History and Origin of 10th Planet- The ERIS...... word document

1. ERIS - THE TENTH PLANET
A technical paper Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirement For the award
of the degree of
BACHELOR OF TECHNOLOGY
IN
ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING
Submitted By
S.Md.Noor Zeba Khanam (115K1A0412)
Under the Esteemed Guidance of
Er. A.RAJENDRA BABU M.Tech, (Ph.D.,)
Head of the Department (E.C.E)
JAWAHARLAL NEHRU TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY
ANANTAPURAMU (JNTUA)
BHARATH COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY FOR WOMEN
KADAPA – 516003
(2011-2015)

2. A TECHNICAL SEMINAR ON
ERIS – THE TENTH PLANET
Submitted to
Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Anantapuram
In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree of
BACHELOR OF TECHNOLOGY
IN
ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING
By
S.MD.NOOR ZEBAKHANAM 115K1A0412
Under the guidance of
Er. A.RAJENDRA BABU, M.Tech, (Ph.D.,)
Associate Professor & HOD of ECE
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering
BHARATH COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING& TECHNOLOGY FOR WOMEN
(Affiliated to JNT University, Anantapuram and approved by AICTE, New Delhi)
Buggaletipalli, C.K.Dinne, Kadapa-516003.
(2011-2015)

3. SOLAR SYSTEM
The Solar System was formed approximately 4.6 billion years ago and consists of the
Sun, planets, dwarf planets and other astronomical objects bound in its orbit. The formation
was cause by the collapse of a giant molecular cloud, the mass at the centre collecting to form
the Sun and a flat disk of dust around it which the planets and other bodies would eventually
be formed from.
About 99.86% of the system’s mass is found in the Sun and the majority of the remaining
0.14% is contained within the solar system’s eight planets.
The four smaller inner planets, also known as the “terrestrial planets” (Mercury, Venus, Earth
and Mars), are primarily composed of rock and metal. The four outer planets, also known as
the “gas giants” (Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune), are substantially larger and more
massive than the inner planets.
The two innermost gas giants, Jupiter and Saturn, are the larger of the four and are composed
mainly of hydrogen and helium. The two outermost gas giants, Uranus and Neptune, are
composed largely of ices, (water, ammonia and methane) and are sometimes also referred to
as the “ice giants“.
Other objects of note in the Solar System are the dwarf planets (Ceres, Pluto, Haumea,
Makemake & Eris), moons, asteroids, the asteroid belt, comets and the Kuiper belt.
ORIGIN OF TENTH PLANET:
Astronomers have discovered an object in our solar system that is larger than Pluto.
They are calling it the 10th planet, but already that claim is contested.
It is the first time an object so big has been found in our solar system since the
discovery of Pluto 75 years ago.
The announcement, made today by Mike Brown of Caltech, came just hours after
another newfound object, one slightly smaller than Pluto, was revealed in a very
confusing day for astronomers and the media. The new object, temporarily named
2003 UB313, is about three times as far from the Sun as is Pluto.
"It's definitely bigger than Pluto," said Brown, a professor of planetary astronomy.
The object is round and could be up to twice as large as Pluto, Brown told reporters
in a hastily called NASA-run teleconference Friday evening. His best estimate is that
it is 2,100 miles wide, about 1-1/2 times the diameter of Pluto.

4. One of many?
The object is inclined by a whopping 45 degrees to the main plane of the solar
system, where most of the other planets orbit. That's why it eluded discovery:
nobody was looking there until now, Brown said. Some astronomers view it as a
Kuiper Belt object and not a planet. The Kuiper Belt is a region of frozen objects
beyond Neptune.
Pluto is called a Kuiper Belt object by many astronomers. Brown himself has argued
in the past for Pluto's demotion from planet status, because of its diminutive size
and eccentric and inclined orbit.
But today he struck a different note.
"Pluto has been a planet for so long that the world is comfortable with that," Brown
said in the teleconference. "It seems to me a logical extension that anything bigger
than Pluto and farther out is a planet."
Offering additional justification, Brown said 2003 UB313 appears to be surfaced with
methane ice, as is Pluto. That's not the case with other large Kuiper Belt objects,
however.
"This object is in a class very much like Pluto," he said.
NASA effectively endorsed the idea in an official statement that referred to 2003
UB313 as the 10th planet.
Yet in recent years, a bevy of objects roughly half to three-fourths the size of Pluto
have been found.
No definition for 'planet'
Brian Marsden, who runs the Minor Planet Center where data on objects like this are
collected, says that if Pluto is a planet, then other round objects nearly as large as
Pluto ought to be called planets. On that logic, 2003 UB313 would perhaps be a
planet, but it would have to get in line behind a handful of others that were
discovered previously.
"I would not call it the 10th planet," Marsden told SPACE.com.
Alan Boss, a planet-formation theorist at the Carnegie Institution of
Washington, called the discovery "a major step." But Boss would not call it a planet

