DSN 2700 Introduction to Design Processes and Practices Department of Design Mary Anne Beecher, Ph.D. Michael Kellner, Ph. D. Spring Semester, 2017 ASSIGNMENT 02: You Ate What? Due: February 24, 2017 Objectives 1. Articulate the relationship between cultural context and design innovation and expression; 2. Research designers from historic periods and familiarize yourself with their signature works; 3. Use the structure of comparison to highlight the similarities and differences between two different types of designed products (buildings, products, graphics and services and systems); 4. Articulate the relationship between cultural context and design innovation and expression; 5. Practice your editing! Convey details in a concise and well-structured story. Assignment: Understanding more about the people who have contributed to the establishment of the design disciplines is an important step toward being knowledgeable about design processes and practices. And as design practices have become more actively entwined with people in general, using well-told stories to communicate messages has become a critical design skill. Use this opportunity to learn about two designers by comparing one to another and demonstrate your awareness of how some particular aspect of their design process or a well- known design project for which they have been credited can be explained through an imaginative story you create. In this spirit, imagine that you take two of the designers you have investigated to lunch. Describe where the lunch occurs…what would make sense, given the personalities involved? What would they eat? Include an image of a significant design associated with each of the designers in your essay and use references to it to inform your creative decisions about the plot. In your story, one of the designers should engage the other by one of the following three ways: 1. Telling him/her about how his/her work has been a positive influence on the younger designer (and why); 2. Making the point that times have changed, and that new times require exciting new approaches to design (and why); 3. Making the point that what is new can never live up to the quality of what was done in the past (and why). Context for your story should be the most critical cultural factors such as wars or other types of life- altering political events, advancements in science, engineering or manufacturing, and/or key evolutions in cultural expression (art, music, literature, etc.). Be sure to provide a reference list for any sources you use to support the information your story provides, including sources for the images. Choose your two designers from the list below. Because this story is a work of fiction, the two designers do not have to have lived in the same place or at the same time. Anything is possible! Due A 1500 word essay that expresses, in your own words, a story about two designers who meet.

1. DSN 2700 Introduction to Design Processes and
Practices
Department of Design
Mary Anne Beecher, Ph.D.
Michael Kellner, Ph. D.
Spring Semester, 2017
ASSIGNMENT 02: You Ate What? Due:
February 24, 2017
Objectives
1. Articulate the relationship between cultural context
and design innovation and
expression;
2. Research designers from historic periods and
familiarize yourself with their signature
works;
3. Use the structure of comparison to highlight
the similarities and differences between
two different types of designed products (buildings,
products, graphics and services and
systems);
4. Articulate the relationship between cultural context
and design innovation and
expression;
5. Practice your editing! Convey details in a

2. concise and well-structured story.
Assignment:
Understanding more about the people who have
contributed to the establishment of the design
disciplines is an important step toward being
knowledgeable about design processes and
practices. And as design practices have become more
actively entwined with people in general,
using well-told stories to communicate messages
has become a critical design skill.
Use this opportunity to learnabout two designers by
comparing one to another and
demonstrate your awareness of how someparticular aspect
of their design process or a well-
known design project for which they have been
credited can be explained through an
imaginative storyyou create. In this spirit,
imagine that you take two of the designers you
have
investigated to lunch. Describe where the lunch
occurs…what would make sense, given
the
personalities involved? What would they eat? Include
an image of a significant design
associated
with each of the designers in your essay and use
referencesto it to inform your creative
decisions about the plot.
In your story, one of the designers should
engage the otherby one of the following three
ways:

3. 1. Telling him/her about how his/her work has been a
positive influence on the younger
designer (and why);
2. Making the pointthat times have changed, and that
new times require exciting new
approaches to design (and why);
3. Making the pointthat what is new can never live up
to the quality of what was done in
the past (and why).
Context for your storyshould be the most critical
cultural factors such as wars or othertypes of
life- altering political events, advancements in
science, engineering or manufacturing, and/or
key evolutions in cultural expression (art, music,
literature, etc.).Be sure to provide a reference
list for any sources you use to support the
information your storyprovides, including sources
for
the images.
Choose your two designers from the list below.
Because this storyis a work of fiction, the
two
designers do not have to have livedin the same place
or at the same time.Anything is possible!
Due

