LASA: Etiology and Treatment In M3 Assignment 2 RA , you reviewed a  case study about Jessica, made primary and secondary diagnoses, and  identified differential diagnoses for each principal and secondary  diagnosis. The skills you developed and the feedback you received after  completing this required assignment, will significantly help you in  completing the following LASA. For example, both assignments (RA and  LASA), require you to complete similar tasks such as identifying the  principal and secondary diagnoses, providing rationale for the  diagnoses, and offering differential (alternative) diagnoses. In this assignment, you will discuss the etiology and  treatment of your principal and secondary diagnoses for the following  case study using a minimum of five peer-reviewed sources on etiology and  a minimum of five peer-reviewed sources on treatment. Your paper should  have separate sections for the etiology of each principal and secondary  diagnosis, therapeutic modalities for each principal and secondary  diagnosis, justification of the selected therapeutic modalities for the  disorders, application of the treatment for the disorders, and a  reference page for your sources. Your citations and references should be  in APA style, and your paper should be 8–10 pages in length. Click here to read the second case study (Psychological Evaluation for Homer Brine). Once you read the case, complete the following tasks: Identify a principal and secondary diagnosis for the assigned case study with rationale for each diagnosis. Describe multiple elements of the etiology  for the principal and secondary diagnoses. Explain how the etiology  contributed to each (principal and secondary) diagnosis. Identify a specific therapeutic modality for each principal and secondary diagnosis. Apply therapeutic modality to treat each of the principal and secondary diagnoses in the case study. Identify at least one differential (alternate) diagnosis for the principal and secondary diagnoses. Discuss key cultural factors that may influence diagnosis and treatment. Write in a clear, concise, and organized manner;  demonstrate ethical scholarship in accurate representation and  attribution of sources; and display accurate spelling, grammar, and  punctuation. Include citations in text and at the end of the document in  the correct APA format. Submission Details: By the due date assigned , save your diagnoses as M5_A2_Lastname_Firstname.doc and submit the document to the Submissions Area . LASA is worth 300 points and will be graded according to the following rubric. Because this assignment is worth 30% of your overall  grade in the course, it is particularly important to view the rubric for  additional clarity on the requirements and point values for each  component of the assignment. Assignment Component  Proficient Maximum Points    Identify a principal and secondary diagnosis for the assigned case study with rationale for each diagnosis. ...

1. LASA: Etiology and Treatment
In
M3 Assignment 2 RA
, you reviewed a case study about Jessica, made primary and
secondary diagnoses, and identified differential diagnoses for
each principal and secondary diagnosis. The skills you
developed and the feedback you received after completing this
required assignment, will significantly help you in completing
the following LASA. For example, both assignments (RA and
LASA), require you to complete similar tasks such as
identifying the principal and secondary diagnoses, providing
rationale for the diagnoses, and offering differential
(alternative) diagnoses.
In this assignment, you will discuss the etiology and treatment
of your principal and secondary diagnoses for the following
case study using a minimum of five peer-reviewed sources on
etiology and a minimum of five peer-reviewed sources on
treatment. Your paper should have separate sections for the
etiology of each principal and secondary diagnosis, therapeutic
modalities for each principal and secondary diagnosis,
justification of the selected therapeutic modalities for the
disorders, application of the treatment for the disorders, and a
reference page for your sources. Your citations and references
should be in APA style, and your paper should be 8–10 pages
in length.
Click
here
to read the second case study (Psychological Evaluation for
Homer Brine).

2. Once you read the case, complete the following tasks:
Identify a principal and secondary diagnosis for the assigned
case study with rationale for each diagnosis.
Describe multiple elements of the etiology for the principal and
secondary diagnoses. Explain how the etiology contributed to
each (principal and secondary) diagnosis.
Identify a specific therapeutic modality for each principal and
secondary diagnosis.
Apply therapeutic modality to treat each of the principal and
secondary diagnoses in the case study.
Identify at least one differential (alternate) diagnosis for the
principal and secondary diagnoses.
Discuss key cultural factors that may influence diagnosis and
treatment.
Write in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrate
ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of
sources; and display accurate spelling, grammar, and
punctuation. Include citations in text and at the end of the
document in the correct APA format.
Submission Details:
By the due date assigned
, save your diagnoses as M5_A2_Lastname_Firstname.doc and
submit the document to the
Submissions Area