5. at all. Instead, he said Pluto and other small objects beyond Neptune should be
called, at best, "Kuiper Belt planets."
"To just call them planets does an injustice to the big guys in the solar system," Boss
said in a telephone interview.
The very definition of what constitutes a planet is currently being debated by Boss
and others in a working group of the International Astronomical Union. Boss said
the group has not reached consensus after six months of discussion.
Discovery images of the dwarfplanet Eris. The threeimages were taken 1 1/2 hours apart on the night
of October 21st,2003. The Eris can be seen very slowly movingacross the sky over thecourse of 3
hours.
Eris, the largest dwarf planet known, was discovered in an ongoing survey at
Palomar Observatory's Samuel Oschin telescope by astronomers Mike Brown
(Caltech), Chad Trujillo (Gemini Observatory), and David Rabinowitz (Yale
University). We officially suggested the name on 6 September 2006, and it was
accepted and announced on 13 September 2006. In Greek mythology, Eris is the
goddess of warfare and strife. She stirs up jealousy and envy to cause fighting and anger
among men. At the wedding of Peleus and Thetis, the parents of the Greek hero Achilles, all
the gods with the exception of Eris were invited, and, enraged at her exclusion, she
spitefully caused a quarrel among the goddesses that led to the Trojan war. In the
astronomical world, Eris stirred up a great deal of trouble among the international
astronomical community when the question of its proper designation led to a
raucous meeting of the IAU in Prague. At the end of the conference, IAU members
voted to demote Pluto and Eris to dwarf-planet status, leaving the solar system with
only eight planets.
The satellite of Eris has received the offical name Dysnomia, who in Greek
mythology is Eris' daughter and the demon spirit of lawlessness. As Dysnomia is a

6. bit of a mouthful, we tend to simply call the satellite Dy, for short.
As promised for the past year, the name Xena (and satellite Gabrielle) were simply
placeholders while awaiting the IAU's decision on how an official name was to be
proposed. As that process dragged on, however, many people got to know Xena and
Gabrielle as the real names of these objects and are sad to see them change. We
admit to some sadness ourselves.We used the names for almost two years now and
are having a hard time swtiching. But for those who miss Xena, look for the obvious
nod in the new name of the moon of Eris.
The discovery of 2003 UB313 Eris, the 10th planet largest known dwarf planet
Discovery images of the dwarf planet Eris. The three images were taken 1 1/2 hours
apart on the night of October 21st, 2003.
The Eris can be seen very slowly moving across the sky over the course of 3 hours.
Eris is 27% more massive than Pluto 2003 UB313 is now officially Eris!
Eris, the largest dwarf planet known, was discovered in an ongoing survey at
Palomar Observatory's Samuel Oschin telescope by astronomers Mike Brown
(Caltech), Chad Trujillo (Gemini Observatory), and David Rabinowitz (Yale
University). We officially suggested the name on 6 September 2006, and it was
accepted and announced on 13 September 2006. In Greek mythology, Eris is the
goddess of warfare and strife. She stirs up jealousy and envy to cause fighting and
anger among men. At the wedding of Peleus and Thetis, the parents of the Greek
hero Achilles, all the gods with the exception of Eris were invited, and, enraged at
her exclusion, she spitefully caused a quarrel among the goddesses that led to the

