The document describes an assignment for a graduate nursing course on recommending an evidence-based practice change. Students are asked to identify an issue in their healthcare organization that could be addressed through an evidence-based practice change. They then create a PowerPoint presentation proposing this evidence-based practice change. The presentation must describe the organization, current problem, proposed solution supported by evidence, plan for implementation, expected outcomes, and lessons learned from critically appraising evidence on the topic. Evaluation criteria are provided to assess the presentation.

1. NURS 6052 Capella University Recommending an Evidence Based Practice
Change PPT
NURS 6052 Capella University Recommending an Evidence Based Practice Change
PPTNURS 6052 Capella University Recommending an Evidence Based Practice Change
PPTCLICK HERE TO ORDER YOUR ASSIGNMENTThe collection of evidence is an activity that
occurs with an endgame in mind. For example, law enforcement professionals collect
evidence to a decision to charge those accused of criminal activity. Similarly, evidence-
based healthcare practitioners collect evidence to decisions in pursuit of specific
healthcare outcomes.In this Assignment, you will identify an issue or opportunity for
change within your healthcare organization and propose an idea for a change in practice
ed by an EBP approach. NURS 6052 Capella University Recommending an Evidence Based
Practice Change PPTTo Prepare:Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you critically
appraised in Module 4, related to your clinical topic of interest and PICOT.Reflect on your
current healthcare organization and think about potential opportunities for evidence-based
change, using your topic of interest and PICOT as the basis for your reflection.The
Assignment: (Evidence-Based Project)Part 5: Recommending an Evidence-Based Practice
ChangeCreate an 8- to 9-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the
following:Briefly describe your healthcare organization, including its culture and readiness
for change. (You may opt to keep various elements of this anonymous, such as your
company name.)Describe the current problem or opportunity for change. Include in this
description the circumstances surrounding the need for change, the scope of the issue, the
stakeholders involved, and the risks associated with change implementation in
general.Propose an evidence-based idea for a change in practice using an EBP approach to
decision making. Note that you may find further research needs to be conducted if sufficient
evidence is not discovered.Describe your plan for knowledge transfer of this change,
including knowledge creation, dissemination, and organizational adoption and
implementation.Describe the measurable outcomes you hope to achieve with the
implementation of this evidence-based change.Be sure to provide APA citations of the ing
evidence-based peer reviewed articles you selected to your thinking.Add a lessons learned
section that includes the following:A summary of the critical appraisal of the peer-reviewed
articles you previously submittedAn explanation about what you learned from completing
the Evaluation Table within the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template (1-3
slides)Module05_Week09_Assignment_RubricPART 5: RECOMMENDING AN EVIDENCE-

