MGT1100 Final Examination T3 2020 Page 1 of 3 MGT1100 Final Exam Assessment Term 3 2020 Assessment Task 3: Final Exam Weighting: 50% Due Date: January 31, 2021. Late penalty is 5% for each day after the due date. Word Limit: 2050 words Submission style: All assignments should be submitted online through the MGT1100 Moodle site. Total Grade: 10x 5= 50 Marks Instructions: Your Task: Develop a detailed report based on All five questions listed in this document. In your report you need to address ALL Five Discussion Questions listed below. Each Question response should be around 400 words. Please use theories from the textbook to support/ justify your argument. It is recommended that you read various academic papers on the website in the library at Ozford Institute, magazine articles, before writing this report. You will be expected to have consulted as many sources (at least 10) such as journal articles, books, market reports etc. to write the report (i.e. support your arguments with theories and market figures, tables etc, we shall discuss the formatting in class). Remember to reference this articles in-text as you use them and add them immediately to your reference list at the end of your report. The referencing style used by Ozford Institute of Higher Education is Harvard Referencing style (For example see Moodle). MGT1100 Final Examination T3 2020 Page 2 of 3 Discussion Questions: Question 1: Conduct research (using books, journals and the Internet) on three of the following business or political leaders, and comment on whether they all have the same leadership style. • Mark Zuckerberg • Angela Merkel • Malcolm Turnbull • Steven Jobs • Julie Bishop • Donald Trump or Barack Obama Question 2: Research the Fortune set of ‘Top 100 employers to work for’ from the Internet. Identify and discuss some of the most important human resource management practices of these companies? Question 3: Describe an example of a service experience you have had in which excellent customer service was given and contrast it with one where you received poor service. What resulting approach to repurchasing from those suppliers will you have? Examine the management practice(s) you consider might have led to the difference in your service experience? Question 4: Describe a company or product that you like because it is innovative. Examine the factors that would make this an attractive place to work or product to purchase. Support your response with theories from the textbook and scholarly articles. Question 5: Select an organisation with which you are familiar. Discuss its strengths and weaknesses in relation to the core principles described in the chapter 21: Making effective Management Happen of the textbook. How could the organisation’s performance on two of the core principles be improved? Discuss. Report structure Executive Summary Table of Contents Introduct ...

1. MGT1100 Final Examination T3 2020 Page 1 of 3
MGT1100 Final Exam Assessment
Term 3 2020
Assessment Task 3: Final Exam
Weighting: 50%
Due Date: January 31, 2021. Late penalty is 5% for each day
after the due date.
Word Limit: 2050 words
Submission style: All assignments should be submitted online
through the MGT1100 Moodle
site.
Total Grade: 10x 5= 50 Marks
Instructions:
Your Task:
Develop a detailed report based on All five questions listed in
this document. In your report you need
to address ALL Five Discussion Questions listed below. Each
Question response should be around
400 words. Please use theories from the textbook to support/

2. justify your argument.
It is recommended that you read various academic papers on the
website in the library at Ozford
Institute, magazine articles, before writing this report. You will
be expected to have consulted as many
sources (at least 10) such as journal articles, books, market
reports etc. to write the report (i.e. support
your arguments with theories and market figures, tables etc, we
shall discuss the formatting in class).
Remember to reference this articles in-text as you use them and
add them immediately to your
reference list at the end of your report. The referencing style
used by Ozford Institute of Higher
Education is Harvard Referencing style (For example see
Moodle).
MGT1100 Final Examination T3 2020 Page 2 of 3
Discussion Questions:
Question 1:
Conduct research (using books, journals and the Internet) on
three of the following business or political
leaders, and comment on whether they all have the same
leadership style.
• Mark Zuckerberg

3. • Angela Merkel
• Malcolm Turnbull
• Steven Jobs
• Julie Bishop
• Donald Trump or Barack Obama
Question 2:
Research the Fortune set of ‘Top 100 employers to work for’
from the Internet. Identify and discuss
some of the most important human resource management
practices of these companies?
Question 3:
Describe an example of a service experience you have had in
which excellent customer service was
given and contrast it with one where you received poor service.
What resulting approach to
repurchasing from those suppliers will you have? Examine the
management practice(s) you consider
might have led to the difference in your service experience?
Question 4:
Describe a company or product that you like because it is
innovative. Examine the factors that would
make this an attractive place to work or product to purchase.
Support your response with theories from
the textbook and scholarly articles.

4. Question 5:
Select an organisation with which you are familiar. Discuss its
strengths and weaknesses in relation to
the core principles described in the chapter 21: Making
effective Management Happen of the textbook.
How could the organisation’s performance on two of the core
principles be improved? Discuss.
Report structure
Executive Summary
Table of Contents
Introduction
Response to each question
Conclusion – summaries all sections of the report
Referencing – You will be penalised if you do not provide
references. Minimum 3 academic
references and 5 business references. Please Harvard style of
referencing.
MGT1100 Final Examination T3 2020 Page 3 of 3

5. Assessment 3 Marking Guide (RUBRIC): – Individual Final
Assessment (50%)
Assessment
task criteria
Weight HD 80-100% D 70-79% C 60-69% P 50-59% F 0-49%
Knowledge &
understanding
30% Demonstrates
exemplary and
comprehensive
understanding of
concepts and the
context.
Demonstrates
comprehensive
understanding of
concepts and the
context.
Demonstrates
satisfactory
understanding of
concepts and the
context.
Demonstrates
emerging
understanding of
concepts and the
context.

6. Demonstrates
minimal
understanding of
concepts and the
context.
Critical analysis 30% Expert critical
analysis of
concepts with
excellent
integration of
theory and practice
and consistent
reference to
relevant literature.
Good critical
analysis
of concepts with
integration of
theory
and practice and
consistent
reference to
relevant literature.
Satisfactory critical
analysis of
concepts
and theory with
satisfactory
reference
to relevant
literature.

7. Demonstrates an
emerging
ability to critically
analyse
concepts and
theory with
acceptable
reference to
relevant literature.
Limited ability to
critically
analyse concepts
with little or
no reference to
relevant theory.
Logic and
structure
25% From the
introduction
to the conclusion
this assignment
holds the
reader’s attention,
demonstrates in-
depth
understanding of
presentation of
concepts and their
application/value
through logical
development of the
analysis and
conclusions. Topic

8. covered in depth in
a scholarly
manner.
From the
introduction
to the conclusion
the arguments are
well developed and
structured.
Concepts and their
application/value
are organised to
develop consistent
and logical
development of the
analysis and
conclusions.
From the
introduction to the
conclusion the
arguments are
satisfactorily
developed and
structured.
Concepts
and their
application/value
are
satisfactorily
organised to
develop a relatively
consistent and
logical
development of

9. analysis and
conclusions.
Consistent and
logical
development
of analysis and
conclusions not
fully
developed. The
introduction and
conclusion are
evident but limited.
Lack of introduction
and/or conclusion.
Arguments poorly
articulated and
analysed.
Research/
referencing
15% Expert scholarly
use of
a wide range of
relevant sources.
Expert and
consistent
paraphrasing,
referencing and
integration of
references.
Scholarly use of a
wide range of

10. relevant
sources. Good
paraphrasing,
referencing and
application of
references.
Wide use of mostly
relevant
references.
Satisfactory
application of
referencing.
Limited use of
relevant
references.
Some inaccuracies
in
referencing and
citations.
Inadequate use of
relevant
references.
Inaccuracies in, or
omission of,
references and
citations.
Total /100%
/50
Comments:

11. Your name
Professor Name
Course
Date
Paper Outline
Thesis:
I. Rough draft of introduction to essay/paper
II. First Major Point
A. Secondary point
B. Secondary point
C. Transition sentence into next paragraph
III. Second Major Point
A. Secondary point
B. Secondary point
C. Transition sentence into next paragraph
IV. Third Major Point

12. A. Secondary point
B. Secondary point
C. Transition sentence into next paragraph
(If there are more points, add them as items V, VI, etc.
appropriately)
3
V. Rough draft of conclusion of essay/paper
Works Cited
Livingston, James C. Anatomy of the Sacred: An Introduction to
Religion. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson/Prentice
Hall, 2009.
Rodrigues, Hillary, and John S. Harding. Introduction to the
Study of Religion. Routledge, 2009.