Annotated Bibliography (Students)
[ref: Webspace.edu.au]
It is a list of research sources that includes concise descriptions and evaluations of each source. The annotation usually contains a brief summary of content and a short analysis or evaluation.
I. CITATION. Use a proper format (IEEE or APA style). Cite the article exactly as it should be in a bibliography.
II. SUMMARY. Sum up the important points in the article.
1. Why authors research is significant or Why is it an interesting or useful problem?
2. What is the aim or objective of their research?
3. What are the key results of authors? (e.g. A>B)
3. What are their contribution to science?
III. CRITIQUE
2. What is the purpose for writing the article or doing the research?
3. To what audience is the author writing? Is it intended for the general public, scholars, policymakers, teachers, professionals, practitioners, etc? Is this reflected in the author’s style of writing or presentation? How so?
4. Does the author have a bias or make assumptions upon which the rationale of the publication or the research rests?
5. What method of obtaining data or conducting research was employed by the author? Is the article based on personal opinion or experience, interviews, library research, questionnaires, standardized personality tests, etc.?
6. At what conclusions does the author arrive?
7. Does the author satisfactorily justify the conclusions from the research or experience? Why or why not?
8. How does this study compare with similar studies? Is it in tune with or in opposition to conventional wisdom, established scholarship professional practice, government policy, etc.? Are there specific studies, writings, schools of thought, philosophies, etc. with which this one agrees or disagrees, and of which one should be aware?
9. Are there significant attachments of appendixes such as charts, maps, bibliographies, photos, documents, tests, or questionnaires? If not, should there be?
Article E.g.
CITATION
Rindell, A., Strandvik, T., & Wilén, K. (2014). Ethical consumers' brand avoidance. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 23(2) 114-120. doi:10.1108/JPBM-09-2013-0391
SUMMARY
In this article, Rindelle, Stradvik and Wilén (2014) examine brand avoidance among active ethical consumers, with the aim of determining to what extent ethical issues contribute to brand-avoidance. A qualitative approach was taken through interviewing fifteen people, all members of NGOs that champion ethical causes such as animal rights, environmental protection and social/human wellbeing (for example, Fair Trade). The interviews were analysed based on the interviewee’s main type of ethical concern. The authors argue that, unlike traditional brand avoidance, ethical concerns lead to rather stable and persistent rejections of brands, often rooted in historical events, which are important considerations when developing a branding strategy.
CRITIQUE
The main limitation of Rindelle et al.’s work is that the stu.
1. Annotated Bibliography (Students)
[ref: Webspace.edu.au]
It is a list of research sources that includes concise descriptions
and evaluations of each source. The annotation usually contains
a brief summary of content and a short analysis or evaluation.
I. CITATION. Use a proper format (IEEE or APA style). Cite
the article exactly as it should be in a bibliography.
II. SUMMARY. Sum up the important points in the article.
1. Why authors research is significant or Why is it an
interesting or useful problem?
2. What is the aim or objective of their research?
3. What are the key results of authors? (e.g. A>B)
3. What are their contribution to science?
III. CRITIQUE
2. What is the purpose for writing the article or doing the
research?
3. To what audience is the author writing? Is it intended for the
general public, scholars, policymakers, teachers, professionals,
practitioners, etc? Is this reflected in the author’s style of
writing or presentation? How so?
4. Does the author have a bias or make assumptions upon which
the rationale of the publication or the research rests?
5. What method of obtaining data or conducting research was
employed by the author? Is the article based on personal
opinion or experience, interviews, library research,
2. questionnaires, standardized personality tests, etc.?
6. At what conclusions does the author arrive?
7. Does the author satisfactorily justify the conclusions from the
research or experience? Why or why not?
8. How does this study compare with similar studies? Is it in
tune with or in opposition to conventional wisdom, established
scholarship professional practice, government policy, etc.? Are
there specific studies, writings, schools of thought,
philosophies, etc. with which this one agrees or disagrees, and
of which one should be aware?
9. Are there significant attachments of appendixes such as
charts, maps, bibliographies, photos, documents, tests, or
questionnaires? If not, should there be?