3. .
LASA is worth 300 points and will be graded according to the
following rubric.
Because this assignment is worth 30% of your overall grade in
the course, it is particularly important to view the rubric for
additional clarity on the requirements and point values for each
component of the assignment.
Assignment Component
Proficient
Maximum Points
Identify a principal and secondary diagnosis for the assigned
case study with rationale for each diagnosis. Identifies at least
one principal and one secondary diagnosis that are rationally
linked to the case provided. Provides detailed information
about how diagnoses were reached and how the client’s
symptoms fit the diagnostic criteria. Evidence is presented in a
logical manner that builds a solid case which supports
diagnostic impressions. 48 Describe multiple elements of the
etiology for the principal and secondary diagnoses. Explain
how the etiology contributed to each (principal & secondary)
diagnosis. Presents a clear understanding of the possible
origins of the principal and secondary diagnoses. Demonstrates
ability to integrate and conceptualize all of the information
presented. Clearly states how the diagnoses/ presenting issue
began (ETIOLOGY) and what may be maintaining them. 48
Identify a specific therapeutic modality for each principal and
secondary diagnoses. Chooses a viable therapeutic modality
that has applications to the principal and secondary diagnoses
and is appropriate for the client. 48 Apply therapeutic

4. modality to treat each of the principal and secondary diagnoses
in the case study. Demonstrates a clear application of the
selected therapeutic modality for treatment of the principal and
secondary diagnoses of the person in the vignette. 48 Identify
at least one differential (alternate) diagnosis for the primary and
secondary diagnosis. Clearly discusses other diagnoses
(differential diagnoses) that were ruled-out as well as specific
reasons for eliminating these diagnoses. 32 Discussed key
cultural factors that may influence diagnosis and treatment.
Describes cultural factors that may influence the diagnoses and
identifies cultural issues that may require additional
exploration. Outlines how the cultural factors influence
treatment options. 48
Academic Writing
Writing is generally clear and in an organized manner. It
demonstrates ethical scholarship in accurate representation and
attribution of sources; and generally displays accurate spelling,
grammar, punctuation. Errors are few, isolated, and do not
interfere with reader’s comprehension.
Citations in text and at the end of the document are in correct
APA format. Writing is generally clear and in an organized
manner. It demonstrates ethical scholarship in accurate
representation and attribution of sources; and generally
displays accurate spelling, grammar, punctuation. Errors are
few, isolated, and do not interfere with reader’s
comprehension.
Citations in text and at the end of the document are in correct
APA format. 28
Total:
300
Due DateOct 8, 2018 11:59 PM
Hide Rubrics

5. Rubric Name: FP6005_M5A2_Grading_Rubric
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first
column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if
the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.CriteriaMaximum
PointsGR1 Identify a principal and secondary diagnosis for the
assigned case study with rationale for each diagnosis.48
points/ 48GR2 Describe multiple elements of the etiology for
the principal and secondary diagnoses. Explain how the
etiology contributed to each (principal & secondary)
diagnosis.48 points/ 48GR3 Identify a specific therapeutic
modality for each principal and secondary diagnoses.48
points/ 48GR4 Apply therapeutic modality to treat each of the
principal and secondary diagnoses in the case study.48
points/ 48GR5 Clearly discusses other diagnoses (differential
diagnoses) that were ruled-out as well as specific reasons for
eliminating these diagnoses.32 points/ 32GR6 Describes
cultural factors that may influence the diagnoses and identifies
cultural issues that may require additional exploration.
Outlines how the cultural factors influence treatment
options.48 points/ 48GR7 Wrote in a clear, concise, and
organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in the
accurate representation and attribution of sources; and
displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.28
points/ 28Total— / 300
Rubric Name: FP6005_M5A2_LASA Rubric
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first
column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if
the rubric uses a numeric scoring
method.MAFP_PO1_Psychological Theory & PracticeLevel 1
UnsatisfactoryLevel 2 EmergingLevel 3 ProficientLevel 4
ExemplaryC1 Principal & Secondary Diagnosis (PO1).
Neglects to identify a principal or secondary diagnosis and

6. neglects to rationally link the diagnosis to the case study.
Neglects to identify a principal or secondary diagnosis or
neglects to rationally link the diagnosis to the case study.
Identifies at least one principal and one secondary diagnosis
that are rationally linked to the case provided. Provides
detailed information about how diagnoses were reached and
how the client’s symptoms fit the diagnostic criteria. Evidence
is presented in a logical manner that builds a solid case which
supports diagnostic impressions.
Identifies one or more principal and secondary diagnoses that
are rationally linked to the case provided and supported by
references. Provides detailed information about how diagnoses
were reached and how the client’s symptoms fit the diagnostic
criteria. Evidence is presented in a logical manner that builds a
solid case which supports diagnostic impressions.
C2 Etiology of Diagnoses (PO1).
Either lacks a description of elements of etiology of one or
more diagnoses or description is inaccurate and incomplete.
Provides a description of elements of etiology of one or more
diagnoses but at least one of the descriptions is inaccurate and
incomplete.
Presents a clear understanding of the possible origins of the
principal and secondary diagnoses. Demonstrates ability to
integrate and conceptualize all of the information presented.
Clearly states how the diagnoses/ presenting issue began
(ETIOLOGY) and what may be maintaining them.
Presents a clear understanding of the possible origins of the
principal and secondary diagnoses based on empirical research.

7. Demonstrates ability to integrate and conceptualize all of the
information presented. Clearly states how the diagnoses/
presenting issue began (ETIOLOGY) and what may be
maintaining them.
C3 Therapeutic Modality (PO1).
Neglects to identify an appropriate therapeutic modality.
Identifies a specific therapeutic modality but neglects to
articulate how it was appropriate for the diagnoses identified.
Chooses a viable therapeutic modality that has applications to
the principal and secondary diagnoses and is appropriate for
the client.
Chooses a viable therapeutic modality that has applications to
the principal and secondary diagnoses and is appropriate for
the client and supported by research literature.
C4 Therapeutic Modality Txt Application (PO1).
Neglects to apply or erroneously applies a therapeutic modality
to treat the diagnosis.
Identifies a specific therapeutic modality but neglects to
articulate how it was appropriate for the diagnoses identified.
Chooses a viable therapeutic modality that has applications to
the principal and secondary diagnoses and is appropriate for
the client.
Chooses a viable therapeutic modality that has applications to
the principal and secondary diagnoses and is appropriate for
the client and supported by research literature.

8. C5 Differential Diagnosis (PO1).
Neglects to identify any alternative diagnosis for either the
primary or secondary diagnosis.
Identifies one alternative diagnosis, but neglects to articulate
rationale for the diagnosis and why it was ruled out.
Clearly discusses other diagnoses (differential diagnoses) that
were ruled-out as well as specific reasons for eliminating these
diagnoses.
Clearly discusses other diagnoses (differential diagnoses) that
were ruled-out as well as specific reasons for eliminating these
diagnoses. Articulates any assessments or additional
information to rule out and alternative diagnosis.
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first
column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if
the rubric uses a numeric scoring
method.MAFP_PO5_Multicultural CompetenceLevel 1
UnsatisfactoryLevel 2 EmergingLevel 3 ProficientLevel 4
ExemplaryC6 Cultural Factors (PO5).
There was no opinion provided on the defendant’s risk of
dangerousness or insanity.
The opinion provided was vague and not well connected to the
case vignette.
Describes cultural factors that may influence the diagnoses and
identifies cultural issues that may require additional
exploration. Outlines how the cultural factors influence
treatment options.
Describes cultural factors that may influence the diagnoses and

9. identifies cultural issues that may require additional
exploration. Outlines how the cultural factors influence
treatment options supported by appropriate research literature.
Associated Learning Objectives
MAFP_PO1_Psychological Theory & PracticeAssessment
Method: Score on Criteria - C1 Principal & Secondary
Diagnosis (PO1).Required Performance: Level 3 Proficient
MAFP_PO1_Psychological Theory & PracticeAssessment
Method: Score on Criteria - C2 Etiology of Diagnoses
(PO1).Required Performance: Level 3 Proficient
MAFP_PO1_Psychological Theory & PracticeAssessment
Method: Score on Criteria - C3 Therapeutic Modality
(PO1).Required Performance: Level 3 Proficient
MAFP_PO1_Psychological Theory & PracticeAssessment
Method: Score on Criteria - C5 Differential Diagnosis
(PO1).Required Performance: Level 3 Proficient
MAFP_PO1_Psychological Theory & PracticeAssessment
Method: Score on Criteria - C4 Therapeutic Modality Txt
Application (PO1).Required Performance: Level 3 Proficient
MAFP_PO5_Multicultural CompetenceAssessment
Method: Score on Criteria - C6 Cultural Factors
(PO5).Required Performance: Level 3 Proficient