4. A 1500 word essay that expresses,in your own words,
a storyabout two designers who meet
and converse about their work in a brief but
entertaining conversation. Yourstoryshould be
presented as a double-spaced pdf, deposited in Carmen
prior to the start of class on 2/24/17.
No hard copy of this assignment is required.
Evaluation Criteria
Comparison of designers’works is articulate and
imaginative
10 points
Background information contextualizes key points
4
points
Ability of image to illustrate critical comparative
point 3 points
Format and citations are correct and complete
3 points
DESIGNERS
Spatial Design/Architecture
Antoni Gaudi (1852- 1926) Spain
Le Corbusier (1887- 1965) Switzerland
Frank Lloyd Wright (1867- 1959) USA
Walter Adolph Gropius (1883-1969) Germany
Charles Rennie Mackintosh (1868-1928) UK
Ludwig Mies Van der Rohe(1883-1969) Germany
Buckminster Fuller (1895-1983) USA
Eileen Gray (1878-1976) Ireland
Lucien Kroll (1927-) Belgium
Charles Correa (1930-) India
Arata Isozaki (1931-) Japan

5. PeterEisenman (1932-) USA
Norman Foster (1935-) UK
Renzo Piano (1937-) Italian
Charles Jenks (1939-) USA
Tadao Ando (1941-) Japan
Frank Gehry (1941-) Canada
Samuel Mockbee (1944- 2001) USA
Jean Nouvel (1945-) France
PeterZumthor (1946-) Switzerland
Daniel Libeskind (1946-) Poland
Li Xiaodong (1955- ) China
Zaha Hadid (1950-2016) Iraq
Cameron Sinclair (1973-) UK
Visual Communication Design
Alexey Brodovitch (1898-1971) Russia
Herbert Bayer (1900- 1985) Austria/USA
Paul Rand(1914-1996) USA
Herb Lubalin (1918- 1981) USA
Lou Dorsfman (1918- 2008) USA
Armin Hoffman (1920-) Switzerland
Saul Bass (1920-1996) USA
Milton Glaser (1929-) USA John Massey (1931-)
USA
Massimo Vignelli (1931-2014) Italy
Ivan Chermayeff (1932- ) UK
Steff Geisbuhler (1942-) Switzerland
Wolfgang Weingart (1941-) Germany
Wim Crouwel (1947-) Dutch
Paula Scher (1948-) USA
William Drentell (1953 -) USA
David Carson (1954 -) USA
Tim Brown (1958- ) UK

6. Kenya Hara (1958- ) Japan
Irma Boom (1960-) Netherlands
Stefan Sagmeister (1962- ) Austria
Ellen Lupton (1963-) USA
Neville Brody (1967-) UK
Fanette Mallier (1977-) France
Industrial Design
Ferdinand Porsche (1875-1951) Germany
Walter Dorwin Teague (1883-1960) USA
Norman Bel Geddes (1893-1958)
Raymond Loewy (1893-1986) USA
Donald Deskey (1893-1989) USA
Arne Jacobsen ( 1902-1971) Denmark
Henry Dreyfuss (1904-1972) USA
Viktor Schreckengost (1906-2008)
Charles Eames (1907-1978) + Ray Eames (1912-
1988) USA
George Nelson (1908-1986) USA
Hans Jørgensen Wegner (1914-2007) Denmark
Florence Knoll (1917-) USA
Verner Panton (1926-1998) Denmark
Sergio Pininfarina (1926-2012) Italy
Niels Diffrient (1928-2013) USA
Dieter Rams (1932-) Germany
Syd Mead (1933-) USA
Luigi Colani (1928-) Germany
Michael Graves (1934-2015) USA
Mario Bellini (1935-) Italy
James Dyson (1947-) UK
Philippe Starck (1949 France
David Kelley (1951-) USA
Ross Lovegrove (1958-) UK

7. Ken Okuyama (1959-) Japan
Karim Rashid (1960-) Egypt
Jonathan Ive (1967-) USA
Yves Behar (1967-) Switzerland
December 2011
MARION COUNTY JAIL STUDY
MARION COUNTY JAIL STUDY (SALEM,
OREGON (2011)
The following slides are drawn from a survey of
the Marion County Jail in Salem, Oregon that was
conducted in December 2011.
Every prisoner, on the day the survey was conducted,
was given an opportunity to participate in the survey.
Over 89% of the participants agreed to participate
(467), which included 401 male and 66 female
prisoners.
ANALYSIS PROJECT INSTRUCTIONS
You must select at least 5 of the following topics to
complete your analysis project
paper assignment. Your paper can be no longer than 8
typed (double--spaced)
pages. Page one must include your name and the five

8. selected topics. Each
page must be numbered. Submit ONLY in WORD format.
No other formats will
Be accepted.
Topics:
1. Race 2. Employment 3. Permanent Residency
4. Sex 5. Alcohol/Drugs 6. Mental Health
7. Families 8. Criminal History 9. Education
Additional Expectations:
You will be expected to incorporate/include other variables
presented in this
PowerPoint as you discuss each of your 5 selected topics.
ANALYSIS PAPER INSTRUCTIONS
1. After reviewing the data contained in this presentation,
select
5 specific topics – You may use other topics to expand
your discussion,
but remember to focus primarily on only 5 topics.
2. Provide an analysis of the data provided. Be very
specific in your analysis.
Describe the data, what do these data mean to you, and
what they mean to
the study of corrections.
3. What are the implications of these data to policies
related to corrections?

9. 4. Based on these data, what suggestions do you have for
using the data to
“educate” those who “operate” corrections facilities?
5. Your analysis paper must be NO MORE than 8 pages
(double--spaced).
6. Your analysis paper must be submitted in WORD format
(as an attachment)
NO LATER THAN FEBRUARY 24, 2017 prior to 11:55
PM.
AGE
Age Group Count Percent
15-18 4 0.86
19-22 71 15.20
23-26 53 11.35
27-30 80 17.13
31-34 66 14.13
35-38 50 10.71
39-42 55 11.78
43-46 33 7.07
47-50 30 6.42
51-54 15 3.21
55-58 8 1.71
Over 58 2 0.43
RACE
Race Count Percent
American Indian 52 11.13

10. African American 34 7.28
Asian 9 1.93
Latino/Hispanic 88 18.84
Latino/Indigena 5 1.07
White 266 56.96
Mixed Race 13 2.78
MARITAL STATUS
Marital Status Count Percent
Married 90 19.27
Single 180 38.54
Divorced 69 14.78
Separated 35 7.49
Widow/Widowe
r 9 1.93
Partner/Live
Together 84 17.99
EDUCATION
Completed Education
Years Count Percent
8 Years or Less
Education 48 10.28
9-11 years Education 181 38.76
12 Years Education 135 28.91

11. 1 Year College 53 11.35
2 Years College 35 7.49
3 or More Years
College 15 3.21
EDUCATION
High School
Graduate Count Percent
Yes 147 31.48
No 320 68.52
EDUCATION
Reasons No High
School Diploma Count Percent
Went to Work 110 34.38
Pregnancy 8 2.50
Arrested 33 10.31
Not Enough Credits 80 25.00
Failed 5 1.56
Just Quit 74 23.13
Other 10 3.13
EMPLOYMENT: EMPLOYED PRIOR TO MOST RECENT
ARREST
Employed
Prior to Arrest Count Percent
Yes 201 43.04

12. No 266 56.96
EMPLOYMENT STABILITY: WAS EMPLOYMENT STEADY
PRIOR
TO MOST RECENT ARREST
Steady Job Count Percent
Yes 121 60.20
No 80 39.80
DURATION OF LAST EMPLOYMENT PRIOR TO
MOST RECENT ARREST
Length of Employment Count Percent
Less than 6 Months 50 24.88
6 Months – Less than 1 Yr 34 16.92
1 Yr – Less than 2 Yrs 43 21.40
2 Yrs – Less than 3 Yrs 20 9.95
3 Yrs – Less than 5 Yrs 29 14.42
5 or More Years 25 12.43
EMPLOYMENT CLASSIFICATION PRIOR TO MOST
RECENT ARREST
Employment
Classification Count Percent
Service 33 16.41
Laborer 74 36.81

13. Sales 19 9.45
Construction 55 27.36
Office/Clerical 1 0.49
Technical (Includes
Computer) 6 2.98
Agriculture 11 5.47
Other 2 0.09
INCOME FROM EMPLOYMENT PRIOR TO MOST
RECENT ARREST
Monthly Income Count Percent
$1 - $499 26 12.93
$500 - $1,000 47 23.38
$1,001 - $1,500 52 25.87
$1,501 - $2,000 38 18.90
$2,001 - $2,500 23 11.44
$2,501 - $3,000 12 5.97
More than $3,000
Per Month 3 1.49
EMPLOYMENT FOLLOWING RELEASE FROM JAIL
Job After Release from Jail Count Percent
Yes 79 16.92
No 388 83.08
EMPLOYMENT STABILITY FOLLOWING
RELEASE FROM JAIL

14. Future Job Steady Count Percent
Yes 72 91.13
No 7 8.87
EMPLOYMENT CLASSIFICATION FOLLOWING
RELEASE FROM JAIL
Employment
Classification Count Percent
Service 13 16.45
Laborer 24 30.37
Sales 6 7.59
Construction 29 36.70
Agriculture 6 7.59
Other 1 1.26
ANTICIPATED INCOME FROM POST-RELEASE
EMPLOYMENT
Future Monthly
Income Count Percent
$1-$499 11 13.92
$500-$1,000 11 13.92
$1,001 - $1,500 24 30.37
$1,501 - $2,000 15 18.98
$2,001 - $2,500 14 17.72
$2,501 - $3,000 11 13.92
OREGON RESIDENT

15. Oregon
Resident Count Percent
Yes 453 97.00
No 14 3.00
LENGTH OF RESIDENCE PRIOR TO MOST
RECENT ARREST
Length of Residence Count Percent
Less than 6 Months 119 25.59
6 Months – 1 Yr 82 17.63
Over 1 Yr – Less than 2 Yrs 58 12.47
2 Yrs – Less than 3 Yrs 49 10.53
3 Yrs – Less than 5 Yrs 36 7.74
5 Yrs – Less than 10 Yrs 33 7.09
10 Yrs or Longer 88 18.92
DENIED RESIDENCE DUE TO CRIMINAL RECORD
Denied Place to Live
Criminal History Count Percent
Yes 244 52.25
No 223 47.75
EVER HAD A PERMANENT PLACE TO LIVE?
Had Permanent
Place to Live Count Percent
Yes 419 90.30

16. No 45 9.70
HAD A PERMANENT PLACE TO LIVE IMMEDIATELY
PRIOR TO RECENT ARREST ?
Had Permanent Place to Live
Prior to Arrest Count Percent
Yes 310 66.81
No 154 33.19
HAVE PERMANENT PLACE TO LIVE FOLLOWING
RELEASE
FROM JAIL?
Have Permanent Place to Live
After Release from Jail Count Percent
Yes 227 49.92
No 237 51.08
EVER EXPERIENCE BEING HOMELESS
Ever Homeless Count Percent
Yes 292 62.53
No 175 37.47
HOMELESS IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO RECENT
ARREST

17. Homeless Prior to
Arrest Count Percent
Yes 156 53.42
No 136 46.58
JUVENILE CRIMINAL HISTORY: EVER ARRESTED AS
A JUVENILE
Juvenile
Arrest Count Percent
Yes 223 47.75
No 244 52.25
JUVENILE CRIMINAL HISTORY: AGE WHEN FIRST
ARRESTED AS A JUVENILE
Age Count Percent
12 or Younger 57 25.56
13 Years Old 31 13.90
14 Years Old 23 10.31
15 Years Old 69 30.94
16 Years Old 32 14.35
17 Years Old 11 4.93
JUVENILE CRIMINAL HISTORY: EVER UNDER
JUVENILE SUPERVISION - PROBATION
Offense Count Percent
Status Offense 11 4.93
Property Offense 95 42.60

