&Quot;Throughout My Detainment In The Solitary Cells, There

"Throughout My Detainment In The Solitary Cells, There
"Throughout my detainment in the solitary cells, there was an interrogation every two or three days,
During these interrogations, we were subjected to many psychological and physical torture methods.
One of these methods was that you are kept naked, handcuffed, [a] hood [is put] on your head, then
they would bring a big dog. You hear the panting and barking of the dog very close to your face, (
Hassan)." An innocent Al Jazeera journalist named, Salah Hassan, was imprisoned and tortured at
Abu Ghraib, a central prison used by U.S federal agencies. Innocent refugees like Hassan
experienced extreme abuse techniques by U.S officials such as the of sleep deprivation, forced
"feeding", exams with abuse, standing for several hours on sore limbs, ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
"The bottom line is [that] these techniques have hurt our image around the world Director of
National Intelligence Dennis Blair said that, "the damage they have done to our interests far
outweighed whatever benefit they gave us, and they are not essential to our national security,
(Blair)." Furthermore, enhanced interrogation is useless because it does not pressure a detainee to
speak the truth, but instead withholds precise and credible information from U.S federal agencies. In
fact, according to 25 former interrogators and intelligence professionals from the U.S military say
that, " the application of psychological, emotional, and physical pressure can force a victim of
torture to say anything just to end the painful experience. Neuroscience professor, shane O'mara
says that" abusive interrogation techniques can " compromise memory, mood, and eliciting accurate
information, (O'mara)." Also, "The 1992 U.S. Army Interrogation Field Manual 34–52 states:
"Experience indicates that the use of prohibited techniques is not necessary to gain the cooperation
of interrogation sources, ( Interrogation Field Manual)." Use of torture and other illegal methods is a
poor technique that yields unreliable results, may damage subsequent collection efforts, and can
induce the source to say whatever he thinks the interrogator wants to hear, (CCR Justice)."
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Torture and America
Torture and America
Eric Lindsey
Kaplan University
Torture and America
As the country goes through its tenth year of the war on terror one can look back and see some of
the policy differences that has plagued this country when, as a nation, our young men are sent to
war. Everything, in this author's view needs to be on the table, and transparent. Of course, troops
strength, strategy, and general war plans should be kept from the enemy, the need of informing our
own people has been a tight rope that is not easy to balance on for any one person. This was
especially true of the "enhanced interrogations" used by the Bush administration at the beginning of
the War on Terror. What this paper plans to do is to explain the four greatest ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Memos from the Department of Defense called for the implementation of enhanced interrogation
techniques to begin immediately and to be sure "these are carried out", these were in accordance
with the White House. All of President Bush's closest cabinet members and national security
advisers signed off on enhanced interrogation, believing that under the legal research conducted the
techniques satisfied the legal standard as not being torture, (Bartz, 2006) Another player in this
global debate of enhanced interrogation is the United Nations itself. In May of 2005, the UN issued
an 11 page panel report on the adhearance of the United States to the anti–torture treaty. In the
report the UN said that the United States should stop the process of enhanced interrogation saying
that it was "nothing more than torture". The US should stop its interrogations of civilians in Iraq and
Afghanistan by military and civilian staff and prosecute any staff found to have used any of the
techniques specific to the enhanced interrogation. The UN report stopped short of admonishing the
United States as the US "has a very good record on human rights" , (19 May 2006) Torture was
banned by the UN in 1948, in its Universal Declaration of Human Rights of which not only is

Kant Against Torture
Part I:
1.
Kant's seventh proposition within his "Idea for a United History" that sees its as necessary for states
working together before NGO's or other political organizations such as the UN can be set up and
successfully established. His desire to set into motion the idea of perpetual peace should be the
result not the driving force behind nations working together.
2.
a) ECHR: European Convention on Human Rights
treaty that protects human rights and freedom in Europe drafted in mid 20th century
b) CAT: United Nations Convention against Torture
treaty by the UN that prevents use of torture against people world wide
c) ICESCR: International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
treaty that holds countries responsible ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The move is based on the notion that the current Syrian president, Bashar Al Assad, has waged a
war on his own people who oppose him. The Syrian conflict has killed more than 100,000 Syrians
and has forced millions to go abroad. Despite these harrowing facts, before the United States and its
allies consider an intervention into the country, a number of details have to be examined deeply and
using numerous schools of thoughts and perspectives. There is a lot at state in the country and one
cannot afford to overlook in calculating the decision to intervene. In order to do so, one must first
consider the dimensions of the ethical dilemma faced by the West in deciding what actions to take
against ISIS. The self–proclaimed Islamic State occupies around 30% of Syria and rules according
to harsh Islamic law and commits mass murders and horrendous human rights violations. The
jihadist organization claims that its acts of terror against foreigners are retribution for the American
drone–oriented bombings of ISIS in Syria. The moral philosophy, ethical thinking and deontological
rights of Syrians have to play a role in whether the United States intervenes or not. What should be
done, if anything, about the impeding human rights catastrophe that has resulted from the Syrian
conflict? What does the mainstream debate about Syria and the

Guantanamo Bay and Human Rights Violations by the United...
Introduction Guantanamo Bay, Cuba is originally a naval base that was once used to house detention
facilities for Haitian and Cuban refugees fleeing to the United States. It was also used as a refueling
station for Navy ships. It was then converted into a high level detention facility to house enemy
troops captured in the War on Terror campaign by Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfield. It has
three main camps that house the prisoners. These prisoners of war were later referred to as enemy
combatants. They were excluded from the prisoner of war statutes of the Geneva Convention
because of their involvement in a foreign terrorist organization and therefore earning themselves the
title of terrorists. The Guantanamo Bay Detention Center served as the perfect location to send these
terrorists. It allowed the United States to strip them of any due process or protection that is provided
by US law. Due to its location, being in foreign territory they are only subjected to military law.
They are close enough for them to be monitored without interference of intentional agencies or
international oversight. Furthermore, the US Government is holding these men without due process
because they are deemed too dangerous to be released into the public because of their associations
with terrorist organizations and possession of valuable information relating to National Security
such as location of key members of a terrorist groups, whereabouts. However, the United States
cannot release those

The Battle Against The War On Terrorism
What Now? An analysis of the responses to the Senate Report on CIA Interrogation
The fight against the "war on terrorism" has initiated a debate in the United States over the use of
torture and advanced interrogation techniques to extract information needed to protect the safety of
its citizens. In lieu of the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks, government officials believed that using extensive
force against suspected is justified, especially if such force results in the prevention of future
planned attacks. Others reject torture and the methods used by the government agencies, especially
the CIA, as both "unreliable and an affront to legal and civilized norms of behavior." In December
of 2014, The Senate Intelligence Committee Report on CIA torture, drafted by the bipartisan United
States Select Committee on Intelligence, brought light to the controversy by unearthing the methods
and techniques used to interrogate detainees, prisoners of war, and suspected terrorists. The findings
have ignited strong opposition and outcry among the citizens, critics of the government, and foreign
nations. The aftermath of this report have prompted two important questions: Should the CIA be
held responsible for its actions and face investigations, prosecution, and full legal action or should
the CIA have the ability to act and determine policies they seem fit to protect the U.S. from any
threats and outside forces?
Torture is defined by the United Nations Convention Against Torture as "any act by

