11. Figure 9
Flow-volume loop of pressure ventilation
with a descending ramp flow
patternInspiration is represented by the
curve above the baseline and expiration by
the curve below the baseline.
Expiration
13
13. Types of Waveform Abnormalities
Auto PEEP
Flow Desynchrony
Trigger Desynchrony
Cycle Desynchrony
Air Leak
15
14. Figure 10
Auto-PEEP on a flow-time curveWhen the
expiratory curve doesn't return to baseline
before the next inspiration, the patient has
auto-PEEP.
16
A ventilator-initiated mandatory breath (A) is characterized by positive
pressure rising immediately at the beginning of inspiration. In contrast,
a patient-initiated mandatory breath (B) has a negative deflection at the
beginning. PEEPe is set at 5 cm H2O in this example
The square waveforms are characteristic of pressure-control ventilation.
In this example, PEEPe is set at 5 cm H2O. Pressure rising directly from
the baseline (A) indicates a ventilator-initiated breath. A small negative
deflection before the second positive-pressure rise (B) suggests a patientinitiated
breath.
Compare a spontaneous breath without pressure support or PEEPe (A) to
one with pressure support of 10 cm H2O (B). Note the rapid rise of pressure
to the predetermined level of pressure support, which gives the
inspiratory portion of waveform B a square shape.
A normal volume-time curve is shown in (A); in (B), the expiratory curve
hasn’t returned to baseline, indicating an air leak from the ventilator’s
expiratory limb or auto-PEEP. In (C), the expiratory curve drops below the
baseline because of active exhalation or inaccurate calibration of the flow
transducer.
The square flow pattern (A) leading to a higher PIP and shorter inspiratory
time may be seen in volume-control ventilation. Curves (B) and (C) show
decelerating and descending ramps, respectively, which are associated
with lower PIP and longer inspiratory time. They occur in pressure-control
and pressure-support ventilation. The sine waveform (D) may increase
PIP and may be used in volume-control ventilation.
The loop starts at the zero point and is plotted clockwise
The loop starts at the set PEEPe of 5 cm H2O and travels
counterclockwise.
The patient’s effort produces a small “trigger-tail”
waveform on the left side of the PV loop at the
beginning of inspiration. PEEPe is set to 5 cm H2O.
Inspiration is represented by the curve above the baseline and expiration
by the curve below the baseline.
When the expiratory curve doesn’t return to baseline before the next
inspiration, the patient has auto-PEEP.
A flow-volume loop that doesn’t close on the inspiratory curve indicates
auto-PEEP.
Compare the convex inspiratory curve representing normal, adequate
flow (A) to the concave inspiratory curve with a drop in airway pressure
(B) indicating flow dyssynchrony (also called flow starvation).
The concavity in the inspiratory curve suggests that
airflow isn’t adequate to meet patient demand.
In this example, the figure-eight appearance of the
loop suggests flow dyssynchrony.
Note the negative deflection (the patient’s breathing effort), which isn’t
followed by a rise in positive pressure above the baseline because of an
insensitive sensitivity setting.
Because of auto-PEEP, the patient’s effort can’t trigger the ventilator.
The pressure spike (A) at the end of inspiration on a pressure-time curve
indicates that the patient started exhaling before the ventilator cycled
to expiration. Shortening the inspiratory time by adjusting the cycling
criteria (B) eliminated the pressure spike.
Compare the negative deflections indicating patient effort: Minor patient
effort is needed to trigger a mandatory breath (A), an ineffective effort
elicits no ventilator response (B), and increased patient effort is needed to
trigger a mandatory breath because of an insensitive sensitivity setting (C).
An increase in the size of the “trigger tail” means that
the patient must make a greater effort to trigger the
ventilator because of an insensitive setting.
In this waveform, A and C are spontaneous breaths; B
is the ventilator being triggered without patient effort.
The mode is pressure-support ventilation at 10 cm H2O.
A decrease in PEFR on a flow-time curve suggests an air leak from the
ventilator circuit’s expiratory limb, or increasing airway resistance.
In this waveform, the decrease in PIP suggests an air leak from the
ventilator’s inspiratory limb, or a decrease in airway resistance.
Delivered tidal volume less than set tidal volume indicates an air leak
from the ventilator’s inspiratory limb.
The expiratory curve on this loop doesn’t return to the
starting point, suggesting an air leak of 100 mL.
The same 100-mL expiratory air leak on an FV loop,
again indicated by the expiratory portion of the loop
not closing at the zero point.
Auto-PEEP that causes active patient exhalation is
shown as a negative deflection on the volume-time
curve because the exhaled volume exceeds the
inspired volume.
Before-and-after waveforms showing how effective
bronchodilator therapy reduces airway resistance. In the
pressure-time curve (top), PIP falls. In the flow-time
curve (middle), PEFR rises and auto-PEEP is decreased.
Expiratory time is reduced in the flow-time and volumetime
curves (bottom).
The dashed line shows decreased PEFR on an FV loop, indicating
increased airway resistance. Effective bronchodilator therapy increases
PEFR and restores the expiratory curve to a more linear shape (solid line).
A patient-initiated breath (breakthrough breathing) at the 4-second mark
on this waveform indicates that neuromuscular blockage is inadequate or
is tapering off. The mode is volume-control ventilation.
The normal PV loop, shown as a solid line, widens or bows (dashed line)
when the patient’s airway resistance increases.
Decreasing lung compliance reduces the slope of a PV
loop (dashed line); improving compliance increases the
slope (solid line).