Deontological Ethics Kant

Deontological Ethics Kant
Deontological Ethics and Immanuel Kant Kant's theory of ethics was named deontological theory by Jeremy Bentham. Immanuel Kant was a
German philosopher in 18th century. Kant is a father of the modern philosophy. He believed that all philosophers should address two main
questions. First one is "What can I know?" Second is, "What should I do?" Personal autonomy what restricted by Moral Law is a base of Kant's
ethical theory. Kant was influenced by the Stoics and as a result his theory focused on what is right thing to do. Sometimes right things are valuable
by this theory because we all have duties and obligations between each other according to Kant. All actions should be done with good will, moral
duty and maximus. Good will means always do what is right. Moral duty is behavior what everyone respects and it applies to everyone, everywhere
and always. Maximus is a reason for any action. To find out what is a right thing to do, Kant used a two–step verification system through first and
second version of Categorical Imperative. Everything that passes both systems is right to do. Basically, for the first form person should form maximus
and universalize it. For a second form, person needs to check that everyone was treated with respect to their autonomy.... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
By this theory everyone has personal autonomy and all people are equally important. For example, you cannot kill one person because it will lead
to happiness of thousand people and angry mob want to do it. Additionally, consequences are not very important if you are doing the right thing. For
example, if doctor tried to save someone's life and he failed it does not mean that he needs to be judged as a "killer." Also, this theory has good
verification system of what is right and wrong. Finally, all people are equal and should be treated with respect and cannot be used by
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Kant, Categorical Imperative, And The Deontological Argument
Immanuel Kant, the Categorical Imperative, and the Deontological Argument Kant describes the categorical imperative as a universal law, one that is
formed from a collective agreement. That agreement is further clarified by Kant; "I ought never to act except in such a way that I can also will that
my maxim should become universal law." Basically, we should not do something to others that we do not want done on ourselves. Through this idea,
we can evaluate questions like "Is it ever acceptable to tell a lie?" I will argue that it is indeed acceptable to tell lies within certain circumstances, and
that Kant's deontological argument holds many exceptions. Before I start the exploring into our question, I first want to talk about Kant's ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Recall that Kant defines the categorical imperative as "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." (A bible quote, I believe). Let's put
ourselves in the shoes of the person asking the question. If we asked the question with honesty, seeking the truth, then the person answering should
answer truthfully. However, you can also ask the question in a rhetorical way (teenagers do it all the time). In this situation, what the person wants is
not the truth, but rather a playful response, and since we should be treating others the same way we would want to be treated, we would go along and
be playful in this context of the question. The point is, the one question, "Does this dress make me look fat?", isn't necessarily limited to a single
circumstance. I only gave two possible contexts of which the question may appear, but there can easily be indefinite amounts of possible contexts, and
this applies to any question/situation. Another instance where lying is universal exists within the situation we all know as "job interviews." And it's
not just the interviewee, the interviewer tends to lie as well. The interview lie is so common that it might as well be a universal law (categorical
imperative, anyone?). Before I continue, here's a disclaimer. I want to clarify that the "interview lie" is just a truth stretched to such extent that it
become misleading and strays away

Ethical Theories And Deontological Moral Theories
Adam Allred
Philosophy 1000
Dr. Richard Greene
Term Paper In this paper I will address the questions of what are consequentialist moral theories and deontological moral theories. I will also gear my
attention to the best known theorist for both respected parties. After doing that, I will show the key difference in consequentialist and deontological
overall theories. Furthermore, I will also give my opinion on which theorist and theory I feel most compelled to side with.
I will first introduce you to the idea of normative ethics, both consequentialist and deontological are branches of this. The idea of normative ethics is
to show us how a person should behave, and also the moral values that we should have. The overall goal of normative ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
So for example, if my intention or motive was good then the consequences do not change that it was moral. On the other hand, if I have bad intentions
or motives than no matter the outcome it would be demend immoral. The most recognized theorist of this view was Immanuel Kant, we will go over his
work in more detail later in this paper.
The next thing I will address is the key difference in consequentialist and Deontologists. I will not give my opinion on what I feel is best yet, but
rather give a closer look at what makes them so different. The key difference of the two is how you are told to judge the outcome of morality.
Consequentialist as I have stated earlier judge actions on the consequences of the action to be able to see if it is considered moral. Deontologists as
I have also stated earlier judge the action by the overall intent or motive to see if it is moral. So the real difference is that both use a different view
point of an action to try to decipher if it 's moral. Both try to give us some moral principles to use to judge what is moral and immoral. But that is the
only thing they share, other than that they could not be more of polar opposites.
John Stuart Mill was a British philosopher, he is a consequentialist moral theorist. But that being said, he is best known as a Utilitarian which is a
species of consequentialism. Utilitarianism is based on The Principles of Utility, which say an action is deemed right if it produces

Deontological Theories Of Kant Vs. Aristotle
Kant vs. AristotleHuman beings constantly ask questions regarding the nature of morality. In this process of prescriptive inquiry, they invoke specific
ethical theories to explain the concept of right or wrong. The reason is that morality is concerned with the question of good or bad of an action. When
determining the morality of actions, there are two principles of ethical philosophies that must be contrasted. These philosophies are teleological and
deontological theories of ethics. While teleological ethics concentrates on the consequences of actions to achieve some sort of end, the deontological
theories assert that morality is an obligation thus cannot be reduced due to the creation of desirable outcomes. Given these distinctively opposite traits
of the two ethics, it is obvious that the methods of approaching moral theories are differs from each other. Kant and Aristotle developed theories that
are contradicting to each other, however, both of them gives us a reason to ask questions and seek answers. This essay will be analyzing main ideas of
two philosophers and comparing the theories introduced by them. Deontological ethics are described as duty–based theories since they are associated
with obeying the absolute moral rules. There are different deontological theories. Divine Command is deriving its set of rules from the God. For
instance, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
On the other hand, these theories are widely used in many aspects of everyday life. Many judicial decisions and school of jurisprudence are based on
these theories. As I mentioned before, an example of Dudley vs. Stephens was based on Utilitarianism. The main actors were released from prison
based on the doctrine of necessity. Namely, they were forced by circumstances to eat a cabin boy. Therefore, they acted in accordance with rule
"greatest good for the greatest

Kant Deontological Theory
Student Name: Veronica Ryan Student No: 20120035 Assignment: Kant Lecturer: Prof: Wamsley Due Date: 23 August 2013
____________________________________________________________________ Emmanuel Kant was an influential German Philosopher. He was
born in Konigsberg in Prussia to Protestant parents he lived from 1724 to 1804. Kant observed the world around him and observed that that every
culture religion and society has moral law whether they are obeyed or not. The Formula of Universal Law– Act only in accordance with that maxim
through which you can at the same time will that it become a universal law. The Formula of Humanity– Act so that you use humanity, whether in your
own person or that of another, always at the same... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
One's actions must be universal. The Universal law is that one should act on the maxim a law which can become a universal law in nature when
acceptable and sustainable. We know that lying and stealing is wrong. If everyone did this society would fail. Perfect duties are without
exceptions, but we understand that torture and suicide is always wrong. Suicide is always wrong if this was universalized society would fail. We
know that making False Promises that cannot be fulfilled, is always wrong if we cannot regard this as a universal law society would fail. Breaking
promises when it in my interest he states that this inconsistent and therefore cannot be a moral imperative. Imperfect duties is seeking the perfection
of our duties are contradictions to our will. We ought to be seeking to promote the happiness of others. We understand that this is not always
possible. He does not exclude pleasure in doing duty, but that pleasure should not be the guide to what one's duty is. What is duty? Kant says "Duty
is the necessity of acting from respect for the Law": Kant believes that duty should be crowned in the end with happiness. Obedience he says is a
maxim that is universally binding as a law to all rational beings. Treat humans as ends to themselves and should respect and never to treat others as a
means to an end but only as an end. This means that we should respect others, because every human possesses an intrinsic value. We are to consider
whether our

Deontological Approach
Ethics in the decision making process is a topic which is highly complex. One who wishes to investigate this topic will find an abundance of
theories and approaches relating to the ethical implications of the decision making process. Two of the more dominant approaches in the study of
ethical decision making are the utilitarian approach and the deontological approach. Many researchers have questioned which of these two
approaches offers the best means of achieving ethically sound decisions. In order to fully investigate which of these two approaches is superior, it is
necessary to first establish a definition of both approaches. Put simply, the utilitarian approach is characterized by the principle of doing the most
good for the greatest number of people (Bazerman & Moore, 2013). This principle may seem simple, but there are many facets to the utilitarian
approach which complicates its application in the decision making process. For example, from the utilitarian perspective one may assume that all
decisions should be weighed within a system of majority rule; however, this is not always the... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The utilitarian camp possesses little regard for the rights of individuals in contrast the deontological approach argues that all actions must consider
human rights (Bazerman & Moore, 2013). Some may argue that the deontological approach is based on emotion rather than the calculated reason of the
utilitarian approach. This is however not true. The ethical principles which guide the deontological approach must first be justified through reason.
Only then can one understand their ethical position on any matter. It can be said that the utilitarian approach is not an ethical approach at all because it
says nothing of the ethics of an action, only the value that is produced by an action. Therefore, in terms of ethical decision making the deontological
approach is preferable over the utilitarian

Deontological Morality
We might want to trust that everybody is thought to be equivalents, paying little heed to sexual orientation. Both guys and females have properties that
are vital commitments to our every day lives and to our general public or any general public. Men and ladies both assume parts in the public eye and
inside the home, yet these parts are thought to be altogether different. Men ladies still are not generally considered as equivalents, even nowadays.
Despite the fact that sex balance has made considerable progress in the previous couple of decades, regardless we have a mountain to move to
accomplish uniformity and stop sexual orientation predisposition
At the point when taking a gander at the activities of each sexual sex, it is anything but ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Nothing is immaculate except for through appropriate research some closeness can be accomplished. This paper clarifies the speculations in detail,
their great and terrible side and how every fits to the current issue. It is valid, however that if these hypotheses are just continued papers, no great can
come and individuals will continue perusing these and not attempt to execute them. For this to wind up a win, it is to a great degree indispensable that
somebody removes the examination from the papers and actualizes it. The paper likewise examines how the hypothesis of rights is nearly better when
contrasted with the other hypothesis however them two have their favorable circumstances and hindrances. Kant's perspectives on deontology have
likewise been shared to get an elevated view on the subject. At last, ladies strengthening and sex fairness are things that truly require some highlighting
these days. Somebody needs to leave their usual range of familiarity to settle the totally imbalanced

The Ethical Theories Of Ethical Subjectivism,...
Introduction Using The Philosopher's Way by John Chaffee, I will explain the ethical theories of ethical subjectivism, utilitarianism, and Deontological
ethics. Secondly, I will summarize the main points of my article and then act in response using the three ethical theories previously listed. I will also
explain which ethical theory best represents the article. Then, I will provide reasoning as to why stem–cell research is important; and lastly, I will offer
two open–ended questions. Defined Ethical Theories All the ethical theories are going to be defined using The Philosopher's Way by John Chaffee.
Chaffee defines ethical subjectivism as, "The view that the ultimate moral authority is the individual or the 'subject'" (386). Next,... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Meanwhile, other scientists have been working on "somatic nuclear transfer" which means the nucleus is taken out of a human egg and is substituted
with the nucleus of an adult cell. Scientists are looking to get pluripotent stem–cells from this experiment. Pluripotent stem–cells are ones that can grow
into many kinds of human tissues. Although there were some achievements using somatic nuclear transfer, it took many eggs. The author argues that
scientists should not be restricted from research that will significantly decrease human suffering and is "scientifically useful." Article Response I agree
with the author in regards to using stem–cell research to decrease human suffering. The idea that human suffering will be decreased is directly related
to utilitarianism. If utilitarianism is applied to stem–cell research, there would be no reason not to use embryos if it means that there is less suffering
for the greatest number of people. Stem–cell research would then, and only then, be considered ethical. The problem is determining if most people
would need stem–cells for medical issues. If only fifty percent of people find stem–cells useful, utilitarianism would not apply, therefore, the ethical
issues still stand. Opposed to utilitarianism, a subjectivist would argue that the individual decides whether something is ethical or not based on how
they feel. If a subjectivist found that using an embryo was ethical because it could potentially fix the

Analyzing Kant's Deontological Report
The displacement of Syrian's as a result of war is an issue that is extremely prevalent in today's society. It can be safely stated that the question of
whether or not to allow refugees into our country is an ethical one. There are many that would say that these refugees are a great responsibility and
bring with them, undeniable risks. To these people, I would say, that despite the possible dangers, we as humans are naturally altruistic and are
presented with undeniable philosophical reasoning regarding the importance of caring for distant others. This paper aims to convince society that we
have a global moral responsibility to help and care for all those whom we know are suffering, despite the fact that they are foreign to us. It will utilize
Kant's deontological discussion in Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, Sara Ruddick's Maternal Thinking, and Sarah Clark Miller's "Global
Needs and Care" to reinforce the concepts within the ethics of care. I. Kant's Deontological Ethics Kant says, "To be beneficent where one can is a
duty" (11). We can see the deontological roots of his theory here, as he believes that it is our obligation to help those in need without the result of
personal gain. Kant's central doctrine ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
She uses her own experiences as well as philosophical reasoning to analyze motherhood as a "practice". In Part I, she says that we, as people, are
shaped by our actions and what we do. She then includes mothers in this theory by identifying that the practice of mothering creates aspects of an
identity that would not be developed otherwise. Her main idea is that maternal thinking requires three things, to preserve the life of the child, to
promote the growth of the child and to socialize and culture the child (Ruddick, 17). Ruddick also universalizes the private practice of mothering and
compares it to the global practices of

Utilitarianism Theory: Nonconsequential View The...
While utilitarianism theory focuses on the consequential view the deontological theory of ethics is based around a nonconsequential approach to the
topic. According to deontological theory an act being morally right or wrong is due to something other than the consequences. Deontological ethics
requires people to do the right thing simply because it is the right thing to do – regardless of the consequences. Consequences can never be an adequate
justification for an act (Ferrell, Fraedrich, & Ferrell, 2013 p. 158–159). Fundamental to deontology theory is the idea that equal respect must be given
to all persons. Is the case study example a deontological approach should have been undertaken to promote employees within the organization. This was

Essay about Kant's Deontological Theory
Kant's Deontological Theory The existence of God is something that most people take for granted. In your upbringing you are taught that God is the
most supreme being, the creator of all, infinite and eternal. Taking into account the type of society in which we live in and the fact that it is usually
our parents who teach us about God, most people do not even question his existence. Many philosophers who believe in God have tried to prove his
existence using many different types of argument. One of these arguments is the ontological argument. It was made famous by the 11th century
philosopher Anselm. The ontological argument has three properties: 1. It is an a priori argument. 2. It treats existence as a property. 3. It is... Show more
Existence is one of the properties included in the concept of God, and if we reject that, then we are contradicting the idea of God. But Kant says
that this is not so. Existence is not a property of a thing. If we reject the existence of thing, we reject the thing itself with all its properties.
Therefore, there is no contradiction because there is nothing left to be contradicted. The defenders of the ontological argument have a comeback
though. They say that the person who rejects the existence of God has not grasped the concept of God correctly because existence is part of the
concept of God. In conclusion, the person does not understand what he is denying. But Kant comes back with an even stronger argument. As we
already know, existence is not a first order property, it just says that something is actually there. In Kant's own words, "'Being' is obviously not a real
predicate: that is, it is not a concept of something which could be added to the concept of a thing. It is merely the positing of a thing, or of certain
determinations, as existing in themselves." Kant's argument makes perfect sense. Let us use a triangle to prove his point. Say that right now I have the
concept of a triangle in my head. A triangle is a geometrical figure with three angles. Under the condition that I have the concept of the triangle in my
head, it necessarily follows that I must have the idea

Kant and Deontological Theory Essay
Kant and Deontological Theory
Immanuel Kant was a moral philosopher. His theory, better known as deontological theory, holds that intent, reason, rationality, and good will are
motivating factors in the ethical decision making process. The purpose of this paper is to describe and explain major elements of his theory, its
essential points, how it is used in the decision making process, and how it intersects with the teams values. While Kant's theory may seem "overly
optimistic" (Johnson, 2008) now, it was ruled as acceptable and rational behavior then. Kant believed that any moral or ethical decision could be
achieved with consistent behavior. While judgment was based on reason, morals were based on rational choices made by human... Show more content
The subject of good will for Kant is controversial. Kant believes that good will is not based on a reaction to the consequences, either negative or
positive, merely by the intention of which the act was made. When an action is done in good will, the reasoning is not emotional (Johnson, 2008).
It does not done out of sympathy or empathy for the individual, rather by a sense of duty. This is the controversial part because many believe that
while good will is based on positive intentions, the act is performed through a feeling of love for the fellow man. Kant believes that good will
focuses on all human beings regardless of feelings of love, friendship, bond, hatred, or lack of caring. This is why the best way to describe it is duty.
However, Kant was not implying that no other motivating factor fuels good will. He was simply stating that when there is a dilemma that has the
individual questioning the good will or morality of a decision that it is best to look at it from an unbiased view (Johnson, 2008). Removing emotional
attachment from the situation has already proven to be helpful in making rational decisions in an otherwise difficult moment. According to Kant,
imperatives are principles determining what individuals should do. These imperatives may be divided as those which are categorical, and those which
are hypothetical; the former expresses imperatives that are those

Deontological Argument Analysis
In the scenario that is given about a male drunk driver who crashes and kills two people in the back seat of the car, while driving home thought it
was safe. It is said that all his friends were drunker than he was and he thought it was the right thing to do. When he went on trial he defended himself
by saying "I was only trying to help." The main issue is whether your viewpoint is a deontological viewpoint or a teleological viewpoint and how these
viewpoints would argue this situation. Many would argue that he is wrong and he deserves a consequence and others may argue something different.
In a deontological viewpoint, many would argue that the action that is happening is coming from a good intention and it is duty–based. Since
deontology is duty–based people who view this think what he did the right thing even if what he did produce more harm than doing good. Deontology
follows values and what is morally correct. Someone who has... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
I can agree with viewpoint because I feel like if you think you are doing a good thing than your intentions were coming from a good will. Another
example of this could be if you are trying to help someone walk up the steps who is old and they fall, causing the end result to be bad, your actions
are still good. I also disagree with this viewpoint because I do not think his action was a good intention or was moral because he killed two people.
His mind was not in the right state of mind to make a good decision, I think if he was not drunk and killed two people I would view this differently.
The deontological viewpoint would say that the male motivation good and do not care about the consequences. They care that the act was moral and
you cannot control the consequences. They could argue that his actions were wrong, but they not see the outcome as

Deontological Ethics: Military Action
Scenario 3 – Military Action
Deontological Ethics With Deontological Ethics, good actions justify whatever happens without the thought of consequences. This mind set will
push my decision into not saving the villagers because I was given orders to return to the base. In this situation, I would follow orders and return to
base without the thought of breaking rules. I was given the command to return to base for a reason, maybe the commander has a plan at the base to
stop the enemy before they strike the next village. With the decision to return to base, all the villagers in the nearby village are killed and no
survivors were left. However, the next villages are saved due to a plan that was developed at the base and eliminated the enemy. The... Show more
For Deontological Ethics, the decision to return base was very different from the other two decisions because the ethics justifies an individual is to
follow rules and perform one's duties. Teleological ethics encourages rule breaking, if, it gives the most happiness in the greatest amount of people.
Going to save the villagers was a preferable idea to gain happiness from the surviving and villagers in nearby villages. Being courageous and saving the
village was also the decision made in the mind set of Virtue Ethics, where an individual act to be foreseen a "good"

Deontological And Duty-Based Ethical Theories
Deontological Ethics Ethical theories are the initiation of our ethical thinking and analysis. They are the perspectives from which we can obtain
guidance in order to reach an ethical decision. Deontological ethics is also known as 'duty–based' ethics as deontologists adhere to their obligations and
duties when evaluating ethical situations (Alavudeen, Kalil Rahman, Jayakumaran, 2008). In order to make the correct choices, we need to understand
what our moral duties are and what the correct rules exist to regulate these duties. The theory focuses on the rightness and wrongness of actions in
contrast to the rightness or wrongness of the consequences. We have the duty to do the right thing even if it produces a bad result. This therefore
compels... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Kant believed that a conflict of duties was 'inconceivable' (Kant, 1780, as cited by Alexander & Moore, 2015). If there is a conflict in our duties,
then we have misunderstood what one of our duties is asking of us and therefore we need to avoid our duties from conflicting in order to come to
absolute decisions (Johnson, 2014). John Stuart Mill (1806–1873) was a Utilitarian who argued that deontologists failed to state, which principles
would take priority when duties were in conflict. As a result, our rational thinking would forever be unresolvable if we cannot prioritize our principles
when there is a conflict of

Deontological Paper
MGMT 368 Business Ethics
Week 4 Deontological Second Paper
April 15, 2012
Direct–to–consumer drug advertising – Deontological Point ofView
For many years, consumers relied and depended on the expertise and knowledge of physicians to make decisions on their pharmaceutical needs. Before
1985, prescription drugs could not be advertised directly to consumers. The U.S Food and Drug Administration passed a rule that allowed
Direct–to–consumer drug advertising in 1985. This ruling was passed on the condition that warning information was provided about side effects and
other dangers. "Directto– consumer advertising is the promotion of prescription drugs through newspaper, magazine, television, and internet marketing.
Drug companies also ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
When the advertisements are viewed by patients,it encourages people to contact their doctor similar symptoms, it is the physician's duty to make a
accurate diagnosis and give a prescription only if it is needed. The physician's motive should be to treat the patient to the best of their ability with
effective medicines.
On the contrary, the argument would be that because the drugs have serious side effects that require a prescription, it should be up to physicians on
whether the medicines is best for the patient. "Broadcast advertising creates false impressions about effectiveness and downplays downplays possible
adverse effects. Such advertising leads to self–diagnosis." (DeGeorge
Richard ) Patients then pressure physician's for the acceptable, popular drugs, and physician's often give in to the pressure to satisfy them, even though
it is not a well–informed choice.
"Seeing the ads on TV increases patients trust in them when they are prescribed by their doctors, and simple name recognition makes the drugs more
acceptable." (DeGeorge Richard ) This makes treatment determinations difficult for physician. As there could be other drugs, not being advertised, that
would work best for the patient. However is the the duty of the physician to use their expertise and knowledge of the patients condition to

Teleological And Deontological Analysis
One might ask, what makes an action ethical? Why some people think that product placement in movies is a considerably ethical phenomena, while
others find it unethical and unacceptable. According to Tsalikis & Fritzsche, (1989, p, 696), ethics is an inquiry into the nature and grounds of morality
where morality means moral judgments, standards, and rules of conduct (Tsalikis, Fritzsche, 1989, p, 696). In other words, ethics, which is a discipline
that deals with what true and false is, is defined as a system of determined theory or moral values (Shea, 1988). Likewise an ethical evaluation is based
on moral philosophy (Reidenbach & Robin, 1990). Therefore, an ethical decision depends on individual moral values, and the judgment of business
activity is influenced by his/her moral philosophy (Wang, 2012).... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The major difference between these two theories is that, deontological theories focus on the specific actions or behaviours of an individual, while
teleological theories focus on the consequences of those actions or behaviours (Hunt & Vitell, 1986). Both of these two streams have several
sub–streams, however, the following sections will seek to examine only two of them since researchers (e.g. Beauchamp & Bowie, 1979; Murphy &
Laczniak, 1981) categorise major moral philosophies into the two major types of deontology and teleology, including utilitarianism (Vitell et al., 2001).
These two main ethical systems will then be discussed in a context of product placement in order to give a theoretical foundation for understanding the
subsequent

Discussion Of Kant's Unethic Theory Or Deontological Ethics
Deontology ( or Deontological Ethics) is the ethic theory that decided the morality of one action based on the action's adherence to a rule or rules. It
is described as "duty" from the word "deon" from Greek (CVP, p.10). Deontology is also contrast from other ethic theory, such as consequentialism or
virtue ethics. It judges the rightness or wrongness of actions themselves, as opposed to the rightness or wrongness of the consequences of those actions
(Consequentialism) or to the character and habits of the actor (Virtue Ethics). In other words, the inside moral worth of actions is duties, aims and
human beings, not the consequences. In order to determine what "right" is its settlement with a moral standard: right takes priority over good. For
instance : ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Kant's theory is considered deontological for numerous reasons. Starting off , Kant states that if people want to act in the morally way, they have to
act from duty, rather than inclination. Inclination means do something for some ulterior motive. With ulterior motive means its based upon wants
,desires and references with no moral worth. In contrast, duty is considered have moral worth. When a person does something because of duty, he or
she does it because it is the right thing to do. It is based on reason and rationality. Next Kant states that actions is are considered right or wrong
depends on the persons intentions. For example: a kid a uncle, A father who planned to kill his son but shoving the son's head into the bathtub filled
with water until the kid drowns. The father was financially unstable and saw his son as a burden to him. However, the kid accidentally slipped in the
bathroom and drowned in the water and fell into the bathtub and drowned to death. The father received the end result as he wanted but in this
circumstance the son was the one who slipped in. Still it is considered immoral because the father had bad intensions from the beginning

Utilitarianism Vs Deontological Ethics
Deontology:
Deontology is the study of the nature of duty and obligation. It comes from the Greek word "deon" that means duty. Deontology ethics is the views of
moral that make decisions. It is the ethics that focuses whether actions are right or wrong themselves, but not the right or wrong of the consequences
of those actions. An example of deontology is the action of killing someone, even if it was in self–defense, is wrong by moral standard.
Immanuel Kant was an 18th–century German philosopher and defines deontological principles. He made a moral system for deontological actions
so they can be considered morally good. The first one is a categorical imperative saying that all actions are "good" if they perform a duty. The
second is the formula of universal law saying that actions apply to everyone and the result must always be good. The third is the formula of
humanity is saying never treat anyone bad or use people for your own advantage. The fourth is the formula of autonomy saying you can't manipulate
people if it goes against their moral right. Lastly is the kingdom of ends that says the actions result in a justice end that results in perfect peace. Kant's
system did not tell people what to do, but if an action was right.
Libertarianism: ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
By utilitarian theory harming the healthy person save the greater number of lives is right. By utilitarian standard, more people are being affected for
the good so harming that one person is justified. For the same situation for a Deontologist, it is considered wrong to harm the healthy person because
by a moral standard killing is wrong because of. It is focused on the action and not what would happen after. A Libertarian would say it would be up
to the healthy person if they wanted to sacrifice themselves for these random people because this person has a self–ownership of their

Deontological View On Drugs And Alcohol Use Essay
A Deontological View on Drug and Alcohol Use Drug and alcohol use is considered to be one of the major issues in the world today. Drugs can
impair us, causing us to make poor decisions as well as cause permanent damage to the body. Deontology is an ethical theory that maintains that
actions are not justified by their consequences; one should do what is morally right as it is their duty. What is morally right in the eyes of a
deontologist is determined by universal moral laws, cultural norms, and religious views. This paper will analyze the morality of drug and alcohol use
through these views. Universal moral laws, as defined by Immanuel Kant, are morals that remain consistent throughout the world regardless of things
like race or religion. For instance, whether you are from Russia or Ethiopia, you know it is morally wrong to commit murder. Through this view, most
drug and alcohol use would be considered ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
At one point in time, it was culturally accepted to use opium in China but not in other countries. In most first and even second world countries, it is
currently accepted to drink alcohol (rate of moderation varies), smoke cigarettes, and drink caffeinated beverages. However, cultural disapproval
occurs situationally. For instance, drinking a lot of alcohol in response to getting a promotion is accepted but the same in response to getting fired is
not. In the situation that a post–operative patient becomes addicted to pain medicines, is the patient morally responsible? Once again, this is a
situation where deontology falls a little thin. Countries such as Canada and Australia refute seemingly universal moral law by having legalized and
otherwise accepted the use of marijuana. According to deontology, what is considered right is far better than what is considered good. It would be
good to be able to treat medical conditions without the risk of addiction but it is right to heal others and free them from

John Stuart Mill, And The Deontological Theory Of Ethics
Frequently brought up in modern conversations between "everyday" people and behavioral researchers alike, issues regarding morality and ethics have
become increasingly prevalent. With the current global political climate drawing attention to and/or raising awareness for various humanitarian crises,
such as the massive destruction in Puerto Rico that has left the entire island in ruin or refugee Rohingya people fleeing persecution in Myanmar and
Bangladesh, it is imperative to understand the logistics of possible relief efforts through a philosophical lens. Two well–developed theories that offer
solutions to such problems are Utilitarianism, proposed by John Stuart Mill, and the Deontological Theory of Ethics, advocated for by Immanuel ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Although originally postulated by Jeremy Bentham, this theory that advocates for the greatest good {sunnum bonum}flourished under the
formulation of John Stuart Mill. A commonly simplified principle, the greatest total net good is similar to that of a mathematical formula {taking
all of the effects of an action, applying them to everyone affected, and finally subtracting the totality of bad effects from that of the relatively good
ones}. Assuming that true "happiness" is a state of pleasure that is lacking any elements of pain, Mill introduces the concept of Higher and Lower
Pleasures in order to differentiate between stimulating intellectual sentiments and mere physical sensations. (Mill, 6) To this end, one would assume
that as a hedonist, {one that perceives a good or successful life to consist of the pursuit and experience of pleasure} Mill's position on both Rescue I
and II would be that that saves the most people, regardless of the circumstances. However, the situations proposed contrast each other in that they lead
back to Foot's initial concern about the difference between" killing and letting die." Rescue I allows for a somewhat lowered sense of obligation
{responsibility if you will}, as it requires the hypothetical rescuers to go off their initial path to save the group of five individuals at risk of drowning
to save only one person from another unfortunate

Deontological Paper
Deontological Paper
Marketing products, services, or even charities to the public has become a very powerful force in our world. Millions of dollars are spent on
advertising each year with the goal of increasing revenue for the business or raising awareness of an organization to the public. Pharmaceutical
companies bring products to the markets that are intended to help people live better lives. Advertising is a relatively new phenomenon for
pharmaceutical companies in the United States. "In 1985, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which has the responsibility for safety
regulations governing drugs, passed a ruling that allowed direct market to consumers on the condition that a great deal of warning information was
provided ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Using this Deontological approach we will look at the pharmaceutical advertising. As a free nation, we have the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit
of happiness. Furthermore, there is a moral obligation for us to do what is right. From the corporate perspective, nearly all other businesses are
allowed to advertise. The purpose of advertising from a corporate perspective is to teach individuals what their products offer the public so they
can increase profit for the company. There are rules that they have to follow to ensure the information is accurate. There is nobody forcing a
purchase of the drugs, it is mere information that is available to all public for their benefit. There is a choice that is made by the public. They will
either choose to purchase the drugs that will help them, or will not. From the public perspective, they want to have access to the information that
will help them lead a better life regardless of who they are. Under the veil of ignorance, we should all be able to know and understand every option
that is available to us so that we can live happier and healthy lives. Pharmaceutical products offer people a better way to live their lives no matter
who you are. There are drugs for arthritis that help people live better by reducing pain and increasing mobility; drugs for helping people get a better
night of sleep; drugs for

Difference Between Deontological Utilitarian And Virtue...
Deontological, Utilitarian and Virtue Ethics Theories
Deontological Ethics is an Approach to Ethics that decides goodness from looking at acts, or the standards and obligations that the individual doing the
demonstration strove to satisfy. This is in Contrast to Insignificant, in which rightness is in view of the Consequences of a demonstration, and not the
demonstration without anyone else. In Deontology, a demonstration may be viewed as right regardless of the fact that the demonstration creates a
terrible result, in the event that it takes after the standard that one ought to do unto others as they would have done unto them", and regardless of the
possibility that the individual who does the demonstration needs Virtue and had an awful goal... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Kant's Ethics are established on his perspective of Rationality as a definitive decent and his conviction that all individuals are in a broad sense
balanced creatures. This prompted the most essential part of Kant's Ethics, the definition of the Categorical basic, which is the measure for whether an
adage is great or awful. Case in point, holding the proverb slaughters any individual who bothers you and applying it generally would bring about a
world which would soon be without individuals and without anybody exited to murder. Virtue Ethics depicts the character of ethical specialists as a
main impetus for Ethical conduct, and is utilized to portray the Ethics of Socrates, Aristotle, and other early Greek savants. Socrates was one of the first
Greek thinkers to support both researchers and the normal national to turn their consideration from the outside world to the state of mankind. In this
perspective, learning having a direction on human life was put most astounding, all other information being optional. To Socrates, a man must get to be
mindful of each reality pertinent to his presence, on the off chance that he wishes to achieve self–information. He placed that individuals will actually
do what is great,

Kant's Deontological Approach Essay
Kant would argue that you should never treat people merely as instruments; never just as means to your goals. As a deontological perspective, we
recoil from torturing the child because it treats a person only as a means to an end. Kant's deontological approach consists of two universal rules by
which moral questions can be addressed. The first one states: 'Act as though the maxim of your action were by your will to become a universal law
of nature.' His second rule states that: 'Act so that you treat humanity, whether in your person or in that of another, always as an end and never as a
means only.' The act of torture under the first rule cannot be justified as we would not accept it being universalised and can potentially be used against
ourselves.... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Theoretically, I would agree and act on Kant's philosophy. His principles rest on a categorical imperative and judges what fundamentally makes an act
morally right or wrong by locating morality in certain duties and rights, regardless of the consequences. Although it is accurate that torturing the
innocent child produces the greatest amount of happiness, you would not want others to use you as an object without regard to your will. Choosing
on the child's behalf to torture him, to extract the bomb's location from the terrorist, is inherently wrong. However, in reality, I would act so as to
produce the greatest good for the greatest number and most importantly less pain because hundreds of thousands will die. Consequently, I would go
with the Utilitarianism approach because there are too many lives to risk for Kant's belief. As a consequentialist then, I will permit torturing the child,
for the only valid option is to save as many lives as possible because the highest principle of morality is maximising the general welfare. Despite,
Utilitarianism has no room for personal rights, the good of the many comes first and especially when the lives of hundreds of thousands are at risk. In
this light, Bentham's argument for torturing the child for the ticking bomb to be stopped is the most sensible approach in that while torturing the child
is inherently wrong, it would

Deontological Libertarianism
I.Topic: Libertarianism
II.Definition: Libertarianism is a political philosophy that affirms the rights of individuals to liberty (Vallentyne & van der Vossen, 2014). The basic
idea is the individual is in the best position to know what is best for him or her and should be allowed to make choices without undue outside
interference. Each person has to decide what is in his or her best interest, and the government should not interfere with personal decisions, especially
when it comes to redistribution of wealth and rights (Gibson, 2014, p. 113).
a.Description: Libertarianism is a belief sometimes termed pure justice. It is a system providing open opportunities to all assuming that any resulting
distribution will necessarily be fair (Gibson, 2014, p. 113).
i.The key concepts of libertarianism is the belief of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Deontological libertarianism is rights–based from Robert Nozick who stated, "liberty upsets patterns". This was due to the state justifying formulaic
distributions based on some predetermined principle (Gibson, 2014, p. 113).
IV.Application: Ethical Decision Making and Conflicts of Responsibility
a.Evidence: Subjective and Objective Responsibilities as a Public Administrator
i.Objective responsibility involves two dimensions: accountability and imposed obligation. It involves responsibility to someone or come collective
body and responsibility for certain tasks, subordinate personnel, and goal achievement (Cooper, 2012, p. 73) ii. Subjective responsibility is within the
libertarian belief of an expression of our beliefs, personal and professional values, and character traits (Cooper, 2012, p. 72)
b.Relevance to Conflicts of Responsibility in authority, role and interest The fiduciary character of public service involves responsibility to act on
behalf of the citizenry (Cooper, 2012, p. 94)
i.Conflict of Authority imposed by two or more sources of authority such as law, organizational superiors, elected official and the public (Cooper, 2012,
p.