7. Trojan war. In the astronomical world, Eris stirred up a great deal of trouble among
the international astronomical community when the question of its proper
designation led to a raucous meeting of the IAU in Prague. At the end of the
conference, IAU members voted to demote Pluto and Eris to dwarf-planet status,
leaving the solar system with only eight planets.
The satellite of Eris has received the offical name Dysnomia, who in Greek
mythology is Eris' daughter and the demon spirit of lawlessness. As Dysnomia is a
bit of a mouthful, we tend to simply call the satellite Dy, for short.
As promised for the past year, the name Xena (and satellite Gabrielle) were simply
placeholders while awaiting the IAU's decision on how an official name was to be
proposed. As that process dragged on, however, many people got to know Xena and
Gabrielle as the real names of these objects and are sad to see them change. We
admit to some sadness ourselves.We used the names for almost two years now and
are having a hard time swtiching. But for those who miss Xena, look for the obvious
nod in the new name of the moon of Eris.

8. Artists concept of the view from Eris with Dysnomia in the background, looking
back towards the distant sun. Credit: Robert Hurt (IPAC)
What is it?
This new dwarf planet (see the now out of date "What makes a planet?" below) is the
largest object found in orbit around the sun since the discovery of Neptune and its
moon Triton in 1846. It is larger than Pluto, discovered in 1930. Like Pluto, the new
dwarf planet is a member of the Kuiper belt, a swarm of icy bodies beyond Neptune
in orbit around the sun. Until this discovery Pluto was frequently described as "the
largest Kuiper belt object" in addition to being a dwarf planet. Pluto is now the
second largest Kuiper belt object, while this is the largest currently known.
Where is it?

9. The dwarf planet is the most distant object ever seen in orbit around the sun, even
more distant than Sedna, the planetoid discovered almost 2 years ago. It is almost 10
billion miles from the sun and more than 3 times more distant than the next closest
planet, Pluto and takes more than twice as long to orbit the sun as Pluto.
A view of the solar system from the north down.
The four circles show the orbits of Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune. The yellow
dot in the center is the sun. The earth, if it were shown, would be inside the yellow
dot representing the sun. The orbits of the two outermost planets, along with their
current positions, are also shown. If you are worried because the sun appears to not
be the focus of the orbital ellipse you are very observant! But it is just a projection
effect. The see the full 3D orbit go to this very nice web page
The dwarf planet can be seen using very high-end amateur equipment, but you need
to know where to look. The best way to find precise coordinates (of this planet, or
any other body in the solar system) is with JPL's horizons system. Click on "select
target" and then enter "2003 UB313" under small bodies.
The orbit of the new dwarf planet is even more eccentric than that of Pluto. Pluto
moves from 30 to 50 times the sun-earth distance over its 250 year orbit, while the
new planet moves from 38 to 97 times the sun-earth distance over its 560 year orbit.

10. How big is it?
Usually when we first discover distant objects in the outer solar system we don't
know for sure how large they are. Why not? Because all we see is a dot of light, like
the picture at the top of the page. This dot of light is sunlight reflected off the surface
of the planet (interestingly the sunlight takes almost a day to get out to the planet,
reflect off of it, and get back to the earth!), but we don't know if the object is bright
because it is large or if it is bright because it is highly reflective or both.
When an object is too far away to directly see how big it is, astronomers use an
indirect method instead where they measure the heat coming from the object. If we
wanted to measure the size of a fire, for example, we could do it by measuring the
total amount of heat coming from the fire. The temperature of the flames in a match
and a bonfire are essentially the same,
When an object is too far away to directly see how big it is, astronomers use an
indirect method instead where they measure the heat coming from the object. If we
wanted to measure the size of a fire, for example, we could do it by measuring the
total amount of heat coming from the fire. The temperature of the flames in a match
and a bonfire are essentially the same, but a bonfire emits much more heat because it
is much bigger. The same is true of distant planets. Because we know how far away
the planet is we have a pretty good idea of the surface temperature (a frosty 405
degrees below zero!), thus when we measure the total heat we can tell how big the
object is. Unfortunately, the new planet is so far away and so cold that our first
attempt at measuring the heat, using the Spitzer Space Telescope, could not detect
the heat output. This fact tells us that the object must be smaller than about 3300 km.
In the meantime, observations have been made by a group from the University of
Bonn from the 30-meter IRAM telescope. This telescope, like Spitzer, measures the
heat output. IRAM measures the heat output in a region of the spectrum where
much less heat is given off, but IRAM is a much larger telescope than Spitzer. The
observations were successful in finally detecting the heat of Eris. From the amount of
heat measured they determined that Eris has a diameter of 3000 +/- 400 km. A very
nice discussion of the measurement and what the uncertainties mean can be found
at the press release web page.
The newest size measurement comes from the Hubble Space Telescope. While

