What Makes An Effective Argument Ineffective?
Argument From Analogy Essay
Everythings An Argument Ethos Pathos Logos
What Is An Argumentative Passage Analysis
Everything Is An Argument
Argumentative Essay On Artificial Intelligence
What Makes A Successful Argument?
Argumentative Essay On Social Justice
Writing An Argumentative Essay
Writing An Argument Analysis
Fallacies To An Argument
Example Of An Argument Analysis
Argumentative Essay On Veganism
Argumentative Essay On The Holocaust
Othello : An Argumentative Essay
Argumentative Essay On Organ Donation
Argumentative Essay : Argumentative Writing
How to Write an Argument Essay
1. What Makes An Effective Argument Ineffective?
1.The basic parts of an effective argument are a stated clearly defined issue, makes a claim, and
offers support for that claim. Sometimes an argument may also recognize opposing viewpoints and
incorporate them into the argument
2.What makes an argument ineffective is when using emotional appeals to distract a reader from a
lack of evidence. Also the use of faulty reasoning, and inaccurate facts.
3.An issue is a problem, controversy, or an idea that people can have different viewpoints about.
The term claim is a point in which a writer is trying to prove. This is typically the writer's viewpoint
on the issue. A refutation is recognizing and auguring against opposing viewpoints.
4.A claim of value focuses on an opinion or judgment about
Get more content on HelpWriting.net
2. Argument From Analogy Essay
The argument from analogy is an inductive argument that focuses on the problem of other minds
and aims to show that we are justified in inferring the existence of other minds. British philosopher,
Bertrand Russell, describes the argument from analogy as follows: "The behaviour of other people
is in many ways analogous to our own, and we suppose that it must have analogous causes. What
people say is what we should say if we had certain thoughts, and so we infer that they probably have
these thoughts. They give us information which we can sometimes subsequently verify" (Russell,
"Analogy", p89). Norman Malcolm argues that the argument from analogy does poorly in its
attempts to show that we are justified in inferring the existence of other minds. In assessing whether
the argument from analogy succeeds in its aims, I will raise and respond to Malcolm's objection
against the argument from analogy; Austrian–born British philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein's 'Beetle
in a Box' thought experiment; as well as Welsh philosopher H. H. Price's argument and English
philosopher Stuart Hampshire's argument in defence of the argument from analogy....show more
content...
From subjective observation, Russell claims to know that A, which is a thought or feeling,
causes B, which is a bodily act (Russell, "Analogy", p110). Russell argues that believing in the
existence of other minds requires some postulate, and describes this postulate to be "If, whenever
we can observe whether A and B are present or absent, we find that every case of B has an A as a
causal antecedent, then it is probable that most B's have A's as causal antecedents, even in cases
where observation does not enable us to know whether A is present or not" (Russell, "Analogy",
Get more content on HelpWriting.net
3. Everything's An Argument Ethos Pathos Logos
Ethos, Pathos, Logos, The base of most arguments that we have. In Everything's an Argument
authors Andrea Lunsford, John Ruszkiewicz, and Keith Walters inform the audience of how there is
a relationship between ethos, pathos, logos and the writer, speaker, audience. In their writing
(chapter 1) argue that everything can be turned into an argument. They support their claim by first
telling about Michelle Obama's tweets about her concern of a kidnapping, by terrorist group Boko
Haram, of more than 200 Nigerian girls in 2014. Then by explaining how we make arguments. The
author's purpose is to inform readers about make arguments by using ethos, pathos, and logos.
Author's, Keith Walters, Andrea Lunsford, and John Ruszkiewicz, in Everything's
Get more content on HelpWriting.net
4. What Is An Argumentative Passage Analysis
What is an argumentative passage analysis?
In a passage analysis, you take some piece of written prose which contains an argument and extract
the argument from it. In order to do this, you must identify the conclusion of the argument, as well as
any premises that support the conclusion, and structure them in such a way that the argument is
clearly valid (if indeed it is valid in the passage).
Here is an example of an argumentative passage:
Socrates is a man, and all men are mortal. As such, Socrates is mortal.
Properly analysed, this passage could be put into premise–conclusion form as follows:
Socrates is a man.
All men are mortal.
в€
ґ Socrates is mortal.
That was an easy example. Sometimes it's more difficult to tell which claim is the conclusion and
which are the premises. Consider:
But of course, this argument is terribly misguided. After all, by any reasonable definition of the
word "human," an unborn child of any age is as much a human as you or me. That is why abortion is
never permissible. The aforementioned argument is right to say that it is never permissible to kill
humans, but wrong to say that fetuses are not humans.
This passage is much more difficult to formalize. The first problem we encounter is that it's not clear
which sentence contains the thesis. We may be tempted to look towards the first and last sentences
for a clue, but it seems unlikely that either of these is the main point being argued by the author. At
the very least, those do not seem to be the
Get more content on HelpWriting.net
5. Everything Is An Argument
After reading the chapter the phrase" everything is an argument" means to me any " text–written,
spoke, aural, or visual– that expresses a point of view" (Everything's an Argument, n.d.). Out of
chapter one; I chose Arguments to Make Decisions. Arguments to convince and persuade are similar
to it. Arguments to Make Decisions are all around us; like the elections, health care, constitutional
rights, and immigration Additionally,college students are also forced to make decisions. They have
to decide which major is the best one for them and their future.
When I think about Argument to Make Desicisons, and elections like it said in Chapter one. People
will listen to a candidate to present their case. And show evidence to support their assertions.
Get more content on HelpWriting.net
6. Argumentative Essay On Artificial Intelligence
Artificial Intelligence is a topic within the public media that has existed for decades, but is now a
concern due to the reality of human advancement and innovation in the field of science and
technology. Many people believe that computers will become self–aware or sentient and view
humanity as a disposable resource and gain supremacy. Reasoning that research on the technology
should halt and not become more advance. Whereas others believe they will help catapult research
and the economy forward, supporting the operations and innovations the technology offers. The
complicated and divided solutions to the debate aren't obvious, but there are more benefits to
improving artificial intelligence than there is stopping it. Therefore, the negative effects people
believe will occur can be resolved. There are different types of artificial intelligence that many
institutes and companies believe in. However, they all share the same belief of a self–aware,
conscious, human–like, computer system, the type of AI people fear. Disregarding that an AI is a
computer much like a phone or laptop, one must consider that if something is sentient like a person
or animal, should they be treated like one? And if not, is it discrimination or racism when it is
treated like an item? Slavery treated people based on race or social status differently, the bottom
being slaves. Some might argue that machines don't have a "soul" or aren't alive. There are hundreds
of questions and ideas that have no clear
Get more content on HelpWriting.net
8. Argumentative Essay On Social Justice
Oftentimes, the definition of social justice can be misinterpreted or misunderstood. The true
definition of social justice is often structured by governmental implications but is the fair and
proper administration of laws to each individual conforming to the natural law. Equality is
supposed to be equally distributed amongst individuals nationally, but can sometimes be taken
advantage of and be taken away from people who deserve it the most. Generally, those who view
social justices as a right, also value people above profits. Social justice describes the concept of
society where justice is achieved in every aspect of society, rather than just the administration of the
law. Overall, social justice gives society the ability to have a voice of laws that may be broken but
give a sufficient argument to be heard by the supreme court. Equality is a major issue that has
been demanded by society for centuries. In Victor Fleming's film The Way of All Flesh, released in
October of 1927, the story describes the life of Henrietta Lacks. Henrietta Lacks was an African
American woman from Baltimore who eventually died of cervical cancer in 1951. Before she died
some of her cancerous cells were taken without her permission and the cells have been
reproducing in laboratories around the world ever since. The question is, does taking the cells of a
woman who was eventually going to die break the laws of social justice, or was this a necessary
action to take in hopes of eventually finding a
Get more content on HelpWriting.net
9. Writing An Argumentative Essay
During this course I have learned there is in fact a great deal to writing. Throughout my lifetime I
have had to write numerous amounts of essays and papers for various subjects, all requiring
different styles and techniques. Before engulfing myself into the writing process I would try and
think of whom I am writing to and what I am writing about. I always just assumed I was writing for
my audience, that being my teacher. Writing an argumentative research paper is something I had yet
to accomplish in my college career. Not only was it thought provoking but this paper challenged me
in many ways, such as, knowing who I should be directing throughout the essay to as well as the
simple steps of organizing my thoughts and ideas. Also, simply reflecting on what information needs
to be apart of the essay and what doesn't.
