An Analysis Of The Interactive Violence Of The...

An Analysis of the Interactive Violence of the...
For the last sixty years, the Palestinians and Israelis have been involved in a nearly non–stop game
of tag, except this form of tag involves suicide bombers, Qassam rockets, hell fire missiles and
tanks. This paper will examine how public opinion has affected the intricacies of this game of tag
and attempt to prove that no matter who leads the Israeli government, the response to Palestinian
aggression has always been violence in one degree or another. There are only two major Israeli
political parties that have ever been able to garner enough votes in the Knesset to either have enough
to have a super majority or to be the main player in a coalition. The Jewish Labor party was formed
in 1968 when the leftist groups, the Mapai, Adhut ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Under the Labor Party, the Oslo Accord Declaration of Principle on Interim Self–Government
Arrangements, the Cairo Agreement on Palestinian Self–Rule in Gaza and Jericho, and Oslo II were
signed, which were two landmark agreements in which Israel and the PLO recognized each side's
right to exist and not to do anything that would lead to aggression or violence. (However, because of
domestic politics, both sides have continued to engage in violence.) In letters from Yitzhak Rabin
and Yasir Arafat, they recognize each other and their right to exist. Within the agreed minutes to the
Principles on Self–Government, they promise not to do anything that would cause violence. This is
also repeated in the Cairo Agreement. Specifically, this is listed in Article XII of the Cairo
Agreement, which states that "Israel and the Palestinian Authority shall seek to foster mutual
understanding and tolerance and shall accordingly abstain from incitement, including hostile
propaganda, against each other." The Labor Party is in favor of dismantling illegal outposts. Amir
Peretz told the Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz on December 27, 2005 that "The outposts (settlements
built without formal permission by the Israeli government) are damaging Israel's image as a lawful
state. While Sharon continues funneling resources to the outposts he ignores the periphery towns,
the Negev and the Galiee." The Labor Party also is in favor of freezing
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

The Israeli Palestinian Conflict Of Palestine Essay
115,000 is the total estimated number of civilians, armed forces, and others involved killed since the
start of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict in the late 19th century. Throughout the past several decades
the Israeli Zionists and Palestinian natives have fought over a section of land in the Middle East for
recognition as an independent or bi–national country. This has led to a war in which a peaceful
solution, and not just managing the problem but attempting to end the problem is paramount. The
history of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict begins around 1880 whenever the original Zionist
movement, creation of a homeland for Jews in Palestine, was first formed and thousands of Jews
migrated to the then Ottoman Empire occupied Palestine. At the end of World War I, in 1918, the
British controlled the Palestine area and encouraged Jewish migration to the newly British mandated
Palestine. Throughout the following years, up to 1939, violent riots or revolts, depending on who
was describing them, would break out killing many. After World War II ended, and the United
Nations was formed, in 1947 the U.N. gathered the General Assembly to attempt to solve the
problems in Palestine creating two separate states, one for Jews and another for Arabs. War breaks
out as the nearby Arab states reject the plan. When the war ended 700,000 Palestinians fled, Jordan
controlled the West Bank and east Jerusalem, and Egypt controlled the Gaza Strip (Shikhmanter).
In the following two decades small

How Intifada Affected the Peace Process in the Middle East...
The First Intifada changed the direction of the peace process and affected every Palestinians' life.
The Intifada was a mass movement against the Israeli authority through boycotts, civil disobedience
and general strikes. Israel reacted to the Intifada by deploying 80,000 troops to stop the uprising by
"breaking Palestinians' bones"[Footnote]. The Oslo Accords were signed by both Israel and
Palestine to end the Intifada and create a stable peace which gave Palestinians freedom and Israelis
security. The Palestinian Liberation Organisation was recognised by Israel and to represent the
Palestinian people in future summits. The accords failed to give either country what they desired and
were never a final solution to the Middle East Crisis. Due to the failure of the Oslo accords and
subsequent agreements the Palestinian people marched in protest of worsening conditions. The
Second Intifada came soon after the failure of the Camp David Summit suggesting the "lack of a
political solution results in increased tension and outbursts of violence". The peace process was
hugely aided by the Intifada as the First Oslo Accord was agree to end the rebellion. The uprising
was primarily a reaction to the killing of four Palestinians but developed into a countrywide
demonstration after more were killed at the funerals by Israeli troops. They demanded an end to
Israel's control over 'occupied territories'. If the Palestinians were granted this it would increase "the
likelihood of a

Intifada And The Bermuda Triangles
The first intifada was sparked by the death of four palestines in december 1987 by the time it ended
over one thousand people had died and sixteen thousands people had been detained. Palestinians had
already spent two decades struggling with the injustice of living under Israeli occupation. Intifada
was the first time palestinians from all over the society began such an intense resistance . the
protests evolved from boys throwing rocks to fighters attacking Israeli soldiers and military targets.
Palestinians went on a strike and boycott Israeli products. Intifada was called by a number of groups
affiliated with a palestinian liberation organization or the PLO. The group Hamas stepped in as well
arguing that armed resistance was the only

Conflicting Narratives Of The Israeli Palestinian Conflict
Conflicting narratives in the Israeli Palestinian conflict
Any reference to conflict turns history into a reservoir of blame. In the presence of conflict,
narratives differ and multiply to delegitimize the opponent and to justify one's own action.
Narratives shape social knowledge. The Israeli Palestinian conflict, both Jews and Muslims, view
the importance of holding the territories through religious, ideological, and security lenses, based on
belief that Palestine was given by divine providence and that the land belongs to either the Israelis
or Palestinian's ancestral home. Understanding these perspectives is required for understanding
Palestinians' and especially Israel's strategy and role in entering the Oslo peace process. Despite ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
To show examples how conflicting narratives affected the Oslo peace process, conflicting narratives
stemming from collective memories will be applied to issues regarding security, history, and social
identity.
Security narrative
A narrative based on collective memory is difficult to deconstruct and functions as a barrier to
negotiations. Given that narratives play an important role in determining the flow of the negotiations
and that every new generation on both sides is raised with this narrative of insecurity in mind, the
gap of conflict is widened through a hardening of attitudes amplified by the delay of resolving the
stalemate. Connecting the gap to security arguments, the gap is further widened when collective
memory functions as the key in altering the status quo especially in asymmetrical conflict where the
weaker group fears the total domination of the other and contests the imbalance by resorting to
violence. A clash in security narratives is seen: Palestinians justify their violent actions by trying to
balance out with Israel claiming that they feel powerless and fear the loss of dignity, while Israelis
justify their actions citing issues of threat and security. As seen in the eruption of the second
intifada, Palestinian riots occurred after events that affected their sense of security. First, Ariel
Sharon's visit to the Temple Mount reminded the Palestinians of their claim over East Jerusalem and
saw Sharon's visit

Divine Intervention By Elia Suleiman
Palestinian identity has lasted the test of time through exile, diaspora, and attempts at cultural
white–washing. It is through these situations that Palestine has created a unique sense of identity,
unlike many nation–states. The Palestinian identity has come to transcend borders, nationality, and
mediums. It is not only represented in politics and protest, but in personal expression and the arts.
This paper argues that both national identity and cultural productions of Palestine represent the
diaspora through noticeable adaptation based on location and support the idea that Palestinian
identity isn't singularly definable. The first piece of evidence that I will analyze is the movie Divine
Intervention (2002), directed by Elia Suleiman. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
One particularly interesting perspective is his opinion on how the conflict has somewhat freed the
identity of Palestinians from a shared land, and that for some Palestinians that can escape the
occupation, there is a the creation of a transnational, transgressive life. (Suleiman, 2003, 73) Thus
exists multiple outcomes from one identity. He further supports this by commenting that Palestine
does not have borders, does not actually exist in the sense of geography, but it still has a sense of
space. The Palestinian people are this space, and the people are how we define what is, and what is
not Palestine. People are separated geographically, but defined by identity and community, and this
creates a unique sense of freedom outside of a defined nation–state. (Suleiman, 2000, 96) This lets
the definition of this identity be more fluid. He says that in his work he purposefully moves away
from a centralized view of Palestinian identity and uses cinema to present the differences in
viewpoint, perception, and narration that exist within this conflict. Not only between Israelis and
Palestinian's but between all Palestinian's. (Suleiman, 2000, 97) He purposefully moves away from a
singular form of Palestinian identity and states "My films are Palestinian because I am Palestinian."
(Suleiman, 2000, 99) This movement from a

Film Analysis : Paradise Now
Paradise Now is a 2–hour film released in 2005, it depicts a perspective alternative in a highly
controversial topic of suicide bombers or also known as a 'martyr'. The movie takes place in
Palestine during the Israeli occupation and illustrates the mundane life and frustration felt by the
main characters Said and Khaled due to the oppression experienced during the conflict. A key
feature that is also portrayed is the reasoning, and almost justification of an attack on that level.
However, the perpatrators can be seen showing feelings of hesitance and even inquisitiveness in
relation to the afterlife that they are promised and whether violent resistance is the last option. This
paper, will discuss how "Paradise Now" provoked my views and ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Furthermore, the Israeli occupation of Palestine that the film depicts is a part of the 2000–2005
second intifada between the two nations (Manekin, 2013). Nablus, in Palestine is where Said and
Khaled are based, and the mission is to take place in Tel Aviv across the border. A noticeable feature
of the movie is the concept of deadness, the two main characters are not suicidal but the life they are
trapped in has created a sense of them being dead already (Nashef, 2016) this is represented by the
oppression and the lack of opportunity that is present. This theme can be further seen in their town –
Nablus. Due to the conflict, the landscape and infrastructure is bleak, destroyed and very much
discarded. The depiction of the lifestyle experienced during that period of conflict, highlighted to me
potential motivations.
Additionally, to understand terrorism, we must understand the motivations. In the 21st century, it is
fair to say that many organisations are religiously and politically motivated. Which are primary
observations from the film as well, however what is also manifested in the storyline is the idea of
personal vendettas or struggles, honour and the need for recognition. What I have learnt this
semester is that along with the interpretations of Islam, there are many diverse people, who are then
motivated differently. In week 3 for example one of the readings discussed child radicalisation, and
most definitely these children are

Second Intifada
In the second Intifada, which lasted from 2000 to 2005, Palestinians were shown regularly to be
"appearing in a variety of new roles." "Israeli journalists, in both the electronic and the printed press,
conducted interviews on a regular basis with political leaders, ordinary people, and even terrorists."
(Liebes & Kampf, 2009) what happened to the reasons listed above as to why Israeli media did not
shed much light on Palestinians. It went from "protecting the public from seeing death" to now
interviewing so called "terrorists". This is a drastic change from what was seen in the 1st intifada.
The authors talk about their reasons as to why these changes took place. Among these reasons is the
easy access to photo and video technologies, and the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
There has been certain periods where it would vary throughout the decade but generally, it was more
balanced. When the first intifada started in 1987, the author claimed that up towards end of 2001,
coverage was increasingly becoming pro–Israeli. "Specifically, the newspaper has used a higher
percentage of Israeli sources and more Israeli end quotes and personalized Israeli deaths more than
Palestinian deaths." (Elmasry, 2010). The author goes on to discuss the methods used by news
articles that make them pro–Israeli rather than balanced. Among those reasons is the old "self–
defence" claims. Another reason used is claiming "it was an accident". An example of this is "The
Israeli army attacked a Palestinian militia leader with a helicopter gunship Thursday, missing him
but killing two others." (Dellios, 2001) another more recent example occurred during the 2014 war
on Gaza when the Israeli military launched missiles on a beach killing 4 boys who were playing
soccer. "The boys were killed in full view of a hotel filled with foreign correspondents reporting on
the conflict, which led to harrowing first–hand accounts of the attack." (2015) the author spends a
portion of the paper talking about the justification news articles use to legitimize Israel's actions but
that will be covered in the final

An Article ' An Officer And A Muslim Zionist '
Sebastyne Young has said, "A picture can tell a thousand words, but a few words can change its
story" (Young). In 2012 Ala Wahib posed for what he thought would be an ordinary picture however
the image became extraordinary due to its inclusion in an article titled "An officer and a Muslim
Zionist". It is important that at first glance it is not clear that the officer is a Muslim because it
counters a stereotype that all Muslims look alike or that Muslims are at war with Jews. In the article
Wahib is asked about how he feels about being the highest ranking Muslim officer in the Israeli
army and a Zionist. The illustration of a Muslim soldier in the IDF is a great example of how images
can have varying interpretations based on ones perspective. There is a problem in the modern world
with the way we look and understand images having to do with Islam. Efforts taken by the media to
share images which creates a positive perspective on Islam, are rare. Instead images that cause the
public to connect Muslims to terror and radicalism are common because the media utilizes
punctum's such as, an image of a young victim of a terror attack, to tap into ones emotions, gaining
the public's attention. the reason why the media cares about increasing their audience is because the
world revolves around money and unfortunately the world has become so used to opening up the
newspaper in the morning and seeing negative images, that positive images don't appeal to media
moguls. An important

Israel-Palestine
Israel–Palestine
Introduction
In the absence of peace, there is conflict. This might lead to war between countries if conflict is not
handled carefully. Today it is almost a norm to see countries engaging others in war. Today the
greatest problem facing many nations is international relation. Countries have failed to live like
decent neighbors. There is disunity among many nations. War between nations is caused by mistrust
and tension. Nations purchase arms to stock their armory. Major inventions are made daily in out on
nuclear power and how to develop sophiscated weapons. This tries to explain the fact that countries
are always in mistrust of each other. It also explains that there is constant tension between countries
that one ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
As times progressed there was an uprising in Lebanon as the Palestinian opposed Israel rule, In 1978
Palestine attacked Hezbollah. Israel felt invaded and led an offensive attack o Lebanon. Israel
attacked Lebanon and went as far as capturing Beirut. The prime target was to bomb Yasser Arafat
locations. During this invasion, Israel declared southern Lebanon as a security zone. During these
attacks, there were deaths on both sides. The greatest casualties were the children. Israel came to
withdraw its security forces from southern Lebanon in May 2000. Another serious crisis came to be
in 1980s. This was the intifada. A group of young Palestinians confronted Israeli troops with sling
shots and stones. The outcome was not acceptable and many of the youth were shot dead. To lay an
offensive attack, the Palestinians used suicide bombers to kill the Israeli troops. Many innocent
civilians were killed from both sides.
In 1993 the Oslo peace accord was made. In this accord Israel accepted to recognize the Palestinian
liberal organisation (PLO). They were also to give the PLO limited autonomy. The conditions were
that PLO were to end a Palestinian claims on Israel territory. The accord was met with different
reaction across the world. It was seen as a one sided accord which favored only the Israelites. The
accord gave Israel the control of land, water, roads and other resources. This accord was seen as
only

