1
CPD research
Student name
Instructor name
Course title
Date
Introduction
Training department has been experiencing a decline in the attendance of the nurses to the CPD activities for the last two years. Based on this decline, it is important as a training department to look forward examining some of the factors that might have led to the decline. Therefore, a survey which involves a cross sectional study design was mandatory to investigate these factors. The primary aim of the survey was to collect data using questionnaires on what motivated the nurses to attend the continuing professional development (CPD) activities along with the impact of these activities on the nurses’ performance as they perceived. The department will be trying to find strategies that will enhance CPD participation. However, the finding will be used to improve attendance and planning the next year continuing professional activities annual plan. The research managed to collect qualitative data. The dependent variables are variables that change based on other variables, thus these variables are the questions asked to the respondent such as what motivated them to undertake CPD activities, the strategies they consider to enhance their CPD activities and how these strategies impact their learning including their colleagues and organization and also how they can measure the impact of the CPD they attended on their growth and development and effectiveness of the strategies identified. The independent variables are variables that do not change based on other variables. In this case, the independent variables are the responses from the participants.
Research questions
There were four research questions. These are as follows;
· What motivates them to undertake CPD activities?
· What strategies do they consider in enhancing your CPD activities?
· How these strategies made impact on their as a learner, to their colleagues or the organization in which they work?
· How do they measure the impact of the CPD they attended on their growth and development and the effectiveness of the strategies identified?
Research hypothesis
Hypothesis
The hypothesis is the proposed explanation with limited evidence that guide the research by giving it a starting point. In most cases, the research consist of two hypotheses, this include null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis. The null hypothesis is the hypothesis that has no significant difference between the specified populations while alternative hypothesis is the hypothesis that has a significant difference between the specified populations.
Hypothesis one
Null hypothesis: There is no significant difference between the respondent views.
Alternative hypothesis: There is a significant difference between the respondent views.
Or
H0: μr=μr where r represent respondent views
H1: μrμr
Hypothesis two
Null hypothesis: There are no significant factors led to decline in the attendance of the nurses to the CPD activities for the last two ...
1. 1
CPD research
Student name
Instructor name
Course title
Date
Introduction
Training department has been experiencing a decline in the
attendance of the nurses to the CPD activities for the last two
years. Based on this decline, it is important as a training
department to look forward examining some of the factors that
might have led to the decline. Therefore, a survey which
involves a cross sectional study design was mandatory to
investigate these factors. The primary aim of the survey was to
collect data using questionnaires on what motivated the nurses
to attend the continuing professional development (CPD)
activities along with the impact of these activities on the
nurses’ performance as they perceived. The department will be
trying to find strategies that will enhance CPD participation.
However, the finding will be used to improve attendance and
planning the next year continuing professional activities annual
plan. The research managed to collect qualitative data. The
dependent variables are variables that change based on other
variables, thus these variables are the questions asked to the
respondent such as what motivated them to undertake CPD
activities, the strategies they consider to enhance their CPD
2. activities and how these strategies impact their learning
including their colleagues and organization and also how they
can measure the impact of the CPD they attended on their
growth and development and effectiveness of the strategies
identified. The independent variables are variables that do not
change based on other variables. In this case, the independent
variables are the responses from the participants.
Research questions
There were four research questions. These are as follows;
· What motivates them to undertake CPD activities?
· What strategies do they consider in enhancing your CPD
activities?
· How these strategies made impact on their as a learner, to
their colleagues or the organization in which they work?
· How do they measure the impact of the CPD they attended on
their growth and development and the effectiveness of the
strategies identified?
Research hypothesis
Hypothesis
The hypothesis is the proposed explanation with limited
evidence that guide the research by giving it a starting point. In
most cases, the research consist of two hypotheses, this include
null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis. The null hypothesis
is the hypothesis that has no significant difference between the
specified populations while alternative hypothesis is the
hypothesis that has a significant difference between the
specified populations.
Hypothesis one
Null hypothesis: There is no significant difference between the
respondent views.
Alternative hypothesis: There is a significant difference
between the respondent views.
Or
H0: μr=μr where r represent respondent views
H1: μrμr
3. Hypothesis two
Null hypothesis: There are no significant factors led to decline
in the attendance of the nurses to the CPD activities for the last
two years.
Alternative hypothesis: There are significant factors that led to
decline in the attendance of the nurses to the CPD activities for
the last two years.
Or
H0: μ=0
H1: μr0
Methods of analysis
Based on the method used to collect data and the type of
data collected, the method of analysis that will be appropriate to
this research will involve both qualitative and quantitative
research. Qualitative analysis involves describing the responds
given by the respondent while quantitative analysis involves
gives information based on numbers. Therefore, we shall
convert the qualitative data collected to quantitative data to
carry out quantitative analysis. One sample test will be used to
test the significant of the questions and descriptive statistics
will be used to identify the answers that have more response.
