusion that the traditional bureaucratic
paradigm of public administration has proven to be much more
responsive to democratic values than has the revisionists' new,
customer-oriented materialism and, not to be overlooked, for an
"outsider," Lynn provides a respectable and comprehensive
review of the intellectual heritage of the field of public
administration. That said, I fundamentally disagree with many
of Lynn's assertions. In particular, I disagree with one of his
central theses: that students of public administration have failed
to adequately challenge the New Public Management. I also take
issue with another theme that runs, perhaps more obliquely,
throughout Lynn's piece: the methodological claims and
interests of the New Public Management as compared with those
of the "old" public management. Here, Lynn seems to suggest

4. that, due to a tradition of being "unduly careless," not only the
New Public Management but the broader field of public
administration itself "seems to have let lapse [its] moral and
intellectual authority". Let me begin by parting company with
Lynn's assertions that traditional public administration was
unable to mount a sound, meaningful challenge to revisionist
thought advanced by the New Public Management.
Lynn,Laurence E.,,Jr. (2001). The myth of the bureaucratic
paradigm: What traditional public administration really stood
for.
Public Administration Review, 61
(2), 144-160. Retrieved from
https://search-proquest-
com.southuniversity.libproxy.edmc.edu/docview/197171142?acc
ountid=87314