1
ENG 1213
Research Essay (20%)
Draft #1 due Wednesday, November 13th by 8:00am in the online drop-box
Bring a physical or digital copy to class.
Draft #2 due Friday, November 22nd by 8:00am in the online drop-box (1200 word minimum)
Bring a physical or digital copy to class.
Final due Monday, November 25th by 8:50am in the online drop-box (1600 word minimum)
Instructions:
Research a topic to construct an essay around your own analytical or argumentative thesis
statement. Your analysis/argument should be informed by secondary sources that reflect
relevant factual information as well as current scholarship (including debates) within your field
of research.
Option 1: An analytical essay interprets a primary text using secondary sources to inform and
engage your own analysis.
Option 2: An argumentative essay argues a social, political, or institutional point; informed by
and engaged with secondary sources that illuminate the existing positions on the subject.
Option 3: A problem/solution essay identifies an existing social, political, or institutional
problem and offers a solution based on information from secondary sources.
Your research essay should demonstrate:
a knowledge and critical assessment of the discourse of its subject (the academic
writings, case studies, histories, past and current debates—i.e. your secondary sources)
your own analysis and original argument on the subject.
NB: It is difficult to establish an original analysis/argument on commonly discussed
topics such as debates around gun control, abortion, and marijuana legalization; choose a
topic or an approach that will allow you to offer a new perspective.
2
Additionally, essays should:
Develop the stated thesis (a clearly defined and original stance)
Effectively incorporate 6-10 secondary sources, representative of the existing discourse.
Demonstrate critical thinking and knowledge of the subject material.
Support and defend the thesis through detailed argument, analysis, and evidence.
Additional Requirements:
Before submitting your essay, first you will submit:
A research proposal (due Monday, September 23rd)
An annotated bibliography (due Friday, October 4th)
A formal outline (due Monday, October 28th)
All three components must be submitted before you turn in your final essay.
For this assignment, you may expand upon your own previous work.
However, your research essay must be at least 70% new material and include at least
4 new sources. Previous work must be submitted at the time of the proposal.
Failure to comply with these guidelines will lead to plagiarism.
Format:
All essays must be typed, double spaced, 12 point Times New Roman font
Essays should be 1,600-2,000 words (approximately 5-6 pages)
Essay should include proper citations (a MLA Works Cited Page, Chicago Style
footnotes or endnotes, or an APA Reference Pa ...
1. 1
ENG 1213
Research Essay (20%)
Draft #1 due Wednesday, November 13th by 8:00am in the
online drop-box
Bring a physical or digital copy to class.
Draft #2 due Friday, November 22nd by 8:00am in the online
drop-box (1200 word minimum)
Bring a physical or digital copy to class.
Final due Monday, November 25th by 8:50am in the online
drop-box (1600 word minimum)
Instructions:
Research a topic to construct an essay around your own
analytical or argumentative thesis
statement. Your analysis/argument should be informed by
secondary sources that reflect
2. relevant factual information as well as current scholarship
(including debates) within your field
of research.
Option 1: An analytical essay interprets a primary text using
secondary sources to inform and
engage your own analysis.
Option 2: An argumentative essay argues a social, political, or
institutional point; informed by
and engaged with secondary sources that illuminate the existing
positions on the subject.
Option 3: A problem/solution essay identifies an existing social,
political, or institutional
problem and offers a solution based on information from
secondary sources.
Your research essay should demonstrate:
discourse of its
subject (the academic
writings, case studies, histories, past and current debates—i.e.
your secondary sources)
NB: It is difficult to establish an original analysis/argument on
commonly discussed
3. topics such as debates around gun control, abortion, and
marijuana legalization; choose a
topic or an approach that will allow you to offer a new
perspective.
2
Additionally, essays should:
ted thesis (a clearly defined and original
stance)
-10 secondary sources,
representative of the existing discourse.
material.
is through detailed argument,
analysis, and evidence.
4. Additional Requirements:
A research proposal (due Monday, September 23rd)
An annotated bibliography (due Friday, October 4th)
A formal outline (due Monday, October 28th)
All three components must be submitted before you turn in your
final essay.
work.
However, your research essay must be at least 70% new
material and include at least
4 new sources. Previous work must be submitted at the time of
the proposal.
Failure to comply with these guidelines will lead to plagiarism.
Format:
Roman font
ys should be 1,600-2,000 words (approximately 5-6
pages)
5. Page, Chicago Style
footnotes or endnotes, or an APA Reference Page).
-box as
Word documents
(.doc or .docx)
Research Essay.doc).
3
Grading Criteria:
vention
throughout the essay.
argument/position.
6. ons (including proper
formatting).
Word Count: The minimum word count is 1,600 words (not
including end citations).