Should the United States Use Torture to Gather Information
I. Introduction The United States citizens have been wrestling with the question of, whether their
government intelligence agencies should be prohibited from using torture to gather information.
According to Michael Ignatieff, this is the hardest case of what he describes as 'lesser evil ethics'–a
political ethics predicated on the idea that in emergencies leaders must choose between different
evils Before the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, torture was viewed by most American's as
only actions that brutal dictators would employ on their citizens, to keep order within their country.
However, this all changed when in May 2004, The New Yorker released photographs from the Abu
Ghraib prison in Iraq. The disturbing pictures were released on the internet showing bodies of naked
Iraqis piled onto each other, others showed Iraqis being tortured and humiliated. There was a huge
up roar, which caused the President at the time George W. Bush to publicly apologize, and threaten
the job of Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. Soon after, the CIA Conformed the use of
waterboarding on three Al–Qaida suspects in 2002 and 2003, which further annihilated the topic.
Since these reports, torture has been in the forefront of national politics, and the public opinion has
been struggling to commit on whether torture is right or wrong. In a study done by the Department
of Phycology at the University of Montana, study claims that "people's views of torture are often
negative. However,

Essay On Torture In America
This research paper talks about the controversy of torture in America. Torture is defined as a
punishment of severe and intentional pain, either mentally or physically, inflicted on a person,
particularly to receive information from him or her ("Defining Torture"). Starting around 530 A.D.,
the Romans started using torture as a tactic to get statements from people that they claimed they
could not get any other way. For the same reason, the French and Italians adopted using torture
around the twelfth–century; however, they began to inflict torture on people because their law
system required that they must have a confession from the suspect or witnesses in order to punish
the person (Green). America adopted similar practices such as the French and Italians did, but the
United States government claims that torture has only been used as a way to keep America safe
from ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Their main defense is that using torture as a way of interrogation helps the government gain quick
access to pertinent information that could potentially save lives or stop future attacks in general.
They believe that the Constitution does not give rights to foreign terrorists and torturing foreigners
is no different, but is actually better than the torture that other nations inflict on American people,
especially prisoners of war. On the other hand, the liberals believe that torture is ethically wrong as
it deprives the rights given to non–citizens under the 14th amendment. Another reason is because
America signed UNCAT, so continuing to torture people goes against the American's word. The
liberals look at torture as ineffective and cannot produce reliable, consistent results. Stopping torture
altogether will prove that the United States is better than terrorists without seeking to torture as a
way of finding results and will make the U.S. a more reliable nation for committing to their

The Effects Of Torture On Human Rights Violations
Although the use of torture has been around since the first century, most Americans did not debate
on the controversial topic until after the Abu Ghraib incident surfaced in April 2004. The Baghdad
Central Prison, formerly known as Abu Ghraib prison was a complex west of Baghdad. During the
war in Iraq, US armed forces committed a number of human rights violations, including "pouring
phosphorus liquid on detainees, pouring cold water on naked detainees, beating detainees" (Hersh)
and committing other psychological, physical, and sexual abuses. At the Abu Ghraib prison, military
officials abused detainees for several reasons or without providing a reason. Enhanced interrogation
techniques are sometimes seen as necessary to extract information, punish detainees, and instill fear;
however, occasionally torture is used without providing a reason. Proponents of torture insist its
legitimacy in special circumstances, especially when handling international terrorists. Opponents of
torture believe these human rights violations are medieval and inhumane. Torture is illegal in the
United States and no United States agency can legally engage in torture abroad. No country should
engage in enhanced interrogation techniques because the methods are a violation of ethical
principles, a violation of international law, a form of cruel and unusual punishment, ineffective in
combating terrorism, and immoral, dehumanizing acts related to a lack of moral integrity.
First of all, the definition

Torture : Should It Ever Be Tolerated?
Torture: Should It Ever Be Tolerated?
Can torture be justified? Is it lawful to torture someone? And if yes, under what conditions? The
subject of torture has been a controversial debate among many nations mainly the United States.
One can agree that torture is wrong and should never be tolerated however others disagree. This
subject takes us back to September 11, 2001 when the United States encountered al Qaeda attacks.
Those in favor of torture mention its effectiveness in certain circumstances for instance some
drafted memos about torture by the Deputy Assistant Attorney General back in 2002. The memos
were presented to President George W. Bush after being signed by the Assistant Attorney General.
The CIA as well as the Department of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The united states have a couple of times captured the suspected terrorists and their subjection to
interrogation including torture. The C.I.A has also detained suspects secretly and subjected them to
inhuman treatment thus torture so that they could extract information.
The authorization of torture is supported because of the claim of the prevention of a future attack on
the U.S. The authorities therefore agree that the information gathered would be important to prevent
attacks that would have otherwise killed thousands of citizens. This argument does not justify the
use of torture as it may be either morally or politically based. Thus, the logic does not necessitate
the legalization of torture.
Some cases have proved that torture has prevented attacks; we can also contest these arguments. My
review on Matthew Alexander's book, How to Break a Terrorist: The US Interrogators Who Used
Brains, Not Brutality, to Take Down the Deadliest Man in Iraq, explains how the author proves the
effectiveness of conviction rather than coercion. Matthew Alexander incorporates individual
examples to direct his team on the effectiveness of convincing their sources thus their results were
notable in the U.S. air attack against the leader of Al–Qaeda, Abu Musab al–Zarqawi. Matthew
Alexander was the leader of the team and at that time, the military was under the administration of
George W. Bush.
Matthew Alexander additionally wrote his second book, Kill or Capture, to explain the

The Pros And Cons Of Extradition
Extradition is the transfer of an accused from one state or country to another state or country that
seeks to place the accused on trial. In legal term extradition can be defined as the legal surrender of
a fugitive to the jurisdiction of another state, country, or government for trial. Extradition between
nations is regulated by extradition laws or diplomatic treaties between the country where the
accused is present. Not all the countries have extradition treaties. The united states have entered into
extradition treaties with many countries in Europe and Latin America and few countries in Asia and
Africa. Extradition treaty is necessary because once a person leaves the border of a country the laws
of that country cease to apply to them and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Many of the extradition treaties which has been signed by the U.S requires that the offense should
be a crime in the U.S as well as the country making the request. In U.S requests for extradition are
seen by the state department and the justice department. The limitations to extradition are as
follows:–
–Not all the nations will extradite their citizens to another country for prosecution like France and
Israel.
–There are countries which refuses to extradite to the U.S if the death penalty will be imposed.
There are treaties which have the provisions that prevent extradition if the person has already been
convicted oe acquitted for the crime.
The European Convention on Extradition was signed on December 13th 1957. The European
Convention on Extradition convention is a multilateral extradition treaty. Extradition can only be
granted with respect to certain crimes. France, Japan, Ukraine, China, Belarus are the countries
which do not have its citizens extradited.
The Extradition Clause or Interstate Rendition Clause of the United States Constitution refers to the
Article 4, Section 2, Clause 2, which provides for the extradition of a criminal back to the state
where he/she has committed a