The Genzanian Genocide And The Rwandan Genocide
The Rwandan Genocide took place for in 1994 where the Hutus began to massacre the Tutsis due to
many years of oppression aided by Belgian influences. While the Palestinian Genocide occurred
between 1947–1948 and Zionists wished to overtake Palestinian land and remove all Arab
influences while expanding upon their territory. Yet, the Rwandan Genocide and the Palestinian
Genocide had a distinguished similarity; to ethnically cleanse the land. Post WWII, Jew's wished for
land separate from European Anti–Semitic beliefs. The Holocaust had further pushed Zionists
agenda to take Palestine due to their historical and religious background within the land. Thus, a
significant amount of Jews from Europe and America called for a separate Jewish state. During this
time, Britain had a mandate over Palestine and were authorized to rule the land. However, given that
the dispute was becoming increasingly controversial, the British withdrew from the conflict and
gave authority of the land to the UN. Then the UN had formed the UNSCOP, United Nation Special
Committee on Palestine. Their objective was to separate Jewish and Arab land. There the UN
authorized the Israeli state and caused the displacement of thousands of Palestinians. They had
forced the Palestinians to flee their villages in order to place arriving Jewish settlers. Various tactics
were used to remove Palestinians from the land. For instance. Israelis used arab radio broadcasts to
inhibit fear within the arab community. Such

Foreign Aid For Economic And Humanitarian Development...
Post the Oslo Accords in 1993, multiple countries supported aid for economic and humanitarian
development in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank. Foreign aid was also used to support the
initiation of a peace process between the Palestinians and Israelis. There was a hope of an
improvement in the economic standing in the region from both the international community and
majority of the Palestinian population. However, it is arguable that the economy of the occupied
Gaza Strip and West Bank has in fact plummeted to an even worse condition than before the Oslo
Accords. Although there have been positive short–term outcomes from the Accords, there have been
far more long–term and complex consequences. Donor countries, most importantly the United
States, were not able to effectively allocate aid in order to reduce the inefficiency of the Palestinian
economy. The inability of the United States to provide stable economic and humanitarian
development within Palestine is the result of three main issues: Israeli military occupation and
blockades, the unintentional implementation of a dependency for aid in occupied Palestine, and
political patronage.
Focusing on the United States as a major donor, U.S. bilateral economic and humanitarian assistance
to Palestine will be unsuccessful with continuing support towards Israeli military occupation and
blockades in the occupied West Bank. Palestine has been allocated approximately $5 billion in U.S.
bilateral economic assistance post the Oslo

The Prospect Of A Two State Nation Solution For Israel...
The Israel–Palestine conflict is one of the most long–term, pressing, and largely confounding social,
political, and national quandaries of our age. Since we have been moving with surprising velocity
into the vast horizons of globalization, the conflict has built up tremendous momentum and has
called into question the adequacy of our current attempts at coming to a peaceful resolution that can
simultaneously and successfully address both sides of the struggle. The purpose of this paper has
been to understand the prospect of a two–state nation solution for Israel and Palestine. The
discussion arises a retrospective view of the context behind the present analysis. We begin with a
discourse that informs the reader of the historical narrative between the Jewish inhabitants of Israel
and the Palestinians who also seek to live in the lands which comprise Israel. At the forefront of the
discussion are some key issues such as trends in Israeli settlement expansion over time, the manner
in which these settlements create political challenges towards the prospect of a two–state solution,
and the fragmentation of power within Palestinian political parties which inhibit the opportunity for
proper negotiations amongst the two parties. Finally, we delve into a discussion on nationalism, it's
importance in the discussion of a two–state solution, and the challenges posed when trying to
formulate US Foreign Policy towards the matter.
(Part A) R.B.G.
The scope of Israeli settlement activity

ISM Stands For International Solidarity Movement Essay...
Two women activists fighting for two different causes but fight for the same thing: freedom of group
of people. Neta Golan is a current activist while Harriet Tubman is a past activist; they share
similarities and differences between their actions and cause. ISM stands for international solidarity
movement. ISM is an organization that is focused on assisting Palestinians in the Israeli–
Palestinians conflict, this conflict began in 1948 between the Jews and Arabs after the Holocaust,
fighting for the territory in Gaza. Many attempts have been made to make a two state solution
between the lands but no agreements have been made thus far. ISM was founded in 2001 by
Ghassan Andoni, Neta Golan, Huwaida Arraf and George Rishmawi, together ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
I refused to believe that a soldier would open fire on an innocent child, but I saw it."
(Developyourpresence.com) As her testimony goes on she commented that where she lives in
Nablus, it is seen to often that a civilian being killed by an Israeli soldier. She hated the violence that
was happening. Neta Golan studied Buddhism in Canada while creating her own foundations of
spirituals non–violent resistance. Golan has used her own body to fight for the rights of the
Palestinian civilians. In 2002, Golan was among several different non–violent activists who fortified
themselves inside Yasser Arafat, a Palestinian leader, compound as well as the Church of Nativity.
Inside these two establishments were hundreds of Palestinians fighting for their lives against Israeli
fire. Golan has also used her body for good by tying herself to an olive tree to save them from being
uprooted by Israeli military. "When we accompany Palestinians, because of the racism of the whole
system, the army doesn't treat us as targets the way they treat Palestinians. We want to expose the
racist nature of the conflict by doing this, and also simply try to protect people so they can try to
resist politically." (afsc.org) She continues on her mission to keep the Palestinians safe and is still
part of the ISM. Harriet Tubman was civil rights activist that escaped from slavery in 1849. Tubman
was born into slavery in 1820 in Maryland to enslaved parents. Tubman started

A Barriers For Peace, Or A Barrier To Peace
A Barrier for Peace, or a Barrier to Peace?
Introduction/ Background
Walls are usually built by humans to achieve the purpose of security and privacy. But, what if a wall
was built to limit the movement of hundreds of thousands of people separating them from their lands
and relatives and preventing them from practicing their fundamental daily rights? This is the case in
Palestine; where Israel has constructed a physical wall that isolates Palestinians in the West Bank
and significantly affects their daily life.
The "Apartheid Wall" as named by the Palestinians, or the "Security Fence" as named by Israelis is a
709 Kilometer barrier that extends through the Palestinian West Bank separating it from Israel
(B'Tselem, 2011). The Wall is a multi–layered fence system consisting of razors, stones, concrete,
barbered wires along with checkpoints and watchtowers. The concrete sections of the Wall, near
Jerusalem, Ramallah, and Bethlehem, are more than 8 meters high, more than twice the height of the
famous Berlin Wall. Israel started constructing the Wall in 2002 after ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Dr. Dany Tirza (2012), the IDF's chief architect for the "Separation Wall", says that Israel views the
wall no more than a physical barrier intended to provide peace and security for both sides. Tirza
believes that Israel had no choice other than constructing the Wall. He rejects all the Palestinian
claims that accuse the Wall of annexing lands and destroying the lives of the Palestinians. Tirza
emphasizes the point that the only reason for building the wall is security, with no settlement or
political goals. He furthermore states that the Wall enables "the two sides to lead their lives
separately" (para. 7). He accuses Palestinians of exaggerating their suffering and manipulating the
public opinion by claiming that the Wall is built for settlement, annexation, and endorsing pressure
on the

Hanadi Jaradat's Suicide Attack During The Second Intifada
Initially, Gordon H. McCormick and Lindsay Fritz, introduce Hanadi Jaradat and her suicide attack
during the Second Intifada (140). Jaradat was a law student with great potential however she
resorted to detonating 22 pounds of explosives in an Israeli dinner. Her drive to do this heinous act
was later explained to be retaliatory, her "brother and fiance had been shot by an Israeli
assassination squad" (145). This introduces that terrorism can be used in two strategic ways,
political coercion and political mobilization, the intifada being an example of the latter. In the first,
the audience being the state, terrorism is used to enter negotiations. In the second, the audience
being constituents, terrorism is used to rally popular support. Furthermore,

Analysis Of Street Art Of Israel And Palestine
Before the study of street art in Israel and Palestine can begin, first, one must understand why these
artworks are there – a basic principle in any art theory. For instance, taking Picasso's Guernica (see
fig. 1.1) as an example, it appears at first glance to be a disturbing painting, very abstract in style
and chaotic in its composition. The appeal of abstract art is that it is less superficially explicit. I
would argue that this conveys deeper meaning to the viewer because of the personal journey
required to untangle what it is that he is seeing. When one learns that Picasso painted Guernica in
response to the bombing of his hometown, the namesake of the work, an element of the celestial
emerges, and Picasso's ability to express this ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Furthermore, physically denying access to an area that was previously shared is fraught with flaws.
If a barrier is erected, consideration to the other party must be demonstrated – otherwise expect
retaliation and accusations that it is a form of arbitrary detention on a large scale.
Therefore, it is widely recognised that the partition should stand upon, or be situated inside, the de–
facto border: The Pre–1967 Armistice Line (see fig. 1.2), alternatively known as The Green Line
(hereby referred to as GL) – so named as green ink was used to geographically mark the factions'
territories with respect to their military distribution before the 1967 war. This act situated 78% of
Mandatory Palestine as Israel and was carried out on the arrangement that:
"No provision of this Agreement shall in any way prejudice the rights, claims, and positions of
either Party hereto in the ultimate peaceful settlement of the Palestine question... being dictated
exclusively by military, and not by political, considerations."
In spite of the obvious pitfalls which arise from augmenting the separation barrier away from the
GL's original purpose as an armistice line, it has become recognised by international officials –
inclusive of Arab states and the Palestinian diaspora, e.g. The Palestinian Liberation Organisation –
as the Israeli boundary, despite it never formally declared as

The Second Intifada
In recent years, mostly throughout the second intifada, many different Palestinian organizations
have killed hundreds of Israeli civilians and have injured thousands of Israeli civilians intentionally.
Israel military has needed funding since the wars against the Palestinians because they never know
when they are going to attack them. For example the Palestinians surprised the Israelis during the
Yom Kippur (which is one of the most important holidays for the Jewish) and attacked them. This
really took Israel by surprise because many soldiers were of duty because of the holiday. The
Palestinians have attacked Israel many times, which have left many lives suffering. B'Tselem's
research has found that from June 2004 to November 2012 there has been 4 minors and one foreign
national killed with Palestinians rocket and motor fire, 3 soldiers that were killed in Israel, a Qassam
rocket killed one Israeli and three foreign nationals in the Gaza strip, one Israeli citizen and one
soldier were killed by anti tank missiles. This is just some of the deaths caused by Palestinians.
There has been over 1,000 death in just the beginning of the second intifada. This is one of the
reasons why Israeli needs a better military. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Hertz "Between 1993 and 2001, the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and the Palestinian
Authority (PA) signed six agreements with Israel and conducted countless meetings and summits to
bring about a lasting peace between them. Each Israeli concession was met with Palestinian non–
compliance and escalating violence." The palastinians failed to make their commitments not once
but six times. Then they started to raise their anti– Israel aggression to the point were they started to
break every promise they made and began a all out guerrilla war against Israel and its

Violence And The Second Intifada
CHAPTER–4 Violence and the Second Intifada
The second or al–Aqsa intifada began the day after Ariel Sharon's visit to the Dome of the Rock or
al–Aqsa mosque complex in Jerusalem in late September 2000. Palestinian demonstrators and
worshipers were fired upon, sparking the ongoing uprising. This intifada differed from the first.
While the first intifada was democratic, involving widespread participation, was secular, basically
non–violent, and contributed to peace efforts, this intifada was characterized by participation of a
few, the use of violence against civilians and military alike, and widespread religious idioms. It
decreased allies of the Palestinians among the Israelis and in the west. Where protesters in Israel
previously joined the Palestinians, now Israeli peace ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It also indicates that they are changing their ideology to align more effectively with contemporary
social and political pressures. Welcoming and celebrating the actions of female bombers serves a
purpose that the same support of men's actions would not fulfill: making the plight of the
Palestinians more relatable. If a woman is internationally recognized for detonating a bomb in Israel
while a man would be only mentioned in passing, then it is very worthwhile to the Palestinian cause
to use women to facilitate as much publicity and promotion of political goals as possible. Bloom
maintains that "this is a political war, not a religious war, and the suicide bombings are being
carefully planned and executed as part of a precise political strategy." The usage of women is a
definite part of this strategy, whether they are participating through their own initiative or are being
actively

1967 Six Day War
Assess the consequences of the 1967 (Six Day) War for Arab–Israeli relations
On the 23rd May 1967, the Israelis declared war on the Arabs due to the blocking of the straits to
Israeli shipping. The 1967 Six Day War had a major impact on Arab–Israeli relations. This is due to
Israel gaining control over the occupied territories, large increases of Jewish settlement in the
occupied territories, the increase of Israeli military in the Middle East.
The Israeli occupation of Arab territories had a large impact on Arab–Israeli relations. Through the
dominancy of the Israeli army during the Six Day War, they were able to capture the Sinai
Peninsula, the Gaza Strip from Egypt, East Jerusalem, the West Bank from Jordon and the Golan
Heights from ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Historian Avner Cohen writes, "In the end Israel launched a pre–emptive aerial attack in which most
of the Egyptian air force was destroyed, virtually deciding the Six Day War. Through Israel's
dominance they were regarded as the 'strongest military power in the Middle East'. Also, the Arabs
had become severely weakened as a result of the Six Day War, as they had lost a high amount of
casualties and the relations between Syria, Jordon and Egypt declined as evident through Syria not
accepting UN Resolution 242 while Egypt and Jordon did. Through Israel's superiority, their
relations with Egypt had improved as highlighted through Egypt recognising Israel as a state in
1979. Nevertheless, Israel's dominancy also stresses its improvement in its relations with Jordan
signing a peace treaty in 1994, and Iran signing a peace treaty in 1979. Even though, certain
relations improved the Arabs would turn to terrorism and the Israeli army would be seen as the
aggressor. By Israel dominating the Six Day War and establishing itself as the 'strongest military
power in the Middle East, its relations with other Arab countries had dramatically improved.
In conclusion, the 1967 Six Day War had a major impact on Arab–Israeli relations. Due to Israel
gaining control over the occupied territories and increasing its settlement, the Arab–Israeli relations
had declined as the Arabs were livid that Israel would not

The Middle East : International Politics And Economics...
The Middle East leaves one of the largest stains on the consciousness of international relations. The
Arab – Israeli conflict was quickly emerging as one of the largest issues within the region. In
particular, the Israeli – Palestinian conflict became a bloody and violent conflict that world powers
along with neighboring countries to use for their gains. The Middle East has historically been a
contentious playing ground for world powers, this very strategic location offered militaristic
advantages and a gateway between Europe and the Far East. The Middle East has consistently
proved its importance in international politics and economics during World War II, the discovery of
oil, and the Cold War; coupled with the internal political instability and contention between world
powers, it has become a region of much unrest and constant conflict.
After the atrocities of World War II along with the birth of Zionism to empower the Jewish people a
home was chosen in the land of Palestine an area with a rich history to the Jewish people. The
creation of the state of Israel in 1948, recognized by the Palestinian people as 'Yawm an–Nakba'
meaning day of catastrophe, the dynamics of Middle Eastern politics would dramatically change.
The Arab – Israeli conflict is one of the bloodiest, uncontrollable, protracted and resentful conflicts
within the modern era of international relations. The seemingly never–ending conflict between two
dominating ideologies that bring with it a mass of

Beautiful Souls Summary
Chapter three of Eyal Press' Beautiful Souls follows Avner Wishnitzer, an Israeli combat soldier
serving in the occupied territories during the Second Intifada. In the 6–Day War of 1967, Israel
captured the West Bank and the Gaza Strip and has since kept the land under an Israeli military
occupation. In 1987 to 1991, a Palestinian uprising involving resistance and civil disobedience,
known as the First Intifada, occurred in the occupied territories. Consequently, Israel deployed many
soldiers into the occupied territories, and an estimated 1,674 people were killed in total. The Second
Intifada, a much more violent Palestinian uprising in the occupied territories, transpired from 2000
until 2005. In response, Israel enacted Operation Defensive Shield, a large–scale military operation,
in 2002 to stop the terrorist attacks and suicide bombings of the Second Intifada. An approximate
4,426 people were killed in the Second Intifada. Avner Wishnitzer's public refusal to serve in the
occupied territories was worth getting kicked out of Sayeret Matkal and being disgraced by Israeli
society because it made people question the occupation and the treatment towards Palestinians. Even
if Avner had been my father, I would have condoned his choices because I could create my own
reputation in the military. Additionally, the current controversy over the Israeli occupation
legitimizes his stance and actions for many Israeli citizens.
Avner Wishnitzer was a weak and scrawny kid born in a

The Sociocultural and Political Influence of Hamas in...
The Islamic Resistance Movement, also known as al–Harakah al–Muqawama al–Islamiya (Hamas),
has proven to be an extremely agile and capable terrorist organization in Palestine. They benefit
from a deep–rooted sociocultural infrastructure, highly lethal tactics and a complex hierarchy of
leadership, all of which have allowed the organization to prosper for over two decades. As where
90% of terrorist groups wither and rapidly falter, Hamas has been able to quickly adapt to the
constantly changing political and social environment of Palestine . This evolution, has always
assured the organization a generous group of adherents. The necessity to change based on
environmental stressors has likened it to a "multipronged organism, which has ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Both of these approaches would pave the way for Hamas' seemingly bipolar tenure in Palestine. By
the 1970's, the Palestinian population was disillusioned by secularism, Westernization and
materialism, and many looked toward the Muslim Brotherhood and the Islamic revival as an
alternative . A drastic turn of events led to niche in Palestine that a more violent facet of the Muslim
Brotherhood was willing to fill. Since the 1950's, the Muslim Brotherhood complemented the
spiritual services provided in mosques with social and welfare services, delivered through a network
of clinics, schools, charities, drug treatment centers, and even sports clubs . However, since 1988,
with the onset of the fist intifada, Hamas has followed an oscillatory pattern of violence and social
charitable work. During the first and second intifada, Hamas inspired the greater Palestinian public
to support violent means to incite change in the region. Conversely, during the Oslo peace process,
when the majority of Palestinians did not condone the level of violence that was seen during the first
intifada, Hamas dedicated more time towards their social roots, ultimately increasing their
grassroots support. During these lulls in violence with Israel, Hamas successfully institutionalized
Islamism in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. According to Sarah Roy, by 2000, 10 to 40 percent of all
social institutions in the West Bank and Gaza were Islamic . Arguably, these expanded new areas of
Islamic social

Human Right For The People Of Israel And Palestine
Peace is a basic human right for the people of Israel and Palestine. Given the tenuous nature of
amity between Israel and Palestine, this is a difficult subject at best. However, there are women out
there that believe in, and engage in, peacebuilding efforts between these two territories. Women's
participation in the peace building process of these two countries is vital to the construction of an
unbiased, proactive reconciliation to occur. Because women comprise a large percentage of the
population in these countries, their input and nonviolent negotiating practices are extremely
important considering the escalation of violence in the presently unstable situation between these
warring parties. Since women have a tendency to operate from a nonviolent arena, their inclusion in
the peace building efforts are necessary to eliminate the violence that is ripping these two countries
apart. Women are generally viewed as keepers of the domestic domain, thus, they stand to lose their
very foundation if peace cannot be achieved. At a time when the conflict between these groups has
reached an all–time high, it is of upmost importance for women to help pave the way to culminate a
peaceful coexistence between these two opposing factions. The imperative need for a resolution to
this age–old conflict must find some immediate answers. There are many women operating at a
grassroots level which will hopefully bring about some significant changes that will be instrumental
to creating a

Violence Is Immoral And Wrong
Society has been subjected to many violent acts over the course of its history. Although violence is
immoral and wrong, somehow people everyday condone and commit violence for countless reasons.
Many Hollywood films glorify mindless violence to their advantage and captivate audiences through
its entertaining shock value and rake large box office profits. Car chases, crashes and glorified
gladiator sword fights are all familiar scenes in which violence is portrayed in an unrealistic
glamorised manner.
Alternatively, many directors aim to portray violence in a far more realistic way as it aims not to
condone it. Instead, they seek to show the true repercussions of violent acts among society. Hany
Abu–Assad (Paradise Now) and Tony Kaye (American History X) intend to challenge and create an
alternative view to violence through the way they portray it. They all demonstrate the vicious and
futile cycle of violence and how it is a useless notion that only sparks more terror and misery.
Further, they seek to show an understanding to the audiences of just why people succumb to such
violent acts, opening a window into the world of the perpetrators and how they perceive violence as
an answer to their struggles. Both films deal with different issues of violence, however,
fundamentally sustain the same profoundness. They all seek to teach peace through violence in the
way they depict violent acts and hateful behaviour as senseless and wrong, aiming for the moral
message to transcend

The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Essay
The Israeli–Palestinian conflict has been a never–ending problem facing the two states. It began in
the 19th century during the Ottoman or British rule. This was between the Arabs living in Palestine
and the Jews living in Israel. It was Zionism for the Jews against Arab nationalism. This conflict
was known as the Arab–Israeli conflict. The main issues were; border disputes, security, the control
of Jerusalem, recognition as well as Palestinian freedom of movement. These issues are what spear
headed the intensifying of the conflict thus it became as part of day to day activity between the two
states. The Zionists believed that Palestine was their land as according to them it was part of their
historic homeland– Land of Israel. The Arabs ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
There is great fear on the Israelis side if Palestinians are given the authority to rule Jerusalem. In
order for this not to happen the Israelis are fighting to ensure this does not occur. During the late
19th century, Jews were being massacred in Russia by Hitler. They retaliated by escaping and
settling in Jerusalem their historic homeland (Flapan 2003). At that time, there were Palestinian
nationals who were already occupying some parts of Jerusalem. In order to settle, the Jews displaced
the Palestinians and took over their lands. The Palestinians thus became refugees and this was in
1948. This has disturbed the Palestinian Government ever since. Together with its citizens, Palestine
wants its people restored to their homelands. This has led to serious confrontations between the two
states which has caused collateral damage. Quite unfortunately, no signs of peace or reconciliation
are evident between the two states. There have been a lot of concerns by the Israeli about their
security and safety. Palestinians over the past years have attacked Israelis and caused grievous
damages. This to the Israelis and other nations is an act of terrorism. Their opponents view the
violence as jihad which is a holy war (Flapan 2003). They want to acquire the Jewish state and label
it as the Arab state. Their violence has caused havoc to the Israelis. This has caused international
recognition by other nations around the world. However Palestinians do not seem to

The Middle East Peace Process Essay
'For too long, the citizens of the Middle East have lived in the midst of death and fear. The hatred of
a few holds the hopes of many hostage. The forces of extremism and terror are attempting to kill
progress and peace by killing the innocent. And this casts a dark shadow over an entire region,'
President George W. Bush in his June 24, 2002 address to the nation.
The conflict between Israel and Palestine is just one of the many facets that have shaped modern day
politics in the Middle East. It is a conflict rooted in generations of violence, discrimination and
prejudice that is complicated by a history older than any of the modern day superpowers. Ever since
the creation of the state of Israel by the 1947 UN partition of Palestine ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Keeping these thoughts in mind I will investigate some key issues that affect the progress towards
peace in the region including the relationship that exists between the United States and Israel; the
2002 Road Map to Peace and why it failed; and finally the effect of Arafat?s death and the
implications for the future.
The Relationship between Israel and the United States. The idea of ?special relationships? between
two countries has been used throughout history to describe the relations between the United States
and various other countries. Winston Churchill popularized the term in his ?Iron Curtain? speech in
1946, describing the ties between the United States and Great Britain as a ?special relationship.?
Any number of diplomatic alliances and relationships could be considered a special relationship;
however politicians and scholars tend to agree that the most special relationship in the international
system is the one that exists between the United States and Israel. President Jimmy Carter once
noted that ?we have a special relationship with Israel. It?s absolutely crucial that no one in our
country or around the world ever doubt that our number–one commitment in the Middle East is to
protect the right of Israel to exist.? The nature of such a

The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Essay
Introduction
The Israeli–Palestinian conflict is one of the most controversial conflicts in modern history. The
expansion of Israel since 1947 is seen as the beginning of the conflict, although its origins go back
to the end of the 19th century, when Jewish immigration to Palestine began to increase. Since the
start of the conflict, several peace negotiations have been carried out, resulting in variable degrees of
success. This essay will focus on how theorists of peace and conflict have analysed the conflict in
recent history. Especially, the peace process after the first Palestinian intifada and the 1993 Oslo–
agreements will be analysed. In addition, this essay will shed light on the involvement of the United
States in the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The General Assembly of the UN adopted the partition plan, but the UN Security Council never
enforced the plan. After Britain left Palestine, fighting between Arabs and Jews immediately broke
out (ibid.; 82–83). In 1948, Zionist forces, due to their military pre–eminence, gained control over
the territory which the UN designated to the Jews in the failed partition plan. On 14 May 1948, they
declared Israeli independence and established the Israeli state (Fawcett, 2005; 221). The US
recognised Israel quickly as a state and soon after that the Soviet Union did the same. The Arab
League, formed out of six Arab states, did not recognise Israel as a state, because they felt the land
belonged to the Arabic state of Palestine, not to the Jews. Subsequently, the six Arab forces (Egypt,
Jordan, Iraq, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia and Syria) attacked the Israeli military. The Lebanese, Syrian,
Iraq and Saudi Arabian forces did not produce many offensive operations, but they managed to
block the Israeli's march. The 'real' fighting came from the Egyptian and Jordan forces. In the
beginning, the Arabs had an advantage of weapons and air–power, whilst Israel had problems with
their strategy. However, after a few months Israel was provided with war supplies from
Czechoslavakia. This included both weapons for using on the mainland and aircrafts. Due to these
supplies,

Success of Al Jazeera English in Pakistan's Media
Despite Pakistan's opposition at the time, a 2008 survey was taken on Pakistani media preference
and provided a belief that Al Jazeera English would find success with the country. Surprisingly,
news stations were watched more frequently and on a regular basis over entertainment channels and
networks. Pakistan is known for a high volume of individuals and families that are wealthy,
educated, and urban. This demographic has been proven to be more likely to watch the news. It was
also found that rural and low income Pakistanis also chose satellite television over state–run media.
On top of that, 70 percent of Pakistan's general population have access to satellite in their
residences, paving a clear way for Al Jazeera's success in this particular area of the world.
This day and age, there are a large number of networks covering world news. From Al Jazeera to
CNN, there is a variety to pick and choose from. Though similar in the topics the networks cover,
discuss, and air, they all have a different approach in presentation. Al Jazeera English's website
covered The "Park 51 Mosque" Controversy. It has also been referred to as the "Ground Zero
Mosque". There was a proposal to build an Islamic center, on 51 Park Place, costing near $100
million. It was to be located in Manhattan, New York. This became a national and global
controversy regarding the September 11th terrorist attack. "Some Sept. 11 victims' families and
others view the proposed mosque site –– in a building

The West Bank
1. Amiry proves that the stereotypes of the Israeli and Palestinian people are misguided. Salim,
Suad's husband, treats her very well. The same goes for many other Palestinian husbands. Suad is an
educated architect. Despite that stereotype that Israeli and Palestinian's hate each other, the book
proves that not to be the case. Suad takes an Israeli man to the hospital due to a heart attack proving
that compassion, at times, can override territories. She chooses an Israeli vet for her dog, Nura.
1.1 Suad chose the Israeli vet because she felt that Dr. Hisham was sexist for taking so long to give
Nura her vaccines due to her being a female dog. She was able to get better medicine for Nura. This
is a big deal because Nura enjoys more ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
3.3 The soap factory was historic. Suad felt like their heritage was slowly being erased. The soap
factory did not have all of the strict rules in place that the other business's did.
3.4 Suad was a rebel of sorts. Her personality rubbed the soldiers the wrong way. So in a sense, they
tore it up because they could. She would stare at the soldiers and they did not like that.
4. Suad dealt with the occupation with finding humor in the absurdity of it all. Like when she gave
the the soldier the excuse the Nura could not driver herself to Jerusalem and needed Suad to drive
her. She found humor with Salim and his cousin getting arrested not for breaking rules but for the
mere fact that she would not stop staring at a soldier. Humor was how she survived.
4.1 Rami felt like he could seek revenge on his classmates if he became a collaborator. Collaborators
felt like they would get easier access to Israel but were looked upon as traitors by the Palestinians.
5.1The thing that surprised me the most about Budrus were the women. They seemed more fearless
than the men on some occasions. I had to laugh when the women would say to the one female Israeli
soldier, "Yasina, come join us." I was also surprised at how peaceful the Palestinian people tried to
protest.
5.2 Both sides want peace. By watching the movie it seemed as so many olive trees were being
destroyed

