3. Meaning of Holy
Verse•The deeds of those who
disbelieve their Lord are like
ashes blown away by the wind
on a stormy day. They will
not be able to gain anything
out of what they did. That is
the wandering away from the
path.
5. Reward of your good actions and
deeds absolutely depends on
believing in existence of Allah.
Denying the lord of whole
universe is part of hypocrisy,
disbeliever of God has no
realization about himself and he
is totally ignorant from his self
dignity and his title of exalted
creature. as mentioned the holy
Quran:
7. Meaning of Holy Verse
• Allah is the One who has
subjected for you the sea, so
that the ships may sail in it
with His command, and so
that you may seek His grace,
and so that you became
grateful.
8. •And He has subjected for
you whatever there is in the
heavens and whatever there
is in the earth, all from His
own. Surely in this, there
are signs for a people who
reflect.
AL_JATHIAH:12,13
10. Meaning of Holy
Verses•Allah is the One who created the
heavens and the earth and sent
down water from the sky, then
brought forth therewith
sustenance for you out of the
produce, and subjected the ships
for you so that they may sail in the
sea with His command, and
subjected for you the rivers
11. And He subjected for you
the sun and the moon,
moving constantly, and
subjected for you the day
and the night, and He
gave you whatever you
asked for.
12. And if you count the
bounties of Allah, you
cannot count them
all. Surely, man is
very unjust, very
ungrateful.
AL_ABRAHEEM:32,33,3
13. LOGIC OF ATHEISTS AND MATERIALIST
One of the major obstacles
faced by many a men in
accepting the concept of a
Universal God is that they
cannot see Him and
therefore do not have a
rational argument to prove
the existence of God.
14. • They believe in the direct or
observable argument or
primary rationalism and not
the unseen or inferential
argument or secondary
rationalism. This is contrary
to the fact today.
15. OBJECTION ON THEIR ARGUMENTS
Human knowledge has
two different phases: the
pre-Einstein period and
the post-Einstein period.
In the pre-Einstein
period, knowledge was
confined to the macro or
material world, which
was observable and
measurable. So
16. •, it was generally held that
everything, which has a
real existence, should also
be observable. Anything,
which could not be
observed, had no real
existence. This meant that
only the seen world was
real and what was unseen
17. This concept created the
theory that is generally
called logical positivism.
It means that the only
valid logical argument is
one that is demonstrable
in material terms;
otherwise it is simply a
baseless claim, and not a
valid argument.
18. •But, in the post-Einstein
period, in the early years
of the 20th century, when
the atom was split, the
whole situation changed.
After the splitting of the
atom, matter as a solid
substance, disappeared
19. It was replaced by
the micro-world,
beyond the atomic
world, where
everything was
reduced to unseen
waves – neither
20. •This changing situation
compelled the
philosophers and the
scientists to revise logical
criteria. It has now
become an accepted fact
that inferential argument
is as valid as direct
argument.
21. Present-day science
includes so many things,
such as electrons, the
law of gravity, etc., all
of which are non-
material in nature. They
cannot be observed, but
every scientist believes
in their existence,
22. • forthesimplereasonthat, although
wecannot seethesethings directly,
wecanseetheireffect. Forexample,
afallingapple, inthecaseof gravity.
Webelieveintheexistenceof all
thesethings, not byobservationbut
bytheirresult, inotherwords, byway
of indirect knowledgeorinferential
argument.
23. This change in human knowledge
also changed the theory of logic.
Now it is well established in
science that inferential
argument is as valid as direct
argument. In the pre-Einstein
era, unbelievers held that the
concept of God pertains to the
unseen world. And since no
direct argument was available
to bear this out,
24. •belief in God was held to
be illogical and all the
relevant indirect
arguments were
considered scientifically
invalid, since they were
inferential in nature.
25. •But now the whole
situation has changed.
Nothing is observable. So
the existence of anything
can be established only by
means of inferential
argument, rather than by
direct argument.
26. Scientific Proofs of the Existence of God
• 01:Existence of the universe
• 02:System of the universe
27. 01:Existence of the universe
The concept of God is naturally embedded
in the minds of people. It is however
covered with veils of confusion. It is voice
of our nature, belief in Allah, has no need
to prove its actualization through
evidences and proofs, He is evident.
Every things is mirror of existence of Allah.
28. 02:System of the universe
How it is possible to think
that the balance in this
world came about by
chance, while
extraordinary harmony of
nature is observable even
with naked eyes?
29. •it is the most unreasonable
claim to say that the universe,
has come into being on its
own. While all celestial &
terrestrial bodies are loudly
calling for their creator. having
observed and seen the
universe, our nature compels
us to believe in Allah and
designer who controls the