20. • American College of Surgeons - development
of “Minimum Standards” for Hospitals
• Established Requirements for Care of Patients
• First Survey Conducted - 1918
• Became “Joint Commission on Accreditation of
Hospitals” in 1952
• Today known as The Joint Commission
1929 Trying Period for Hospitals
• Critical economic conditions
• Lowered bed occupancy
• Decreasing revenues from endowments
Latter Half of 20th Century
• Increased hospital competition
• Many advances in medical technology
– CT, MRI, & PET scanners
• For-profit chains spring up
• Competing delivery systems
25. that probably has caused senile dementia. He did not appear to
recognize the purpose of the interview, nor did he appreciate the
opportunity to present his view to the interviewer. He was able
to state his name but was generally thoroughly hostile and
openly oppositional and sarcastic during the interview. He
refused to give me many details of his past history relating that
I don’t need your help. The patient himself did not speak
spontaneously; he tended to repeat over and over again that he
did not need help, that all he needed was his wife to take him
out of Sweetwater. He did not appear to be able to give me the
current date, time, year or month, nor was he able to give his
location in terms of city or state. He refused to answer most of
my questions, but it was apparent that the patient at times
tended to confabulate and avoided answering questions that he
would have difficulty with by being openly hostile.
He had a very constricted effect that was at times labile, openly
so, in anger and disgust. His mood was depressed, with some
history of sleep disturbance, but he denied any suicidal ideation
or any selfdestructive behavior periods.
(continued)
Date
RE: Conservatorship, Elmer Edward Essing
Page 2
Hypothesis: The patient had general difficulty completing
thought trends. He denied any hallucinations or delusions, but
his guardedness would indicate possible paranoid ideation with
possible unsystemized persecutory delusional system. He felt
there was some type of conspiracy against him to place him at
Sweetwater Home Board and Care. He was unable to recognize
and appreciate his medical and mental circumstances
appropriately and respond to them in an appropriate manner.
26. Judgement was impaired since the patient could not make
medical or financial decisions in his best interest. I do not feel
that he knows the extent of his medical illness or his financial
situation. The patient was disoriented to time, person and place.
IMPRESSION: Organic brain syndrome, probably secondary to
multiple cerebral embolus from history of rheumatic H.D. and
atrial fibrillation.
At this point in time, I feel that the patient is gravely disabled,
that he cannot provide food, shelter, or clothing for himself nor
make decisions in regard3 to his medical or financial affairs in
his best interest.
I recommend that he be continued in a structured living
situation with supervision of medication and recommend
conservatorship of person and property.
If further information is needed, please feel free to contact me
at any time.
Sincerely
Philip B. Michaelson, MD
jk
Letter 11
Letterhead
Date: July 17 2014
27. Winthrop G. Macdonald, MD
5700 Fifth Ave
Philadelphia Pa 17532
Dear Mac
RE: Laverne Lampe
Thank you for referring Mrs Lampe to my office for
gynecological evaluation.
She was first seen on November 10, 2103, but this report was
intentionally delayed until the results from the endometrial
biopsy where obtained.
At the time of the initial visit Mrs Lampe stated that she had
had no menses for 6 to 7 months. However, beginning about 3 to
4 weeks ago she developed a clear discharge which was blood-
tinged during the week of her visit. She denied any pain
associated with this bleeding.
As you are familiar with her past history and review of systems
these will not be reiterated at this time.
Gynecological examination revealed the following: Breasts:
Symmetrical. No masses, tenderness, or induration. No axillary
adenopathy. Abdomen: Flat. Liver, spleen, and kidneys not felt.
No masses, tenderness, or hernias. Pelvic: External genitalia
normal with normal female escutcheon. The introitis is parous.
Perinea is intact. Bartholin and skene urethral glands are
normal. There is no significant cystocel or rectocel. The vaginal
mucosa is healthy in appearance. Direct visualization of the
cervix revealed a small cervical polyp at six o’clock, which was
28. removed. Bimanual palpation revealed the uterus to be retro-
displaced, symmetrical in contour and slightly enlarged. The
adnexal regions and the culdesac felt normal. As noted above,
the cervical polyp was removed.