Deontological Ethics
Deontological Ethics in Location–based Social Media There are so many location aware applications on my "smart" phone; I do not know how I
could have lived without these features. There are applications that tell me where is the closes gym that I am a member of. There are applications
that give me information on the weather of the current city. There are even applications that will locate the closest "driver" to taxi me wherever I
want to go. And of course, all these can be shared on facebook or various other social networking sites. With the narrowing gap of our online
presence and real life, these bring on various questions on the data that we provide and who can see. As with all technology issues in the current age,
privacy is a... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In the gadget world, this has been a huge issue with every handset manufacturer suing eachother, wanting courts to put injunctions on their products
so they don't have a competition. The end result might be that the company sells few more gadgets but stifles the competition hurting the users. The
flipside is true for these manufacturers. While these intellectual properties' specific process might be easy to judge, design processes are subjective.
When companies sue and win injunctions on other gadgets because they "look alike" would be immoral in that while they reach an end result they
might prefer, they are going about in an obscure way. The users will have to use these services with their moral conscience as well. A user could
encounter a service at a restaurant that they pay for that is not up to the standards; they can post up on Yelp or similar review sites about that
restaurant. These reviews are valuable to the restaurants and they will do the best they can to please the customers. If the reviews are malicious in
nature, they will not be moral. However, if the review is a critique of the restaurant in a manner that it will bring light to the issues, it will be moral.
Moral absolutism states that some actions are absolutely right or wrong. If providers are not clear with their intentions on how to use the user's location
based data

Deontological Moral Rationality Of Immanuel Kant
Question No. 1 Answer:
The categorical imperative is the focal philosophical idea in the deontological moral rationality of Immanuel Kant. Kant trusted that the main thing
of intrinsic moral worth is a good will. Kant says that the good will is not good on account of what it influences or finishes or as a result of its
sufficiency to accomplish some proposed end; it is good simply because of its willing, i.e., it is good of itself. A maxim is the summed up tenet that
characterizes the intentions in a man's actions. For Kant, a will that is good is one that is acting by the maxim of making the best decision in light of
the fact that it is right thing to do. The moral worth of an action is dictated by regardless of whether it was endless supply ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Kant concentrated on ethics as the practice of moral principle and duty; counter–indicate the utilitarian methodology, which tries to foresee
con–arrangements taking into account results. Kant couldn't help contradicting different philosophers, for example, Mill Utilitarians and the Hume
school of enthusiasm, that maximizing happiness was the objective of ethics. He held, rather, that maintaining one's duty to the moral law was the
reason for ethics (DeGeorge, Chapter. 3). Veneration for the moral law made one deserving of happiness however not the slightest bit ensured it. To
make his moral hypothesis more available, Kant made three moral tests known as the categorical imperative. As indicated by Kant, we can decide our
duty through our capacity to reason. Form 2 which was created by Kant portrays the dignity and respect: Act in a manner that we generally treat
humanity, whether in our own particular individual or in the individual of whatever other, never basically as methods; yet dependably in the meantime
as an end. Form 3 by Kant is about intention which says that all maxims as continuing from our own particular making of law should blend with a
conceivable kingdom of

Ethics Of Duty And Deontological Ethics
Ethics of duty (ethics of principle, deontological ethics)
From the Greek for "duty" (deontos), ethics based in duty and one that reasons from foundational principles which tell us what our duties are. Hence,
actions are right and wrong for reasons other than their consequences. Deontological ethics or deontology is the normative ethical position that judges
the morality of an action based on the action's adherence to a rule or rules. It is sometimes described as duty, obligatory or rule based ethics, because
rules bind you to your duty (Bentham, J., 1789 (1948). Deontological theories are better understood in contrast to consequential theories; a look at
consequentialism and a survey of the problems with it that motivate its deontological opponents provides a helpful prelude to taking up deontological
theories themselves. Consequentialists hold that choices, acts or intentions are to be morally assessed solely by the "distillate" or states of affairs they
produce or the end.
There are many possible grounds for knowing duty: natural laws, the social contract, reason. Contrary to common opinion, this theory is not inherently
"absolutist." According to Kant, morality is based on a rational respect for persons (moral agents) as the foundation of value. Kant's ... Show more
It provides for moral reasoning, such that an individual may decide not to tell a lie not because it breaks some moral law or because it's an obligation
but because it is dishonest. Virtue ethics places focus on moral agents and their lives rather than on actions or outcomes (Crisp, Slote 1997). For
example a good cricket player will play the game well not just to win; he has qualities or excellences (arГЄte) which are virtues such as good
sportsmanship, fidelity, perseverance and

Deontological Vs. Teleological Ethical Systems Essay examples
Deontological moral systems are characterized by a focus upon adherence to independent moral rules or duties. To make the correct moral choices,
we have to understand what our moral duties are and what correct rules exist to regulate those duties. When we follow our duty, we are behaving
morally. When we fail to follow our duty, we are behaving immorally. Typically in any deontological system, our duties, rules, and obligations are
determined by God. Being moral is thus a matter of obeying God. Deontological moral systems typically stress the reasons why certain actions are
performed. Simply following the correct moral rules is often not sufficient; instead, we have to have the correct motivations. This might allow a person
to not be... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
There are seven major ethical systems that make up Deontological and Teleological Ethical Systems. Ethical formalism is what is good is that which
conforms to the categorical imperative. Ethical formalism is the doctrine that certain actions are good (ie, the right thing to do) or evil (ie, the wrong
thing to do) in and of themselves, apart from any beneficial or harmful effect that they might have on individuals. Although many reasons are provided
for why these actions are right or wrong, none of the reasons involves the effects that such actions have on individuals. Contemporary commentators on
alternative methods of conception frequently adopt this ethical attitude. The second major ethical system is Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is a
philosophical theory of morality and "how one should act". It states that one should act so as to maximize the amount of happiness in the world
(focuses on the CONSEQUENCES of actions). That is, you should ONLY do "X" if "X" positively contributes to the happiness in the world. So you
might think of it this way: Should I steal Mary's candy when she's not looking? My happiness: +200 points Mary's happiness: –300 points. You must
consider EVERYONE'S happiness EQUALLY, so clearly you should not steal the candy, because it decreases the happiness in the world (
–100). The
next major Ethical system is Religion. Religion is very difficult to define – it seems that everyone has a

