Putting together a pitch recently to assist a potential client with a PowerPoint project, and I thought I needed to make the point very clearly why I should be appointed. So I made a very simple comparison between the typical audience reaction to a presentation I had not been involved with, alongside the typical audience response to something I have breathed life into. It's all very simple, really, and I just can't understand why people have trouble following this inexorable logic.

1. The Value of Experience

2. David’s extensive experience allows him to
create a presentation style and edit content
into a communication piece that resonates
with the target market and achieves the
objectives in a powerful way

3. Employing creative and graphic elements as
part of the presentation – not to overshadow
but enhance – is one of David’s core areas of
skill.
Your audience sees dozens – even hundreds
or proposals every week. Yours must stand
out from the wallpaper.

4. The only measure David is interested in is the
effectiveness of the presentation measured
against your objectives.
And in terms of cost efficiency, David’s speed
and ability to produce quality output that does not
require extensive reworking makes him a highly
cost-effective solution.

7. Why Not Have What
She’s Having?

8. It’s a
Wrap