July 17 2014
RE: Laverne Lampe
Page 2
An endometrial biopsy was done, and the uterus measured 9 CM
in depth, which represents a slight enlargement. A large amount
of hyperplastic/appearing tissue was obtained on the biopsy. As
you know from your copy of the biopsy report, she does have a
grade three cystic endometrial hyperplasia with focal
adenomatous hyperplasia.
This information was conveyed to Mrs Lampe, and the treatment
indicated is a curettage. While I doubt if she has a malignancy,
removal of all this hyperplastic tissue is indicated to make sure
she does not have an in situcarcinoma present. She is a very
apprehensive woman, and at this time, it is unknown whether
she will proceed with the recommended surgery. If she does
return for the curettage, I will see that you receive a copy of the
surgical dictation and the pathology report.
Thank you again for your kindness in referring Mrs Lampe and
for allowing me to assist with her care.
Warmest personal regards.
Very truly yours
29. Martin P. Douglas, MD
Copy: Frank Horowitz MD
22329877_039836_rtn_sko_dnq.docx
22329877_039836
05/17/2019
Thank you for your recent Medical Transcription Graded Project
submission. However, it appears that there are required key
elements of the project that are incorrect or missing. Your
project will not be graded at this time, and an RTN has been
posted to your record. What does RTN mean? When you upload
your work, an RCD is posted alerting us that you have
submitted files. An RCD prevents you from uploading any other
files for that particular project until your work has been
reviewed. A RTN means that your work has been reviewed, and
the project has been returned rather than graded. RTN is not a
penalty of any sort. Most importantly, an RTN allows the
system to accept your corrected work.
Please do not be discouraged and think that we are going to post
a failing grade for your project. You will need to correct your
work (so we are presenting you with an opportunity to make
corrections) and resubmit it as if it were the first attempt. The
grader has provided the instructions needed to correctly
resubmit your work.
Grader's Notes:
30. ⮚Your Graded Project has been returned to you because the
project is not complete.
Please read the Digital Study Guide associated with the graded
project and it will explain the number of reports required for
each graded project. Each report contributes to the total grade
for the project and the absence of a report will greatly reduce
the overall grade. Please take extra care to be sure that all
reports are included in the project when submitted for grading.
⮚Your Graded Project has been returned to you because the
EDITING Reports have not been completed correctly.
After reviewing your Editing Assignments, it is suspected that
the reports were transcribed. This is not the purpose of the
Editing Assignments and your graded project is returned to you
for correction of this process.
The Editing Assignments are included in the graded project to
measure the ability of the student to edit a letter and/or report.
Editing and proofreading are not the same thing and are
explained in the Study Guide.
Please copy and paste the entire Editing Assignment into a
WORD document and review and correct the report as you listen
to the audio file. Listen carefully and correct punctuation,
capitalization, verb tenses, spelling and the use of numerals in
the reports. Do not add words, subtract words, change words or
add medical terminology. Do not alter the format given.
Upon of your Editing Review completion, the report and/or
letter should be perfect to the best of your ability.
Medical Transcription is a skill-building course. Exam
feedback should be considered a learning tool and all feedback
should be read carefully, understood and put into use on the
31. following exam. Submitting and exam before the previous exam
is graded and feedback is available is not beneficial to the
learning process. Take your time. Be patient. Transcription
takes practice and focus.
SLOWING THE SPEED OF THE AUDIO FILES USING AN
MP3 PLAYER
If you cannot understand what is being dictated, slow the speed
on the audio files and try listening again for clarity. In order to
adjust the speed of the audio file to better understand the
dictated material:
1.Right click on white arrow in orange circle in upper left
corner of the opened audio
2.Click Enhancements and then Play Speed Settings
3.Adjust the speed of the dictation by using the slide scale
(allow a few seconds to adjust)
Check the textbook for appropriate punctuation and review the
use of periods, commas, hyphens, etc. Please proofread your
submissions prior to sending to avoid simple mistakes.
If you have any questions about your project, the Transcription
instructor is available by email through the Help Center of your
Student Portal during school hours, after hours and weekends.
You may also call Penn Foster at 1-800-982-1288,and an
instructor will be happy to help you with your questions. Thank
you.
Medical Transcription Instructors
Penn Foster
32. Name : Gomana guirguis
Email : [email protected]
Student number : 22329877
Course Number : MEDICAL TRANSCRIPTION 1 GRADED
PROJECT
Transcription Assignment 1: Letter 21
April 14, 2012
Medical Transcription 1 Graded Project
Mr. Eric Ojeda
Examination number
85 Westwind Way
Northfolk, VA 07225
RE: CONSERVATORSHIP, ELMER EDWARD ESSING
Dear Mr. Ojeda,
I am writing to you in regard to my psychiatric evaluation of the
above-named individual, conducted at Sweetwater Home Board
and Care on November 5, 2012. I was requested by his wife to
evaluate the patient psychiatrically because of the difficulty he
has been experiencing recently in terms of confusion and
33. agitated behavior. His wife asked me to evaluate him at
Sweetwater as it is very difficult for her to transport the
individual to my office because he is confused, disoriented and
at times hostile and belligerent. According to the records, the
patient is 69 years of age, has a history of rheumatic heart
disease with mitral stenosis that is severe, C. H. F., afib, with
history of multiple cerebral emboli that probably has caused
senile dementia. He did not appear to recognize the purpose of
the interview, nor did he appreciate the opportunity to present
his view to the interviewer. He was able to state his name but
was generally thoroughly hostile and openly oppositional and
sarcastic during the interview.
He refused to give me many details of his past history relating
that “I don’t need your help”. The patient himself did not speak
spontaneously; he tended to repeat over and over again that he
did not need help, that all he needed was his wife to take him
out of Sweetwater. He did not appear to be able to give me the
current date, time, year or month, nor was he able to give his
location in terms of city or state. He refused to answer most of
my questions, but it was apparent that the patient at times
tended to confabulate and avoided answering questions that he
would have difficulty with by being openly hostile. He had a
very constricted effect that was at times labile, openly so, in
anger and disgust. His mood was depressed, with some history
of sleep disturbance, but he denied any suicidal ideation or any
self-destructive behavior periods.
(continued)
Date
RE: CONSERVATORSHIP, ELMER EDWARD ESSING
Page 2
Hypothesis: The patient had general difficulty completing
34. thought trends. He denied any hallucinations or delusions, but
his guardedness would indicate possible paranoid ideation with
the possible un-systematized persecutory delusional system. He
felt there was some type of conspiracy against him to place him
at Sweetwater Home Board and Care. He was unable to
recognize and appreciate his medical and mental circumstances
appropriately and respond to them in an appropriate manner.
Judgment was impaired since the patient could not make
medical or financial decisions in his best interest. I do not feel
that he knows the extent of his medical illness or his financial
situation. The patient was disoriented to time, person and place.
IMPRESSION: Organic brain syndrome, probably secondary to
multiple cerebral emboli from the history of rheumatic H.D. and
atrial fibrillation. At this point in time, I feel that the patient is
gravely disabled, that he cannot provide food, shelter, or
clothing for himself nor make decisions in regard3 to his
medical or financial affairs in his best interest. I recommend
that he be continued in a structured living situation with the
supervision of medication and recommend conservatorship of
person and property.
If further information is needed, please feel free to contact me
at any time.
Yours Sincerely
Philip B. Michaelson, MD
35. Transcription Assignment 2: Letter 7
Date: July 17, 2014
Winthrop G. Macdonald, MD
5700 Fifth Ave
Philadelphia Pa 17532
RE: LAVERNE LAMPE
Dear Mac,
Thank you for referring Mrs. Lampe to my office for
gynecological evaluation. She was first seen on November 10,
2103, but this report was intentionally delayed until the results
from the endometrial biopsy where obtained. At the time of the
initial visit, Mrs. Lampe stated that she had had no menses for 6
to 7 months. However, beginning about 3 to 4 weeks ago she
developed a clear discharge which was blood-tinged during the
week of her visit. She denied any pain associated with this
bleeding. As you are familiar with her past history and review
of systems these will not be reiterated at this time.