18. Person Offense 34 15.25
Drug Offense 44 17.93
Other Offense 39 17.49
JUVENILE CRIMINAL HISTORY: EVER UNDER
JUVENILE SUPERVISION - PROBATION
Juvenile
Supervision Count Percent
Yes 157 70.40
No 66 29.60
JUVENILE CRIMINAL HISTORY: EVER PLACED IN
JUVENILE DETENTION
Placed in Juvenile
Detention Count Percent
Yes 149 66.82
No 74 33.18
JUVENILE CRIMINAL HISTORY: EVER COMMITTED
TO OYA (OREGON YOUTH AUTHORITY)
Ever Committed to OYA Count Percent
Yes 64 28.70
No 159 71.30
JUVENILE CRIMINAL HISTORY: OFFENSE

19. RESULTING IN OYA COMMITMENT
OYA Offense Count Percent
Property 36 56.25
Person 16 25.00
Drugs 8 12.50
Other 4 6.25
IN JAIL WAITING FOR COURT
Waiting for Court Count Percent
Yes 226 48.39
No 241 51.61
CHARGE WAITING FOR COURT: MISDEMEANOR
Misdemeanor-Person Count Percent
Yes 28 12.39
No 198 87.61
Misdemeanor-Property Count Percent
Yes 16 7.08
No 210 92.92
Misdemeanor-Other Count Percent
Yes 46 20.35
No 180 79.65
CHARGE WAITING FOR COURT: FELONY

20. Felony-Person Count Percent
Yes 98 43.36
No 128 56.64
Felony-Property Count Percent
Yes 58 25.66
No 168 74.34
Drug Offense Count Percent
Yes 57 25.22
No 169 74.78
CHARGE WAITING FOR COURT: OTHER
PV (Probation/Parole
Violation) Count Percent
Yes 81 35.84
No 145 61.16
DUI Count Percent
Yes 12 5.31
No 214 94.69
SERVING SENTENCE IN JAIL OR PV
Serving Sentence or PV Count Percent
Yes 241 51.61
No 226 48.39
SERVING SENTENCE IN JAIL OR PV

21. Misdemeanor-Person Count Percent
Yes 42 17.43
No 199 82.57
Misdemeanor-Property Count Percent
Yes 26 10.79
No 215 89.21
Misdemeanor-Other Count Percent
Yes 54 22.41
No 187 77.59
SERVING SENTENCE IN JAIL OR PV
Drug Offense Count Percent
Yes 47 19.50
No 194 80.50
PV Count Percent
Yes 64 26.56
No 177 73.44
DUI Count Percent
Yes 48 19.92
No 193 80.08
LENGTH OF TIME SENTENCED TO JAIL
(CURRENT JAIL SENTENCE)
Days in Jail Count Percent
1-10 Days 7 2.90

22. 11-20 Days 4 1.66
21-30 Days 25 10.37
31-60 Days 32 13.28
61-90 Days 34 14.11
91-120 Days 30 12.45
121-180 Days 79 32.78
More than 180 Days 30 12.45
NUMBER OF TIMES IN JAIL
Times in Jail Count Percent
First Time 77 16.49
2-3 Times 132 28.27
4-5 Times 61 13.06
6-7 Times 41 8.78
8-9 Times 31 6.64
10 Times 39 8.35
More than 10 Times 86 18.42
NUMBER OF TIMES SENTENCED TO JAIL
Times Sentenced to
Jail Count Percent
None 148 31.69
One Time 90 19.27
2 Times 86 18.42
3 Times 32 6.85
4 Times 17 3.64
5 Times 29 6.21
More than 5 Times 65 13.92

23. TIMES IN JAIL DURING PAST 12 MONTHS
Times in Jail Past
12 Months Count Percent
One Time 233 49.89
2 Times 114 24.41
3 Times 54 11.56
4 Times 44 9.42
5 Times 14 3.00
More than 5 Times 8 1.71
PROBATION
Currently on Probation Count Percent
Yes 176 37.69
No 291 62.31
PROBATION
Have Probation Officer Count Percent
Yes 154 87.50
No 22 12.50
Probation Ever Revoked Count Percent
Yes 227 48.61
No 240 51.39
Why Probation Revoked Count Percent
Technical 126 55.51
New Offense 82 36.12
Other 19 8.37

24. POST-PRISON SUPERVISION
Currently on Post-Prison/Parole Count Percent
Yes 62 13.28
No 405 86.72
POST-PRISON SUPERVISION
Have Post-Supervision Officer Count Percent
Yes 59 95.16
No 3 4.84
Post-Prison Supervision Ever Revoked Count Percent
Yes 41 8.78
No 426 91.22
Reason Post-Prison Supervision Revoked Count Percent
Technical 17 42.86
New Offense 24 57.14
PRISON
Ever Serve Time in Prison Count Percent
Yes 168 35.97
No 299 64.03
PRISON

25. Number of Times in Prison Count Percent
One Time 69 41.07
Two Times 51 30.36
Three Times 20 11.90
More than Three Times 28 16.67
PRISON
Amount of Time Served in Prison Count Percent
Less Than 1 Year 4 2.38
1 Yr – Less than 2 Years 9 5.36
2 Years – Less than 3 Yrs 28 16.67
3 Yrs – Less than 4 Yrs 23 13.69
4 Yrs – Less than 5 Yrs 22 13.10
5 Yrs – Less than 6 Yrs 21 12.50
6 Yrs – Less than 7 Yrs 23 13.69
7 or More Years 38 22.62
PRISON
Age When First in Prison Count Percent
18-22 74 44.05
23-26 37 22.02
27-30 16 9.52
31-34 15 8.93
35-38 15 8.93
39-42 7 4.17
43 or Older 4 2.38

26. PRISON
Most Recent Release from Prison Count Percent
Less than 6 Months 17 10.12
6 Months – Less than 1 Year 37 22.02
1 Year – Less than 2 Years 16 9.52
2 Years – Less than 3 Years 22 13.10
3 Years – 5 Years 26 15.48
5 Years or Longer Ago 37 22.02
FIRST PRIMARY PRISON CONVICTION OFFENSE
Felony Person Count Percent
Yes 79 47.02
No 89 52.98
Felony Property Count Percent
Yes 58 34.52
No 110 65.48
Drug Offense Count Percent
Yes 64 38.10
No 104 61.90
FIRST PRIMARY PRISON CONVICTION OFFENSE
DUI Count Percent
Yes 24 14.29
No 144 85.71
Other Count Percent
Yes 3 1.79

27. No 165 98.21
PARTICIPATION IN PRISON PROGRAMS
Ever Participate in prison programs Count Percent
Yes 141 83.93
No 27 16.07
Resume Building Count Percent
Yes 45 31.91
No 96 68.09
Job Searching Count Percent
Yes 48 34.04
No 93 65.96
PARTICIPATION IN PRISON PROGRAMS
Parenting Programs Count Percent
Yes 52 36.88
No 89 63.12
Anger Management Count Percent
Yes 86 60.99
No 55 39.01
Drug Programs Count Percent
Yes 95 67.38
No 46 32.62

28. PARTICIPATION IN PRISON PROGRAMS
Alcohol Programs Count Percent
Yes 74 52.48
No 67 47.52
Other Programs Count Percent
Yes 46 32.62
No 95 67.38
MENTAL HEALTH
Apply Mental Health
Services Count Percent
Yes 133 28.48
No 334 71.52
Receive Mental Health
Services Count Percent
Yes 130 27.84
No 337 72.16
MENTAL HEALTH
Diagnosed Mental Health Count Percent
Yes 123 26.34
No 344 73.66
MENTAL HEALTH

