Literature Review

1,139 views

Published on

Published in: Technology, Education
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
1,139
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
20
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
44
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • The Literature Review is a critical component of the action research project. It enables the researchers to see what other research has been done in their area of interest. It also gives credibility to the action research study by showing what research serves as a foundation for the current study.
  • Literature Review

    1. 1. Action Research The Literature Review
    2. 2. Proposal <ul><li>Question for Study </li></ul><ul><li>Review of Literature – peer-reviewed journal articles and research studies that support your intervention, tools, etc. (a minimum of 10 citations) </li></ul><ul><li>Strategy or Intervention proposed </li></ul><ul><li>Data collection tool(s) – Reliability/Validity </li></ul><ul><li>Work plan </li></ul>
    3. 3. Issues to Address in Proposal <ul><li>The study clearly looks at the impact on student learning </li></ul><ul><li>The study is based on previous research </li></ul><ul><li>Permission is received prior to the study from the building administrator, the parents, and the students </li></ul><ul><li>Logical plan for implementation </li></ul><ul><li>Extraneous variables are controlled as much as possible </li></ul>
    4. 4. Review of Literature--Defined <ul><li>Generally, the purpose of a review is to analyze critically a segment of a published body of knowledge through summary, classification, and comparison of prior research studies, reviews of literature, and theoretical articles. </li></ul>
    5. 5. Writing the Introduction <ul><li>Define or identify the general topic, issue, or area of concern providing a context for the review </li></ul><ul><li>Point out overall trends; conflicts in theory, methodology, evidence, and conclusions; or gaps in research; or a single problem or new perspective </li></ul><ul><li>Establish the writer’s point of view for the review, the criteria to be used for analyzing and comparing literature, and the organization of the review; and, when necessary, state why certain literature is or is not included </li></ul>
    6. 6. Writing the Body <ul><li>Group studies and other types of literature according to common denominators such as qualitative vs. quantitative, conclusions of authors, specific purpose or objective, chronology, etc. </li></ul><ul><li>Summarize individual studies according to their comparative importance in the literature, remembering that space denotes significance </li></ul><ul><li>Provide the reader with strong “umbrella” sentences at beginnings of paragraphs, “signposts” throughout, and brief “so what” summary sentences at intermediate points in the review to aid in understanding comparisons and analyses </li></ul>
    7. 7. Writing the Conclusion <ul><li>Summarize major contributions of significant studies and articles to the body of knowledge under review, maintaining the focus established in the introduction </li></ul><ul><li>Evaluate the current “state of the art” for the body of knowledge, pointing out major methodological flaws or gaps in research, inconsistencies in theory and findings, and areas or issues pertinent to future study </li></ul><ul><li>Conclude by providing some insight into the relationship between the central topic of the literature review and a larger area of study such as a discipline or the profession in general </li></ul>
    8. 8. 10 Questions For Your Lit. Review <ul><li>1. What do we already know in the immediate area concerned? </li></ul><ul><li>2. What are the characteristics of the key concepts or the main factors or variables? </li></ul><ul><li>3. What are the relationships between these key concepts, factors, or variables? </li></ul><ul><li>4. What are the existing theories? </li></ul><ul><li>5. Where are the inconsistencies or other shortcomings in our knowledge and understanding? </li></ul>
    9. 9. 10 Questions Cont. <ul><li>6. What views need to be (further) tested? </li></ul><ul><li>7. What evidence is lacking, inconclusive, contradictory or too limited? </li></ul><ul><li>8. Why study (further) the research problem? </li></ul><ul><li>9. What contribution can the present study be expected to make? </li></ul><ul><li>10. What research designs or methods seem unsatisfactory? </li></ul>
    10. 10. Traps to Avoid <ul><li>Trying to read everything! </li></ul><ul><li>Reading but not writing! </li></ul><ul><li>Not keeping bibliographic information! </li></ul>
    11. 11. Final Note <ul><li>A literature review is a piece of discursive prose, not a list describing or summarizing one piece of literature after another. It’s usually a bad sign to see every paragraph beginning with the name of the researcher. Instead, organize the literature review into sections that present themes or identify trends, including relevant theory. You are not trying to list all the material published, but to synthesize and evaluate it according to the guiding concept of your research question. </li></ul>
    12. 12. Supports <ul><li>www.hope.edu/lib </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Ref Works </li></ul></ul><ul><li>www.oaisd.org—REMC7—Research Tools </li></ul><ul><ul><li>First Search </li></ul></ul>

    ×