Essay format essay format outline· paragraph 1 intro

1. ESSAY FORMAT
ESSAY FORMAT OUTLINE
· PARAGRAPH 1
Introduction----- Very brief outline of the essay------------------
--------------------- about Intersectionality and
Marginalized/BIPOC people challenges and Critical Race
Theory. Talk about Intersectionality and Marginalized /BIPOC
people challenges and Critical Race Theory.
· PARAGRAPH 2
Political intersectionality
Representational intersectionality
Apply one type to any one example from BIPOC people
experience/book and the other type to one example from the
film Highway of Tears (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-
cuUfP9XtM).
In so doing, you will show how single-axis analysis limits the
voices of Indigenous people who are multiply marginalized.
And show how Black women can be used as a model for
applying intersectionality to Indigenous peoples who are
multiply marginalized. In applying the two types of
intersectionality, be sure you fully communicate your
understanding of each one.
· PARAGRAPH 3
CRITICAL RACE THEORY (CRT)
BIPOC have unique and valuable perspectives.
Counter-narratives and legal storytelling are important tools.
Apply one tenet to any one example of BIPOC book/experience
different to the example in paragraph 2 Next, apply the other

2. tenet to one example from the film nîpawistamâsowin: We Will
Stand Up
(https://uwinnipeg.on.worldcat.org/oclc/1155871615).
Be sure you fully communicate what Critical Race Theorists
mean by each of the two tenets you have chosen.
· PARAGRAPH 4
Cultural Racism
Drawing on two examples from BIPOC experience/book
(different to the examples in paragraphs 2 and 3 and taken from
chapters/book you have not yet cited), use the frame you
selected to explain how people can espouse racist ideologies
about Indigenous peoples without seeing themselves as racist.
· CHAPTER 5
The function of the conclusion is to draw together the main
ideas discussed in the body of the essay. Begin by re-stating or
re-emphasizing your position on the topic, then summarize your
line of argument and key points.
Rubic_Print_FormatCourse CodeClass CodeAssignment
TitleTotal PointsNRS-433VNRS-433V-O501PICOT Question
and Literature Search120.0CriteriaPercentage1: Unsatisfactory
(0.00%)2: Less Than Satisfactory (75.00%)3: Satisfactory
(83.00%)4: Good (94.00%)5: Excellent
(100.00%)CommentsPoints EarnedContent80.0%Summary of
Clinical Issue5.0%A clinical issue is omitted or is not relevant
to nursing practice.A clinical issue is partially presented. It is
unclear how the clinical issue relates to nursing practice.
Significant aspects are missing, or there are inaccuracies.A
clinical issue is summarized. The issue generally relates to
nursing practice.A clinical issue is presented. The issue relates
to nursing practice. Minor detail is needed for clarity.A clinical
issue is thoroughly described. The issue relates to nursing

3. practice.PICOT Question10.0%A PICOT question is not
included.A PICOT question is provided but is incomplete. The
PICOT question format is used incorrectly.A PICOT question is
provided. The PICOT question format is generally applied.
Some information or revision is needed.A PICOT question is
provided. The PICOT question format is applied accurately.
Some detail is need for support or clarity.A PICOT question is
clearly presented. The PICOT question format is applied
accurately and presents an answerable and researchable
question.APA-Formatted Article Citations With
Permalinks5.0%Article citations and permalinks are
omitted.Article citations and permalinks are presented. There
are significant errors in the APA format. One or more links do
not lead to the intended article.Article citations and permalinks
are presented. Article citations are presented in APA format, but
there are errors.Article citations and permalinks are presented.
Article citations are presented in APA format. There are minor
errors.Article citations and permalinks are presented. Article
citations are accurately presented in APA format.Relationship
of Articles to the PICOT Question10.0%Three or more articles
do not relate to the PICOT question.At least two articles do not
relate to the PICOT question. The remaining articles provide a
small degree of support for the PICOT question. Different
articles are needed to provide better support for the PICOT
question.At least one articles does not relate to the PICOT
question. The remaining articles provide general support for the
PICOT question. One or two different articles are needed to
provide better support for the PICOT question.Each article
relates to the PICOT question. The articles provide support for
the PICOT question.Each article clearly relates to the PICOT
question. The articles provide strong support for the PICOT
question.Quantitative and Qualitative Articles10.0%Fewer than
six research articles are presented. Four or more articles do not
meet the assignment criteria for a quantitative, qualitative,Six
research articles are presented. Three articles do not meet the
assignment criteria for a quantitative, qualitativeSix research

4. articles are presented. Two articles do not meet the assignment
criteria for a quantitative, qualitative, or mixed study. Some
ability to identify the type of research design used in a study is
demonstrated.Six research articles are presented. One article
does not meet the assignment criteria for a quantitative,
qualitative, or mixed study. A general ability to identify the
type of research design used in a study is demonstrated.Six
research articles are presented. Each article meets the
assignment criteria for a quantitative, qualitative, or mixed
study. An ability to identify the different types of research
design used in a study is consistently demonstrated.Purpose
Statements5.0%Purpose statements are omitted or are
incomplete overall.Purpose statements are referenced but are
incomplete in some areas.Purpose statements are presented.
There are minor omissions in some areas, or major
inaccuracies.Purpose statements summarized. There are some
minor inaccuracies in some.Purpose statements are accurate and
clearly summarized.Research Questions5.0%Research questions
are omitted or are incomplete overall.Research question is
presented for each article. The research question has been
misidentified or misinterpreted for at least two of the articles.
Additional information is needed to fully illustrate the research
question for several of the articles.Research questions are
presented. The research question has been misidentified or
misinterpreted for one of the articles. Some detail is needed to
fully illustrate the research question for one or two
articles.Research questions are presented. Minor detail is
needed for clarity in some areas.Research questions are accurate
and capture the fundamental question posed by the researchers
in each study.Outcome5.0%Research outcomes are omitted or
are incomplete overall.Research outcome is presented for each
article. The research outcome has been misidentified or
misinterpreted for at least two of the articles. Additional
information is needed to fully illustrate the research outcomes
for several of the articles.Research outcomes are presented. The
research outcome has been misidentified or misinterpreted for

5. one of the articles. Some detail is needed to fully illustrate the
research outcomes for one or two articles.Research outcomes
are presented. Minor detail is needed for clarity in some
areas.Research outcomes are accurate and described in detail for
each article.Setting5.0%The setting is omitted for one or more
of the articles. The setting described for three or more articles
is inaccurate or incomplete.The setting is indicated for each
article. The setting described for two of the articles is
inaccurate or incomplete.The setting is indicated for each
article. The setting described for one article is inaccurate or
incomplete.The setting is indicated for each article. Some detail
is needed to fully illustrate the physical, social, or cultural site
in which the researcher conducted the study.The setting in
which the researcher conducted the study is detailed and
accurate for each article.Sample5.0%The sample is omitted for
one or more of the articles. The sample described for three or
more articles is inaccurate or incomplete.The sample is
indicated for each article. The sample described for at least two
of the articles is inaccurate or incomplete.The sample is
indicated for each article. The sample described for one article
is inaccurate or incomplete.The sample is indicated for each
article. Minor detail is needed for accuracy.The sample is
indicated and accurate for each article.Method5.0%Method of
study for one or more articles is omitted. Overall, the methods
of study are incomplete.The method of study is partially
presented for each article. Key information is consistently
omitted. Overall, the methods reported contain inaccuracies.The
method of study for each article is presented. Some key aspects
are missing for one or two articles, or there are some
inaccuracies for the methods reported.A discussion on the
method of study for each article is presented.A thorough
discussion on the method of study for each article is
presented.Key Findings of the Study5.0%Discussion of study
results, including findings and implications for nursing practice,
is incomplete.A summary of the study results includes findings
and implications for nursing practice but lacks relevant details

6. and explanation. There are some omissions or
inaccuracies.Discussion of study results, including findings and
implications for nursing practice, is generally presented for
each article. Overall, the discussion includes some relevant
details and explanation.Discussion of study results, including
findings and implications for nursing practice, is complete and
includes relevant details and explanation.Discussion of study
results, including findings and implications for nursing practice,
is thorough with relevant details and extensive
explanation.Recommendations of the Researcher5.0%Researcher
recommendations are omitted for one or more of the articles.
The recommendations described for three or more articles are
inaccurate or incomplete.Researcher recommendations are
indicated for each article. The researcher recommendations
described for two of the articles are inaccurate or
incomplete.Researcher recommendations for each article are
presented. Researcher recommendations described for one
article are inaccurate or incomplete.Researcher
recommendations for each article are accurately presented.
Minor detail is needed for accuracy.Researcher
recommendations accurate are thoroughly described for each
article.Organization and Effectiveness10.0%Mechanics of
Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language
use)10.0%Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or
sentence construction is used.Frequent and repetitive
mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in
language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice
are present.Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but
they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence
structure and audience-appropriate language are used.Prose is
largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be
present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of
speech are used.Writer is clearly in command of standard,
written, academic English.Format10.0%Documentation of
Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as

7. appropriate to assignment and style)10.0%Sources are not
documented.Documentation of sources is inconsistent or
incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous
formatting errors.Sources are documented, as appropriate to
assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be
present.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment
and style, and format is mostly correct.Sources are completely
and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, and format is free of error.Total Weightage100%
Literature Evaluation Table
Student Name:
Summary of Clinical Issue (200-250 words):
PICOT Question:
Criteria
Article 1
Article 2
Article 3
APA-Formatted Article Citation with Permalink
How Does the Article Relate to the PICOT Question?
Quantitative, Qualitative (How do you know?)
Purpose Statement

8. Research Question
Outcome
Setting
(Where did the study take place?)
Sample
Method
Key Findings of the Study
Recommendations of the Researcher
Criteria
Article 4
Article 5

9. Article 6
APA-Formatted Article Citation with Permalink
How Does the Article Relate to the PICOT Question?
Quantitative, Qualitative (How do you know?)
Purpose Statement
Research Question
Outcome
Setting
(Where did the study take place?)
Sample
Method

10. Key Findings of the Study
Recommendations of the Researcher
© 2019. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
2