The Methods and Techniques of Judge Dee from Celebrated...
Judge Dee is a magistrate for the Chinese Province of Ching–Ping and he used many methods and
techniques to solve his cases. He also had significant influence on the society. Judge Dee mainly
utilized two methods to solve his cases, and they were using disguises and torture. He first used
disguises in the case "The Double Murder at Dawn" to try to find any suspicious man or women that
might look like he or she has been in a conflict instead; he finds the beginnings of the second case
"The Strange Corpse." This is always a simple way to get information because if he appeared as a
magistrate, people will be unwilling to dispense the information needed. So if he dresses up like a
doctor like he did at the beginning, people would be willing to ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Judge Dee was considered the "Father and Mother Official." Magistrates function as a judge, jury,
prosecutor, and detective. He was the highest power in his district and was in charge of many things.
He was in charge of the town, land administration, the tribunal, the bureau for the collection of
taxes, the register office, and the public order in the district. Magistrates had to have great moral
strength, intellectual power, and refined literati also trained on Chinese letter and arts. Without any
of these skills, the magistrate would have failed his job. He would have barely gained any support
since these skills were signs of a good leader. The Magistrates were almost miniature monarchs of
their own lands. Even though whatever they say is not law, they are able to convict and torture
people until they listen. Judge Dee took everything under his control form the detective work to
sentences. He used lieutenants and constables to help out, but most work was done single–handedly.
No one else I the district has more power than him. A few magistrates in the book even had their
own private army for example; the magistrate in Turnip Pass had a garrison to protect the area from
criminals. Magistrates are supposed to be truth–seeking men. Judge Dee is obviously truth seeking
because he tries to see why the husband died in "The Strange Corpse" even though no one filed a
complaint, he did this for righteousness, which is looked for in

Ethical Use Of Torture Essay
The thin line between humanity and safety has been blurred. The world stood in shock on
September 11th 2001 when a terrorist group known as al–Qaeda hijacked four airliners and
successfully flew two of them into the World Trade Centers in New York and one into the Pentagon.
These atrocities resulted in the death of more than two thousand and seven hundred victims,
including citizens from over eighty nations (9/11 Report). The magnitude of these attacks was
unprecedented in the history transnational warfare and elicited security implications worldwide.
Only a few hours after the attack, American President George W. Bush declared a United States led
war on terror in order to the security and life of citizens from future terrorist attacks. The war on
terror brought a novel form of combat, posed new issues to the United States and the international
community, and lead to the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For instance, when British officers interrogated a group of terrorist suspects, they confessed while
being tortured and said they had got their training from al–Qaeda soldiers in Afghanistan, when in
actuality, they were taught in the United Kingdom (Bellamy). In order for an interrogation to be
successful the essential information must be elicited within the first few hours of the terrorists' arrest
or else the terrorist group will alter their plans once they find out one of their own has been arrested,
subsequently the information given by the captured terrorist becomes worthless. Also, the abuse of
human rights through torture techniques will add further hate–sentiment between the United States
and the Islamic people

In this paper I will argue that torturing a person is...
In this paper I will argue that torturing a person is never a best way to bring about a much greater
good except in extreme emergency situations. I will also argue that he degree of torture should vary
in these extreme emergency situations and the torturer should be able to justify why did he torture
the person. I will elaborate on torture and why I believe it is never the best way to bring about a
greater good after a very brief description of what torture is and under what circumstances people
ought to be tortured. Torture is basically inflecting unbearable pain in a person in order to break
his/her will to obtain certain information. Most commonly torture is used on people who are
considered as a threat to the nation or simply who defy ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
I believe torture is only morally permissible in extreme emergency situations. By extreme
emergency situations I mean when there is a risk that hundreds of people will be killed if the victim
does not provide certain information. In the ticking time bomb case, interrogators have tried all the
acceptable methods to get the code to disarm the bomb and have failed to do so and hence it is
morally permissible to torture the person to get the code otherwise we will be putting the lives of
millions of people at risks. Also, some cases where torture would be morally permissible are where
the torturer is hundred percent sure that the victim is the perpetrator and has significant information
to bring about greater good. This victim can be a kidnapper, a bomber, a terrorist or even a secret
service agent who is selling confidential information. I also believe that while torturing someone the
degree of torture should not be too high and it should be in the knowledge of highest law authority.
A medical practitioner should also be present while torturing a victim so that there should be no risk
to the life of the perpetrator. As Henry Shue said that "An act of torture ought to remain illegal" and
anyone has to justify in order defending himself/herself legally (Shue). I strongly believe that under
any circumstance torture should not be legalized whether it is for

Enhanced Interrogation Methods
People are naturally independent thinkers and have opposing opinions that differ from other people's
opinions. The controversial topic of torture is one such subject in which people have differing views
on. Torture, also known as enhanced interrogation or stress and duress techniques, is defined by the
United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhumane, or Degrading Treatment or
Punishment as "any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is
intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him or a third person
information... when such pain or suffering is inflicted by or at the instigation of or with the consent
or acquiescence of a public official or other person acting in an ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Supporters of the legalization say that the interrogations are justified because enhanced
interrogations are used to prevent future killings by obtaining important information on terrorist
plots (Cheney). Henry Mark claims that torture in defense of self is justified and isn't immoral.
Additionally, the people that are under enhanced interrogations are not innocent nor are they victims
(Cheney). Enhanced interrogations are justified because it is for the safety of the people and those
subject under the interrogations are not innocent victims (Cheney). Hence, such interrogation
methods are justified. In addition to that, the necessity of enhanced interrogations is expressed by
the importance of saving lives. More precisely, enhanced interrogation methods have saved lives
and resulted in the foiling of enemy plans, along with diversions of terrorist plots, though memos of
diverted terrorist plots have not been released (Cheney).Cheney argues that the only way to get
specific information is by using enhanced interrogation methods. Cheney says that "the key to any
strategy is accurate intelligence, and skilled professionals to get that information in time to use it".
Therefore, the use of enhanced interrogation techniques is necessary because it saves lives (Mark).
Thus, enhanced interrogation methods are necessary in order to protect citizens against enemy
forces. Therefore,

Torture Throughout History
he act of torture throughout history . The devices that was used in slow, painful, and most of the
time did not kill them they died because infection set in and got in the blood stream. The state made
the churches do most of the torture because they didn't want the state to look like they was doing
bad. The Norman French drafted the art of torture of the Anglo–saxons. The Anglo–Saxons used the
layers of society (top to bottom king, church, knights, and the peasants) put only the king above the
church. The king did not want to look bad , So he had the church perform the torture. To cover it up
they made it out to look like it was god word to have them pay back for what crime they did. Not all
the time was it fair most of the time the govern ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Gelatin or its smaller brother the Halifax is what you now see in movies a lot. Unlike the
movies most of the time it was not a clean cut on the first time, most of the time it took more than
one try to completely cut the head off. It would hit the back of the neck and bounce off. They would
do this till the head was completely off. To me the most interesting way to torture someone was with
animals this was used with rats and houses most commonly. The rat would be placed into a metal
bucket and the bucket would slowly be heated up till the rat had no way out. The rat would start to
eat though the accused body to get away from the heat . the person would be keep alive till the rat
eat all the way through. The horses would be tied to both the arms and legs or just a arm and the leg.
The torturer would eater slowly pull apart the accused or would let the horse take off running. They
did not just use branding on the houses and cattle. They used this with a every hot or a very cold
pease of iron that was words or a symbol to mark you a lot of the time this was used on their slaves
to identify then if they ever ran away. This was draft down the the americas, mostly the south by
rich slave owners. They sometimes they would cut a small hole to the person's gut and cut their
intestines out. Then tie them to a rod and twist the rod and slowly pull the intestines out of the body.
Torser is still on the books in many places around the

