The document provides information about Coca-Cola's history, operations, and controversies in India. It details Coca-Cola's founding in 1886, expansion globally, and return to India in 1993 after a 16-year absence. It discusses Coca-Cola's vision, market share, suppliers code of conduct, and quality promises. However, it also outlines accusations of unethical practices like a lack of transparency, unhealthy products, excessive water use, and environmental pollution. One controversy discussed in depth is Coca-Cola's plant in Kerala, where locals complained of water depletion and waste dumping containing toxins. The document raises questions about the company's corporate governance and ethics.
3. • History
• Company Profile
• Mission & Vision
• Market Share
• Claim as ethical business
• Supplier guiding principle
• Quality and promises
• Unethical practices by cola
• Unethical nature by cola
• Excessive water usage ( kerala)
• Corporate governance mechanism by cola
• Case study base question
Road Map
3
12. Company Profile 12
Name TheCoca ColaCompany
Industries served Beverages
Geographic areasserved Worldwide
Headquarters Atlanta, Georgia,U.S.
CurrentCEO James Quincey
Revenue 41.86 billion USD
2016
Profit $12.16 billion
2016
Employees 100,000
13. Coca Cola In India
• Coca-Cola, the corporate nourishing global community with the worlds
largest selling soft drink concentrates since 1886, returns to India in 1993
after a gap of 16 years.
• With the acquisitions of major brands in India it went on to be known as
The Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt Ltd.
Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages Private Limited is a 100% company
owned Bottler. • The company has 3 business regions, and operates out of
22 locations across India. • Their business model includes manufacturing
the beverage,
13
14. Company profile
Coca- cola was India’s leading soft rink unit in 1977.when it was ‘kicked
out’ of India after a new Janata Government when came to the power.
India after it refuse to reveal its secret formula of coca- cola and dilute its
stake in its Indian unit as required by the foreign exchange regulation Act.
On its return in 1993, it took over ownership of the nation’s top soft- drink
brands.it bought out for Rs3500 million a clutch of popular Indian soft
drinks brands including Thums up, Limca, Citra etc. which enabled them to
get 66% market share.
15. Cont.;
The vast Indian operation comprises 25 wholly company owned bottling
operations and another 24 franchisee owned bottling operations.
In India the company directly employees approximately 6,000 people and
indirectly creates employment for more than 125,000 people in related
industries though their vast procument,supply and distribution system.
15
16. Vision 16
• People: Beagreat place to work where peopleare
inspired to be the best they canbe.
• Portfolio: Bring to the world aportfolio of quality
beverage brands that anticipate and satisfy
people's desires and needs.
• Partners: Nurture awinning network of customers
and suppliers, together we create mutual, enduring
value.
17. Vision 17
• Planet: Bearesponsible citizen that makesa
difference by helping build and support sustainable
communities.
• Profit: Maximize long-term return to shareowners
while being mindful of our overallresponsibilities.
• Productivity: Beahighly effective, lean and fast-
moving organization.
18. Leadership: The courage to shape a better future
Collaboration: Leverage collective genius
Integrity: Be real
Accountability: If it is to be, it's up to me
Passion: Committed in heart and mind
Diversity: As inclusive as our brands
Quality: What we do, we do well
Values 18
19. The Coca Cola Company Mission
To refresh the world in mind, body
and spirit
To inspire moments of optimism and
happiness through our brands and
actions
To create value and make a
difference
19
28. Coca cola claim of ethical business
Code of business conduct- this code serve as guide to company’s actions,
advancing and protecting core values of honesty, Honesty, Integrity,
Diversity, Quality, Respect , Responsibility and Accountability.
Environmental policy: It promises to operate company`s facilities taking
into account all applicable environment safely and health rule.
28
29. Supplier Guiding principals
The Company expects supplier to follow the following principles
Built on the Compliance of Perfection: Company claims that it is built on
trust.
Good corporate citizenship for long term business success.
Share value as foundation of relationship.
Fair employment practice with employees with a commitment to human
right, at workplace.
29
30. Cont.’
Better communication with employees in local language and posted in a accessible place.
Provide better working environment within the organization.
Safe workplace with policies and practice in place.
Employ labor under legal working age and protection from unlawful abuse or harassment.
Compensate fair wages and benefits to employees.
The company expects suppliers to conduct business in a way that protect and preserve the
environment
30
31. Quality and promises
Keeping high quality promise in marketplace is their long term business
objective.
Coca cola is a brand of refreshment because of-
1. The symbol of quality
2. Customer and consumer satisfaction
3. A responsible citizen of the world
Company promises to provide consistently attractive return to the owners
and to their business.
31
32. Unethical practices by Coca Cola
Several complaints against company`s operations and its business:
Lack of transparency and Accountability:
The company is not listed on stock exchange. Unlisting enables flexibility to company to hide
their unethical decisions and wrong practices.
De-listing kills competition and hides true picture of unethical practices such as manufacturing
cost or pricing policies.
Company can escape the inspection of the investors, analyst and the media
32
33. Lack of Marketing Ethics
The company accused of adopting unethical marketing practices such as
Offering products/services against the interest of society.
