This assignment is a reflection APA paper on the video that is attached. The reflection paper must include the following:   The paper must address the following points:  Why do facilitated communication and other pseudo-scientific approaches still get utilized even though they have been disproved? Provide a throughout description on the background of FC (e.g., where it started, who brought it to the US, etc). How would you approach a situation where someone suggested FC as a treatment? What would you do? What harm has come from the use of this "treatment?" How was FC debunked? Although FC was publicly disproved it has reemerged. What are some other names FC has been called and why is that problematic? Please make sure that the paper is:  Easy to read, a topic introduced, organization clearly evident with proper introduction, body, conclusion.  Each paragraph has a central idea; ideas are connected and paragraphs are developed with details; paper is easy to read and “flows” naturally in an organized pattern.  Provide a thorough description of the background of FC (e.g., where it started, who brought it to the US, etc.) and answered the following questions: Why does facilitate communication and other pseudo-scientific approaches still get utilized even though they have been disproved? How would you approach a situation where someone suggested FC as a treatment? What would you do?   What harm has come from the use of this "treatment?" How was FC debunked? Although FC was publicly disproved it has reemerged. What are some other names FC has been called and why is that problematic?  L .

1. This assignment is a reflection APA paper on the video that is
attached. The reflection paper must include the following:
The paper must address the following points:
Why do facilitated communication and other pseudo-scientific
approaches still get utilized even though they have been
disproved?
Provide a throughout description on the background of FC (e.g.,
where it started, who brought it to the US, etc).
How would you approach a situation where someone suggested
FC as a treatment? What would you do?
What harm has come from the use of this "treatment?"
How was FC debunked?
Although FC was publicly disproved it has reemerged. What are
some other names FC has been called and why is that
problematic?
Please make sure that the paper is:
Easy to read, a topic introduced, organization clearly evident
with proper introduction, body, conclusion.
Each paragraph has a central idea; ideas are connected and
paragraphs are developed with details; paper is easy to read and
“flows” naturally in an organized pattern.
Provide a thorough description of the background of FC (e.g.,

2. where it started, who brought it to the US, etc.) and answered
the following questions: Why does facilitate communication and
other pseudo-scientific approaches still get utilized even though
they have been disproved? How would you approach a situation
where someone suggested FC as a treatment? What would you
do?
What harm has come from the use of this "treatment?" How
was FC debunked? Although FC was publicly disproved it has
reemerged. What are some other names FC has been called and
why is that problematic?
L