While writing for academic reasons I would always write for the grade, not for the purpose to
write and truly convince the reader that what I am writing about is in fact important. I have
learned that when writing an argumentative research paper you are writing for an audience of
people not just to one person. You are writing to convince the reader why they should care about
the topic, and the reader should be able to feel that passion in your writing. You are writing to
broaden the thoughts regarding this topic to whom ever chooses to read your paper not just for that
grade. Thinking of who I should direct my paper to is something I still struggle with, however,
Get more content on HelpWriting.net
10. Writing An Argument Analysis
Fifth, I would like to discuss compare and contrast writing. This involves telling both sides, the
whole truth and not just one side of an argument. When presenting a formal argument it is most
effective when both sides of the argument are presented. The relativity of truth is the basis for
presenting both sides of an argument (Dunkle, 2000).
An example of this would be the quality of healthcare veterans receive from Department of Veterans
Affairs. Some feel that it has failed our veterans while others feel the VA has made changes to restore
faith in the VA. The VA has approximately 9 million veterans enrolled that are seeking healthcare;
many of these veterans have serious mental and physical health problems and often experience
treatment...show more content...
When writing a document it is helpful to follow some basic fundamentals in sentence structure and
word usage. It is helpful to keep sentence structure simple, to avoid ambiguity and use words the
reader understands. To assure success in writing it is also helpful to have a consistent point of
view, use a consistent verb tense (past, present or future), use parallel structure to emphasize the
theme and sound authoritative and use an active voice rather than a passive voice. Additionally the
tempo should be varied by using short and long sentences, avoid profanity and spell the words
correctly. I think using words that can be easily understood and not having misspelled words are the
most important in writing effectively. If there is doubt about a words being used then it should be
clearly defined. The message will be strong, effective and sound authoritative if these guidelines are
Get more content on HelpWriting.net
11. Fallacies To An Argument
Throughout this school year, I've learned that an argument it's the most common writing task, even
though people don't notice that they are using it. Frequently, the goal of a writing is to describe or
explain a point of view and support it with evidence. Indeed that is what makes an argument, to
have a claim and try to convince people by giving examples that help illustrate the reason why the
claim it's true or not. However, writing an effective argument can be challenging as it requires
strategies to be convincing, as well as consideration of how to formulate it in order to avoid
fallacies. On one hand, rhetorical strategies are necessary to write a persuasive argument; strategies
such as an appeal to logos, ethos, or pathos, rhetorical devices, etc....show more content...
