Lingo

•

0 likes•352 views

M

This is just a rubric snapshot to make sure we all have the same visual representation.

Levels of Performance
Criteria | Dimensions
Beginning to develop
Progressing toward
the standard
Meets the standard Exceeds the standard
Application 30%
Connections between
stance/argument & evidence
Lack of connection
between stance on
issue & evidence
Developing
connections between
argument & evidence
Clear connections
between argument &
evidence
Highly persuasive connections
between argument & evidence
Predicts & draws conclusions from
evidence
Under-developed
ability to predict
conclusions
Developing ability to
synthesize & draw
conclusions
Developed ability to
synthesize & draw
conclusions
Highly skilled at synthesizing &
predicts creatively
Processing Skills 30% Category for criteria (optional)
Consideration of argument
Considers only one
position
Developing an
understanding of
multiple viewpoints
Illustrates the issue
from various
viewpoints
Considers multiple sides &
logically defends position
Evaluation of sources
Sources lacking
authority and currency
Includes some credible
sources, but relies
heavily on the internet
Includes current and
authoritative sources
Uses only reliable sources
after establishing their
authority and currency
Organization of content
Essay is lacking an
organizational
structure
Under developed
organization hinders
persuasiveness
Well developed
organization promotes
the argument
Highly developed and logical
organization solidifies the
argument
Instructions 10%
Variety & number of sources
Used only a minimum
of internet sources
Used some credible
sources from multiple
media
Used credible sources
in a variety of media
Proved & used highly credible
sources from all media
Formatting of content
Instructions were not
followed; improper
APA
Formatting confuses
reader; APA errors
Proper, professional
formatting; proper APA
Reflection 20%
Ability to assess personal
performance
Under-developed
ability to assess
Developing ability to
assess & recommend
improvements
Developed ability to
assess & recommend
improvements
Objectively assesses &
incorporates various
recommendations

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

ThinkPairShare learning strategy

ThinkPairShare learning strategy

ThinkPairShare learning strategy

Simos Retalis, University of Piraeus

20 teaching ideas

20 teaching ideas

20 teaching ideas

Dr. Dheeraj Mehrotra (National Awardee)

Active learning

Active learning

Active learning

Think pair share ppt EDWF 4100/5100

Think pair share ppt EDWF 4100/5100

Think pair share ppt EDWF 4100/5100

Robert C. Kirkpatrick II

Inclusive Learning

Inclusive Learning

Inclusive Learning

Cooperative Learning

Cooperative Learning

Cooperative Learning

Cooperative Learning

Cooperative Learning

Cooperative Learning

Catherine Agustin

Inclusive Education

Inclusive Education

Inclusive Education

Interactive Teaching Strategies

Interactive Teaching Strategies

Interactive Teaching Strategies

Teaching strategies

Teaching strategies

Teaching strategies

Creative Peer and Teacher Led Strategies that Promote Active Learning and Enh...

Creative Peer and Teacher Led Strategies that Promote Active Learning and Enh...

Creative Peer and Teacher Led Strategies that Promote Active Learning and Enh...

Effective teaching strategies

Effective teaching strategies

Effective teaching strategies

manish shrivastava

Viewers also liked (12)

ThinkPairShare learning strategy

ThinkPairShare learning strategy

ThinkPairShare learning strategy

20 teaching ideas

20 teaching ideas

20 teaching ideas

Active learning

Active learning

Active learning

Think pair share ppt EDWF 4100/5100

Think pair share ppt EDWF 4100/5100

Think pair share ppt EDWF 4100/5100

Inclusive Learning

Inclusive Learning

Inclusive Learning

Cooperative Learning

Cooperative Learning

Cooperative Learning

Cooperative Learning

Cooperative Learning

Cooperative Learning

Inclusive Education

Inclusive Education

Inclusive Education

Interactive Teaching Strategies

Interactive Teaching Strategies

Interactive Teaching Strategies

Teaching strategies

Teaching strategies

Teaching strategies

Creative Peer and Teacher Led Strategies that Promote Active Learning and Enh...

Creative Peer and Teacher Led Strategies that Promote Active Learning and Enh...

Creative Peer and Teacher Led Strategies that Promote Active Learning and Enh...

Effective teaching strategies

Effective teaching strategies

Effective teaching strategies

Similar to Lingo

This assignment requires you to write a 1000-word academic essay addressing the following question: "Examine the differences between management and leadership. What are the characteristics of a socially responsible leader?" Note: You must use all of the mandatory readings listed below in your essay and include them in your reference list. How to become an inspirational leader, and what to avoid (Bonau 2017). Leadership versus management: Whats the difference? (Kotterman 2006). The human side: Understanding the difference between management and leadership (Maccoby 2000). How authentic leadership influences team performance: The mediating role of team reflexivity (Lyubovnikova et al. 2015) Introduction Your introduction should include: a few general statements related to the topic that are supported by the mandatory readings through the use of in-text citations (these statements should clarify your interpretation of the question) a thesis statement that presents your position on the topic an outline of the main points that support your position. Body paragraphs The body of your essay should include: a series of logically developed arguments that support your position each argument and/or sub-argument is supported by the mandatory readingsthis shown through in-text citations and examples from the readings topic sentences and cohesive text that aids with the logical flow of the arguments presented. Conclusion Your conclusion should: summarise the main points discussed in the body of the essay restate the thesis statement includes a final comment that does not introduce any new ideas. Reference in Harvard WesternSydU style. Reference list Your reference list should be in alphabetical order by authors last name and includes only the resources that are used in the body of the text (i.e. in-text citations). Note: the reference list is not included in the word count. Application of concepts (25%) Little understanding of concepts or just mentioning terms without exhibiting understanding. Uses terms relevant to the question but shows only a generalist understanding of concepts. Uses concepts with good understanding; makes links with the issues involved. Accomplished discussion of relevant concepts, with insightful use of concepts in analysis. Excellent integration of concepts through discussion of their value, limitations or relevance. Substantiation of arguments and overall quality of discussion (25%) Little discussion or argument; simply stating/restating without explanation. Poor use of argument; unconvincing explanations to substantiate points discussed. Minimal but convincing use of argument to substantiate the points under discussion. Relevant and convincing use of arguments to substantiate the points under discussion. Relevant and convincing use of arguments to substantiate points; integrating different perspectives. Critical thinking and analysis (25%) Poor attempt to be analytical or critical; strong tendency to be descriptive. Evidence of some.

This assignment requires you to write a 1000word academic e.pdf

This assignment requires you to write a 1000word academic e.pdf

This assignment requires you to write a 1000word academic e.pdf

1 persuasive logic

1 persuasive logic

1 persuasive logic

1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% 2 Less than Satisfactory 74.00% 3 Satisfactory 79.00% 4 Good 87.00% 5 Excellent 100.00% 70.0 %Content 40.0 %Quality Tool Analysis A quality tool analysis that includes a problem statement, root-cause analysis, and explanation of which quality tools you used to identify and vet the problem is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant. An explanation of quantitative and qualitative tools you used and a summary of how you arrived at the problem is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant. A quality tool analysis that includes a problem statement, root-cause analysis, and explanation of which quality tools you used to identify and vet the problem makes weak connections with several gaps in presentation. An explanation of quantitative and qualitative tools you used and a summary of how you arrived at the problem makes weak connections with several gaps in presentation. Supporting sources are present and that show limited understanding of the content. A quality tool analysis that includes a problem statement, root-cause analysis, and explanation of which quality tools you used to identify and vet the problem makes connections at a cursory level and contains minimal gaps. An explanation of quantitative and qualitative tools you used and a summary of how you arrived at the problem is at a cursory level and makes connections containing minimal gaps. Supporting sources are present and show some understanding of the content. A quality tool analysis that includes a problem statement, root-cause analysis, and explanation of which quality tools you used to identify and vet the problem is clear and integrated, and makes meaningful connections with no gaps. An explanation of quantitative and qualitative tools you used and a summary of how you arrived at the problem is clear and integrated, and makes meaningful connections with no gaps. Supporting sources are present that illustrate the understanding of the content. A quality tool analysis that includes a problem statement, root-cause analysis, and explanation of which quality tools you used to identify and vet the problem is thorough and well integrated and makes meaningful connections with no gaps. An explanation of quantitative and qualitative tools you used and a summary of how you arrived at the problem is thorough and well integrated, and makes meaningful connections with no gaps. Supporting sources are present that illustrate a deep understanding of the content. 30.0 %Stakeholder Analysis A stakeholder analysis that includes a power interest grid and a summary of all considerations for all stakeholders is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant. A stakeholder analysis that includes a power interest grid and a summary of all considerations for all stakeholders makes weak connections with several gaps in presentation. Supporting sources are present and that show limited understanding of the content. A stakeholder analysis that includes a power interest grid and a summary of all considerations.