Discrimination in pricing
Making tall claims in advertising
Misleading sales promotion
Targeting inappropriate audience like children
33
34. Unhealthy Practice
The company had provoked a no. of boycotts and protests as a result of
its perceived low health and hygiene standards and adverse impact on the
environment.
The contamination by high level of cadmium, lead and chromium found in
effluent sludge of 8 out of 16 bottling plants was much more in excess to
the acceptable central pollution control board(CPCB) standards.
The company has been the subject of allegation such as monopolistic
practices and racist employment practice
34
35. Unhealthy nature of Colas
FDA in Mumbai has advised school to ban the sale of colas, and also
prevent any advertisement of aerated drinks in their premises.
FDA commissioner Ramesh Kumar warms that soft drinks cause obesity
and tooth decay, besides posing other health risk due to presence of
chemical, such as Landane, a confirmed cancer causing chemical,
Malathion, DDT and Chlorpyrifos
American Epidemiologist reported that colas are associated with bone
mineral density loss and their consumption may increase osteoporosis risk
in older women
35
36. Excessive Water Usage 36
In India many states protested that coca-coal Is using
thrice of water used in production of a litre of cola. It is
been reported that farmers are facing acute shortage of
water causing crop failure. activists alleged that states
like uttar
Pradesh, kerala, rajasthan, Maharashtra are facing severe
shortage of water around establishment of coke bottling
plants.
37. kerala
In 1998,coca-cola`s bottling plant was set up at plachimada,Kerala. Local
villagers been complain of depleting water level for their cultivation.
Company dumped waste sludge on land of local farmer claiming it as
useful fertilizer. Research found that it contain toxic chemicals including
lead and cadmium.
On 15-01-2005,over 1000 people took part in blockading the entrance of
the plant to shut down permanently.
The day also marked 1000`th day anniversary of permanent dharna(vigil)
in front of factory gate.
The plant remained shut down over a year due to intense community
pressure.
37
38. Cont.
In other states almost the scene was same. there was one major issue
linked with every state and that was shortage of water for irrigation
process as water level drops to a significant amount.
38
39. Coca cola claim of ethical business
Code of business conduct- this code serve as guide to company’s actions,
advancing and protecting core values of honesty, Integrity, Diversity,
Quality, Respect , Responsibility and Accountability.
Environmental policy: It promises to operate company`s facilities taking
into account all applicable environment safely and health rule.
39
40. Supplier Guiding principals
The Company expects supplier to follow the following principles
Built on the Compliance of Perfection: Company claims that it is built on
trust.
Good corporate citizenship for long term business success.
Share value as foundation of relationship.
Fair employment practice with employees with a commitment to human
right, at workplace.
40
41. Cont.’
Better communication with employees in local language and posted in a accessible place.
Provide better working environment within the
organization.
Safe workplace with policies and practice in place.
Employ labor under legal working age and protection from unlawful abuse or harassment.
Compensate fair wages and benefits to employees.
The company expects suppliers to conduct business in a way that protect and preserve the
environment
41
42. Quality and promises
Keeping high quality promise in marketplace is their long term business
objective.
Coca cola is a brand of refreshment because of-
1. The symbol of quality
2. Customer and consumer satisfaction
3. A responsible citizen of the world
Company promises to provide consistently attractive return to the owners
and to their business.
42
43. Unethical practices by Coca Cola
Several complaints against company`s operations and its business:
Lack of transparency and Accountability:
The company is not listed on stock exchange. Unlist enables flexibility to company to hide their
unethical decisions and wrong practices.
De-listing kills competition and hides true picture of unethical practices such as manufacturing
cost or pricing policies.
Company can escape the inspection of the investors, analyst and the media
43
44. Lack of Marketing Ethics
The company accused of adopting unethical marketing practices such as
Offering products/services against the interest of society.
Discrimination in pricing
Making tall claims in advertising
Misleading sales promotion
Targeting inappropriate audience like children
44
45. Unhealthy Practice
The company had provoked a no. of boycotts and protests as a result of
its perceived low health and hygiene standards and adverse impact on the
environment.
The contamination by high level of cadmium, lead and chromium found in
effluent sludge of 8 out of 16 bottling plants was much more in excess to
the acceptable central pollution control board(CPCB) standards.
The company has been the subject of allegation such as monopolistic
practices and racist employment practice
45
46. Unhealthy nature of Colas
FDA in Mumbai has advised school to ban the sale of colas, and also
prevent any advertisement of aerated drinks in their premises.
FDA commissioner Ramesh Kumar warms that soft drinks cause obesity
and tooth decay, besides posing other health risk due to presence of
chemical, such as Landane, a confirmed cancer causing chemical,
Malathion, DDT and Chlorpyrifos
American Epidemiologist reported that colas are associated with bone
mineral density loss and their consumption may increase osteoporosis risk
in older women
46
47. Excessive Water Usage 47
In India many states protested that coca-coal Is using
thrice of water used in production of a litre of cola. It is
been reported that farmers are facing acute shortage of
water causing crop failure. activists alleged that states
like uttar
Pradesh, kerala, rajasthan, Maharashtra are facing severe
shortage of water around establishment of coke bottling
plants.
48. kerala
In 1998,coca-cola`s bottling plant was set up at plachimada,Kerala. Local
villagers been complain of depleting water level for their cultivation.
Company dumped waste sludge on land of local farmer claiming it as
useful fertilizer. Research found that it contain toxic chemicals including
lead and cadmium.
On 15-01-2005,over 1000 people took part in blockading the entrance of
the plant to shut down permanently.
The day also marked 1000`th day anniversary of permanent dharna(vigil)
in front of factory gate.
The plant remained shut down over a year due to intense community
pressure.
48
49. Cont.
In other states almost the scene was same. there was one major issue
linked with every state and that was shortage of water for irrigation
process as water level drops to a significant amount.
49
50. Corporate governance for Coca-Cola
Corporate governance policies include
1. Annual evaluation of the CEO’s performance and the board performance as a whole
2. Guidelines on how a director is determine to be independent from the Coca-Cola company
Ethical disputes handle by
1. Creating community programed world wide
2. Hiring public relations companies to contest disputes
3. Establishing complaint hotlines
50
51. Cont.
Company activities
1. Created programs for HIV and AIDS testing, treatment, and prevention in
Haiti and South Africa
2. Started using plantbottle
3. Reusing recycled cans and bottles
Coca- cola is also facing ethical issues;
1. Over consumption of water at overseas factories
2. Pesticides from water suppliers
3. Health concern (tooth decay, weight gain )
51
52. Question 1
The Cola controversy in India
A debate over water usage, accusation over pesticide content and
sweeteners, as well as more general concerns in India over the
unhealthiness of fizzy drinks are plaguing the brand.
“Coca-Cola has never been a stranger to controversy” says N
Chandramouli who is a brand expert and the chief executive of Trust
Research Advisory.
The boycott of Atlanta-based Coca-Cola and its rivals PepsiCo.
The ongoing battle between farmers and industries for water in India.
Coca-Cola being withdrawn from the country in1977.
Retailers can earn higher margins on local brands.
52
53. Cont.
It is a known fact that multi national companies like Coca-Cola and
PepsiCo adopt different standards when it comes to the use of materials in
their soft drinks.
Developed countries such as the united states of America sources inputs
with a higher standard in the production while developing countries like
India uses materials with a low quality.
The lower the quality of the materials used in the production, the higher
the risks associated.
53
54. Question 2
Firstly it is stated in the case study that the soft drinks are not the only
products that had shown pesticide residues greater than the permissible
values imposed by the European Union.
It was stated also that Cola companies have cited government surveys to
have revealed that day to day products such as milk having 3080 times
higher, vegetables having 69700 times higher and fruits having 111600
times higher pesticide residue.
Thus it would not unfair for just soft drinks to be banned.
54
55. In 2003 a non-profit organization, the Center for Science an Environment, pointed out that the carbonated drinks produced
by soft drink manufacturers in India including the multinational giants Coca cola an Pepsi co. contained toxins including
Lindane, ddt, malathion and chlorpyrifos. All which are pesticides that may contribute to the development of cancer and
breakdown of the human immune system.
CSE claimed to have found pesticide residues up to 36 times the levels permitted under European Union regulations in
Pepsi's soft drinks and 30 times the amount in Cola products. It also claimed that the same products tested in the united
states had no such residue.
With this bad publicity Coca – Cola had already registered a 15 percent drop in sales. Angered by this Coca Cola and
PepsiCo though firmly denied the validity of the claims made by the CSE. The companies launched an aggressive
campaigned against the study stating that it is unscientific an biased. They also accused the director of the CES of
‘brandjacking’( making use of the Cola brand name to draw attention to CES campaign.
All this let to the initiation of a political storm that in turn led to the initiation of a parliamentary committee to look into the
charges. The analysis carried out by this committee reported the confirmation of the claims made by the CES and were
praised for its findings.
This led to the increase of the regulations imposed by the government.
However Cola and PepsiCo continued to sell the products even though it was labeled dangerous. This was adequately
proved by an august 2006 study by the CES
55
56. In their defense Coca – Cola and Pepsi claimed their soft drinks to be safe and conform
to all Indian and international standards. They also argued that other foodstuff like tea
and milk also contain pesticide levels higher than that permissible but only their product
was getting all the unwanted attention.
While the arch rivals in the industry, coca cola and Pepsi worked together to prove the
CES findings to be unscientific and biased the general public seem to sympathize with
those affected by the unhealthy products.
This became a much larger problem when the American Ambassidor to india cautioned
that the bad reports and actions against cola companies would adversely affect
American investments in India.
Within india too there was some opposition to the move to ban the soft drinks. Their
were two parties, one against and the other for the banning of the product
The expert committee which reviewed the CES report on its second report said ‘The
committee has concluded that based on the information and data provided earlier and
subsequently by the CES, the results obtained cannot be accepted on its face value
and data provided ‘ and a ban was not imposed
56