1599-1536 words up to 4% will be deducted from the final
grade
1535-1440 words 5% will be deducted from the final grade
1439-1360 words 10% will be deducted from the final grade
1359-1280 words 15% will be deducted from the final grade
1279-1200 words 20% will be deducted from the final grade
1199-1120 words 25% will be deducted from the final grade
1119-1040 words 30% will be deducted from the final grade
1039-960 words 35% will be deducted from the final grade
959-880 40% will be deducted from the final grade
879 words or less The essay will not be accepted.
7. 4
Rubric:
An A essay
will present a clearly defined thesis statement, which is
supported throughout the
essay by insightful analysis of primary and secondary sources.
The introduction will
establish the scope of the subject, provide all necessary
background information, and
the writer’s own stance (the thesis). Body paragraphs will begin
with specific topic
sentences that illustrate one main point of the writer’s own
argument. A conclusion
will reestablish the writer’s thesis by synthesizing the
arguments and framing its
8. significance. The essay will demonstrate knowledge of multiple
positions (including
relevant counterarguments) to illustrate the validity of the
writer’s own position.
Secondary sources will be cited correctly; there will be few to
no grammatical errors
or typos.
A B essay
will present a thesis statement, which is supported throughout
the essay by analysis
of primary and secondary sources. The introduction will
establish the thesis and
suggest the scope of the subject. Body paragraphs will contain
one main idea
supporting the thesis. The conclusion will reestablish the thesis,
but may not suggest
the significance or relevance. Secondary sources will include
multiple positions and
be cited correctly. Grammatical errors or typos will not hinder
the clarity of the
writer’s argument.
9. A C essay will suggest the writer’s position on the subject,
though the thesis statement may be
undeveloped or not established within the introduction.
Secondary sources will
provide evidence, but may not be fully analyzed or explained by
the writer. Relevant
counterarguments may not be fully considered or included.
Citation errors,
grammatical errors, and typos hinder the clarity of the writer’s
argument.
A D or F essay will summarize an existing argument without
offering an original stance or position.
Paragraphs will offer little or no analysis of the subject.
Secondary sources might not
be considered or included. Citation errors, grammatical errors,
and typos hinder the
clarity of the writer’s argument.
Case Study - Global Mobile Corporation
10. “Damn it, he's done it again!”
Charlie Newburg had to get up and walk around his office, he
was so frustrated. He had been
reviewing the most recent design, parts, and assembly
specifications for Global Mobile's latest
smart phone (code named: Nonphixhun) that had been released
for production the previous
Thursday. The files had just come back to Charlie's engineering
services department with a
caustic note that began, “This one can't be produced, either…”
It was the fourth time production
had returned the design.
Newburg, director of engineering for the Global Mobile
Corporation, was normally a quiet
person. But the Nonphixhun project was stretching his patience;
it was beginning to appear like
several other new products that had hit delays and problems in
the transition from design to
production during the eight months Charlie had worked for
Global Mobile. These problems were
nothing new at Global Mobile's Asian factory; Charlie's
predecessor in the engineering job had
11. run afoul of them, too, and had finally been fired for protesting
too vehemently about the other
departments. But the Nonphixhun phone should have been
different. Charlie and the firm's
president, Hannah Hoover, had video-conferenced two months
earlier (on July 3, 2006) with the
factory superintendent, Tyson Wang, to smooth the way for the
new phone's design. He thought
back to the meeting …
• “Now, we all know there's a tight deadline on the
Nonphixhun,” Hannah Hoover said, “and
Charlie's done well to ask us to talk about its introduction. I'm
counting on both of you to find
any snags in the system, and to work together to get that first
production run out by October
2. Can you do it?” “We can do it in production if we get a
clean design two weeks from
now, as scheduled,” answered Tyson Wang, the factory
manager. “Charlie and I have already
talked about that, of course. I've spoken with our circuit board
and other parts suppliers and
scheduled assembly capacity, and we'll be ready. If the design
goes over schedule, though, I'll
12. have to fill in with other runs, and it will cost us a bundle to
break in for the Nonphixhun.
How does it look in engineering, Charlie?” “I've just reviewed
the design for the second
time,” Charlie replied. “If Marianne Price can keep the
salespeople out of our hair, and avoid
any more last minute changes, we've got a shot. I've pulled my
technical support people off of
three other overdue jobs to get this one out. But, Tyson, that
means we can't spring engineers
loose to confer with your production people on other
manufacturing problems.” “Well
Charlie, most of those problems are caused by the engineers,
and we need them to resolve the
difficulties. We've all agreed that production problems come
from both of us bowing to sales
pressure, and putting equipment into production before the
designs are really ready. That's
just what we're trying to avoid on the Nonphixhun. But I can't
have 500 people sitting on their
hands waiting for an answer from your people. We'll have to
have some engineering
support.” Hannah Hoover broke in, “So long as you two can
13. talk calmly about the problem
I'm confident you can resolve it. What a relief it is, Charlie, to
hear the way you're
approaching this. With Brady (the previous director of
engineering), this conversation would
have been a shouting match. Right, Tyson?” Tyson nodded and
smiled. “Now there's one
other thing you should both be aware of,” Hoover continued.
