Faith And Authentic Faith

Faith And Authentic Faith
'Fellowship' and 'Community' are fundamental elements to the traditional Christian view attitude, by the fact that the role of the Church is to bring
people together and provides them with a sanctuary to express their beliefs. There is a psychological explanation for this, that we are at a lesser stage of
anxiety when we seek for belonging and acceptances from others, thus Kierkegaard argues that this leads to complacency. Kierkegaard further argues
that Authentic faith is an active faith in that the movements of faith are chosen again and again, thus Active faith is for the individual in their own
solitude. Inauthentic faith is inactive and complacent, therefore complacent faith is faith for comfort's sake and not faith in its truest sense. Hence,
comfort comes from the community, that of the Church and the concept that others believe what oneself also believes. To belief in the impossible is
not really a traditional Christian... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The absolute duty can then lead to what the universal ethical would forbid; this is observed with Abraham when he seems willing to sacrifice Isaac as he
displays the universally ethical expression for what he is doing; that of hate. But, if Abraham did indeed truly hate Isaac, then it would not be necessary
for God to have requested this of Abraham. It is indeed due, to Abraham's unconditional love for his only son Isaac, that makes his actions appear to
be a sacrifice. The sorrow and aguish in this paradox of faith, is what makes Abraham incapable of making himself fully understood, to
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

In Memoriam: Reinvention of Faith for the Scientific Age?...
In Memoriam is an elegy to Tennyson's friend Arthur Hallam, but bears the hallmark of its mid
nineteenth century context В– "the locus classicus of the science–and–religion debate."
Upon reflection, Hallam's tragic death has proved to be an event that provoked Tennyson's
embarkation upon a much more ambitious poetic project than conventional Miltonian elegy,
involving meditation upon the profoundest questions faced by mankind. Scientific
advancements, most notably in the fields of geology and biology, challenged the beliefs that
form the foundation of Christianity: the belief in a beneficent God responsible for creation and
ensuing superintendence and the belief in man's immortal soul. By the mid nineteenth ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The uncaring Divine
Being is "so careful of the type" (species) but not of the individual. The use of parison found in
those lines is repeated within Nature's dramatised voice in line six of LVI: "I bring to life, I
bring to death." The parison demonstrates Nature's failure to distinguish between the
concepts of life and death, just as she refuses to pay the same care to individual as the
species. Life and death become meaningless. The use of dramatised voice personalises the

issues. Here Nature is not a scientific system of laws but a consciously cruel being with a cold
biological perception of man which is demonstrated by line seven of LVI: "the spirit does but
mean the breath" В– rejecting any notion of spirit as a transcendent sacred entity, playing upon
the Latin translation of "spirit." The existence of eternal life separate from the body is denied.
Tennyson does not abolish faith in these passages, he reinvents his faith– one that is centred
upon depressing ditheistic belief.
Tennyson emerges from the spiritual desolation later in his journey in CXVIII. Here Tennyson
claims evolutionary theory for the faithful, using its scientific model to hypothesise a kind of
spiritual evolution. He applies the motif of constant physical development found in
evolutionary theory to a model

Evil: A Problem For The Traditional Conception Of God
Problem of Evil In our world, Evil is a problem that is present everywhere. So many people have been affected by evil in this world and it can be a very
sensitive subject. There are a lot of people that believe that God created evil but he did not create it, he tolerates it to be a part of our existence. Evil
exists because people let it exist. God just allows it to be in our world. Good and evil is something that has been a big discussion over time and how
it was even made. I will be discussing why evil exists, why evil can be a good thing, some solutions to evil, and why it is a problem for the traditional
conception of God.
Before I discuss the problems of evil, I thought I would talk about why evil exists. Why does evil exist? Evil exists ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In fact, most people know the Adam and Eve story. God created a tree of knowledge of good and evil and it is said that the tree that had these
delicious looking apples could not be eaten because it would make them too smart and intelligent. God told them they could eat anything else in
the garden and they still chose to eat an apple knowing they were not supposed to. God created this tree to have both good and evil in the world.
There was a serpent who told Adam and Eve to eat these apples sent by Satan. Since they ate the apples, he then banned them from the garden and
they started a life in the real world living without Gods help and learning of good and evil on their own. If God wanted man to be perfect, he
should have created a man without free will. Since we have free will, we have the power to make our own choices and do whatever we want. This
is just an example of what God was trying to prove and it showed that not everything can be perfect. God didn't create a perfect world because we are
not supposed to be perfect. We are supposed to make mistakes and learn from them on our

Sermon : Luke 13-1-9 The Rev Essay
Sermon: Luke 13–1–9The Rev. Dr. Dinah Dutta
"Return to the Lord your God, for he is gracious and merciful, slow to anger, and abounding in love" we sing this each Sunday during Lent in our
worship.
The message I want to share with you today talks about the two tragedies that happened in Jerusalem one in the temple and other in the pool of Siloam.
The first has to do with the story of the Roman governor Pilate mixing the blood of eighteen Galileans with their sacrifices. Were they greater sinners
than other Galileans? Here might be time for some righteous anger directed at the oppressive governor, but Jesus turns the question on the questioners,
and suggests that if they don't repent something similar might befall them. Then there's the story of a tower in Jerusalem that fell and killed people
who simply happened to be there. How can such things be explained?
Make us wonder, does bad things happen to bad people? Why often good and innocent people suffer? Jesus is asking us not to worry about Pilate and
all the things that come crashing down on our heads. Terrible things happen and don't let terrible things stop you from doing what you are doing, turn
around and come back to me. Be accountable for your own actions.
What can we say in the face of suffering and loss? That God is with us. That God understands what our suffering is like. That God has promised to
redeem all things, including even our suffering. That suffering and injustice do not have the last word in our

Essay about The World as Will as Theology
The World as Will as Theology
"The Absolute is its appearances; it really is." ... Bradley
"And look at everyone – it's in them all" ["Und sieh dir andre an: es ist in allen"] ... Rilke
It is interesting to view Schopenhauer's teaching of the world as Wille as a theology. In this light Schopenhauer can be considered an 'atheist' only from
a narrow perspective.* Schopenhauer's theology, as a Western monist/monotheist view based onEastern thought, offers an alternative both to atheism
and to Western/Middle Eastern monotheism (Judaism, Christianity, Islam).
[* Other alleged 'atheists' included Socrates, Spinoza, and the early Christians themselves. Often cited as an atheist, Shelley points out on his opening
page that he ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
As Janaway complains, "If the thing in itself is supposed to be unknowable, how can Schopenhauer claim to know what it is?" (Janaway 1999c)
Both Kant and Schopenhauer are quite clear on the noumenon's being not something outside the universe, but to be the appearances, sub specie
aeternitatis. The noumenon is its appearances, not a force 'behind' appearances, pulling the strings.
"[Wille] is that of which all representation, all object, is the phenomenon, the visibility, the objectivity. It is the innermost essence, the kernel, of every
particular thing and also of the whole. It appears in every blindly acting force of nature, and also in the deliberate conduct of man." (Schopenhauer
vol.1, p.110)
"Ultimately, there is only one thing. This brain of mine and my eyeballs are physical components of a material object, my body, which is all, including
them, self–objectification of will. But like everything there is for them to perceive is also self–objectification of will. 'At bottom it is one entity that
perceives itself and is perceived by itself.'" (Magee 1997, p.160f, quoting Schopenhauer vol.2, p.18)
The world is one thing (one energy or force), not many things; and this thing must be uncreated (no cause), unbounded (no space), and eternal (no
time). It follows that human beings are all parts of the noumenon, one