Gynecological examination revealed the following: Breasts:
Symmetrical. No masses, tenderness, or induration. No axillary
adenopathy. Abdomen: Flat. Liver, spleen, and kidneys not felt.
No masses, tenderness, or hernias. Pelvic: External genitalia
normal with normal female escutcheon. The introitus is porous.
Perinea is intact. Bartholin and skene urethral glands are
normal. There is no significant cystocele or rectocele. The
vaginal mucosa is healthy in appearance. Direct visualization of
the cervix revealed a small cervical polyp at six o’clock, which
was removed. Bimanual palpation revealed the uterus to be
retro-displaced, symmetrical in contour and slightly enlarged.
The adnexal regions and the culdesac felt normal. As noted
above, the cervical polyp was removed.
36. July 17, 2014
RE: LAVERNE LAMPE
Page 2
An endometrial biopsy was done, and the uterus measured 9 CM
in depth, which represents a slight enlargement. A large amount
of hyperplastic/appearing tissue was obtained on the biopsy. As
you know from your copy of the biopsy report, she does have a
grade three cystic endometrial hyperplasia with focal
adenomatous hyperplasia.
This information was conveyed to Mrs. Lampe, and the
treatment indicated is a curettage. While I doubt if she has a
malignancy, removal of all this hyperplastic tissue is indicated
to make sure she does not have an in situ carcinoma present.
She is a very apprehensive woman, and at this time, it is
unknown whether she will proceed with the recommended
surgery. If she does return for the curettage, I will see that you
receive a copy of the surgical dictation and the pathology
report.
Thank you again for your kindness in referring to Mrs. Lampe
and for allowing me to assist with her care.
Warmest personal regards.
Very truly yours,
Martin P. Douglas, MD
Copy: Frank Horowitz MD
37. Editing Assignment 1: Letter 11
Date: July 17, 2014
Winthrop G. Macdonald, MD
5700 Fifth Ave
Philadelphia Pa 17532
RE: LAVERNE LAMPE
Dear Mac,
Thank you for referring Mrs. Lampe to my office for
gynecological evaluation. She was first seen on November 10,
2103, but this report was intentionally delayed until the results
from the endometrial biopsy where obtained. At the time of the
initial visit, Mrs. Lampe stated that she had had no menses for 6
to 7 months. However, beginning about 3 to 4 weeks ago she
developed a clear discharge which was blood-tinged during the
week of her visit. She denied any pain associated with this
bleeding. As you are familiar with her past history and review
of systems these will not be reiterated at this time.
Gynecological examination revealed the following: Breasts:
Symmetrical. No masses, tenderness, or induration. No axillary
adenopathy. Abdomen: Flat. Liver, spleen, and kidneys not felt.
No masses, tenderness, or hernias. Pelvic: External genitalia
normal with normal female escutcheon. The introitus is porous.
Perinea is intact. Bartholin and skene urethral glands are
normal. There is no significant cystocele or rectocele. The
vaginal mucosa is healthy in appearance. Direct visualization of
the cervix revealed a small cervical polyp at six o’clock, which
was removed. Bimanual palpation revealed the uterus to be
38. retro-displaced, symmetrical in contour and slightly enlarged.
The adnexal regions and the culdesac felt normal. As noted
above, the cervical polyp was removed.
July 17, 2014
RE: LAVERNE LAMPE
Page 2
An endometrial biopsy was done, and the uterus measured 9 CM
in depth, which represents a slight enlargement. A large amount
of hyperplastic/appearing tissue was obtained on the biopsy. As
you know from your copy of the biopsy report, she does have a
grade three cystic endometrial hyperplasia with focal
adenomatous hyperplasia.
This information was conveyed to Mrs. Lampe, and the
treatment indicated is a curettage. While I doubt if she has a
malignancy, removal of all this hyperplastic tissue is indicated
to make sure she does not have an in situ carcinoma present.
She is a very apprehensive woman, and at this time, it is
unknown whether she will proceed with the recommended
surgery. If she does return for the curettage, I will see that you
receive a copy of the surgical dictation and the pathology
report.
Thank you again for your kindness in referring to Mrs. Lampe
and for allowing me to assist with her care.
Warmest personal regards.
Very truly yours,
39. Martin P. Douglas, MD
Copy: Frank Horowitz MD
Editing Assignment 2: Letter 21
April 14, 2012
Medical Transcription 1 Graded Project
Mr. Eric Ojeda
Examination number
85 Westwind Way
Northfolk, VA 07225
RE: CONSERVATORSHIP, ELMER EDWARD ESSING
Dear Mr. Ojeda,
I am writing to you in regard to my psychiatric evaluation of the
above-named individual, conducted at Sweetwater Home Board
and Care on November 5, 2012. I was requested by his wife to
evaluate the patient psychiatrically because of the difficulty he
has been experiencing recently in terms of confusion and
agitated behavior. His wife asked me to evaluate him at
Sweetwater as it is very difficult for her to transport the
individual to my office because he is confused, disoriented and
at times hostile and belligerent. According to the records, the
patient is 69 years of age, has a history of rheumatic heart
disease with mitral stenosis that is severe, C. H. F., afib, with
40. history of multiple cerebral emboli that probably has caused
senile dementia. He did not appear to recognize the purpose of
the interview, nor did he appreciate the opportunity to present
his view to the interviewer. He was able to state his name but
was generally thoroughly hostile and openly oppositional and
sarcastic during the interview.
He refused to give me many details of his past history relating
that “I don’t need your help”. The patient himself did not speak
spontaneously; he tended to repeat over and over again that he
did not need help, that all he needed was his wife to take him
out of Sweetwater. He did not appear to be able to give me the
current date, time, year or month, nor was he able to give his
location in terms of city or state. He refused to answer most of
my questions, but it was apparent that the patient at times
tended to confabulate and avoided answering questions that he
would have difficulty with by being openly hostile. He had a
very constricted effect that was at times labile, openly so, in
anger and disgust. His mood was depressed, with some history
of sleep disturbance, but he denied any suicidal ideation or any
self-destructive behavior periods.
(continued)
Date
RE: Conservatorship, Elmer Edward Essing
Page 2
Hypothesis: The patient had general difficulty completing
thought trends. He denied any hallucinations or delusions, but
his guardedness would indicate possible paranoid ideation with
the possible un-systematized persecutory delusional system. He
felt there was some type of conspiracy against him to place him
at Sweetwater Home Board and Care. He was unable to
recognize and appreciate his medical and mental circumstances
appropriately and respond to them in an appropriate manner.
41. Judgment was impaired since the patient could not make
medical or financial decisions in his best interest. I do not feel
that he knows the extent of his medical illness or his financial
situation. The patient was disoriented to time, person and place.
IMPRESSION: Organic brain syndrome, probably secondary to
multiple cerebral emboli from the history of rheumatic H.D. and
atrial fibrillation. At this point in time, I feel that the patient is
gravely disabled, that he cannot provide food, shelter, or
clothing for himself nor make decisions in regard3 to his
medical or financial affairs in his best interest. I recommend
that he be continued in a structured living situation with the
supervision of medication and recommend conservatorship of
person and property.
If further information is needed, please feel free to contact me
at any time.
Yours Sincerely
Philip B. Michaelson, MD
42. Files for Required Transcription Assignment 1/Editing
Assignment 2 - Letter 21 - Edit This File.docx
Letter 21
Letterhead
April 14, 2012
Mr Eric Ojeda
85 Westwind Way
Northfolk, VA 07225
Dear Mr Ojeda
RE: Conservatorship, Elmer Edward Essing
I am writing you in regard to my psychiatric evaluation of the
above-named individual, conducted at Sweetwater Home Board
and Care on November 5, 2012.
