Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
Similar to Systematic Review Mapping of Software for Flying Phobia Treatment
Similar to Systematic Review Mapping of Software for Flying Phobia Treatment (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Systematic Review Mapping of Software for Flying Phobia Treatment
- 1. LITERATURE REVIEW,SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW,Systematic Mapping Review LR,SLR,SMR Presented by : Habiba Abderrahim and Hedi Ayedi
- 2. OUTLINE Introduction Literature Review Systematic Literature Review Systematic Mapping Review 01 02 03 04 Conclusion 05
- 4. 02 What is a REVIEW Summary Independent (re)assessment Reviewing
- 5. WHY WE WRITE A REVIEW ?
- 7. Evidence ● Establish facts ● understand what works, where, why and for whom ● Transparent way
- 8. Therefore…
- 9. Literature Review Systematic review Systematic mapping review
- 11. LR Literature review A literature review discusses published information in a particular subject area, and sometimes information in a particular subject area within a certain time period
- 12. Provides an overview for Board Topic Literature review It might give a new interpretation of old material or combine new with old interpretations It might use potentially Biased resources Sometimes evidence Based
- 13. Therefore…
- 14. literature review and a scientific research paper A research paper is likely to contain a literature review as one of its parts. Academic research paper is used to develop a new argument
- 15. The depth and breadth of the literature review provide a solid background for a research paper’s investigation. Features of literature reviews For scholars For professionals Overview useful reports that keep them up to date with what is current in the field. Provide you with a handy guide to a particular topic
- 17. Brief History SRs are typically used in clinical research and social sciences, they have found application in various other subject areas outside of healthcare as a way of comprehensively and systemically summarizing existing research.
- 18. SRs GENERAL DEFINITION Systematic reviews aim to find as much as possible of the research relevant to the particular research questions, and use explicit methods to identify what can reliably be said on the basis of these studies.
- 19. Therefore … For Reliable results
- 20. Inclusion/Exclusio n Criteria Decide the Topic Decide the research question How To conduct SRs ? Data Search Database search Where you will find published / unpublished Data Screening Data ● Screen with titles and abstract ● Screen with Full Text Data Extraction Start Writing ● P : Population ● I : Intervention ● C :Comparison ● O:Outcome ● characteristics that must be included ● characteristics that disqualify prospective subjects Phenom of interest
- 21. Tips :What we must Do ?
- 22. The Research question Problem/Population Comparison Intervention Outcome P I C O Framing questions for a review
- 23. The Research question Overweight children Physical exercise Healthy Eating programmes Reduce BMI P I C O School-based healthy eating programmes and physical exercise to reduce BMI in overweight children
- 24. HOW and WHERE Describe the steps promotes transparency of methods road map for your review Criteria of selection Protocol Method used for data analysis
- 25. 1.Purpose: To identify softwares that helps to make the treatment of specific phobias more effective, especially for people with flight phobias without complex treatment procedures or the burden of multiple therapies. 2.Research questions: Specific phobia patient experiences of treatment procedures ? How can we use new technologies in Specific Phobia treatment ? What are the softwares that treat Flying Phobia ? What are the solutions that fit best to treat Flying Phobia ? Can Virtual environments be applied in specific phobia Treatment ? What are the best scenes to integrate into VR solutions ? 3.Keywords: specific phobia , SPD ,software , technology ,mental disease , Flying phobia , research , virtual reality , situations 4.Synonyms: Specific phobia Disorder : SPD, Virtual reality:VR Protocol Example
- 26. 5.Sources/digital libraries: IEEE Digital Library Google Scholar pubMed 7.Inclusion criteria: ● Language English ● Publication date ● Human subject of any age ● Hospitalised person ● Published / unpolished report 8.Exclusion Criteria: ● Arachnophobia or any specific phobia other than flying phobia. ● Healthy person
- 28. The fundamental principle of systematic research synthesis Features of Systematic Review Quality Check Reduces bias Transparent conclusions are not over-influenced by studies which are simply the easiest to find Quality and relevance made clear
- 30. SRs Motivation of Systematic Map Study A mapping review aims at categorizing, classifying, characterizing patterns, trends . The point in conducting a mapping review is to "map out" and thematically understand the pre-existing research on a particular topic including assessing any gaps that could be addressed by future research.
