Record, Jeffrey. "The Mystery Of Pearl Harbor." Military History 28.5 (2012): 28-39.Academic Search Complete. Web. 10 Dec. 2013. According to the article "The Mystery of Pearl Harbor," it briefly examines the reason why Japan starts a war with the United States. On December 7th, 1941, Japan with about 182 aircrafts from the first assault invade U.S. Pacific fleet of Pearl Harbor. Japan's ultimate goal was to overthrow East Asia. The main point of this article is mainly for Japan's goal for economic security and determined to achieve their goal to conquer East Asia. Moreover, they wouldn't let U.S. stop them. Japan was humiliated to be dependent on the United States, including American imported oil. Ultimately, they fought a war that could not won since U.S. was more superior. United States outproduce Japan in every category of ammunition and armaments. If someone were to ask me what this article was about, I would say that this article is an inevitable defeat from Japan. I believe this source was definitely helpful. This article made me realize how important Pearl Harbor is. If anything, we could have lost to the Japanese and everything would change. Personally, I believe our army played a significant role during the war between Japan and United States. I believe that this source is reliable. This source can be slightly biased because in the article, it says “If the Pacific War was inevitable, was not Japan's crushing defeat as well? If so, then why did Japan start a war that, as British strategist Colin Gray has argued, it "was always going to lose?” This article can clearly be used for a American history classes. Several of the first paragraphs include a clear understanding and a great topic for students to discuss. This would benefit students who does not know anything about Pearl Harbor. This would be appropriate for students to realize what America has been through during the 1940’s. I admit I now have a better understanding of Pearl Harbor, this article enhanced my perspective and changed the way I view it. Hanyok, Robert J. "The Pearl Harbor Warning That Never Was." Naval History 23.2 (2009): 50-53. Academic Search Complete. Web. 11 Dec. 2013. This article particularly argues that Americans believe that the surprising attack from Japan Navy planes could not have happened without some sort of conspiracy or warning. Without a doubt, Americans thought that U.S. political and military leaders kept this serious warning from Pearl Harbor’s commanders. Furthermore, the National Security Agency Documentary, “West Wind Clear seemed to be not found. Robert Hanyok’s attempted to clear up the issue and as a result, the warning for the chief Navy doe- breaker was just a figment of his imagination. I believe that this article offers reliable sources. Hanyok provides source documents for historical scholars and researchers. This article was extremely helpful due to the controversy with the “West Wind Clear. The goal of this article was basically des ...

1. Record, Jeffrey. "The Mystery Of Pearl Harbor." Military
History 28.5 (2012): 28-39.Academic Search Complete. Web. 10
Dec. 2013.
According to the article "The Mystery of Pearl Harbor," it
briefly examines the reason why Japan starts a war with the
United States. On December 7th, 1941, Japan with about 182
aircrafts from the first assault invade U.S. Pacific fleet of Pearl
Harbor. Japan's ultimate goal was to overthrow East Asia. The
main point of this article is mainly for Japan's goal for
economic security and determined to achieve their goal to
conquer East Asia. Moreover, they wouldn't let U.S. stop them.
Japan was humiliated to be dependent on the United States,
including American imported oil. Ultimately, they fought a war
that could not won since U.S. was more superior. United States
outproduce Japan in every category of ammunition and
armaments. If someone were to ask me what this article was
about, I would say that this article is an inevitable defeat from
Japan.
I believe this source was definitely helpful. This article made
me realize how important Pearl Harbor is. If anything, we could
have lost to the Japanese and everything would change.
Personally, I believe our army played a significant role during
the war between Japan and United States. I believe that this
source is reliable. This source can be slightly biased because in
the article, it says “If the Pacific War was inevitable, was not
Japan's crushing defeat as well? If so, then why did Japan start
a war that, as British strategist Colin Gray has argued, it "was
always going to lose?”
This article can clearly be used for a American history classes.
Several of the first paragraphs include a clear understanding and
a great topic for students to discuss. This would benefit students
who does not know anything about Pearl Harbor. This would be
appropriate for students to realize what America has been
through during the 1940’s. I admit I now have a better

2. understanding of Pearl Harbor, this article enhanced my
perspective and changed the way I view it.
Hanyok, Robert J. "The Pearl Harbor Warning That Never Was."
Naval History 23.2 (2009): 50-53. Academic Search Complete.
Web. 11 Dec. 2013.
This article particularly argues that Americans believe that the
surprising attack from Japan Navy planes could not have
happened without some sort of conspiracy or warning. Without
a doubt, Americans thought that U.S. political and military
leaders kept this serious warning from Pearl Harbor’s
commanders. Furthermore, the National Security Agency
Documentary, “West Wind Clear seemed to be not found.
Robert Hanyok’s attempted to clear up the issue and as a result,
the warning for the chief Navy doe- breaker was just a figment
of his imagination.
I believe that this article offers reliable sources. Hanyok
provides source documents for historical scholars and
researchers. This article was extremely helpful due to the
controversy with the “West Wind Clear. The goal of this article
was basically designed to dispose any theory, inconvenience
conspiracy concerning the baseless documentary. This
documentary was completely different from “The Mystery of
Pearl Harbor” because how the articles differ in different
concepts and speculations. This article was more of an
observation rather than facts.
This article has changed how I think about this topic because
this keeps me wondering. What if there was a warning before
the Japanese Navy planes came? I’m pretty sure our U.S. navy
would be more than capable. However, what is done can not be
changed. This source can be helpful to me and can be used in
the curriculum for a philosophy class. According to a
philosopher named Kant, people have only one intention which
is duty. If the West Wind Clear was never intercepted and really
was a warning for the US navy, the outcome would be
completely different. This can be an appropriate topic to discuss

3. for a philosophy class because it is interesting and keeps you
wondering.
Dudley, Wade G. "Hallowed Ground... A Date Which Will Live
In Infamy." Military History 28.5 (2012): 32-36. Academic
Search Complete. Web. 11 Dec. 2013.
This article by Dudley talks the history of Pearl Harbor’s
bombing at the naval American base in Oahu, Hawaii on
December 7th, 1941. This informs us how the United States
took the first step into the World War 2. The Americans were
not involved until the USS Ward struck the first American shots
of World War II, sinking a Japanese Ko-hyoteki-class midget
sub as they desired to enter Pearl Harbor. Moreover, the
Japanese aircrafts fired at will destroying about 200 aircraft at
the airfields of Oahu. They killed and demolished 2,402 service
men. Germany later declared war on us two days later.
This article was moderately different from the article “The
Mystery of Pearl Harbor” because these articles are different in
plethora of ways. This article talks about how Japan brought us
to World War 2 while the other talks about why Japan attacked
Pearl Harbor. The goal of this article is to classify the remains
of the 34,000 Americans who died during the invasion.
As a result, this article represents Americans who risked their
lives for the people of the United States. Dudley gives an
opportunity to we as people to honor and show our respect
towards them. I feel as if our lives are more than grateful. This
source changed the way I view Pearl Harbor because this gives
me honor and a reason to be content. We can evaluate and use
this reference appropriately in the same manner for our younger
generation to learn.
Title
ABC/123 Version X
1

4. Case Study Two Worksheet
PSYCH/660 Version 2
1
University of Phoenix MaterialCase Study Two Worksheet
Respond to the following questions in 1,250 to 1,500 words.
1. Why is this an ethical dilemma? Which APA Ethical
Principles help frame the nature of the dilemma?
2. How might Irina’s age and parents’ involvement in the
referral affect how Dr. Matthews can resolve the dilemma? How
might the state law on treatment of minors and HIPAA rule on
access of guardians to a minor’s health care record influence
Dr. Matthews’ decision?
3. How are APA Ethical Standards 2.01a b, and c; 2.04; 3.04;
3.06; 4.01; 4.02; and 10.10a relevant to this case? Which other
standards might apply?
4. What are Dr. Matthews’ ethical alternatives for resolving this
dilemma? Which alternative best reflects the Ethics Code
aspirational principle and enforceable standard, as well as legal
standards and Dr. Matthews’ obligations to stakeholders?
5. What steps should Dr. Matthews take to ethically implement
her decision and monitor its effects?
Reference
Fisher, C. B. (2013). Decoding the ethics code: A practical
guide for psychologists. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Copyright © XXXX by University of Phoenix. All rights
reserved.
Copyright © 2014 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
Case 2. Cultural Values and Competent

5. Mental Health Services to Minors
Irina, a 13-year-old girl of Arabic cultural heritage living in
Boston, Massachusetts, was brought by her parents to a hospital
emergency room after an assault by a stranger. Based on her
injuries, the hospital staff suspected that the attacker had also
sexually assaulted the girl, but she and her parents refused
medical evaluations for rape. The family received a referral to
see Janet Matthews, a clinical psychologist specializing in
adolescent trauma. During their initial meeting with Dr.
Matthews, the parents asked the psychologist not to discuss any
sexual aspects of the assault with their daughter but to treat the
psychological trauma from the assault in general.
They told the psychologist that admitting a rape had taken place
would cast a stigma on their daughter and make her ineligible to
be married to men in their closely knit ethnic community. When
asked in private, the girl also requested that sexual issues not be
discussed for the same reason.
Ethical Dilemma
Dr. Matthews does not know if she should agree to the parents’
and child’s request.
Suggested Readings
American Psychological Association. (2003). Guidelines on
multicultural education, training,
research, practice, and organizational change for psychologists.
American Psychologist,
58, 377–402.
American Psychological Association. (2007b). Guidelines for
psychological practice with
girls and women. American Psychologist, 62, 949–979.
Arredondo, P., & Toporek, R. (2004). Multicultural counseling
competencies = ethical
practice. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 26(1), 44–55.
Gallardo, M. E., Johnson, J., Parham, T. A., & Carter, J. A.
(2009). Ethics and multiculturalism:

6. Advancing cultural and clinical responsiveness. Professional
Psychology: Research and
Practice, 40, 425-435.
Vasquez, M. (2012). Social justice and civic virtue. In S.
Knapp, M. Gottlieb, M. Handelsman,
& L. VandeCreek (Eds.), Handbook of ethics in psychology
(Vol. 1, pp. 75–98).
Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.