29. How MH Related to Recent Arrest Count Percent
Assaultive Behavior 2 2.17
Aggressive Behavior 12 13.04
Desperation 27 29.35
Anger 8 8.70
Fear 4 4.34
Depression 15 16.30
Confusion 13 14.13
Self-Medication 4 4.34
Lack of Self Control 4 4.34
Addiction 3 3.26
MENTAL HEALTH
How MH Related to Recent Arrest Count Percent
Assaultive Behavior 2 2.17
Aggressive Behavior 12 13.04
Desperation 27 29.35
Anger 8 8.70
Fear 4 4.34
Depression 15 16.30
Confusion 13 14.13
ALCOHOL
Ever had a Problem with Alcohol Count Percent
Yes 292 62.53
No 175 37.47
Age First Started Using Alcohol Count Percent
15 Years and Under 233 49.89
16-18 Years of Age 173 37.04

30. 19-21 Years of Age 43 9.21
Never Drank Alcohol 18 3.85
ALCOHOL
Have Current Problem with Alcohol Count Percent
Yes 114 24.41
No 353 75.59
Arrested Because of Problem with
Alcohol Count Percent
Yes 232 49.68
No 235 50.32
Ever Attend Treatment Count Percent
Yes 228 48.82
No 239 51.18
Illegal drugs – excluding methamphetamine
Ever had Problem with Illegal Drug Use Count Percent
Yes 229 49.04
No 238 50.96
Age First Started Using Illegal Drugs Count Percent
15 Years and Under 139 51.48
16-18 Years of Age 95 35.19
19-21 Years of Age 31 11.48
Over 21 Years of Age 5 1.85
Illegal drugs – excluding methamphetamine

31. Have Current Problem with Illegal Drugs Count Percent
Yes 103 22.06
No 364 77.94
Ever Attend Drug Treatment Count Percent
Yes 163 34.90
No 304 65.10
Was the Drug Treatment Successful Count Percent
Yes 119 73.01
No 44 26.99
METHAMPHETAMINE
Ever Use Methamphetamine Count Percent
Yes 297 63.60
No 170 36.40
Age First Used Meth Count Percent
15 Years and Under 29 9.76
16-18 Years of Age 104 35.02
19-21 Years of Age 116 39.06
22-25 Years of Age 16 5.39
26 Years of Age and Over 32 10.77
METHAMPHETAMINE
Had Problem w/ Meth Just Prior to Arrest Count Percent
Yes 169 56.90
No 128 43.10

32. Ever Attend Meth Treatment Count Percent
Yes 124 41.75
No 173 58.25
Was the Meth Treatment Successful Count Percent
Yes 73 58.87
No 51 41.13
HEROIN
Ever Used Heroin Count Percent
Yes 106 22.70
No 361 77.30
Ever Attend Heroin-Specific Program Count Percent
Yes 19 17.92
No 87 82.08
Heroin Directly or Indirectly Related
to Recent Arrest
Count Percent
Yes 22 20.75
No 84 79.25
YOUTH GANGS
Ever Been Involved with a Youth Gang Count Percent
Yes 92 19.70
No 375 80.30

33. Family Members Ever Been Involved with
a Youth Gang
Count Percent
Yes 75 16.06
No 392 83.94
CHILDREN
Do You Have Children Count Percent
Yes 270 57.82
No 197 42.18
Has a Child Visited You in Jail Count Percent
Yes 56 20.74
No 214 79.26
MARION COUNTY JAIL STUDY (SALEM,
OREGON (2011)
On the day of the survey, more than 684 children
had a parent incarcerated in the Marion County
Jail.
Over the course of one year, parents incarcerated
in the Marion County Jail will affect
approximately 13,000 - 16,000 children.
MILITARY SERVICE

34. Serve in the Military Count Percent
Yes 46 9.85
No 421 90.15
Ever Deployed to Combat Area Count Percent
Yes 33 71.74
No 13 28.26
Receive Honorable Discharge Count Percent
Yes 41 89.13
No 5 10.87