“Doc Brown and I talked last
night about a new battery-charging technique, one that might
reduce the charging time of the
Nonphixhun by 25%. There's a chance Doc can come up with it
before the Nonphixhun
reaches production, and if it's possible, I'd like to use the new
process. That would give us a
real jump on the competition and quiet the environmentalists.”
Four days after that meeting, Charlie found that two of his key
people on the Nonphixhun
project had been called to an emergency video consultation
about a problem in final
assembly: The two halves of the new smartphone interface
wouldn't fit together because
recent changes in the face required a different chassis design for
14. the rear end.
One week later, Doc Brown proudly walked into Charlie's
office with the new battery
casing. “This won't affect the other modules of the Nonphixhun
much,” Doc had said. “Look,
it takes three new pins, a new connector, and some new
shielding, and that's all.”
Charlie had tried to resist the last-minute design changes, but
Hannah Hoover had stood
firm. With considerable overtime by the engineers and technical
support staff, engineering
services should still be able to finish documenting the parts and
specifications in time.
Two hardware engineers and three support staff went into 12-
hour days to get the
Nonphixhun ready, but the specifications were still five days
late reaching Tyson Wang. Two
days later, the files came back to Charlie, heavily commented in
red. Wang worked all day
Saturday to review the job and found more than a dozen
discrepancies in the specifications—
most of them caused by the new battery-charging process and
insufficient checking time
before release. Correction of these design faults gave rise to a
15. new generation of
discrepancies: Wang's cover note on the second return of the
prints indicated that he had had
to release the assembly capacity reserved for the Nonphixhun.
On the third iteration, Wang
committed other production capacity to another rush job. The
Nonphixhun would be at least
one month late getting into production. Marianne Price, the
vice-president for sales, was
furious. Her customer needed units now. Global Mobile was the
customer's only supplier not
to come out with a new model this quarter.
“Here we go again,” thought Newburg.
COMPANY HISTORY
Global Mobile Corporation traced its lineage through several
generations of electronics
technology. Its original founder, Bob Murray, launched the firm
in 1960 as Global Electronics
& Equipment Co. to manufacture several electronic testing
devices he had invented as an
engineering faculty member at a large university. The firm
entered communications
16. equipment in 1980. A well-established corps of direct sales
representatives, mostly engineers,
called on industrial, scientific, and government accounts but
concentrated heavily on original
equipment manufacturers. Using their technical know-how, they
entered the mobile phone
market in the mid-to-late 1980s and changed their name to
Global Mobile Corporation. In this
market, Global Mobile had developed a reputation as a source
of high-quality, innovative
designs. The firm's salespeople fed a continual stream of
challenging problems into the
engineering department, where the creative genius of Doc
Brown and several dozen other
engineers “converted problems to solutions” (as the sales
brochure bragged). Product design,
especially hardware and structural design, formed the spearhead
of Global Mobile's growth.
By 2010, Global Mobile offered a wide range of products in
two major lines. Mobile phone
sales had benefited from the phenomenal growth of cell phones.
However, the shift from
analog to digital technology and the emergence of smart phones
mean that mobile phones
17. only accounted for 35% of company sales. Smart phone sales,
on the other hand, had
blossomed and, with the rapid technological changes and Global
Mobile's reputation, there
was an increasing demand for phones with unique features,
ranging from specialized screen
displays, functions, applications, and novel form factors.
The company had grown from 100 employees in 1980 to more
than 2,000 in 2010.
Hannah Hoover, who had been a student of the company's
founder, had presided over
most of that growth and took great pride in preserving the
family spirit of the old
organization. Informal relationships between Global Mobile's
veteran employees formed the
backbone of the firm's day-to-day operations; all managers
relied on personal contact, and
Hoover often insisted that the absence of bureaucratic red tape
was a key factor in recruiting
outstanding engineering talent. This personal approach to
management extended throughout
18. the organization. All exempt employees were paid a straight
salary and a share of the profits.
Global Mobile boasted an extremely loyal group of senior
employees, and very low turnover
in nearly all areas of the company.
The highest turnover job in the firm was director of engineering
services. Newburg had
joined Global Mobile in January 2010, replacing Jim Brady,
who had lasted only ten months.
Brady, in turn, had replaced Tom Swanson, a talented engineer
who had made a promising
start but had taken to drinking after a year in the job. Swanson's
predecessor had been a genial
old-timer, who retired at 70 after 25 years in charge of
engineering. (Doc Brown had refused
the directorship in each of the recent changes, saying, “Hell,
that's no promotion for a bench
man like me. I'm no administrator.”)