11. for most telescopes the planet is too small to be seen as anything other than a dot of
light, HST can (just barely) directly measure how big across it is. The measurement is
extremely hard, however, even for HST, because even HST distorts light a little bit as
it goes through the telescope, and we needed to be sure that we were measuring the
actual size of the planet, rather than being fooled by distortion. So we waited until
Eris was very close to a star and then snapped a series of 28 pictures and carefully
went back and forth comparing the star and the planet. In the end, we determined
that Eris t is 2400 +/- 100 km across.
The best ever picture from the Hubble Space Telescope, as unimpressive as it is
(since Eris is so so so so so far away) looks like this:
When we initially guessed how big Erist was, we thought it was likely a bit larger,
because we guessed that it probably reflected the same amount of sunlight as Pluto
(about 60%). But this new size measurement tells us that the planet reflects
considerably more sunlight than Pluto (86 +/- 7%)!. For more on this see below on
what Eris is made out of.
The new HST measurement makes it sound like the previous measurement was
"wrong," but it was not! All measurements in science are subject to uncertainty, and

12. the group from Bonn carefully stated what their uncertainty was, just as we have
with the new measurement. The
What is on the surface of Eris?
We study the composition of distant objects by looking at sunlight reflected off of
them. The sunlight reflected off the surface of the earth, for example, shows distinct
signatures of the oxygen in earth's atmosphere, of photosynthetic plants, and of
abundant water, among other things. We have been using the Gemini Observatory
on Mauna Kea, Hawaii to study the light reflected from the surface of Eris, and have
found that the dwarf planet looks remarkably similar to Pluto. A comparison of the
two is shown below, where we show the amount of sunlight reflected in near
infrared light. This type of light, just beyond what is visible to the human eye, is
most sensitive to the types of ices expected on surfaces in the outer solar system.
The plot above compares the amount of infrared sunlight of different colors
("wavelength") reflected from the new planet with the amount of sunlight reflected

13. from Pluto. The dips in the amount of sunlight at 1.15, 1.35, 1.7, and 2.3 um are a
characteristic signature of a surface covered with solid frozen methane (natural gas).
Both Pluto and Eris show these signatures. At the very low temperatures of Pluto
and Eris, methane, which is in gaseous form on the earth, is frozen solid. The interior
of Eris, like the interior of Pluto, is likely a mixture of rock and ice.
Pluto and the new dwarf planet are not completely identical, however. While
Pluto's surface is moderately red, the new dwarf planet appears almost white, and
while Pluto has a mottled-looking surface which reflects on average 60% of the
sunlight which hits it, the new planet appears essentially uniform and reflects 86%
(+/- 7%) of the light that hits it. These characteristics were not at all expected. In fact,
Eris reflects more sunlight from its surface than any body in the solar system other
than Saturn's moon Enceladus, which has active geysers continuously coating the
surface in fresh frost. We can't think of any source of heat for Eris that would cause
similar geysers. So what is happening?
We think that the bright surface and uniform white coloring of the planet both have
the same cause. Right now the planet is as far away from the sun as it ever gets, and
thus as cold as it ever gets. At this distance from the sun even the planet's
atmosphere is frozen solid. (In fact if the earth were brought that far away from the
sun its atmosphere would freeze solid, too!). In 280 years the planet will be the
closest it ever gets -- a factor of almost 2.6 times closer. The absolute temperature on
the planet will rise over the next 280 years by a factor of 1.6 (which is the square root
of 2.6). The current temperature of (a quite cold) 405 degrees below zero will be but a
distant memory at this point when the temperatures will be a balmy 360 degrees
below zero. While both of these temperatures seem frigid beyond imagination, to
methane and nitrogen (the likely components of the atmosphere of the planet), the
difference between the two is the difference between frozen solid and evaporating
into the atmosphere.
In this hypothesis, then, Eris is bright and uniform because the atmosphere that it
used to have (280 years ago at its peak) is now frozen solid to the ground, giving a
bright shining coating to whatever type of mottled surface used to be there. The
whole atmosphere is now probably only a few inches thick.
This whole process repeats itself over and over and over with the dwarf planet's
orbital period of 580 years.

