3. Copyright law: legal concept,
enabling content creators to
control the use and
dissemination of their content.
(Melinte & Jalbã, 2014).
4. Unauthorised file sharing technologies enable content piracy and inhibit users to get the
legal access to the content and thus impacting the income potential of the artists.
(Bowrey & Rimmer, 2002).
Originally, copyright was considered by government to control publishing.
Copyright is automatically assigned when content is created and shared, proving that
content belongs to the creator and does not have any fees or charge.
(Melinte & Jalbã, 2014).
7. INTERNET
A sharing platform.
Fosters participation.
Encourages peer to peer networks.
Promotes creativity.
8. Copyright inhibits people from creating new works. Considering deficiencies of
copyright, Lawrence Lessig founded an organisation called Creative Commons in 2001
that enables content-creators to license their works as open instead of constraints.
(Books and arts: Killing creativity; copyright law; 2004)
According to Lessig "A society that defends the ideals of free culture must preserve
precisely the opportunity for new creativity to threaten the old”
(Books and arts: Killing creativity; copyright law; 2004)
10. Creative Commons provide various license
options to authors, to guard copyright
protection for their creative works.
(O'Sullivan, 2008)
11. Creative Commons allows designers, writers,
videographers and web developers to use content
free of charge, when attributed.
(Cousins, 2014)
Creative Commons are legal
documents in a form of
contract.”
Creative Commons does not
stop licensing the content rather
encourages content creators to
allow access to their content
using different licences that can
be downloaded from the
website.
(O'Sullivan, 2008)
12. Creative Commons does not
does not pose any threat to
existence of copyright law rather
depends on it.
(O'Sullivan, 2008)
The content under creative commons is protected
by copyright law and can be used under some
licences.
(Cousins, 2014)
The use of Creative Commons licences does not
avert the owners of the content from getting credits
for their works and from earning money.
(O'Sullivan, 2008)
13. Creative Commons does not intend to revolutionize
copyright rather try to create a balance between privacy
and a total renunciation of ownership.
(O'Sullivan, 2008)
14. Bowrey, K., & Rimmer, M. (2002). Rip, Mix, Burn: The Politics
of Peer to Peer and Copyright Law. First Monday, 7(8).
doi:10.5210/fm.v7i8.974
Books and arts: Killing creativity; copyright law; (2004). The
Economist, 371, 90-82. Retrieved from
http://search.proquest.com.dbgw.lis.curtin.edu.au/docview
/224014842?accountid=10382
Cousins, C. (2014). The simple guide to Creative Commons
resources. Retrieved from
https://designshack.net/articles/business-articles/the-
simple-guide-to-creative-commons-resources/
Melinte, I., & Jalbã, L. G. (2014). Copyright laws effects on
encouraging creativity in the european union. Calitatea, 15,
11-16. Retrieved from
http://search.proquest.com.dbgw.lis.curtin.edu.au/docview
/1534112296?accountid=10382
15. O'Sullivan, M. (2008). Creative Commons and contemporary
copyright: A fitting shoe or "a load of old cobblers"?. First
Monday, 13(1). doi:10.5210/fm.v13i1.2087
Thibodeau, P. (2002). DMCA. Computerworld, 36(49), 41.
Retrieved from
http://search.proquest.com.dbgw.lis.curtin.edu.au/docview
/216098355?accountid=10382
Samuelson, P. (2007). Does copyright law need to be
reformed? Vol. 50, pp 19-23. Retrieved from
http://cacm.acm.org.dbgw.lis.curtin.edu.au/magazines/20
07/10/5540-does-copyright-law-need-to-be-
reformed/fulltext