- 31. Outcome Can Produce primary research
- 32. clear target When is a Mapping Review appropriate? It might give a new interpretation of old material or combine new with old interpretations More focused evidence product has not yet been identified There is pre-existing literature, for investing if there are gaps
- 33. CONCLUSION 05
- 34. Literature Review , Systematic Review
- 35. ● Both are secondary studies ,their source information is Primary studies. Systematic Review , systematic Map ● Their Methods are very similar but the Goals are different ● Mapping reviews are similar to systematic reviews in that they have a systematic search and screening component
- 36. ● https://www.elsevier.com/connect/authors-update/why-systematic-reviews-matter ● https://www.nihlibrary.nih.gov/services/systematic-review-service/systematic- review-protocols-and-protocol-registries ● https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895435620310945 ● https://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?tabid=69 ● https://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?tabid=67 ● https://www.slideshare.net/alessio_ferrari/systematic-literature-reviews-and- systematic-mapping-studies ● https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/computer-science/systematic-mapping- study References
- 37. Assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews: PRISMA [https://prisma-statement.org/]
- 38. Thanks! Do you have any questions?
Editor's Notes
- We will first get an idea of what a review means, then locate some common review design, including SLR and SMR, and see how to conduct one, giving an example.
- Textual summary of a large Topic Independent (re)assessment of published research:U combine information and write one paper out of them You are reviewing what has been done before
- No why we need to write a review ?
- There many reasons one of them is the Contradictory
- Evidence consists of facts that we use in support of a conclusion. They help us understand what works, where, why and for whom.
- We need a reliable reviews that are evidence base Where there is Accountability and transparency to inform a new study or get an overview
- They are 3 main review design that are :
- LR or called Traditional Review
- -1- not a specific question 4-the literature review may give an advise to the reader on the most pertinent or relevant. —->Here we are using it may / sometimes because when you write a LR those are an optional thing Not mandatory in LR Even the method and result may be optional in LR
- There is no guidelines to checklist to suit , So for exemple if we 10 decide to write a LR in the same topic We may have 10 different let’s say structure since there no guidelines ,this why it’s also called Traditionnal review
- you use the literature as support for a new insight that you contribute. The focus of a literature review, however, is to summarize and synthesize the arguments and ideas of others without adding new contributions.
- 1 ) If you have limited time to conduct research, literature reviews can give you an overview or act as a stepping stone.
- Based on the characteristic of literature review cited by hedi , for transparency and for more eligibility we need a new review study design that is systematic like a system u follow something
- Meaning that in future, health researchers will have a higher chance to identify and use existing systematic reviews for justifying and designing their new study.
- It’s a system Follow steps that are mentioned by a system Guidliness / checkList
- What the review is about U dived the question on 3 P , C , C However the question in scoping review is a little broader ley’s say not very focused
- Framing questions for a review is very important since it’s what you research is based on So it should be clear, structured, and objective. So you avoid missing some relevant studies.
- Intervention research is all about learning what treatments or strategies work best to improve outcomes and making a difference in what matters most to people.
- a good systematic review can start with a protocol - it can serve as a road map for your review a protocol specifies the objectives, methods, and outcomes of primary interest of the systematic review a protocol promotes transparency of methods allows your peers to review how you will extract information to quantitavely summarize your outcome data What is a protocol?
- Now we will put those steps into a protocol that can be registered later in specific websites 2- population , the context we are try to improve (the user experience ) , context (traditional treatment procedure) We didnt say new since uality assessment in SC not esstienl
- In order to review existing works in this field, a s search was completed using the following databases: PubMed, ProQuest, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. By reviewing the article, each author then applied the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and 18 articles were selected. Type of the person
- conclusions are not to be over-influenced by studies which are simply the easiest to find
- Based on Mapping review you can came with new / primary research after finding let’s say the Gaps
- To summarize we will use a comparative tables to make things easier to recap
- This is from a paper ofc all need
- the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses