4. Powers Used in Investigations
Interrogation of
Witnesses
Swearing of Witnesses
Issuance of
Subpoena
Inspection of Premises
5. Commencement of Administrative
Proceedings
Administrative proceedings may be commenced
against a subordinate officer or employee by
the Secretary or head of office of equivalent
rank, or head of local government, or chiefs of
agencies, or regional directors, or upon sworn,
written complaint by any other person.
– Sec. 48 (1), Chapter 6, Subtitle A, Title I, Book V of EO 292 (Administrative
Code of 1987)
8. Under oath
In writing
In triplicate copies (n)
COMPLAINT
If there is more than 1 person complained
of, the complainant is required to submit
additional copies corresponding to the
number of persons complained of. (n)
9. Certification of non-forum shopping
Certified copy of documentary evidence
and affidavits of witnesses
Narration of relevant and material facts
Full name and address of person/s
complained of; position/s; and, office/s
Full name and address of the complainant
11. Withdrawal of Complaint
Does not result in its outright dismissal
Nor discharge the person complained of (PCO)
from any administrative liability
12. Action on the Complaint
Complaint – sufficient in form
and substance
PCO – to submit COUNTER
AFFIDAVIT/COMMENT
under
oath
Within 3 days from receipt of the
Order.
17. Role of the Person/Committee
does not sit as a judge but
only as a
fact-finder.
18. Preliminary Investigation
Inquiry or proceeding
undertaken to determine the
existence of prima facie
case to warrant the issuance
of a formal charge
19. Purpose of Preliminary Investigation
To secure the innocent against hasty, malicious and
oppressive prosecutions.
To protect him from open and public accusation of
crime, from the trouble, expenses and anxiety of a
public trial
To protect the State from useless and expensive
prosecutions.*
For the disciplining authority to determine whether
a prima facie case exists to warrant the
issuance of a formal charge.
20. At first sight
On the face of it
At first view
On first appearance absent
other information or evidence
21. Duration of PI
shall commence not later than 5 days
from receipt of the complaint
shall be terminated within 20 days
thereafter
23. Specification of charge(s)
A brief statement of material or
relevant facts with certified true copies
of the documentary evidence, if any
Sworn statements of
testimony of witnesses
Formal Charge
the
A directive to answer the charge (s)
in writing under oath in not less
than seventy-two (72) hours from
receipt thereof
An advice to indicate in the answer
whether or not he/she elects a
formal investigation
a notice that he/she may opt (n)
to be assisted by a counsel of
his/her choice.
24. Notice of Charge/s
issued in instances when the
complaint was initiated other
than the disciplining authority
(n)
25. Notice of Charge/s
charge/s against the PCO
with a statement that a
prima facie case exists
directive to answer the charge/s
in writing, under oath in not
less than 72 hours from receipt
thereof
notice that he/she may opt to be
assisted by a counsel of his/her
choice
With the following attachments
the complaint
sworn statement
other documents submitted
26. Prohibited Pleadings
requests for clarification
motions to dismiss
bills of particulars
motions to quash
motions for reconsideration
29. Purpose
To prevent the respondent from
exerting undue influence or
pressure on the witnesses
against him/her
tampering with evidence that
may be used against him/her
30. Preventive Suspension may issue if
the charge involves the following
offenses:
Dishonesty
Grave Misconduct
Oppression
Neglect in the Performance of Duty
Administrative offenses which are
punishable by dismissal from the
service on its second or third
offense.
If there are reasons to believe that
the respondent is guilty of charges
which would warrant his/her
removal from the service.
31. In lieu of preventive suspension…
reassignment
During formal hearings
36. If respondent is on authorized leave
preventive suspension shall be
deferred or interrupted until
such time that said leave has
been fully exhausted.
37. Remedy from the Order of
Preventive Suspension
Appeal to the Commission
MR is not allowed.
38. Payment of Back Salaries
During Preventive
Suspension
Declaration by the Commission that an
order of preventive suspension is null
and void on its face
39. Null and Void on its Face
The order was issued by one
who is not authorized by law.
The order was not premised on
any of the conditions under Sec
26 (A and B) of the RRACCS.
40. The order of preventive
suspension was issued without a
formal charge or notice of
charges
41. While lawful in the sense that it is based
on the enumerated grounds, the
duration of the imposed preventive
suspension has exceeded the
prescribed periods.
42. If the official or
concerned
is
exonerated
employee
fully
of the charge/s
or when the penalty imposed in
the principal case is reprimand
(n), he or she shall be paid such
back salaries.
43. Full Exoneration
A finding of
for the
offense/s charged.
Downgrading of the charge to a lesser
offense shall
not be construed as “full
exoneration.”
45. In case the penalty is suspension or
removal, the respondent shall be
considered as having been under
PREVENTIVE SUSPENSION during
the pendency of the appeal in the event
he wins the appeal
48. Effect of Affirmation of Conviction
The period of suspension becomes
part of the final penalty of
suspension or dismissal.
49. Formal
when the merits of the case
cannot be decided judiciously
without conducting such
investigation
when the respondent elects to have one
50. Period of Investigation
Not earlier than 5 days nor
later than 10 days from the
date of receipt of Answer
Shall be finished within 30 days from the filing
of the charges
Unless the period is extended by the
disciplining authority in meritorious cases
51. Submission of Position
Paper/Memorandum
at any stage of the proceedings
based on the mutual consent of the parties
submit the case for resolution
without any need for further
hearings (n)
53. Matters that will be considered and agreed
upon by the parties during the PHC
Stipulation of facts
Simplification of issues
Limiting the number of witnesses, and their names
Dates of subsequent hearings
Identification and marking of evidence of the parties
Such other matters as may aid in the prompt
and just resolution of the case.
Waiver of objections to admissibility of evidence
60. Formal Investigation Report
Shall be submitted to the
disciplining authority within
15 days after the conclusion
of the formal investigation.
61. Contents of Report
Narration of the material facts
established during the
investigation
Findings and evidence
supporting said findings
Recommendations
65. Settlement in Administrative Cases
Light Offenses
Act is purely personal on the part of the
private complainant and person
complained of
There is no apparent injury committed
to the government.
66. Offenses which may be the subject
of settlement and/or compromise
Borrowing money by superior officers
from subordinates
Willful failure to pay just debts
67. Simple Misconduct resulting from
misunderstanding/fight between the
respondent and complainant provided the
act is not committed within office premises
Discourtesy in the course of official duties
Other analogous circumstances/cases
68. Aide Memoire
Administrative investigations shall
be conducted without necessarily
adhering strictly to the technical
rules of procedure and evidence
applicable to judicial proceedings.
Any authority in an organization will be useless unless this authority is supported by a disciplining power.Without the power to discipline, the power of control would be an empty power.The power to discipline includes the power to investigate.Joson vs. Torres, May 20, 1998, 290 SCRA 279
Nature of the Administrative ProcessIs the administrative investigation process adversary in nature?NOT ADVERSARIALNo private interests are involved in administrative disciplinary case as the offense is committed against the governmentParedes vs. CSC, Dec. 4, 1990, 192 SCRA 84
Among the investigatory powers are:Issuance of subpoenasSwearing of witnessesInterrogation of witnessesCall for the production of books, paper, and recordsRequire that books, papers, records be made available for inspectionInspection of premisesRequire written answers to questionnairesRequire periodic or special reportsRequire filing of statements
Except when initiated by the disciplinary authority, no complaint against a civil service official or employee shall be given due course unless the same is in writing and subscribed and sworn to by the complainant. Sec. 47 (c), Book V, EO 292
Without the motu propio intervention of the disciplining authority, the charge or complaint filed by other persons are required to be under oath.REASONTo protect government employees against malicious complaints filed only for the purpose of harassing them.Jacob vs. Director of Lands, June 21, 1966, 17 SCRA 415Maloga vs. Gella, Nov. 29, 1965The requirement of oath does not apply to proceedings commenced by direct charge of the department or agency head.The head of an agency is not required to swear to an administrative charge because the position of responsibility, which he occupies, sufficiently warrants that his charges are worth investigating. And he acts in the performance of a function which, upon assuming office, he already swore to discharge faithfully.Bueno vs. Cordoba, April 27, 1967, 19 SCRA 899Rationale for the RuleHeads of agencies enjoy the presumption of regularity in the performance of their official duty.The head of an office has the inherent right and the duty to discipline his subordinates. When he acts in the performance of that duty he cannot be placed on the same level as a private individual who complains against an act or conduct of a public servant.It could not have been the intention of the law to require him to sign under oath an official letter to a subordinate employee requiring that latter to show cause why disciplinary action should not be taken against him for an alleged misconduct or irregularity.Such a requirement would be superfluous and uncalled for inasmuch as all official acts of an officer of the government are understood to have been performed under his oath of office.Diaz vs. Arca, October 29, 1965, 15 SCRA 183
EXCEPT In cases initiated by the proper disciplining authority
Effect of Absence of Any of the RequirementsMay cause (n) the DISMISSAL of the complaint without prejudice to its refiling upon compliance with the requirements.
General RuleNo anonymous complaint shall be entertained Exceptionunless there is obvious truth or merit to the allegations therein or supported by documentary or direct evidence
Complaint is Given Due CourseWhen there is obvious truth or merit to the allegations in the complaint.Where there is documentary evidence that would tend to prove the guilt of the PCO.ReasonIn administrative cases, the complainant assumes the role of a witness, hence, even if he withdraws, the complaint may still prosper.Provided that there are other witnesses or documents available to support the charges against the PCO.
It shall be conducted by thedisciplining authority concerned or his authorized representative.Sec. 48 (7), Book V, EO 292Investigation and adjudication of administrative complaints against appointive local officials and employees as well as their suspension and removal shall be in accordance with the civil service law and rules and other pertinent laws. The results of such administrative investigations shall be reported to the CSC.Sec. 84, Title 3, RA 7160 (The Local Government Code of 1991)
In any local government unit, administrative investigation may be conducted by a person or a committee duly authorized by the local chief executive. Said person or committee shall conduct hearings on the cases brought against appointive local officials and employees and submit their findings and recommendations to the LCE concerned within 15 days from the conclusion of the hearings. The administrative cases herein mentioned shall be decided within 90 days from the time the respondent is formally notified of the charges.Sec. 86, Title 3, RA 7160The disciplining authority cannot at all times and personally attend to disciplinary investigations.Practical necessity
The investigating officer or investigating committee does not sit as a judge but only as a fact-finder.He does not sit in judgment upon the respondent but merely determines the facts to ascertain if he is still fit to remain in public service.The investigator must have a valid appointment or designation and the investigating committee must be validly created.Without a valid appointment, designation or creation, the investigator/s cannot assume the investigatory powers such as the power to issue subpoena or subpoena duces tecum, and the power to administer oaths to witnesses.
involves a fact-finding investigation or an ex parte examination of records and documents submitted by the complainant and the POCIncludes documents readily available from other government offices
*Albay Accredited Constructors Association, Inc. vs. Desierto, 480 SCRA 520. (criminal case)
Prima Facie Case - A case established by evidence that is sufficient to raise a presumption of fact or establish the fact in question unless rebutted.Prima Facie Evidence-Evidence good and sufficient on its face. Such evidence as, in the judgment of the law, is sufficient to establish a given fact, or the group or chain of facts constituting the party's claim or defense, and which if not rebutted or contradicted, will remain sufficient. H. Black, et al., Black's Law Dictionary 1190 (6th ed.,1990). Wa-Acon vs. People, G.R. No. 164575, December 6, 2006 Evidence which, if unexplained or uncontradicted, is sufficient to sustain a judgment in favor of the issue it supports, but which may be contradicted by other evidence
the investigating officer shall submit the Investigation Report with recommendation and the complete records of the case to the disciplining authority.
If filed- shall be considered as an answer and shall be evaluated as such.
May contain not only the ultimate facts but also other relevant facts.not being covered by technical rules, the Answer may include the evidence, arguments and other defenses of the respondent.Failure to submit an Answer to a formal charge sent by registered mail is a waiver of the right to be heard.Mendoza vs. CSC, July 5, 1994, 233 SCRA 657
A measure of precaution so that the official or employee charged may be removed from the scene of his/her alleged misfeasance/malfeasance/nonfeasance while the same is being investigated.
1. upon petition of the complainant 2. motu propioIt is immaterial that no evidence has been adduced to prove that respondent may influence possible witnesses or may tamper with the public records. It is sufficient that there exists such possibility.Castillo-Co vs. Barbers, June 16, 1998, 290 SCRA 717May be imposed after the formal charge against the respondent is filed and even before an answer is submitted, as the formal charge is a sufficient determinant as to whether grounds for the imposition of preventive suspension exists or not.The order of preventive suspension may be integrated in the formal charge.
In lieu of preventive suspension, for the same purpose, the proper disciplining authority or head of office, may reassign respondent to other unit of the agency during the formal hearings.Rule 7, Sec. 25 C, RRACCS
Preventive Suspension Pending Appeal if the penalty imposed by the disciplining authority is suspension or dismissal and, after review, the respondent is exonerated.
A measure intended to enable the disciplining authority to investigate charges against respondent by preventing the latter from intimidating or in any way influencing witnesses against him
within 15 days from receipt thereofpending appeal, the same shall be executory
Immediate reinstatement and payment of back salaries
A- Charges that warrant imposition of preventive suspensionB-objectives of preventive suspension
While lawful in the sense that it is based on the enumerated grounds, the duration of the imposed preventive suspension has exceeded the prescribed periods.The payment of back salaries shall correspond to the excess period only.A declaration of invalidity of a preventive suspension order not based on any of the reasons cited shall result in the reinstatement of the official or employee concerned.The payment of back salaries shall await the final outcome of the principal case
Otherwise, no back salaries shall be awarded.
A finding upholding the legality of a preventive suspension order shall neither give rise toPayment of back salaries corresponding to the period of preventive suspensionEven if the respondent official/employee be eventually found innocent of the charge/s proffered against him/her.
The Secretaries and heads of agencies and instrumentalities, provinces, cities and municipalities shall have jurisdiction to investigate and decide matters involving disciplinary action against officers and employees under their jurisdiction.Disciplinary jurisdiction of heads of agencies – Section 47, Book V, Title I, Subtitle A, EO 292 (Administrative Code of 1987Their decisions shall be final in case the penalty imposed is suspension for not more than 30 days or fine in an amount not exceeding 30 days salary.In case the decision rendered by a bureau or office head is appealable to the Commission, the same may be initially appealed to the department and finally to the Commission and pending appeal, the same shall be EXECUTORY except when the penalty is removal, in which case the same shall be executory only after confirmation by the Secretary concerned.
Although it is in effect subsequently considered illegal if respondent is exonerated and the administrative decision finding him guilty is reversed.
The period within which a public officer or employee charged is placed under preventive suspension shall not be considered part of the actual penalty of suspension imposed upon the employee found guilty.Sec 25, Rule XIV, Omnibus Rules Implementing Book V of EO 292
Investigation shall be finished within 30 days from the issuance of the formal charge unless the period is extended by the disciplining authority in meritorious cases.The Commission may entrust the formal investigation to lawyers of other agencies pursuant to Sec. 117 of the RRACCS.
Waiver of the Right to a Formal HearingRight to a formal hearing may be waived.Article 6, Civil CodeMay be express or impliedAgreeing to submit the case for decision on the basis of affidavits constitutes a waiver of the right to a formal investigation.Huertas vs. Gonzales
Ex Parte ProceedingsWhen respondent waives his right to a formal hearing, decision may forthwith be rendered on the pleadings and other evidence on hand provided that the same are sufficiently substantial to support a decision or conclusion.Where a party was properly notified of the scheduled hearing and the said party failed to attend the said hearing inspite of the notice, the hearing may proceed ex parte even though the said party filed a motion for postponement, as it did not necessarily mean that his motion was granted.If the disciplinary investigation was concluded during that ex parte hearing, the case may be deemed submitted for decision. Padilla vs. Sto. Tomas, March 31, 1995, 243 SCRA 155
failure of the respondent to attend the pre-hearing conference constitutes a waiver to participate in the pre-hearing conferencebut may still participate in the formal investigation upon appropriate motion.
failure of the respondent to attend the pre-hearing conference constitutes a waiver to participate in the pre-hearing conferencebut may still participate in the formal investigation upon appropriate motion.
unless in the interest of justice, the hearing officer may allow a deviation from the same
Records of the proceedings may be taken in shorthand or stenotype or any other means of recordingBefore taking the testimony of a witness, the hearing officer shall place him/her under oath and take his/her NAME, ADDRESS, CIVIL STATUS, AGE and COMPLETE NAME AND ADDRESS OF EMPLOYMENT.A sworn statement of the witness properly identified and affirmed shall constitute direct testimony, copy furnished the other party.
Those that cannot be ruled upon by the hearing officer shall be noted with the information that the same shall be included in the memorandum of the concerned party to be ruled upon by the proper disciplining authority
If respondent fails or refuses to appear orIs not represented by counsel despite due noticeThe investigation shall proceed deemed to have waived right to present evidence during the hearing
Complete records of the case shall be attached
A valid decision must contain a finding of facts after hearing and investigation upon which the order is based; and for lack of such a finding of facts, the order, decision or conclusion is void.Wichita Railroad & Light Co. vs. Public Utility Commission, 260 U.S. 48
AngTibay vs. CIR69 Phil 635
If these elements are present, settlement of offenses MAY be considered. Provided that settlement can no longer be applied for the second offense of the same act committed by the person complained of.