1Unsatisfactory0.002Less than Satisfactory74.003.docx

1Unsatisfactory0.002Less than Satisfactory74.003.docx

1Unsatisfactory0.002Less than Satisfactory74.003.docx

Rubric Discussion of Which Employees May Need Coaching and Which Are Performing at Acceptable Levels No discussion of which employees may need coaching and which are performing at acceptable levels is presented. A discussion of which employees may need coaching and which are performing at acceptable levels is presented, but the discussion is not connected to the data given. A cursory discussion of which employees may need coaching and which are performing at acceptable levels is presented. The discussion is loosely connected to the data given. A thorough discussion of which employees may need coaching and which are performing at acceptable levels is presented. The discussion connects reasonably to the data given. A thorough discussion of which employees may need coaching and which are performing at acceptable levels is presented. The discussion is clearly, logically, and directly connected to the data given. 25.0 %Explanation of Which Principles of Consulting and Coaching Would most Effectively be Applied to Improve Organizational Performance Benchmarks C 4.3: Apply principles of interpersonal and group consulting and coaching to improve organizational performance. No explanation of which principles of consulting and coaching would most effectively be applied to improve organizational performance is presented. A vague explanation of which principles of consulting and coaching would most effectively be applied to improve organizational performance is presented, but information presented is not based on scholarly sources. A cursory explanation of which principles of consulting and coaching would most effectively be applied to improve organizational performance is presented. Information presented is from both non-scholarly and scholarly sources. A thorough explanation of which principles of consulting and coaching would most effectively be applied to improve organizational performance is presented. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. A thorough explanation of which principles of consulting and coaching would most effectively be applied to improve organizational performance is presented. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. 15.0 %Regression Equation and Justification of Hiring Decision No regression equation and justification of hiring decision are presented. The regression is not clearly visible. A vague justification of hiring decision is presented, but information presented is not based on scholarly sources. The regression equation is clearly stated. A cursory justification of hiring decision is presented. Information presented is from both non-scholarly and scholarly sources. The regression equation is clearly stated. A thorough justification of hiring decision is presented. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. The regression equation is clearly stated. A thorough and insightful and justification of hiring decision is presented. Information presented is from current schola ...

RubricDiscussion of Which Employees May Need Coaching and Which .docx

RubricDiscussion of Which Employees May Need Coaching and Which .docx

RubricDiscussion of Which Employees May Need Coaching and Which .docx

ACC202 - Management Accounting Trimester 3 2018 GROUP ASSIGNMENT Student Id Number Student Name Student Id Number Student Name Student Id Number Student Name Student Id Number Student Name Student Id Number Student Name Question Student Mark Total Assignment /100 Assessment Mark (out of 20) /20 Overview Group Assignment: 3-5 members (or as agreed with your Tutor) Nature of Assignment: Essay (2000 – 2500 words) Date Due: Week 10(Friday 10pm) Worth: 20% Submission Method: via Moodle / Turnitin (printed copy to Tutor if requested by Tutor) Instructions · This is a Group Assignment of 3-5 members (or as agreed with your Tutor). The groups must be finalised prior to the Mid-trimester test in Week 6. · Write each of your Student Names and Numbers at the top of this page IN THE BOX PROVIDED. Ensure you identify who your group lead is. The Group lead will be responsible for all correspondence with the Tutor as well as the assignment final submission. 1) Essay Questions: What are mid-market innovators and what are the overall strategies and pricing approaches used by these innovators in order to develop their business. Why are mid-market innovators successful? Provide examples where appropriate. Based on your analysis of mid-market innovators in the first part of the essay question, what challenges are there for incumbent companies? 2) Essay Structure: The following structure is provided to assist you in developing your response. 1) Executive Summary (an overall statement of no more than 200-250 words outlining the topic, approach, summary of key findings and conclusion) 2) Introduction (this should state what the purpose of the report is, what Accounting theme is being explored, which company is being reviewed (if applicable), which standards / criteria are being applied etc.) 3) Literature Review (this is where you include a summary of the literature you reviewed to develop your understanding of the topic and formulate your recommendations) 4) Analysis (this is the main body) 5) Summary of Findings (this section highlights the key findings from your analysis) 6) Recommendations (this section summarises YOUR key recommendations based on your findings and emphasises your JUDGEMENT) 7) Conclusion (this section should reflect upon what you stated in the introduction i.e. what you have done and what you found. The conclusion is about closing the analysis and NOT introducing new material.) 8) Referencing (Harvard Anglia compliant) You should also use the attached RUBRIC (refer section 3) to self-assess how well your Essay reaches the targeted outcomes. Please feel free to bring a draft copy to your Tutor to help you assess progress. 3. Analysis Rubric Criteria HD (>95%) HD (85-95%) Distinction (75-84%) Credit (65-74%) Pass (50-64%) Fail (40-50%) Fail (<40%) Executive Summary (5%) Presented a logical and well-structured executive summary which clearly reflects the assignment requirements, .

ACC202 - Management AccountingTrimester 3 2018 GROUP ASSIGNMENT.docx

ACC202 - Management AccountingTrimester 3 2018 GROUP ASSIGNMENT.docx

ACC202 - Management AccountingTrimester 3 2018 GROUP ASSIGNMENT.docx

bartholomeocoombs

Top of Form reviewing the Literature and Theory 1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% 2 Less than Satisfactory 65.00% 3 Satisfactory 75.00% 4 Good 85.00% 5 Excellent 100.00% 70.0 %Content 20.0 %Literature Review and Supporting Argument References are not categorized in an appropriately logical manner. Little or no information is given regarding the value of the references in validating the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project. Presentation does an incomplete job of categorizing project references. Review does a superficial or incomplete job of describing the value of references in validating the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project. Presentation categorizes information from project references appropriately and incorporates the supporting evidence into an argument that validates the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project. Presentation clearly categorizes and incorporates applicable information from project references and applies the basic research well towards validating the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project. Collection of references covers most aspects of the project in adequate depth. Presentation utilizes the categorized information from the references in a clear and comprehensive manner to clearly validate and support the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project; Collection of references is comprehensive and supports all aspects of the project. 20.0 %Critical Analysis of Supporting Data Argument is more of a literature review than a supporting, critical analysis of the reference contributions to the project. Argument does not utilize reference information adequately to provide support for why the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project are valid. Argument is somewhat vague or incomplete. Argument uses relevant findings from supporting references to present a basic position as to why the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project are valid. Minimal acceptable details are provided and are mostly applicable to the subject. Argument uses reference material in an appropriate manner to convince the reader that the problem, purpose, and possible solution are clearly valid. Subject knowledge appears to be good. Argument is convincing and clearly articulated with adequate supporting references to validate the problem, purpose, and solution of the project. Argument demonstrates thorough subject knowledge and understanding. 20.0 %Incorporation of a Valid Theory to Support the Project A valid theory to be incorporated in support of the project is not identified or explained, or a theory is improperly stated. Subject knowledge is not demonstrated or is poorly demonstrated. Identification and explanation of a valid theory to incorporate in support of the project is somewhat vague or incomplete. A valid theory is identified and a basic explanation is provided of how the theory is incorporated in support of the project. Minimal acceptable details are pr ...

Top of Formreviewing the Literature and Theory 1Unsatisfac.docx

Top of Formreviewing the Literature and Theory 1Unsatisfac.docx

Top of Formreviewing the Literature and Theory 1Unsatisfac.docx

Writing The Proposal

Writing The Proposal

Writing The Proposal

Benchmark Assignment - Spiritual Needs Assessment and Reflection 1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% 2 Less Than Satisfactory 65.00% 3 Satisfactory 75.00% 4 Good 85.00% 5 Excellent 100.00% 70.0 %Content 40.0 %Tool for Assessing the Spiritual Needs of Patients CONHCP: 5.2 Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients show little to no relevance to the experiences of patients. A transcript of the interview is either missing or not relevant. Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients is present but lacks focus on experiences of patients. A clear transcript of the interview is provided. Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients is present and focuses on experiences of patients. A clear transcript of the interview is provided. Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients is present and focuses on experiences of patient. The tool uses reliable methods for gathering data. A clear transcript of the interview is provided. Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients is present and focuses on experiences of patients. The tool uses effective methods for gathering data that produces the results intended. A clear transcript of the interview is provided. 30.0 %Analysis of Interview Experience An analysis of the interview experience shows little to no relevance to the assignment instructions. An analysis of the interview experience is included but addresses a few of the points included in the assignment instructions. An analysis of the interview experience is included and addresses most of the points included in the assignment instructions. An analysis of the interview experience is included and addresses all of the points included in the assignment instructions. An analysis of the interview experience is included and addresses all of the points included in the assignment instructions. The analysis shows a deep understanding of the connections. 20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness 7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. They are descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. 8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but ...

Benchmark Assignment - Spiritual Needs Assessment and Reflection .docx

Benchmark Assignment - Spiritual Needs Assessment and Reflection .docx

Benchmark Assignment - Spiritual Needs Assessment and Reflection .docx

ASSESSMENT DETAILS Individual Portfolio (3000 words) 1- Identify a multi-national organization. Critically analyse the strategy of the organization utilizing the range of strategy content. Please also identify the competitive advantage of your selected organisation. 2- Identify a significant event, challenge, transformation or merger/acquisition that affected the organization. Please make sure you take into consideration the current pandemic and other contemporary drivers of change. 3- Analyse how the challenge was managed by the organization, with a focus on leadership, culture, and the human relations aspects of the context. 4- Discuss how the organization’s strategy impacted the management of the challenge. Furthermore, critically discuss the impact of the challenge on the organization’s strategy. Additional information on the assessment: You are encouraged to search for potential organizations early and ensure that you have access to adequate data sources for completing your report, before you finalize your choice. This assessment will be graded using the following criteria: (i) Critical analysis of the strategy of the organization, applying theories and conceptual frameworks covered in the module (30%) (ii) Critical application of leadership and management of change models/theories to analyze the context in question (30%) (iii) Discussion and synthesis of the strategy and change aspects of the selected challenge; evidence of wider reading critically applied in your analyses (30%) (iv) Presentation, structure, grammar and referencing (10%) The following Learning Outcomes are demonstrated via this assessment Knowledge 1. Discuss the nature and roots of competitive advantage 2. Critically discuss the dilemmas inherent in integrating ethics and social responsibility into organisational strategy 3. Critically evaluate different models/theories and perspectives on leadership and the management of change 4. Discuss the dilemmas inherent in strategy development and change management Thinking skills 5. Appraise the strategic situation of a business or business unit on the basis of complex, incomplete and ambiguous information Subject-based practical skills 6. Determine the appropriate leadership and change management approach for a particular organisational context 7. Appraise strategic proposals and develop contextually appropriate alternatives Skills for life and work (general skills) 8. Communicate effectively on strategy, leadership and change management to both expert and non-expert audiences Assessment Criteria GENERIC Command of the Subject DESCRIPTORS Subject Specific Skills Scholarly and & Practices Professional Skills & Attributes 90-100% Demonstrates a breadth and depth of substantive knowledge that is excellent and informed by the highest level of scholarship Excellent integration of the full range of appropriate principles, theories, evidence and techniques Goes beyond the material displayi.

ASSESSMENT DETAILSIndividual Portfolio (3000 words)1- Ide.docx

ASSESSMENT DETAILSIndividual Portfolio (3000 words)1- Ide.docx

ASSESSMENT DETAILSIndividual Portfolio (3000 words)1- Ide.docx

galerussel59292

Top of Form ment Project: Phase I 1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% 2 Less than Satisfactory 74.00% 3 Satisfactory 79.00% 4 Good 87.00% 5 Excellent 100.00% 70.0 %Content 40.0 %Quality Tool Analysis A quality tool analysis that includes a problem statement, root-cause analysis, and explanation of which quality tools you used to identify and vet the problem is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant. An explanation of quantitative and qualitative tools you used and a summary of how you arrived at the problem is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant. A quality tool analysis that includes a problem statement, root-cause analysis, and explanation of which quality tools you used to identify and vet the problem makes weak connections with several gaps in presentation. An explanation of quantitative and qualitative tools you used and a summary of how you arrived at the problem makes weak connections with several gaps in presentation. Supporting sources are present and that show limited understanding of the content. A quality tool analysis that includes a problem statement, root-cause analysis, and explanation of which quality tools you used to identify and vet the problem makes connections at a cursory level and contains minimal gaps. An explanation of quantitative and qualitative tools you used and a summary of how you arrived at the problem is at a cursory level and makes connections containing minimal gaps. Supporting sources are present and show some understanding of the content. A quality tool analysis that includes a problem statement, root-cause analysis, and explanation of which quality tools you used to identify and vet the problem is clear and integrated, and makes meaningful connections with no gaps. An explanation of quantitative and qualitative tools you used and a summary of how you arrived at the problem is clear and integrated, and makes meaningful connections with no gaps. Supporting sources are present that illustrate the understanding of the content. A quality tool analysis that includes a problem statement, root-cause analysis, and explanation of which quality tools you used to identify and vet the problem is thorough and well integrated and makes meaningful connections with no gaps. An explanation of quantitative and qualitative tools you used and a summary of how you arrived at the problem is thorough and well integrated, and makes meaningful connections with no gaps. Supporting sources are present that illustrate a deep understanding of the content. 30.0 %Stakeholder Analysis A stakeholder analysis that includes a power interest grid and a summary of all considerations for all stakeholders is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant. A stakeholder analysis that includes a power interest grid and a summary of all considerations for all stakeholders makes weak connections with several gaps in presentation. Supporting sources are present and that show limited understanding of the content. A stakeholder analysis that includes a power interest grid ...

Top of Formment Project Phase I1Unsatisfactory0.002.docx

Top of Formment Project Phase I1Unsatisfactory0.002.docx

Top of Formment Project Phase I1Unsatisfactory0.002.docx

Assessment Criteria (Tutors will highlight the appropriate comments under each marking criteria) Weighting 25% 25% 40% 10% Grade boundaries DEMONSTRATE RESEARCH INTO AND UNDERSTANDING OF APPROPRIATE LITERATURE USE OF EVIDENCE FROM THE CASE TO DEMONSTRATE UNDERSTANDING OF THE ORGANISATION INTEGRATION OF UNDERSTANDING OF ORGANISATION AND APPROPRIATE LITERATURE PRESENTATION AND WRITING 80%+ Excellent understanding of the relevant theory as well as its limitations; and contrasting theory. Excellent use of evidence from the case to demonstrate understanding of the organisation at a sufficiently deep level to enable analysis and evaluation. Balances understanding of organisation at a broad (holistic) level with enough detail to support points made in discussion. Excellent integration of appropriate theory, with understanding of the organisation. Development of a strong coherent argument. Good use of contrasting theory to provide alternative view of case study. Different views are then synthesised to provide strong coherent conclusion. Excellent narrative. Structure is very well organised with a clear line of thought that is easy to follow and has an obvious conclusion. Citations match references and are appropriately used. 70-79% Very good understanding of the relevant theory and its limitations. Introduces contrasting theory. Very good use of evidence from the case to demonstrate understanding of the organisation at a sufficiently deep level to enable analysis and evaluation. Very good integration of appropriate theory, with understanding of the organisation. Development of a strong coherent argument. The insights about the case study firm that result from application of the theory to the case study are identified, discussed and conclusions drawn. Use of contrasting theory to provide alternative view of case study. Very strong narrative. Structure is well organised with a clear line of thought that is easy to follow and has an obvious conclusion. Citations match references and are appropriately used. 60-69% Good understanding of the relevant theory. Some recognition of its limitations. Good use of evidence from the case to demonstrate understanding of the organisation at a sufficient level to enable analysis in depth. Good integration of appropriate theory with understanding of the organisation. Development of a coherent argument. Addresses the purpose of the assignment. Demonstrates good judgement and support for findings. Strong narrative. Clear, orthodox structure. References mostly accurately cited and appropriately recorded. 50-59% Reasonable understanding of the relevant theory. Reasonable use of evidence from the case to demonstrate understanding of the organisation. Reasonable linkage of appropriate theory with understanding of the organisation. Partial or incomplete argument. Generally addresses the purpose of the assignment. Reasonable judgement. Sometimes lapses into description rather than analysis. Reasonable narrat.

Assessment Criteria (Tutors will highlight the appropriate comme.docx

Assessment Criteria (Tutors will highlight the appropriate comme.docx

Assessment Criteria (Tutors will highlight the appropriate comme.docx

galerussel59292

iMBAX-628 Unit 5 Case Study: Budgeting A new company, Apex, was started on December 1, 2013. Below are their sales forecast and other financial information. Based on this information, provide an financial analysis that includes the following: 1) Prepare an income statement budget. 2) Prepare a cash flow budget 3) Does the company have enough capitalization? 4) Which month does the company achieve positive cash flow? Sales Forecast: January 2014 $100,000 February $150,000 March $200,000 April $200,000 May $300,000 June $300,000 July $300,000 …Each month thereafter Salaries: $30,000/month Facilities: $10,000/month Admin: $10,000/month Cost of Goods Sold: 60% of sales COGS cash disbursement 1 month prior to sale No cash sales. Receivables are collected as follows: 70% collected the following month of sales 20% two months after the sale 10% three months after the sale Company has $250,000 in cash currently and a line of credit for $200,000 Rubric for Case Study Assignments Criterion Proficient to Exemplary (90–100) Proficient to Development Needed (80–89) Development Needed to Deficient (70–79) Deficient ( Below 60 - 69 ) Score Completeness Complete in all respects; reflects all requirements Complete in most respects; reflects most requirements Incomplete in many respects; reflects few requirements Incomplete in most respects; does not reflect requirements Understanding Demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s) Demonstrates an accomplished understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s) Demonstrates an acceptable understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s) Demonstrates an inadequate understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s) Analysis, evaluation, and recommendations Presents an insightful and thorough analysis of all issues identified; includes all necessary financial calculations Presents a thorough analysis of most issues identified; includes most necessary financial calculations Presents a superficial analysis of some of the issues identified; omits necessary financial calculations Presents an incomplete analysis of the issues identified Makes appropriate and powerful connections between the issues identified and the strategic concepts studied in the reading; demonstrates complete command of the strategic concepts and analytical tools studied Makes appropriate connections between the issues identified and the strategic concepts studied in the reading; demonstrates good command of the strategic concepts and analytical tools studied Makes appropriate but somewhat vague connections between the issues and concepts studied in the reading; demonstrates limited command of the strategic concepts and analytical tools studied Makes little or no connection between the issues identified and t ...

iMBAX-628 Unit 5 Case Study BudgetingA new company, Ape.docx

iMBAX-628 Unit 5 Case Study BudgetingA new company, Ape.docx

iMBAX-628 Unit 5 Case Study BudgetingA new company, Ape.docx

BUSI 443 Case Study 3 Instructions: Recruiting and Selecting High-Level Managers through the Internet You will complete the “Recruiting and Selecting High-Level Managers through the Internet” case in the Nkomo et al. text (#35 on pp. 112–113, 2011). You will write a 3–5-page essay (total does not include title page or reference page) that answers the 4 questions (1–4) on p. 113. Do not simply answer the questions. This is an essay and must be written to include an introduction, body, and conclusion. It may prove helpful to use the topic of the questions (advantages and disadvantages of internet recruitment and selection, the three approaches to online recruiting and selection, etc.) as section headers in your essay. Your response must be supported by at least 2 peer-reviewed resources. These resources must have been published within the last 5 years. Do not use other textbooks. The essay must be written in current APA format and include a title page, reference page, and in-text citations. Note: This case study will not use the “small groups” described on p. 113 to answer the 4 questions. Submit your assignment through SafeAssign as a draft to check for plagiarism before submitting it for points. Data Analysis Plan Details: After the data are collected and before program evaluators meet with management, the data must be analyzed to ensure that it will provide the right type of information for the evaluation. Of vital importance is ensuring that the data fit the indicators identified for analysis. Then, it must be decided how the data and results will be presented. It is important to present the information in ways that make it easy to understand, demonstrate relationships to other data, and allow the information to be used to support decision-making processes. In this assignment, you will write about the methods of analyzing and reporting the study data. General Requirements: Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment: · Locate the data collection procedures you developed in Module 5 to use as reference material for this assignment. · Locate the mission statement and program description from the existing organization that you referenced in Module 2 to use as examples for this assignment. · Instructors will be using a grading rubric to grade the assignments. It is recommended that learners review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment in order to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment. · Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center. · This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included. · You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Directions: Based on ...

BUSI 443Case Study 3 Instructions Recruiting and Selecting High.docx

BUSI 443Case Study 3 Instructions Recruiting and Selecting High.docx

BUSI 443Case Study 3 Instructions Recruiting and Selecting High.docx

Warning You do not have permissions to perform this activity Assignment Week 10 | Diversity in the Health Care Organization Details: 1) Providers must learn new tools to eliminate disparities, build trust with patients, and understand how international biases and pre-established stereotypes affect quality of care. Write a paper (1,000-1,250 words) that identifies and defines various tools and measurements that can be used to measure the effectiveness of diversity programs and policies established by the organization. 2) Address how each of the following must be considered when considering how to implement an environment of diversity: a) Government regulations. b) Social pressures. c) Industry and company ethical codes. d) Tension between personal standards and the goals of the organization. 3) Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. 4) This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment. Top of Form Please Note: Assignment will not be submitted to the faculty member until the "Submit" button under "Final Submission" is clicked. New Attempt Bottom of Form Title Attached Documents Turnitin Report Similarity Index Final Submission Click 'New Attempt' to start assignment or attach documents Error Details Top of Form Bottom of Form Top of Form Bottom of Form Top of Form Apply Rubrics Addressing Diversity 1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% 2 Less than Satisfactory 65.00% 3 Satisfactory 75.00% 4 Good 85.00% 5 Excellent 100.00% 100.0 %Content 40.0 %In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. Does not demonstrate understanding of the issues surrounding diversity, including the implications. Does not demonstrate critical thinking and analysis of the situation, and does not develop effective answers to the questions, with rationale. Demonstrates only minimal understanding diversity. Demonstrates only minimal abilities for critical thinking and analysis of the case study, and develops weak answers to the questions, with minimal rationale Demonstrates knowledge of issues surrounding diversity, but has some slight misunderstanding of the implications. Provides a basic idea of critical thinking and analysis for the questions, answers, and rationale. Does not include examples or descriptions. Demonstrates acceptable knowledge of the issues surrounding diversity (in your own words). Develops an acceptable response and rationale for it. Utilizes some examples. Demonstrates thorough knowledge of the issues surrounding diversity and their implications. Clearly answers the questions and develops a very strong rationale. Introduces appropri.

WarningYou do not have permissions to perform this activityA.docx

WarningYou do not have permissions to perform this activityA.docx

WarningYou do not have permissions to perform this activityA.docx

There are two broad approaches to financing health care: a market-based approach and a government-financed approach. For each approach, answer the following questions: Who is provided access? How much coverage is provided? How are the services paid for? How does reimbursement apply? Are there limitations on care? What guides care decisions for patients? What is the quality of services? Are there competitive options? How much are prevention and wellness emphasized? How are health care costs managed and controlled? How are medical advances generated? How is health care reform established? In addition, offer any further advantages and/or disadvantages you have gleaned from your research. The information above can be presented in one of the following formats as long as there are full sentences and examples: Short-answer format Outline Table Next, in a short narrative (one for each approach), explain what component you feel requires the most reform in order to finance a health care system that covers all, or most, people. Justify your rationale. APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Health Care Financing 1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% 2 Less Than Satisfactory 65.00% 3 Satisfactory 75.00% 4 Good 85.00% 5 Excellent 100.00% 80.0 % Content 25.0 % Health Care Financing: Market-Based Includes little knowledge about each component. Subject knowledge is not evident. Analysis of the criteria is not outlined or outlined poorly. Does not distinguish between advantages and disadvantages. Includes little knowledge about some components with few supporting details and examples. Little subject knowledge is evident. Ignores or superficially evaluates the criteria. Draws unwarranted or fallacious conclusions. Recognizes advantages and disadvantages without providing rationale. Includes knowledge about each component with supporting details and examples. Some subject knowledge is evident. Surface-level evaluation of the content is offered. Describes basic advantages and disadvantages. Includes essential knowledge about each component with supporting details and examples. Subject knowledge appears to be good. Analysis is direct, competent, and appropriate for the criteria. Covers each component in depth with extensive details and examples. Subject knowledge is excellent. Thoughtfully analyzes and evaluates major points of the criteria. Draws warranted, judicious, nonfallacious conclusions. Identifies the salient arguments (reasons and claims) and advantages and disadvantages, providing explicit examples and details. 25.0 % Health Care Financing: Government-Financed Includes little knowledge about each component. Subject knowledge is not evident. Analysis of the criteri.

There are two broad approaches to financing health care a market-ba.docx

There are two broad approaches to financing health care a market-ba.docx

There are two broad approaches to financing health care a market-ba.docx

CJ 675 Milestone O ne Guidelines and Rubric Overview: For this milestone, you will prepare a draft of your final project that thoroughly addresses the items listed in the prompt. To complete this assignment, you must complete the textbook reading assigned in Module Five and review the materials presented in Modules One through Five. As a criminal justice leader, you will often be faced with making decisions that reflect not only on you but on your department as a whole. We often use tools like statistics and crime trends to offer the best possible route to finding a solution and ultimately making a decision. The field of criminal justice is constantly changing; new laws, policies, and procedures make situational, evidence-based decision making a complicated daily task. And it is nearly impossible to make an informed decision without first researching the issues at play and leveraging the power of available data to determine the right solution for each particular situation and organization. You will assume the role of a leader within a criminal justice organization of your choice. Based on your chosen scenario, you will be presented with a specific challenge that is emblematic of wider issues in contemporary criminal justice. Prompt: Your task for Milestone One is to complete the Introduction, Theory and Methods, and Literature Review sections of your final project. You will be given information (including this data set) for your scenario, but you must also conduct your own research on comparable organizations and trends in the field to determine opportunities and external threats. The following critical elements must be specifically addressed: I. Introduction: In this section, establish a context that provides your audience with any background information that is necessary for understanding your proposal. II. Theory and Methods: In this section, explain the theoretical frameworks that underpin your analysis and proposed solution. A. Identify foundational criminology theories that apply to your chosen organization and the challenge it faces. Draw connections between the theories and your specific context that will ultimately support your analysis and your proposed solution. B. Examine the strategic methods used by leaders in the field for approaching problems such as yours. For example, what do the current best practices in the field suggest in terms of researching and investigating the issue? Highlight methods that support your proposal. C. Similarly, identify best practices in the field for communicating with diverse audiences. Illustrate these practices with specific examples that will ultimately support your communication plan. III. Literature Review: In this section, present all of the evidence that you have analyzed (including the provided data and your independent research) and that will support your proposed solution. A. Data Analysis: Using the provided data, determine any patterns and trends ...

CJ 675 Milestone O ne

CJ 675 Milestone O ne

CJ 675 Milestone O ne

Victorian Institute of Technology Pty Ltd ABN: 41 085 128 525 RTO No: 20829 CRICOS Provider Number: 02044E Victorian Institute of Technology Pty Ltd ABN: 41 085 128 525 RTO No: 20829 TEQSA ID: PRV14007 CRICOS Provider Code: 02044E Assignment – Report Guidelines Research papers must be typed, or word processed, and referenced as per VIT guidelines. A variety of references from textbooks, journal articles and the internet would be well regarded. There should be headings, an introduction (not more than 10% of the total) and a conclusion (not more than 10% of the total).Assessment Criteria 1. Research Assignment/Research Report : 2800 – 3000 words (penalties may be applied for word counts +/- 10%) 2. To be submitted on or before the due date on MOODLE. Penalty for late submission is 10% of the paper’s worth deducted for each day late.Marking Criteria (from 30%) 3% (front page, illustrations, colour, headings) 4% (should explain the rationale and give an overview) 10% (quality, relevance and conciseness of discussion/facts) 10% (what I have learnt and its relevance to my profession) 3% (quality/variety/relevance/topical)Referencing Guide A guide to referencing sources used in assignments · All sources used in assignments, essays, reports and theses must be acknowledged in the text of your document giving the author’s name followed by the publication date (these are called ‘in-text citations’) · A ‘bibliography’ or ‘reference list’ at the end of your document contains the full details of all the in-text citations, arranged alphabetically · Referencing is necessary to avoid plagiarism, to verify quotations, and to enable readers to identify and consult any item to follow-up a cited author’s argumentsReferring a Book The details required, in order, are: · name(s) of author(s), editor(s), compiler(s) or the institution responsible · year of publication · title of publication and subtitle if any (all titles must be underlined or italicised with · sentence style capitalisation as below) · series title and individual volume, if any · edition, if other than the first · publisher · place of publication · page number(s) if applicable Referring an Article The details required, in order are: · name(s) of author(s) of the article · year of publication · title of article, in single quotation marks and sentence style capitalisation as below · title of periodical (underlined or italicised with headline style capitalisation as below) · volume number · issue (or part) number · page number(s) Referring Electronic Sources This could include sources from full text compact disk products, electronic journals or other sources from the Internet. The basic form of the citations follow the principles listed for print sources: · name(s) of author(s) or the organization responsible for document, web page or site · year of publication of document, creation of page/site or date last revised · Note: if you cannot establish the date of pub ...

Victorian Institute of Technology Pty LtdABN 41 085 128 525.docx

Victorian Institute of Technology Pty LtdABN 41 085 128 525.docx

Victorian Institute of Technology Pty LtdABN 41 085 128 525.docx

Due Date: Sep 30, 2015 23:59:59 Max Points: 190 Details: The human experience is composed of an endless series of decisions. Humans make thousands of conscious and unconscious decision every day. This assignment will allow you to research some of the factors that influence decision making. General Requirements: Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment: • Instructors will be using a grading rubric to grade the assignments. It is recommended that learners review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment in order to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment. • Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center. • This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included. Directions: Write a paper of 1,000-1,250 words in which you discuss the effects of categorization and social influences on decision making. Include the following: 1. A summary of the cognitive processes used to understand ourselves and others. 2. A discussion of how categorization specifically influences individual decision making. 3. A discussion of how social influences specifically affect individual decision making. Factors that Influence Decision Making 1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% 2 Less Than Satisfactory 74.00% 3 Satisfactory 79.00% 4 Good 87.00% 5 Excellent 100.00% 70.0 %Content 25.0 %Summary of the Cognitive Processes Used to Understand Ourselves and Others Benchmarks C 3.5: Analyze cognitive processes used to understand ourselves and others. No summary of the cognitive processes used to understand ourselves and others is presented. A vague summary of the cognitive processes used to understand ourselves and others is presented, but information presented is not based on scholarly sources. A cursory summary of the cognitive processes used to understand ourselves and others is presented. Information presented is from both nonscholarly and scholarly sources. A thorough summary of the cognitive processes used to understand ourselves and others is presented. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. A thorough summary of the cognitive processes used to understand ourselves and others is presented. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. 20.0 %Discussion of How Categorization Specifically Influences Individual Decision Making No discussion of how categorization specifically influences individual decision making is presented. A vague discussion of how categorization specifically influences individual decision making is presented, but information presented is not based on scholarly sources. A cursory discussion of how categorization specifically influences individual decision making is presented. Information presented is fro ...

Due Date Sep 30, 2015 235959 Max Points 190Details.docx

Due Date Sep 30, 2015 235959 Max Points 190Details.docx

Due Date Sep 30, 2015 235959 Max Points 190Details.docx

MGT1100 Final Examination T3 2020 Page 1 of 3 MGT1100 Final Exam Assessment Term 3 2020 Assessment Task 3: Final Exam Weighting: 50% Due Date: January 31, 2021. Late penalty is 5% for each day after the due date. Word Limit: 2050 words Submission style: All assignments should be submitted online through the MGT1100 Moodle site. Total Grade: 10x 5= 50 Marks Instructions: Your Task: Develop a detailed report based on All five questions listed in this document. In your report you need to address ALL Five Discussion Questions listed below. Each Question response should be around 400 words. Please use theories from the textbook to support/ justify your argument. It is recommended that you read various academic papers on the website in the library at Ozford Institute, magazine articles, before writing this report. You will be expected to have consulted as many sources (at least 10) such as journal articles, books, market reports etc. to write the report (i.e. support your arguments with theories and market figures, tables etc, we shall discuss the formatting in class). Remember to reference this articles in-text as you use them and add them immediately to your reference list at the end of your report. The referencing style used by Ozford Institute of Higher Education is Harvard Referencing style (For example see Moodle). MGT1100 Final Examination T3 2020 Page 2 of 3 Discussion Questions: Question 1: Conduct research (using books, journals and the Internet) on three of the following business or political leaders, and comment on whether they all have the same leadership style. • Mark Zuckerberg • Angela Merkel • Malcolm Turnbull • Steven Jobs • Julie Bishop • Donald Trump or Barack Obama Question 2: Research the Fortune set of ‘Top 100 employers to work for’ from the Internet. Identify and discuss some of the most important human resource management practices of these companies? Question 3: Describe an example of a service experience you have had in which excellent customer service was given and contrast it with one where you received poor service. What resulting approach to repurchasing from those suppliers will you have? Examine the management practice(s) you consider might have led to the difference in your service experience? Question 4: Describe a company or product that you like because it is innovative. Examine the factors that would make this an attractive place to work or product to purchase. Support your response with theories from the textbook and scholarly articles. Question 5: Select an organisation with which you are familiar. Discuss its strengths and weaknesses in relation to the core principles described in the chapter 21: Making effective Management Happen of the textbook. How could the organisation’s performance on two of the core principles be improved? Discuss. Report structure Executive Summary Table of Contents Introduct ...

MGT1100 Final Examination T3 2020 Page 1 of 3 MGT1100

MGT1100 Final Examination T3 2020 Page 1 of 3 MGT1100

MGT1100 Final Examination T3 2020 Page 1 of 3 MGT1100

Top of Form ViewG View Grading Rubrics Counselor Ethics and Responsibilities Paper 1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% 2 Less Than Satisfactory 74.00% 3 Satisfactory 79.00% 4 Good 87.00% 5 Excellent 100.00% 70.0 %Content 15.0 %Counselor Values Analysis of the criteria is not outlined or outlined poorly. Fails to formulate and clearly express own point of view. Ignores or superficially evaluates the ethical issues. Formulates a vague and indecisive point of view. Surface level of evaluation of the ethical issues is offered. Minimal rationale presented. Expresses a preference in a personal point of view, but lacks details. Discusses a counseling plan for the client, but lacks supporting rationale. Describes the process/plan in which counseling would or would not be provided, considering all ethical implications. Subject knowledge appears to be good. Formulates a clear and precise personal point of view. Includes essential knowledge about personal values and attitudes with supporting details and resources. Comprehensively describes the process/plan in which counseling would or would not be provided, considering all ethical implications. Subject knowledge is excellent. Formulates a clear and precise personal point of view. Clearly describes personal values and attitudes in depth with extensive details and resources. 20.0 %Client Rights Includes little knowledge about the topic. Subject knowledge is not evident. Includes little knowledge about the topic with few supporting details. Little subject knowledge is evident. Ignores or superficially evaluates the criteria. Lists the five ethical principles and discusses how they relate to client rights. Explains how these rights will be incorporated into professional practice with minimal details and/or rationale. Some subject knowledge is evident. Surface level of evaluation of the content is offered. Presents a detailed outline of the relationship between the five ethical principles and how they relate to client rights. Explains how these principles will be incorporated into professional practice with supporting details, and/or rationale. Informed consent is explicitly and thoroughly addressed in this description. Subject knowledge appears to be good. Analysis is direct, competent, and appropriate for the criteria. Presents a full detailed in-depth description of the relationship between the five ethical principles and client rights. Explain show these principles will be incorporated into professional practice with extensive details and/or rationale. Informed consent is explicitly and thoroughly addressed in this description. Subject knowledge is excellent. Thoughtfully analyzes and evaluates major points of the criteria. 20.0 %Responsibility to Warn and Protect Includes little knowledge about the topic. Subject knowledge is not evident. Factors involved in decision making are vague or not present. Includes little knowledge about the topic with few supporting details. Little subject knowledge is evi ...

Top of FormViewG View Grading RubricsCounselor Ethics and Re.docx

Top of FormViewG View Grading RubricsCounselor Ethics and Re.docx

Top of FormViewG View Grading RubricsCounselor Ethics and Re.docx

Similar to Lingo (20)

