13. We’ve just practiced analyzing & synthesizing compositions (images are
compositions!), inferring what the compositions “try to say”, i.e., the point of
the images. In the first case, what do the three images say?. In the second
case, we tried to figure the meaning of the single image “Cotton Bowl”.
Your claim, in either case, is “What does this set of images or single image
say?” A second level of analysis is to evaluate that claim, i.e., judge the
quality of what the compositions say. On one level, it’s about stating, with
clarity, what the composition expresses; then, we judge that expression:
Does the author overstate the case? How important is the author’s ideas?
Does the author miss something or include something irrelevant?
Analysis & Synthesis
Editor's Notes
Parter/Write: Identify the three elements of “panopticonism”
Invisible
Judges/Measures
Internalize - identify with that which judges . . . takes on judgement
Parter/Write: Identify the three elements of “panopticonism”
Invisible
Judges/Measures
Internalize - identify with that which judges . . . takes on judgement