Deontological Vs Teleological Research
Question: 1. Quite often in ethical discussions, individuals will present either a deontological or a
Teleological point of view. Explain briefly how these two positions differ.
Answer a: The difference between a deontological or a teleological are as a teleological hypothesis says that the fundamental or extreme measure or
standard of what is ethically right, wrong, mandatory, and so forth., is the immoral esteem that is brought into being. The last advance, specifically or
in a roundabout way, must be to the similar measure of great created, or rather to the near offset of great over malevolent delivered. Subsequently, a
demonstration is correct if and on the off chance that it or the standard under which it falls produces, will presumably ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Basically, it implies helpfulness, originating from the Latin word utilize signifying 'helpful'. As per Bentham, the ethical value of a demonstration relies
on the results it gives, thus recommends the helpfulness of the activity. The inquiry can emerge as to value to "whom" and in what way. What does it
intend to say 'convenience'? He was not alluding to simply the convenience of things or activities, however to the degree to which these things or
activities push the general satisfaction. Bentham recognizes the helpfulness regarding the 'best satisfaction for the greatest number of

Kant's Deontological Moral Perspective
From his deontological moral perspective, this is what Kant will have to say about this person that her activities are moral in view of the individual's
will or expectation of acting. Kant's hypothesis can be ordered as a deontological because actions are not assessed to be ethically permissible on the
establishment of results they yield, yet rather on the type of the specialist's will in acting, consequently his activities depend on obligation and not
important. Kantianism is based on values of sayings, willing, and the unmitigated objective. An adage is a general run or principle elucidation what a
man takes him to do and the conditions in which he takes himself to do it.
This rule is universal sable and that the saying can be connected dependably to everybody who come crosswise over comparative circumstances, in
this way willed as an all–inclusive law. Willing as the second part of Kant's hypothesis includes the specialist reliably conferring oneself to make an
activity happen. A man will is conflicting on the off chance that he wills that x be the situation and he wills that y be the situation and it's outlandish for
x and y to be the situation together. The key part of the clear cut basic of Kant's hypothesis is that one must act in a manner that ... Show more content
Kant trusted that exclusive a positive attitude is ethically profitable. A positive attitude recognizes what its obligation is (that is, the cooperative
attitude comprehends what reason orders it to do.) And the cooperative attitude DOES the obedient demonstration in light of the fact that the
cooperative attitude is loyal. Kant contends that a few qualities are useful to the cooperative attitude, for example, balance, poise are a MEANS to the
finish of a positive attitude, however are not an end in

Kant's Deontological Theory: Applying Ethical Theory
Applying Ethical Theory
Jeralyn Bowden
Ethics
Ethical Theory
Capella University
November, 2016
Kant's Deontological Theory
The philosopher who refined deontological morals was Immanuel Kant. As indicated by Kant the way of profound quality is to do one's obligation
notwithstanding when we are not slanted to do it, and not on account of we fear the results of not doing it ("Kant, Immanuel: Metaphysics | Internet
Encyclopedia of Philosophy," n.d.). The ethical individual does her obligation paying little heed to the outcomes. In Kant's view the individual who
does his obligation to seem ethical, is not moral. The individual who does his obligation to complete it over and, is not moral. The individual who does
his obligation to maintain a strategic distance from negative outcomes, is not moral. Just the individual who does his obligation since it is his
obligation, is moral.
Act deontology and rule deontology are two types of deontological ethics. Act deontology states that there are no strict ethical acts followed when
making ethical choices. Decisions should be made according to each person doing what they feel is the right thing to do at each moment.
Workplace Example
One subsystem of behavioral examination is the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He likewise trusted that the particular sorts of practices are found out and created after some time through practice too until the ethicalness turns into a
characteristic and typical part of an individual's intellectual procedure and usage (THEORIES OF ETHICS – School of Education – Syracuse
University., n.d.).. It was Aristotle's belief that in order to resolve ethical issues in a morally, justified way, a person must abide by virtues that are
decent (Rachels & Rachels,

Deontological and Teleological Ethical Theory
Teleological Ethics = Consequentialist Ethics
Morality of an act is based on the outcome or consequence of the act
Deontological Ethics = Non – Consequentialist Ethics
Morality of an act is based in the act itself.
Types of Teleological Ethics 1. Utilitarianism– Utilitarian moral theory is classical utilitarianism, 2. Varieties of ancient Greek virtueethics – Aristotle
Ethics is an Example a. The goal of ethics is to explain how one achieves the good life for human beings.
There are only two basic kinds of prescriptive moral theories: teleological theories, deontological theories
TELEOLOGICAL ETHICAL THEORIES
Teleological moral theories locate moral goodness in the consequences of our behavior and not the behavior itself. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In early nineteenth–century America, many members of the anti–slavery movement argued that slavery was wrong, even though slaveholders and
southern society in general, economically benefited from it. Suppose, also that the slaveholders were also able to condition the slaves to the point
where they actually enjoyed living under slavery. From a teleological perspective, slavery might appear to be an ideal economic institution. Everybody
is happy! A deontologist, however, would argue that even if the American government conducted a detailed cost/benefit analysis of slavery and decided
that it created more pleasure in society than pain, it would still be wrong. Therefore, deontologists believe that right and wrong have nothing to do with
pleasure, pain, or consequences.
Morality is based on whether acts conflict with moral rules or not, and the motivation behind those acts. An act is therefore, good if and only if it
was performed out of a desire to do one's duty and obey a rule. In other words, act out of a good will. Hence, slavery is wrong, not because of its
negative consequences, but because it violates an absolute moral rule.
In the Western tradition there have been two approaches to the establishment of deontological principles: divine command theory and Kantian theory.
DIVINE COMMAND THEORY
Divine Command Theory states that the moral goodness of an act is based on religious authority. Hence, for

Essay about Deontological Advertising
Depending on one's perspective or level of awareness, the term consumerism might take on a variety of meanings. One thing is quite certain, however,
we Americans enjoy consuming and more so, doing it conveniently. Unsurprisingly, the field of advertising in the business world is specifically
dedicated to understanding exactly what products or services are of interest to us, the consumers. Commercial entities spend considerable amount of
resources to advertising. The pharmaceutical industry is no different. It is with this context in mind and utilizing the Deontological framework, that I
will examine the ethical fabric of direct pharmaceutical marketing to consumers.
In the age of information, we are no longer limited to television and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Let us visit the tenets by which Immanuel Kant, a deontological philosopher, outlined his approach to morals in terms of decisions and acts. In his
theory, Kant proposed an objective way of coming to an ethical answer to common "should I do it or, not" dilemmas. His method, which he termed the
categorical imperative, was at the root of his moral philosophy (Johnson). In it, he outlined his three maxims by which to measure a proposed act.
These were universality, by which an act faced scrutiny in answering whether the act would survive all persons doing it all the time. Would the world
succumb as a result? If considered acceptable one would then accept the act. The second maxim involves us treating humans as ends as opposed to
means. Kant's second maxim would have us prevent malfeasance and manipulation of humans as a means to an end. The third maxim was the ultimate
test. In contends that one must act as if one is the highest moral authority in the world. And, as such, the ultimate burden of acting moral, regardless of
consequence, would rest on us (Kemerling). With this in mind, overlaying direct marketing to consumers upon this theory should shed light on some
questions behind the ethics of pharmaceutical companies.
In the 1980's, drug companies were banned from advertising prescription drugs to consumers. That same decade brought changes in these regulations
allowing companies to advertise, mostly in