I was requested by his wife to evaluate the patient
psychiatrically because of the difficulty he has been
experiencing recently in terms of confusion and agitated
behavior. His wife asked me to evaluate him at Sweetwater as it
is very difficult for her to transport the individual to my office
because he is confused disoriented and at times hostile and
belligerent.
According to the records, the patient is 69 years of age, has a
history of rheumatic heart disease with mitral stenosis that is
severe, C. H. F., afib, with history of multiple cerebral emboli
that probably has caused senile dementia. He did not appear to
recognize the purpose of the interview, nor did he appreciate the
opportunity to present his view to the interviewer. He was able
to state his name but was generally thoroughly hostile and
openly oppositional and sarcastic during the interview. He
refused to give me many details of his past history relating that
43. I don’t need your help. The patient himself did not speak
spontaneously; he tended to repeat over and over again that he
did not need help, that all he needed was his wife to take him
out of Sweetwater. He did not appear to be able to give me the
current date, time, year or month, nor was he able to give his
location in terms of city or state. He refused to answer most of
my questions, but it was apparent that the patient at times
tended to confabulate and avoided answering questions that he
would have difficulty with by being openly hostile.
He had a very constricted effect that was at times labile, openly
so, in anger and disgust. His mood was depressed, with some
history of sleep disturbance, but he denied any suicidal ideation
or any selfdestructive behavior periods.
(continued)
Date
RE: Conservatorship, Elmer Edward Essing
Page 2
Hypothesis: The patient had general difficulty completing
thought trends. He denied any hallucinations or delusions, but
his guardedness would indicate possible paranoid ideation with
possible unsystemized persecutory delusional system. He felt
there was some type of conspiracy against him to place him at
Sweetwater Home Board and Care. He was unable to recognize
and appreciate his medical and mental circumstances
appropriately and respond to them in an appropriate manner.
Judgement was impaired since the patient could not make
medical or financial decisions in his best interest. I do not feel
that he knows the extent of his medical illness or his financial
situation. The patient was disoriented to time, person and place.
IMPRESSION: Organic brain syndrome, probably secondary to
44. multiple cerebral embolus from history of rheumatic H.D. and
atrial fibrillation.
At this point in time, I feel that the patient is gravely disabled,
that he cannot provide food, shelter, or clothing for himself nor
make decisions in regard3 to his medical or financial affairs in
his best interest.
I recommend that he be continued in a structured living
situation with supervision of medication and recommend
conservatorship of person and property.
If further information is needed, please feel free to contact me
at any time.
Sincerely
Philip B. Michaelson, MD
jk
Files for Required Transcription Assignment 1/Editing
Assignment 2 - Letter 21 Audio.mp3
Blues
254737.05
Files for Required Transcription Assignment 1/Editing
Assignment 3 - Letter 11 - Edit This File.docx
Letter 11
Letterhead
45. Date: July 17 2014
Winthrop G. Macdonald, MD
5700 Fifth Ave
Philadelphia Pa 17532
Dear Mac
RE: Laverne Lampe
Thank you for referring Mrs Lampe to my office for
gynecological evaluation.
She was first seen on November 10, 2103, but this report was
intentionally delayed until the results from the endometrial
biopsy where obtained.
At the time of the initial visit Mrs Lampe stated that she had
had no menses for 6 to 7 months. However, beginning about 3 to
4 weeks ago she developed a clear discharge which was blood-
tinged during the week of her visit. She denied any pain
associated with this bleeding.
As you are familiar with her past history and review of systems
these will not be reiterated at this time.
Gynecological examination revealed the following: Breasts:
Symmetrical. No masses, tenderness, or induration. No axillary
adenopathy. Abdomen: Flat. Liver, spleen, and kidneys not felt.
No masses, tenderness, or hernias. Pelvic: External genitalia
normal with normal female escutcheon. The introitis is parous.