Also, it is important to consider the subject, the occasion, the audience, the purpose, the speaker, and
the tone to ensure all of those connect adequately to each other and the message is delivered in a
right way. On the other hand, fallacies are very common within arguments since finding a
convincing justification can be difficult. Some fallacies dealing with tradition, patriotism, or
ethnicity go unnoticed due to the fact that people use it often, but it lacks validity and it makes the
argument weak. If one compares an argument to an analysis, the two are different since an argument
serves to prove a point of view while an analysis it's more similar to an evaluation of how authors use
rhetorical strategies. However, an argument and a synthesis essay are very similar, the only
difference it's that in a synthesis argument the evidence comes from sources and not the mind of the
writer. An argument can be difficult to write, but with the right rhetorical strategies, complexity such
as a concessions and a counterarguments, and precaution to avoid fallacies, it can be highly
Get more content on HelpWriting.net
12. Example Of An Argument Analysis
Prompt: "Can an argument really be any text that expresses a point of view? What kinds of
arguments–if any–might be made by... a Tesla Model S electric car...the health warnings on a
package of cigarettes"– Page 6 An argument can be anything from a Tesla to the health warnings on
a package of cigarettes. An argument is any text that expresses a point of view, since it's a point
of view there is no right or wrong. Anything we wear, say or hear reflects something about
yourself, whether you know it does, or not. While driving a Tesla, you're telling the people around
you several things; the price of the car tells them that you're willing to spend at least $70,000 on a
car. The message of driving an electric car is that you are conscious...show more content...
The health warning could be a warning by the FDA, against cigarettes. This is a more literal
example, because the warning states reasoning behind why someone shouldn't smoke cigarettes.
However, the cigarette companies can have a counterargument, by how they display this health
warning. If it is small and in the corner, they may be implying that this information isn't important, or
irrelevant. Also the verbal warning in commercials could be a counterargument to the argument of
the health warning. Some may see the health warning as a way to show those around them that they
don't care about the risks, and are dangerous. When a cigarette company states these warnings
quietly this could mean they do not think the listener need to know this, or they do not want the
user to hear the message. The FDA could fight back, by creating laws about how large this label has
to be, or at which speed this message must be read at. Recently in India, it has been the law for
cigarette packages to display an image that covers 85% of their packaging. (Ananthanarayanan,
"Cigarette Health Warnings: Size Matters.") In a counter argument, cigarette companies have
stopped production, to protest this
Get more content on HelpWriting.net
13. In order to have a good argumentative essay, there are a few important standards of critical
thinking that is needed to be found in the essay such as the clearness, accuracy, importance or
relevance, sufficiency, depth, breath and precision that is stated by Nosich. The strength of this
argumentative essay is consider weak because it does not capture the interest of the reader and
was not persuasive enough; even though from the introduction of the argumentative essay
includes full sentences and a good opinion, the argumentative essay is all objective. The
introduction includes too much of the emotional appeals, such as when it wrote " Day after day
the number of people worshipping this icon has been growing since the birth of this creature. well
to many it may seem harmless idol but in my opinion, Mickey Mouse is an 'devil in disguise'
influencing the minds of young and old people to adopt the culture of the 'devil' which doesn't
blend will with the moral values of society and should be banned". To improve the introduction, the
writer should include of all objectives statements relative facts and appeals to the mind of people
who agree or disagree with the topic.
Get more content on HelpWriting.net
15. Argumentative Essay On The Holocaust
The Holocaust
The Holocaust started in the 1933, when the Nazis and Adolf Hitler took power in Germany. The
Holocaust from the Greek words "holos" (whole) and "kaustos" (burned) cause chaos and tragedy
for Jewish people. At this time Germany was a nation with a Jewish population of 566,000 people.
Nazis thought that they were the most inferior race and no other race was better than the Aryan
race. This cause a lot of discrimination and hate against other people based on their beliefs and
looks. The Nazis provoked the outbreak of World War II, when they invaded Poland.The Holocaust
lasted 12 years and it end it on May of 1945.
The Holocaust was a disaster affecting many people's lives, mainly targeting Jewish people. They
were also against Poles, Gypsies, Russians, The Disabled, Jehovah's Witnesses and Homosexuals.
During the Holocaust six million Jews were murdered and many others were treated inhuman and
killed. People who were affected by the Holocaust were discriminated, segregated and hated. This
people were mistreated and their freedom was taking away, just by having different beliefs and
have a different looks. Around this time the Nazis came up with the term "The Final Solution"
This meant to have all Jewish people segregated and put into ghettos, limiting their freedom and
lives. People were evicted from their properties and also from their business just because they
were Jews, and they were put in the "ghettos". Life in the ghettos was unbearable and
overcrowding. Specially when they have ten families living in one small apartment. They were
also limited on the food that they could buy, since Nazis did not let them buy enough food for them
and their family they were only aloud to buy small amounts, they were trying to make the Jewish
starve. Jewish kids also sneak out through small openings in the ghetto walls to smuggle food, but if
they got caught they were going to be severely punished. The housing inside ghettos were unsanitary
specially when plumping broke down, and human waste was thrown in the streets along with
garbage and caused contagious diseases that spread rapidly in the ghettos. Many people died every
day in the ghettos because of the terrible conditions they lived and some
Get more content on HelpWriting.net
16. Othello : An Argumentative Essay
Othello: An Argumentative Essay
Inside each of us, there is a seed of good and evil since it is a constant struggle for us to determine
as to which one will win, so that is why one cannot exist without the other. However, there are some
whose emotions are unbalanced, which causes them to near towards one side more than the other
one ВВ and many times the side a lot of people prefer to lean on is evil. Shakespeare's play O thello
is set in 16thВcentury Venice and Cyprus.Othello, a noble black general from the Venetian army has
secretly married Desdemona, daughter of Venice senator Brabantio. Othello chooses inexperienced
Cassio to be his lieutenant, while he decides to give the ensign position to Iago, a malicious but very
experienced man who, with his stealth and knavery, will ultimately ruin almost everyone's life
since for a long time, he was desiring the position of lieutenant just like Cassio. At the end of the
play, Othello, Desdemona, Iago's wife Emilia, and his sidekick Roderigo die due to his revenge
against Cassio, for obtaining the position he wanted and Othello, for being the man who he hates
the most. The play ends with Iago being told that he will be punished and tortured for his actions.
However, despite the fact that Iago is punished at the end of the play for doing all of the malicious
things he did, he still manages to wear down Othello's relationship with Desdemona, get Cassio
demoted from his lieutenancy, and cause Othello to show his cowardness by
Get more content on HelpWriting.net
17. This material set–off in this fashion in the handout identifies the revision notation for these matters.
Guidelines for the Argumentative/Persuasive Essay
Citing Sources
You are not to employ footnotes or endnotes in your essay. Rather, when you employ another's ideas
or quote from a source in your essay, please employ the Modern Language Association, "MLA,"
format for in–text citations; the format is set forth in Keys, p. 144 et seq.
Quoting, Citing, and Referencing Source Material
Please also review the material on summarizing, paraphrasing, and quoting material set forth in Keys,
p. 122–25.
Works Cited Page
Given that your essays will contain references to sources that were employed in constructing the
arguments in...show more content...
Con Argument
1.First Con Argument Paragraph: Precis
Summarize the con argument and cite to its expert source with credentials
2.Second Con Argument Paragraph: Example of the Con Argument
3.Third Con Argument: Refutation
Discredit the reliability of the con argument or demonstrate that it is in appositive or irrelevant to the
topic by challenging its source, timeliness, authorship, or logic. For additional information, please
review the Refutation Handout available under Course Documents. C. First Pro Argument
1.First Pro Argument Paragraph: Precis
Summarize the first pro argument and provide its expert source with credentials.
2.Second Pro Argument Paragraph: Example of the Pro Argument
3.Third Pro Argument Paragraph
Establish the reliability of the argument by employing one or more of the seven types of evidence
discussed in Bedford, p. 518.