Kant's Deontological Ethics
The implication of Kant's Deontological Ethics is that a human being should not make a promise if they don't intend on keeping it. As well as, a
human being should not lie or break a promise for the sake of achieving or escaping from something because in the end they will suffer more rather
than benefit from it. Kant says that if a human being wants to make a false promise, then they should ask themselves this, "Is there going to be any
consequences from this lie?" If not, then it can be an advantage to the person. Kant talks about the imperatives as good: hypothetical; attainment of
something else and categorical; good in itself. According to Kant, humans' action should always be viewed at the same time as an end (59). No, this
cannot be

Deontological vs. Teleological Ethical Systems Essay
Deontological moral systems are characterized by a focus upon adherence to independent moral rules or duties. To make the correct moral choices,
we have to understand what our moral duties are and what correct rules exist to regulate those duties. When we follow our duty, we are behaving
morally. When we fail to follow our duty, we are behaving immorally. Typically in any deontological system, our duties, rules, and obligations are
determined by God. Being moral is thus a matter of obeying God. Deontological moral systems typically stress the reasons why certain actions are
performed. Simply following the correct moral rules is often not sufficient; instead, we have to have the correct motivations. This might allow a person
to not be... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Ethical formalism is the doctrine that certain actions are good (ie, the right thing to do) or evil (ie, the wrong thing to do) in and of themselves, apart
from any beneficial or harmful effect that they might have on individuals. Although many reasons are provided for why these actions are right or
wrong, none of the reasons involves the effects that such actions have on individuals. Contemporary commentators on alternative methods of
conception frequently adopt this ethical attitude. The second major ethical system is Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is a philosophical theory of morality
and "how one should act". It states that one should act so as to maximize the amount of happiness in the world (focuses on the CONSEQUENCES of
actions). That is, you should ONLY do "X" if "X" positively contributes to the happiness in the world. So you might think of it this way: Should I steal
Mary's candy when she's not looking? My happiness: +200 points Mary's happiness: –300 points. You must consider EVERYONE'S happiness
EQUALLY, so clearly you should not steal the candy, because it decreases the happiness in the world (
–100). The next major Ethical system is
Religion. Religion is very difficult to define – it seems that everyone has a different idea of what it is. Most people will simply look in the dictionary
or use something else equally simplistic. Although that might be fine for everyday conversations, it isn't sufficient for the sort of discussions that
appear on this

Importance Of Deontological Ethics In The Movie Robot
Kant, a central figure in the world of philosophy and ethics, "argued that morality must ultimately be grounded in the concept of duty, or obligations
that humans have to one another, and never in the consequences of human actions" (Tavani, 47). This argument from Kant serves as the foundation for
deontological ethics, which believes that morality comes in the form of duties; that humans have the moral duty to do right things and the moral duty
to not do bad things. Looking at Frank & Robot, with the imagined–knowledge that perhaps Robot has deontological ethics ingrained in its
programming, is important because it shows some of the issues that would appear if we use deontological ethics as the base our future robots' ethical
reasoning.... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Instead of behaving a certain way due to duty, virtue–based ethics gives people (or robots) the tools and knowledge that allow and show them how to
live a virtuous life, which they are expected to live. Virtue–based ethics shines light on the importance of value–alignment in regards to artificially
intelligent machines and the potential dangers that can arise if the wrong values are instilled within future robots. One of the most interesting
aspects of Robot is the fact that it seems to live in a completely different ethical world, which is why Robot and Frank get along so well. Like
Frank, Robot does not prescribe to any set social rules or ethical values as it truly devotes all of its time and energy into its goal of bettering Frank.
Robot simply makes choices based off of which decisions align with its morals (bettering Frank) even if it hurts other humans along the way. This is a
major obstacle that is going to become more prevalent as the subject of which artificial moral agents will be implemented within robotic machines
leaves science–fiction and transfers into reality. Humans, in regards to virtue–based ethics, predominantly focus their attention on their own (and others')

Deontological Ethics : Ethics And Ethics
Deontological Ethics
Deontological Ethics are based on normative ethics position that judges the morality of an action that in line with rules. In other words, deontology
falls within the nomenclature of moral theories that guide and assess our choices of what we ought to do (deontic theories), in contrast to (aretaic
[virtue] theories) that–fundamentally, at least–guide and assess what kind of person (in terms of character traits) we are and should be.
In contemporary moral philosophy, deontology is one of those kinds of normative theories regarding which choices are morally required, forbidden, or
permitted. In other words, deontology falls within the domain of moral theories that guide and assess our choices of what we ought to do (deontic
theories), in contrast to (aretaic [virtue] theories) that–fundamentally, at least–guide and assess what kind of person (in terms of character traits) we are
and should be. And within that domain, deontologists–those who subscribe to deontological theories of morality.
The deontological ethics theories briefly taken a look at deontologists ' foil, consequentialist theories of right action, we turn now to examine
deontological theories. In contrast to consequentialist theories, deontological theories judge the morality of choices by criteria different from the states
of affairs those choices bring about. The most familiar forms of deontology, and also the forms presenting the greatest contrast to consequentialism,
hold that some

Deontological Code Of Ethics Essay
1.Define the term ethics. Ethics is the study of human behavior and the morality of each individual. 2.Define the terms deontology (deontological
approach) and teleology (teleological approach). Deontology: is the act of doing the right thing no matter what the consequences are. For example, if an
individual has a family member that killed someone then, it is his/her duty to go against the family member to say the truth. Even though it is bad to go
against a family member, according to the deontological approach, it is doing the right thing. This individual is doing the right thing because he/she is
not hiding anything, he/she is being truthful, and he/she is being honest. Teleology: is the act of doing the right thing depending what the... Show more
The goal of this theory is to eliminate suffering amongst everyone. This ethical theory is different to Kant's ethical theory by the way utilitarianism is
more towards the happiness route, while Kant's theory is more towards following the moral rules. Kant's ethical theory is not about maximizing
happiness or pleasing anyone. This theory is more about acting and doing things the moral way such as duties that are morally right. 4. Compare rule
utilitarianism with act utilitarianism. Rule utilitarianism is compared to act utilitarianism by the way it promotes happiness. A rule utilitarian is
concerned more with the rule, yet by pleasing people. On the other hand, act utilitarianism is concerned with individual acts. For example, being
honest to an individual will generate happiness. 5. Contrast a right with a duty and a right with a privilege. A right is a form of freedom and liberty.
This allows people to have rights and to be able to do certain things. On the other hand, a duty is an act that has to be done. This is not done from an
individual perspective it is done through obligation and respect to the moral

Deontological Ethics Kant

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Featured

Featured (20)

Deontological Ethics Kant