detection method for health sensor

1. A Malware Detection Method for Health Sensor Data
Based on Machine Learning
Abstract:
Traditional signature-based malware detection approaches are sensitive to small changes in
the malware code. Currently, most malware programs are adapted from existing programs. Hence,
they share some common patterns but have different signatures. To health sensor data, it is necessary
to identify the malware pattern rather than only detect the small changes. However, to detect these
health sensor data in malware programs timely, we propose a fast detection strategy to detect the
patterns in the code with machine learning-based approaches. In particular, XGBoost, LightGBM and
Random Forests will be exploited in order to analyze the code from health sensor dataTerabytes of
program with labels, including benign and malware programs, have been collected. The challenges of
this task are to select and get the features, modify the three models in order to train and test the
dataset, which consists of health sensor data, and evaluate the features and models. When a malware
program is detected by one model, its pattern will be broadcast to the other models, which will
prevent malware program from intrusion effectively.
Introduction:
INTRODUCTION With the advent of the Internet of Things Era, all kinds of sensors are
applied to collect health sensor data. Inevitably, some malware or malicious codes concealed in
health sensor data, which are considered as intrusion in the target host computer, are executed
according to the logic prescribed by a hacker. The categories of malicious codes in health sensor
data include computerviruses,worms,trojans,botnets,ransomware andsoon[1]. Malware attacks
can steal core data andsensitive informationanddamage computersystemsandnetworks.It is one
of the greatest threats to today's computer security [2, 3]. The method of performing malware
analysis is usually one of two types [4-7]. (1) Static analysis is usually accomplished by
demonstrating the different resources of a binary file without implementing it and studying each
component.Binaryfilescanalsobe disassembled (or redesign) using a disassembler (such as IDA).
Machine code can sometimes be interpreted into assembly code and humans can read and
understand assembly code. Malware analysts can understand assembly instructions and get an
image of what the program should execute. Some modern malware is created using ambiguous
techniquestodefeatthistype of analysis,suchasembeddinggrammatical code errors.These errors
can confuse the disassembler, but they still work in the actual execution. (2) Dynamic analysis is
performed by observing how the malware actually behaves when it runs on the host 1 This work
was supported by the Qatar National Research Fund (a member of the Qatar Foundation) under
Grant NPRP10-1205-160012. The statements made herein are solely the responsibility of the
authors. system. Modern malware can encompass a variety of ambiguous techniques that are

2. designedtoovercome dynamicanalysis,includingtestingvirtualenvironmentsor active debuggers,
delaying the execution of malicious payloads, or requiring some form of interactive user input
EXISTINGSYSTEM :
Basedon thissituation,anatural ideaisto applymachine learning-based methods that use
existing experience and knowledge to perform static code analysis on unknown binary code and
automaticallyclassifymalware.Accordingtothe guidance,thispaperuses the related technologies
of machine learningbasedmethodsandexploresthe applicationof thismethodinthe classification
of malware
DIS ADVANTAGE:
Must need basicknowledge to perform static code analysis on unknown binary code and
automatically classify malware
PROPOSED SYSTEM :
In this paper, we mainly focus on static code analysis. The early static code analysis
methodsmainly include feature matchingorbroad-spectrumsignature scanning. Feature matching
simplyusesfeature stringmatchingtocompletethe detection, while the broad-spectrum scanning
scans the feature code andusesmaskedbytestodivide the sections that need to be compared and
those that do not need to be compared. Since both methods need to get malware samples and
extractfeaturesbefore theycanbe detected,the hysteresis problem is serious. Furthermore, with
the developmentof malware technology,malware begins to deform in the transmission process in
order to avoid being found and killed, and there is a sudden increase in the number of malware
variants. The shape of the variants changes a lot so that it is difficult to extract a piece of code as a
malware signature.
ADVANTAGE:
simplyusesfeature stringmatchingtocompletethe detection,whilethe broad-spectrum
scanning done both comparison and un-comparsion
Datasets:
The datasets are manually download from kaggle
We use the PE header to get the first 4096 number strings of exe files as follows. Number string of
exe files.
Thisis a seriesof stringsfrom 0-255, and a label 0/1 is at the beginning. We count the number of 0-
255s in all strings and make libsvm files using them.
Libsvm files A libsvm file is a common data format in machine learning. Each line in it starts with a
label and some data such as x:y

3. Technology:
• Machine learning
• Deep learning
• Python packages
Programming language andpackages:
• Python
• Numpy,pandas,keras,sklearn,tkintertable,matplotlib,pillow,imutils.
• Tensorflow,opencv,nlp,nltketc
Software
• Pythonidel 3.7 version (or)
• Anaconda3.7 ( or)
• Jupiter (or)
• Google colab
Hardware
• Operatingsystem:windows,linux
• Processor: minimuminteli3
• Ram: minimum4 gb
• Harddisk: minimum250gb
Algorithm models
XGBoost,LightGBMand RandomForests
Working modules
• Dataset upload
• Pre-processing data

4. • Extracting dataset
• Spliting dataset traing and testing
• Applying models
Project implementation
• Gatheringthe datasetfromdatabase
• Pre-processingthe datasetandanalysisdataset
• Splittingthe datasetsintotrainingandtestinginthe ration80% XGBoost,LightGBMand
RandomForestsmodels toanalysisthe data
• Obtainthe accuracy in prediction
Input
• The inputis csv data
Output
• The outputis the accuracy inprediction
conclusion
• Withthe increasingcomplexityof malware codesconcealedinhealthsensordata,the
applicationof machine learningalgorithmsinthe detectionof maliciouscode hasbeen
increasinglyvaluedbythe academiccommunityandnumeroussecurityvendors.Basedonthe
theoryof machine learning,thispapercombinesthe advantagesof differentmodels[31-33,36-
37] anddiscussesthe staticcode analysisbasedondifferentmachine learningalgorithmsand
differentcode features.Thisworkcanprovide referential value forthe future designand
implementationof malware detectiontechnologyformachine learning[34].However,thisarea
still belongstothe developmental stage.There are still manyfuture tasksandchallengesand
theyare summarizedbelow
• 1. Lack of valuable data:A machine learningalgorithmoftenrequirestensof thousandsof data
[35] to be trainedinorder to getan effectivemodel.The acquisitionof these basicdataoften
requiresmanual operationsandthe speedcannotbe guaranteed.

5. • 2. Lack of interpretable results:The internal reasonisthatformanyfeatures,we onlyknowthat
theyare effective anddonotknow why.The interpretation of thisissue will be the most
importantchallenge forthe future.