The Concept Of God Understood By Religious Believers Essay
Question: How is the concept of God understood by religious believers?
The concept of God can be a difficult one to appreciate especially in today's world – a world in which anyone that believes in a God is trying to define
exactly what or who God is. To even attempt to understand such a concept, one must first recognise their own beliefs in respect to a number of
questions: Is God our creator?
Is God omnipotent?
Or omniscient?
Or is He both?
These questions apply to all religions and followers who take comfort in faith in what and who they believe? These need to be asked and carefully
answered if one should truly wish to identify their specific beliefs in God's existence. I have considered this idea greatly, and have wondered whether
the idea or concept of God has been diluted over time, through our changing society and through schools/educational establishments becoming more
multicultural or interdenominational. Has society changed so much that we don't have time to fit God into our busy lifestyles or does God have to fit
around us? Is God a faith we are born into or a lifestyle choice, a religious or spiritual journey.
At the heart of philosophy of religion is the concept of God. There are many concepts around the world, and different religions have different views
on the nature of God (Lacewing, 2014). Followers search for answers to life's questions in the comfort of faith in a particular religion. How those
religions provide for their followers

SoulвЂ™s Story: The Use of Conceit in MarvellвЂ™s вЂњOn a Drop...
Poetry is a craft of near–paradox. Poets often say that they aim to encase the abstract within the concrete, describe without adjectives or adverbs, and
expound upon concepts with the utmost concision. To meet these formidable challenges, they keep several important literary devices at their disposal,
one of which is the conceit. Commonly defined as an elaborately extended metaphor, the conceit often allows poets to capture complicated ideas
through comparison with images closer to readers' everyday experiences. If the concept that the poet wishes to illustrate comes from the theological
or philosophical fields, figurative language like the conceit can rescue the poet from didacticism as well as opacity. "On a Drop of Dew," a short... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Even in the second half of the poem, Marvell constructs every description of the soul to correspond with images of the dewdrop, thus rooting his story
in the concrete and avoiding the overuse of abstract, sermon–like diction. In writing that the soul "[d]oes, in its pure and circling thoughts, express/The
greater heaven in an heaven less" (25 – 26), Marvell plays on the word "circling" to recall his earlier description of the way the drop contains a piece
of the sky in its round bead. This clever manipulation of words and images reinforces the concept of the soul's retreat from the body as it attempts to
avoid the corrupting influences of the flesh and to reestablish communion with the heavens. Further observations about the soul in the second half
continually hearken back to parallel observations about the dewdrop. Declaring the soul "[d]ark beneath, but bright above:/Here disdaining, there in
love," Marvell connects the dark urges of the sinful body with the darkness of the flower petal beneath the dewdrop, the glories of heaven with the
brightness of refracted sky–light (31 – 32). By anchoring every description in the concrete, Marvell removes much of the mystery surrounding the
concept of the soul and replaces it with a graceful portrayal of yearning.
Marvell's conceit involves several subordinate metaphors that help him relate

Conception Of God
Shanece Holly
Professor Hostetter
PHIL 103–005
21 October 2014
Traditional Conception of God Who is God and does he actually exist? How do we know that God is the Creator of everything? Can man live
without God? Is God as good as we were always taught to believe that He is? These four questions pulls at the heartstrings of man and must be
answered before someone commits fully to any religion. In this paper, the author will share these four argumentative points proving the existence of God
. This paper is not meant to offend anyone or make someone question one's own religious views, it's only an argument proving the existence of God.
Who is God? Who is God really? God has been described as everything from an impersonal spirit to a personal, ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
First, we must contemplate on the full extent and origin of religious desire and religious experience. From the very beginning of time, man have
been extraordinarily religious. Proof of that extensive belief of religion is man's creation of other deity's such as gods and goddesses, who are in
form of animals and women. Man has an unquenchable thirst to fully understand and to be able to walk in the light of the divine which is why
they create these deity's that they can touch and "communicate with". Man cannot live without God or the idea of God. Saying that man could live
without God is like saying that a watch could produce itself without a watchmaker. God represents eternal life, which leads man to have a desire to
live eternally and persist beyond physical death. Many manmade structures such as the pyramids and towers and also ancient rituals, such as Asian
ancestral worship, express the desire for a life that will never end. Another example is man's questions about life such as, "Why am I really here?",
"What is my purpose in this world?", "What is wrong with the world", and "How can we fix it?" We all seek answers, want to know if wrongs would
be righted, and are naturally good spirited people. Asking questions and seeking the answers is part of our human condition because we were created
in the image of

The Self Is A Sickness Of The Spirit
Kierkegaard writes, "Despair is a sickness of the spirit, of the self, and accordingly can take three form: in despair not to be conscious of having a self
(not despair in the strict sense); in despair not to will to be oneself; in despair to will to be oneself."1 The self manifests itself in two ways: in
despair not to will to be oneself or in despair to will to be oneself. This does not mean that self has reached, in coming to the consciousness of this
despair, the end of the journey. Rather in coming to a consciousness of this despair, only possible beforeGod, the self comes to its greatest struggle:
sin. Sin, for the Christian, is a distortion of the relationship of the self to the God who created it. It is only through encountering God or the
concept of God that the self can understand this "despair" as sin. Therefore, the self encountering God is a matter of the self addressing sin. It is
on this point that Kierkegaard again sheds some light on the relationship of the self and God. Kierkegaard defines sin this way: "Sin is: before God,
or with the conception of God, in despair not to will to be oneself, or in despair to will to be oneself. Thus sin is intensified weakness or intensified
defiance: sin is the intensification of despair."2 Established previously, sin is a distortion of the relationship of the self and God. When sin distorts with
the God–Self relationship the self experiences despair. Despair becomes the intensified weakness of the self to refuse to be

Analysis Of The Book ' Family On Family '
LIBERTY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF DIVINITY
4MAT Book Review– Family to Family
Submitted to Dr Jeff Ward, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the completion of
EVAN 525–B08
Contemporary Evangelism
by
Todd Bush
July 3, 2016
Abstract
The book Family to Family is a solid aide for the family that has lost association with itself. The very motivation behind the book as expressed by the
writers is to "discover God's purpose for your family, develop a family mission statement, establish core values, make time for quality and quantity
family time centered around God's purposes, and equip you to lead your children to Christ and mentor them spiritually."
As the writers Pipes and Lee walk the perusers through these ranges, they demonstrate to us generally accepted methods to raise families that are
focused on Christ and how guardians can render their faith to their kids and alter the course of them leaving the congregation after reaching the age
of eighteen. Family to Family starts with the life of the regular church going family that tries to do an excessive amount of day to day tasks and is not
associated with each other through Christ. The writers give the peruser a week after week and day to day list of activities that this normal family has
and indicates how this is the reason for their detachment with Christ.
Pipes and Lee use information from the American Family Association to demonstrate that "Only 34 percent of America's families eat one meal together