14. For comparison, the relative temperature change on the new planet is equivalent to
the earth's average temperature changing from about 60 degrees F to about 360
degrees F ever 6 months. No other planet in the solar system -- dwarf or otherwise --
goes through temperature swings nearly as extreme as this!
What is Eris made out of?
While we can only see the surface of the dwarf planet, we have some educated
guesses about the interior. Pluto, we know, has a density about midway between ice
and rock, thus we think that it is made of about half and half ice and rock on the
inside. The new planet, being about the same size and the same surface composition
as Pluto, is probably close to the same. We used to suspect that all objects out in the
Kuiper belt are the same on the inside but recent measurements suggest a very wide
variety! For this reason, we are quite anxious to measure the actual density of the
planet itself. Such a measurement is possible by measuring the mass of the planet by
looking at the way its moon goes around it and then dividing this mass by the
volume (which we know because we know the size). We need more observations of
the moon to accurately determine its orbit, however, so we don't think we will know
the answer until the end of the year.
How was Eris found?
We have been conducting an ongoing survey of the outer solar system using the
Palomar QUESTcamera and the Samuel Oschin Telescope at Palomar Observatory
in Southern California. This survey has been operating since the fall of 2001, with the
switch to the QUESTcamera happening in the summer of 2003. To date we have
found around 80 bright Kuiper belt objects.
To find objects, we take three pictures of a small region of the night sky over three
hours and look for something that moves. The many billions of stars and galaxies
visible in the sky appear stationary, while satellites, planets, asteroids, and comets
appear to move. The image below shows the three frames taken the night of October
21st, 2003 where we found the new planet. Can you find the moving object?

15. The area of sky shown here is approximately 0.015% of the amount of sky that we
look at every night, but even though we survey vast regions of the sky per night, it is
still going to take us about 5 years to look at all of the sky visible from Palomar
Observatory.
Happily for us (and our families) much of the work is done by computers. The
telescope is robotically controlled and sends its data to Pasadena every morning
where it is searched by a bank of 10 computers at Caltech. Each morning the
computers find approximately 100 potentially-moving objects that a human has to
look at. The vast majority are some flaw in the camera and are not real solar system
objects, but, occasionally, as seen above, a real object makes its presence known.
Because the new dwarf planet is so far away it is moving slower than most of the
objects that we find. It is moving so slowly, in fact, that our computers didn't notice
it the first time around! We began a special reanalysis a year later to specifically look
for very distant objects. This reanalysis found the new planet at 11:20AM PST on

16. January 5th 2005, almost 1 1/2 years after the initial data were obtained. Note that
initial reports suggested that the discovery date was January 8th. We apologize for
the mistake; it was caused because of the craziness surrounding the first day of
announcement. We didn't have time to check our notes and apparently our
memories are not as good as they used to be.
What is the real name going to be?
this part is obviously out of date. the answer to the question? Eris
When a new object is discovered the International Astronomical Union (IAU) gives it
a temporary designation based on the date it was first seen. Thus 2003 UB313 can be
decoded to tell you that the data from which the object was discovered was obtained
in the second half of October 2003. Next, depending on what the object is, the
discoverers propose a certain type of permanent name.
Interestingly, there are no actual rules for how to name a planet (presumably
because no one expected there to be more). All of the other planets are named for
Greek or Roman gods, so an obvious suggestion is to attempt to find such a name for
the new planet. Unfortunately, most of the Greek or Roman god names (particularly
those associated with creation, which tend to be the major gods) were used back
when the first asteroids were being discovered. If a name is already taken by an
asteroid, the IAU would not allow that name to be used again. One such particularly
apt name would have been Persephone. In Greek mythology Persephone is the
(forcibly abducted) wife of Hades (Roman Pluto) who spends six months each year
underground close to Hades. The new planet is on an orbit that could be described
in similar terms; half of the time it is in the vicinity of Pluto and half of the time
much further away. Sadly, the name Persephone was used in 1895 as a name for the
399th known asteroid. The perhaps more appropriate Roman version of the name,
Proserpina, was used even earlier for the 26th known asteroid. The same story can
be told for almost any other Greek or Roman god of any consequence. One exception
to this name depletion is the Roman god Vulcan (Greek Haphaestus), the god of fire.
Astronomers have long reserved that term, however, for a once hypothetical (now
known to be nonexistent) planet closer to the sun than Mercury (god of fire, near the
sun, good name). We would not want to use such a name to describe such a cold
body as our new planet!
Is this object really a planet or a dwarf planet? Is Pluto a planet? What makes a
planet?