D.Analogy Paragraph: See the Analogy Handout available under Course
Documents for additional information
E.Most Compelling Reason to View the Pro Position as the Superior Position on the Topic
Paragraph Based upon Belief, Value, Social Mores, or Tradition. For additional information, please
review the Most Compelling Reason Handout available on Blackboard. III.Conclusion A. First
Conclusion Paragraph
1. Summarize the essay in a one to two–sentence "restatement"
2.Either discussion of the greater implication of the
19. Argumentative Essay On Organ Donation
The medical industry had been achieving more in the stage of medical advancements, though they
are still in the early phase. Artificial organs have been one of those achievements. Although they
have achieved such, artificial organs are not perfect. Most doctors as well as patients would prefer
to replace a dying organ with a compatible human organ, rather than with an artificial or animal
organ. Yet due to a there being less organs donated than recipients, artificial and animal organs are
becoming more common in transplants. Most of this issue is because people are unaware of how
organ donation works, the organs that can be donated, how many people are in need, and the
advancements that have happened in the field. Organ donation saves hundreds of lives every year,
but many lives are recklessly lost due to a shortage of organ donors.
Organ donation is the medical process of voluntarily giving one or more of your organs to
someone in need, whether it be someone you know or a stranger. It is strictly voluntary, no
payment for the organ/s will be given from the hospital, the recipient or the recipients family. In
organ donation, there are two types of donations, living organ donation and deceased organ
donation. Living organ donation is when the donor is still alive and voluntarily chooses to donate
one or more of their organs to a recipient(s) in need. Whereas, deceased organ donation happens
after the donor has passed away, and consent was given to be able to donate their organs.
In living organ donation, before a donor can donate there are tests administrated to see if the donor is
suitable to donate. There is an evaluation of the donor done to make sure that no physical,
psychological, or emotional harm will happen to them before, during, or after donating
(Organdonor.gov U.S. Government Information on Organ Donation and Transplantation). In living
organ donation, most donations happen within family members, or between close friends, although
there are stranger donations that happen. Living organ donors should generally be physically fit, in
good health, and between the ages of 18 to 60. They should not have a history or have diabetes,
cancer, high blood pressure, kidney disease, or heart disease
Get more content on HelpWriting.net
20. Argumentative Essay : Argumentative Writing
As long as humanity has differentiated view points, there will be the need for argument. Whether
the argument is about who will be the next leader of a free country or as simple as whether or not
you bleed AC Milan Rosso or Internazionale Azzurro in Milano, argument allows people to have
discussions while trying to prove each other wrong or convince someone to change their views.
Under the umbrella of arguing there is a very intelligent method to argue that is called
argumentative writing. With argumentative writing a person can put all of their ideas into an
organized, well developed paper that attracts and engages a reader. While most people prefer
arguing in person, one is susceptible to interruptions from the opposing side or as well as having
to think on the fly and keep their train of thought going while constantly countering what the
opposition is saying; but with argumentative writing one can freely express all their ideas without
opposition until a person is finished reading their paper. That being said, argumentative writing
can be looked at metaphorically like a dance. To explain, when you see another person at a club or
an event that you think is cute, you have to engage them in an icebreaking conversation. Then
when the house band or DJ starts playing you ask the person to dance. While dancing you have to
keep up with the beat and keep your partner actively engaged with the music. If you begin to slip up
or lose the beat, your partner can become disinterested
Get more content on HelpWriting.net
21. How to Write an Argument Essay
How to Write an Argument Essay There are five main steps. Step 1: Read the essay Read the
question. Decide what kind of essay it is – opinion, compare/contrast, problem and solution, cause
and effect, or a mixture. The type of question will decide the layout and your ideas. Step 2:
Underline Underline key vocabulary in the question and write words with the same or related
meaning. This will really save you a lot of time later on. It will also help to avoid repetition of
words, and will show that you understand the question. Vocabulary 1: Read and Underline Key
Words Should governments spend money on space exploration, or should they spend the money on
problems here first? 2: Write Down Other Words with the Same Meaning...show more content...
| |Seven/eight sentences |Argument 1 or Reason 1 | | |Example, Explanation, or supporting detail | |
| | | | | | |Argument 2 or Reason 2 | | |Example, Explanation, or supporting detail | | |Argument 3 or
Reason 3 | | |Example, Explanation, or supporting detail | | |Summary sentence for Para 2 |
|Paragraph 3 |Topic Sentence
Get more content on HelpWriting.net