Analysis on Atheism
To be honest with you I think some of McCloskey questions of the existence of God are based and as a Christian I know I have questioned the
existence of God at one point in my life. I had to really learn the hard way. From the article one can see that McCloskey is trying very hard to dismiss
every claim of the theistic view. From the videos on blackboard, when someone decides to prove something or someone, then that means there is
certainty and assurance that thing is absolutely true. The truth of the matter is that we cannot prove one hundred percent of the existence of God and that
is why an Atheist like McCloskey would say that without evidence then there is no God. McCloskey try's his best to scientifically prove that the
creation of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
I believe that every argument is defeasible. I think that the reason that McCloskey is saying this is because he is arguing the God of the bible and not
the minimalistic ideal of God. Everyone is entitled to believe what he or she wants to believe, he saying that the cosmological argument, does not
entitle us to an all–powerful and all–perfect God but that still does not disvalue the rational of there being a God in the first place and I believe that
makes his statement meaningless in disproving the necessity and presence of God.
When it comes to the teleological argument, McCloskey also claims that the teleological argument lacks premises due to similar reasons as the
cosmological argument. In short both arguments do not prove God as a designer. In his mind, this argument is faulty because it does not show enough
evidence for the existence of God. What he means when he argues for a genuine indisputable example of design of the universe is that he desired to see
obvious proof for the existence of God. He disagrees with the fact that it is impossible to proof something with one hundred evidence. In Evans and
Manis, when they talk about some noticeable evidences that prove the existence of God in Philosophy of religion, they said that the way in which
nature and the universe is organized and structured there must be a

Analysis Of Jonathan Edwards 's ' The Hands Of An Angry God '
Jonathan Edwards: A Wrath Within Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God is the sermon that Jonathan Edwards is remembered most for; a sermon in
which one is fearfully reminded of the scorching tortures of hell that awaits the unrepentant sinner. Within his sermon, Edwards preaches that those
sinners plagued by corruption face a malicious judgment; it was the choice made freely by God alone that an imminent wrath had not yet befallen them.
The time for one to repent held no guarantee; if God chose to unleash his hellfire at that very moment, the unrepentant would face an eternity of
anguish. Edwards lashes out against the concept of sin in his sermon, stating, "Sin is the ruin and misery of the soul; it is destructive in its nature; and
if God should leave it without restraint, there would need nothing else to make the soul perfectly miserable." Perhaps Jonathan Edwards' obvious
abhorrence of sin had a connection to a reason beyond the apparent; the words of his sermon being directed much more to himself than to his audience.
The wrath presented within Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God was due to Edwards' fear of his own damnation– he feared having been too late
reborn, but more so he feared sin and its masked hold upon him; an overall inability to conquer the beast of his own humanity. Jonathan Edwards was
a man plagued by dread, and in this agony of fear, he thus inflicted a terror on others for their own salvation; trepidation being communicated through
the words of a

Power Relations Between India And Its Implications
In regards to power relations in India, it is important to be familiar with various theories of power. These concepts are articulated in the scholarly
works of Dumont, Gramsci and Sontheimer. In the text of 'Homo Hierachius: The Caste System and its implications ', Dumont uses the term
encompassment to explain power; where as Gramsci's 'Subaltern Culture ' theory is based on the concept of 'hegemony ' and 'subaltern culture '. On the
other hand, Sontheimer looks at the aspects of 'Hinduism: The five Components and Their Interaction '.
Dumont attempts to explain the formulation of hierarchy system, by the concept of encompassment. An example is given drawing from the biblical
story of creation, which God created Adam as the prototype of mankind. In the second phase God created Eve by extracting a part of Adams Rib
(Dumont 1970 p.240). They became the prototypes of female and male. This has turned Adam from being undifferentiated to become a man. "In this
sense Adam had become two things the one who represent mankind and the prototype of the male individual of his species" (p.240). On one side men
and women are equal, however on the other hand women is the opposite to men. This describes the hierarchy system, in which Eve is encompassed as
being part of Adams body (p.241). This means a hierarchy relation constitutes of a whole and the elements of this whole. The elements belong to the
whole as a set and although they look identical, at the same time they are different.

Analysis Of The Book One Of Mere Christianity By C. S Lewis
From book One of Mere Christianity, C.S Lewis (2001) expressed his ideas on the Right and Wrong as a Clue to the Meaning of the Universe (C.S
Lewis, pg.4). In book Two, he would like to show to the reader the deep meaning of "What Christian Believe" (pg. 33), and the answer to the title of
this book Two isGod. C.S Lewis (2001) shows the meaning in the book Two that God has created this good world for people, but people make it
becoming worse, and the way people live in this world is not how God wants people to live. Jesus came for a reason, God sent Him to save people's
sins, and Christians have to believe that there is only one God in this world (pg. 53) In chapter One of Book Two, C.S Lewis discusses The Rival
Conceptions of God. In this chapter, the author wants the reader to understand that the Christian needs to not believe that other religions are wrong.
Each of the religions may have good things but C.S Lewis wants to emphasize that the rightness religion is Christian, which believes in God only. In
the Holy Bible, there is the story of Moses and Ten Commandments. After saving thousands of people from Egypt led by Moses to the promised
land. God called Moses get all the people to the bottom of the Mount Sinai. God made a great fire, and a smoke on the top of mountain then Moses
have to write down Ten Commandments on the two pieces tablets made of stone (Exodus 19: 20; NIV). The ideas of this story from the Bible parallel
with the ideas that C.S Lewis wants to

Religious Language And Non Cognitive Language
Religious language is essentially the communication about religious ideas, faith and belief. Significantly religious language refers to the terms and
phrases we use when discussing God and his nature; it is an attempt to talk about God using our non cognitive language. Religious language falls into
two categories; cognitive and non–cognitive. Cognitive language expresses facts and knowledge that can be proved to be either true or false. Whereas,
non cognitive language expresses things which are neither true nor false. There is a debate whether religious language is truly meaningful because the
concept of God is something 'other' and 'timeless', yet we only talk of things using our knowledge that is acquired through our sense experience.
Therefore, if something is 'other' and 'timeless', technically is it not part of our experience and thus how can we talk about it?
Firstly, it can be argued that religious language has been proven to be meaningful. The 'Via Negativa', or 'The Negative Way' is a way of talking
about God which focuses on saying what he is not rather than what he is. It is based on the idea that because God is transcendent, we cannot
therefore speak of him. However, we can clearly say what he is not. It's a bit like the game 'Guess Who', as once we know what God is not, we can
work out what he is. The Via Negativa was put forward by Pseudo–Dionysius in a book called 'Mystical Theology'. This is a good way to approach the
subject of God, since our language is

My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy
My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy boasted an amazing maximalist approach that boarded on a hip hop opera symphony with lyrics that were
memorable and verses that can rank as the best hip hop verses of all time. It was an album filled with legendary moments that music fans will
remember for ages, and moments Kanye fan boys will yell at his concerts. This reaction by hip hop fans for My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy
was immediate. For Yeezus, it was different. Yeezus' minimalistic approach threw fans and critics off due to the very left field and experimental
approach he took for this album, both sonically and thematically. In spite of this, Yeezus still manages to hold up it's quality, value, and impact in
comparison to his preceding albums while becoming one of the most important hip hop albums of all time. Leading up to the release of the album,
Kanye premiered the song "New Slaves" on buildings across the globe. New Slaves set the tone for the album's assumed political thematic approach, a
seemingly popular decision. He outright calls out corporations stating "Fuck you and your corporations y'all can't control me", a line he admits may
have caused the lack of promotion for "Black Skinhead", another quasi–politically driven song that was composed to be a radio smash hit. Both of these
songs on their own are fantastic. They're not only well inspired politically driven hip hop songs, they're arena anthems with 'Black Skinhead" bordering
on punk rock. "Middle america packed

Plotinus's Conception Of God
Plotinus's Neoplatonism conception of God originated from Plato's Theory of Forms. Plato proposed that a perfected reality existed in a realm of
Forms. However, Plotinus believed that perfection emanated, not from Forms, but from the One–an abstract concept that he perceived as god. Further,
Plotinus postulated that because the One or god emulated pure perfection, then god rose above all else and was indefinable. To truly experience god, a
spiritual unity of the soul and god must occur. The "vision" born from this union of the soul and god was viewed as the height of spiritual fulfillment.
When researching Plotinus's conception of god, one particular quote from him stood out. In his writings, The Enneads, Plotinus wrote that "this All

Importance Of Faith In Doctor Faustus
Mankind has always struggled with faith, and it always will. The human mind is not easily persuaded to blindly believe, and the concept of God or
gods, since their conception, has always relied upon belief. The importance of faith in relation to one's God was extremely relevant when Christopher
Marlowe composed Doctor Faustus in the 16th century, for the waning influence of the Catholic Church and the general dispersion of religion had
caused a drop in religious fidelity. In his tragedy "Doctor Faustus", Marlowe shows the main character denying opportunities to repent not because of
ignorance, but because of an inability to fully trust in a benevolent divinity, even in a circumstance where man does not question the existence of
heaven or hell. Faustus' inability to trust God stems from his connection with evil, and Marlowe uses Doctor Faustus' thirst for knowledge and power
as the primary reason for his gravitation towards and consequent trust of Satan. In the beginning of the the story, Dr. Faustus seeks to become all
powerful and all knowledgeable, rivaling the omnipotence of God. To achieve such a " world of profit and delight/Of power, of honor and
omnipotence,"(1.52–53) Faustus indulges himself in the realm of dark arts, studying "metaphysics of magicians/And necromantic books" that promise
to enlighten him with extraordinary capabilities. It is the darkness' ability to answer Faustus' desires in the now that gains his trust, for Faustus is not
interested in serving a God that seemingly does nothing for him.This is further illustrated when Faustus proclaims, "To God?–He loves thee not/The
God thou serv'st is thine own appetite"(5.11–12).The instant gratification of evil better resonates with Faustus, and because he never sees God appease
him in the way that darkness has, he trusts Satan more than God. Marlowe has Doctor Faustus matriculate towards Satan in the novel's beginning
because of the perks of evil, and he never turns back. Faustus witnesses a supernatural event that seems to oppose his binding deal with Satan, and
although it does make him question his actions and think about repenting, he ignores the event and continues to abandon his salvation. After deciding
to pledge his soul to

Analysis Of Jenson 's ' The Call Of Abraham And Moses '
By masterfully painting a vivid image of the non–Israelite models of creation, Jenson paints a vivid image of what Israelite creation is precisely not:
Israelite creation rejects both antecedent conditions and the notion of the uninvolved deist God. Once the image of a contra–Israelite creation had been
painted, Jenson begins to wield scripture as the truth–seeking gauge to define what Israelite creation actually is. The rejection of the antecedent
conditions of creation manifest itself for Jenson in the book of Genesis, not science and not history. It is only God's words that bring things into being,
when "God said: Let there be light, and there was light. God saw that the light was good" (New American Bible Genesis 1:3–4). God does not need any
preconditions or help to create the world; God, acting as the sole source of both existence and goodness, simply speaks things into existence absent of
any preconditions. For Jenson, the call of Abraham and Moses by God is a microcosm of the creation of the universe. Once again, through God's actual
speech and words, the patriarch of Israel is called and chosen to set in motion the creation of the great nation of Israel, "The Lord said to Abram: Go
forth from your land, your relatives, and from your father's house to a land that I will show you. I will make of you a great nation, and I will bless
you" (Genesis 12: 1–2). Jenson initially takes the reader through the seemingly confusing and unrelated pedagogical journey into

Women Of The Medieval Times
The lives of the women in the Medieval Times, for the most part ,did not belong to them. Choices such as marriage, intimacy, childbirth and
household responsibilities were thrust upon them by the elder family members and the men that became their husbands. How did these women
survive? Did the hardships inflicted on them day after day on a continuous basis lead to mental illness or a religious awakening? Perhaps the women
of the Medieval Times were more intelligent and capable than one was lead to believe. What lengths would a person go through in order to survive an
unbearable situation? Did the women of the Medieval Times truly go mad or in some cases find God and religion in the lowest point of their lives or
did they, in fact, find their inner strength in order to gain their freedom and pursue their rights to happiness? Emilie Amt, an assistant professor of
history at Washington College demonstrates how women from the Medieval Times lived very complex life. Compared to today, women in the
Medieval Times did not have the freedom to do as they desired. Their decision making choices were not accounted. Marriages, for example, were
arranged. Twelfth–century girl, Christina of Markyate, opposed of her parents' choice of future husband. Despite her parents efforts to persuade her,
whether in a positive manner by providing her with gifts or in a negative manner with threats or involving one of her friends to convince her the arrange
marriage was the correct course of action,

Deuteronomistic Themes In 1 Samuel
Secondly, Saul's home was most likely Gibea or some place close to it. Therefore, some have concluded that the possibility of mixed marriages with
new comers, since Gibeonites, who were from Edomite territories, settled in the land of Benjamin. This is the possible reason why the genealogy of
Saul does not indicate where his father's home is; it was not known or it was deleted.
Summary
In this section historical information concerning the lives of Saul and Samuel have been discussed. Such information will enlighten ones cultural and
contextual study of 1 Samuel 8–15. Moreover, the reader will have more insight into the referential world of the author, thereby allowing one to discern
their intended meaning.
Theological Overveiw
It is conceivable that Deuteronomistic themes exist within 1 Samuel since it is accepted to be part of the Deuteronomistic History. Three main
Deuteronomistic theological themes or concerns are evident within 1 Samuel.
First, foreseeing the day that Israel would have a king, expressed in Deuteronomy are instructions for such a time. At this point it should be noted that
the idea of Israel having a king, began in the mind of God. Contrary to what some believe about the idea of kinship and God's supposed disdain for it,
Howard mentions the fact that "God has spoken of kings to Abraham from the beginning (Gen. 17:6, 16; 35:11)"; furthermore, he noted that the
problem with anointing a king was intention of the people to be like the nations

Examples Of Guilt In Charles Brockden Browns Wieland
Guilt in Charles Brockden Browns' Wieland
There are many ways to decide what makes a man guilty. In an ethical sense, there is more to guilt than just committing the crime. In Charles Brockden
Browns' Wieland, the reader is presented with a moral dilemma: is Theodore Wieland guilty of murdering his wife and children, even though he claims
that the command came from God, or is Carwin guilty because of his history of using persuasive voices, even though his role in the Wieland family's
murder is questionable? To answer these questions, one must consider what determines guilt, such as responsibility, motives, consequences, and the act
itself. No matter which view is taken on what determines a man's guilt, it can be concluded that ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Therefore, Wieland's supposed holy motivation of pleasing the Lord is discounted by his ignorance of the nature of God. Though Wieland's actions
follow a desire to please the Lord, one must question why Wieland did not stop to consider such an illegitimate command.
Though an argument can be made that an action's results, or consequences, not motives, determine a man's guilt, Wieland can still be shown guilty. In
describing how he murdered Catharine, Wieland says, "'Thrice I slackened my grip, and life kept its hold, though in the midst of pangs. Her eye–balls
started from their sockets. Grimness and distortion took place of all that used to bewitch me into transport...'", thus showing that Catharine's brutal
murder one of the consequences of Wieland following the voice's instruction (195). Later, when Clara, Wieland's sister, wants to visit Wieland, her
uncle says, "'...your brother's frenzy is stupendous and frightful. The soul that formerly actuated his frame has disappeared....A fury that is rapacious of
blood that lifts his strength to almost above that of mortals, that bends all his energies to the destruction of whatever was once dear to him, possesses
him wholly." This quote makes clear the unstable state of Wieland, yet another result of his

Summary Of ' Conversation With Daniel Migliore 's ' The...
3.In conversation with Daniel Migliore give an account of what it means to confess that God is triune. Give care to an explication of "economic and
immanent trinity," and perichoresis.
In order to explain what it means to confess that God is triune, Migliore explains the origin of our confession as well as the implications of a God who
is three in one. In the following essay, I will give an account of Migliore's description of how and why we confess the trinity before describing the three
interpretive statements Migliore offers to us in an attempt to explain the triune God in depth.
Migliore defines the Christian confession of God as triune as a "summary description of the witness of Scripture to God's unfathomable love incarnate in
Jesus Christ and experienced and celebrated in the community of faith" (Migliore 67). He is quick to explain that "the doctrine of the Trinity is
not a revealed doctrine...[because it] did not descend miraculously from heaven, nor was it written by God on tablets of stone"'; rather it is "the
product of the meditation and reflection of the church on the gospel message over many centuries" (67). That said, Migliore believes that a
confession of the triune God has both a biblical and experiential basis. He states "if talk of the triune God is not to be wild speculation, it will always
find its basis and its limit both in the biblical narrative of God that comes to the world through Jesus Christ in the power of the Holy Spirit and in the
actual

Comparing The Interior Castle And Institutes Of The...
The command to "know thyself" echoes from the Delphic oracle through modern popular culture; however, despite the persistence of the dictum across
centuries, the notions of knowledge and self have undergone significant changes. The 16th century offers a liminal period of such changes in the
Western world as the Reformations, both Catholic and Protestant, remade the Christian self. In this essay, I offer a foray into the concept of
self–knowledge in this pivotal period by comparing the concept in Teresa of Avila's The Interior Castle and John Calvin's Institutes of the Christian
Religion. These two dissimilar figures, one a Catholic, mystical theologian and the other the father of Reformed Protestantism renowned for his
systematic rigor, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Interior Castle represents Teresa of Avila's mature reflections on the nature of humanity's growth in relationship toGod. In this work, written by
Teresa in 1577 at the age of 62, we are offered the sagacious reflections of a woman who has spent over forty years in reflection on and practice of
the contemplative life. Teresa structures the work around the image of the soul as a castle with seven dwelling places through which one moves as
they grow deeper in the path to spiritual union with God. Teresa attributes this image to a vision or communication from God and describes the soul
as "made entirely out of a diamond or of very clear crystal, in which there are many rooms" wherein "the King, God, dwells in the innermost place."
This image of the castle is essential for understanding Teresa's conception of self–knowledge. The entire process from start to finish is an exercise in
interiority culminating in a unitive experience with God. One's first steps into the castle is an exercise in knowing one's self. Teresa even calls this
first room of the castle the room of self–knowledge. For Teresa says, "Knowing ourselves is something so important that I wouldn't want any
relaxation ever in this regard, however high you may have climbed into the heavens." For Teresa, self–knowledge exists within a reciprocal relationship
to the knowledge of God. As one grows to know his/herself, one gains a

Why is The Name El Shaddai so Important? Essay examples
Why is the name El Shaddai so important; what wisdom can a name contain? The Israelites of Old Testament times firmly believed in God's
revelation to them, Deuteronomy 29:29 (NIV) says, "The secret things belong to the Lord our God, but the things revealed belong to us and to our
children forever, that we may follow all the words of this law". Steadfastly, the Israelites waited for what God revelation, so that they could live rightly
in His eyes and learn more about His character. Andrew Jukes writes, "We cannot yet see the things of heaven. God therefore reveals them as we can
bear it, with the accuracy of One who sees them as they are, and in a way in which they may be seen and understood by us" (7). God chose the form
of names as ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
If He cannot, than does that truly make Him almighty? Jukes declares, that a new definition must be formed; he writes, "Almightiness... is not the
power of doing anything or everything. Almightiness is the power to carry out the will of a Divine nature" (63).
With this definition in mind, the two words, "El", and "Shaddai", must be analyzed for what they reveal about God's nature. According to Nathan
Stone, "the word 'el' itself is translated 'God' over 200 times in the Bible" (32). Yet it holds more significance then just being a general term for "God".
Mary Loeks writes, "El is a shortened form of Elohim. It sets forth the might, the strength, and the excellence of God" (107). Examples of "El" being
associated with "strength" are numerous in the Old Testament. For instance, Psalm 68:35b says, "the God [El] of Israel gives power and strength to
his people". The instances of "El" in the Old Testament are not even exclusively tied with the term "God", but even directly tied with a general idea
of "strength". Such as when Laban speaks to Jacob in Genesis 31:29 and states, "I have the power (el) to harm you". Thus, the term "El" is continually
paired with the idea of "power" or "strength", revealing that God associates Himself with Stone then questions the second part of El Shaddai, if "El"
means strength, "How, then, shall we understand that

The Absence Of God Within Lucky 's Speech
The Absence of God within Lucky's Speech
Lucky's monologue is the most confusing and, of course, the deepest part of the play. Towards the middle of part one in Samuel Beckett's "Waiting
for Godot", the character called Lucky gives a "speech" to the audience. Of course, the first time viewing this, nobody understood the message given.
How could you? It's just a bunch of gibberish and nonsense. Except, Lucky's speech isn't just formless nonsense, it is simply dissolution of form. Lucky
delivers the audience a commentary on religion, the academy, and mankind itself. The main theme however, was the absence ofgod. In the first few
words of Lucky's speech, he says "Given the existence... of a personal God... with white beard... outside time ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
However, it can also be translated to a God who is outside of time, meaning He is no longer connected with us. The fact that He wouldn't be reaching in
all directions, but it is humans that are attempting to reach out to him with no success.
Lucky later goes on about ".. Divine apathia divine athambia divine aphasia.." Apathia is latin for "freedom from suffering", athambia can be best
defined as imperturbability which according to Merriam–Webster's Dictionary means, very calm; very hard to disturb or upset. Aphasia, interestingly
enough, is a language disorder which affects a person's ability to communicate. This last phrase is somewhat foreshadowing to our second encounter
with Lucky when he has become a mute. However, these words not only foreshadow coming events, but they also are a reference to humanity's
relationship with God. First, when God created us, we had freedom from suffering, apathia. Then, there was a sort of calmness when God was first out
of the picture, athambia. Finally, when humanity attempted to reach out to God, there was no answer, aphasia. God had abandoned humanity.
In God's absence, humanity had began its decline. It all began as "a result of the labors left unfinished," When humanity realized that God was no
longer with them, struggled to find their purpose in life. As lucky had put it,

Essay Camparing Christian Mysticism and Buddhism
What can be said about the unspeakable? How does one begin to describe the indescribable? The very act of discussing ineffability questions whether
anything can be truly ineffable in the first place. Religion almost always critically depends on the ineffability of some experience or entity. This is a
widespread tendency, but some would argue that it is a rule for all religions. That there must be the recognition of something
"beyond," "transcendent" or "pure."
Prior to judging Christian or Buddhist beliefs, it is necessary to understand ineffability itself. Generally speaking, it is unspeakable. Conceptually, it is
not attainable.
By our standards, it is beyond our human realm.
To speak is to make distinctions. As... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In order to grasp the ultimate truth, it is necessary to escape the linguistic and conceptual limitations that are part of humanity. To see beyond our filters
and ourselves is the only way to experience something purely.
2. Christian Mysticism
In the Christian religions, there is a God. Worshiped and loved, this divinity is three persons in one: the Father, the Son (Jesus), and the Holy Ghost.
Among the multitude of denominations, and through the ages there have been many types of
Christian mystics. The foundation of all religions is arguably set by mysticism, which is as Evelyn Underhill put it, "the direct intuition or experience
of God" (Fanning, 2). Those who are identified as mystics in the Christian traditions claim to have had a very intimate, direct connection to God.
This divine communion with God is claimed by mystics to be beyond words. It is not something that can be described to anyone who has not
experienced it. That which we have heard it called, includes: "divine possession", "mystical marriage with the deity", and "mystical ecstasy" (Fanning,
7–13). They feel to have become one with God, and that they are God. They say that their way is the only way to properly worship God.
Simply knowing of him is not enough; one must truly come to know him through mystical experiences.
In order to achieve such a feeling, devotes must go through some personal growth first. To

Descartes Argument for the Existence of God Essay
Descartes employs what is known as an ontological argument to prove the existence of God. Saint Anselm who lived during the 11th century first
formulated this type of argument. Since then it has proved popular with many philosophers including Rene` Descartes. Even though ontological
arguments have lost popularity with modern philosophers there has been some recent attempts to revive them. Descartes formulation is regarded as
being one of the best because it is straight forward and relatively easy to follow. It is also useful when trying to understand Descartes to keep in mind
that he talks about two types of existence. There is the normal everyday existence we experience and a special type of existence which he calls,
necessary ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Descartes argues that we can no more imagine God not existing then we can imagine a mountain without a valley.
In this analogy Descartes is trying to draw out the distinction between ordinary existence and necessary existence. The idea of a mountain implies a
valley. It may be possible to argue that one can imagine a mountain without a valley but such structures do not exist in real life. In the real world
mountains and valleys are found together. So mountains imply existence of valleys but unlike the imperfect existence we find in the mountainous
world, God's existence is both perfect and necessary. For Descartes, necessary existence as opposed to ordinary existence is the key.
Descartes is pointing out the difference between the existence of God and the existence of a mountain. Finite things, says Descartes, have possible or
contingent existence. For example, a finite thing such as a mountain relies on volcanic forces and weathering to bring it in and out of existence.
Necessary existence on the other hand is contained in the idea of God. Therefore, God does not need anything to bring him in and out of existence.
Descartes goes on to say that if God's existence was not necessary then he would have to rely on something else to being him in and out of existence.
This would mean that God would be neither external to the physical world nor perfect. This is of course is

My Almost Four Years at St. Joseph's College
Throughout my almost four years at Saint Joseph's College, I have gained heaps of knowledge about various topics, anywhere from my Sports
Management classes to Business to Physical Education. But little did I know, when I signed up to be a Puma, I signed up for something beyond a
great education. My beliefs, values, and ethics have been put to the test. Not only going through the huge life changing event of going to college, but I
have been asked time and time again what I thought and what I believed. This semester in Core 9, I have learned more about myself than I thought
there was to me. My beliefs have blossomed into a never ending love for God and a desire to become closer to God every single day. My values have
been tested to the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Malone stated that "God wants us to use our suffering to make the world and ourselves better." This speaks to me because I don't think that God
can force your choice especially with the free will. God also gave us something that he didn't have to give us. He gave us the power to make our
own decisions, free will. Everyday we make decisions, big or small. The small decisions like what to wear and what to eat are not as important in
our development as a person as who we surround ourselves with, our friends. At one point in my life, I surrounded myself with the wrong group of
people. As a consequence of being around people with questionable values, my image suffered greatly. People make decisions sometimes that they
are going to hurt someone. These are life altering decisions. These decisions can really hurt your relationship with God and with other people that
you surround yourself with. Sach's, he brings up another great point by saying, "We are really free to be, free to ourselves, different from God.
The real freedom of the world is what God most intensely desires and is its greatest good. For, only in freedom can there be a real relationship of
love in which each of the lovers takes delight in the mystery of the other." (Sachs 27). Later in that same section, he says, "On its deepest level, it is
the capacity and responsibility to be in loving relationship with

The History Of Rasselas, Prince Of Abyssinia By Samuel...
A worldview is a mental model of reality. It is the idea and attitudes towards the world, life, and us as individuals. Each individual has their own
unique worldview. People acquire a worldview by how they go through life, it may change or even stay the same. How they grew up, life
situations, values, religion, and attitudes are factors that may affect one's worldview. There are many questions that can make up one's
worldview. How should we act? What gives life purpose? Where did we come from? These are some of many questions that can help define
someone's worldview. The book The History of Rasselas, Prince of Abyssinia by Samuel Johnson, brings up many worldviews. The characters in
the book go on a journey to figure out their worldview. Which I think this is the best way to build someone's worldview. Rasselas is a prince who
has lived his whole life in solitude. Everything is perfect for him, he does not have to worry about anything. Everyone who lives there is happy
and it is kind of like that perfect utopia. Rasselas struggled to find the purpose of life. Being in the valley he did not have much experience of the
outside world. Rasselas lacks variety as well as someone to sympathize with him. He began to desire the world around him and wants to go out and
explore. Rassales had a friend whose name was Imlac. Imlac was a poet who was very wise. Although Imlac had wisdom he did not really apply
himself to his full potential with all of his knowledge. Rassales explains

Tennyson's In Memoriam Essay
Tennyson's In Memoriam
In Memoriam is an elegy to Tennyson's friend Arthur Hallam, but bears the hallmark of its mid nineteenth century context, 'the locus classicus of the
science–and–religion debate.'Upon reflection, Hallam's tragic death has proved to be an event that provoked Tennyson's embarkation upon a much more
ambitious poetic project than conventional Miltonian elegy, involving meditation upon the profoundest questions faced by mankind. Scientific
advancements, most notably in the fields of geology and biology, challenged the beliefs that form the foundation of Christianity: the belief in a
beneficent God responsible for creation and ensuing superintendence and the belief in man's immortal soul. By the mid ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
They are Tennyson?s trip through Hades. By personifying Nature and placing ?her? in opposition to God as a distinct power, Tennyson seems to
imply a polytheistic belief that two, not one, seats of power exist. In these passages it seems that Tennyson perceives Nature to have greater
influence over Earth and mankind. At the close of LV, God appears as distant and hidden in darkness, leaving man in a state analogous with that of a
child ? weak, vulnerable and desirous of care: he falls ?upon the great world?s altar stairs That slope thro? darkness up to God,? (lines 14–15).
Metaphorically darkness represents the secrecy surrounding God and the answers that he holds, a motif that is reprised at the close of LVI: ?behind
the veil, behind the veil.? The repetition of the clause emphasises Tennyson?s frustrations. Indeed God seems so distant and hidden that Tennyson?s
faith in his existence is weakened and he is only able to ?feel? and ?faintly trust,? not resolutely know. The lack of conviction conveyed here through
Tennyson?s semantic choices illustrates an emergence of disillusion with eutheistic belief. The existence of the Christian conception of a loving god is
called into question, and it is implicitly asserted that the conception of Nature conveyed in these passages may be the true, ditheistic, conception of
God. That ?of fifty seeds she often brings but one to bear? (LV line 7–8) envisages a large picture of organic existence, despairing of

The Meditations On First Philosophy
The Meditations on First Philosophy gives us with an assumed evidence for the existence of God those progresses from the existence of an idea of an
unlimited existence in the human mind–an idea of God–to the being of God himself. Insofar as we have an idea of an unlimited existence, an idea with
"infinite independent reality", we can reasonably ask when it arrived to us. The only thinkable reason of this impression, prerogatives Descartes, is an
countless existence, explicitly, God. The manifestation of correct this knowledge in the proof is crucial. In element, Descartes continues that any such
fundamental proof for God's existence fatefully trusts on this idea.it performs to myself that all these proofs originated on his exceptional belongings
are reducible to a single one; and also that they are incomplete if we do not add to them the impression which we must of God
There is a inclination to apprehend Descartes as in consequence pretentious the meditator (the narrator of the Meditations) is allowed at the outset of
the proof to the foundation that he has the obligatory idea. As Bernard Williams says in his seminal study, Descartes proves God's existence from the.
Idea of God, the existence of which in his perspective needs no proof Alternatively, Descartes (and the meditator) is occasionally said to trust on the
get of self–examination and the translucence of believed: to intelligence, the necessary idea of God is there, only waiting to be noticed. Either way,
booklovers

Salvation Essay
Salvation
In Langston Hughes' essay "Salvation," Langston talks about the first time he is going to be saved from sin. Langston is a young boy around the age
of thirteen. He is going to church to see Jesus for the first time. In which case, he truly experiences religion for the first time in his life. Throughout this
essay Langston uses many narrative techniques such as, imagery, metaphors, and irony to explain his interpretation of that one night when he did not
see Jesus. It was the night of the big revival, and Langston, a young boy going on the age of thirteen, was brought to his Aunt Reed's church to see Jesus
and be saved from sin. His aunt told him, "when you were saved from sin you saw a light, and something ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The story takes place the night after a big revival, in a hot and crowded church. Langston's aunt Reed escorts him "to the front row and placed him on
the mourners' bench with all the other young sinners, who had not yet been brought to Jesus" (218). He sat there patiently waiting for Jesus to come
to him. In the meantime, people filled the room with much noise and loud shouts of joy, and happiness. Much of the figurative language Langston
uses in his essay "Salvation" can stimulate the senses of a person. For example, Langston describes the church as hot and crowded. When I was a
child I remember entering church and seeing all the people fill up the pews. Everyone packed himself or herself in to get a seat instead of having to
stand in the back. This made me feel hot and claustrophobic. Also, Langston's wide use of metaphor and simile helps the reader visualize what he can
actually see. For example, when he depicts the men and women who are sitting in the church. He says, "A great many old people came and knelt
around us and prayed, old women with jet–black faces and braided hair, old men with work–gnarled hands" (219). This quote is an excellent example
of metaphor. The "old men with work–gnarled hands" really helps the reader picture the type of people sitting around him. The description of the old
men's hands is so vivid and lively. It makes you think what type of rough work these men have to do in their everyday lives.

The Problem of Non-Belief
The Problem of Non–Belief
Drange vs. McHugh– Scoring the Debate
Drange's Argument from Non–Belief
The argument being put forth by Drange specifically attacks the God of Evangelical biblical Christianity, an important distinction for the argument
itself. The Encyclopedia Britannica illuminates evangelicalism as a Christian protestant movement which emphasizes conversion and the foundational
nature of the Bible as the only basis for faith, declaring the Bible as "inerrant." (Brittanica, par.1)
According to Drange's argument, presuming that if God exists, there are numerous ways through which he could have brought change in some
circumstances to ensure belief in his existence (Drange 418). For instance, one way would have ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
ANB's supposition [A2] stands that if God existed then he would bring about Situation S, but significantly only providing that scenario S is among
the Lord's desires. However, that distinction allows for the possibility of other desires to succeed [A2], which makes a need for premise [A3].
However, there is also an issue of whether God might want Situation S without seeking to carry it about himself. For example, if God wants Situation
S to occur, but wants human beings to come by their belif in a genuine, authentic and human way, then the theory is valid. However, the weakness in
Drange's argument, as he illuminates, is the lack of direct biblical evidence to support the refutation of [A3]. Drange himself maintains, "there are no
Biblical verses that support it (the premise) directly" and will have to rely on indirect Biblical support to continue (420).
First, Drange posits an argument for [A3] by highlighting the use of the word 'conflict' in the premise, illuminating that nothing is impossible for God
so the idea of conflicting desires for the supreme being is extraneous, and therefore [A3] is automatically made valid. Drange goes on to debunk this
argument in its logical shortcomings before reverting back to indirect biblical evidence for support of [A3]. Argument 7 utilizes the support of the
forceful nature of Biblical scripture which substantiate [A2] (Drange 420). It is suggested in many instances throughout the Bible of God's want for
Situation

William Blake Loss Of Innocence Essay
Critics of William Blake's Songs of Innocence and Experience not surprisingly have focused their attention on the galaxy of characters whose voices
are heard throughout Blake's poems. Along with the cacophony of voices of London's disenfranchised–the men, women and children, the chimney
sweeper or the harlot who thronged London's streets and whose piteous cries became the object of Blake's concern, the two set of artistic manifestation
portray a seamless blending between innocence, a gradual loss of innocence and finally a metamorphosis into a higher state of innocence. In addition to
the spoken voices there runs throughout the Songs an undercurrent of silent voices–voices that can be inferred, or as Blake would say, imagined–which
speaks no... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Even the poem in its "innocent" counterpart is one of mellifluous rhythm which nonetheless casts up enormous questions about what Blake means by
"innocence" His Little Black Boy serves to teach humanity an education of compassion or pity, evident in the way he strokes his "silver hair" as if
realising that whiteness cannot withstand the scorching force of God's heat. His immortal words in Fly

Hamlet's Change in Philosophy
Hamlet is an intensely cerebral character marked by a desire to think things through and pick situations apart. As such, for the first three and a half
scenes of Hamlet, Hamlet broods over his father's death instead of taking action against Claudius, his father's murderer. Hamlet finally acts because he
experiences three intense emotional jolts that allow him to view his situation from a new perspective and spur him to action. Together, these emotional
experiences alter his personal philosophy about the nature of death and God's relationship with creation, and compel him to finally take decisive action.
Hamlet arguably takes his first bold action when he stabs Polonius through the arras. However, this is not the beginning of ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
6–11)
Hamlet's rash action serves him well, as he avoids imminent death upon arrival in England. This quote represents a complete reversal of Hamlet's
philosophy regarding action and the nature of God.
In Act I, scene 2, Hamlet makes his concept of God quite clear: he feels God has let creation to go to seed, and removed Himself from active
involvement in the world. NEED QUOTE HERE – weed the garden? This philosophy laid the groundwork for Hamlet's inaction. If God is not willing
or available to help shape circumstances on earth for the better, all human action must be considered and weighed so as to achieve the best outcome.
If God is involved in the world, we can leave some of that consideration up to Providence, and be assured that He will shape our "rough–hewn ends" for
the better. This posture obviously encourages swift, ill–considered action. Hamlet comes to this revelation through his intense fear of death.
Hamlet's final revelation comes when he returns to Elsinore. As he and Horatio walk through the woods, they come across a gravedigger preparing a
new grave. Hamlet discovers that one of the skulls the gravedigger plucked out of the ground is that of the old court jester, Yorick. As he gazes

General, And God 's Responsibility For His Pain Essay
In this chapter, we are going to follow Job from his silent brokenness through the increasingly volatile exchanges with his friends/counselors/would–be
comforters as he dared to say things about God that shocked them and perhaps make us pause as well. Although the friends will get their full–fledged
turn in our next chapter, here we will begin to hear them "speak" because their claims were part of the backdrop for Job's outraged responses. As we
will see, he dismissed them quite soon and focused on other issues related to his suffering, not least how to understand the prospect of his own sin,
wickedness in general, and God's responsibility for his pain. We will cycle back in a subsequent chapter to unpack at greater length what Job said about
the God who had become his Adversary.
Job's Initial Outburst
As the prologue drew to a close, Job acknowledged that all he had was from the hand of God, and that
God could both remove all of the bounty and bring calamity (1:21; 2:10). He did not lose sight of the fearsome side of God's sovereignty. In his
extreme circumstances, he was learning to hold the things of his life with a gentle grip. His wife, on the other hand, demonstrated the all–too–common
attitude that
Satan had anticipated Job would manifest. For her part, when ill came, there was nothing else to do but curse God and die (2:9). Job would not give
in so quickly.
Instead, he cursed the day he was born! At the precipice between life and death, his torment was excessive and

The Puritan Conception Of God
The Puritan conception of the Devil rested on the belief that the Devil did not exist in spite of God, but because of God. The Puritan's conception of
God, covenants, and human imperfection are all factors directly tied to the Puritan's understanding of the Devil. These aspects of Puritan theology and
their connection to the Devil can be traced through Cotton Mather's "Wonders of the Invisible World."
The notion that everything happened for a reason only known to God was a central theme of Puritan life. In the eyes of the Puritans, God was perceived
as the supernatural force that controlled the universe. Although the Puritan's trusted in God's Providence to guide them through the life preordained for
them, there was a constant struggle

The Bible, A Controversial Topic Which Diverses From A
The bible, a controversial topic which diverses from a numerous amount of opinions. From a young age, I was raised as a catholic and I never question
it, even though it seems incomprehensible scientifically speaking. Then I learned, that that 's when faith comes in. Probably the most important factor
is faith, commonly defined as complete trust in someone or something, but has develop a religious definition, strong belief in God or in the doctrines of
a religion, based on spiritual apprehension rather than proof. People who believe in a God and people who are athiest have one thing in common,
faith. Although, it play a different role, people who believe in a God have faith which changes based on their past and present experiences. For ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He starts of by addressing his beliefs on religion. He had religious parents, but once he had his own family, religion was never practice in their
household. One day he received a call from his wife stating they had been in a in car accident which ended with the car in pieces but not a single
scratch to his wife and daughter. For example, Cronin asserts, "It's a miracle, I saw the whole thing, nobody should have survived"(65). This quote
illustrates an idea of how bad the car cash must of been. So this becomes the turning point, because can be the scientific reason for them to come
out unharmed. His daughter did not believe in God. He elaborates on the idea that his daughter is an atheist because out of arrogance and laziness,
freethinking parents allow children to decide these things for themselves. Cronin feels guilty of his daughter 's decision because he believes he has
failed to inform her about the concept of God. As in comparison to the bible the author describes the complex idea of God and the different
perspectives people developed throughout the years. It talks about how the human curiosity rebels against God from early stages of human creation.
For example the most common human disobedience by Adam and Eve and the forbidden fruit. In addition the tower of Babel is an excellent example
because it shows how what the concept of faith is. According to the story it was a time where one language was spoken and

Faith And Authentic Faith

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Katie Fernandez

More from Katie Fernandez (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Faith And Authentic Faith