17. note that all of this is out of date as of August 2006!
Even after all of these years of debate on the subject of whether or not Pluto should
be considered a planet, astronomers appear no closer to agreement. I wrote
extensively about this at the time of the discovery of Sedna in March 2004. My
thoughts have evolved since then, so it might be amusing to see what I said 1 1/2
years ago. I have been heavily influenced by writing a scientific review article this
summer on the topic of "What is a planet?" with my colleague Gibor Basri at U.C.
Berkeley who I thank for his insights. The main stumbling block in defining planets
in our solar system is that, scientifically, it is quite clear that Pluto should certainly
not be put in the same category as the other planets. Some astronomers have rather
desperately attempted to concoct solutions which keep Pluto a planet, but none of
these are at all satisfactory, as they also require calling dozens of other objects
planets. While people are perhaps prepared to go from 9 to 10 planets when
something previously unknown is discovered, it seems unlikely that many people
would be happy if astronomers suddenly said "we just decided, in fact, that there are
23 planets, and we decided to let you know right now." There is no good scientific
way to keep Pluto a planet without doing serious disservice to the remainder of the
solar system.
Culturally, however, the idea that Pluto is a planet is enshrined in a million different
ways, from plastic placemats depicting the solar system that include the nine
planets, to official NASA web sites, to mnemonics that all school children learn to
keep the nine planets straight, to U.S. postage stamps. Our culture has fully
embraced the idea that Pluto is a planet and also fully embraced the idea that things
like large asteroids and large Kuiper belt objects are not planets.
In my view scientists should not be trying to legislate an entirely new definition of
the word "planet." They should be trying to determine what it means. To the vast
majority of society, "planet" means those large objects we call Mercury through
Pluto. We are then left with two cultural choices. (1) Draw the line at Pluto and say
there are no more planets; or (2) Draw the line at Pluto and say only things bigger
are planets. Both would be culturally acceptable, but to me only the second makes
sense for what I think we mean when we say the word planet. In addition, the
second continues to allow the possibility that exploration will find a few more
planets, which is a much more exciting prospect than that suggested by the first
possibility. We don't think the number of planets found by the current generation of
researchers will be large. Maybe one or two more. But we think that letting future
generations still have a shot at planet-finding is nice.

18. Astronomers tend to dislike this solution as it is clearly non-scientific. The best
analogy I can come up with, though, is with the definition of the word "continent."
The word sound like it should have some scientific definition, but clearly there is no
way to construct a definition that somehow gets the 7 things we call continents to be
singled out. Why is Europe called a separate continent? Only because of culture. You
will never hear geologists engaged in a debate about the meaning of the word
"continent" though. When geologists talk about the earth and its land masses they
define precisely what they are talking about; they say "continental crust" or
"continental drift" or "continental plates" but almost never "continent." Astronomers
need to learn something from the geologists here and realize that there are a few
things -- like continents and planets -- to which people have large emotional
attachments, and they should not try to quash that attachment.
Thus, we declare that the new object, with a size larger than Pluto, is indeed a planet.
A cultural planet, a historical planet. I will not argue that it is a scientific planet,
because there is no good scientific definition which fits our solar system and our
culture, and I have decided to let culture win this one. We scientists will continue
our debates, but I hope we are generally ignored.
How was the planetary status be decided?
The above gives my personal view on how to resolve the planetary status. The
official decision will come from the International Astronomical Union. We had
hoped for a timely decision but we instead appear to be stuck in committee limbo.
Here is the story, as best I can reconstruct it from the hints and rumors that I hear: