The collection of evidence is an activity that occurs with an endgame in mind. For example, law enforcement professionals collect evidence to support a decision to charge those accused of criminal activity. Similarly, evidence-based healthcare practitioners collect evidence to support decisions in pursuit of specific healthcare outcomes.  In this Assignment, you will identify an issue or opportunity for change within your healthcare organization and propose an idea for a change in practice supported by an EBP approach. To Prepare: Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you critically appraised in Module 4.  Reflect on your current healthcare organization and think about potential opportunities for evidence-based change.  The Assignment: (Evidence-Based Project) Part 5: Recommending an Evidence-Based Practice Change Create an 8- to 9-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following: Briefly describe your healthcare organization, including its culture and readiness for change. (You may opt to keep various elements of this anonymous, such as your company name.)Chicago Lakeshore Hospital Describe the current problem or opportunity for change. Include in this description the circumstances surrounding the need for change, the scope of the issue, the stakeholders involved, and the risks associated with change implementation in general. Propose an evidence-based idea for a change in practice using an EBP approach to decision making. Note that you may find further research needs to be conducted if sufficient evidence is not discovered. Describe your plan for knowledge transfer of this change, including knowledge creation, dissemination, and organizational adoption and implementation.   Describe the measurable outcomes you hope to achieve with the implementation of this evidence-based change. Be sure to provide APA citations of the supporting evidence-based peer reviewed articles you selected to support your thinking. Add a lessons learned section that includes the following: A summary of the critical appraisal of the peer-reviewed articles you previously submitted An explanation about what you learned from completing the evaluation table (1 slide)  An explanation about what you learned from completing the levels of evidence table (1 slide) An explanation about what you learned from completing the outcomes synthesis table (1 slide) Rurbic: Part 5: Recommending an Evidence-Based Practice Change Create an 8- to 9-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following: ·   Briefly describe your healthcare organization, including its culture and readiness for change.   ·   Describe the current problem or opportunity for change. Include in this description the circumstances surrounding the need for change, the scope of the issue, the stakeholders involved, and the risks associated with change implementation in general.--Levels of Achievement:Excellent 18 (18%) - 20 (20%) The prese.

1. The collection of evidence is an activity that occurs with an
endgame in mind. For example, law enforcement professionals
collect evidence to support a decision to charge those accused
of criminal activity. Similarly, evidence-based healthcare
practitioners collect evidence to support decisions in pursuit of
specific healthcare outcomes.
In this Assignment, you will identify an issue or opportunity for
change within your healthcare organization and propose an idea
for a change in practice supported by an EBP approach.
To Prepare:
Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you critically
appraised in Module 4.
Reflect on your current healthcare organization and think about
potential opportunities for evidence-based change.
The Assignment:
(Evidence-Based Project)
Part 5: Recommending an Evidence-Based Practice Change
Create an 8- to 9-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do
the following:
Briefly describe your healthcare organization, including its
culture and readiness for change. (You may opt to keep various
elements of this anonymous, such as your company
name.)Chicago Lakeshore Hospital

2. Describe the current problem or opportunity for change. Include
in this description the circumstances surrounding the need for
change, the scope of the issue, the stakeholders involved, and
the risks associated with change implementation in general.
Propose an evidence-based idea for a change in practice using
an EBP approach to decision making. Note that you may find
further research needs to be conducted if sufficient evidence is
not discovered.
Describe your plan for knowledge transfer of this change,
including knowledge creation, dissemination, and organizational
adoption and implementation.
Describe the measurable outcomes you hope to achieve with the
implementation of this evidence-based change.
Be sure to provide APA citations of the supporting evidence-
based peer reviewed articles you selected to support your
thinking.
Add a lessons learned section that includes the following:
A summary of the critical appraisal of the peer-reviewed
articles you previously submitted
An explanation about what you learned from completing the
evaluation table (1 slide)
An explanation about what you learned from completing the
levels of evidence table (1 slide)
An explanation about what you learned from completing the
outcomes synthesis table (1 slide)

3. Rurbic:
Part 5: Recommending an Evidence-Based Practice Change
Create an 8- to 9-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do
the following:
· Briefly describe your healthcare organization, including its
culture and readiness for change.
· Describe the current problem or opportunity for change.
Include in this description the circumstances surrounding the
need for change, the scope of the issue, the stakeholders
involved, and the risks associated with change implementation
in general.--Levels of Achievement:Excellent 18 (18%) - 20
(20%)
The presentation clearly and accurately describes in detail a
healthcare organization, including a detailed explanation of its
culture and readiness for change.
The presentation clearly and accurately describes in detail a
current problem or opportunity for change.

4. An accurate, specific, and detailed description of the
circumstances surrounding the need for change, the scope of the
issue, the stakeholders involved, and the risks associated with
change implementation in general is provided.
Good 16 (16%) - 17 (17%)
The presentation accurately describes a healthcare organization,
including an accurate explanation of its culture and readiness
for change.
The presentation accurately describes a current problem or
opportunity for change.
An accurate description of the circumstances surrounding the
need for change, the scope of the issue, the stakeholders
involved, and the risks associated with the change
implementation in general is provided.
Fair 14 (14%) - 15 (15%)
The presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes a healthcare
organization, including an inaccurate or vague explanation of its
culture and readiness for change.
The presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes a current
problem or opportunity for change.
An inaccurate or vague description of the circumstances
surrounding the need for change, the scope of the issue, the
stakeholders involved, and the risks associated with the change

5. implementation in general is provided.
Poor 0 (0%) - 13 (13%)
The presentation inaccurately and vaguely describes a
healthcare organization, including an inaccurate and vague
explanation of its culture and readiness for change, or is
missing.
The presentation inaccurately and vaguely describes a current
problem or opportunity for change or is missing.
An inaccurate and vague description of the circumstances
surrounding the need for change, the scope of the issue, the
stakeholders involved, and the risks associated with the change
implementation in general is provided or is missing.Feedback:
· Propose an evidence-based idea for a change in practice
using an evidence-based practice approach to decision making.
Note that you may find further research needs to be conducted if
sufficient evidence is not discovered.
· Describe your plan for knowledge transfer of this change,
including knowledge creation, dissemination, and organizational
adoption and implementation.
· Describe the measurable outcomes you hope to achieve with
the implementation of this evidence-based change.
· Be sure to provide APA citations of the supporting evidence-
based peer-reviewed articles you selected to support your
thinking.--Levels of Achievement:Excellent 32 (32%) - 35
(35%)

6. The presentation clearly and accurately proposes in detail an
evidence-based idea for a change in practice that is fully
aligned to an evidence-based practice approach for decision
making.
The presentation clearly and accurately describes in detail a
plan for knowledge transfer of this change, including a detailed
plan for knowledge creation, dissemination, and organizational
adoption and implementation that is specific.
The presentation clearly and accurately describes in detail the
measurable outcomes desired for the implementation of the
evidence-based change.
The presentation includes accurate, complete, and full APA
citations of the supporting evidence-based peer-reviewed
articles selected.
Good 28 (28%) - 31 (31%)
The presentation accurately proposes an evidence-based idea for
a change in practice that is adequately aligned to an evidence-
based practice approach for decision making.
The presentation accurately describes a plan for knowledge
transfer of this change, including a plan for knowledge creation,
dissemination, and organizational adoption and implementation
that is adequate.
The presentation accurately describes the measurable outcomes

7. desired for the implementation of the evidence-based changes.
The presentation includes accurate APA citations of the
supporting evidence-based peer-reviewed articles selected.
Fair 25 (25%) - 27 (27%)
The presentation inaccurately or vaguely proposes an evidence-
based idea for a change in practice that may be aligned to an
evidence-based practice approach for decision making.
The presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes a plan for
knowledge transfer of this change, including a plan for
knowledge creation, dissemination, and organizational adoption
and implementation that may be relevant.
The presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes the
measurable outcomes desired for the implementation of the
evidence-based change.
Inaccurate and incomplete APA citations of the supporting
evidence-based peer-reviewed articles selected are provided.
Poor 0 (0%) - 24 (24%)
The presentation inaccurately and vaguely proposes an
evidence-based idea for a change in practice that is not aligned
to an evidence-based practice approach for decision making or
is missing.
The presentation inaccurately and vaguely describes a plan for

8. knowledge transfer of this change, including a plan for
knowledge creation, dissemination, and organizational adoption
that implementation that is incomplete, or is missing.
The presentation inaccurately and vaguely describes the
measurable outcomes desired for the implementation of the
evidence-based change or is missing.
Inaccurate and incomplete APA citations of the supporting
evidence-based peer-reviewed articles selected are provided or
are missing.Feedback:
Add a lessons learned section that includes:
· A summary of the critical appraisal of the peer-reviewed
articles you previously submitted.
· What did you learn from completing the evaluation table?
· What did you learn from completing the levels of evidence
table?
· What did you learn from completing the outcomes synthesis
table?--Levels of Achievement:Excellent 27 (27%) - 30 (30%)
The presentation clearly and accurately summarizes in detail the
critical appraisal process of the peer-reviewed articles
previously submitted.
The presentation thoroughly describes in detail at least one
lesson learned from completing the evaluation table that is

9. specific.
The presentation thoroughly describes in detail at least one
lesson learned from completing the levels of evidence table that
is specific.
The presentation thoroughly describes in detail at least one
lesson learned from completing the outcomes synthesis table
that is specific.
The presentation provides a complete, detailed, and specific
synthesis of two outside resources reviewed on the lessons
learned explained. The presentation fully integrates at least two
outside resources and two or three course-specific resources
that fully support the presentation.
Good 24 (24%) - 26 (26%)
The presentation accurately summarizes the critical appraisal
process of the peer-reviewed articles previously submitted.
The presentation accurately describes at least one lesson learned
from completing the evaluation table that may include some
specificity.
The presentation accurately describes at least one lesson learned
from completing the levels of evidence table that may include
some specificity.
The presentation accurately describes at least one lesson learned

10. from completing the outcomes synthesis table that may include
some specificity.
The presentation provides an accurate synthesis of at least one
outside resource reviewed related to the lessons learned
explained. The presentation integrates at least one outside
resource and two or three course-specific resources that may
support the presentation.
Fair 21 (21%) - 23 (23%)
The presentation inaccurately or vaguely summarizes the
critical appraisal process of the peer-reviewed articles
previously submitted.
The presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes at least one
lesson learned from completing the evaluation table and may
lack some specificity.
The presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes at least one
lesson learned from completing the levels of evidence table and
may lack some specificity.
The presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes at least one
lesson learned from completing the outcomes synthesis table
and may lack some specificity.
The presentation provides a vague or inaccurate synthesis of
outside resources reviewed related to the lessons learned
explained. The response minimally integrates resources that
may support the presentation.

11. Poor 0 (0%) - 20 (20%)
The presentation inaccurately and vaguely summarizes the
critical appraisal process of the peer-reviewed articles
previously submitted or is missing.
The presentation inaccurately and vaguely describes at least one
lesson learned from completing the evaluation table and lacks
specificity or is missing.
The presentation inaccurately and vaguely describes at least one
lesson learned from completing the levels of evidence table that
lacks specificity or is missing.
The presentation inaccurately and vaguely describes at least one
lesson learned from completing the outcomes synthesis table
that lacks specificity or is missing.
The presentation provides a vague and inaccurate synthesis of
no outside resources related to the lessons learned explained or
is missing. The presentation fails to incorporate any resources
to support the responses provided.Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development
and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas,
flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences
are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and
lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose

12. statement and introduction is provided which delineates all
required criteria.--Levels of Achievement:Excellent 5 (5%) - 5
(5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow,
continuity, and clarity.
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and
conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.
Good 4 (4%) - 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow,
continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is
stated yet is brief and not descriptive.
Fair 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow,
continuity, and clarity 60–79% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is
vague or off topic.
Poor 0 (0%) - 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow,
continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time.
No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was

13. provided.Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.--Levels
of Achievement:Excellent 5 (5%) - 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
Good 4 (4%) - 4 (4%)
Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation
errors.
Fair 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and
punctuation errors.
Poor 0 (0%) - 3 (3%)
Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and
punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s
understanding.Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting—The paper follows correct
format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins,
indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text
citations, and reference list.--Levels of Achievement:Excellent
5 (5%) - 5 (5%)
Uses correct paper formatting with no errors.
Good 4 (4%) - 4 (4%)

14. Contains a few (one or two) paper formatting errors.
Fair 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (three or four) paper formatting errors.
Poor 0 (0%) - 3 (3%)