Article E.g.
CITATION
Rindell, A., Strandvik, T., & Wilén, K. (2014). Ethical
consumers' brand avoidance. Journal of Product and Brand
Management, 23(2) 114-120. doi:10.1108/JPBM-09-2013-0391
SUMMARY
In this article, Rindelle, Stradvik and Wilén (2014) examine
brand avoidance among active ethical consumers, with the aim
of determining to what extent ethical issues contribute to brand-
avoidance. A qualitative approach was taken through
interviewing fifteen people, all members of NGOs that
champion ethical causes such as animal rights, environmental
protection and social/human wellbeing (for example, Fair
Trade). The interviews were analysed based on the
interviewee’s main type of ethical concern. The authors argue
that, unlike traditional brand avoidance, ethical concerns lead to
rather stable and persistent rejections of brands, often rooted in
historical events, which are important considerations when
developing a branding strategy.
3. CRITIQUE
The main limitation of Rindelle et al.’s work is that the study
was restricted to fifteen people – a small sample size – and also
active members of NGOs. Therefore, more research will need to
be undertaken to see whether these trends are reflected amongst
consumers more broadly. The authors acknowledge this in their
conclusion and suggest that brand avoidance could also be
motivated by other values, for instance, relating to religion or
culture, which could warrant further study.
* Delete all the text up to here before the submission.
===============================================
=========================
ITC571 - Annotated Bibliography
2000 Words (10-12 pages)
Full Name
Student ID
Subject
ITC571 – Emerging Technology and Innovations
Assignment No
Annotated Bibliography
Due Date
04-Sep-2018
Lecturer’s Name
Malka N. Halgamuge
TASK 1 Annotated Bibliography 20%
Article 1
8. 5%
1. Select an 800-word sample of annotations from Task 1 and
submit it for testing at either
a. Turnitin turnitin.com or Small SEO Tools Plagiarism Checker
b. http://smallseotools.com/plagiarism-checker/ sites.
2. Save a copy of the originality report obtained from the
chosen site.
3. Critically evaluate and interpret the originality report, from
your context or point of view
4. as your personal Self-Evaluation Report on Originality (100-
150 words).
5. Append this short evaluation report to the saved copy of
originality report from the
6. chosen site as Task 2 completed.
7. 5. Finally submit the combined Tasks 1 and 2 via Turnitin as
required.
MATERIALS AND METHODS (optional)
What are you going to propose to solve the problem that is
existing in the current/existing solutions; (Mention the initial
solution here). You can use a diagram to clarify that with
writing text
How you are going to do your research (step by step
methodology is needed).
RESULTS (OPTIONAL)
* You include the "Results" section, ONLY, if you have
obtained your own results.
* You cannot include someone else’s figures or tables in this
section. This is only your own analysis.
* Comprehensive Figure caption is needed.
![Annotated Bibliography (Students)
[ref: Webspace.edu.au]
It is a list of research sources that includes concise descriptions
and evaluations of each source. The annotation usually contains
a brief summary of content and a short analysis or evaluation.
I. CITATION. Use a proper format (IEEE or APA style). Cite
the article exactly as it should be in a bibliography.
II. SUMMARY. Sum up the important points in the article.
1. Why authors research is significant or Why is it an
interesting or useful problem?
2. What is the aim or objective of their research?
3. What are the key results of authors? (e.g. A>B)
3. What are their contribution to science?
III. CRITIQUE
2. What is the purpose for writing the article or doing the
research?
3. To what audience is the author writing? Is it intended for the
general public, scholars, policymakers, teachers, professionals,
practitioners, etc? Is this reflected in the author’s style of
writing or presentation? How so?
4. Does the author have a bias or make assumptions upon which
the rationale of the publication or the research rests?
5. What method of obtaining data or conducting research was
employed by the author? Is the article based on personal
opinion or experience, interviews, library research,](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/annotatedbibliographystudentsrefwebspace-221224153959-577e9230/85/Annotated-Bibliography-Students-ref-Webspace-edu-au-docx-1-320.jpg)
