The Incarnation Of God By John Clark And Marcus Johnson Essay

The Incarnation Of God By John Clark And Marcus Johnson Essay
Book Review– The Incarnation of God God become man, one of the profound mysteries of the
Gospel and the Christian faith, is evidenced and affirmed throughout Scripture, yet it all too often is
neglected in modern Christian thought and practice. In the work, The Incarnation of God, John
Clark and Marcus Johnson do just the opposite. They bring the truth from scripture to robustly
discuss a theology of the incarnation of God. Throughout their discussion, it becomes evident that
the book strives to address the centrality of the incarnation, to the whole of the Christian faith,
finding it's support both in scripture and also the historic understandings of the catholic Church. This
discussion begins by placing its roots in their proper foundation, historic Christian orthodoxy. The
reality of the incarnation informs and is informed by all of the core doctrines of the Christian faith.
Without an orthodox understanding of any of these aspects, one cannot see the robust, beautiful and
awe inspiring truth of the Gospel. Thus, the question surfaces, why have we in the modern church
all but completely abandoned the discussion and teaching of the doctrine of the incarnation? The
book delves into each of these areas of orthodoxy mentioned thus far, pulling out the intricacies that
are brought to fullness in light of the incarnation of Jesus Christ. Beginning with the optic of
knowing God, Clark and Johnson affirm that it is a beautiful reality that we are given the chance to
know
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Constantine The Great : The Reign Of Constantine The Great
The reign of Constantine the Great marks the transition of the Christian religion from under
persecution by the secular government to union with the same, beginning the state–church system
(Schaff, pg., 4). However, following Jesus's death, resurrection, and ascension, many questions arose
about Christ, his nature, and in answer to those, different hypocritical positions arose. In the fourth
and fifth centuries, the early Church Fathers gathered to discuss and agree to a common, Biblical
view of Christ in response to some erroneous views. These were the Councils of Nicaea (325 A.D.),
Constantinople (381 A.D.), and Chalcedon (451 A.D.). 2. The Outcome The first Ecumenical
Council, (meaning that it involved and bound all Church traditions), was the Council of Nicaea. This
council met as a response to Arianism (named after Arius of Alexandria) which denied that Jesus the
Son is eternal, but rather made by God and therefore, inferior to God. He proposed, "before [the
Son] was begotten or created or defined or established, he was not for he was not unbegotten"
(Bingham, pg., 46) as well as "the Son has a beginning, but God is without beginning" (Bingham,
pg., 46). Constantine, the Emperor of both the East and the West felt compelled to intervene, thus
calling the Council of Nicene in June of 325. This resulted in the Creed of Nicea, which
"condemned Arianism resulting in an anti–Arian creed" (Lane, pg., 29). The Nicea Creed concluded,
"Jesus shared the Father' divine

Heresies And Heretics Of The Middle Ages
Heresies and Heretics Notes
Any group or individual who differs from another group can technically be called heretical. In Acts
24:14, Christians are called heretics by the Jews. The "heretics" of the Middle Ages were only
heretical in that they disagreed with the Catholic Church, not because they held unbiblical doctrines.
The Spanish Inquisition executed over 14,000 people, many of them for simply possessing a Bible.
Thus, biblically speaking, it was the established church itself that was heretical during the Middle
Ages. divisive or maintained in defiance of clear biblical teaching, it becomes heretical.
Second Peter 2:1 says, "There will be false teachers among you, who will secretly bring in
destructive heresies, even denying the Master who bought them, bringing upon themselves swift
destruction." From this verse, we see that heresy is anything that denies the teaching of Jesus. ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
These verses touch on both aspects of what constitutes heresy in the church: denying the doctrines
God has given, and dividing the body He has created. Both of these are dangerous, destructive
actions that are soundly rebuked by Scripture. See also 1 John 4:1–6; 1 Timothy 1:3–6; 2 Timothy
1:13–14; and Jude 1.
How does the Bible deal with heresy? Titus 3:10 says, "A man that is an heretic after the first and
second admonition reject" (KJV). ExcommunicationThe truth of Christ will unify believers (John
17:22–23), but heresy, by its very nature, cannot peacefully co–exist with the

Personal Statement : God And Jesus Christ
As I've been pondering my becoming project, I've come to relies that I've grown in ways that I never
thought I needed to. At the beginning I was having a very hard time trying to figure out what Christ
like attribute that I need to work on most. As I prayed and ponder and look at the all the Christ like
attributes it stood out to was believing. I started to ask myself why, why do I need to need to believe
more in Heavenly Father and Jesus Christ. Well going thru this semester I have found out why.
There is so many reason why we need to straighten a Christ like attribute.
Here are some of the thing that I learned and needed to be reminded of so that I can come closer to
Heavenly Father and Jesus Christ. The biggest thing that I've learned is that I need to trust. I know
that you are asking what does trust has to do with believing, it has everything to do with it. If we
can't trust in something then how do we believe in the truth of the world. I've come to learn that if I
don't believe in my savior then there would be no reason for any of use to live or have come to earth
and gain knowledge. What made me come to this realization in trust and believing go hand and
hand. Is when I went to the temple to get some answer to some question that I've been pondering. I
came to me that I needed to trust in the lord and that my believing would come. I have found this to
be so true.
As I have read the scriptures I've come across that believe in many verses. This made

The Importance Of The Easter Vigil
At the Easter Vigil, "a blazing fire is prepared... outside the church... on this most sacred night, in
which... [the Catholic Church celebrates the] Lord Jesus Christ['s passing]... over from death to life."
The fire is then blessed by the priest. After igniting and blessing the Easter fire, "one of the
[attending] ministers brings the paschal candle to the priest, who cuts a cross into the candle... Then
he makes the Greek letter Alpha above the cross, the letter Omega below, and the four numerals of
the current year between the arms of the cross." After marking the Christ candle with all the symbols
just mentioned, "the priest may insert five grains of incense into the Easter candle in the form of a
cross." These two ritual actions (i.e. the blessing of the fire and the preparation of the Paschal
candle) are essential moments in the Easter Vigil liturgy. This paper will explore why these two
ceremonial actions are significant to the Catholic Church. To fully appreciate why these two actions
are so meaningful, it is necessary to examine four questions. First, what is the historical and
symbolic background of these two actions? Second, how are these two procedures initiatory? Third,
what do they teach us about the initiatory process? Fourth, what do these two ritualistic actions
suggest for parish life?
The steps of starting and blessing the Easter fire have a rich historical background within the
Catholic Church. According to the rubrics of The Roman Missal, the "fire should be

The Concept Of Jesus Being Fully Man
Introduction
The concept of Jesus being fully man but also fully God at the same time has been debated amongst
scholars, both Christians and non–Christians alike for centuries. The doctrine and study surrounding
the person of Jesus is known as Christology, and after extensive and often hostile debates the
Church gave a concluding definition of its Christology in 451 CE at the Council of Chalcedon. It
was stated that they affirmed the belief in Jesus Christ as 'one Person in two natures, which are
united without confusion.' The early church was adamant that the Incarnation was one of the most
important truths of the Christian faith.
Maurice Wiles, an Oxford patristic scholar summarised the Chalcedons's aims as follows:
'On the other hand was the conviction that a saviour must be fully divine; on the other hand was the
conviction that what is not assumed is not healed. Or, to put the matter in other words, the source of
salvation must be God; the locus of salvation must be humanity. It is quite clear that these two
principles often pulled in opposite directions. The Council of Chalcedon was the church's attempt to
resolve, or perhaps rather to agree to live with, that tension.' This essay will examine and critically
analyse this stance alongside answering the question of would it matter if Jesus were not fully God
and fully human? Five specific points will be looked at; Jesus is God, Jesus is man, Jesus is a sinless
man, Jesus will be fully God and man forever, and