Also; the statistical tool that will be used to analyze the data
will be SPSS (Savin-Baden, 2014).
Results output
One-Sample Statistics
N
Mean
Std. Deviation
Std. Error Mean
What motivates you to undertake CPD activities?
11
4. 22.7273
19.73875
5.95146
What strategies do you consider in enhancing your CPD
activities?
11
9.0909
8.23959
2.48433
How these strategies made impact on you as a learner, to your
colleagues or the organisation in which you work?
10
14.6000
9.47746
2.99704
How do you measure the impact of the CPD you attended on
your growth and development and the effectiveness of the
strategies identified?
16
13.9375
14.95089
3.73772
One-Sample Test
Test Value = 0
t
df
Sig. (2-tailed)
Mean Difference
95% Confidence Interval of the Difference
5. Lower
Upper
What motivates you to undertake CPD activities?
3.819
10
.003
22.72727
9.4666
35.9879
What strategies do you consider in enhancing your CPD
activities?
3.659
10
.004
9.09091
3.5555
14.6263
How these strategies made impact on you as a learner, to your
colleagues or the organization in which you work?
4.871
9
.001
14.60000
7.8202
21.3798
How do you measure the impact of the CPD you attended on
your growth and development and the effectiveness of the
strategies identified?
3.729
15
.002
13.93750
5.9707
21.9043
6. Descriptive Statistics
What motivates you to undertake CPD activities?
What strategies do you consider in enhancing your CPD
activities?
How these strategies made impact on you as a learner, to your
colleagues or the organization in which you work?
How do you measure the impact of the CPD you attended on
your growth and development and the effectiveness of the
strategies identified?
N
Valid
11
11
10
16
Missing
9
9
10
4
Minimum
4.00
2.00
4.00
1.00
Maximum
64.00
28.00
34.00
7. 44.00
Bar graphs
The central tendency of the first question is 22.7273 which
is higher as compared to other questions. This implies that most
individuals respondent to the first questions. Also, the first
question had a high standard deviation which means that there
were more spread response to the question as compared to
others. Based on the result of one sample t test, the degree of
freedom of the questions were, 10,10,9 and 15 respectively. The
P-value of all the questions are 0.003, 0.004, 0.001 and 0.002
respectively. These P-values are less than 0.05, which means
the questions were all significant. Thus we shall reject the null
hypothesis for hypothesis one and accept alternative hypothesis
which says that there is a significant difference between the
respondent views (Verma, J. 2013).
Furthermore, based on descriptive statistics the maximum
values represent the question that had more response as
compared to other questions. Also, the bar graphs displays the
highest bar shows the most preferred needs by the nurses.
Therefore, most of the individual claimed that the motives that
made them to undertake CPD activities was the updates
knowledge and skills and closely followed by the collection of
CPD credit points. Also, most of the respondent considered
reading and reviewing internet in enhancing their CPD
activities. However, these strategies impacted most of the
individual’s knowledge and skills updates and improved and
increased competency. The measure of impact of the CPD
attended by every individual on their growth and development
along with the effectiveness of the strategies identified had a
significant difference. Based on the results, most of the
8. respondent claimed that it has improved the quality of care such
as work patient care, efficient in patient care and less patient
incident and admission. In addition, other claims that CPD has
helped to apply the new practice to clinic. From these results,
the null hypothesis will be rejected and we conclude that there
are significant factors that led to decline in the attendance of
the nurses to the CPD activities for the last two years.
Conclusion
The aim of the research was to collect data using
questionnaires on what motivated the nurses to attend the
continuing professional development (CPD) activities along
with the impact of these activities on the nurses’ performance as
they perceived. This was due to the decline in attendance by
nurses to CPD activities. We therefore realize most of the
nurses were motivated by update knowledge and skills. Also; we
shall incorporate the reading and review from internet to
capture the nurses’ attention to attend the CPD training. These
strategies helped most of the nurses to gain knowledge and
skills updates and increased their competency in working.
Previously, the measure of CPD was rated as a tool to improve
quality of care including work patient improvement, efficient in
patient care and less patient incident and admission.
Reference
Verma, J. (2013). Data Analysis in Management with SPSS
Software. doi:10.1007/978-81-322-0786-3
Savin-Baden, M., & Wimpenny, K. (2014). Issues of Analysis,
9. Intepretation and Representation. A Practical Guide to Arts-
related Research, 63-79. doi:10.1007/978-94-6209-815-2_5
3 Exemplary
2 Proficient
1 Basic
0 Does not Meet
Requirements
Introduction
Clearly and concisely states the research purpose and scenario.