2. BASED PRACTICE CHANGECREATE AN 8- TO 9-SLIDE POWERPOINT PRESENTATION IN
WHICH YOU DO THE FOLLOWING:· BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR HEALTHCARE
ORGANIZATION, INCLUDING ITS CULTURE AND READINESS FOR CHANGE.· DESCRIBE THE
CURRENT PROBLEM OR OPPORTUNITY FOR CHANGE. INCLUDE IN THIS DESCRIPTION
THE CIRCUMSTANCES SURROUNDING THE NEED FOR CHANGE, THE SCOPE OF THE ISSUE,
THE STAKEHOLDERS INVOLVED, AND THE RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH CHANGE
IMPLEMENTATION IN GENERAL.—Excellent 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)The presentation clearly
and accurately describes in detail a healthcare organization, including a detailed
explanation of its culture and readiness for change.The presentation clearly and accurately
describes in detail a current problem or opportunity for change.An accurate, specific, and
detailed description of the circumstances surrounding the need for change, the scope of the
issue, the stakeholders involved, and the risks associated with change implementation in
general is provided.Good 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)The presentation accurately describes a
healthcare organization, including an accurate explanation of its culture and readiness for
change.The presentation accurately describes a current problem or opportunity for
change.An accurate description of the circumstances surrounding the need for change, the
scope of the issue, the stakeholders involved, and the risks associated with the change
implementation in general is provided.Fair 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)The presentation
inaccurately or vaguely describes a healthcare organization, including an inaccurate or
vague explanation of its culture and readiness for change.The presentation inaccurately or
vaguely describes a current problem or opportunity for change.An inaccurate or vague
description of the circumstances surrounding the need for change, the scope of the issue,
the stakeholders involved, and the risks associated with the change implementation in
general is provided.Poor 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)The presentation inaccurately and vaguely
describes a healthcare organization, including an inaccurate and vague explanation of its
culture and readiness for change, or is missing.The presentation inaccurately and vaguely
describes a current problem or opportunity for change or is missing.An inaccurate and
vague description of the circumstances surrounding the need for change, the scope of the
issue, the stakeholders involved, and the risks associated with the change implementation
in general is provided or is missing.· PROPOSE AN EVIDENCE-BASED IDEA FOR A CHANGE
IN PRACTICE USING AN EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE APPROACH TO DECISION MAKING.
NOTE THAT YOU MAY FIND FURTHER RESEARCH NEEDS TO BE CONDUCTED IF
SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE IS NOT DISCOVERED.· DESCRIBE YOUR PLAN FOR KNOWLEDGE
TRANSFER OF THIS CHANGE, INCLUDING KNOWLEDGE CREATION, DISSEMINATION, AND
ORGANIZATIONAL ADOPTION AND IMPLEMENTATION.· DESCRIBE THE MEASURABLE
OUTCOMES YOU HOPE TO ACHIEVE WITH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS EVIDENCE-
BASED CHANGE.· BE SURE TO PROVIDE APA CITATIONS OF THE ING EVIDENCE-BASED
PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLES YOU SELECTED TO YOUR THINKING.—Excellent 32 (32%) –
35 (35%)The presentation clearly and accurately proposes in detail an evidence-based idea
for a change in practice that is fully aligned to an evidence-based practice approach for
decision making.The presentation clearly and accurately describes in detail a plan for
knowledge transfer of this change, including a detailed plan for knowledge creation,
dissemination, and organizational adoption and implementation that is specific.The

3. presentation clearly and accurately describes in detail the measurable outcomes desired for
the implementation of the evidence-based change.The presentation includes accurate,
complete, and full APA citations of the ing evidence-based peer-reviewed articles
selected.Good 28 (28%) – 31 (31%)The presentation accurately proposes an evidence-
based idea for a change in practice that is adequately aligned to an evidence-based practice
approach for decision making.The presentation accurately describes a plan for knowledge
transfer of this change, including a plan for knowledge creation, dissemination, and
organizational adoption and implementation that is adequate.The presentation accurately
describes the measurable outcomes desired for the implementation of the evidence-based
changes.The presentation includes accurate APA citations of the ing evidence-based peer-
reviewed articles selected.Fair 25 (25%) – 27 (27%)The presentation inaccurately or
vaguely proposes an evidence-based idea for a change in practice that may be aligned to an
evidence-based practice approach for decision making.The presentation inaccurately or
vaguely describes a plan for knowledge transfer of this change, including a plan for
knowledge creation, dissemination, and organizational adoption and implementation that
may be relevant.The presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes the measurable
outcomes desired for the implementation of the evidence-based change.Inaccurate and
incomplete APA citations of the ing evidence-based peer-reviewed articles selected are
provided.Poor 0 (0%) – 24 (24%)The presentation inaccurately and vaguely proposes an
evidence-based idea for a change in practice that is not aligned to an evidence-based
practice approach for decision making or is missing.The presentation inaccurately and
vaguely describes a plan for knowledge transfer of this change, including a plan for
knowledge creation, dissemination, and organizational adoption that implementation that is
incomplete, or is missing.The presentation inaccurately and vaguely describes the
measurable outcomes desired for the implementation of the evidence-based change or is
missing.Inaccurate and incomplete APA citations of the ing evidence-based peer-reviewed
articles selected are provided or are missing.ADD A LESSONS LEARNED SECTION THAT
INCLUDES:· A SUMMARY OF THE CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF THE PEER-REVIEWED
ARTICLES YOU PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED.· WHAT DID YOU LEARN FROM COMPLETING
THE EVALUATION TABLE?—Excellent 27 (27%) – 30 (30%)The presentation clearly and
accurately summarizes in detail the critical appraisal process of the peer-reviewed articles
previously submitted.The presentation thoroughly describes in detail at least one lesson
learned from completing the evaluation table that is specific.The presentation thoroughly
describes in detail at least one lesson learned from completing the levels of evidence table
that is specific.The presentation thoroughly describes in detail at least one lesson learned
from completing the outcomes synthesis table that is specific.The presentation provides a
complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of two outside resources reviewed on the lessons
learned explained. The presentation fully integrates at least two outside resources and two
or three course-specific resources that fully the presentation.Good 24 (24%) –
26 (26%)The presentation accurately summarizes the critical appraisal process of the peer-
reviewed articles previously submitted.The presentation accurately describes at least one
lesson learned from completing the evaluation table that may include some specificity.The
presentation accurately describes at least one lesson learned from completing the levels of

4. evidence table that may include some specificity.The presentation accurately describes at
least one lesson learned from completing the outcomes synthesis table that may include
some specificity.The presentation provides an accurate synthesis of at least one outside
resource reviewed related to the lessons learned explained. The presentation integrates at
least one outside resource and two or three course-specific resources that may the
presentation.Fair 21 (21%) – 23 (23%)The presentation inaccurately or vaguely
summarizes the critical appraisal process of the peer-reviewed articles previously
submitted.The presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes at least one lesson learned
from completing the evaluation table and may lack some specificity.The presentation
inaccurately or vaguely describes at least one lesson learned from completing the levels of
evidence table and may lack some specificity.The presentation inaccurately or vaguely
describes at least one lesson learned from completing the outcomes synthesis table and
may lack some specificity.The presentation provides a vague or inaccurate synthesis of
outside resources reviewed related to the lessons learned explained. The response
minimally integrates resources that may the presentation.Poor 0 (0%) – 20 (20%)The
presentation inaccurately and vaguely summarizes the critical appraisal process of the
peer-reviewed articles previously submitted or is missing.The presentation inaccurately
and vaguely describes at least one lesson learned from completing the evaluation table and
lacks specificity or is missing.The presentation inaccurately and vaguely describes at least
one lesson learned from completing the levels of evidence table that lacks specificity or is
missing.The presentation inaccurately and vaguely describes at least one lesson learned
from completing the outcomes synthesis table that lacks specificity or is missing.The
presentation provides a vague and inaccurate synthesis of no outside resources related to
the lessons learned explained or is missing. The presentation fails to incorporate any
resources to the responses provided.WRITTEN EXPRESSION AND FORMATTING—
PARAGRAPH DEVELOPMENT AND ORGANIZATION:PARAGRAPHS MAKE CLEAR POINTS
THAT WELL-DEVELOPED IDEAS, FLOW LOGICALLY, AND DEMONSTRATE CONTINUITY
OF IDEAS. SENTENCES ARE CAREFULLY FOCUSED—NEITHER LONG AND RAMBLING NOR
SHORT AND LACKING SUBSTANCE. A CLEAR AND COMPREHENSIVE PURPOSE
STATEMENT AND INTRODUCTION IS PROVIDED WHICH DELINEATES ALL REQUIRED
CRITERIA.—Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards
for flow, continuity, and clarity.A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction,
and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.Good 4 (4%) –
4 (4%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity
80% of the time.Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated yet is
brief and not descriptive.Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow
writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60–79% of the time.Purpose,
introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.Poor 0 (0%) –
3 (3%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity
less than 60% of the time.No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was
provided.WRITTEN EXPRESSION AND FORMATTING—ENGLISH WRITING STANDARDS:
CORRECT GRAMMAR, MECHANICS, AND PROPER PUNCTUATION.—Excellent 5 (5%) –
5 (5%)Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.Good 4 (4%) –

5. 4 (4%)Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation
errors.Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and
punctuation errors.Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling,
and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.WRITTEN
EXPRESSION AND FORMATTING—THE PAPER FOLLOWS CORRECT FORMAT FOR TITLE
PAGE, HEADINGS, FONT, SPACING, MARGINS, INDENTATIONS, PAGE NUMBERS, RUNNING
HEAD, PARENTHETICAL/IN-TEXT CITATIONS, AND REFERENCE LIST.—Excellent 5 (5%) –
5 (5%)Uses correct paper formatting with no errors.Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Contains a few
(one or two) paper formatting errors.Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Contains several (three or
four) paper formatting errors.Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Contains many (five or more) paper
formatting
errors.part_4b_critical_appraisal_of_research__1_.docxpart_4a_critical_appraisal_of_research
_2complete__1_.doc