1. The document summarizes a case study of developing a climate adaptation plan for Bergrivier municipality in South Africa through a collaborative process between multiple levels of government and stakeholders.
2. A key opportunity was aligning the municipal adaptation plan with national and provincial climate policies to mainstream adaptation into local development planning.
3. An iterative process of co-production between provincial government, municipal leaders, scientists, and local practitioners built adaptive capacity across groups and supported the development of a climate adaptation plan integrated into the municipal development plan.
Ziervogel Paris #CFCC15 Co-producing an adaptation plan 2015
1. Opportunities for municipal climate adaptation:
aligning local adaptation plans with provincial and
national policy in South Africa
Gina Ziervogel, Penny Price and Emma Archer
gina@csag.uct.ac.za
Department of Environmental and Geographical Science and African Climate & Development Initiative,
University of Cape Town
2. Overview
• Opportunities and enablers of municipal scale adaptation
governance
• Importance of co-production for building adaptive capacity
across scale
• Case study: Development of Bergrivier municipality climate
adaptation plan
3. Opportunities for municipal climate
change governance
• Growing literature on institutional barriers to adaptation
governance
• Important to understand opportunities and enablers
“factors that make it easier to plan and implement adaptation actions,
that expand adaptation options, or that provide ancillary co-benefits”
Klein et al. (2014: 907)
• Local government key to supporting opportunities
• Provide resource/change planning (Biesbroek et al. 2013; Measham et al.
2011)
• Access to multiple stakeholders
• Connects to national and international (Pasquini et al. 2014; Bulkeley 2010)
4. Building adaptive capacity through co-
production
• Nature of co-production
• Experts from science, policy, practice and local communities (Bulkeley
2006)
• Importance of developing contextually relevant strategies (Corburn
2009)
• Co-production as part of adaptation
• Focus on process and capacity critical given slow uptake of
adaptation implementation (Kates et al. 2012; Tompkins et al 2010)
• Reflexive engagement between research and practice (Patel et al.
2015)
• Social capital is needed to draw on multiple knowledges and work
collectively (Armitage et al. 2011)
5. Western Cape Government
Climate Change Municipal Support Programme
• Support for local & district municipalities to development & implement
climate adaptation plans
• New programme, 1st
year = 4 Municipalities
• Partnerships
• Bergrivier councillors and officials
• Local community / NGO representation
• CSIR
• CSAG
• ACDI
6. Process: Bergrivier municipality
• Formal solicitation of interest for involvement
• Presentation to mayoral committee to achieve buy-in
• 3 in-situ workshops
• Draft adaptation plan
• Initial draft by Provincial official
• Input from scientists
• Finalisation by Bergrivier officials
• Integration of climate change adaptation plan into IDP
7. Workshop 1 (Oct 2012) Workshop 2 (Nov 2012) Workshop 3 (Jan 2013)
Current vulnerability Climate change
vulnerability (impacts
and prioritisation)
Developing adaptation
options
Key climatic events in
Bergrivier
Key sectors and
activities
High
temp Flood
Erratic
rainfal
l
Heavy
winds
Infrastructure -
Roads
L M L L
Infrastructure -
Structures /
buildings
M L L M
Infrastructure -
Low income
housing
M H L M
Infrastructure -
Storm water
L H H M
Service delivery -
Water
M M L L
Service delivery -
Electricity
M M L M
8. UCT ACDI Interdisciplinary process
• A diverse group of practitioners and academics
• A facilitated process of investigation into climate and development
in Bergrivier over 2 years
9.
10. 1: Policy opportunity - Mainstreaming climate
adaptation into development planning
National Climate Change Response Policy (2011)
Clearly outlines the
need for local
government to
integrate climate
change
considerations and
constraints into
municipal master
planning, e.g. IDP
Western Cape Climate Change Response Strategy
Climate Adaptation
Work Group reports on
mainstreaming
adaptation into
municipal planning and
operations
Climate Change
Municipal Support
Programme reported
on under Annual
Performance Plan
Bergrivier Municipality
Integrated Development Plan (2013)
Climate Change
Adaptation Plan
integrated into
IDP
Bergrivier Municipality Climate
Change Adaptation Plan (2014)
Focus areas: Mainstreaming climate
change governance into municipal
governance; Climate resilient low cost
housing; Stormwater; Conservation of
natural resources (focus on clearing
alien invasive vegetation); Agriculture
11. 2: Policy opportunity – Flexibility of process
• Province’s measurable outcome:
• “Climate adaptation mainstreamed into local level municipal
planning and operations”
• Iterative feedback between the provincial and local levels
• Limited resources
Source: //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexibility; http://www.area15.es/wp-content/uploads/bombilla-mundo.jpg
12. 3: Capacity opportunity – Collaborative and
entrepreneurial government leaders
• Public managers critical role in ‘catalysing’ knowledge
production and providing leadership (Maiello et al. 2013;
Termeer et al. 2012)