For several years, the firm had experienced a steadily
increasing number of disputes
between product development, engineering, sales, and
19. production people that generally
centered on the problem of new-product introduction. Quarrels
between departments became
more numerous under Swanson, Brady, and Newburg. Some
managers associated these
disputes with the company's recent decline in profitability—a
decline that, despite higher
sales and gross revenues, was beginning to bother people.
Hoover commented:
o Better cooperation, I'm sure, could increase our output by 5 to
10%. I'd hoped Brady could
solve the problems, but pretty obviously he was too young—too
arrogant. People like
him—that conflict type of personality—bother me. I don't like
strife, and with him it
seemed I spent all my time smoothing out arguments. Brady
tried to tell everyone else how
to run their departments, without having his own house in order.
That approach just
wouldn't work, here at Global Mobile. Charlie Newburg, now,
seems much more in tune
with our style of organization. I'm really hopeful now. Still,
we have just as many
problems now as we did last year. Maybe even more. I hope
20. Charlie can get a handle on
engineering services soon.
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT: PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
According to the organization chart Newburg was in charge of
both product development (the
applied research and design function) and engineering services
(engineering support). To
Newburg, however, the relationship with design was not so
clear-cut:
o Doc Brown is one of the world's unique people, and none of
us would have it any other
way. He's a creative genius. Sure, the chart says he works for
me, but we all know Doc
does his own thing. He's not the least bit interested in
management routines, and I can't
count on him to take any responsibility in scheduling projects,
or checking budgets, or
what-have you. But as long as Doc is director of product
development, you can bet this
company will keep on leading the field. He has more ideas per
hour than most people have
per year, and he keeps the whole engineering staff fired up.
21. Everybody loves Doc—and
you can count me in on that, too. In a way, he works for me,
sure. But that's not what's
important.
Doc Brown—unhurried, contemplative, casual, and candid—
tipped his stool back against
the wall of his research cubicle and talked about what was
important:
o Hardware and structural design engineering. That's where the
company's future rests.
Either we have it there, or we don't have it. There's no kidding
ourselves that we're
anything but a bunch of Rube Goldbergs here. But that's where
the biggest kicks come
from—from solving development problems and dreaming up
new ways of doing things.
That's why I so look forward to the new designs we get involved
in. We accept them not
for the revenue they represent but because they subsidize the
basic development work that
goes into all our basic mobile phone products. This is a
fantastic place to work. I have a
22. great crew and they can really deliver when the chips are down.
Why, Hannah Hoover and
I (he gestured toward the neighboring cubicle, where the
president's name hung over the
door) are likely to find as many people here at work at 10 P.M.
as at 3 P.M. The important
thing here is the relationships between people; they're based on
mutual respect, not on
policies and procedures. Administrative red tape is a pain. It
takes away from development
time. Problems? Sure, there are problems now and then. There
are power interests in
production, where they sometimes resist change. But I'm not a
fighting man you know. I
suppose if I were, I might go in there and push my weight
around a little. But I'm an
engineer, and can do more for Global Mobile sitting right here,
or working with my own
people. That's what brings results.
Other members of the product development department echoed
these views and added
additional sources of satisfaction from their work. They were
proud of the personal contacts
23. built with customers' technical staffs—contacts that
increasingly involved project work as
expert advisors in thinking through operational problems like
international compatibility,
interoperability issues between carriers, next generation
technologies, and so on. The
engineers were also delighted with the department's
encouragement of their personal
development, continuing education, and independence on the
job.
But there were problems, too. Shawn Reynolds, of the
structural design group, noted:
o In the old days I really enjoyed the work—and the people I
worked with. But now there's a
lot of irritation. I don't like someone breathing down my neck.
You can be hurried into
jeopardizing the design.
Philip Sanchez, head of the hardware design section, was
another designer with definite
views:
o Production engineering is almost nonexistent in this company.
Very little is done by the
pre-production section in engineering services. Charlie
Newburg has been trying to get
24. preproduction into the picture, but he won't succeed because
you can't start from such an
ambiguous position. There have been three directors of
engineering in three years. Charlie
can't hold his own against the others in the company. Brady was
too aggressive. Perhaps
no amount of tact would have succeeded.
Paul Hodgetts was head of special components in the R&D
department. Like the rest of the
department, he valued engineering design work. But he
complained of engineering services:
o The services don't do things we want them to do. Instead, they
tell us what they're going to
do. I should probably go to Charlie, but I don't get any
decisions there. I know I should go
through Charlie, but this holds things up, so I often go direct.
ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
The engineering services department (ESD) provided ancillary
and support services to R&D
and served as liaison between engineering and the other Global
25. Mobile departments. Among
its main functions were the maintenance of the design systems,
simple and advanced
prototyping, management of the central technicians' pool,
scheduling and expediting
engineering products, documentation and publication of parts
lists and engineering orders,
preproduction engineering (consisting of the final integration of
individual design
components into mechanically compatible packages), and
quality control (including
inspection of incoming parts and materials, and final inspection
of subassemblies and finished
equipment). The original description of the department included
the line, “ESD is responsible
for maintaining cooperation with other departments, providing
services to the design
engineers, and freeing the more valuable people in R&D from
essential activities that are
diversions from their main focus.”
Many of the 75 ESD employees were located in other
departments and locations. Quality
control people, for example, were scattered through the
manufacturing and receiving areas of
26. the Asian plant, and technicians worked primarily in the
research area or the prototype
fabrication room. The remaining ESD personnel were assigned
to leftover nooks and crannies
near the engineering sections. Newburg described his position:
o My biggest problem is getting acceptance from the people I
work with. I've moved slowly
rather than risk antagonism. I saw what happened to Brady, and
I want to avoid that. But
although his decisiveness had won over a few of the younger
R&D people, he certainly
didn't have the department's backing. Of course, it was the
resentment of other departments
that eventually caused his discharge. People have been slow
accepting me here. There's
nothing really overt, but I get a negative reaction to my ideas.
My role in the company
has never been well-defined, really. It's complicated by Doc's
unique position, of course,
and also by the fact that ESD sort of grew by itself over the
years, as the design engineers
concentrated more and more on the creative parts of product
27. development. I wish I could
be more involved in the technical side. That's been my training,
and it's a lot of fun. But in
our setup, the technical side is the least necessary for me to be
involved in. Wang is hard
to get along with. Before I came and after Brady left, there were
six months when no one
was really doing any scheduling. No workloads were figured,
and unrealistic promises
were made about releases. This puts us in an awkward position.
We've been scheduling
way beyond our capacity to manufacture or engineer. Certain
people within R&D, for
instance Philip Sanchez, understand scheduling well and meet
project deadlines, but this is
not generally true of the rest of the R&D department, especially
the design engineers, who
won't commit themselves. Most of the complaints come from
sales and production
department heads because new products, such as the
Nonphixhun, are going to production
before they are fully developed, under pressure from sales to get
out the unit, and this
snags the whole process. Somehow, engineering services should
28. be able to intervene and
resolve these complaints, but I haven't made much headway so
far.640 641 I should be able
to go to Hoover for help, but she's too busy most of the time,
and her major interest is the
design side of engineering, where she got her own start.
Sometimes she talks as though
she's the engineering director as well as president. I have to put
my foot down; there are
problems here that the front office just doesn't understand.
Salespeople were often observed taking their problems directly
to designers, while production
frequently threw designs back at R&D, claiming they could not
be produced and demanding
the prompt attention of particular design engineers. The latter
were frequently observed in
video conference with production supervisors from the assembly
floor. Charlie continued:
o The designers seem to feel they're losing something when one
of us tries to help. They feel
it's a reflection on them to have someone take over what they've
been doing. They seem to
want to carry a project right through to the final stages.
29. Consequently, engineering services
people are used below their capacity to contribute, and our
department is denied functions
it should be performing. There's not as much use made of
engineering services as there
should be.
An ESD technician supervisor added his comments:
o Production picks out the engineer who'll be the “bum of the
month.” They pick on every
little detail instead of using their heads and making the minor
changes that have to be
made. The people with 15 to 20 years of experience shouldn't
have to prove their ability
any more, but they spend four hours defending themselves and
four hours getting the job
done. I have no one to go to when I need help. Charlie Newburg
is afraid. I'm trying to
help him but he can't help me at this time. I'm responsible for
25 people and I've got to
support them.
Roxanne Walsh, who Newburg had brought with him to the
30. company as an assistant, gave
another view of the situation:
o I try to get our people in preproduction to take responsibility
but they're not used to it, and
people in other departments don't usually see them as best
qualified to solve the problem.
There's a real barrier for a newcomer here. Gaining people's
confidence is hard. More and
more, I'm wondering whether there really is a job for me here.
[Walsh left Global Mobile a
month later.]
Another subordinate of Newburg gave his view:
o If Doc gets a new product idea, you can't argue. But he's too
optimistic. He judges that
others can do what he does—but there's only one Doc Brown.
We've had over 500
production change orders this year—they changed 2,500
documents. If I were in Charlie's
shoes, I'd put my foot down on all this new development. I'd
look at the reworking we're
doing and get production set up the way I wanted it. Brady was
fired when he was doing a
good job. He was getting some system in the company's
31. operations. Of course, it hurt
some people. There is no denying that Doc is the most important
person in the company.
