What is Knowledge? Essay Essay on Theory Of Knowledge Theory of Knowledge Essay Theory of Knowledge Tok Essay The Theory of Knowledge

1. What is Knowledge? Essay
Where does knowledge begin? The creation and acquisition of knowledge is a difficult and
complex topic to grasp. Is it an innate process we are born with or an ability that is learned and
acquired through experience? My opinion of knowledge has varied tremendously through out years
of exposure from an uneducated regurgitation of subject matter discussed in a room of four white
walls and pretentious brats to an understanding of nontraditional, analytic insight gained from a vast
exposure to dissimilar cultures and strong models.
Throughout our life stages, many things become clear and broadened with maturity and the tenacity
to conquer that unfamiliarity through risk taking. These experiences and other relationships have
...show more content...
Information like that described by Lilia, ."..there was a pattern where they put me in those really
basic classes for five years. I guess there was a pattern where they put me in those really basic
classes and then decided I would go through my elementary school years in those classes. I didn't
learn to read or write" (19). Lilia's language and culture barrier were never addressed by the
administration but through her desire to learn.
Like that of Lilia, bell also held a reverence about her background and its short comings, "No
wonder our working class parents from poor backgrounds feared our entry into such a world,
intuiting perhaps that we might learn to be ashamed of where we had come from, that we might
never return home, or come back only to lord it over them" (24). It was clear throughout the journey
that even with advanced education; a student is deprived of their cultural knowledge. There is
mention of her feelings of frustration to express insight about the contorted beliefs. However, her
feelings lay dormant throughout her time at Stanford. It is those suppressed feelings that guided her
achievements.
Lilia's experience of perseverance gained through hardships and doubt, has led me to feel more
inspired to believe in my actions and to be more tenacious in achieving my goals. Coming from a
single–parent home, I have overcome many obstacles and statistics. The rigidity that the military
brought onto me had given me feelings of desperation
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

2. Essay on Theory Of Knowledge
Theory Of Knowledge In today's society, science is regarded as being the most trusted form of
knowledge, leading to many claiming it to be the supreme form of knowledge. To investigate
whether or not this is justified we must compare science to other forms/areas of knowledge and
consider what they each contribute. The strongest argument science has to claim this title, is the
objectivity and empirical nature of its method and in particular its verifying processes; mainly based
on inductive and deductive reasoning. Modern science is closely related to inductive reasoning and
is presented as a distinctive feature of scientific activity today. Induction works by verification:
correspondence...show more content...
The most prolific of these adapted verification processes are the Hypothetico deductive model, a
modern formulation associated with famous scientists such as Popper and Hemple. It works by
using a combination of both verification techniques, claiming that what distinguishes scientific
hypothesis from a non–scientific hypothesis is not its origin, but the formers capacity to stand up to
testing. The name comes from the claim that the starting point is the hypothesis, from which we can
predict that particular events will occur under particular circumstances. This prediction is a
deduction from the initial hypothesis, and if events occur as predicted then the hypothesis is
confirmed. Confirmation of the hypothesis is inductive, simply because if the hypothesis holds true
x number of times, we claim that it always will hold true. This confirmation of the hypothesis
process is the part of the model that encompasses inductive reasoning, as when using this method one
only has access to a limited number of events. Although the Hypothetico model was developed to
incorporate advantages of both types of verifications, by using inductive reasoning as confirmation
processes, it is still affected by the fundamental flaws of inductivism and basic criticism of the
original scientific model. Questions such as, Why is it legitimate to assume that things will continue
to behave as they always
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

3. Theory of Knowledge Essay
Knowledge can be gained and interpreted in many different ways. It all depends on how people
prioritize different ways of knowing and how they perceive what knowledge is. This has led to the
question, Does knowledge consist solely of proven facts and information that can be organized in a
coherent manner, or is knowledge deeper, depending not only on facts, but also on interpretation
stemming from individual experiences? The question is, are facts alone enough to constitute
knowledge or do those facts need to be interpreted under guidance of personal experiences in order
to gain knowledge. In two areas of knowledge that have a large role in my life, natural science and
religion, I can see both sides to the argument.
There are many times that I agree with the statement that "knowledge is nothing more than the
systematic organization of facts." Facts are, as Eugenie Carol Scott states in her book Evolution vs.
Creationism, "confirmed observations" that can be disproven upon further study (Scott 12). When
facts are systematically organized, meaning they are put in a certain order for a specific reason, in a
way that allows each piece of information to support the previous information, a coherent synthesis
of knowledge is able to be gained. In the natural sciences, this organization of facts is almost entirely
logic based. Scientists have to examine what they know and draw conclusions by piecing together
facts that make sense. Scientists cannot change the knowledge they have due
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

4. Theory of Knowledge
TOK
Nature of sense perception
Q1A) In what ways does the biological constitution of a living organism determine, influence or limit
its sense perception? B) If humans are sensitive only to certain ranges of stimuli, what consequences
or limitations might this have for the acquisition of knowledge?
Ans–A– The biological constitution of a living organism has a mammoth influence on the sense
perception of an organism. The biological institution of an organism can even enhance or degrade
the level, degree and method of sense perception by an organism. Take the Homo sapiens or rather
humans for example the relatively strong eyesight causes the overdependence on eyesight and eyes
and the other senses are therefore held in less importance and...show more content...
This abstruseness is of human nature, can that really be based on familiarity when does one really
become seriously familiar with ones surroundings??
Q3) Is the nature of sense perception such that, as Huxley suggests, sensations are essentially private
and incommunicable?
Ans– Firstly I can give no definite answer towards this query for I have no idea by which Huxley
based something as definable as to be a symbol. Though by symbol I define that as something as
perhaps as an object or book perhaps. Though he says that it is "incommunicable" at second hand
so that means one may express ones own sensations perceptions etc through symbols but for it to
be able to be directly expressed seems like a colossal/herculean or rather impossible task. The
symbols meant by Huxley may be something by which represents an specific inclination towards
something individual may express oneself perhaps an article of specific clothing support towards
for example a band. Sensations an individual owns are I believe essentially private but I believe
can be communicable. An example of this can be taken in the very context of TOK which
essentially teaches us to broaden our horizons and in many cases we have to describe our own
perceptions. The world is rather made up
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

5. Tok Essay
"The Possession Of Knowledge Carries An Ethical Responsibility." Evaluate This Claim.–Seo Yeon
Choi–
Theory of Knowledge Essay
Topic: "The Possession of Knowledge Carries an Ethical Responsibility" Evaluate The Claim.
School: Auckland International College School Number: 001495 Candidate Name: Seo Yeon Choi
Candidate Number: 001495–010 Session: May 2013 Teacher: Beate Wiebel Word Count: 1480
"The Possession Of Knowledge Carries An Ethical Responsibility." Evaluate This Claim.–Seo Yeon
Choi–
After reading the claim, „The possession of knowledge carries an ethical responsibility‟, I
first thought what does „ethical responsibility‟ means. Considering that ethics is the study that
debates what is right or wrong and thus govern...show more content...
In my case, when I heard my neighbour having huge fights every day, I decided to not call the
police or go over and ask if they are fine because I thought my actions might bring bigger rage. In my
point of view, the thought of helping my neighbours seemed like I was intruding their privacy.
However, on the other hand, in others' point of view, they might think that as long as they have that
knowledge, it is their rightful duty to help their neighbours. Let‟s look at another example about
euthanasia, which explains the knowledge issue above using human science as one of the areas of
knowledge and reason and emotion as ways of knowing. Euthanasia is a serious problem around the
world and many people are aware of it as well. However, even if many people know that it is
unethical to administer euthanasia, having that knowledge does
3
"The Possession Of Knowledge Carries An Ethical Responsibility." Evaluate This Claim.–Seo Yeon
Choi–
not give them the right to stop those who do so. The reason for this is mainly because those who
carry out euthanasia may have reasonable excuses such as, financial problems in maintaining
hospital fees, psychological problems in watching beloved ones suffer, or even the patient might
want to administer euthanasia in order to end his or her suffering. Hence, it can be seen that
although some might think that having certain knowledge brings
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

6. The Theory of Knowledge
"That which is accepted as knowledge today is sometimes discarded tomorrow."
We live in a strange and puzzling world. Despite the exponential growth of knowledge in the past
century, we are faced by a baffling multitude of conflicting ideas. The mass of conflicting ideas
causes the replacement of knowledge, as one that was previously believed to be true gets replace
by new idea. This is accelerated by the rapid development of technology to allow new
investigations into knowledge within the areas of human and natural sciences. Knowledge in the
human sciences has been replaced for decades as new discoveries by the increased study of
humans, and travel has caused the discarding of a vast array of theories. The development of...show
more content...
By looking up at the sky at night Olber wondered why the sky is dark if the number of stars was
infinite. Using his sense perception and reason, Olber was able to deduce that Newton's model must
have been wrong if the sky got dark at night.
On the contrary, as the natural sciences being largely based on the perceptions of our
environment as well as reasoning, our perception can sometimes deceive us, but is also selective
and can be distorted by our beliefs and prejudices. Olber's observation of the night sky gave him
the evidence that there were a finite number of stars, with only observation there is an uncertainty
to the accuracy of the paradox and whether this was only true with the way Olber perceived it.
Due to the possibility of assumptions in reasoning, for example, using inductive reasoning to
explain the darkness of the sky everywhere, by assuming that because the sky is dark at night on
Earth it must be so everywhere. However inductive reasoning is flawed as it assumes the observed
to be the all the unobserved, and we are therefore making hasty generalisations on the basis of
insufficient evidence. How can we know whether Olber's paradox was not simply due to other
unexplained phenomena in physics?
On the other hand, we cannot know whether Olber's paradox was due to other unexplained
phenomena of physics and must therefore require the development of knew knowledge to disprove
it. The knowledge shown to be wrong by Olber however was
Get more content on HelpWriting.net