1) Was the arrest of Mayo a legal arrest? Discuss why. Please include the components of a reasonable arrest and whether or not they were met with Mayo. Yes, the arrest of Mayo was a legal arrest. Mayo was arrested without a warrant due to probable cause. Probable cause is when the officer has a reasonable belief in the guilt of the suspect based on articulable facts and information gathered prior to the arrest (Legal Information Institute, 2020). Since there was probable cause for Mayo’s arrest, the officers did not need to obtain an arrest warrant prior to placing Mayo in custody. From the information gathered in the original scenario, officers could reasonably believe Mayo was guilty of a criminal offense. At a minimum, officers had every legal right to detain Mayo for further questioning regarding the incident.  2) Did law enforcement need an arrest warrant prior to arresting Mayo? Discuss why. Make sure to support your thoughts. No, law enforcement did not need an arrest warrant prior to arresting Mayo. As previously stated, officers had developed probable cause to arrest Mayo on scene based on the facts presented to them. Law enforcement could have obtained a warrant if they had wanted to, but this creates several more hoops to jump through for the officers. In my jurisdiction, we have to complete a warrant request, which lays out the facts and probable cause for why we want to obtain a warrant. We then have to call the on-call State’s Attorney so they can review the warrant. After this is complete, the officers and State’s Attorney will meet with a judge to have the warrant approved and signed. As I said, this is not necessary since officers developed probable cause on scene. respond to this discussion question in 100 words .

1. 1) Was the arrest of Mayo a legal arrest? Discuss why. Please
include the components of a reasonable arrest and whether or
not they were met with Mayo.
Yes, the arrest of Mayo was a legal arrest. Mayo was arrested
without a warrant due to probable cause. Probable cause is when
the officer has a reasonable belief in the guilt of the suspect
based on articulable facts and information gathered prior to the
arrest (Legal Information Institute, 2020). Since there was
probable cause for Mayo’s arrest, the officers did not need to
obtain an arrest warrant prior to placing Mayo in custody. From
the information gathered in the original scenario, officers could
reasonably believe Mayo was guilty of a criminal offense. At a
minimum, officers had every legal right to detain Mayo for
further questioning regarding the incident.
2) Did law enforcement need an arrest warrant prior to arresting
Mayo? Discuss why. Make sure to support your thoughts.
No, law enforcement did not need an arrest warrant prior to
arresting Mayo. As previously stated, officers had developed
probable cause to arrest Mayo on scene based on the facts
presented to them. Law enforcement could have obtained a
warrant if they had wanted to, but this creates several more
hoops to jump through for the officers. In my jurisdiction, we
have to complete a warrant request, which lays out the facts and
probable cause for why we want to obtain a warrant. We then
have to call the on-call State’s Attorney so they can review the
warrant. After this is complete, the officers and State’s Attorney
will meet with a judge to have the warrant approved and signed.
As I said, this is not necessary since officers developed
probable cause on scene.

2. respond to this discussion question in 100 words