What gets overlooked is that Hoover is a close second, not just
politically but in terms of
what she contributes technically and in customer relations.
Production personnel said that Brady had failed to show respect
for old-timers and was
always meddling in other departments' business. This was the
reason for his being fired, they
contended. Taylor Flores, in charge of quality control,
commented:
o I am now much more concerned with administration and less
with work. It is one of the
evils you get into. There is tremendous detail in this job. I listen
to everyone's opinion.
Everybody is important. There shouldn't be distinctions—
distinctions between people. I'm
not sure whether Charlie has to be a fireball like Brady. I think
the real question is whether
Charlie is getting the job done. I know my job is essential, I
want to supply service to the
more talented people and give them information so they can do
32. their jobs better.
SALES DEPARTMENT
Marianne Price was angry. Her job was supposed to be selling,
but instead it had turned into
settling disputes and making excuses to waiting customers. She
pointed a finger toward her
desk:
o You see that telephone? I'm actually afraid nowadays to hear
it ring. Three times out of
five, it will be a customer who's hurting because we've failed to
deliver on schedule. The
other two calls will be from production or ESD, telling me some
schedule has slipped
again. The Nonphixhun is typical. Absolutely typical. We
padded the delivery date by six
weeks to allow for contingencies. Within two months, the slack
had evaporated. Now it
looks like we'll be lucky to ship it before Christmas. (It was
now November 28.)
33. We're ruining our reputation in the market. Why, just last week
one of our best
customers—people we've worked with for 15 years—tried to
hang a penalty clause on
their latest order. We shouldn't have to be after the engineers
all the time. They should be
able to see what problems they create without our telling them.
Phil Klein, head of mobile phone sales under Price, noted that
many sales decisions were
made by top management. He thought that sales was
understaffed and had never really been
able to get on top of the job.
o We have grown further and further away from engineering.
The director of engineering
does not pass on the information that we give him. We need
better relationships there. It is
very difficult for us to talk to customers about development
problems without technical
help. We need each other. The whole of engineering is now too
isolated from the outside
world. The morale of ESD is very low. They're in a bad spot—
they're not well-
organized. People don't take much to outsiders here. Much of
34. this is because the
expectation is built by top management that jobs will be filled
from the bottom. So it's
really tough when an outsider like Charlie comes in.
Eric Norman, order and pricing coordinator for smart phones,
talked about his relationships
with the production department:
o Actually, I get along with them fairly well. Oh, things could
be better, of course, if they
were more cooperative generally. They always seem to say, “It's
my bat and my ball, and
we're playing by my rules.” People are afraid to make
production mad; there's a lot of
power in there. But you've got to understand that production
has its own set of problems.
And nobody in Global Mobile is working any harder than Tyson
Wang to try to straighten
things out.
PRODUCTION DEPARTMENT
Wang had joined Global Mobile just after the Iraq War where he
35. had seen some combat and
worked a stint in the intelligence organization. Both experiences
had been useful in his first
year of civilian employment at Global Mobile. The former
factory superintendent and several
middle managers had apparently been engaging in highly
questionable side deals with Global
Mobile's suppliers. Wang gathered the evidence, revealed the
situation to Hoover, and stood
by the president as the accusations and terminations ensued.
Seven months after joining the
company, Wang was named factory manager.
Wang's first move had been to rebuild the factory team with
new people from outside the
corporation. This group did not share the traditional Global
Mobile emphasis on informality
and friendly personal relationships and had worked long and
hard to install systematic
manufacturing methods and procedures. Before the
reorganization, production had controlled
purchasing, stock control, and final quality control. Because of
the scandal, management
decided on a check-and-balance system of organization and
moved these three departments
36. from production to ESD. The new production managers felt they
had been unjustly penalized
by this reorganization, particularly since they had uncovered the
behavior that was
detrimental to the company in the first place.
By 2007, the production department had grown to 500
employees, of whom 60% worked in
the assembly area—an unusually pleasant environment that had
been commended
by Factory magazine for its colorful decoration, cleanliness, and
low noise level. Another
30% of the work force, mostly skilled technicians, staffed
various production support
departments. The remaining employees performed scheduling,
supervisory, 642643 and
maintenance duties. Production workers were not union
members, were paid by the hour, and
participated in both the liberal profit-sharing program and the
stock purchase plan. Morale in
production was traditionally high and turnover was extremely
low.
Wang commented:
o To be efficient, production has to be a self-contained
37. department. We have to control what
comes into the department and what goes out. That's why
purchasing, inventory control,
and quality ought to run out of this office. We'd eliminate a lot
of problems with better
control there. Why, even Taylor Flores of QC would rather work
for me than for ESD; he's
said so himself. We understand his problems better. The other
departments should be
self-contained, too. That's why I always avoid the underlings,
and go straight to the
department heads with any questions. I always go down the line.