Argumentative Essay On Waterboarding
Public revelations over the past few years regarding the recent waterboarding of prisoners of war,
detainees and enemy combatants by the United States government has garnered much attention and
debate. Some of main topics in this on–going debate include: Is waterboarding torture? Is it legal? Is
it moral? What are the repercussions and possible reciprocal action of our enemies because of this
waterboarding? This paper does not provide an argument for or against water boarding in and of
itself but lays out a defense for the legality of waterboarding as was used against Prisoners of War
and detainees from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. This defense is outlined in three phases:
defining and describing water boarding; providing an ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Water is then applied to the cloth ...[a]s this is done, the cloth is lowered until it covers the nose and
mouth. Once the cloth is saturated and completely covers the nose and mouth, air flow is slightly
restricted for 20 to 40 seconds due to the presence of the cloth, stimulat[ing] increased effort to
breathe. This effort plus the cloth produces the perception of "suffocation and incipient panic," i.e.
the perception of drowning ... This sensation of drowning is immediately relieved by the removal of
the cloth. The procedure may then be repeated." 20 (emergency presidential power pg 207) Using
this definition and procedural descriptions above the next step in determining the legality of water
boarding is to define "legal". The Oxford English Dictionary defines legal as "In Law: The system
of rules which a particular country or community recognizes as regulating the actions of its
members and which it may enforce by the imposition of penalties. 2) According to or concerned
with the laws of a country. 3) Permitted by law." https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/legal
(2017, Oxford University Press). The U.S. Government, specifically the CIA, acknowledged using
water boarding in 2003 and 2004. The Central

Essay about How Should Prisoners of War be Treated?
How Should Prisoners of War be Treated?
In an op–ed piece for the New York Times, entitled "George W. to George W.," Thomas Friedman
writes about the treatment of prisoners in United States custody being held in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Friedman writes in his "George W." piece that "We killed 26 of our prisoners of war. In 18 cases,
people have been recommended for prosecution or action by their supervising agencies, and eight
other cases are still under investigation."
Friedman goes on to write that the United States has been very lax when it comes to punishing those
United States officials and officers in charge during the time that prisoners of war have been
tortured and killed. Friedman calls for President Bush and the United ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
One needs look no further than the Abu Ghraib prison scandal. The war in Iraq today has many
controversial events happenings in the treatment of the prisoners on both sides. Many people know
about the Abu Ghraib prison scandal, and the mistreatment of prisoners. Horrible photos of abused
Iraqi prisoners spread through the news all over the world.
One figure of prisoner of war captures in Iraq by the US and UK forces are more than 5,300, and
many still being captured today (Kelley). The treatment of these prisoners should follow strict
guidelines of the proper treatment of the prison war. Many problems have occurred with the
mistreatment of prisoners, especially in the wake of the Abu Ghraib prison scandal. Here is one
account: "According to the U.S. Army, one Iraqi prisoner was told to stand on a box with his head
covered, wires attached to his hands. He was told that if he fell off the box, he would be
electrocuted." (Abuse of Iraqi POWs by GIs Probed).
"Breaking chemical lights and pouring the phosphoric liquid on detainees; pouring cold water on
naked detainees; beating detainees with a broom handle and a chair; threatening male detainees with
rape; allowing a military police guard to stitch the wound of a detainee who was injured after being
slammed against the wall in his cell; sodomizing a detainee with a chemical light and perhaps a
broom stick, and using military working dogs to frighten and intimidate detainees with threats of
attack, and in one instance

Un Convention Against Torture And Part II Of The 1949...
Sponsor: France Committee: 6th Legal Topic: Enhanced Interrogation The General Assembly,
Recognizing the inhumane use of both physical and psychological torture and a means of enhanced
interrogation, Believing that mildly enhanced interrogation is an effective means of convicting
criminals only if it is used in a humane way, Bearing in mind that every suspect of a crime is
innocent until proven guilty, Declaring that no criminal case is ever justified in utilizing torture as a
form of enhanced interrogation, Emphasizing the fact that enhanced interrogation escalates to
torture due to a lack of monitoring in detainment centers, Taking into account the undistinguished
threshold between enhanced interrogation and torture, In agreement ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Emphasizes the need for monitoring within detainment facilities: a. carried out by surveillance
cameras, b. ensured by regular UN sponsored inspections; 5. Directs an impartial investigation of a
detainment center: a. within thirty days of a report of possible torture, b. carried out by INTERPOL;
6. Requests the use of a team of psychologists to determine the interrogation techniques that cause
serious physical or psychological harm: a. to maintain the jurisdiction of international law as new
techniques develop, b. so that the use of these techniques may warrant an investigation, c. to allow
the continuation of humane, yet effective forms of enhanced interrogation; 7. Enforces regulated
training and monitoring with the use of: a. monetary incentives, b. potential economic sanctions for
the refusal to cooperate; 8. Designates an anonymous tipping system to: a. collect inside knowledge
of detainment centers worldwide, b. give former detainees and officers an opportunity to report the
offenses of these centers without revealing their identity; 9. Encourages the collaboration of member
states in order to standardize detainment centers worldwide through: a. a biannual conference for the
purpose of discussing the regulation of detainment centers, b. communication between nations for
the process of organizing trials and extraditions. Sponsor: France Committee: 6th Legal Topic:
International

Essay on The Morality of Torture
The Morality of Torture
The moral issue of torture is one that has come under scrutiny by many national and international
organizations as of late. To talk about torture one must really understand what torture is. As taken
from Dictionary.com "1.a. Infliction or severe physical pain as a means of punishment or coercion.
b. An instrument or a method for inflicting such pain. 2. Excruciating physical or mental pain;
agony. 3. Something causing severe pain or anguish." This is just the literal meaning of the word but
doesn't entail the great horror that usually accompanies torture. As stated in the "Ticking Bomb"
example given on the instruction sheets, "The interrogation won't be pretty, and the prisoner may
never recover. Shall we do ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Mistreatment of people creates resentment and anger in the individual and his family, friends and
community, and therefore any government–sanctioned torture here is certain to generate more
hateful opponents of the US. The official use of torture by the President or another governing body
in the U.S. (as given as a replacement on the instruction sheet for this paper) would nullify US
efforts against torture abroad and undermine U.S. human rights policy. It also would signal to other
governments that when faced with a special situation, any behavior is acceptable. It has been proven
by organizations such as Human Rights Watch, United States Institute of Peace and The Crimes of
War Project that legitimizing torture, even on a small scale, or any form of cruel treatment brings the
principles and ethics that society is based on down. Especially if the U.S. uses it because to the rest
of the world we are looked up to as the most law–biding nation, yet we bend the rules to fit each
circumstance and look for the loop holes which brings further scrutiny on specific things such as; a
POW not being a terrorist detainee and are somehow outside the realm of human rights laws against
torture. Not only can torture be unproductive it can also work totally against a nation that uses it.
For instance if the U.S. didn't enforce the universally recognized right to not be tortured it