Impact Of Terrorism On The Middle East
HAMAS INTRODUCTION: Terrorism in the Middle East has brought the Israeli–Palestinian
conflict to the attention of the world. These terrorist groups use murder, bombs, threats, and other
violent acts to get their way politically. Hamas, the organization that has replaced Fatah as the
representative of the Palestinians, is a leading sponsor of terrorism. Critics say the group is a
terrorist organization that wants nothing but to wipe Israel off the face of the Earth. Supporters say
Hamas, which represents the only organized Palestinian military force, is a coalition of freedom
fighters and liberators defending the Palestinian people.
HAMAS CREATION AND LEADERSHIP: This group was created in 1987 and continues to
expand its power today. Hamas formed in late 1987 at the beginning of the first Palestinian intifada.
Hamas was created by Sheik Ahmad Yasinat, along with Abdel Aziz al–Rantissi, and Mohammad
Taha in late 80's at the beginning of the first Palestinian uprising"( Biersteker 2008). Hamas uses
paramilitary force and the violent part of Hamas, stage anti–Israeli attacks including improvised
explosive device attacks, and rocket attacks against Israeli targets inside the country of Israel. Its
roots are in the Palestinian branch of the Muslim Brotherhood, and it is supported by a robust
sociopolitical structure inside the Palestinian territories. "The group's charter calls for establishing
an Islamic Palestinian state in place of Israel and rejects all agreements made

Yasser Arafat Research Paper
Yasser Arafat In The Move Toward a Palestinian State
Yasser Arafat was born into a Palestinian family in Egypt in 1929. Even in his early life he began
fighting from age eighteen onwards, first the British, then the Israelis. At the age of thirty he
founded a magazine in 1959 which aimed to create and identity for the Palestinians living in camps.
This was a good way of giving the people publicity and also shows that his original motives when
he was young were good.
As time went on, Arafat's actions began to contradict his early good intentions as he set up Al–Fatah,
a guerrilla movement that set up guerrilla cells to launch attacks into Israel. This already made him
look like more of a ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He gained respect for the Palestinian cause.
Apparently realising his tactics were ineffective; in 1974 he opted for a new strategy. He was
allowed to access the UN claiming "I have come bearing an olive branch and a freedom–fighter's
gun. Do not let the olive branch fall from my hand." This quote sums up Arafat's ambivalence. He
claims he wants peace but if that requires terror, he seems prepared for anything. However the fact
that he mentioned the olive branch, a symbol for peace, gave good publicity for the cause and this
was also the first time a Palestinian had managed to speak to the UN so this was an important step in
the fight for a Palestinian state because there would be a chance for discussion.
In 1982 Israel attacked the Lebanon and Arafat fled. His leadership was weak but the upshot of the
attacks was support gained from various parties. In 1987 Arafat seemed to change his tactics once
more, making him look all the more fickle and unstable. He announced Intifada and at last respected
the right for Israel to exist and renounced terror. At the time this showed that Arafat wanted to gain
international respect and again would allow discussion, the possibility of peace and a move towards
a Palestinian state.
When the Gulf war began in 1990, Arafat made the massive mistake of siding with Saddam

Peace Negotiations in International Security
Post–Cold War era is marked by the dominance of peace negotiations in international security, and
Middle–east (ME) being a conflict area for a long time, got adequate focus. Tale of oil rich ME is a
story of conflicts having Israel–Palestine issue at the core, and the stability and peace of this region
largely hinged on to the solution of this issue. So far, a number of unsuccessful initiatives have been
taken by world community for the solution of the issue. 'Roadmap for peace' was one of such
initiative, initially coined by USA, which calls for a two state solution. Like other past initiatives
this also turned into a failure. Though the share of blame for failure goes to all stake holders,
however, USA got the large share of blames from international community due to her bias stance
towards Israel. This biasness is driven from long drawn USA–Israel relationship built upon factors
like sympathy for Israel within USA, mental alikeness, strategic importance of Israel, influences of
Israeli Lobby etcetera. Though all these factors have their role in shaping US foreign policy in ME
but many argue that Israeli Lobby plays the most dominant role. In this essay an endeavour will be
made to discuss biasness of USA towards Israel in Israel–Palestine peace process and discuss USA–
Israel relationship as the basis of such biasness, using Roadmap (2003) as case study. In the process,
it will first discuss peace negotiation in general, followed by discussions on Roadmap and the role
and

Sources of Conflict BetweenPalestine and Israel
The conflict between Palestine and Israel stems from disagreements about the land, differences in
the opinions of historical change of boundaries, differences in religion and also disagreements
among international actors that have influenced how the conflict has played out since the boundaries
of Israel were drawn up after World War II.
This paper will focus on the armed conflict between Palestine, specifically the Hamas–backed Gaza
strip and the state of Israel that has led to the loss of many lives on both sides, while at the same
time, created tensions between state actors that make the idea of this conflict being eventually
resolved almost impossible unless there is some major change in the internal and external
environment. The armed conflict that the paper describes is between Hamas which is viewed as a
Islamist terrorist group by Israel, the United States and several other countries with their ultimate
goal being winning back the land that they claim to be theirs and also turning Palestine into an
Islamic fundamentalist state. On the other hand, the state of Israel defines itself as a Jewish and
Democratic State, with 75% of their population being Jewish which would make it a Jewish
majority state. Israel also governs itself on the Basic Laws of Israel, which include the Israeli
nationality law that in effect grants the right to all Jewish people the right to return to Israel and
automatically be able to receive Israeli citizenship and establishes Jerusalem as the

How Has Palestinian Application for Un Membership and...
Abstract
The purpose of the research "How has Palestinian application for UN membership and statehood
recognition affected the advancement of the peace process between Israel and Palestine?" was to
provide a thorough examination of the Arab–Israeli conflict and estimate the possible courses of its
development in case of UN interference into the matter.
The method used in the process of investigation consisted in accessing English and Israeli websites,
including the official website of the Parliament of Israel, in order to collect the necessary
information on the issue. A vast amount of opinions was gathered and applied in the research, that
helped to create the holistic picture of the problem under consideration.
As a result of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The aggravating conflict underwent several basic stages: * 1948 Arab–Israeli War (the first war) *
1956 the Suez Crisis (the second war) * 1967, 1973 (the third and the forth wars) * 1978–1979
Camp David peace process * 1982 Lebanon War (the fifth war) * 1993–2000 Oslo peace process *
2000–2005 The Second Intifada (the sixth war)
Despite the long history of confrontation the main points of controversy remained unchanged. They
are: * the status of Jerusalem * Palestinian refugees * the Israeli settlements * the borders
Each period of the conflict was characterized by either escalation or reduction of tension, but since
it's not the main concern of this research, we will only consider some of the agreements signed by
the opposing sides, in order to show what attempts had been made to resolve the conflict before
Palestine turned to the UN for assistance.
Subheading 1: The attempts to negotiate peace between Israel and Palestine.
One of the main attempts to resolve the conflict was the Oslo Agreement that was signed in
September 1993 in Washington and was supposed to settle the arguments between the two countries.
For Israel, that always considered PLO to be a terrorist organization and refused any diplomatic
contacts with it, it was a tough political decision. According to the agreement the PLO had to stop
any terroristic action

The Israeli-Palestinian Wall
The Israeli–Palestinian wall that has been under construction for nearly twelve years is adding more
fuel to a fire that appears to only be growing. The wall has been doing more harm to the Israeli–
Palestinian conflict than good. Ironically, the wall was created to help the conflict during the time of
the Second Intifada that occurred from 2000 to 2006. The intention of the wall at the time was to put
"...an end to the phenomenon of cross–border Palestinian suicide bombers", and also had a "...wide
support withing Israel, where it is seen as a security measure" (Procon.org 2). Over time, the once
perceived "security measure" turned into a negative aftereffect, mainly for the Palestinians. The
Israeli–Palestinian wall has negative outcomes ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Palestinian economy, due to the route of the wall, has suffered tremendously. The displacement
of Palestinian civilians has been a major contributor to this issue. New rules and regulations require
citizens who live in the territory between the green line must apply for a series of permits that would
allow them to live, drive, and work in the zone in which they are entrapped (Roy 34). Therefore, as
Theirry Delbreuve said, "...agricultural communities were losing contact with the land on which
they depended both for their present livelihood and for their future survival" (United Nations Page
2). Palestine's economy has suffered tremendously, because Israel has made it possible through the
construction of the wall to have full control over Palestinian's resources, such as land, water, and
labor. This in turn has created Palestinian economic dependence on and with Israel (Current History
Page 32). As stated in Current History, the World Bank estimates that it will take some 20 years for
the Palestinian economy to return to where it was on the eve of the current Intifada, as their
economy has contracted by half (Page 32). Palestine's "...access to work, food, housing, and other
needed resources has been severely eroded" (Current History Page 35), having a huge economic toll
on Palestine's economy, which in turn has increased tensions between the

Frames Of War: The Conflict Between Israel And Palestine
The conflict between Israel and Palestine is not easily understood, nor easily resolved. There are a
vast number of ways through which this conflict has been interpreted, however I believe that
exploring the Israeli–Palestinian struggles of and for nationalism through a Butlerian lens may lead
to valuable insights into the use of nationalism by both Israel and Palestine. I specifically draw from
Judith Butler's Frames of War, to explore how both Israel and Palestine construct their struggles for
(legitimate) nationalism in terms of livability and grievability. In particular, I will focus upon the
conceptions of Zionism, or Israeli nationalism, and Palestinian nationalism, through the Oslo
Accords and their immediate aftermath. Zionism can ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Without grievability, there is no life, or, rather, there is something living that is other than life.
Thus, Zionism and Palestinian nationalism in constructing a livable subject, that is a subject whose
life has value, are also constructing a grievable life, that is a life that will be grieved if lost. Both
nationalist ideologies are deeply rooted within notions of livability/grievability, in which each
ideology understands itself as non–grievable by the other, whether than other is Israel, Palestine, or
the larger looming

Male Masculinity : The Mysterious Disappearance Of Mustafa...
Male Masculinity in Palestine
A word such as "strong" is arguably the most used word that is associated with masculinity. Men are
often being described as "manly" or "macho" ideas that appear to define individual men and
masculinity itself. This concept and definition are followed throughout the world especially in the
Arab world, which includes Palestine and Israel. Vanished: The Mysterious Disappearance of
Mustafa Ouda is a book written by Ahmed Masoud that tells a story about the main protagonist
Omar Ouda. Who is in search to find his father, but goes through a major change throughout the
book. In the book, there are three gender roles of men that seem to go through various alternation.
And in an article "Male Gender and Rituals of Resistance in the Palestinian "Intifada" written by
Julie Peteet elaborates on how young man in Palestinian are able to obtain their manhood by getting
tortured by the Israeli army and resisting their demands. In Palestinian culture and society, there is a
specific depiction of male masculinity. In the book Vanished: The Mysterious Disappearance of
Mustafa Ouda the main character Omar went through a different transformation in his life both
physically and mentally growing up in Palestine, which was occupied by Israel. One the most
important event in his life that emasculate his manhood was when he was raped by an Israeli
militant officer named Uri. Not, only did Uri took Omar's innocence away he also both physically
and mentally took

Causes of the Six Day War
What were the causes of Israel–Palestine war?
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABSTRACT
AANALYSIS
THE CAUSES OF ISRAEL/PALESTINE CONFLICT:
THE FIRST INTIFADA 1987–93
DIVIDING THE MAP
THE 1948 WAR
ZIONISM
1967/OCCUPATION
THE ARABS, TERRORISM & SECURITY: "NO SOLUTION"
THE WALL/FENCE/BARRIER
DELEGITIMIZING
THE STATEHOOD DECLARATION BY PALESTINE
THE IMPACT OF SCARCE WATER RESOURCES ON THE ARAB–ISRAEL CONFLICT
CAMP DAVID FAILURE
THE ISRAEL–PALESTINE CONFLICT IS CENTRAL TO THE MILITANTS' CAUSE
Abstract
The notion of this research essay is to discuss the causes of the Israel–Palestine war. The first
priority of the paper is to address the war in detail by describing the war. Another perspective that
the essay will take in answering the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Al Qaeda
Another key concept in the study of Israel–Palestine war is that of Al Qaeda which is an
international terrorist organization more of an ideology than an organization. According to Burke
(2004:1) in 1987, Abdullah Azzam, the forefront dialogue for contemporary Sunni Muslim
fundamental advocates, instigated for al–Qaeda al–sulbah which is a frontline of the robust. The
notorious leader envisioned an ideology about men acting autonomously, as the route that will lead
the all of the Islamic society and therefore stimulate the umma which refers to worldwide
community of believers against its oppressors. The al Qaeda endorses the general rule of terrorism.
Concept of delegitimization
According to Oren & Bar–Tal (2011:112), in broad, delegitimization refers to stereotypes with
tremendously bad meanings that is used to label a particular instance of group categorization.
Furthermore the scholar states that it is based on tremendously negative outgroup classification and
targeted at depriving the other group's humanity.

Yasser Arafat
Arafat, President of the Palestinian Authority (PA), decided that the new State of Palestine should be
drove in blood and fire thus he released Palestinian militants instead of accepting a discussed
resolve of the encounter (Jansen, 2003:1). According to Jansen (2003:16), the Arafat and the
Palestinian authorities wanted an outburst of viciousness the scholar further stated that the

An Analysis Of The Interactive Violence Of The...

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Jennifer Reither

More from Jennifer Reither (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

An Analysis Of The Interactive Violence Of The...