Jesus Christ ( Christology )
Jesus Christ (Christology)
I believe Jesus is fully God and fully man (Phil 2:6–11), one person with two natures, conceived by
the Holy Spirit and born of the virgin Mary (Luke 1:34–38), accredited by God through miracles,
wonders and signs which God did through Him, died on the cross to justify all sinners who believe
in Him from God's wrath (1 Pet 3:18; Rom 5:9), arose from the dead (Acts 2:23–24) and is now at
the right hand of God the Father (Heb 8:1), and will come again to establish His kingdom (Matt
26:64).
The conception by the Holy Spirit instead of by the line of descent from Adam, and the virgin birth
by Mary together show that the unity of fully divine and fully human in one person of Jesus and the
source of salvation from the Holy God instead of from human including Mary (Gen. 3:15; Luke
1:35)
Jesus is one person (hypostatic union and not Nestorianism for two persons) with two distinct wills
(centers of consciousness) belong to the two preserved natures (Mark 13:32; John 2:25, 16:30,
21:17, not Apollinarianism for one divine nature nor Eutychianism for one mixed new nature)
The Lord Jesus preexists with God, was God and is God (John 1:1). He, being in very nature God,
did not consider equality with God but made himself a man (Phil 2:6–8) without losing any of His
divine attributes (Col 1:19, 2:9). He should be worshiped in the same sense and to the same degree
as the Father by every creature (Rev. 5:13) because He is fully God and in Him all the fullness of

The Corrupted Christ Figure In The Poisonwood Bible
The Corrupted Christ Figure
A Christ figure can share attributes with Jesus and be the antagonist of the story. In Thomas C.
Foster's novel How to Read Literature like a Professor, he analyzes what a Christ figure looks like in
literature. He argues that a character who shares personality traits and or physical characteristics
with Christ is a representation and reflection of Jesus. Similarly, in Barbara Kingsolver's novel The
Poisonwood Bible, her character Nathan Price believes he is synonymous to Christ while in reality,
he is far from perfect. She uses irony to exploit the idea of the Christ figure. The use of irony as seen
in Kingsolver's novel, up–ends Foster's claims as to what makes a Christ figure by creating a
character who assumes he is Christ yet does not reflect Christ's attributes.
A Christ figure represents the attributes of Christ in the way they live. Foster expands on this idea by
arguing a list of characteristics regarding Jesus. As readers, he claims, "while we may not be all that
versed in types and archetypes from the Bible, we generally recognize, whatever our religious
affiliation, some of the features that make Christ who he is" (Foster 125). If Christ's attributes reflect
themselves in a character, readers can use their knowledge to assume the character is a Christ figure.
Likewise, Kingsolver uses Nathan Price as an examples of a Christ figure. Nathan comes to the
Congo to redeem an unworthy people, has disciples (his family), and wanders the

Arian Controversy Analysis
In the 4th and 5th centuries, the early church was going through change. After a period of
persecution against Christians, the Edict of Milan established a policy for the toleration of
Christianity under Constantine. Constantine was the first Roman emperor to embrace Christianity
and he himself became a Christian. The Ecumenical Councils were encouraged by Constantine. The
gatherings included church leaders and others who met to affirm the teachings of the church and to
tackle heresy. The topic of controversy was over the relationship between the Father, the Son and the
Holy Spirit.
The Arian controversy caused Constantine to call for the Council of Nicaea, which was the first of
the Ecumenical Councils. Arias denied the deity of Jesus. He believed that Jesus was subordinate to
God the Father and that the Holy Spirit was subordinate to Jesus. Arias believed that the Father was
God, but Jesus and the Holy Spirit were not. Instead, he believed that Jesus was a creature who had
a beginning, while God was eternal and had no beginning. He did not believe that Jesus was "of the
same substance [homoousios]" of the Father. Athanasius stood up at the Council of Nicaea and
opposed the beliefs of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
I believe that the Nicene Creed is supported by Scripture. John 1:14 says, "The Word [Logos]
became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the one and
only Son, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth." And 1 John 5:7–8 says, "For there are
three that testify: the Spirit, the water and the blood; and the three are in agreement." I find it
encouraging that leaders of the 4th and 5th century church helped define and defended the Trinity
doctrine from heresy. It is important that contemporary Christians learn about the Nicene Creed
because it is part of the history that brought us [the invisible church] to where we are,

The Lord of the Flies by William Golding
Simon is one of the major characters in the "Lord of the Flies" novel. Simon's character seems to
live by what is right as to the rest of the boys on the island. There are many reasons and examples in
the Lord of the Flies that have to do with Simon being compared to Jesus Christ.
One reason Simon is called the Christ figure in Lord of the Flies is that he always seems to commit
to many selfless acts just like the Christ did. Simon, he chooses to stay and help Ralph build huts
then to go play with the other boys. Ralph gave Simon a compliment by saying "Simon. He Helps.
All the rest rushed off. He's done as much as I have". The author also shows that Simon is caring
when "Simon pulled off the choicest from the endless, outstretched hands". Jesus Christ was very
well known to have been very caring and kind with children. Simon's carness and unselfishness
showed that Simon was being a Christ figure.
Another reason Simon is a Christ like figure is that he has mystical qualities like Christ. A lot of
things that Simon does are either very unusual or supernatural. Simon tells Ralph, "I just think you'll
get back alright," even though he believes that he, himself might not get off the island alive. Simon
predicts his own death; just like Jesus. Also after Jesus dies, his body magically disappears. Simon
was killed during the so called, "ritual dance" so that all the other boys will live. All the boys on the
island killed Simon, but many of them were told that it wasn't really

Argument Of Athanasius And Arius At The Council Of Nicaea
Critically evaluate the arguments of Athanasius and Arius at the Council of Nicaea The Patristic Era
saw various controversies arising over the nature of Jesus Christ, which consequently lead to the
establishment of the creed as an attempt to reject the heretical views held by proponents. An
example of a heretical advocate is Arius, who suggested Christ was inferior to God, but still above
other creatures (McGrath, 2001, p.358). However, early orthodox theologians disputed this idea due
to the soteriological complications that accompanied it (Young, 2010, p.55). The central advocator
of this dispute was Athanasius, who questioned how Arius' belief allowed for salvation through
Jesus Christ, which is a key orthodox belief identified within the Bible. Accordingly, this essay will
critically evaluate the heretical opinion of Arius and determine how this Arian understanding was
discarded by Athanasius and the Nicene Creed. It is important to note that the Arian thought that will
be assessed is primarily presented to us by Athanasius, which will emphasise the conflicting
orthodoxy/heretical opinion that was held. In addition to this, the essay will determine how the
establishment of the creed at the Council of Nicaea, which was greatly influenced by Athanasius
(McGrath 2001, p,12), was a failed attempt to expel all aspects of Arian heresy but a success in
uniting Christians. Firstly, the definition of heresy will be explained as to not discredit Arius'
Chrisitian belief: Heresy is the acceptance of basic Christian principle but interpreting it in terms
that are not consistent with orthodoxy (McGrath, 2001, p.153). Arius, as a Christian, accepted the
supreme authority of an eternal God but he declared God alone is "anarchos" and Jesus has an arche
(Williams, 2001, p.97); the suggestion of Jesus' created existence makes him a distinctly separate
nature from God. This a direct rejection of the Council of Nicaea's declaration of Jesus having the
same essence of God; therefore, this Arian belief is a heresy through refusal not misinterpretation.
This heretical view is further fought against through Athanasius' extensive focus on Jesus' death and
the implications that this had on humanity as told by the Bible

Essay on Kingdom and Culture
Kingdoms and Cultures
Toni Romero
Grand Canyon University
Christian Worldview and Contextualization
HTH 655
Professor Robert Prescott–Ezickson
October 09, 2013
Kingdoms and Cultures
Oscillatory has exercised vast inspiration by what method we abstract the link among Christianity
and philosophy. The situation has converted several societies' circumstances to vision their culture
of resistance to foremost characteristics of the common philosophies as rather of which to be
humiliated, as well as rather that desires to remain rejected with the intention to convert traditionally
liable. Niebuhr debates that Yoder's forceful analysis of his book has not been offered the extensive
revelation it justifies, particularly his reason that ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Several do it over opposition, Christ against Culture. Additional do it by regular evangelizing,
conversion for example. Culture is immovable and Christ is the burdens of Jesus. Niebuhr precedes
a multicultural method with his five types of Christian ethics (Yoder, 1996). According to Atkinson,
(1995), the fundamental situation is that Christ is against culture. Culture is viewed as being
intimidating to Christianity in belief as well as tradition. Regardless of the society in which
Christians find themselves, they are called to oppose the customs and accomplishments of culture.
Assurance to Christ requires a decision (Yoder, 1996).
Christ against culture known as the "New law" on this interpretation the Lordship of Christ does not
define that untruth is the uppermost of abundant powers, on the other hand, that He is the solitary
power surrounding the Christians (GCU, lecture). It therefore, awards Christ and culture as a major
one or both superior; if we take up our cross and follow Christ, we need to discard any faithfulness
to culture. For example, the book of (1 John 2:15) declares, "Do not love the world or anything in
the world; if anyone loves the world, the love of the father is not in him" (NIV, 1995).
Christ of culture known as the "Natural Law "acknowledges an ultimate agreement amongst Christ
and culture (GCU, lecture). Christ Himself is beheld as a highest conqueror of culture. His life and
instructions

The Influence Of Christology On The Patristic Church
Christology was a central debate in the patristic church. The discussion about Jesus Christ was
prevalent throughout the church for centuries and resulted in church councils that produced creeds
for the whole church to stand upon as a foundation for Christological orthodoxy. Even with these
orthodox creeds, the debate did not end there. The contemporary church, just like the patristic
church, has found itself fighting to hold to an orthodox Christology.
Just as it was in the patristic church the contemporary debate proceeds from a desire to be true to the
teaching of the faith handed down from the apostles. The issue for the contemporary Church is not
so different from the patristic church. There is a breakdown of functional oneness, which ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This emphasis on the humanity of Jesus, the denial of his divinity, and the strict law–based lifestyle
of the Spirit Adoptionists gave space for many Jewish believers to join them.
The Christian Church in Italy
The Christian Church in Italy, also known as CCI, identify as Christian. They profess Jesus Christ as
redeemer and savior in their statement of faith. They are strict monotheists while still professing
Jesus as the Son of God, the Christ, prophet, and savior of all mankind. They do not deny the virgin
birth and claim that they believe in Christ's atoning work of salvation upon the cross. These are
orthodox beliefs and diversions from Spirit Adoptionist teachings.
CCI is clear about their belief in the full humanity of Jesus but when it comes to his divinity they are
either silent or they state that they are only open to a dialogue about it. "As we have said, all the
scripture presents a Christ man. Our goal however is not limited to this, because we have a duty to
investigate the other verses that, over the years, were interpreted in favor of the pre–existence of
Christ, his incarnation, his divinity." When CCI says that Jesus was the Son of God they do not
mean that he was divine. One cannot hold the orthodox Christian understanding of what is meant by
Son of God if you are only open to a conversation about his divinity.
They continue to diverge from orthodoxy when speaking about

Reaffirming Jesus : How Convictions Challenged By...
Daniel Barabino
Jesus through the Centuries
Dr. Millicent Feske
5 April 2017
Reaffirming Jesus:
How Convictions Challenged by Conflicting Evidence Yield Stronger Beliefs Jesus has been
presented to me in a consistent way from my youth beginning in kindergarten through my high
school experience. My initial understanding of Jesus is that he is a fully human, fully divine savior
that serves as a teacher for his historical peers through contemporary times. The conceptions and
understanding I have of Jesus had not been contested, challenged or questioned until I came to St.
Joseph's. While my original ideas of Jesus have largely remained unchanged throughout the course,
they have been significantly strengthened through exploring and ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
This division is knowledge is largely attributed to the scientific revolution. For example, in early
India, God was said to be present where priests were left silent. This ancient understanding of
divinity was rooted solely in mythos. As science developed and rose to a paramount discipline with
the likes of Copernicus and Newton, religion was tested against a logos way of thinking. Because of
this, people demanded that science yield proof of biblical accuracies and so were born atheism and
fundamentalism. People were reading the Bible far too literally (which was not nearly as pervasive a
thought prior to the scientific revolution), and concurrently the certainty that began being expected
of the Bible was too demanding. Interpreters of the Bible began holding up something to the laws of
logos, that is intrinsically grounded in mythos Theres a misconception that a scientist cannot be
involved in organized religion, that these two systems are diametrically opposed. Scientists are only
"supposed" to be believe in the observable and quantifiable things that we can physically have proof
of, and religion is seen as fundamentally against everything being a scientist is about. This thinking
really helped me to better understand Jesus, and perhaps more generally God an organized religion. I
am a skeptical and rational person (perhaps because my father is scientist), but that does not
preclude me from believing or participating in religion. I do

What Is Feminist Christianity
Christianity has been seen as a church that professes the doctrine of the Blessed Trinity; God the
Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit. Just with this introduction, feminist individuals would
have already have some opposition with the terms used and attributed to God. In this paper I will
explore on several aspects that the feminist movement provides to Christianity. First, I will illustrate
on what is feminist Christology. Then I will present passages from Sacred Scripture, both in Old and
New Testament. Then I will go further on and reflect on the Ecclesial aspect and the service god has
provided to creation. Last, I will conclude by acknowledging all aspects exposed, yet analyzing the
fact that God would be limited if he had a ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For centuries, women have brought their gifts, talents and service to church. Their presence and
service goes further than getting things done. For instance, Elizabeth Hernandez who serves at my
home parish. She is a leader of the Hispanic Ministries and she oversees all liturgical ministries.
Elizabeth works together with Antonio, her husband, but her female qualities make the difference in
her performance with the people. Being the bridge between the pastor and all of the lay ministers,
she is able to lead with complete authority, yet in such a gentle way. Most importantly, she is not a
micromanager, but a woman of faith, which has made it easy for all ministries to relate to. Other
examples of women in leadership at the Archdiocese of Los Angeles include; parish life directors,
pastoral associates, school principals and directors of religious education. At the Archdiocesan
Catholic Center, Sr. Mary Elizabeth Galt, B.V.M. has held the high–ranking office of Chancellor.
Since 2003, she has worked together with the archbishop and the vicar general, for the well being of
the administrative offices of the Archdiocesan Catholic Center. Other female that are in high ranking
positions in the United States include Catholic Charities, Catholic

