1. NURS 6051 Assignment 2 due March 6
To Prepare:Review the concepts of technology application Reflect on how emerging
technologies such as artificial intelligence may help fortify nursing informatics as a specialty
by leading to increased impact on patient outcomes or patient care efficiencies.The
Assignment: (4-5 pages)In a 4- to 5-page project proposal written to the leadership of your
healthcare organization, propose a nursing informatics project for your organization that
you advocate to improve patient outcomes or patient-care efficiency. Your project proposal
should include the following:Describe the project you propose.Identify the stakeholders
impacted by this project.Explain the patient outcome(s) or patient-care efficiencies this
project is aimed at improving and explain how this improvement would occur. Be specific
and provide examples.Identify the technologies required to implement this project and
explain why.Identify the project team (by roles) and explain how you would incorporate the
nurse informaticist in the project
team. RubricName: NURS_6051_Module02_Week03_Assignment_RubricGrid ViewList
ViewExcellentGoodFairPoorIn a 4- to 5-page project proposal written to the leadership of
your healthcare organization, propose a nursing informatics project for your organization
that you advocate to improve patient outcomes or patient care efficiency. Your project
proposal should include the following:· Describe the project you propose.· Identify the
stakeholders impacted by this project.· Explain the patient outcome(s) or patient-care
efficiencies this project is aimed at improving, and explain how this improvement would
occur. Be specific and provide examples.· Identify the technologies required to implement
this project and explain why.· Identify the project team (by roles) and explain how you
would incorporate the nurse informaticist in the project team.77 (77%) – 85 (85%)The
response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the project proposed. The response
accurately and clearly identifies the stakeholders impacted by the project proposed. The
response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail the patient outcome(s) or patient-
care efficiencies that the project proposed is aimed at improving, including an accurate and
detailed explanation, with sufficient supporting evidence of how this improvement would
occur. The response accurately and clearly identifies the technologies required to
implement the project proposed with a detailed explanation why. The response accurately
and clearly identifies the project team (by roles) and thoroughly explains in detail how to
incorporate the nurse informaticist in the project team.68 (68%) – 76 (76%)The response
describes the project proposed. The response identifies the stakeholders impacted by the
project proposed. The response explains the patient outcome(s) or patient-care efficiencies
2. that the project proposed is aimed at improving, including an explanation, with some
supporting evidence of how this improvement would occur. The response identifies the
technologies required to implement the project proposed with an explanation why. The
response identifies the project team (by roles) and explains how to incorporate the nurse
informaticist in the project team.60 (60%) – 67 (67%)The response describing the project
proposed is vague or inaccurate. The response identifying the stakeholders impacted by the
project proposed is vague or inaccurate. The response explaining the patient outcome(s) or
patient-care efficiencies the project proposed is aimed at improving, including an
explanation of how this improvement would occur, is vague or inaccurate, or includes little
to no supporting evidence. The response identifying the technologies required to implement
the project proposed with an explanation why is vague or inaccurate. The response
identifying the project team (by roles) and an explanation of how to incorporate the nurse
informaticist in the project team is vague or inaccurate.0 (0%) – 59 (59%)The response
describing the project proposed is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. The response
identifying the stakeholders impacted by the project proposed is vague and inaccurate, or is
missing. The response explaining the patient outcome(s) or patient-care efficiencies the
project proposed is aimed at improving, including an explanation of how this improvement
would occur, is vague and inaccurate, includes no supporting evidence, or is missing. The
response identifying the technologies required to implement the project proposed with an
explanation why is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. The response identifying the project
team (by roles) and an explanation of how to incorporate the nurse informaticist in the
project team is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.Written Expression and Formatting –
Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well
developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully
focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.5 (5%) – 5
(5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.4
(4%) – 4 (4%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and
clarity 80% of the time.3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing
standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Paragraphs
and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the
time.Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar,
mechanics, and proper punctuation5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Uses correct grammar, spelling, and
punctuation with no errors.4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and
punctuation errors.3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and
punctuation errors.0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation
errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.Written Expression and Formatting –
The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins,
indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference
list.5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Uses correct APA format with no errors.4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Contains a few
(1-2) APA format errors.3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.0
(0%) – 3 (3%)Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.Total Points:
100Name: NURS_6051_Module02_Week03_Assignment_Rubric