This assignment requires you to write a 1000word academic e.pdf

This assignment requires you to write a 1000word academic e.pdf

This assignment requires you to write a 1000word academic e.pdf

1 persuasive logic

1 persuasive logic

1 persuasive logic

1Unsatisfactory0.002Less than Satisfactory74.003.docx

1Unsatisfactory0.002Less than Satisfactory74.003.docx

1Unsatisfactory0.002Less than Satisfactory74.003.docx

RubricDiscussion of Which Employees May Need Coaching and Which .docx

RubricDiscussion of Which Employees May Need Coaching and Which .docx

RubricDiscussion of Which Employees May Need Coaching and Which .docx

ACC202 - Management AccountingTrimester 3 2018 GROUP ASSIGNMENT.docx

ACC202 - Management AccountingTrimester 3 2018 GROUP ASSIGNMENT.docx

ACC202 - Management AccountingTrimester 3 2018 GROUP ASSIGNMENT.docx

Top of Formreviewing the Literature and Theory 1Unsatisfac.docx

Top of Formreviewing the Literature and Theory 1Unsatisfac.docx

Top of Formreviewing the Literature and Theory 1Unsatisfac.docx

Writing The Proposal

Writing The Proposal

Writing The Proposal

Benchmark Assignment - Spiritual Needs Assessment and Reflection .docx

Benchmark Assignment - Spiritual Needs Assessment and Reflection .docx

Benchmark Assignment - Spiritual Needs Assessment and Reflection .docx

ASSESSMENT DETAILSIndividual Portfolio (3000 words)1- Ide.docx

ASSESSMENT DETAILSIndividual Portfolio (3000 words)1- Ide.docx

ASSESSMENT DETAILSIndividual Portfolio (3000 words)1- Ide.docx

Top of Formment Project Phase I1Unsatisfactory0.002.docx

Top of Formment Project Phase I1Unsatisfactory0.002.docx

Top of Formment Project Phase I1Unsatisfactory0.002.docx

Assessment Criteria (Tutors will highlight the appropriate comme.docx

Assessment Criteria (Tutors will highlight the appropriate comme.docx

Assessment Criteria (Tutors will highlight the appropriate comme.docx

iMBAX-628 Unit 5 Case Study BudgetingA new company, Ape.docx

iMBAX-628 Unit 5 Case Study BudgetingA new company, Ape.docx

iMBAX-628 Unit 5 Case Study BudgetingA new company, Ape.docx

BUSI 443Case Study 3 Instructions Recruiting and Selecting High.docx

BUSI 443Case Study 3 Instructions Recruiting and Selecting High.docx

BUSI 443Case Study 3 Instructions Recruiting and Selecting High.docx

WarningYou do not have permissions to perform this activityA.docx

WarningYou do not have permissions to perform this activityA.docx

WarningYou do not have permissions to perform this activityA.docx

There are two broad approaches to financing health care a market-ba.docx

There are two broad approaches to financing health care a market-ba.docx

There are two broad approaches to financing health care a market-ba.docx

CJ 675 Milestone O ne

CJ 675 Milestone O ne

CJ 675 Milestone O ne

Victorian Institute of Technology Pty LtdABN 41 085 128 525.docx

Victorian Institute of Technology Pty LtdABN 41 085 128 525.docx

Victorian Institute of Technology Pty LtdABN 41 085 128 525.docx

Due Date Sep 30, 2015 235959 Max Points 190Details.docx

Due Date Sep 30, 2015 235959 Max Points 190Details.docx

Due Date Sep 30, 2015 235959 Max Points 190Details.docx

MGT1100 Final Examination T3 2020 Page 1 of 3 MGT1100

MGT1100 Final Examination T3 2020 Page 1 of 3 MGT1100

MGT1100 Final Examination T3 2020 Page 1 of 3 MGT1100

Top of FormViewG View Grading RubricsCounselor Ethics and Re.docx

Top of FormViewG View Grading RubricsCounselor Ethics and Re.docx

Top of FormViewG View Grading RubricsCounselor Ethics and Re.docx

More from Mohawk College

Open Textbook Adoption Fair

Open Textbook Adoption Fair

Open Textbook Adoption Fair

Open Textbook Adoptions

Open Textbook Adoptions

Open Textbook Adoptions

Curator

Hmns10082 Final Class

Hmns10082 Final Class

Hmns10082 Final Class

Harm reduction ppt excerpt

Harm reduction ppt excerpt

Harm reduction ppt excerpt

Worst Presentation Ever

Worst Presentation Ever

Worst Presentation Ever

Strengths intro

Strengths intro

Strengths intro

Jigsaw instructional strategy

Jigsaw instructional strategy

Jigsaw instructional strategy

Rubrics for TWTI

Rubrics for TWTI

Rubrics for TWTI

Intro to rubrics

Intro to rubrics

Intro to rubrics

Intro to rubrics

Intro to rubrics

Intro to rubrics

Copyright introduction for blended learning intensive

Copyright introduction for blended learning intensive

Copyright introduction for blended learning intensive

Finding library resources for elearn

Finding library resources for elearn

Finding library resources for elearn

LOR how to publish

LOR how to publish

LOR how to publish

Ethics presentation from Saskatchewan RN Association

Ethics presentation from Saskatchewan RN Association

Ethics presentation from Saskatchewan RN Association

Museum of Memories

Museum of Memories

Museum of Memories

More from Mohawk College (16)

Open Textbook Adoption Fair

Open Textbook Adoption Fair

Open Textbook Adoption Fair

Open Textbook Adoptions

Open Textbook Adoptions

Open Textbook Adoptions

Curator

Hmns10082 Final Class

Hmns10082 Final Class

Hmns10082 Final Class

Harm reduction ppt excerpt

Harm reduction ppt excerpt

Harm reduction ppt excerpt

Worst Presentation Ever

Worst Presentation Ever

Worst Presentation Ever

Strengths intro

Strengths intro

Strengths intro

Jigsaw instructional strategy

Jigsaw instructional strategy

Jigsaw instructional strategy

Rubrics for TWTI

Rubrics for TWTI

Rubrics for TWTI

Intro to rubrics

Intro to rubrics

Intro to rubrics

Intro to rubrics

Intro to rubrics

Intro to rubrics

Copyright introduction for blended learning intensive

Copyright introduction for blended learning intensive

Copyright introduction for blended learning intensive

Finding library resources for elearn

Finding library resources for elearn

Finding library resources for elearn

LOR how to publish

LOR how to publish

LOR how to publish

Ethics presentation from Saskatchewan RN Association

Ethics presentation from Saskatchewan RN Association

Ethics presentation from Saskatchewan RN Association

Museum of Memories

Museum of Memories

Museum of Memories

Recently uploaded

Klinik_ Apotek Onlin 085657271886 Solusi Menggugurkan Masalah Kehamilan Anda Jual Obat Aborsi Asli KLINIK ABORSI TERPEECAYA _ Jual Obat Aborsi Cytotec Misoprostol Asli 100% Ampuh Hanya 3 Jam Langsung Gugur || OBAT PENGGUGUR KANDUNGAN AMPUH MANJUR OBAT ABORSI OLINE" APOTIK Jual Obat Cytotec, Gastrul, Gynecoside Asli Ampuh. JUAL ” Obat Aborsi Tuntas | Obat Aborsi Manjur | Obat Aborsi Ampuh | Obat Penggugur Janin | Obat Pencegah Kehamilan | Obat Pelancar Haid | Obat terlambat Bulan | Ciri Obat Aborsi Asli | Obat Telat Bulan | Pil Aborsi Asli | Cara Menggugurkan Konten | Cara Aborsi Tuntas | Harga Obat Aborsi Asli | Pil Aborsi | Jual Obat Aborsi Cytotec | Cara Aborsi Sendiri | Cara Aborsi Usia 1 Bulan | Cara Aborsi Usia 2 Tahun | Cara Aborsi Usia 3 Bulan | Obat Aborsi Usia 4 Bulan | Cara Abrasi Usia 5 Bulan | Cara Menggugurkan Konten | Kandungan Obat Penggugur | Cara Menghitung Usia Konten | Cara Mengatasi Terlambat Bulan | Penjual Obat Aborsi Asli | Obat Aborsi Garansi | Kandungan Obat Peluntur | Obat Telat Datang Bulan | Obat Telat Haid | Obat Aborsi Paling Murah | Klinik Jual Obat Aborsi | Jual Pil Cytotec | Apotik Jual Obat Aborsi | Kandungan Dokter Abrasi | Cara Aborsi Cepat | Jual Obat Aborsi Bergaransi | Jual Obat Cytotec Asli | Obat Aborsi Aman Manjur | Obat Misoprostol Cytotec Asli. "APA ITU ABORSI" “Aborsi Adalah dengan membendung hormon yang di perlukan untuk mempertahankan kehamilan yaitu hormon progesteron, karena hormon ini dibendung, maka jalur kehamilan mulai membuka dan leher rahim menjadi melunak,sehingga mengeluarkan darah yang merupakan tanda bahwa obat telah bekerja || maksimal 1 jam obat diminum || PENJELASAN OBAT ABORSI USIA 1 _7 BULAN Pada usia kandungan ini, pasien akan merasakan sakit yang sedikit tidak berlebihan || sekitar 1 jam ||. namun hanya akan terjadi pada saatdarah keluar merupakan pertanda menstruasi. Hal ini dikarenakan pada usiakandungan 3 bulan,janin sudah terbentuk sebesar kepalan tangan orang dewasa. Cara kerja obat aborsi : JUAL OBAT ABORSI AMPUH dosis 3 bulan secara umum sama dengan cara kerja || DOSIS OBAT ABORSI 2 bulan”, hanya berbedanya selain mengisolasijanin juga menghancurkan janin dengan formula methotrexate dikandungdidalamnya. Formula methotrexate ini sangat ampuh untuk menghancurkan janinmenjadi serpihan-serpihan kecil akan sangat berguna pada saat dikeluarkan nanti. APA ALASAN WANITA MELAKUKAN ABORSI? Aborsi di lakukan wanita hamil baik yang sudah menikah maupun belum menikah dengan berbagai alasan , akan tetapi alasan yang utama adalah alasan-alasan non medis (termasuk aborsi sendiri / di sengaja/ buatan] MELAYANI PEMESANAN OBAT ABORSI SETIAP HARI, SIAP KIRIM KESELURUH KOTA BESAR DI INDONESIA DAN LUAR NEGERI. HUBUNGI PEMESANAN LEBIH NYAMAN VIA WA/: 085657271886

Jual Obat Aborsi Hongkong ( Asli No.1 ) 085657271886 Obat Penggugur Kandungan...

Jual Obat Aborsi Hongkong ( Asli No.1 ) 085657271886 Obat Penggugur Kandungan...

Jual Obat Aborsi Hongkong ( Asli No.1 ) 085657271886 Obat Penggugur Kandungan...

Accessible Digital Futures project (20/03/2024)

Accessible Digital Futures project (20/03/2024)

Accessible Digital Futures project (20/03/2024)

How to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POS

How to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POS

How to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POS

80 ĐỀ THI THỬ TUYỂN SINH TIẾNG ANH VÀO 10 SỞ GD – ĐT THÀNH PHỐ HỒ CHÍ MINH NĂ...

80 ĐỀ THI THỬ TUYỂN SINH TIẾNG ANH VÀO 10 SỞ GD – ĐT THÀNH PHỐ HỒ CHÍ MINH NĂ...

80 ĐỀ THI THỬ TUYỂN SINH TIẾNG ANH VÀO 10 SỞ GD – ĐT THÀNH PHỐ HỒ CHÍ MINH NĂ...

Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection

HMCS Max Bernays Pre-Deployment Brief (May 2024).pptx

HMCS Max Bernays Pre-Deployment Brief (May 2024).pptx

HMCS Max Bernays Pre-Deployment Brief (May 2024).pptx

Wizards are very useful for creating a good user experience. In all businesses, interactive sessions are most beneficial. To improve the user experience, wizards in Odoo provide an interactive session. For creating wizards, we can use transient models or abstract models. This gives features of a model class except the data storing. Transient and abstract models have permanent database persistence. For them, database tables are made, and the records in such tables are kept until they are specifically erased.

How to Create and Manage Wizard in Odoo 17

How to Create and Manage Wizard in Odoo 17

How to Create and Manage Wizard in Odoo 17

HMCS Vancouver Pre-Deployment Brief - May 2024 (Web Version).pptx

HMCS Vancouver Pre-Deployment Brief - May 2024 (Web Version).pptx

HMCS Vancouver Pre-Deployment Brief - May 2024 (Web Version).pptx

Spatium Project Simulation student brief

Spatium Project Simulation student brief

Spatium Project Simulation student brief

Association for Project Management

Basic Civil Engineering notes first year Notes Building notes Selection of site for Building Layout of a Building What is Burjis, Mutam Building Bye laws Basic Concept of sunlight ventilation in building National Building Code of India Set back or building line Types of Buildings Floor Space Index (F.S.I) Institutional Vs Educational Building Components & function Sills, Lintels, Cantilever Doors, Windows and Ventilators Types of Foundation AND THEIR USES Plinth Area Shallow and Deep Foundation Super Built-up & carpet area Floor Area Ratio (F.A.R) RCC Reinforced Cement Concrete RCC VS PCC

Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx

Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx

Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx

Beyond_Borders_Understanding_Anime_and_Manga_Fandom_A_Comprehensive_Audience_...

Beyond_Borders_Understanding_Anime_and_Manga_Fandom_A_Comprehensive_Audience_...

Beyond_Borders_Understanding_Anime_and_Manga_Fandom_A_Comprehensive_Audience_...

2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx

2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx

2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx

MaritesTamaniVerdade

Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit

Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit

Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit

UGC NET Paper 1 Mathematical Reasoning & Aptitude.pdf

UGC NET Paper 1 Mathematical Reasoning & Aptitude.pdf

UGC NET Paper 1 Mathematical Reasoning & Aptitude.pdf

Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx

Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx

Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx

VishalSingh1417

𝐋𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝐎𝐮𝐭𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐬: -Discern accommodations and modifications within inclusive classroom environments, distinguishing between their respective roles and applications. -Through critical analysis of hypothetical scenarios, learners will adeptly select appropriate accommodations and modifications, honing their ability to foster an inclusive learning environment for students with disabilities or unique challenges.

Understanding Accommodations and Modifications

Understanding Accommodations and Modifications

Understanding Accommodations and Modifications

Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024

Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024

Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024

Mehran University of Engineering & Technology, Jamshoro

Fostering Friendships - Enhancing Social Bonds in the Classroom

Fostering Friendships - Enhancing Social Bonds in the Classroom

Fostering Friendships - Enhancing Social Bonds in the Classroom

Pooky Knightsmith

How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17

How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17

How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17

Food safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdf

Food safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdf

Food safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdf

SKILL OF INTRODUCING THE LESSON MICRO SKILLS.pptx

SKILL OF INTRODUCING THE LESSON MICRO SKILLS.pptx

SKILL OF INTRODUCING THE LESSON MICRO SKILLS.pptx

Recently uploaded (20)

Jual Obat Aborsi Hongkong ( Asli No.1 ) 085657271886 Obat Penggugur Kandungan...

Jual Obat Aborsi Hongkong ( Asli No.1 ) 085657271886 Obat Penggugur Kandungan...

Jual Obat Aborsi Hongkong ( Asli No.1 ) 085657271886 Obat Penggugur Kandungan...

Accessible Digital Futures project (20/03/2024)

Accessible Digital Futures project (20/03/2024)

Accessible Digital Futures project (20/03/2024)

How to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POS

How to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POS

How to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POS

80 ĐỀ THI THỬ TUYỂN SINH TIẾNG ANH VÀO 10 SỞ GD – ĐT THÀNH PHỐ HỒ CHÍ MINH NĂ...

80 ĐỀ THI THỬ TUYỂN SINH TIẾNG ANH VÀO 10 SỞ GD – ĐT THÀNH PHỐ HỒ CHÍ MINH NĂ...

80 ĐỀ THI THỬ TUYỂN SINH TIẾNG ANH VÀO 10 SỞ GD – ĐT THÀNH PHỐ HỒ CHÍ MINH NĂ...

HMCS Max Bernays Pre-Deployment Brief (May 2024).pptx

HMCS Max Bernays Pre-Deployment Brief (May 2024).pptx

HMCS Max Bernays Pre-Deployment Brief (May 2024).pptx

How to Create and Manage Wizard in Odoo 17

How to Create and Manage Wizard in Odoo 17

How to Create and Manage Wizard in Odoo 17

HMCS Vancouver Pre-Deployment Brief - May 2024 (Web Version).pptx

HMCS Vancouver Pre-Deployment Brief - May 2024 (Web Version).pptx

HMCS Vancouver Pre-Deployment Brief - May 2024 (Web Version).pptx

Spatium Project Simulation student brief

Spatium Project Simulation student brief

Spatium Project Simulation student brief

Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx

Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx

Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx

Beyond_Borders_Understanding_Anime_and_Manga_Fandom_A_Comprehensive_Audience_...

Beyond_Borders_Understanding_Anime_and_Manga_Fandom_A_Comprehensive_Audience_...

Beyond_Borders_Understanding_Anime_and_Manga_Fandom_A_Comprehensive_Audience_...

2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx

2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx

2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx

Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit

Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit

Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit

UGC NET Paper 1 Mathematical Reasoning & Aptitude.pdf

UGC NET Paper 1 Mathematical Reasoning & Aptitude.pdf

UGC NET Paper 1 Mathematical Reasoning & Aptitude.pdf

Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx

Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx

Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx

Understanding Accommodations and Modifications

Understanding Accommodations and Modifications

Understanding Accommodations and Modifications

Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024

Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024

Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024

Fostering Friendships - Enhancing Social Bonds in the Classroom

Fostering Friendships - Enhancing Social Bonds in the Classroom

Fostering Friendships - Enhancing Social Bonds in the Classroom

How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17

How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17

How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17

Food safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdf

Food safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdf

Food safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdf

SKILL OF INTRODUCING THE LESSON MICRO SKILLS.pptx

SKILL OF INTRODUCING THE LESSON MICRO SKILLS.pptx

SKILL OF INTRODUCING THE LESSON MICRO SKILLS.pptx

Lingo

1. Levels of Performance Criteria | Dimensions Beginning to develop Progressing toward the standard Meets the standard Exceeds the standard Application 30% Connections between stance/argument & evidence Lack of connection between stance on issue & evidence Developing connections between argument & evidence Clear connections between argument & evidence Highly persuasive connections between argument & evidence Predicts & draws conclusions from evidence Under-developed ability to predict conclusions Developing ability to synthesize & draw conclusions Developed ability to synthesize & draw conclusions Highly skilled at synthesizing & predicts creatively Processing Skills 30% Category for criteria (optional) Consideration of argument Considers only one position Developing an understanding of multiple viewpoints Illustrates the issue from various viewpoints Considers multiple sides & logically defends position Evaluation of sources Sources lacking authority and currency Includes some credible sources, but relies heavily on the internet Includes current and authoritative sources Uses only reliable sources after establishing their authority and currency Organization of content Essay is lacking an organizational structure Under developed organization hinders persuasiveness Well developed organization promotes the argument Highly developed and logical organization solidifies the argument Instructions 10% Variety & number of sources Used only a minimum of internet sources Used some credible sources from multiple media Used credible sources in a variety of media Proved & used highly credible sources from all media Formatting of content Instructions were not followed; improper APA Formatting confuses reader; APA errors Proper, professional formatting; proper APA Reflection 20% Ability to assess personal performance Under-developed ability to assess Developing ability to assess & recommend improvements Developed ability to assess & recommend improvements Objectively assesses & incorporates various recommendations