On the Incarnation
Religion is a time old method used universally to express beliefs and help us understand some
mysteries of life before time, in the present, and the future life, or afterlife. Although, it is not that
simple to comprehend. Over time, it has morphed and evolved into ideas and traditions completely
different from what was previously known and taught. One of the biggest changes of all time in
religious history was brought about when Jesus Christ, Son of God, became flesh here on Earth. Not
only did this bring change, but it also caused many conflicts and doubts. In the book On The
Incarnation Saint Athanasius resolves some of these issues and heresies by providing counter
arguments to prove Jesus' full humanity and divinity. He discusses ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
He who healed others could not just fall sick (Pohle 2/17). "Christ on the cross was God, and that all
creation was His slave and was bearing witness by it's fear to the presence of it's Master"
(Athanasius 20).
For the argument of His full divinity Athanasius says, "What man that ever was, for instance,
formed a body for himself from a virgin only? Or what man ever held so many diseases as the
common Lord of all? Who restored that which was lacking in man's nature or made one blind from
birth to see?" (Athanasius 49) So you see, what human could do any of that? The people of that
time's ancient gods could not even come close to miracles of that magnitude.
"In old times the whole world and every place in it was led astray by the worship of idols, and men
thought the idols were the only gods that were. But now all over the world men are forsaking fear of
idols and taking refuge with Christ..." (Athanasias 46). Jesus brought about nullification of the
traditions of old times such as worship of idols, as Athanasius spoke about, use of oracles, ancient
gods and heroes, demons, magic, and wisdom of greeks. Not all were convinced of our great and
powerful God though and claimed that theirs were superior. They couldn't win the argument. They
say their gods can make people drunk, ours can teach temperance. Theirs can cause sickness, ours
can heal diseases. Demons cast in by their gods were cast out by ours. Death caused by other gods
was no match for how God defeated death.

Short Essay 2
Theo 201 B27 201220
Short Essay # 2 Short Essay on Christology
What is the biblical basis for Jesus' humanity?
Jesus' humanity was and is far from being comparable to ours as man created from the ground than
to Him coming to form through Spirit. On the other hand being born from a sinless virtue.
What is the biblical basis for deity?
Several basis of deity is that demonstration would show of God–like attributes, teachings being
consistent and correspond to the wisdom of God. As Jesus' deity he showed all the above that I had
mentioned as well as claiming to be God. As well as it says in the Bible John 1:1, "the Word was
God"
Explain how Jesus can be both God and Man at the same time (Hypostatic Union).
Jesus can be both God ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
That to Him is saying that you are the son of the father of lies.
What are the common objections to the traditional understanding of Christology, and how do you
respond to them?
Some objections were it being a philosophical idea than it being historical revelation. Another was
that there is no divine production of the world or there being three different people but as a union.
There's another one saying that Jesus didn't fully become man and didn't have the true things of
man. How I would respond to this is by starting off with saying yes it is true that He didn't fully
become man, but He still have all things that man have reason is because He would not be able to
come to save our souls and prolong our lives as well as being kept from condemnation to the point
where you won't have no chance to tell God who you are. We would have been sent straight to hell
without no anymore chances at all. But for Apollinaris saying He didn't have any man–like qualities
or attributes that will show that He has came to us as a man.
In what ways is Christ in his humanity an example to you?
He is an example to me in a way that Love will and can conquer all. Also, being led by the Father
leads you in the right direction, give you knowledge and wisdom to do or say. That trusting in Him
you can receive things that are really more substantial than material

Christology; the Two Nature of Jesus Essay
An angel appeared before a woman named Mary and stated to her that she would give birth to a son.
She would name her son Jesus. Mary being a virgin gave birth to a child, conceived by God through
his Spirit. Jesus being conceived in a supernatural manner became man and God in one creation.
God became incarnate in this child who became known by the name of Jesus (Mathew 1:18–25) .
Jesus was a Palestinian Jew, born in a town south of Jerusalem, raised in Nazareth in a small village
in Galilee. Jesus was not any ordinary child. Jesus was the son of the living God. Not only was He
the son of Mary, He was foremost the Son of God. He was incarnated sent to us for the redemption
of all mankind. So how do we handle the incarnation of God? ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
However, the concept incarnation is at work in the New Testament. The Greek equivalent of
incarnate is found in scripture. The Greek equivalent of incarnate is in carne (en sarki) meaning that
God came in the flesh (1 Timothy 3:16; 1 John 4:2; 2 John 7). Jesus took on the form of man so that
he might bridge the gap between human creation and His father. God sent Jesus as a child to a lost
and dying world. Jesus came to us as human. He did not lay down his divinity and pick up humanity.
He came to us as both divine and human. Through this act God was revealed in a personal way to
humankind, and therefore in a way which is more adequate for a personal God to interact with his
creation. God now was an advocate to his people. He no longer had to communicate his words
through prophets, lawgivers, or even wise men. It allowed God to be united with humanity, so that
he might be able to bear their sins, and make atonement for them in one act of sacrifice and
reconciliation (2 Corinthians 5:19 – 21). What humanity itself could not do was done in human
beings by the Son of God (Romans 5:8) .
Historical Views The two natures of Jesus refers to the doctrine that the one person Jesus has two
natures, (Divine and Human). In theology this is called "the doctrine of the hypostatic union. " it
derives its meaning from the Greek word hypostasis (which is also

The Prophetic Theoristology : Messianic Christology
Messianic Christology envisions Jesus as King and ruler, head over all things eternal and transient.
Calvin's Christology addresses Christ's royal office in three parts; the Prophetic the Priesthood and
Kingship. In Book II Chapter XV Calvin discusses the Kingship of Christ in greater detail.
"Therefore the anointing of the King is not with oil or aromatic unguents. Rather, he is called
"Anointed" (Christus) of God because "the spirit of wisdom and understanding, the spirit of counsel
and might...and of the fear of the Lord have rested upon him."
Calvin engages the spiritual nature of Christ's kingly office by alluding to a 'Christology from
above', expressing an anointing that comes to the Person of Jesus directly from God himself.
While Calvin is accurate in his assessment, the problematic issue at stake in this interpretation of
Jesus as Messiah is that Jesus was not anointed to kingship in a traditional, institutional, or political
capacity. "Popular among the early church was the belief that Jesus' messiahship was futurist, i.e.
Jesus would become Messiah at a future date, for the earliest Church this was the resurrection."
Contrary to that ideology, a Christology from above would maintain Jesus' eternal Kingship. The
expectations of those who anticipated a militaristic messiah met its reality in a martyred Messiah.
Jesus' social context rife with injustice, oppression, and economic inequality under Rome's imperial
dominance, longed for a King who would

Who Exactly Is Redeemed?
Who exactly is redeemed?
Throughout this essay, I have spoken as though redemption is for 'us ' and it is 'our ' salvation that
Barth and Jantzen are discussing. The next issue to address is who exactly is this 'us '. Is it the whole
of humanity? Is it Christians alone? Or is it an elect few?
Barth regularly discussed the flaws of 'man ' and how it is 'man ' whom Jesus saves.123 Although it
shall be assumed when Barth refers to 'man ' instead of 'a man ', he will be discussing the entire of
humanity, his choice of language alone poses issues in his theology. However, this is a complex
matter and will be discussed shortly. Ambiguity is found again in Barth 's writings in his consistent
writing of "we" and "our".456 He does not ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Despite God desiring all to be saved, salvation is possible for those who do profess Christ as Lord.
God in His omniscience knows of all will and do believe, therefore, it could be considered that there
is an elect few who are gifted salvation (Matthew 22:14, James 2:5, 1 Thessalonians 1:4). As
previously mentioned, Barth 's theory of who specifically is redeemed could be considered
unequivocal as he is never specific. However, he could be dependent on the recipients of his
writings to have a working knowledge of the Bible. Therefore, it appears Barth presents that all
those who believe in Jesus have salvation and it is the duty of the Christian Church to spread the
word.
Various issues arise when contemplating who Jantzen proposes who is redeemed. This is because, as
discussed, her idea of what salvation is differs largely from many classic theologians and from
scripture. She does present a parable of St Paul telling a jailor that to receive freedom, he needs to
believe in Jesus Christ.11 However, this is only to bring attention to its inappropriate nature in
context. Therefore, it is reasonable to assert that she does not hold the same opinion as Barth that all
those who believe in Christ are redeemed. This is not to suggest that she believes that not all
Christians have salvation, but instead that

The Not-So-Virgin Birth Of God
The Not–So–Virgin Birth of God by Mitchell Mallary
The Christian faith has truly never been freed from its bondage to Gnostic chains. Today we see
Gnosticism's manifestation in our dismal eschatology – rather than adopting the early Church's hope
for "the resurrection of the dead and the life of the world to come," the masses aspire to an ethereal
bliss in a heavenly beyond.
This misguided eschatology is merely a new form of an old Gnostic influence that has perennially
plagued Christian theology. The Church Fathers had to fight against Docetism – the heretical belief
that Christ only appeared to be human, but was in fact merely a spirit or celestial being. Along with
Arianism and Nestorianism, these three heretical doctrines constituted ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
For if we hold the conviction that the Bible's claims can only be true if they are in accord with
history and science, then something other than the Bible is the final authority – the Enlightenment's
invention of modern historical and scientific analysis.
A Christological Rethinking of the Virgin Birth
Even if there is a theo–political basis for claiming Jesus was born of the Virgin Mary, this does not
mean that it is necessarily wrong. As mentioned above, it's even attested to in the Nicene Creed. But
what if there were a Christological reason for calling the virgin birth into question?
On the one hand, virgin birth theology has often served as a helpful explanatory tool for adherents to
what is commonly called "two–nature" Christology – the idea that Jesus was both fully God and
fully human. In a way (though I've always thought it bore the stench of Nestorianism), it allowed
theologians the explanatory power to say how it was that the one person of Jesus was constituted by
two separate natures – divine and human. But in the early Church's battle to stave off Arianism and
those who rejected the full divinity of Christ, virgin birth theology was a crucial

Simon As A Christ Figure Analysis
The Christ Figure
A Christ figure could be interpreted as an individual that is a manifestation or delegation of Jesus
Christ. It is apparent to distinguish a Christ–like human from someone of common characteristics by
their alluring behavior. For instance, one could define this feature using appearance, personality, and
attitude. The Lord of the Flies is a novel that opens up with a plane departing a group of schoolboys
from Britain that had been shot down over a desolate island. Britain had been in the depths of a war
and these school kids go to extreme in means of survival. Initially, the boys relished the idea of not
having any adults with them until they had realized they could not possibly live without them for
long. Simon, one of the schoolboys on the island, was introduced as a spiritual, kind–hearted
kid.Acknowledging he possess these components, Simon appears detached from the rest of the boys.
This essay will demonstrate how the novel portrays Simon as a "Christ Figure" by the way he
performs on the island, such as his seclusion and peaceful nature, his appearance, his actions
towards the boys, and his death.
Simon primarily is isolated from all that is occurring on the island. He portrays himself as one of the
sane boys considering the rest had exposed savage like demeanor from remaining on the island for
an extended amount of time. " Simon paused. He looked over his shoulder as Jack had done at the
close ways behind him and glanced swiftly round to confirm

The Second Point Cyril Argues Against Nestorius Essay
The third point Cyril argues against Nestorius is that Jesus has two subjects. He questions who is
speaking man or deity. Cyril questions that there are two ruling principles with the Logos and the
human soul. He argues about where Nestorius says there is one will but not one person who is
divided. And where Nestorius says the two natures are united permanently but unique and separate
like a husband and wife. Cyril says that Christ exists in a hypostatic union which is not a
conjunction of wills and not 2 subjects but a single subject. He describes this as just like the human
soul and body has a natural union. You cannot have a soul without a body nor a body without a soul.
The incarnation happened in the same way of a human birth. The Logos connected to the human
soul as it connected to the human body. Cyril continues that the Word is different to flesh and the
soul but was passed through the womb of Mary, Christ's earthly mother. The body is created in the
womb of the earthly mother but that earthly mother the mother of the body is also the mother of the
soul because the soul is fashioned in the womb alongside the body at the same time. The flesh
mother is also the soul's mother. A mother only gives birth to one living creature. Christ, according
to Cyril, is one man formed with two things occurring simultaneously in a natural union with
properties being mingled in the one body. Humans are composite beings being comprised of both
body and soul without the ability to

Essay on A Good Man is Hard to Find: The Cross of Two...
The Cross of Two Spiritual Paths: The Characterization of the Grandmother and the Misfit and How
Their Rendezvous Connects Them Both to a Religious Awakening of Faith, Grace, and Salvation.
Obeying Pontius Pilate's orders, the Roman soldiers nailed Jesus onto a cross but not before
ridiculing and physically beating him. At nine o' clock in the morning, the men proceeded to crucify
him along with two robbers. One of the robbers joined the soldiers in lampooning Jesus while the
other one asked for forgiveness in hopes of reserving his place in Heaven; within hours, all three
men had died. The concepts of faith, death, and salvation exemplified in the aforementioned
anecdote continually permeate the text of Flannery O'Connor's short ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The aforementioned book also comments that the Grandmother persists that the Misfit's inability to
shoot the family lies in the fact that he comes from a "good family" (1984). Moreover, the
Grandmother honestly believes that she possesses the "goodness" of a Christian and the fact that this
characteristic could somehow alter her fate (Ochshorn 298). Stanley Renner insists that the problem,
however, is that although the Grandmother appears to others as a religiously devout person, her
shallow view of goodness is saturated with nothing more than the culture–refined thoughts of the
small–minded mores (26). Similarly, Stephen Bandy implies that the Grandmother's faith is
embedded into her only skin–deep as to feign the semblance of a devout Christian when, in reality,
she understands "nothing of the religion"; the Grandmother's external religion is completely of "the
lip–serving variety" (3). Renner comments that the mindless reiteration of Jesus' name could be
viewed as blasphemy– using the lord's name in vain (20). She does not fully comprehend the Bible
although she will quickly invoke the name of Jesus: "Maybe he didn't raise the dead," she responds
to the Misfit's protest, for it hardly matters to her, "one way or the other," because the divinity of
Jesus retains little importance for the Grandmother (Bandy 37). Instead of

Essay on 4Mat Book Review Family to Family
Abstract
Family to Family is a book written by the author Dr. Jerry Pipes and Victor Lee. Dr. Pipes is a leader
with the North American Mission Board. He travels around the world speaking to audiences through
various conferences and workshops, training and equipping many in how to change lives for Christ.
He is an accomplished author, husband and father.
Victor Lee is from Knoxville, Tennessee. He attends the First Baptist Concord Church, where he
serves as the Young Adults Minister. For over twenty–two years he has become an accomplished
author of several books, and an editor of a variety of Christian publications. He acts as a Sports
Evangelism Consultant for the North American Mission Board. Victor Lee is an accomplished, ...
My husband and I have incorporated these same principles in our household. I too know and have
felt that same joy my parents felt with each of our six children. Pipes and Lee said it best, "That is
what this book is about: raising your family to follow Christ."4 This is what the Word of God tells
us as believers as well, "Fathers, do not exasperate your children; instead, bring them up in the
training and instruction of the Lord."5
Reflection
Although I truly enjoyed reading Family to Family by authors Pipes and Lee, I find that this book
was really focused on those parents who already know and have a relationship with Jesus Christ and
want or need to build a better Christ centered family life. In reading this book I feel that today, there
are so many non–believers who could benefit from the teaching principles in this book. We are all so
busy these days. We are like ships passing in the wind, always coming and going. We as parents
have to be willing to stop and stand for something within our families. Otherwise what are we really
passing on to our children and their children? We must be mission driven within our families just as
we are in the business world. The authors Pipes and Lee do a great job in pointing this fact out. I
would have liked to see more information to help the reader the parent and future parents to
understand the why this is important. The authors might have used more relevant or popular facts
pertaining to society

Is Jesus Christ Our Lord?
We are very blessed to have you as a member of our parish. By having such a strong community we
are able to bind and connect together through Jesus Christ our Lord. It is time we stop sitting on the
sidelines of the field and become the main players when it comes to getting involved in the issues
that are going on not only throughout our community and city but as well as national and
international issues. This sense of involvement will provide a fulfillment that will come along with a
sense of fellowship. Jesus Christ our Lord has placed each and every single one of us on this earth in
order for us to accomplish good things in our community and the world that we live in. By getting
involved we are able to express our love for Jesus Christ. Grace to you and peace from God our
Father and the Lord Jesus Christ. (Romans 1: 7) First we would like to give thanks to God through
Jesus Christ our Lord for every single one of you. It is your strong faith that is proclaimed
throughout the community that brings all of us together. God is your witness, who you serve every
single day in proclaiming the gospel. In order for us to come together as a community and
communicate in a way that will help us find a solution to the issues that are going on today, we must
be "mutually encouraged by one another's faith,"(Romans 1: 12) We urge you brothers and sisters in
the name of Jesus Christ our Lord, that all of you work together and be united in the same purpose.
That of the issues that is

Hypostatic Union: Who Was He?
Who was Jesus? That is the ultimate question of Christianity. In fact, many say, "Christianity is
Christ."1 Therefore, getting this question correct means everything. So, was Jesus God? Was he a
man? Or was he some sort of combination of the two? And does this even matter? These questions
plagued the early followers of Jesus so much that a formal statement of belief was created in which
the term Hypostatic Union was used to fully explain who Jesus was. Therefore, Hypostatic Union is
clearly seen in the Scriptures, gives power to the work of Christ, and combats heresies within the
church. First of all, the early church faced challenges the further they went in time from Jesus; and
by 451 there was a need to clearly state who Jesus was. In the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In other words, remove the incarnation and all of Christianity falls apart. However, what does the
incarnation mean? Was it simply God pretending to be a man? Was Jesus a certain percentage of
man and divinity? Perhaps fifty–fifty? The truth of the incarnation is, Christ being both fully God
and fully man; and therefore is the only one able to truly save humanity. The reason the Hypostatic
Union is so key is because it is what gives the cross of Christ its power. If a man had just died, it
would have simply been a sad story. Yet because Jesus was perfect man and God, he was able to
overcome sin, death and evil. Finally, as much as the Hypostatic Union is foundational to all of
Christianity, its main purpose was to combat heresies that had risen inside the church. For example,
the Hypostatic Union defeated Docetism–the belief that "Christ only appeared to be human and
fleshly; in fact, he was only spiritual."9 Also, Adoptionism, the belief that Jesus was just a man, yet
God simply adopted him for a special purpose,10 was refuted through the Hypostatic

The Sermon 71 : On The Lord 's Resurrection
Pope St. Leo the Great
Sermon 71: On the Lord's Resurrection, I.; Delivered on Holy Saturday in the Vigil of Easter
Pope St. Leo the Great addressed the faithful on Vigil of Easter speaking on the Lord's resurrection.
He weaves through the sermon Christological theme of the Jesus Christ's hypostatic union,
particularly his humanity, in order to redeem mankind. The focus of this sermon is of no surprise for
the heresies of Nestorianism, Eutychianism, Docetism and Marcionism disputing Christ's humanity,
which were prevalent during his lifetime. This sermon on the Lord's resurrection is one encouraging
the faithful to grow in discipline of the body in order to contemplate the divine. The emphasis on the
body is taken up for two reasons. One, humanity is called to actively participate in the sacrifice and
resurrection of Christ in tangible ways. Christ is the perfect model to doing Gods will even with the
obstacles of human nature. Secondly, many heresies at the time deny Chris's humanity and thus
Pope Leo was emphasizing this vital Truth as a way to catechize his flock. Repeatedly in his
sermon, Pope Leo emphasized the hypostatic union of Christ, in particular his human nature, in the
resurrection. This is in direct opposition with the heresy of Marcion present during the pontiff's
lifetime. This heresy did not believe Jesus became fully human but rather his human–ness was a
façade, which he shed after the crucifixion for the "resurrection does not extend to the flesh"

The Arguments Of Athanasius And Arius At The Council Of...
Critically evaluate the arguments of Athanasius and Arius at the Council of Nicaea
The Patristic Era saw various controversies arising over the nature of Jesus Christ, which
consequently lead to the establishment of the creed as an attempt to reject the heretical views held
by proponents. An example of a heretical advocate is Arius, who suggested Christ was inferior to
God, but still above other creatures (McGrath, 2001, p.358). However, early orthodox theologians
disputed this idea due to the soteriological complications that accompanied it (Young, 2010, p.55).
The central advocator of this dispute was Athanasius, who questioned how Arius' belief allowed for
salvation through Jesus Christ, which is a key orthodox belief identified ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
This heretical view is further fought against through Athanasius' extensive focus on Jesus' death and
the implications that this had on humanity as told by the Bible (Young, 2010, p.55); Romans (10:9)
explicitly states Jesus is the Lord and the only route to salvation. So it can be argued, if Jesus is not
God, as Arius suggests, then it is not possible for humanity to reach salvation, which results in
diminishment of the purpose of Christian faith. Thus, it is acceptable to assume that the Nicene
Creed's assertion of the homoousious relationship of God and Jesus, as a rejection of Arianism, was
essential to early Christian theology because it provided certainty for the establishment of the faith.
Although the consubstantial nature of Jesus and God was confirmed at Nicaea, it wasn't definitively
defined because Arians responded with another heretical view: Jesus and God were homoiousious.
The belief that God and Jesus were only similar in nature allowed for subordinationism to manifest,
which was a heresy that asserted God the Father was superior to Jesus and the Holy Spirit
(Williams, 2001, p.133). So this belief accepts the Trinity but has misinterpreted the orthodox
declaration of the idea. Arius told of the unequal glories amongst each "distinct being" within the
Trinity (Williams, 2001, p.102). This was scorned by Athanasius who knew of the homoousious
relationship through scripture (Colossians 2:9), which is how God expresses

Critical Review of “Theology: the Basics” Essay
Critical Review: Theology; The Basics
By: Luke Knoll
Survey Of Christian Beliefs
Kerry Pretty
Pacific Life Bible College
Theology: The Basics; Critical Review As Christians we often believe certain things simply because
it's what our parents and the people around us believe. We often go about our Christian walk without
ever giving thought or reason to why we believe what we do. The world of Christian Theology is a
place where Christians can find answer to the 'what and why' of Christianity. If we are able to begin
comprehending Christian Theology and the rudimental knowledge of it, then we can take it with us
into more in depth books and discussions about theology, know the importance of it and how vital it
is for Christians ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In doing this McGrath lets our minds have enough backstory to more easily understand the
information given. After giving historical background McGrath breaks down the topic in a very
clear format. When talking about Jesus (pg. 58–76) He talks about why Jesus is important
"Christology", but then he educates us by breaking down the considerably large topic of Jesus into
more manageable categories such as the names of Jesus; Messiah, Lord, Son of God, Son of Man,
God. After going through the names of Jesus he then educates us on other important theological
discussions of Jesus like: Functional statements about Jesus, Early Christological Models, The
Council of Chalcedon, The incarnation and icons, and Christ as mediator. Then after discussing the
'meat' of the topic he then gives us an opportunity to "Engage with a text" at the end of every topic.
These texts give different examples and opinions for each topic and then McGrath gives the reader a
short series of questions for individual or small group discussion about the text/topic he had given.
Though McGrath did do a very good job at giving us insight on the historical background of the
topics and also educated us in a very easy, elementary level on the theology, he lacked personal
touch. In this I'm talking about some personal stories or experiences from his life that has helped
him engage these theological terms and ideas. It was very "theological" in its approach, however the
simple addition of some personal

I Am A Monk From A Small Church
Hello my fellow Christians. I come to you today in deep personal peril. I have built my career
making Icon frames my entire life. I once felt I was helping people seek refuge with our glorious
god. Connecting them to not just to our holy saints but also to Christ himself. Yet now I stand
wondering if I have strayed them wrong. Have I sent my fellow men, woman, and even children to
damnation while I profit. I am a monk before an artisan, yet I may have cursed my fellow followers
to hell.
This is why I am here, I want find out if what I have been doing helping or hurting innocent souls,
and if so to repent my sins. I look toward you all and ask that you look at this with not your minds or
wallets, but instead with our souls and look toward god for guidance. In these trying times we need
him more then ever
I am not a very educated man; I am a monk from a small church in Constantinople. I make religious
object, including icon frames to help myself and others connect to god. I make very intricate frames
with precious metals, such as gold, and jewels for churches (Carr pp. 195) but I also make simple
ones for the peasants to have in their homes. I take time making sure each frame, no matter how
simple, highlights the holiness of who ever is depicted in the icon.
When I view the final work, I always viewed it as a celebration of the person, especially Christ. I
look at it a remember Christ's sacrifices for my sins and the rest of this world filled with sins of
every kind. When

Monothelitism as Opposed to Dyothelitism
Monothelitism is a subject concerning Jesus having two natures but one will. The opposing, which
is commonly known as Dyothelitism, is the idea that Jesus has both two natures and two wills.
Monothelitism was a heresy that occurred during the 7th century. (Chapman) This controversy
started with Emperor Heraclius who wanted to unite people under one idea. With the help of Sergius
of Constantinople, they got Pope Honorius to agree with the idea that Christ had one energy. Pope
Honorius, however, was later condemned of heresy. Sophronius, a monk who lived in Palestine,
disagreed with the compromise that was made, he made it clear that he thought that Dyothelitism
was an important aspect of Christianity. In 638, the Emperor responded to Sophronius' ideas with an
edict titled "Exposition of the Faith" which said that people were no longer permitted to discuss the
matter, and that Christ had one will. ("History of the Christian Church...") There was support for this
idea, though there was resistance as well. Specifically, Maximus Confessor and Pope Martinus.
These two were very strong in their position of support for Dyothelitism. In 648, Emperor Constans
II made an edict titled "Type" that he hoped would create peace. The edict called for silence on the
topic that was being debated, and took a neutral view on the subject. The emperor was later
informed that Monothelitism had been declared a heresy. Constans II, in response to this,
imprisoned the pope and made sure he received

Christology
Christology is important for me to understand my own form of Christianity. But there is a danger
here, too. According my study of this topic, the Christology can be very disturbing for me as divinity
major who come to study more about faith background. I find hard because some authors they have
always taken the topic to far too represent the faith. The study of Christology opens up questions
over what one believes and how that belief impacts one's life. I think it not only me struggling about
this top but I hope most people find themselves stumbling into areas or questions that they had never
before considered. Furthermore, how much more we might say about this axiom apply to the
Pauline epistles. Paul had ability to make a relatively clear point to us. Therefore, I affirm that
Christianity has always been a faith in the Incarnation in one form or another. We can be sure as ...
Rather than an image of the descending preexistent redeemer, Dunn argues that this is a case rather
of Paul's Second Adam Christology (Dunn258f). The author says "Incarnation became steadily more
central as the decisive act of redemption–a tendency already evident in Irenaeus who can speak of
Christ 'attaching man to God by his own incarnation' (Adv. Haer. V.1.1) so that later theology had to
look for meaning in Christ's death more as the paying of a ransom to the devil than as the ending of
the first Adam that last Adam might come to be" ( Dunn 128). I think Dunn was argued about the
Romans 3.23 "All have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God," Dunn translates hysterountai
not as "fallen short" but as "fail to reach" as in "All have sinned and failed to reach the glory of
God." In other words Dunn is attempting to say "they lack the glory of God in the sense that they
fail to reach the eschatological glory in which only the righteous will share...there is a growing
consensus among recent commentators that the primary allusion is to the glory once enjoyed by
Adam"

The Two Natures Of Jesus Christ
Before we discuss about the two natures of Christ, we should know the definition of nature itself.
Nature is the essential qualities of something that which make it what it is. All being in this world
has their own nature which usually a thing or a person only has one nature, for examples, a human
absolutely only has a human nature and the animal only has their animal natures, but Jesus Christ
has two natures at once in Himself which is the human nature and the divine nature. Jesus is the
second person of Trinity which is He is God that has the divine nature, but when He took a flesh and
being a human, He is also has the human nature. Jesus is 100% God and 100% human.
Karl Barth said that Jesus Christ is the "true man" which is visible and He is also the "true God"
which is invisible, He is both the God who has took a flesh to be a human who is exalted to God.
(Bloesch, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
2. Finitum non capax infiniti
This concept is just like a bucket and the sea water. Even that is a big bucket it still cannot bear the
sea water, because the sea water is infinity while the bucket is finite. The bucket can only bear a
bucket of the sea water, not all of the sea water. Finitum non capax infiniti means, the finite and
itself cannot bear or receive the infinite. Andrew M. McGinnis said that when the reformed appealed
to this principle, it is closely connected to the extra Calvinisticum, this principle was a feature of
Reformed Christology that expressed the finitude of Christ's manhood "and therefore its incapacity
for receiving divine attributes, such as omnipotence, omniscience and omnipresent" (McGinnis,
2014). The human nature which is finite, cannot bear the divine nature which is infinite.
There are four implications of this principles which

The Revelation Of The Lord Jesus Christ
"In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God, and the Word was God" (John 1:1
KJV). This familiar passage of scripture recorded in the Gospel of John indicates the deity and or
preexistence of Jesus Christ prior to time as we know it and before the creation of earth. The
strongest proof that the Lord Jesus Christ is God are the divine attributes, divine names, divine
works, divine worship, divine claims and divine relationship ascribed to Him. Jesus himself also
made claims which could only have been made by God. He said He was one with God in John 10:30
and that "I and my Father are one." In verse 38 of the same chapter it states"...believe that the Father
is in me, and I in Him." He claimed to love as God the Father Loves in Matthew 10:37, 38. These
periscopes declare for us a oneness, interconnectedness and mutual divine status within these texts.
For Jesus to accept such claims, worship, names and works as ascribed or attributed to Him, if He
were not God, would be blasphemy. For a saint to have such claims or have accepted such homage
to this degree would have been a sin worthy of death.
Jesus ministry was to save mankind from their sins, to destroy the works of the devil and to fulfill
the Old Testament. Luke 19:10 tells us that the Son of man has come to seek and save that which
was lost.
Kwok Pui Lan is an Asian feminist wrestles the very notion of Christology as being to
anthropocentric, partially due to the fact that there is no word in the

The Person of Christ Essay
The Person of Christ
When discussing and proving the person of Christ, there are two basic laws that must be addressed
and proven. First you must prove that Christ is one hundred percent human (humanity), then you
must prove that at the same time Christ is one hundred percent God (deity). As human, Christ had a
body, he had a soul and spirit, he had human characteristics, and he was called by human names. In
Luke 2:52, it is written that Christ, even though he had a virgin birth, He was born with a human
body that was conceived by a human body. Christ's humanity included both the material and
immaterial aspects of the human body (he was flesh but at the same time he was also Soul and
Spirit). For Christians,
"The elements of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
385)". It took not only the humanity of Christ, but also his deity to affect the world in this way. In
the view of His deity, Christ is God. Not only is he Christ, but the Son of God, and called God in the
New Testament. "The Johannine teaching includes the following passages: John 1:1, 18, where some
manuscripts read 'the only begotten God,' and that unusual reading may be regarded as grounds for
accepting its authenticity; 20:28,
where Thomas used both kurios and theos of Jesus; and 1 John 5:20. It is preferable to ascribe the
phrase 'God blessed forever' to Christ (Ryre Basic Theology p. 56)".
Apart from his distinction as human, there is evidence of oneness. The New Testament insists that
there is only one true God in James 2:19 as it states, "You believe that there is only God. Good!
Even the demons believe that –and shudder." Christ is part of the Trinity and is recognized as God in
creation–John 1:3, judge of all things in the future–john 5:27, and he has omniscience–Matthew 9:4.
Charles Ryre proves Christ's deity and involvement in the Trinity in Basic Theology, as he writes,
"How then do we arrive at a clear doctrine of the Trinity? Simply by accepting two lines of evidence
in the bible: (a) clear statements that teach there is only one God; and (b)equally clear statements
that there was Someone

Malik Johnson. Professor Cimorelli. Th 334-001. 1 May 2017.
Malik Johnson
Professor Cimorelli
TH 334–001
1 May 2017
The Understanding of Jesus Christ
Throughout history, there is a copious amount of notable figures who were able to change the world
around them. Jesus Christ, after his crucifixion, left an imprint on the human race with the
establishment of Christianity and the spread of his beliefs through his followers. His
accomplishments that were recorded in the Gospels will continue through the ages, spreading his
wisdom and way of thinking. Even though it would beneficial for believers to truly fathom his
significance to history and the human soul, challenges ascend that hold its effectiveness back.
To better understand Jesus Christ, agreements needed to be made between Christians to prevent ...
While the Councils of Nicea and Chalcedon allow for a more elucidated understand of Christ, the
reality of other factors inhibits its full potential. There are factors that exist which produce the
opposite effect. Several issues, including history, philosophy, and language, impede the attempt to
better apprehend Jesus Christ. In regards to the issue with history, there is an inverse relationship
between the desire for Jesus' history with the current amount of information that humanity has
recorded of him. For a religious figure who has left an immeasurable amount of influence onto
mankind with his abilities, interactions with others, humility, and ultimate sacrifice, procuring more
knowledge on this being would a great benefit to Christological studies. There would be no amount
of books large enough to contain the knowledge of the Messiah's actions that are not already
detailed (O'Collins 2). This unquantifiable yearning for learning is unfortunately contrasted with the
amount of detailed information on him currently available after nearly two millennia. There are not
many details that the world knows about Jesus Christ since "he left no letters or other personal
documents" (O'Collins 2). Not a lot of information is known about the Redeemer before he
established his "public ministry"

The Church Went Through A Period Of Cruel Persecution
INTRODUCTION
The Church went through a period of cruel persecution under various Roman Empire emperors prior
to the 4th century. The church also had to go through the issue with heretics inside the church.
During this crucial period in church history, one of the important theological and ecclesiastical
question concerned Christology. Christology deals with the life of Jesus Christ. One bishop, Arius,
taught that Jesus was not God the Son. God providentially sent a man, St. Athanasius, to defend the
Lord's church. St. Athanasius, bishop of Alexandria, became an important figure in church history.
The cconflict with Arius and the successive Roman emperors shaped Athanasius 's ministry career.
Why is Athanasius important for the life ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
His work affects issues in the church today. For example, "The Jehovah's Witnesses, in their
rejection of the deity of Christ and the doctrine of the Trinity, not only follow in the footsteps of
Arius, but hold him up as one of the great defenders of the "true" faith".
"Alexandria was a leading commercial and cultural center in the Mediterranean world, second only
to Rome itself". "...Alexandria became a great Christian learning center, the home of the great
catechetical school of Christian instruction..." this is the place where Athanasius would get his
education. More importantly, "The background to the conflict lay in the church of Alexandria".
St. Athanasius was born around the year AD 297 to a Christian family in the city of Alexandria. His
parents were wealthy enough to afford giving him a fine secular education. At the young age of 10
years old, in A.D. 306, there was a baptism ritual with other children. Playing the part of a church
official, he baptized one of the children during this sacrament of baptism. He impressed the bishop
of Alexandria, Alexander, which he became one of his disciples.
He writes his treaties to Macarius, true lover of Christ. "In 318 Athanasius wrote his most famous
work, De Incarnatione Verbi (On the Incarnation of the Word"), which shows the influence of
Irenaeus and Origen; the incarnate Logos was divine and restored

Paul Tillich, a Guide for Christianity within a...
Paul Tillich, a Guide for Christianity within a Pluralistic Society
Introduction In this paper I will discuss the significance of Paul Tillich's theology within our current
pluralistic society. I hope to accomplish this by specifically addressing how certain concepts within
his Theology, when embraced or applied, can begin to relieve western Christianity's concern for
remaining "relevant". I will also present some of Tillich's theological ideas concerning his
Christology, characteristics of a symbol, and concept of God as a symbol.
I. The Christology of Tillich:
Jesus as the Christ
Tillich suggests in the article "A Reinterpretation of the Doctrine of the Incarnation" that Christians
do not have a purely historiographical interest in the man known as Jesus, but a thriving interest in
the Christ. He elaborates by saying the reports about Jesus of Nazareth found in the gospels are the
reports of Jesus as the Christ, not just a man. Tillich finds that mere historical research cannot tear
down the foundation of Christianity because there is immense power in the symbol of "Christ" (a
topic later discussed in the essay).
Tillich, despite what many assume, consistently presented Jesus as the Christ. It is true that Tillich
wrote articles with titles such as "A Reinterpretation of the Doctrine of the Incarnation" (which
shocked many Protestant leaders in the late 1940's). However, Tillich reinterpreted Doctrine in an
attempt to reveal the truths that he believed were at

The Incarnation Of God By John Clark And Marcus Johnson Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Crystal Torres

More from Crystal Torres (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

The Incarnation Of God By John Clark And Marcus Johnson Essay