Perinea is intact. Bartholin and skene urethral glands are
normal. There is no significant cystocel or rectocel. The vaginal
mucosa is healthy in appearance. Direct visualization of the
46. cervix revealed a small cervical polyp at six o’clock, which was
removed. Bimanual palpation revealed the uterus to be retro-
displaced, symmetrical in contour and slightly enlarged. The
adnexal regions and the culdesac felt normal. As noted above,
the cervical polyp was removed.
July 17 2014
RE: Laverne Lampe
Page 2
An endometrial biopsy was done, and the uterus measured 9 CM
in depth, which represents a slight enlargement. A large amount
of hyperplastic/appearing tissue was obtained on the biopsy. As
you know from your copy of the biopsy report, she does have a
grade three cystic endometrial hyperplasia with focal
adenomatous hyperplasia.
This information was conveyed to Mrs Lampe, and the treatment
indicated is a curettage. While I doubt if she has a malignancy,
removal of all this hyperplastic tissue is indicated to make sure
she does not have an in situcarcinoma present. She is a very
apprehensive woman, and at this time, it is unknown whether
she will proceed with the recommended surgery. If she does
return for the curettage, I will see that you receive a copy of the
surgical dictation and the pathology report.
Thank you again for your kindness in referring Mrs Lampe and
for allowing me to assist with her care.
Warmest personal regards.
Very truly yours
49. transcribe the letter as dictated.
2. Transcription Assignment 2: Letter 7
Access the recorded dictation as provided and prepare the
letter. Be sure to
transcribe the letter as dictated.
3. Editing Assignment 1: Letter 11
Access the transcribed letter and audio
file, and edit the letter for errors in
spelling, punctuation, grammar, and letter format.
4. Editing Assignment 2: Letter 21
Access the transcribed letter and audio file, and edit
the letter for errors in
spelling, punctuation, grammar, and letter format.
HOW TO COMPLETE THE ASSIGNMENTS
1. Type or proofread each letter in the order given.
2. Review your work carefully. For the transcription
assignments, it’s a good idea to
replay your file and listen to it as you read
each report. You’ll be able to catch any
errors and reinforce your terminology at the same time. Don’t
rely on a computer
spell checker. For the proofreading and editing assignments,
reread the document to
find additional errors you may have missed. It may
also help to read the document
aloud to catch any mistakes you might have missed.
51. chapters’ lists to find the word. Also
check the lists of medical terms and the lists of drugs,
instruments, tests, and other
terms in the Appendix.
7. If you’re still unable to transcribe the word, make an
educated guess. If you can’t
transcribe a word, it’s better to leave a blank space on your
dictation and properly
flag the missing entrythan to guess and use the
wrong word. Please refer to your
textbook for information on proper flagging.
SUBMITTING YOUR PROJECT
You must submit these four letter assignments in ONE word-
processing document and
not as individual files in a folder. If you’ve
completedthe assignments as individual docu-
ments, you’ll need to copy and paste all assignments into ONE
word-processing document.
Acceptable formats for submitting your work include Microsoft
Word documents (.doc and
.docx) or Rich Text Format (.rtf). No other format is to be used
for submitting this project.
n Transcription Assignment 1: Letter 2
n Transcription Assignment 2: Letter 7
n Editing Assignment 1: Letter 11
n Editing Assignment 2: Letter 21
Each assignment is individually graded by your instructor and
therefore takes up to a few
weeks to grade.
69. Government Organization
• Legislative Branch
• Executive Branch
• Judicial Branch
Branches & Powers of Government
Legislative Executive Judicial
Write laws Implement &
Enforce Laws
Interpret Laws
Enact, amend,
or repeal Laws
Veto Laws Apply Laws
Declare War
Confirm Justices
Commander-in-
Chief Armed
Forces
70. Declare laws
unconstitutional
Enact Taxes &
set the budget
Appoint Justices Compel
Testimony
Scarcely any political question arises
in the United States that is not
resolved, sooner or later, into a
judicial question.
−Alexis de Tocqueville (1805–1859)
Judicial Branch
• When government bureaus & agencies go
awry, which are adjuncts of the legislative or
executive branches, the people flee to the
third branch, their courts, for solace & justice.
Federal Court System
• District Courts
• U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals