Scenario Transportation Highlights
This slideshow highlights the range of transportation alternatives and outcomes for each of the four PLANiTulsa scenarios ...
How the Scenarios Compare Tulsa’s transportation investments go almost entirely to roads   New Road Investments New Transi...
31,000 Daily Transit Trips <ul><li>1% Transit share in ridership  </li></ul><ul><li>Limited regional transit in Tulsa area...
How the Scenarios Compare About 41% of transportation investments are devoted to transit New Road Investments New Transit ...
Scenario B
How the Scenarios Compare About 41% of transportation investments are devoted to transit New Road Investments New Transit ...
Scenario C
How the Scenarios Compare Most transportation investments are devoted to transit New Road Investments New Transit Investme...
Scenario D
How the Scenarios Compare Investment priorities will have a have a big impact on how Tulsans get around
How the Scenarios Compare Each scenario also has a big impact on how much time Tulsans will spend in the car
Transportation New Lane-Miles of Road Constructed Scenario A would result in more total lane miles than the others.
Transportation Lane Miles of New Road Per 1,000 New Residents On per-capita basis, Scenario A would require more new roads...
Transportation Per Capita Vehicle Miles Traveled (City) Scenarios B, C, and D would result in Tulsans driving fewer miles ...
Transportation Gallons of Fuel Wasted Annually Due to Congestion Scenarios B and D would result in the least amount of fue...
Transportation Citywide Value of Time Lost Due to Congestion  (Annually, in millions) Scenarios B and D would result in th...
PLANiTULSA Transportation Element <ul><li>Excerpted presentation from PLANiTulsa’s transportation consultant, Kimley-Horn ...
Citywide Workshop Findings <ul><li>Participants were interested in seeing </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Economic Development large...
Regional Survey Results
PLANiTulsa Survey Results <ul><li>  </li></ul><ul><li>Level of satisfaction with Tulsa’s transportation system: </li></ul>...
Source: US Census (2000) How Tulsans Get Around Town
http://www.cornelius-tulsa.com/Misc._-_Downtown.jpg Source: Tulsa: INCOG (2006) Albuquerque: Mid-Region COG (2000) Charlot...
Metro Population: 729,649 City Population: 448,607 Transit Ridership: 8,751,698 Total Lane Miles: 2,334 Albuquerque, NM
Metro Population: 1,330,448 City Population: 540,828 Transit Ridership: 21,176,801 Total Lane Miles: 1,274 http://www.ligh...
Source: National Transit Database (2006) Transit Indicators:  Ridership Comparison
Metro Population: 968,858 City Population: 181,743 Transit Ridership: 38,594,690 Total Lane Miles: 864 2007 Recipient Amer...
Tulsa San Francisco Salt Lake City Boston Network Design
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/107/315072192_27861ff3e4.jpg?v=0 Cost of Transportation
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/107/315072192_27861ff3e4.jpg?v=0 <ul><li>Highway and Roadway Network Capacity </li></ul><ul...
POTENTIAL TRANSPORTATION TOOLS Street Level Urban Redesign Potential corridors for this tool
Low Congestion = Flexibility in Design
Gridley, California: State Highway 99
Street Level Urban Redesign <ul><li>A redesign can do many things to improve the function, appearance and safety of a road...
Four-Lane Undivided Roadway Conversion to a Three-Lane Cross Section  are viable for roadways with a maximum ADT of 16,000...
Cotati, California: Old Redwood Highway looking north
Highway Urban Redesign: Example:  Seoul, South Korea
http://www.cornelius-tulsa.com/Misc._-_Downtown.jpg Volume/Capacity Analysis: Lanes with Level of Service D or Worse
Regional Commuter Rail Commuter rail service connects the large master planned communities around the region, the surround...
Rapid Transit Technologies Bus Rapid Transit has the unique ability to function in either an exclusive right-of-way or in ...
The following slides summarize a variety of transportation improvements that Tulsa could potentially use over the next 30 ...
Bus Rapid Transit <ul><li>BUS RAPID TRANSIT </li></ul><ul><li>Functions in exclusive R.O.W. to increase efficiency </li></...
Express Bus <ul><li>EXPRESS BUS CORRIDOR </li></ul><ul><li>Functions in mixed traffic </li></ul><ul><li>Station spacing: ½...
Light Rail <ul><li>LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT </li></ul><ul><li>Functions in exclusive R.O.W. or in traffic </li></ul><ul><li>Stat...
Commuter Rail <ul><li>COMMUTER RAIL </li></ul><ul><li>Functions in exclusive R.O.W. on owned or existing freight rail line...
Irvine Streetcar <ul><li>STREETCAR </li></ul><ul><li>Functions in mixed traffic </li></ul><ul><li>Station spacing: ¼ mile ...
Roadway Widening <ul><li>COMMUTER CORRIDORS </li></ul><ul><li>Access managed principal arterials </li></ul>Source: Dan Bur...
Irvine New Roadway
Irvine Multi-Modal Street Design <ul><li>MULTI-MODAL CORRIDORS </li></ul><ul><li>Emphasis in bicycle and pedestrian infras...
Irvine Multi-Use Path
Transit Oriented Development <ul><li>TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT </li></ul><ul><li>Higher density development </li></ul><...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Transportation Highlights

601 views

Published on

This presentation is designed to provide a more detailed look at the transportation investments envisioned for each scenario. It also includes some analysis and information presented at the citywide transportation workshop. This is intended to provide more detailed information, and isn’t necessary to complete the survey.”

Published in: Business
0 Comments
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total views
601
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
6
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
13
Comments
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Transportation Highlights

  1. 1. Scenario Transportation Highlights
  2. 2. This slideshow highlights the range of transportation alternatives and outcomes for each of the four PLANiTulsa scenarios Comparing the Scenarios
  3. 3. How the Scenarios Compare Tulsa’s transportation investments go almost entirely to roads New Road Investments New Transit Investments
  4. 4. 31,000 Daily Transit Trips <ul><li>1% Transit share in ridership </li></ul><ul><li>Limited regional transit in Tulsa area </li></ul><ul><li>Trend ridership for 2030: </li></ul>Scenario A
  5. 5. How the Scenarios Compare About 41% of transportation investments are devoted to transit New Road Investments New Transit Investments
  6. 6. Scenario B
  7. 7. How the Scenarios Compare About 41% of transportation investments are devoted to transit New Road Investments New Transit Investments
  8. 8. Scenario C
  9. 9. How the Scenarios Compare Most transportation investments are devoted to transit New Road Investments New Transit Investments
  10. 10. Scenario D
  11. 11. How the Scenarios Compare Investment priorities will have a have a big impact on how Tulsans get around
  12. 12. How the Scenarios Compare Each scenario also has a big impact on how much time Tulsans will spend in the car
  13. 13. Transportation New Lane-Miles of Road Constructed Scenario A would result in more total lane miles than the others.
  14. 14. Transportation Lane Miles of New Road Per 1,000 New Residents On per-capita basis, Scenario A would require more new roads for fewer new residents.
  15. 15. Transportation Per Capita Vehicle Miles Traveled (City) Scenarios B, C, and D would result in Tulsans driving fewer miles than Scenario A.
  16. 16. Transportation Gallons of Fuel Wasted Annually Due to Congestion Scenarios B and D would result in the least amount of fuel wasted due to traffic congestion
  17. 17. Transportation Citywide Value of Time Lost Due to Congestion (Annually, in millions) Scenarios B and D would result in the least amount of lost time due to traffic congestion.
  18. 18. PLANiTULSA Transportation Element <ul><li>Excerpted presentation from PLANiTulsa’s transportation consultant, Kimley-Horn and Associates </li></ul><ul><li>Preparing the PLANiTulsa Transportation Element includes 3 components: </li></ul><ul><li>Public participation (hands-on and survey) </li></ul><ul><li>Technical Analysis </li></ul><ul><li>Local expert input </li></ul>
  19. 19. Citywide Workshop Findings <ul><li>Participants were interested in seeing </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Economic Development largely in existing centers </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>A balance of jobs and housing </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>More infill development </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Transit investment with housing and jobs nearby </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Improvements to existing roads </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>More multi-family and small-lot housing options </li></ul></ul>
  20. 20. Regional Survey Results
  21. 21. PLANiTulsa Survey Results <ul><li>  </li></ul><ul><li>Level of satisfaction with Tulsa’s transportation system: </li></ul><ul><li>Very satisfied 27% </li></ul><ul><li>Somewhat satisfied 43% </li></ul><ul><li>Not satisfied 29% </li></ul>
  22. 22. Source: US Census (2000) How Tulsans Get Around Town
  23. 23. http://www.cornelius-tulsa.com/Misc._-_Downtown.jpg Source: Tulsa: INCOG (2006) Albuquerque: Mid-Region COG (2000) Charlotte: Kimley-Horn & Associates (2000) Salt Lake City: Wasatch Front Regional Council (2005) Comparison: Roadways and Transit
  24. 24. Metro Population: 729,649 City Population: 448,607 Transit Ridership: 8,751,698 Total Lane Miles: 2,334 Albuquerque, NM
  25. 25. Metro Population: 1,330,448 City Population: 540,828 Transit Ridership: 21,176,801 Total Lane Miles: 1,274 http://www.lightrailnow.org/images02/sj-lrt-inaugural-trn-ar-Downtown-Campbell-stn-pax-20051001x_Peter-Ehrlich.jpg http://www.uncc.edu/admissions/tour/downtown.html Charlotte, NC
  26. 26. Source: National Transit Database (2006) Transit Indicators: Ridership Comparison
  27. 27. Metro Population: 968,858 City Population: 181,743 Transit Ridership: 38,594,690 Total Lane Miles: 864 2007 Recipient American Planning Association “Great Streets” Designation: South Temple Street Salt Lake City, UT
  28. 28. Tulsa San Francisco Salt Lake City Boston Network Design
  29. 29. http://farm1.static.flickr.com/107/315072192_27861ff3e4.jpg?v=0 Cost of Transportation
  30. 30. http://farm1.static.flickr.com/107/315072192_27861ff3e4.jpg?v=0 <ul><li>Highway and Roadway Network Capacity </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Many opportunities for redesign and construction to achieve higher performance </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Multi-modal Demand </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Opportunity for street scale urban redesign of arterials that will create new economic opportunities </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Transit Capacity </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Potential for increased commuter transit along congested freeway corridors and new transit markets </li></ul></ul>Technical Findings
  31. 31. POTENTIAL TRANSPORTATION TOOLS Street Level Urban Redesign Potential corridors for this tool
  32. 32. Low Congestion = Flexibility in Design
  33. 33. Gridley, California: State Highway 99
  34. 34. Street Level Urban Redesign <ul><li>A redesign can do many things to improve the function, appearance and safety of a roadway. It can be accomplished by: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>- Removing lanes from a multi-lane roadway </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>- 4 lane to 3 lane conversions </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>- Create parking and/or bike lanes out of existing lanes </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>- Widening sidewalks to encourage pedestrian activity </li></ul></ul>Potential Transportation Tools
  35. 35. Four-Lane Undivided Roadway Conversion to a Three-Lane Cross Section are viable for roadways with a maximum ADT of 16,000. They have been accomplished up to 24,000 ADT. Street-scale Urban Redesign
  36. 36. Cotati, California: Old Redwood Highway looking north
  37. 37. Highway Urban Redesign: Example: Seoul, South Korea
  38. 38. http://www.cornelius-tulsa.com/Misc._-_Downtown.jpg Volume/Capacity Analysis: Lanes with Level of Service D or Worse
  39. 39. Regional Commuter Rail Commuter rail service connects the large master planned communities around the region, the surrounding towns and villages, and even nearby cities, with the urban core. Potential Transportation Tools
  40. 40. Rapid Transit Technologies Bus Rapid Transit has the unique ability to function in either an exclusive right-of-way or in mixed traffic, however, the most common application assumes an exclusive right-of-way for operational efficiency and safety. E 71 st Street Potential Transportation Tools
  41. 41. The following slides summarize a variety of transportation improvements that Tulsa could potentially use over the next 30 years. Potential Transportation Tools
  42. 42. Bus Rapid Transit <ul><li>BUS RAPID TRANSIT </li></ul><ul><li>Functions in exclusive R.O.W. to increase efficiency </li></ul><ul><li>Station spacing: 1-2 miles </li></ul>Source” http://www.streetsblog.org
  43. 43. Express Bus <ul><li>EXPRESS BUS CORRIDOR </li></ul><ul><li>Functions in mixed traffic </li></ul><ul><li>Station spacing: ½ Mile </li></ul><ul><li>Intelligent system operation </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Priority & Preemption </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Real-time transit information systems </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>GPS tracking </li></ul></ul>www.itsdocs.fhwa.dot.gov
  44. 44. Light Rail <ul><li>LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT </li></ul><ul><li>Functions in exclusive R.O.W. or in traffic </li></ul><ul><li>Station spacing: 1-2 miles </li></ul>
  45. 45. Commuter Rail <ul><li>COMMUTER RAIL </li></ul><ul><li>Functions in exclusive R.O.W. on owned or existing freight rail lines </li></ul><ul><li>Station spacing: 2-5 miles </li></ul>Source: http://fdot-srtna.c-b.com/fdotdocumentreview/PressPackage.htm
  46. 46. Irvine Streetcar <ul><li>STREETCAR </li></ul><ul><li>Functions in mixed traffic </li></ul><ul><li>Station spacing: ¼ mile </li></ul>Source: Chris Phan/Flickr
  47. 47. Roadway Widening <ul><li>COMMUTER CORRIDORS </li></ul><ul><li>Access managed principal arterials </li></ul>Source: Dan Burden
  48. 48. Irvine New Roadway
  49. 49. Irvine Multi-Modal Street Design <ul><li>MULTI-MODAL CORRIDORS </li></ul><ul><li>Emphasis in bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure </li></ul><ul><li>Connected pathways and bikeways </li></ul><ul><li>Increases ability to use alternative modes to reach destinations </li></ul>Source: CompleteStreets.org
  50. 50. Irvine Multi-Use Path
  51. 51. Transit Oriented Development <ul><li>TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT </li></ul><ul><li>Higher density development </li></ul><ul><li>Pedestrian friendly </li></ul><ul><li>50% reduction in trips during peak hours </li></ul>

×