Is Torture Is Acceptable?
Is torture acceptable? Torture is a way that pain and suffering is felt, like mental or physical pain, so
an action is implied on a person in order to get information about something for being suspected or
someone who have information which may be useful in order to save others life or anything else
that might be important to get the information about it. Moreover, torture might be acceptable and
might not be in most of the world but according to UN's reporters in the security council that torture
is still global since 102 countries still support torturing like Egypt, china, Korea and also most
African countries (The print edition: International, 2007) .Therefore, torture is acceptable because it
can decrease terrorism, know the truth, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
On the other hand, the use of modern technologies and the high transfer between different agencies
all over the universe with high speed and accuracy so these techniques decrease the level of having
inaccurate information and evidence and also decrease the risk of arresting a wrong person.
Furthermore many people agree that torture is acceptable since it can save others life. Supporting
that idea and according to (Dershowitz),torture should be used as a last hope in order to help others
innocent people lives and it should be done at public, with liability, and the president should
approve on it .Furthermore, Torture is acceptable if the evidence leads that it is the only way in
order to save good pure people ,than torture in this case is justified and acceptable since it will help
others and this is the right thing that the government could do in order to save innocent person and
its better than allowing the offender to keep the information (Bagaric, 2005) . Finally, torture can
save hundreds of innocent people whose lives is in danger because of people who have information
and evidence about something that going to happen and they won't talk unless they are tortured

Human Torture Should Not be Continued Essay
The United Nations defines torture as any act by which severe physical or mental pain or suffering
is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining information or a confession, or
punishing a person for an act that he is suspected of having committed. Torture also includes
intimidating or coercing a person for any reason based on discrimination of any kind when a person
acting in an official capacity inflicts pain or suffering (Convention Against Torture para. 2).
Although some people believe that torture is acceptable, in reality it is neither an acceptable nor a
reliable method for obtaining information and should not be continued. In his article, When Is
Torture Legal, Josh Clark discusses the convention on ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Allegedly, the outsourcing of terror suspects to countries such as Jordan, Egypt, Morocco and Syria,
countries that engage in torture, also occurred. In addition, the International Committee of the Red
Cross reported on methods of physical and psychological coercion used to extract information from
prisoners in Iraq. These methods include beatings with hard objects, slapping, punching, kicking,
prolonged exposure to the sun, and parading detainees naked, sometimes with women's underwear
on their heads. In some cases, threats were issued against the detainees' families (Ramsey 105). Acts
such as these are what determined the necessity of the 1984 convention prohibiting torture, and yet
the abuse continues. Isabel Kershner and Mark Landler shed light on one of the more notorious
instances of torture in their article "Abuses at Abu Ghraib." The event took place in 2004 in the Abu
Ghraib prison in Iraq, where a series of photographs surfaced, depicting United States soldiers
abusing and humiliating Iraqi prisoners. The photos show naked prisoners subjected to sexual
humiliation by American women. The United States military recommended disciplinary action
against several officers, and brought criminal charges against six members of an Army Reserve unit
accused of torturing the prisoners at Abu Ghraib (Kershner and Landler para. 2–3). These
photographs may not have depicted typical treatment of Iraqi prisoners; however, they

The Role Of Custodial Torture And Its Removal Of Body...
Mutilating body parts, traumatic removal of body parts Amputation of digits and limbs, removal of
organs Asphyxiations: drowning, smothering, choking, chemicals Chemical exposures in wounds,
body cavities Attacks by animals, dental torture Exhaustion, forced labour, starvation Psychological
Torture Threatening to harm or kill the victim or the victim 's relatives Forced witnessing or hearing
the torture of others Mock execution, forced to harm others Denigration and humiliations, threats of
attacks by animals Violations of taboos, violation of religion INTERNATIONAL COMMITMENT
Custodial Torture has been the concern of international community as the problem is universal and
challenge is almost global. The US Supreme Court in case of Munn vs. People of Illinois observed
that life is not merely an animal existence. The soul behind the bar cannot be denied the same
because such person does not cease to be a human being. Just being in prison does not deprive them
from their fundamental rights. International law prohibits torture and other forms of inhuman and
degrading treatment, which cannot be accepted under any circumstances. One of the earliest
measures was taken by the United Nations to abolish corporal punishment in colonial territories in
1949. United Nations Standards The United Nations has a developed a number of standards related
to the prevention of torture, including: Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners
Basic Principles

Torture : A Long And Detailed History
Water boarding, removal of limbs, drilling holes into the body, electric shock, and crucifixion. All of
these are methods of a subject called torture, or the act of which one inflicts physical or
psychological pain for purpose of degrading, intimidating, controlling, or getting information
("Torture"). Throughout history, these have all been reasons for torturing people; however, whether
or not torture should still be allowed is a topic of debate. There is a long and detailed history of
torture, along with numerous reasons people are tortured today, and survivors face a wide variety of
mental and physical effects.
The history of torture goes all the way back to the days from the Bible. An example would be the
crucifixion of Jesus. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For example, many jews were brought to concentration camps during World War Two. There, they
were starved, beaten, not given proper living conditions, and then either gassed or burned. In other
cases, prisoners of war who get captured get tortured for information about their plans or tactics.
Throughout later parts of the twentieth century, and early parts of the twenty first century, torture
has continued secretly for many reasons and by many different groups. Several efforts were made to
try and put a permanent end to torture. In the early twenty first century, OPCAT (Optional Protocol
to the Convention Against Torture) started a subcommittee on prevention, a body that had the right
and obligation to visit states without further consent of a state party to the protocol. In Europe, the
government developed a rule stating that all countries have to be inspected, and each state party
must establish its own independent national viewing mechanisms.The legal international prohibition
of torture became absolute and unambiguous. However completely getting rid of torture was nearly
impossible. Many places wanted to see offenders punished and suffer no matter the means.
September 11ths made the problem much worse when the terrorists attacked the twin towers. Many
journalists wanted to revisit the absolute ban on torture or inhumane treatment as discussed in
previous legal issues after it was

Torture Is It Ever Permissible?
Running Head: IS IT EVER PERMISSIBLE TO TORTURE SOMEONE 1 Is it ever permissible to
torture a person Patricia Brawn PHI 103: Informal Logic Elisabeth Nicholes January 30, 2017
Running Head: IS IT EVER PERMISSIBLE TO TORTURE SOMEONE 2 Torture is considered to
be a cruel and degrading act of causing severe pain either mentally or physically to another human
being by using force to get them to confess information they may have related to a crime or
wrongful act. There are many other effect ways to get information that can be les harmful to the
victim. Torture is seen as an inhumane ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Torture can be morally justifiable when torturing a wrongdoer would prevent them from seriously
hurting innocent people for the purpose of gathering information that my not necessarily be the
truth. Those arguing against the use of torture expressed the following concerns: that torture is
sometimes endorsed as a punishment rather than as a means of extracting information (Carlsmith &
Sood,2009), that the wrong people are tortured more often than the right people (Bellamy,2006), and
that there are insufﬁcient safeguards in the current system to prevent these misapplications from
occurring. Few people agree that torturing innocent people who do not have any relevant
information is morally right. This analysis assumes that there is a reasonable probability that the to–
be–tortured person has information that, if acquired by the torturer, could potentially prevent some
signiﬁcant harm from coming to others. For this assignment I will use the hypothetical scenario
commonly known as "the ticking bomb dilemma" and is invariably invoked whenever the ethics of
torture are debated (Greenberg,2006). In this dilemma the agent believes to have a terrorist in
custody that is believed to possess critical knowledge of a pending terrorist attack or some other
horrific event that will soon cause many innocent people (civilians, children), to be harmed and
even killed. She believes that if she can acquire information she will be able to

Torture Or Not To Torture Essay
To Torture or Not to Torture
After World War II, countries put in the Geneva Conventions that governed the treatment of wartime
prisoners and civilians in occupied territories because of the catastrophic and inhumane conduct that
was perpetrated by the Germans, Japanese, and Italians (Center for Constitution Rights, 2006).
Although there have been some amendments, for the most part, this agreement has remained in
place until the onset of terrorist attacks. When the United States was attacked on its own soil in
2001 by al Qaeda, Americans became engaged in a different kind of war, a war against individuals
without country borders, and it was coined the war on terrorism. With this in mind, officials
determined that the rules of the Geneva Conventions did not apply, and interrogation techniques that
utilized physical and psychological torture were appropriate. This unilateral decision to disregard
common protocols was based on the consequentialism view; tormenting enemies is justified if lives
can be saved. Torturous acts were acceptable, if captives divulged pertinent information. While the
security of any country is imperative, torture under any circumstance is wrong, even if it is practical
and the results are favorable. Intentionally tormenting or causing harm for any reason is inherently a
depraved ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
While the war on terrorism has required different strategies that were not utilized in other wars, the
use of torture should not be included as new approach. The Geneva Conventions established
protocols that ensured ethical treatment of prisoners because of the atrocities that happened in World
War II. That being said, prisoners should be treated with respect, even if they are terrorists. Arthur
Holmes (2007) states that, "It is an overall moral principle, all–inclusive and exceptionless, that
should govern all of our actions"(p.54). Torture is never

Pros And Cons Of Legalizing Torture
Torture is ban by most international laws but yet many societies continue with practice including
many Democracies. The United Nation has a ban on torture with no exception under any
circumstances. Article 2 of United Nations convention against torture states that no exceptionable
circumstance can justify torture. Article gives meaning of what it considers to be torture. The
meaning of torture given by United Nations is any act by which severe pain or suffering whether
physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purpose as obtaining from him or a
third party information or confession, punishing him for an act he or a third person has committed,
or is suspected of committing, or intimidating or coercing him or a third person, or ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
A legal mechanism like the search warrant that approves the performances of none lethal
interrogative on a person. But no authority can approve such for what is illegal so torture would
have to be legalized for the torture warrant. Dershowitz argues that torture should be legally
permitted, but he still thinks that it is wrong and absolutely so. Torture by many is consider to be
morally wrong and it should be illegal. The moral absolutisms view that one should never kill
another person under any circumstance no matter what can be achieved by doing so or what evil
could be averted by doing so. This prohibition is not a material claim in the actual world killing
another person is morally impermissible since the pacifist prohibits killing of another person under
any circumstance in all possible worlds. The pacifism holds the model claim that killing is wrong no
matter what the circumstances is in all possible worlds, and equally robust absolutism would say
that torture is wrong in all possible worlds. In Kantian view everyone should act in way to treat
others as ends in

Is Australia's Effective United Nations?
"If Australia wants an effective United Nations, we have to be comprehensively, not marginally,
engaged." Kevin Rudd. This is a statement made by the former Prime Minister of Australia. It
highlights the fact that while Australia is involved with the UN we are not fully engaged with what
they are trying to do. This is shown in our disregard for the laws set forth by them. How can
Australia be an asset to the UN Security Council if they can't follow the laws as part of the general
assembly.
The United Nations is a vessel to keep the peace, they work to prevent conflicts, step in and help
parties in conflict to make peace; peacekeeping; and creating the conditions to allow peace. The UN
security council has the primary responsibility for the aforementioned. They are the division of the
UN that is responsible for maintaining international peace and security. There are fifteen members
and each member has one vote, and under the charter, all Member States are obligated to comply
with the council's decisions (The United Nations, n.d.). The United Nations along with the security
council was formed in 1945, leaders of 50 nations met in San Francisco with representatives of non–
government organizations. It took place at the end of the second world war to prevent that type of
widespread destruction, they formed the United Nations. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
The
The United Nations approach on the treatment of refugees is as follows. the Convention relating to
the status of Refugees 1967 Protocol defines who a refugee is and explains what Rights countries
should afford to refugees. A refugee is a person who is outside of their own country and is unable or
unwilling to return due to a well–founded fear of being persecuted because of their; race, religion,
nationality, membership of a group or political

Argumentive Essay: Pro Terrorist Torture
September 11, 2001, is a moment frozen in time. It was on this day that the world seemed to stop
turning, and its course would never be the same again. It was the day of the largest organized attack
on American citizens that took the lives of 2,976 innocent everyday people (attention grabber).It not
only destroyed buildings, it destroyed lives. Not only the innocent lives of the thousands murdered
in the burning buildings were destroyed, but the lives of their families were destroyed, and their
hearts became filled with hurt and loss. As a result of this unthinkable attack on our country, the
lives of thousands of American Soldiers and their families would soon be affected as well The war
that 9/11 spun Americans and the rest ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
First, as established above, "torture" is not being used on suspected terrorists–– they are using stress
and duress to extract information. Secondly, terrorists openly express their hate for this country and
say they are proud of their actions; none have incriminated themselves by nothing more than the
truth. A terrorist is not going to bluntly admit to something he/she did not do, even if he was
severely tortured which they are not. Government documentation, the definition of the word torture,
and 58% of our nation can prove that. Not to mention, a trial is costly. To fly a terrorist to our
country to have a so–called "fair trial" is ridiculous and costs the people of this nation hard earned
money to have this man put on trial. Not only is it costly, but it brings him/her into the country that
his leaders and fellow terrorists spilt blood in. It is not only ethically incorrect to pay American
money for these terrorists to have American rights; it is unconstitutional to not give someone a fair
trial. Can someone realistically say that a terrorist will receive a fair trial in the country he tried to
commit terrorist acts against? What jury of American citizens would find this man innocent? What
judge will set him free? And even if by some horrible miracle this murderer is set free– what
happens to him? Does he freely walk our streets, or do our citizens spend yet more money to fly this
man back home so he can go back to plotting against us?

Guantanamo Bay Essay
Chapter Two: Literature Review
The creation of Guantanamo Bay served the multiple purposes to detain suspected terrorist, to
collect probable Intelligence, and to protect citizens from possible further terrorist attacks
perpetrated by the detained individuals. The creation of the GTMO detention facilities were born out
a perceived necessity to strengthen the United States' national security after the tragic events of
September 11, 2001. However, throughout Guantanamo Bay's duration as a strategic level detention
facility GTMO has fallen under vast amounts of criticism levied from all corners of the world. With
the imminent closure of the detention centers at Guantanamo Bay, the closure underlines the bigger
issue that a legal alternative ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In fact, the day before the terrorist attacks, Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld gave a speech at the
Pentagon detailing that bureaucracy, at the Pentagon, posed a serious threat to the security of the
United States, and officials had proposed to transform the department, in order to find cheap
alternatives to function better by outsourcing commercially (Zelizer, 2009). However, after the
attacks occurred President Bush viewed them as a declaration of war, and leaped over the judicial
process to push for the Global War on Terror. This approach included the construction of GTMO,
and other detention facilities. The impact of 9/11 forced intelligence agencies to focus on better
understanding human intelligence (Homeland Security, 2015). The approach also forced Americans
to go directly from a false sense of security, to a hair–trigger alertness. Immediately after the
attacks, the general public highly supported any and all action against terrorist groups suspected to
be al–Qaeda (Yoo, 2011). This included detention facilities, such as those at Guantanamo Bay,
which held hundreds of suspected terrorists, in order to superficially strengthen the U.S. national
security initiative, and to prevent further terrorist attacks. The impact of opening and maintaining
Guantanamo Bay, meant that terrorists could be captured, and subsequently punished, while also
serving as a means to gather human intelligence on possible

Argumentative Essay On Torture
While many people object to torture because of the discomfort it causes an individual, somebody
could experience the same discomfort from other occurrences (van der Rijt, 2016). As Jan–Willem
van der Rijt points out in his article "Torture, Dignity, and Humiliation" for the Southern Journal of
Philosophy, in these scenarios, there is not the same "moral horror that torture instills" (van der Rijt,
2016, p. 482). The example of a woman who makes the decision not to have an epidural is used (van
der Rijt, 2016). This woman is clearly suffering, but we do not say this woman is being tortured and
her decision is not condemned like torture is (van der Rijt, 2016). Torture has existed for thousands
of years, with even the Ancient Romans ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
139). However, in "Just Torture," Majima does believe torture is morally permissible in some cases,
which he calls "just torture" (Majima, 2012, p. 143). The circumstances under which torture is
permissible include when an individual is completely certain another person committed a crime and
when there is no other option to solve or prevent a problem (Majima, 2012). The use of torture in
most situations is unequivocally wrong, but there are certain cases where it is needed to use torture
to save lives. While torture is an unpleasant concept to discuss, it is necessary at times. In the film,
no protagonist directly condemns torture, leading the viewer to infer that the characters also believe
torture is sometimes necessary (Antosca, Boal, Ellison, & Bigelow, 2012). A major part of the film
is torture. One of the film's protagonists, CIA agent Dan, tortures Ammar, on multiple occasions to
obtain information (Antosca, Boal, Ellison, & Bigelow, 2012). Ammar gave money to one of the
terrorists involved with 9/11 and is the individual Dan tortures primarily (Antosca, Boal, Ellison, &
Bigelow, 2012). Maya takes part in the torture when she gives Dan the bucket of water used to
waterboard Ammar (Antosca, Boal, Ellison, & Bigelow, 2012). Maya witnesses torture multiple
times but does nothing (Antosca, Boal, Ellison, & Bigelow, 2012). Ammar is forced to wear a dog
collar, exposed in front of Maya, and

Essay about The Human Right Violations at Abu Ghraib
The Human Right Violations at Abu Ghraib
In 1949, the Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War was created to
prohibit immoral, cruel and degrading punishment toward prisoners during wartime. The United
States ratified this covenant and became a member of the Geneva Conventions. During Operation
Iraqi Freedom, a series of human abuses occurred from October through December of 2003 where
American military personnel have conducted acts of brutality and immoral behavior toward Iraqi
detainees at the Abu Ghraib prison. The inhumane "interrogation method" of the American military
have clearly violated Article 2 and 4 of the Geneva Conventions. Article 2.2 states "No exceptional
circumstances whatsoever, whether a state ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The responsibility of this failure is institutional as well as personal at higher levels.
Abu Ghraib and the Root Causes of Abuse
When President Bush declared the War on Terror after the incident of September 11, 2001, he was
declaring a new kind of war on a different kind of enemy. The al–Qaeda terrorist group who were
responsible for the destruction of World Trade Center is organized differently than any enemy that
the U.S. has faced before. Since the terrorists were determined to target large numbers of American
civilians, the Bush administration issued a memorandum which declared the Geneva Conventions
cannot apply to unconventional combatants such as al–Qaeda, it states " I accept the legal
conclusion of the Department of Justice and determine that none of the provisions of Geneva apply
to our conflict with al Qaeda in Afghanistan or elsewhere through the world because; among other
reasons al Qaeda is not a High Contracting Party to Geneva. (Bush 2002)"
In 2002, the Office of Legal Counsel responded to the President's request of exploring the question
whether American officials have the right to use torture against suspected terrorists. Assistant
Attorney General Jay S. Bybee of the Office of Legal Counsel not only legalized the use of torture
for U.S. officials but also defined torture in the narrowest way. He defines torture as inflicting
physical pain, or any serious physical injury such as failure of organs or at the most

The Global War On Terror
Under the United States spearheaded campaign on the global war on terror; much debate has come
forth after the populous learned of the coercive methods employed by the various U.S intelligence
agencies. This highly controversial topic came to fruition after the media broadcast precarious
images of deprived terrorist detainees confined to the Guantanomo military compound in Cuba. The
U.S where using a variety of â€œmethodsâ€ to attain usable intelligence to better protect both the
civilian populous, and Armed Forces service persons currently waging the war on terror. The
question arises, is the means of torturing persons ethical in the moral, social and especially legal
sense? Using a comparative analysis with both the United States common law system and Frances
civil law system, I hope to conclude an effective answer. It is also imperative to comprehend
historical, moral and social aspects of the use and effectiveness of torture. The United States of
America and the world in general are at war. America and several nations are not fighting a
conventional war where two established adversaries meet in battle. They are instead fighting an
unconventional war where the enemy is a non governmental organization of sorts that blends into
the general population and commits act of terror. These terrorists do not adhere to the conventional
rules of combat engagement and aim to strike fear within the general populous to promote a certain
ideal they deem profoundly important.

Dbq on the Usefulness of Torture
The War on Terror has produced several different viewpoints on the utilization of torture and its
effectiveness as a means to elicit information. A main argument has been supplied that torture is
ineffective in its purpose to gather information from the victim. The usefulness of torture has been
questioned because prisoners might use false information to elude their torturers, which has
occurred in previous cases of torture. It has also been supposed that torture is necessary in order to
use the information to save many lives. Torture has been compared to civil disobedience. In
addition, the argument has been raised that torture is immoral and inhumane. Lastly, Some say that
the acts are not even regarded as torture.
Torture is ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
At the same time, he must subject himself to the consequences of an illegal act." The comparison
between civil disobedience and torture is similar to the viewpoint that torture is necessary in order to
save a country.
There are some that do not constitute the United States ' treatment of the prisoners at Abu Ghraib
and Guantanamo as torture because there were different definitions of the word. According to the
Third Geneva Convention, torture is defined as "acts of violence" and "any act by which severe pain
or suffering, whether physical or mental is intentionally inflicted." After the September 11, 2001
attack, the United States changed its definition of torture to "physical pain amounting to torture
must be equivalent in intensity to the pain accompanying serious physical injury, such as organ
failure, impairment of bodily function, or even death." To be regarded as torture, the act "must cause
some lasting, though not necessarily permanent damage." Some disregard these acts as simply cruel
treatment and do