• Collaborative leadership
• Municipal “champion”’s limited knowledge of climate change
adaptation
• Entrepreneurial leadership
• Provincial “champion” with strong social capital
13. 4: Capacity opportunity – Diverse
group of stakeholders
PROVINCIAL
GOVERNMENT
MUNICIPAL
GOVERNMENT
SCIENTISTS
LOCAL
PRACTITIONERS
14. Conclusion: Supporting co-production
to build adaptive capacity
• Importance of leveraging opportunities
• Cross scalar policy alignment
• Capacity
• Aligned with development priorities
• Co-production
• Supported because of social capital
• Built adaptive capacity across groups
• About a process not a destination
15. Paper under review with Environment and Urbanization.
Please contact me for a copy.
Gina@csag.uct.ac.za
@GinaZiervogel
Editor's Notes
Co benefits important in context of Current development pressures (Ziervogel et al. 2010); Interaction of multiple stressors (O’Brien et al. 2009)
Meet multiple stakeholder needs
Adaptation action in local municipalities
Limited capacity and skills
Supported by planning
Multiple stakeholders
How we came together. The Wcape are supporting municipalities in implementation of adaptaiton plans. This is a one year programme to begin with and they have targetted 4 keen muncipalities. The Berg River is one of those and it is a bit of a special case because there is a partnership on the project in the region. In the partnersship there is obviously the BR munc but also importantly the local community is involved in the process. CSAG got involved because we are really interested in finding out how we can better support the bridge between science and society. Particuylarly how we can better support the robust use of climate information. Our involveent in this process meant that we could see first hand the challenges of the munc and build a relationship that would be oingoing with them. CSIR got involved through a funded project in the Berg River that nicely complimented the work going on. Finally ACDI is a subsidiary partner to the process – i’ll talk more about this later.
Frstly, in roder to get buy in fromt he munic. Penny wanted to make sure that they were keen to be involved. We needde a commitement from them before we could do anything, otherwise the process would have faile.d So the BR expressed an interest and was selected as a muncp to focus on. Then to progress the process further, there was a presenattion to the mayoral committeee about what we intended to do. This establised a committmenet fromt eh mayoral committee to host, attend and support the 3 workshops. They knew the format of each of the workshops at that stage and were able to provide input if they wanted to. This is crucial becuase you can’t just race in and impose, it is a joint effort. We were incredibly lucky with Tracey - climate change officer at Berg who is very committed to the process and enthusiastically enabled our interaction.
3 workshops – 3 stages of the adaptation wizard/ 1 current culnerability . Many people raised concerns about how relevant climat echange was but we tried not to even talk about climat echange that day. A lot of people liked the approach and left with an “Uh ha” moment. We had most attendence that day and the 2nd and 3rd workshops had less attendance but more dedicated. I think it is a lesson to expect to lose some people along the way. Second workshop we introduced climate change and how those vulnerabilities m ight change and the 3rd workshop we started to investigate adaptation. I’m going to run through each of the workshops in slightly more detail now.
We started by now talking about climate at all actually. We asked them to identify stressors of the region. Any stressors. Things that they found were challeneges to them. We hypothesised that some of these stressors may interact with climate strongly and some may not at all. They came up with a long list of stressors and then we gave them each, I think, 4 sticky dots and asked them to vote for their top 4. They could put all 4 dots on one if they felt really strongly. In this way we priotised the stressors in the area. The stressors identified were .................
Then we took these stressors and ran a brainstorming exercise about how these stressors may be affected by climate. We left them on that note at the end of workshop 1.
Rydin –
Small municipality
Access to scientists (Corburn )
Historical relationships
Focus on applied work
This started off being “the number of Municipal Adaptation Plans developed within a three year period”. After one year of implementation, this shifted to “the number of municipalities supported over a five year period”, with “Municipal Adaptation Plans” being one of the measurable outputs. This shift in indicator reflects the move away from the development of Adaptation Plans as the ultimate goal, to a more extended goal of providing support to municipalities to mainstream climate change into their master plans.
This started off being “the number of Municipal Adaptation Plans developed within a three year period”. After one year of implementation, this shifted to “the number of municipalities supported over a five year period”, with “Municipal Adaptation Plans” being one of the measurable outputs. This shift in indicator reflects the move away from the development of Adaptation Plans as the ultimate goal, to a more extended goal of providing support to municipalities to mainstream climate change into their master plans.