1) The document discusses IUPUI's process for developing and implementing an open access policy for faculty scholarship. Key steps included advocacy from the library dean, passing a librarian policy in 2009, hiring a scholarly communications librarian in 2013, and gaining approval from a faculty committee.
2) The document outlines workflows for liaisons to identify and obtain faculty publications for open access archiving through outreach and database searches. It also describes the roles of liaisons and the Center for Digital Scholarship staff in preparing and uploading articles.
3) Common questions from faculty about open access are addressed, and tips are provided for liaisons to promote open access adoption through effective outreach and communication with faculty.
IUPUI Liaison Strategies for Promoting Open Access
1. Bronwen K. Maxson
IUPUI Liaison to English and Spanish
SALALM60, Princeton University
July 13-17, 2015
Background photo: Simone Staiger, http://ciatblogs.cgiar.org/knowledgemanagement/open-access-essentials/
3. OA in Latin America
• 72% of Latin American
indexed journals are Open
Access
• 13% of all journals
worldwide are Open
Access
4. Key steps to IUPUI’s OA Policy
• It’s part of the library’s evolving mission
– Our library dean, David Lewis, is an advocate
– Librarians passed a policy for librarians in 2009
– We hired a scholarly communications librarian in 2013, Jere Odell
• The White House, Office of Science & Technology issued a
memo in February 2013: “Increasing Access to the Results
of Federally Funded Scientific Research”
• Our library dean presented a draft of the policy to a
committee of Faculty Council
• Jere archived papers from prolific researchers on campus
with their cooperation. This created “embedded advocates”
in each department
5. UL
Center for
Digital
Scholarshi
p or
1
1
Check for citations
and permissions
2
Request article
3
Faculty sends article, (sometimes it’s the
publisher’s version that we can’t upload)
4 Receive article, (request post-print,
a.k.a., “accepted manuscript”)
(5) (Locate and send “accepted
manuscript”)
6 Receive manuscript,
prepare it, send to CDS
7 Receive PDF,
upload, & notify
faculty and liaison
Workflow before OA Policy
Liaison
Librarian
Faculty
6. Full name Campus Google
Scholar
search
PubMed
search
Scopus
search
GS profile? Notes
Schultz, Jane IUPUI author: “jane e
schultz”
Schultz
JE[Author]
Indiana
Schultz, Jane E. No Publishes in
Literature and
Medical
Humanities
Discovering Citations
Tips:
• Set up alerts in Google Scholar,
PubMed, and Scopus
• If faculty have a Google Scholar
profile, follow them
• Search about 10 authors at a
time in Google Scholar
7. Preparing (some) metadata in Word
Tasks:
• Check the Title and
Author field in the
document’s Properties in
MS Word
• Then, Convert document
to PDF
• CDS staff does the rest of
the metadata work
8. Proposed workflow for liaisons
CDS staff runs
a weekly
database
search in
Scopus
CDS staff sends
email to liaison
with faculty
members’
citations
Liaison
customizes a
template email
to send to
faculty
requesting
manuscript
Liaison forwards
manuscript to
CDS staff at:
oapoicy@iupui.e
du
Faculty sends
manuscript to
the liaison (or
opts out
9. CDS staff responsibilities
CDS staff fills
out a
spreadsheet
with
document’s
metadata
Document is
cleaned,
formatted, and
uploaded with
metadata to
ScholarWorks (IR)
CDS staff sends an
email to faculty and
copies liaison
10.
11. Questions from faculty
Doesn’t this
violate
copyright?
What about
impact factor?
How will others know
page numbers if they
are not citing from the
published PDF?
I have most of the
PDFs; do you want
me to attach them, or
is it easier to extract
them from your
databases?
Will my
publisher allow
me to archive
my book
chapter?
What do I do
when images
are separate
files from the
text?
12. Tips for the liaison
• Make process convenient for faculty
• Communicate regularly
• Keep good records, document your steps
• Track your own response rate
• Re-visit workflow (it’s not “one size fits all”)
• Beyond workflow:
– usability testing for new site
– present at department meetings
– promote OA week on campus and online
– incorporate OA resources in instruction
• Have a “Yes” attitude
13.
14. Thanks
• Jere Odell, IUPUI’s Scholarly Communications Librarian,
Liaison to the School of Public Environmental Affairs
• Caitlin Pike, IUPUI’s Liaison to Medical Humanities and
the School of Nursing
Kevin E. Smith, Director of the Office of Copyright and Scholarly Communication at Duke wrote a blog in response to hearing Harvard Professor Larry Lessig, speak at ACRL in March. He describes some publishers as “modern day colonists”:
“Their rule – no one should ever learn anything without paying us – is a recipe for continued ignorance and inequality.”
Kevin Smith suggests that Open Access advocates should point out “publishing in toll access journals and neglecting open access options or additional means of dissemination is not just short-sighted. It is dumb, and it is harmful.”
[handout]
“Now, most all nationally published journals in Latin America are Open Access. ‘Today, if it’s not on the web, it doesn’t exist,’ says [Abel] Packer. In 2010, around 85% of academic publications in Latin America were publicly available through the Internet, however, about 35% satisfied Open Access journal standards of the Budapest Declaration [2001 Open Society Institute meeting in Budapest -> BOAI]. Currently, Scopus Journal catalogue points to the statistic that 72% of Latin American indexed journals are Open Access compared to about 13% of all journals.” [Adams, n.d. (circa 2014)]
This memo got Jere in the door of the Associate Dean for Research, who endorsed the policy, which in turn gave us the self-confidence to keep going.
The sub-committee was key to getting the policy to move through faculty governance
[mention handout]
Problematic for tracking steps. Creates back-and-forth and opportunities to “drop the ball”
Spreadsheet sample
[Mention template email in handout]
ScholarWorks = Institutional repository
Faculty can also deposit manuscripts themselves
FAQs are longer than the policy
After the policy passed, and it wasn’t mass chaos. I did not have faculty flooding my inbox with questions or manuscripts. Instead, it was very quiet. I worked with a few faculty members who were up for tenure and promotion and wanted to have [alternative] citation counts included in their dossier, which is a service we provide.
[mention Erin McKiernan YouTube on handout]
IUPUI is somewhere between Rice University’s “good enough” and the MIT/Harvard model.
Be willing to try, even if you’re not sure how it will go. Know your faculty--use your outreach skills and personal connections.
[handout deparment meetings; We’re somewhere in between Harvard and Rice when it comes to workflow]
Providing open access to scholarship makes our world better for everyone, especially those who need it most and those who would otherwise never have access.
As a liaison, think of creative ways you can incorporate OA in to your regular duties.
If you are working on creating a similar policy, figuring out path through faculty governance and cultivating advocates on campus is key.
Finally, the policy doesn’t have to end the world of publishing as we know it. The Harvard-model opt-out policy –
Increases citation rates, which are already being measured in new ways
Respects author rights and academic freedom, they are the first owners of copyright and can opt out
“Green” OA respects publisher rights (points scholars to the final, published version, which they would need to cite)