The Pros And Cons Of Prisoners Of War
Prisoners of War are individuals, whether a soldier or civilians, who are captured as a prisoner
during an armed conflict. In the middle ages the modern law was the source relating to the treatment
of Prisoners of War. However, today the modern foundation of international law relating to the
Treatment of Prisoners is the 1949 Geneva Convention. During the Korean War conflict more than
7,500 Americans were detained by the Chinese Communists with only 3,000 returning home. It has
been stated that approximately 1,500 were tortured and 1,800 died of diseases and famine. During
the Vietnam War, the Red Cross Commission requested information regarding the Prisoners of War
being held by the North Vietnam, which they immediately dismissed the request. Therefore,
between 1963 and 1971 it has been estimated that 127 American POW died in the Vietnam Prison.
Subsequently, in 1973 the Paris Peace Agreement allowed 682 American POW to return home.
Though, the whereabouts of over 3,000 Americans soldiers missing in action and the question does
the Socialist Republic of Vietnam know the whereabouts of these missing solider has remained
contentious for years. During the 1991 Persian Gulf War, Saddam Hussein repudiated the
International Red Cross Commission to examine Iraq's Prisoner of War facilities, even though both
Iraq and the United Stated had ratified the 1949 Geneva Convention Treaties. Upon inspection, it
was reported that while incarcerated 25 American POW, which included

Russia And The Ukrainian Government
In war–torn eastern Ukraine, both the Ukrainian government and the separatists acting on behalf of
Russia violate the human rights established in the Convention Against Torture and other Cruel,
Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.Ukraine has been a nation in crisis since 2013,
when then–president Viktor Yanukovych refused to sign an association agreement with the
European Union that had been in the works for years, instead choosing to strengthen ties with
Russia. This led to a political movement and revolution now known as the Euromaidan, which
pushed Viktor Yanukovych out of office and championed their new president, Petro Poroshenko, to
sign an association agreement and take the first steps toward joining the EU. Unfortunately, ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Since then, Ukraine has been struggling to improve human rights amid deteriorating standards of
democracy (Balfour 9). However, the Ukrainian government has an unfortunate pattern of denying
the use of torture despite reports to the contrary. As the Human Rights Watch concludes in their
report Buffeted in the Borderland: The Treatment of Migrants and Asylum Seekers in Ukraine, "We
believe that torture [including electric shock therapy] does occur and that it happens with impunity
and despite Ukrainian officials' denial of its existence" (63). The Ukrainian government has a well–
documented and continuous history of violating civilians' and migrants' human rights with torture
and detentions, and has shown no steps toward improvement. Human Rights Watch furthers their
investigation of Ukrainian torture in their report "You Don't Exist": Arbitrary Detentions, Enforced
Disappearances, and Torture in Eastern Ukraine. HRW worked alongside Amnesty International on
this report, which discusses the case of Vadim a 39–year–old real estate agent from Donetsk, who
was detained and tortured by both the Ukrainian government and Russia–backed separatists in
Eastern Ukraine. The Ukrainian Security Service (SBU) captured Vadim in Slovyansk, accused him
of being

How To Write A Chapter Summary For The War Of The Kingdoms
The War Of The Kingdoms by camrynn newberry
Chapter 1
In the kingdom of Poseidon there was a problem. Someone was stealing from them and King Percy
Knew exactly who it was. It was Finnick from the kingdom of Hades. King Percy sent a messenger
to tell King Blaze to meet him by the war stone the next day at high noon. King Blaze also could
bring as many knights as needed.
The next day at high noon there 2 armies of knights behind each king. King Percy said "The
Kingdom of Poseidon is tired of Finnick stealing our crops. We have an idea that might solve this
problem though. We'll give you ⅓ of our crops for a fourth of yours.". The problem with King
Flame was that King Blaze was very greedy and didn't care about other people but, ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
The guard dumped the red liquid all over wave. The red liquid caused steam to rise off Wave and it
started to burn. Her skin turned crimson red and she started to spit blood. Though she was spitting
blood she could still scream. "Fire water, the greatest torturing device ever." said the guard almost
laughing. Soon she stopped spitting blood, but her body was blistered. The guard who is called the
torturer throughout the two kingdoms left her on the table still screaming. When Wave finally
stopped screaming The Torturer had returned. "So what's next." Wave asked. "I'm not telling you.
You're probably planning to use against me" replied the torture but that was not Waves plan. The
Torturer took a second to think because he had no clue what he would do. Then it struck him. The
Torture undid Waves straps picked her up and walked into another room. In this room were many
things but the old rickety wooden post was where Wave was tied up with her hands behind her back.
The Torture walked behind her to open a furnace. This was Waves chance she slipped her hands out
of the slippery rope and silently ran out of the room. Once she was in the other room she hid and
winced in pain. The Torture ran out of the other room and out the door. Wave

A Long Time Citizens
For a long time citizens have always respected the soldiers who stand to protect the nation, but none
care about how they do it or the psychological traumas they go through. After the Iraq War several
disturbing photos were released to the public. People who were distraught like Susan Sontag spoke
up and demanded an explanation for the events that took place in Abu Ghraib prison. Many have
questioned why no punishment was given to the perpetrators, but were disappointed when no direct
answer was given. Sontag tries to make a connection between the photos the military and their
leaders, and what they portray about the American society in her piece Regarding The Torture Of
Others. She displays acts of the military and their leaders showing justification in their act of torture
to enemies outside the United States. The act of generalizing a nation by an event in its history is not
effective and weakens her argument. This even has shaken the nation's image to the world, creating
a different interpretation about America and its citizens, which might not be accurate. The
photographs of the events that occurred in Abu Ghraib prison shows torture and abuse done to the
prisoners by American soldiers. The photos taken show how the military took pride in abusing and
torturing victims. The act of torturing prisoners gave the military a sense of achievement a
memorable event that needed to be recorded. Susan Sontag observed that, "the perpetrators posing,
gloating, over their helpless

The Importance Of Establishing The Compliance Of Amisom...
CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION
1.0 General Introduction
This study is initiated with the purpose of establishing the compliance of AMISOM with
international statutes while undertaking their peacekeeping duties in Somalia. Many nations have
experienced atrocities from the presence peacekeeping forces in their territories. The input of the
missions is significant to the current state of affairs which improves with each day in Somalia.
However, there is a need to address the injustices committed by the mission's personnel against the
public. This forms the basis of this research which is to give a detailed account of the compliance of
AMISOM troops and personnel with three major international treaties namely The Geneva
Convention 1949, United Nations Convention against Torture (CAT) 1984, and the Convention
Relating to the Status of Refugees (CSR) 195.
1.1 Background of the Study
Since the year 1991, Somalia has not been under a nationally popular government. The fall of Siad
Barre's regime marked the beginning of a turmoil that has known no end till lately. Individual
countries were involved in their own capacities including the United States of America but their
success was never sustainable. The reason for the problems that have faced Somalia has been clans.
Somalia is one of very few countries that speaks one language, has a single popular religion, and
people with the same culture. With such a homogenous population, one would be quick to suppose
that there is harmony. This has

&Quot;Throughout My Detainment In The Solitary Cells, There

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Carmen Martinez

More from Carmen Martinez (11)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

&Quot;Throughout My Detainment In The Solitary Cells, There