The document describes two scenarios - Scenario S and Scenario X. Scenario S is the preferred alternative and focuses on creating mixed-use centers around major transportation areas like transit hubs. It plans for a few regional centers and many neighborhood centers to provide close access throughout the area. Scenario S results in lower vehicle miles traveled, higher walk/bike and transit use, and reduced transportation emissions compared to Scenario X. Scenario X continues current trends with less dense, more auto-oriented development and no regional transit.

1. Scenario S: Preferred Alternative

6. Scenario X: Basecase

9. Comparing Scenario S and X Scenario X: Basecase Scenario S: Preferred Alternative

10. Total Population

11. Total Housing Units

12. Total Jobs

13. Developed Acres % of site

14. Vehicle Miles Traveled (per person per day)

15. Walk/Bike Trips (% of Total)

16. Daily Transit Ridership

17. Transportation Emissions (CO2) Tons of CO2 per Year

18. Transportation Emissions (CO2) Tons of CO2 per Year Per Capita

19. Transportation Energy Use Gallons of Gas per Day per Person

20. Jobs-Housing Balance

21. Housing Mix Comparison Scenario X continues current trends, Scenario S anticipates future demographic shifts and changing housing needs.

22. Employment Mix Comparison

23. Building Emissions (CO2) Annual CO2 (ton/yr) Building emissions are lower in Scenario X because employment buildings use more energy

24. Building Emissions (CO2) Annual CO2 (ton/yr) Per Capita Building emissions are lower in Scenario X because employment buildings use more energy

25. Total Water Demand (Gallons/day - Building and Landscaping)

26. Total Water Demand (Gallons/day - Building and Landscaping) Per Capita