I have to protect my
people from outside disturbances. Look what would happen if I
let unfinished half-baked
designs in here—there'd be chaos. The bugs have to be found
before the designs go to
parts manufacturers and into assembly, and it seems I'm the one
who has to find them.
Look at the Nonphixhun, for example. [Tyson had spent most of
Thanksgiving Day (it was
now November 28) reviewing the latest set of specifications
from the system.] ESD should
38. have found every one of those discrepancies. They just don't
check the files properly. They
change most of the things I flag, but then they fail to trace
through the impact of those
changes on the rest of the design. I shouldn't have to do that.
And those engineers are
tolerance crazy. They want everything manufactured and
assembled to a thousandth of an
inch. I'm the only one in the company who's had any experience
at that level. We make
sure that the things that engineers say on their drawings actually
have to be that way and
whether they're obtainable from the kind of raw materials and
parts we use. That
shouldn't be production's responsibility, but I have to do it.
Accepting bad designs and
documentation wouldn't let us ship the order any quicker. We'd
only make a lot of junk
that had to be reworked. And that would take even longer. This
way, I get to be known as
the bad guy, but I guess that's just part of the job. [Wang paused
and smiled wryly.] Of
course, what really gets them is that I don't even have a degree.
39. Wang had fewer bones to pick with the sales department,
because he said that they trusted
him.
o When we give Marianne Price a shipping date, she knows the
equipment will be
shipped then. You've got to recognize, though, that all of our
new product problems stem
from sales making absurd commitments on equipment that hasn't
been fully developed.
That always means trouble. Unfortunately, Hoover always backs
sales up, even when
they're wrong. She always favors them over us.
Ralph Simon, executive vice-president of the company, had
direct responsibility for Global
Mobile's production department. He said:
o There shouldn't really be a dividing of departments among top
management in the
company. The president should be czar over all. The production
people ask me to do
something for them, and I really can't do it. It creates bad
feelings between engineering
and production, this special attention that they [R&D] get from
Hannah. But then Hoover
40. likes to dabble in design. Wang feels that production is treated
like a poor relation.
PRODUCT RELEASE
At the executive committee meeting of December 6, it was duly
recorded that Wang had
accepted the prints and specifications for the Nonphixhun smart
phone and had set December
29 as the shipping date for the first 100 phones. Hoover, as
chairperson, shook her head and
changed the subject quickly when Newburg tried to initiate a
discussion of interdepartmental
coordination.
About a week later, Hoover called Newburg into her office.
o Charlie, I didn't know whether to tell you now, or after the
holiday. But I figured you'd
work right through Christmas Day if we didn't have this talk,
and that just wouldn't have
been fair to you. I can't understand why we have such poor luck
in the engineering
director's job lately. And I don't think it's entirely your fault.
41. But.…
Charlie only heard half of Hoover's words, and said nothing in
response. He'd be paid
through June 30. He should use the time for searching.…
Hoover would help all she could.…
Jim Brady was supposed to be doing well at his own new job,
and might need more help.
Charlie cleaned out his desk and numbly started home. The
electronic carillon near his
house was playing a Christmas carol. Charlie thought again of
Hoover's rationale: conflict
still plagued Global Mobile—and Charlie had not made it go
away. Maybe somebody else
could do it.
Questions
o 1. What is your diagnosis of the strategy and organization
design at Global Mobile? How well does Global Mobile's
strategic intent fit with its external environment?
o 2. How would you work with Hannah Hoover and the
executive committee to bring about strategic change at
Global Mobile?
*
42. This case is an adaptation and revision of Rondell Data
Corporation, by John A. Seeger, Professor of
Management at Bentley College, Waltham, MA, 1981.
1
ENGL 1213
Annotated Bibliography (10%)
Draft* due: Wednesday, October 2nd to the online drop box by
8:00am.
Bring a physical or digital copy to class.
Final due: Friday, October 4th to the online drop-box by
8:00am.
Instructions:
Write a brief explanation of your research topic and create an
annotated bibliography for at least
6 secondary sources. (A source could be a relevant chapter in a
book—you would not need to
43. read or annotate the entire book).
*The draft must include the explanation (Part 1) and at least 4
citations and annotations.
Part 1. Write a brief explanation of your topic (at least 5
sentences).
Identify your:
Part 2. Create an end citation page
(an MLA Works Cited Page, Chicago Style Bibliography, or
APA Reference Page).
Under each citation write a brief annotation—a summary (at
least 175 words).
Each annotation should include:
1. The type of source (scholarly, blog post, interview)
2. The writer/publisher’s credentials
3. A summary of the main arguments or information
4. The types of evidence, data, and/or sources referenced
44. 5. Your assessment/interpretation of the source (the
effectiveness of its argument or use
of data etc.)
6. The relevancy of the argument or information to your own
project (how will you use
this source—as evidence, as counterargument, etc.)
2
Format:
New Roman font
liographies should be written within one proper citation
format.
-box as word
documents
(.doc or .docx)
Bibliography.doc).
45. Grading Criteria:
subject
to the subject matter
or your own
research project
each source
study—ie. newspapers,
academic journals, case studies, etc.)
46. (Complete rubric on next page)
3
Rubric:
An A bibliography
will fully explain the research topic: clearly identifying the
genre, research
questions, and initial goals for the project. (at least 5 sentences)
Citations will follow consistent format: MLA, APA, or Chicago
Style.
Each summary will contextualize the source and its author(s),
clearly identify its
main points, and its methodology.
Annotations will state the writer’s stance toward the source and
its relevance to
47. the writer’s project.
There will be no citation errors and few grammatical errors.
A B bibliography
will explain the research topic: identifying the genre, research
questions, and
initial goals for the project. (at least 5 sentences).
Citations will follow consistent format: MLA, APA, or Chicago
Style.
Each annotation will contextualize the source and its author(s),
clearly identify its
main points and its methodology.
Most annotations will state the writer’s stance toward the source
and its relevance
to the writer’s project.
There will be no citation errors and few grammatical errors.
48. A C bibliography will identifying the genre, and may include
research questions or initial goals for
the project. (at least 3-5 sentences).
Citations will mostly follow consistent format: MLA, APA, or
Chicago Style.
Most annotations will contextualize the source and its author(s),
clearly identify
its main points and its methodology.
Annotations will suggest the writer’s stance toward the source
and may include
the relevance to the writer’s project.
There will be few citation errors and grammatical errors.
A D or F bibliography will have an incomplete explanation of
the topic.
Citations may not fully follow a consistent format: MLA, APA,
or Chicago Style.
Annotations will partially contextualize the source.
49. Citation errors and grammatical errors will be present.
1
ENG 1213
Essay 1: Textual Analysis (15%)
Draft due to the online drop box Wednesday, September 4th by
8:00am
Also bring a physical or digital copy to class.
Final essay due: Friday, September 6th to the online drop-box
by 8:00am
A textual analysis essay offers critical interpretations of a text
(written, visual, and sonic
communication) by explaining its meaning through close
examination and unique insight.
Instructions:
Develop a textual analysis essay that examines a single text or
group of related texts (a literary
50. work, artistic or commercial image, song lyrics, television
episode, or film) and offers your own
insight and interpretations. Your essay should present a clearly
defined thesis that offers an
original interpretive claim about its subject.
Essays should:
critical thinking and knowledge of the text(s)
Note: For this essay you will only be using primary sources (the
texts themselves). You may not
use any secondary sources (any outside source including
summaries, descriptions, or reviews).
Format:
Roman font
-1,200 words (approximately 3-4 pages)
-box as
word documents
(.doc or .docx)
52. An A essay
will present a clearly defined thesis statement, which is
supported throughout the
essay by insightful interpretations. The introduction will
contextualize the subject
and emphasize the writer’s analytical thesis. Body paragraphs
will begin with
specific topic sentences that support one main point of the
writer’s thesis. Textual
evidence will demonstrate the writer’s critical understanding of
the text, which will
be fully explained. A conclusion will reestablish the writer’s
thesis by stating the
significance of the essay’s analysis. There will be few to no
grammatical errors or
typos.
A B essay
will present a thesis statement, which is supported throughout
the essay by
interpretative claims. The introduction will establish the thesis.
53. Body paragraphs will
contain one main idea supporting the thesis. Textual evidence
will suggest the
writer’s analysis. The conclusion will reestablish the thesis, but
may not suggest the
significance or relevance of the essay. Grammatical errors or
typos will not hinder
the clarity of the writer’s essay.
A C essay will suggest the writer’s position on the subject,
though the thesis may be
undeveloped or not established within the introduction.
Descriptions or summaries of
text(s) may not be fully analyzed by the writer. Grammatical
errors and typos hinder
the clarity of the writer’s essay.
A D or F essay will summarize the text without offering original
analysis. The introduction, body,
and conclusion paragraphs may not be fully formed.
Grammatical errors and typos
may hinder the clarity of the writer’s essay.
54. 3
Word Count: The minimum word count is 900 words.
899-860 words up to 4% will be deducted from the final grade
859-800 words 5% will be deducted from the final grade
799-750 words 10% will be deducted from the final grade
749-700 words 15% will be deducted from the final grade
699-650 words 20% will be deducted from the final grade
649-600 words 25% will be deducted from the final grade
599-550 words 30% will be deducted from the final grade
549-500 words 35% will be deducted from the final grade
449 words or less The essay will not be accepted.
Finish the essay and submit it with a late grade penalty -
3%/day.