"Networking in a Large-Scale Distributed Agile Project" presented at the 8th International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement in September 2014, in Torino, Italy.
9. l Support teams
l Answer technical questions
l Help teams to get the right $
design and code structure
l Act as a mentor
l Review and prioritize defects
TECHNICAL AREA
RESPONSIBLE
EXPERT
Dial: 0702 100 858
10. DATA COLLECTION
l Observations from onshore $
and offshore visits
l 15 interviews with different roles
l Focus groups with each team
l Social network survey
11. SURVEY RESPONDENTS
l 6 teams
l 35 people
RESPONSE RATES
l Average = 90%
l Team >= 71%
RESULTS
l 336 dyadic ties
12. MAJOR FINDINGS
l Importance of networking when solving complex tasks
l Large size of the networks possessed by the teams
l Diversity in networks
13. !
LOCATION:
Sweden
PERFORMANCE:
High performer
TASKS:
Unfamiliar, new
COMPANY EXPERIENCE:
10+ (average)
TEAM TOGETHER:
2-3 years
14. !
LOCATION:
China
PERFORMANCE:
High performer
TASKS:
Familiar
COMPANY EXPERIENCE:
2 years (average)
TEAM TOGETHER:
2 years
15. LOCATION:
!
China
PERFORMANCE:
Challenged
TASKS:
Unfamiliar
COMPANY EXPERIENCE:
2 years (average)
TEAM TOGETHER:
<1 year
16. China
Sweden
Team C1
TAR S-C
Team C2
Team C3
Team S1
Team S2
TAR S-A
TAR S-B
TAR C-ATeam S3
17. EXPERTS EMERGE, BUT FORMALLY ASSIGNED EXPERTS ARE HELPFUL
Especially for the sites with high employee turnover rates or relatively new sites
But, experts are not one-fits-all solution either
NETWORKING REQUIRES SPACE AND TIME
Organizations shall provide meeting rooms, office layout, and facilitate CoPs
Networking shall not be perceived as a negative disturbance
Formal experts, informal experts and teams shall plan time for networking
18. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION
NETWORKING IN A LARGE-SCALE
DISTRIBUTED AGILE PROJECT
Nils Brede Moe, Darja Šmite, Aivars Šāblis
Anne-Lie Börjesson, Pia Andréasson