Why Did William Win The Battle Of Hasting

Why Did William Win The Battle Of Hasting
Why did William win the Battle of Hasting?
The Battle of Hastings took place on October 14th 1066.It was between Harold Godwinson and William the Duke of Normandy. Edward the
confessor (King or England) died of old age.Before he died he promised 3 mens to claim the throne of England.These mens were Horold
Godwindon,Willam of Normandy and Harald Hadrada.Each of these mens thought they were the best to claim the throne of England but in oder to find
out There was Battles (stamford bridge) .After the battle of Stamford Bridge, Harold Godwinson heard some bad news. This was that William had
invaded.At the end William of Normandy was sucessful but why?
Willams strength
Willam won the Battle of Hasting because he has many strength such as his army had cavalry(War Horse) which gave them lots of power. His Army
spent many days sleeping eating and resting before
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Why Didnt the Vikings Get Credit for Discovering America
Who discovered America? When most people think about this, the first thing that comes to mind is Christopher Columbus. When Columbus returned
from the Antilles in 1493, he was not the first European to have stepped foot on the New World. What if I were to say that the Vikings were the ones
who actually discovered America? However, they didn't get credit for it because of the bad things that they have did.
Leif Eriksson set out from Greenland towards the west and first reached Baffin Island which he named Helluland or Land of Stone. From there he
sailed south to Labrador and into the Gulf of St. Lawrence region which he named Vinland or Land of Wine for the wild grapes that were found there.
He created a town at L'Anse aux Meadows, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In 865, the Great Heathen Army attacked East Anglia (England). After that invasion failed, they attacked England once again in 1066, but were
defeated at the battle of Stamford Bridge. The Vikings attack England again during the Reign of Canute the Great Again in 1066, the Normans invaded
and conquered England. The Vikings could not defeat Paris but the King was so impressed that he gave me land.
I believe that the Vikings were in fact the first to discover America. The key word is "Discover" for the native Americans did not discover America,
they just lived there. Also the Vikings were not very creative and named things very obviously, so why would they call the new land Newfound
Land, if it was inhabited by people, it wouldn't be new. The only reason that they don't get credit for it is because of the things they did like attacking
England. They were disliked by just about all countries, so why give them credit for discovering America?
If you were in England's shoes, wouldn't you try to erase them from history. Why not give some one else fromEurope the credit for discovering
America. Being that both England and Scandinavia are both in Europe, why make Europe look bad? Why not just let someone who is from Europe
and who is sent from the king and queen of Spain get the credit. This way making people forget about the Vikings, and still showing how great and
how high of a place Europe is.
Shirah Vargas

How Did The Battle Of Normandy Affect The World
The Battle of Normandy had a great political effect on the world. If the Germans had won that would mean Hitler would have gained an enormous
amount of power. In addition, that would have given the Russians and enormous amount of power as well. Democracy as we know it today would not
exist. We would be under a communist government; which means no freedom of speech for one. With the help of our allies, we were able to invade
Normandy on 6th June 1944 and the battle lasted until August 1944. It was extremely difficult to get the Britain's to buy into the invasion. They were
very hesitant because of the causalities they suffered in World War I. Once we were able to get them to buy in it was game on and that gave us a
tremendous boost. The sacrifices that these brave men gave are very apparent in today's world. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Allied Forces included The United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Free France, Poland, Australia, Free Belgium Forces, New Zealand,
Netherlands, Norway, Free Czechoslovak Forces, and Greece. Each of the nation's brought different aspects to battle against the German Nazi's.
Approximately 156,000 American, British, and Canadian forces landed on five beaches along a 50–mile stretch. The Battle "began with overnight
airborne paratrooper and glider landings, massive air attacks, and naval bombardments, and an early morning amphibious assault on 6 June, D–Day" as
stated by the Stamford Social Society (The Stamford Historical). The shores of Normandy France were heavily guarded and fortified by German
soldiers. According to the History channel website the "the invasion was one of the largest amphibious military assaults in history and required
extensive planning." It also goes on to say "the Normandy landings have been called the beginning of the end of war in Europe" (Staff, 2009). More
than 4,000 allied forces lost their lives on the beaches Normandy on

Who Won The Battle Of Hastings
Duke William of Normandy won the battle because he was well prepared, had enough to time to organize, rest, had good weapons and had a well
trained army including archers, infantry and Calvary. In total, William had approximately 7500 men ready to battle whereas King Harold
unfortunately had only 4500 voluntary village people who volunteered to battle and only five hundred professionally trained soldiers. They prepared
carefully for the battle. The Normans had knights on horseback (Calvary) who were skilful fighters. William also was skilful and ambitious, and he
was determined to be King of England. In the Bayeux Tapestry, it shows William's army preparing for battle, embarking huge ships filled with wood
and supplies such as wine, weapons, and horses. There are also pictures of the knights in full battle armour riding out to war. William's men also had
better armour and weapons, for example: the cavalry were all equipped with mail hauberk, there is some evidence that archers used crossbows in
addition to bows and arrows, some battle maces were also used along with spears and swords, round shields and kite shaped shields. This meant that
the Normans were more protected from the English, than the English were ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Battle of Hastings was fought in the autumn time, and many of Harold's English army were made of farmers (the Fyrd) a number of them had
to return home to harvest their crops, or else when the English came back, they would all be famished and on top of that, most of his best soldiers
had died in the Battle of Stamford Bridge therefore Harold has less soldiers. Also, once hearing the news that the wind changed directions when they
just won the Battle of Stamford Bridge, Harold's army (even though they were badly injured) had to race back to the south coast of England marching
250 miles just to battle William thus resulting in Harold's soldiers feeling exhausted, tired and

Essay On The Norman Invasion Of England
Introduction
The Norman invasion of England in 1066 stands out in British history as the last time the isle was successfully invaded (Kramer.34). The invasion
followed as a result of the death of the English king, Edward the Confessor, as he died childless on January the 4. 1066 (Barlett). The throne was left
vacant and consequently three most mighty men disputed the line of succession: Harland Goodwinson, the head of one of the most notable and
powerful noble families in the whole of England, Harald Hardrada, king of Norway, and William, Duke of Normandy (Wold.5).
The conflict was in the end resolved at the battle of Hastings in 1066. As Harald Goodwinson's army first faced Harald Hardrada's Viking attack in
September of 1066 in the battle of Stamford Bridge. Harald Goodwinson's army managed to defeat the Vikings in an exhausting battle, however, only
three days later William's army reached Hastings and Goodwinson and his army had to rush to the sight to face their new foe. Goodwinson's army
was indeed reduced and tired after the trials at Stamford Bridge, nevertheless, what followed was the longest battle in the history of medieval Britain
(Kramer.33), and the result was a new king of England, the Duke of Normandy, King William the Conqueror.... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Did this last invasion hold any lasting and important changes for the future direction of the country, and if the answer is yes, what may those changes
be?
In this essay, I will look at three important factors of the aftermath of the Norman invasion. First, I will consider how William the Conqueror ruled his
England and how this affected the way of life for the English. Secondly, I will look at how the Norman England evolved and formed. Lastly, I will talk
about the Magna Carta, how and why it came into existence, and how it affected the society and what was to