Includes details of study inclusion/exclusion, sample size, type
of data collected (measurement level), independent variables,
dependent variables to be assessed, and study design.
***Includes credit of source of data set
States the research purpose and scenario in general. Includes
only some of the details of study inclusion/exclusion, sample
size, type of data collected, independent variables, dependent
variables to be assessed, and study design. ***Includes credit of
source of data set
States the research scenario and purpose of the study. Lacks
sufficient detail to understand the rational for and the design of
the study. ***Includes credit of source of data set
Fails to include research scenario and study purpose
***Excludes credit of source of data set.
Hypotheses
Clearly states the Null and research Hypotheses in terms of the
research undertaken. Also includes the Null Hypothesis and the
Research Hypothesis in mathematical terms
Clearly states the Null and Research Hypotheses in terms of the
research undertaken.
States the Null and Research Hypotheses in mathematical terms
only
Does not correctly state the Null and Research Hypotheses
Method of Analysis –
Selection
10. The selected method of data analysis fits the data type
(measurement level).
The Method of analysis was not correct for the data type and
study design.
Method of Analysis – Write up
The data analysis method that was selected was defined. The
rational for the method of analysis selected was explained as
related to the data set analyzed and the study design.
The data analysis method that was selected was defined but no
justification for use was included
No explanation of the method of data analysis selected was
given.
Method of Analysis – Running the Analysis
SPSS was used to analyze the data. All necessary tests of
assumptions were run correctly. The correct decisions were
made from these preliminary tests. If needed transformations
were employed and assumption tests rerun. The subsequent data
analysis process was run correctly as assessed by the output
tables and graphs provided in the paper.
The main statistical analysis test was run correctly using SPSS.
No evidence of preliminary assessment of the data was provided
in the paper. Or the Preliminary assessment was incorrect or
incomplete.
The main data analysis was run incorrectly using SPSS or the
data analysis was run correctly or incorrectly while NOT using
SPSS.
Results - Visual
All tables and graphs generated by the assumptions tests and the
analyses are correct and included. All tables and graphs are
labeled to explain what is in the table or graph. Tables and
graphs are presented in the order in which they are discussed in
the Results – Write-up Section.
11. All tables and graphs generated by the main analyses are
included and are correct. Some labels are missing or incorrect.
Tables and graphs are not presented in the order in which they
are discussed in the Results – Write-up Section.
Some tables and graphs generated by the main analyses are not
included or are incorrect due to errors in analysis or method of
analysis selection. Labels are missing or incorrect. Tables and
graphs are not presented in the order in which they are
discussed in the Results – Write-up Section.
Results – Write-up
A complete write-up of the results presented as tables and
graphs is included. All tables and graphs are explained. All test
statistics, degrees of freedom, p-values, effect sizes, measures
of central tendency, measures of variability, statement of Null
Hypothesis rejection or acceptance. A meaningful interpretation
of the results is included
A semi-complete write-up of the results is included. Some but
not all of the test and data information are included. A
statement of Null Hypothesis rejection or acceptance is
included. A meaningful interpretation of the presented results is
included.
The write-up includes only the most basic of information (Test
statistic, test statistics, degrees of freedom, and p-values). A
statement of Null Hypothesis rejection or acceptance is
included. A meaningful interpretation of the results is included
but limited.
The write-up includes only the most basic of information (Test
statistic, test statistics, degrees of freedom, and p-values).
There is limited to no interpretation.
Conclusion
A restatement of the research question is included. A decision
(as found in the analysis) is written. A final assessment of what
the findings mean is provided
A decision (as found in the analysis) is written.
12. Conclusion statement lacks a restatement of the research
question and a final assessment of what the findings mean.
Supplied data set by 11-17-14
Yes
No
Grading Explanation:
Your project will be graded objectively according to the rubric
provided. If you complete the project by following the
directions and including all components in their highest level of
completion, you will receive an A on this project.
Points:
Points will be awarded if the objectives are met.
Points are 3 Exemplary
2 Proficient
1 Basic
0 Does not meet requirements
Total points possible = 27
Grades:
Grades will be converted to a 100 point scale
A = 27-25
B = 24-22
C = 21-19
D = 18-17
F = 16 and below
Point Deductions:
-5 points if the project is not typewritten in a word
document
-5 points if the project is not organized as designated
-3 points if tables and graphs are not placed into the
manuscript in the visual format identical to the SPSS output
13. (To make this happen if you are still having problems, Right
click on the table/graph and copy special. Select picture
and then paste to Word as a picture. Once this is done, use the
corners of the picture to make it smaller to fit)
-2 points if the tables and graphs are split between 2
pages. (see above for directions to copy a picture and scale it
down)
-1 point for no name on the project
***You must attach a copy of this rubric to your project.
-2 points if rubric is not attached