Dury Family History
Drury is English. This family descended from John De Drury, the son of a Norman French nobleman, who fought his way to power in England
along with William the conqueror in 1066. The Drury's held large estates in Suffolk, England for centuries. Their coat of arms from the 1200's has a
Tau cross between two gold stars on a green band across the top of a silver shield. The family in later years moved over to the United States to get a
better life and like people would say "restart" in the new life of America. Drury descendants lived in Massachusetts as early as 1651. I researched
our history only as far back as my great grandfather who is James Amos Drury, born in the year of 1827 or near that time. There are pieces from the
family history that are missing or we could just not figure out but I tried my best to find all the information I could. James died December 9, 1862 and
is buried at National Cemetery, Plot 4 – 1862, Grave #6100, Section B, Nashville, Tennessee. He enlisted January, 1862 in the Civil War from his
home state of Indiana where he resided with his family near Pendleton. He was stricken with chronic diarrhea and died at Hospital number 12 at
Nashville, Tennessee. On July 27, 1848 he was united in marriage to... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
On December 1, 1866 John Simms appeared at the Clerk of the Circuit Court, Princeton, Missouri, Mercer County to be sworn according to law as
guardian of the minor children of James A. Drury, deceased. Grandma Drury Simms and husband John Simms moved from Indiana to Princeton,
Missouri sometime between January 5, 1865 and December 1, 1866. The daughter Mary Lou Drury did not move to Missouri with her mother and
stepfather but chose to marry and remain in Indiana. The Simms family later in the years consisted of 4 children listed as follows: Lydia Ellen Simms,
Lucy Camille Simms Zimmerman, Sarah Bell Sims Flory, and Albert L.

Canute Legacy
Denmark (as Canute II; 1018–35) and Norway (1028–29) referred to as North Sea Empire. Canute is consider one of the most influential English
Kings. Canute was born around 995 AD and died on (November 12, 1035), nor the place or birthdate is unknown. After the North Conquest, Canute
legacy received serious setback and was lost to history. Canute was the son of Svein Forkbeard Canute's grandfather was Harald Bluetooth and his
great–grandfather was King Gorm, the identity of his mother is uncertain only that she was a slavic princess and the daughter of Mieszko I of Poland.
Canute was left in charge of a fleet in Gainsborough, Lincolnshire. That was then he meet Aelfgifu, daughter of an ealdorman of Northumbria. Sweyn I
Forkbeard (Canute's father)... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The beginning of the Norman Conquest took place seven miles from Hastings, England on Senlac Hill. Childless King Edward the Confessor, the last
king of the Anglo–Saxon royal line, was killed on January 1066, which set a struggle between several claimants to his throne.William his successor
in 1051 was involved in a marriage with a lack of an heir promising the throne to different parties throughout his reign as king, including Harold
Godwinson Harold was crowned (Jan 5, 1066) shortly after Edward's death, Tostig and the Northern King Hardrada (Harold III of Norway) joined
forces invading the north before exposing it to William. Harold hastened to Yorkshire, where at the Stamford Bridge (September 25) he won the
Battle of Stamford Bridge. The deaths of Tostig and Hardrada at Stamford left William as Harold's only opponent. William assembled a force from
the Norman aristocracy and the papacy. With detained forces for eight weeks with knights and foot soldiers of 4,000–7,000. Harold being occupied in
the north, William crossed the channel landing in Pevensey, moving directly to Hastings. 7,000 men hurrying southward to Hastings. Being surprised
by William in the process, Harold drew his army toward the ridge of 10 miles northwest. With William's rumored mounted assault, with the failing of
breaching the English lines and panicked by the rumor of william's death finding out later on that William was alive and killed many English soldiers.
Harold was killed by an arrow, any remaining English soldiers fled. William being crowned in Westminster Abbey on christmas day, 1066 after
sweeping advance to isolate London and English leaders submitting to him. William's victory destroyed England's links, the introduction of land tenure
and military service radically changed

Vikings Impact On Society
The past is like a foreign country, they do things differently there. The Vikings had quite a large impact to today's society, as mentioned further on,
but their past is where the Viking legacy began. Today we will take you back to a dark but thriving era. To them the terror that they caused was just a
part of life but today we would consider their ways – 1 step – too far. Around 400 years of Viking life is about to be exposed. We are going to lookpast
the movies and books and find out who were the Vikings and how they were connected to the past?
Contrary to some popular rumors of the Vikings, they were not a "race" linked by ties of common ancestry, and could not be defined by how the
outsiders referred to them. Most of the Vikings come ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The east Midlands dialect, in particular, was later to emerge as a major contributor in the growth of modern English. While the common discussion is
that the impact of the Vikings during the Viking Age, was not as enduring based on the Vikings skilled approach to assimilating into the local
population. The Viking culture has had a lasting impact on the art, technology, society, and trade of every population they encountered. Not only does
the concept of the Vikings have a firm hold in the Danish society to this day, but Scandinavian traces are still apparent in the dialects of Scotland and
Northern England today. However, their beliefs and rituals were so strong that they would not be eclipsed by the later clutch of Christianity, which
started when Harold II Bluetooth, the ruler of Denmark, converted to Christianity in

Cnut The Great Essay Outline
Cnut the Great, also known as Canute, was the son of Denmark's King Svein Forkbeard and helped his father to conquer England in the year 1013.
After Svein's death, the exiled Anglo–Saxon king, Ethelred the Unready, returned to power, but died in 1016 and was succeeded by his son Edmund
Ironside, who signed a treaty that gave Cnut power over part of England after being defeated at the Battle of Ashingdon later that year (1016).
However, Edmund died a few weeks later and all of England came under Cnut's rule. His reign brought stability after years of raids and battles.
Eventually, Denmark, Norway, and possibly parts of Sweden also came to be under his rule, forming a vast empire that is often referred to as the
Anglo–Scandinavian or North Sea Empire. His son Harold Harefoot became king when Cnut died in 1035, and served until his death in 1040. Cnut's
other son, Harthacnut, then ascended to the throne; his death in 1042 marked the end of Danish rule in England. King Cnut's most famous quote goes
as follows: "Let all men know how empty and powerless is the power of kings. For there is none worthy of the name but God, whom heaven, earth,
and sea obey."
Harald Hardrada was born Harald Sigurdsson in the year 1015 in Norway. He fought as a teenager at the Battle of Stiklestad, which was waged in 1030
by his ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This decor was used to make the ship appear as intimidating and fearsome as possible. The Viking ship was undoubtedly the most impressive of the
Vikings' achievements and played a vital role in Viking life. The owners of these magnificent ships deemed them to be their proudest possessions, as
they were regarded as prodigiously grand treasures and thought of as living

Advantages Of William The Conqueror
The study of the period of 1066 has been hard for historians due to the lack of contemporary sources. Therefore, much of the surviving material is
Norman in focus and written some time after 1066. After the death of the King, Harold readied himself for the Norman invasion which he knew
must come, and it is this fact when considered alongside the Norman perspectives, which suggest Harold's awareness of a broken oath. He posted
sentries along the coast in order that he should be given ample warning of Harold's approach, allowing a historian to conclude that he was of a
cautious disposition, a vital quality in any commander, and that he had a good working knowledge of the tactics of war i.e. he was not inexperienced.
Furthermore, he sent at least... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Firstly, along with choosing not to rest long enough in York to travel back down with the army he had fought at Stamford Bridge with, Harold had
succeeded in alienating many of the men that had constituted this army with his refusal not to split the treasure gained from the decimation of the
Norwegians. This decision probably had some merit in the circumstances of the time. It is entirely possible that the gold was needed for the war
against Normandy or that the booty was in the form of boats which Harold intended to use in combat. Nonetheless, Harold's pronouncement caused
outright desertion in the troops. Secondly, despite the long stay of William's fleet at Dives and England's superior ship fleet Harold attempted none
of Drake's tactics and failed to singe William's beard. Perhaps most importantly when one considers Harold's tactical errors was his removal of the
Hastings force. After the sighting of Halley's Comet Harold had gathered a huge force, with the threat of Harald Hardrada some of these men,
including the Hastings guard, had been redeployed. However, in anticipation of William's attack a garrison had been left to guard the natural ports of
Romney and Dover. This is yet another example of William's supernatural luck. This is my last

Write An Essay On Edward The Conqueror
It started in 911 AD, when the Carolingian Dynasty gave approval to a group of Vikings known as Norsemen, to settle in Normandy, Northwest of
France. On behalf of the settlement, the Vikings converted into Christians and pledged that they will protect the north coast from other Viking
raiders. These Norsemen developed their language from Norse and French to Norman language. In 1002 AD the King of England decided to settle
with the sister of Duke of Normandy. The happily married couple then had a son known as "Edward the Conqueror" which lives exile of Normandy.
As years flew by, the King died,on meaning that his son Edward will now take over and become England's new king. Afterall, Edward decides that he
will bring Normans into power, including Duke William of Normandy. With the struggle and stress of being a King, the great Edward... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
King Harald invaded northern England, on September, 1066. Battle of Stamford Bridge took place, with both rivals King Harold and King Harald.
Ultimately, King Harold defeated King Harald.
After the northern part of England was invaded, a month later in October, 1066 Duke William invaded the southern part of England. On the 14th of
October, King Harold's death took place in the most well–known combat known as the Battle of Hastings. William took claim of England and this was
the last time someone invaded England successfully.
Throughout the long years, Normans had a big impact on England. Many accomplishments occurred such as empty lands with built castles, wealth was
concentrated to a very small group of individuals, slavery was extinguished, and Latin and French became the language of law, culture, and
government. English was later developed from Anglo Saxon and Norman language. ENglish was taken over by Norsmans and a system of government
was

How Did Duke Williams Win The Battle Of Hastings
Duke Williams: The Winner of The Battle of Hastings
What if the Candidates for the president of the U.S. had to fight in a battle to see who would win the election. As crazy as it sounds, this is how
Duke Williams became King of England in 1066. In January of 1066 the death of King Edward the Confessor was the beginning of the Battle of
Hastings. When King Edward died, he had no children to inherit the throne. The legend says that before his death, King Edward sat up and pointed to
Harold Godwinson who was across the room ("Hastings"). Shortly after he died, Harold became the King of England. There were three other people
who fought to be heir to the throne. Harold defeated two of them fairly quickly. He had hoped he could also defeat the third opponent, Duke
Williams, but this was not the case. On October 14, 1066 the Battle between Harold and Duke Williams, later to be known as the Battle of Hastings,
began. Duke Williams was the leader of the Norman army and led his troops to victory at the Battle of Hastings because of his great plan of attack
("The Battle of Hastings").
Duke Williams's army was very ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He left many of his foot soldiers behind and exhausted the others. He had a traditional Saxon army, his housecarls fought on foot with axes ("The
Norman Conquest"). King Harold's plans were destroyed to deal with Duke William's invading force from Normandy. Viking forces greater than those
expected from the Normans. Harold had to move his army to defend his kingdom from the Vikings (Alchin). The leaders of Harold's army had swords
and javelins, but the rest of the men were inexperienced fighters and carried weapons such as iron–studded clubs, scythes, and slings ("Battle of
Hastings"). Harold was forced, albeit reluctantly, to release the levied men from service and stand down his navy for the coming winter. This left him
only his professional mounted infantry (Alchin). In the end Duke Williams invaded

Essay On Viking King
The Last Great Viking Leader
In our society, we remember the Vikings as a heritage of ruthless, land–ravaging, horned helmet wearing, blonde haired, white men. However, only one
of those stereotypes is historically correct–their ruthless tendencies. Vikings were not known as Vikings until they had long disassembled, they were
primarily known as Danes. Their homelands were located in the northern areas of Denmark, Norway, and Sweden, three countries of Scandinavia. Like
any other powerful leader and person, Harald Sigurdsson 'Hardrada', which is an epithet given to him, had strengths, weaknesses, climaxes and
downfalls throughout his life, beginning on his nameday in 1015 AD (Mandal). Viking kings are still remembered and their stories are... Show more
They lived in centralized farming villages in hall–like houses, and families all lived together in the one house (Hauge). Everyone pitched in on the
farm or in the house. While women still had some restrictions, they were far less stressed than other heritages, "The division between a woman's and
man's domain was established at the doorstep. The outside work belonged to the man and the inside work belonged to the woman", however women
could be warriors if that was their choosing (Hauge). Vikings were driven to be honorable men, an honorable man described through Viking heritage
is a generous, courteous, and loyal man. However, if a man was to become disgraced in society there were specific ways to deal with that; confronting
the source of condemnation. Which in turn made revenge an important part of their society and could be how the Vikings attained their ruthless
description (Hauge). The Vikings lived based on a government formed millennia ago, which was highly advanced for their time period, "Viking society
was self–regulated. Law and order was based upon the Thing system, which had already been established via common–meetings dating to least 600
AD. The Thing had legislative and judiciary powers. Among other items, the Vikings elected their King at the Thing" (Hauge). However, Harald wasn't
elected King, he fought for his

Medieval Era Research Paper
The medieval period in Britain lasted from 1066 to 1485 (The Medieval Period). The Medieval period was a period of great wars, diseases and the
rise of the English monarchy. I will list some of the more important events in this paragraph. The period began with the Norman invasion of England,
and ended with beginning of the Tudor dynasty. During this period eastern Ireland and all of Whales came under the direct rule of the monarchy, while
Scotland managed to stay independent. In 1215 the Magna Carta was written, marking the first time a monarch agreed to follow formal procedures.
The Third Crusade between the years 1189 – 1192 was led by the English king Richard the Lionheart, where the city of Jerusalem was besieged by the
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Hundred Years' war began in the year 1337, caused by tensions between The English and The French, because of English land possessions in
France. The Hundred Years' ended in 1453 with the English having lost most of their French land (Hundred Year's). The Battle of Bosworth Field was
a battle fought between the armies of Richard III and Henry Tudor. Richard III died in the battle and Henry Tudor won, marking the end of the
medieval period in British History(Henry III). functions have been undertaken over time by its subdivisions, which have also been subject to periodic
reform.
The Battle of Hastings was fought on 14 October in the year 1066 shortly after the Norman invasion of England. The most important event before the
battle was the death of Edward the Confessor, king of England, and the coronation of his successor Harold Godwinson. Across the Channel in France,
William, was set on claiming the English crown for himself. With the support of the Pope and from his nobles, William set made plans for invading
England. The prelude to William's invasion was an attack on Yorkshire by Tostig Godwinsson, who was king Harold's exiled brother, and Norwegian
Vikings, led by Harald Hardrada. This attack would be known as the Battle of Stamford bridge, where Harold Godwinson defeated the attackers and
both Harald and Tostig

Bayeaux Tapestry Experience
Assignment 2– Bayeux Tapestry Experience Dana Whitcomb Professor Dr. Jane El
–Yacoubi HUM 111 17 November 2011 I write this letter to the
people of France, my countrymen and family. I, William, Duke of Normandy am on the verge of solidifying our great nation with land that was
rightfully entitled to me. After breaking an oath of allegiance, Harold of Wessex shall pay the ultimate price for his treasonous act of claiming a
crown not meant for him. Now as we prepare to wage battle, with the backing of the Pope and all the Holy powers blessed upon me, I shall be
victorious. Thanks to the friendly winds which guided us across the channel, we arrive... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
"Count Eustace carries an elaborate banner, one given by the Pope to show his support for this invasion of England" (Museum of Reading, 2011).
Destiny appears to be on our side, for the English fortifications have weakened. Our soldiers break through their shield wall and continue with the
carnage. As bodies dot the landscape, the spoils of war are going to the victors. Shields and armor taken from slain English soldiers will
accompany us back home as proof of our victory. Finally as fate would have it, Harold of Wessex has fallen! Shot through the eye with an arrow,
the accuracy given that archer must have been blessed to him by God himself. As Harold fell and his body hacked to ensure death, I realize my
destiny is complete. The very crown Harold swore under oath to me is now mine via the blade of a Norman sword. Let this be a lesson to those
who lie upon the sacred relics, fate will reveal itself in time. I, William, Duke of Normandy and King of England will punish all deceivers as I did
the English. People of France, I leave you with one last validation of how your fellow Normans achieved victory, "Et fuga verterunt angli. And the
English fled" (Crack, 1998). References Crack, G. R. (1998, January 10). The Bayeux Tapestry. Retrieved November 14, 2011, from Hastings
1066.com: http://hastings1066.com/index.html Hagen, R.–M. a. (2005, September 9). Bayeux Tapestry: Propaganda on

Essay on William the Conqueror
William I became known as William the Conqueror through his will and determination. William gained power through his father and soon he
climbed high enough to conquer England and become its new king. William was born in 1028 at Falaise Castle. He was the son of Robert the Duke
of Normandy and Herleve, the daughter of a tanner in Falaise. Robert was said to have caught sight of Herleve while she was washing her linens in
the castle moat. William's father went on a pilgrimage in 1034 to release his sins. While returning home from his journey, he died suddenly. Having no
other heir, William took his place as Duke ofNormandy. William had a hard time taking control. People constantly rebelled during his rule, and he
would have to learn ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In the middle of September, England was invaded by Harold Hardrada, King of Norway. He was accompanied by Tostig, Earl of Northumbria,
Harold's unruly and discontented brother, who had earlier been banished and his earldom confiscated Harold went north to meet the invaders at
Stamford Bridge in Yorkshire, where he won a victory over the Viking army. The winds William had been waiting for turned favorable and he set
sail with his massive army. News of his landing at Pevensey was told to Harold, who responded by hurrying south to meet him, giving his exhausted
army no rest. If Harold had rested and reorganized his army, the outcome of the battle and English history could have been very different. On the 14th
of October, the Saxon and Norman forces clashed in the Battle of Hastings. Harold took up a defensive position on Senlac Ridge. The Norman army
was forced to attack uphill, placing them at a disadvantage. A rumor arose in the Norman ranks that William was dead, causing panic. Many of the
Saxon fyrdd pursued the fleeing Normans down the hill. William raised his armies morale by loudly announcing that he was still alive. The Normans
with new strength fought hard against the Saxons, Harold's brothers Gyrth and Leofwine were both slain on the battlefield. The battle continued for
most of the

How Did William Win the Battle of Hastings
Why did William win the battle of Hastings? In this essay I am writing about why William Duke of Normandy won the battle of Hastings. At the
time of Edward the confessor there were three claimants to the English throne. One of the claimants was Harold's. He believed he should be on the
throne because he was Edward the confessor's brother; he was born in England and was the most powerful English earl. The next claimant was
William duke of Normandy. William believed he should be king because Edward the confessor promised him the throne for his support and Harold
swore an oath on holy relics that he would be king. The last claimant to the throne was Harald Hardraada; Harold believed he should be king because
there had been Viking kings... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
When the battle had started the Norman army got could not break down the shield wall. * Hoar Apple Tree Caldbec Hill Telham Hill French
Norman Breton Senlac Hill King Harold London Hastings William English shieldwall Battle of Hastings, October 1066 William's army Archers
Infantry Cavalry * During the battle the Normans struggled to break down the shield wall. They could not break the shield wall. After a while the
Normans started to think that William was dead they started to retreat but William took of his helmet and said "I'm still alive". The English opened
the shield wall and charged down hill but the Normans were confident again Harold was killed and that was the fight. Harold could have been
victories if he kept his wall strong and not charged down hill. The main reasons William won were that the English charged down hill and that gave
them an opportunity. BY ARJAN SINGH 7H This picture shows the lineup of the army before the battle. It is Cleary shown that William had a
stronger army and lots more men. This picture shows the English shield wall during the battle and how effective it was against the

Battle Of Hastings Research Paper
The Battle of Hastings
In January of 1066, King Edward the Confessor of England died. He did not have any children so there wasn't an heir to the throne. Harold
Godwinson from England, Duke William from Normandy and Harald Hardrada king of Norway all wanted to be king of England. Harold Godwinson
the most powerful man in England after Edward and who was related to Queen Elizabeth II was named king. The Battle of Hastings was the
culmination of a fierce conflict over who succeeded King Edward the Confessor. Initially this contest was between three potential heirs. Harold was
able to defeat one of them pretty quickly but Duke William II of Normandy was a difficult opponent. According to the History Channel this became
known as The Battle of Hastings. The Normans won the Battle of Hastings because William was a superior leader. King Harold was not as prepared as
William. First of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Harold actually had a better position than William because he was on a rise and they were able to make a shield wall to protect themselves. It
wasn't really a fairly fought battle. The battle was on Senlac Hill, which was only seven miles from Hastings, England. William's fleet arrived from
Normandy on September 28, 1066, which was a French province. At some point, the wall broke down and William's troops began to be victorious.
(Bishop). The Normans had to shoot uphill because they were below. At first, everyone thought that William had been killed so the English attackers
started down the hill. William had three horses killed under him. William took off his helmet to prove that he was alive and his troops formed a
counterattack and started beating the English. (Historylearningsite.com). William had "ordered his men to 'retreat' – an old Norman trick to move their
enemy out of heavily fortified places – so that the shield wall had to be broken down by the English".

How Did The Norman Conquest Influence Western Civilization
The Norman Conquest was a very important time in 1066. It was a very brutal time and many people died. During the Norman Conquest more than
100,000 people died.
The Norman Conquest was a very brutal time during 1066 A.D. Therefore, the Norman Conquest involved many people during its brutal battle.
However, the Norman conquest changed the course of history, and so doing greatly influenced the Western civilization. For quite some time, the
Normans were interested in the wealth of nearby England. As Edward the Confessor, was laid down to die, he supposedly promised to give the
English crown to Harold. Edward was actually a weak ruler when he was the ruler of England. Before Edward was king, there was a king called
Harthacnut, but when he died they made Edward the new king. There were actually several other claimants though, such as Edward the son of
Edmindieinside and King Magnus of Norway. The Norman descendants became a ruling class in England. In addition, the Norman conquest began in
the year of 1066, and ended in the year of 1485. The Norman COnquest was simply an invasion by, William the Conqueror.... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
He fought the Battle of Hastings on October 14, 1066. However, he only battled at two different place, those places were Hastings and Stamford
Bridge. On September, William, Duke of Normandy, begins to move his army across the English Channel to England, he took horses with his army as
well. Therefore, William was crowned king of England at Westminster Abbey. When William arrived in England, he established a Norman rule of a
strong foundation. He was one of the most important people in the Norman Conquest, and during the battle of Hastings. William claimed that Edward
the confessor or promised him the English throne after he died. William and his army fought their way across the land of England, while they where
burning and

Individualism In The Vikings
While the Viking Era was rather brief, these infamous Scandinavian brutes left a mark in history larger than they themselves were tall.
The Vikings emerged from the present–day area in Northern Europe known as Scandinavia, which consists of the countries of Sweden, Denmark, and
Norway. Named for their legendary raids, the name "Viking" is said to mean "a pirate raid" and originates from a dead language called "Old Norse",
which was the native tongue of the Vikings.
Contrary to the widely Christian beliefs of the rest of medieval Europe, the Vikings held pagan religious belief, meaning that they were polytheistic
and believed in many gods. These beliefs were flexible and corresponded to each individual Viking.
The beings the Vikings worshiped ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Clair–sur–Epte, Charles the Simple, the King of the West Franks, gave Rollo part of the area Normandy, also known as Northman's land, in a bid to
have him shelter it from other Viking raiders. Rollo later expanded his control of the region. He was then succeeded by his son William Longsword
around the time of his death in about 928. In 1066, William the duke of Normandy, another of Rollo's descendants, led a successful invasion of
England; he became known as "William the Conqueror" and went on to serve as king of England until

How Did The Battle Of Hastings Affect England
People are impacted by outside factors, by events that occur around them. Many times so called "big" events impact the so called "little" or ordinary
people. There are individuals who dispute this claim, and assert that "the decisions of the great [do not] affect little people at all." While this may
seem like an accurate stance to hold, the Battle of Hastings provides evidence against this. The Battle of Hastings "represented a turning point in
English life for serfs, the old nobility, the English language, justice, tenure, and religion," and thus greatly impacted the lives of ordinary folk in
England. The Battle of Hastings was fought in 1066, and its outcome greatly impacted England. After Edward the Confessor, the king of England, died,
three men argued over who should inherit the throne. Harold Godwinson assumed the throne, while Harald Hardrada, King of Norway, and Duke...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Since King Harold had defeated Harald Hardrada, the King of Norway, this battle "marked the end of any real Viking threat to the fortunes of
Europe." This affected the lives of common folk, who did not than have to worry about being raided by the Vikings. Another more immediate effect
of William the Conqueror's victory was that England was now ruled by the Normans. This directly changed the destiny of the common people
because the Normans "demanded more work, more dues, and a tighter interpretation of [the common farmer's] legal standing and relations to the
manor lord." The local common people also viewed the Normans were foreigners, especially because they spoke English with an accent, or differently
than that of the common folk. Others changes resulting from the Battle of Hastings were that "the local court was now more imposing and introduced
trials by ordeal for cases that could not be resolved in any other way." This effect on the judicial system also impacted the lives of the ordinary

Explain Why William Win The Battle Of Hastings
WHY DID WILLIAM WIN THE BATTLE OF HASTINGS?
The Battle of Hastings took place in 1066 because Edward the Confessor died leaving no heir to the throne. Almost immediately Harold Godwinson
seized the throne and declared himself king but he had two opponents, Harald Hadrada and William of Normandy. William eventually won the battle
and was crowned King of England, this piece of writing explains why.
One major reason why William won the Battle of Hastings is that Harold's army was not prepared to fight William as they had been in the east
fighting Harald Hadrada. They were immediately forced to move south towards the coast and fight William, even though Harold's army was now
severely smaller then before the battle of Stamford Bridge, as many of his men had deserted him.
William also had good tactics and when Harold's shield wall was too strong for William's cavalry to break through, so his men pretended to retreat,
causing the Saxons to run after them, including some men in the shield wall, which meant that the shield wall was now broken. ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Beforehand however, Harold Godwinson was prepared in the south for William's invasion but the wind's positioning in Normandy meant that William
could not set sail yet and unluckily for Harold, Harald Hadrada decided to attack at this very moment which meant that Harold had to march his army
north–east to fight Harald, whilst at the same time William had arrived in England and was preparing his men for battle, feeding them and letting them
have some rest, whilst Harold's were fighting and his numbers decreasing. Eventually Harald Hadrada was killed and Harold Godwinson won the
battle, but news soon came through that William had invaded in the south and Harold had to march his men then after just fighting a big battle and, for
this reason, many of Harold's men deserted

Most Important Reasons To Clue B. Why Did The People Die?
During 1956, a skull was found near River Ouse. It was found near the village of Ricall, Yorkshire. A farmer was happily digging his crops until he
felt something solid and hard. He scraped the soil and found a human skeleton! He called the police but the police decided the bones were not modern
bones so they decided to call the archaeologists. They found sixty–nine more bones. Some questions to consider is: Why are the bones here? How did
the people die? Why did the people die? When did the people die? Who are these people? All of the clues were very useful and took us a step
further to knowing what happened. I used all the clues except for clue A which only shows us the bones and clue E which are a copy of clue B but
with a route so I think they are both unnecessary.... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
I chose clue G as one of the most important clues because it tells us most of the story and what happened. One of the reasons I also chose clue B as
an important clue is because it tells us that there was a battle between the Norwegians and the North of England. In my opinion, the least important
clues were clue C and E. Clue C tells us if there was a church which is unnecessary because we can see the other clues there was a battle and it did
not have any big connection to the church. I think clue E is just a copy of clue B but with a route of the Norwegian soldiers. Till now the mystery
has been mostly solved. I know that the people who died mostly came from Norway and Denmark. This tells me that It was most likely the Battle
of Stamford Bridge because the Norwegians were beaten by King Harold of England after a long bloody battle. I also know that there were lots of
axes and swords. Although I still don't know who are these people and why children were there, were they fighting or were they trying to escape the

Harold Godwinson : A Powerful Anglo Saxon Family
Introduction
Harold Godwinson was born in the 1022s to a powerful Anglo–Saxon family in Wessex, United Kingdom. Throughout his life, he achieved many great
things, including being the last Anglo–Saxon to be crowned King of England and being the Earl of Wessex. He was at the top of the social structure
from the 6th of January 1066 until his death fighting the Norman Invaders on the 14th of October at the Battle of Hastings. The Battle of the Hastings
was a major event during this time period and marked the beginning of the Norman Conquest of England.
Harold Godwinson
[https://www.britroyals.com/kings.asp?id=edward2]
Where did they live?
Harold Godwinson grew up in his birthplace of Wessex, UK. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
(see graph below).
The feudal system pyramid of power
[http://vanderland.weebly.com/the–feudal–system.html]
It starts at the top with the king granting his land to a baron for soldiers all the way down to a peasant getting land to grow crops. Under the feudal
system land is granted to people for service, which means if you stay loyal and remain a good person you were granted with some land as a thank
you. The main and largest society in the feudal system was the peasants or serfs that owned no land and had no power. Most peasants worked on
farms and lived in the countryside in order to supply the upper class with popular crops. Along with this everybody in the society during the
medieval times were expected to attend a Catholic church because everyone lived in fear of being sent to hell. Many prayed for good luck in war,
even though they were happy to die fighting because they believed you were the dying in gods hands. In reward for obeying the rules of church,
which was to attend all rituals and pay taxes, you were believed to be spending your afterlife in heaven and eternity. In contrast, if one was to
commit any sins you were sent to hell as punishment. Purgatory is in between heaven and hell. This was believed to take place when you committed
a sin but God gave you a chance to still go to heaven. There, you would pay for your sins before entering

Marketing Management
DBA 1652 Marketing Management UNIT –– I
Unit No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Unit Title Marketing management– an introduction Marketing
environment Marketing with other functional areas of management Market segmentation Market targeting and positioning Product management Brand
management Pricing Channel design and management Retailing and Wholesaling Integrated Marketing Communication Advertising management Sales
promotion Personal selling Public relations Understanding individual consumer behaviour Understanding industrial consumer behaviour Customer
satisfaction Customer relationship management Marketing of services Rural marketing Types of marketing research Process of marketing ... Show more
Marketing consists of all the activities to facilitate the exchange. Within this societal perspective, then (1) the makers (2) what they are marketing
and (3) their potential markets all assume broad dimensions. The category of marketers might include, in addition to business firms, such diverse
social units as (a) a political party trying to market its candidate to the public (b) the director of an art museum providing new exhibits to generate
greater attendance and financial support (c) a labor union marketing its idea to members and to company management; and (d) professors trying to
make their courses interesting for students. In addition to the range of items normally considered as products and services, what is being marketed
might include (a) ideas such as reducing air pollution or contributing to the red cross (b) people, such as new football coach or a political candidate
and (c) places, such as industrial plant sites or a place to for a vocation. In a broad sense markets include more than the direct consumers of products
services and ideas. Thus a state university's market includes the legislators who provide funds, the citizens living near the university who may be
affected by university activities and the alumni. A business firms market may include government regulatory agencies, environmentalists, and local tax
assessors. Definition of Marketing As you already know there are

Explain Why the Arab Invasions of 710 and 711 Were so...
Explain why the Arab invasions of 710 and 711 were so successful. In answering this question we must first appreciate the difficulty historians face in
discovering the real truth of the early Arab invasions, a fact well demonstrated in the varying estimates of Arab invasion forces (ranging from
1,700–9000 in current publications). Scant contemporary evidence exists beyond a short narrative present in a Spanish chronicle of 754, a vital
surviving Islamic administrative document of the time, and some archaeological remains. Our knowledge of the invasions is largely founded on the
works of later Islamic historians, the Ajbar Machmua text for example and the works of Ibn Idhari and al Maqqari. Unfortunately there are fewer
Christian... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The existence of a rival claimant caused dangerous divisions throughout the kingdom and in Akhila's demesne land of Tarragona and Narbonne coins
were minted without the king's image, a clear measure of defiance. It is also reported in some sources that during the invasion Akhila conspired with
the Arabs to depose Roderic. Some go as far as to say that during the final battle a wing of Roderic's army loyal to Akhila turned on him in the midst of
the fighting. Whether this is true can hardly be proven but something catastrophic must have happened for the King's army supposedly far larger than
Tarik's (Estimates 24,000–30,000 ) to suffer such a devastating defeat. Many historians support the idea that elements within the Visigothic nobility
gave assistance to the invaders probably as a means of removing Roderic. It is unlikely however that they foresaw the long term implications of the
invasion and the extension of Muslim presence in Iberia. It is argued that as well as the problems the succession dispute posed, the very fabric of
Visigothic society itself was weak. It is suggested that the Visgothic nobility of the time, who had placed themselves above the native Hispano–Roman
population in terms of rights and privileges, were suffering a backlash from the lower sections of society. Incidents of rebellion had increased as had
the number of slaves deserting their Lords. Many runaways turned to outlawry and as a consequence

Management Course: Mbaв€’10 General Management
Management
Course: MBAв€’10 General Management
California College for Health Sciences MBA Program
McGraw–Hill/Irwin
abc
McGrawв€’Hill Primis ISBN: 0в€’390в€’58539в€’4 Text: Effective Behavior in Organizations, Seventh Edition Cohen Harvard Business Review
Finance Articles The Power of Management Capital Feigenbaumв€’Feigenbaum
International Management, Sixth Edition Hodgettsв€’Luthansв€’Doh Contemporary Management, Fourth Edition Jonesв€’George Driving
Shareholder Value Morinв€’Jarrell
Leadership, Fifth Edition Hughesв€’Ginnettв€’Curphy The Art of M & A: Merger/Acquisitions/Buyout Guide, Third Edition Reedв€’Lajoux
and others . . .
This book was printed on recycled paper. Management
http://www.mhhe.com/primis/online/
Copyright ©2005 by ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
What will be the effect of the rapid gyrations in markets that emphasize the difficulties that accounting practices face in determining true performance
costs and that forecasting programs confront in establishing the economic determinants of corporate planning? In addition to these challenges, many
analytical and strategic evaluation approaches that are used in an attempt to identify and project how well a company is performing have been
overwhelmed by the frequency and magnitude of these economic groundswells. In today's competitive climate, where the changes outside a business

exceed the productive changes within a business, a company's future viability is clearly under enormous stress. To maintain business growth and a
sustained economy, it is essential for managers to understand and find solutions for these and other fundamental wide–ranging issues. The bursting of
the high–tech bubble both in many start–up companies and in major segments of established firms dissipated many entrepreneurial efforts and the large
sums of money that were spent to create organizations that never earned a profit and were often hugely unsuccessful as business entities. However, this
enormous cost to some companies also created beneficial impacts for many other companies in dealing with these fundamental wide–ranging issues.
These beneficial impacts had

The Revolt Of The Fens
The Revolt in the Fens was lead by Hereward and had been strengthened by refugees from the harrowing of Northumberland, including Earl Mokar.
During this same time Osbjorn was taken bribes that had weakened the army. However, even while his brother, Jarl Osbjorn could be bought off,
but King Swein of Denmark and his new fleet was not offered this same deal and was preparing for battle. During this his brother Jarl Osbjorn and
his fleet had been bought off, King Swein of Denmark and his new fleet had not. What happened during 1070 and 1071 could be consider fact as it
could legend. It is know that William made two different attempts both unsuccessful, either in person or through a lieutenant to take Isle Ely where
Hereward and his forces were based. We also know that Hereward did not fear to pay for his Danish allies. Hereward paid the Danish to sack the
Peterborough and its Cathedral, which was now controlled by the Norman Bishop. What it is still up to debate is how thing exact happenings, nor the
sequence of events. Eventually Swein, maybe seeing himself in a no win situation, gave the offer to be paid off. The Normans soon took Ely after the
betrayal of the local monks secret causeways though the Fens that would allow an army to access the isle. Although Ely fell in 1071, Hereward
escaped and, with loyal followers, remained a nuisance to king William for many more years to come. In 1072 another thorn in William side came
form the scots with their numbers swelling by

Essay on Edgar Atheling
History is but a series of stories, opinions, and biases that give the world today a glimpse through the window of the past. As it is such, that window is
often smudged and smeared because of the many contradicting, differing facets that one moment in history can possess; henceforth figures and details
become obscured and lost, thereby creating the many great and fascinating gaps in history that haunt the minds of today's historians. This paper is an
attempt to provide evidence to fill such a gap–the lost story of Edgar Atheling, great half–nephew of King Edward the Confessor of England; also to
provide an answer to the puzzling question of why Edgar was never killed by King William I (William the Conqueror, also Duke of Normandy). The...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, Edward did something very odd–he promised the crown to William, Duke of Normandy–a cousin through Edward's mother, Emma. This
perplexingly odd promise was made even stranger when, according to the Bayeux Tapestry, Harold was shipwrecked off the coast of Normandy
and brought to stay at the court of William. There he supposedly swore an unbreakable oath, giving William his loyalty and support in his path to
the crown. He returned to England. Yet when the king died, his dying words seemed to be appointing Harold "protector" of England, which was
interpreted as "king". So Harold was named the king, breaking his supposed promise to William. Furious, William invaded England. Freshly
crowned, Harold was not only dealing with this Norman threat, but also an invading Norwegian Viking army, led by Harald Hardrada, who, like
William, also believed he had a claim to the throne. Harold easily defeated Harald's forces at the Battle of Stamford Bridge (near York), but then was
forced to drive his tired, bedraggled army to Hastings to confront the invading Norman troops. There, at the famed Battle of Hastings, William became
William the Conqueror, decisively defeating the English, killing Harold, and winning the crown.
These clouds of intrigue block the sunlight from another, even deeper buried face in the year

King Of Normandy A Hero's Journey
Shortly after his father would perish on a pilgrimage to Jerusalem he was appointed the new Duke at the age of 8. At a young age violence was at
an uproar at a young age he was already experienced in war but with the help of King Henry the first of France, William would be able to survive
all of the attacks they would endure. They fought and would clash war after war. William bending never breaking, this would eventually help him
gain a lot of experience on how war works. He would have guardians who would take care of him, such as Alan of Brittany after his death gilbert of
Brionne took charge in William and he was killed in months and there was another guardian he was also killed the same time gilbert was. After
constantly being attacked he was forced to seek king henry of France who molded him and made him to the ruthless leader he was to become.
After leaving Normandy for so long, William made his return back in 1047 and asserted his authority destroying all of the rebels after that making
the claim as the undisputed Duke of Normandy. William of Normandy matured into a tall man with red hair. During this time The Duke of
Normandy went to visit his cousin Edward the confessor, It was during this visit that he would be promised William the kingdom should he die. The
true heir was Edgar Atheling who is Edwards great nephew, but he was still a child who knew very little about England, but Edward who was
appointed the king in 1042 promised him in that right. It would so happen that with Harold crash landing on Normandy as a Duke he would have to
take him in even if it was unwilling, with this Edward

What Is A Comparison Of The Popular Games In Football?
After less than exciting action in the Premier League last weekend, fans hope to see less scoreless draws and more thrilling contests this week. With
a London Derby taking place and some of the midweek games repeating in the Carabao Cup, let's quickly look back to what happened last week in the
Premier League.
The Chelsea, Arsenal derby was a rather drab affair, as neither team looked like it really wanted to score. Many (including myself) predicted that
Chelsea would walk all over the Gunners. But Arsene Wenger's side played respectfully well to a 0–0 draw and produced something they haven't for
roughly six years at Stamford Bridge – a point.
Elsewhere, Roy Hodgson's tenure as Palace boss didn't get off to the greatest start, as his ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Fans could love this contest, while also hoping that Spurs' away form doesn't lead to the Hammers playing in another match that draws crickets.
Elsewhere is the battle of the newly promoted striped teams, Brighton facing off against Newcastle. Both teams have faced differing fortunes, as
Brighton managed their only three–point match in the EPL two weeks ago, while Newcastle is on a three–game winning streak. Brighton could be out
for revenge, as their sloppy play at the end of last season lost them the Championship title to Newcastle. This should be a great Sunday kickoff.
And lastly, Leicester versus Liverpool, a match that was also played in the Carabao Cup on Tuesday, resulting in a 2–0 Leicester win, should be
another spicy affair. Liverpool hopes to bounce back from that loss, not to mention the draw against Burnley last Saturday, a game they easily could
have lost. The Reds also hope that Philippe Coutinho quickly rediscovers his scoring form and leads them to glory.
So, what are the fixtures that lie ahead this weekend?
Week 6 Fixtures
Saturday, Sept. 23, 2017
West Ham United (1–1–3) vs. Tottenham Hotspur (2–2–1) | 7:30 a.m. Eastern Time, 12:30 p.m. British Time

Everton (1–1–3) vs. Bournemouth (1–0–4) | 10 a.m. Eastern Time, 3 p.m. British Time
Southampton (2–2–1) vs. Manchester United (4–1–0) | 10 a.m. Eastern Time, 3 p.m. British Time
Manchester City (4–1–0) vs. Crystal Palace (0–0–5) | 10 a.m. Eastern Time, 3 p.m. British Time

Essay on Why William Won the Battle of Hastings
Why William Won the Battle of Hastings
The Battle of Hastings in 1066 saw Harold the king of England defeated by William, Duke of Normandy. It was a great victory for William, he became
King of England and was called 'William the Conqueror.' There were many reasons for William's victory such as religious support, a well–prepared
army, weather, more effective weapons and most importantly superior tactics. Another important factor, which occurs in most battles in history, is that
of luck. Throughout the battle it seemed that William was more fortunate than Harold. As much as William earned victory, Harold made some bad
judgments and serious tactical mistakes.
Good preparation is the foundation ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This meant they were organized and knew what to do when the time came to set sail for England. Everything was perfect for William except for
the strong winds from the north meant it was not possible for his fleet to cross the Channel. He and his men were so desperate that they even
prayed for a south wind. God or luck was on their side as after a thunderstorm the winds changed to a more favourable southerly direction and they
seized the opportunity and set sail. Whilst sailing to England William's fleet got caught in a storm and they had to stop at the Somme estuary. This
should have a disaster for William but luck was on his side, as this way the crossing to England was shorter and when he was finally able to cross,
Harold was in the north of England.
William's landing was well planned and helped by intelligence gathered in the previous months by Normans living in England. He had studied Caesar's
invasion in 55 BC and was not going to make the same mistakes that he did. For example Caesar did not take the weather over the Channel into
consideration and beached his boats in the wrong place, getting them damaged. Williams's decision to land at Pevensey, a lagoon west ofHastings with
very few people there, was important. The lagoon provided shelter from the weather and when the

The Battle of Hastings
The Battle of Hastings – Why Did William Win?
On the 14th of October 1066, Duke William of Normandy defeated King Harold at the Battle of Hastings. His win could be summed up by the fact
that William was a better leader. Other factors that contributed to William's victory include: William was better prepared, the English army was
severely weakened as Harold had just fought off an invasion in the North of England, and Harold made a fatal mistake of prematurely entering the
Battle of Hastings.
William was a better leader because although Harold had the upper hand in the battle and they were losing, William managed to outwit and defeat the
English. In the Bayeux Tapestry there is a scene depicting that in the days preceding the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Although he was victorious in both of them, his troops were exhausted and did not have sufficient energy to perform at their best. At the beginning of
the battle, he managed get a good advantage – he positioned his troops on top of a hill, making it difficult for William to get to his army and attack
him. However, towards the end of the battle, William set a trap to draw Harold from his strong position– and he fell for it. Once they were on even
ground, Harold's exhausted troops could not counter the attacks from William's well–trained and nourished army.
The biggest mistake Harold made was entering the Battle of Hastings too early. Harold lost some of his best fighters at the Battle of Stamford
Bridge earlier that day and the rest of his army were tired out from their previous battle. When they finally arrived in the South, he was
overconfident that he could win this battle because of his recent victories. Because of his misjudgement, he decided to rush into battle with
exhausted and unprepared troops. Towards the end of the battle, he fell for the trap that William had set, seeing as he was tired and his troops
couldn't wait to finish them off and get a good rest. If he had given his army only a few days' rest and fed them like William had to his troops, his
chances of winning the battle would have been a lot higher.
Ultimately, it was a

Hbr When Your Core Business Is Dying
TOP–TEAM POLITICS...page 90
WHEN YOUR CORE BUSINESS IS DYING...page 66
Y GE SE PA IN DS CK R M WA A
53
www.hbr.org
April 2007
58
What Your Leader Expects of You
Larry Bossidy
66
Finding Your Next Core Business
Chris Zook
78
Promise–Based Management: The Essence of Execution
Donald N. Sull and Charles Spinosa
90

The Leadership Team: Complementary Strengths or Conп¬‚icting Agendas?
Stephen A. Miles and Michael D. Watkins
100
Avoiding Integrity Land Mines
Ben W. Heineman, Jr.
20 33
FORETHOUGHT HBR CASE STUDY
Why Didn 't We Know?
Ralph Hasson
45
FIRST PERSON
Preparing for the Perfect Product Launch
THOU
SHALT
...page 58
James P. Hackett
111
TOOL KIT
The Process Audit ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
100
100
Avoiding Integrity Land Mines

Ben W. Heineman, Jr.
How do you keep thousands of employees, operating in hundreds of countries, as honest as they are competitive? General Electric's longtime general
counsel describes the systems the company has put in place to do just that.
78
90
4 Harvard Business Review
|
April 2007
|
hbr.org
Cover Art: Joshua Gorchov
continued on page 8
APRIL 2007
14
Departments
12 COMPANY INDEX 14 FROM THE EDITOR 53 2006 MCKINSEY AWARDS AND
2007 MCKINSEY JUDGES
20
What the Boss Wants from You
What should CEOs and their direct reports expect from each other? When Larry Bossidy laid out his views to a group of young executives, they
couldn't take notes fast enough. You don't have to write down what he said, though, because Larry has done it for you here. And it will be on the exam.
88 STRATEGIC HUMOR 111 TOOL KIT

The Process Audit Michael Hammer
Redesigning business processes can generate dramatic improvements in performance, but the effort is notoriously difп¬Ѓcult. Many executives have
п¬‚oundered, uncertain about what exactly needs to be changed, by how much, and when. A new framework can take the mystery out of reengineering
business processes and help you comprehend, plan, and assess your company's process–based transformations.
20 FORETHOUGHT
Firms from developing countries are making a global mark...McDonald's isn't afraid to bite off more than it can chew...Women at Fortune

Battle Of Hastings Dbq
The Battle of Hastings happened on the 14th of October 1066 in East Sussex – which is outside of Hastings. The battle was between Harold
Godwinson and William, duke of Normandy. There are three main reasons why William won the Battle of Hastings; this is because William had a
'head start' and he also has cavalry. The main reason he won was because during the battle William ordered his foot soldiers to run away so that the
English would go downhill after them.
One reason why William won the Battle of Hastings was because of his preparation and readiness for the battle. His army were provided with cavalry
that were trained to kick, bite and head–butt. This is shown in the Bayeux Tapestry and source 3 where there are soldiers seen fighting on horses. I
know that William's half–brother organised the creation of the tapestry so the information on it is likely to be accurate. This meant William won the
Battle of Hastings because he had an extra weapon that the English didn't have therefore could surprise them, attack and leave more damage. ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
William ordered his foot soldiers to fake retreat. This is found in Source 5 because it shows William and Harold's movements. My opinion is that doing
this is very intelligent because doing this tricks the opposing team. This meant that William won the Battle of Hastings because it this meant that the
English got confused so they followed the Normans down the hill, therefore breaking the shield wall. When they were at the bottom of the hill, the
Normans killed the Bretons quickly so without William making this decision, it would've been less likely that the Saxons would've won the Battle of

Essay about 1066: the Year of the Conquest
David Howarth's, "1066: The Year Of The Conquest" Harold of England and William of Normandy were both rulers of great countries, so it stands to
reason that they had some similarities in common. They both new how to lead, and they both knew how to survive in a feudal system. That is about
where their similarities end. Like their leaders, England and Normandy both had similarities due to the time, and how people lived. They both operated
on a feudal system, and they were both prosperous and happy before the Battle of Hastings changed everything.
The feudal system of the time operated on the premise of peasants or serfs, and thanes, or lords. The lords owned the land, and the peasants worked on
it. In turn, they received the protection ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
But it was also a matter of temperament: they loved fighting, while the English – or at least a significant number of them – had begun to discover the
pleasure of having nobody to fight" (Howarth 61).
Afterwards, life in Normandy went on pretty much as usual. Some of their men did not return, but there were always more warriors to take their place.
The thanes that had fought for William took over English lands, and got as much out of them as they could, so they were more prosperous than before.
The Normans drank their wine, and continued with their violent lives. However, the English never became Norman, and they did get their country back.
There is a critical difference between the two countries that seems to have heavily contributed to the reason William won, and Harold lost. Although
his troops were fighting on their home soil, they simply were not as warlike and aggressive as the Normans, and were doomed to failure.
One other reason that the English were at a disadvantage, is that they "had refused to fight each other in civil war, even when Edward ordered them
to do it; but the unlucky Normans, at almost the same time, were ravaged again and again by wars of every size..." (Howarth 63). Clearly, the
English were more used to peace, and the Normans were ready and willing to fight on a moment's notice. They were more prepared, and had a more
aggressive society, so they had an advantage before the battle even began.
William of

Why Did William Win The Battle Of Hasting

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Karina Thomas

More from Karina Thomas (16)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Why Did William Win The Battle Of Hasting