1. Moral Dilemma Essay
Moral Dilemma
As human beings, we are forced to accept the inevitability of being unwillingly confronted with
situations that test the strength of our morality and character. In the midst of deep moral conflict we
become immensely introspective and we follow our intuition with the hopes of it guiding us towards
the morally correct decision. However, how can we be sure that we have acted morally in a situation
that is so morbid and perverse that our intuition is completely torn? This is the dilemma that is faced
by the mother who is given a terrible choice by a Nazi officer: either the officer will kill all three of
her children, or the mother must kill one in order preserve the lives of the other two. In this situation,
...show more content...
The answer lies in the unique context of the dilemma.
Traditional moral theory, which is not regarded as "gender–neutral" by many feminist philosophers,
stipulates that a moral decision can reached by rational calculation and that emotion interferes with
reaching a truly rational, and thereby moral, conclusion. By this standard, women should be seen as
deficient in their method of moral deliberation. Kantian and Utilitarian ethics share the general
premise that the application of a general principle to any situation, no matter what the context, allows
for the achievement of a moral decision. Although Utilitarianism does directs us as to which
emotions we should cultivate, the actions we should take to achieve them are solely a matter of
rational calculation.
It seems as though both theories are designed to operate in an ideal world in which it is necessary
that everyone consider them categorically, as opposed to hypothetically. However, this world is by
no means ideal, and those of us who exist in it recognize the inherent danger in applying an abstract
principle to every particular situation we encounter. These theories fail to recognize us as practical
human beings that have feelings and emotional ties to those around us.
In seeing the problem of ethics as a problem of reconciling the interests of the self with what would
be right or best for "everyone",
Get more content on HelpWriting.net
2. Moral Dilemmas
Moral Dilemmas Moral Dilemmas Introduction Moral dilemmas are situations, which cause
conflicts, and the decision made, can breach one or another principle or claim. The action taken
by the subject can be something wrong or something undermining another option. Dilemmas
cause conflicts where the subject has to settle on the appropriate action to be followed for certain
options available; hence unable to decide the course of action to pursue. They are moral
dilemmas because they conflict with ethics, beliefs and sometimes the law; and also because of
how we judge them whether they are right or wrong. Ethics are used as guidelines in situations of
moral dilemma to suggest what is wrong and right. Moral dilemmas have competing rights
including justice, freedom and different legal rights. The right versus right model can be used
because, it presents genuine dilemmas from both sides; these dilemmas are rooted to core values.
Right versus right provides dilemmas which are ethical compared to right versus wrong. It also
gives a number of options to choose from in making a decision. These choices include different
models; truth versus loyalty, justice versus mercy, short term versus long term considerations and
comparing the needs of an individual versus community or organization. This model has the
advantage of abiding in the law and while abiding in duty. This model recognizes the welfare of
others because it works in mutuality concern of social relations. Diverse
Get more content on HelpWriting.net
3. Whistleblower Ethical Dilemmas
1.0 Introduction
According to (Williams, 2015), a moral dilemma is a conflict in which a person have to choose
between two or more actions and have moral reasons for choosing each action. A whistleblower can
be anyone who has and can report insider knowledge of illegal activities that are happening in an
organization. Therefore we can also say that whistleblowers can be supplier, client, contractor or an
employee who somehow becomes aware of illegal activities that are happening in a business either
through being told about it or witnessing the behavior. The alleged information of wrongdoing can
be grouped in many ways, law, regulation, violation of company policy/rules, fraud, corruption as
well as threat to public interest/national security (Vandekerckhove, 2006).
2.0 Types of Whistleblowers in School and in the Work Place
2.1 Internal Whistleblower
In most cases whistleblowers are internal whistleblowers, which report on misconduct that happen
within the company done by fellow employee or superior. Interesting questions with respect to
internal whistleblowers is, under what circumstances a person will act on to spot and to stop illegal,
unacceptable behavior and report it. If there are complaint systems within the organization that offer
not just option to dedicated through plan and control organization but option for absolute
confidentiality then people will find a reason to take action with respect to unacceptable behavior
within an organization (Rowe and Hall,
Get more content on HelpWriting.net
4. Moral Dilemma Essay
A moral dilemma is to be placed in a situation which involves conflicts between moral
requirements. These situations have a very apparent conflict between moral imperatives such that
obeying one will result in transgressing the other. This paper will demonstrate choices, tragedy,
respect, individuality, and values in the following stories: The Moose and The Sparrow by Hugh
Garner, The Yellow Sweater by Hugh Garner, The Necklace by Guy de Maupassant, The Painted
Door by Sinclair Ross, and David by Earle Birney A choice is something one must make frequently
throughout each and every day of ones lifetime. Some choices may be easier to make than others.
One must choose to get out of bed each morning, what someone wants to eat or drink,...show more
content...
If Mathilde Loisel chose to tell Mme. Forester that she lost the necklace in the first place, Mme.
and M. Loisel wouldn't have faced as many hardships to replace the necklace. This reflects back to
honesty being the best policy. In the story "The Painted Door" John chose to leave Ann at home
with a snow storm on its way so that he could walk five miles to his fathers house to make sure he
would be warm and to help with the chores. John knew that Ann would be lonely, so he also chose
to walk an extra two miles to Steven's home to ask if he could keep Ann company until John
returned home. Ann chose to commit adultery. She loved John, she is dedicated to him, but she felt
neglected by him and was in desperate need for love and comfort. She chose to let Steven to ease her
emotions by taking advantage of her situation. Ann decided not to stay faithful to John, but to give
into her desires and sleep with Steven. "She who now felt his air of appraisal as nothing more than
an understanding of the unfulfilled woman that until this moment had lain within her brooding and
unedited, reproved out of consciousness by the insistence of an outgrown, routine fidelity." (page6
lines 14–17) John chose to venture back home in the storm, and when he got home it was the
middle of the night. He saw Steven and Ann lying together, sleeping side by side in bed and from
there, John chose to go back out into the storm. John chose his fate
Get more content on HelpWriting.net
5. Ethical Dilemma Essay
An ethical dilemma is an incident that causes us to question how we should react based on our
beliefs. A decision needs to be made between right and wrong. I have experienced many ethical
dilemmas in my lifetime, so I know that there is no such thing as an ethical dilemma that only
affects one person. I also know that some ethical dilemmas are easier to resolve than others are.
The easy ones are the ones in which we can make decisions on the spot. For example, if a cashier
gives me too much change, I can immediately make a decision to either return the money or keep it.
Based on Kant's, categorical imperative there are two criteria for determining moral right and wrong.
First, there is universalizability, which states, "the person's...show more content...
My moral character was being tested and because it could have a negative effect on other people's
lives, I wrestled with my own beliefs. I needed a 2 plan that worked best for all involved, and one
that would not cause me to compromise my morals. I will discuss the dilemma, how it affected me,
and how I made a decision I could live with.
In my profession as a technology consultant one of my responsibilities were to work with the sales
team to assist in the architecture of Information Technology solutions to solve customer
problems. I worked with the salespeople throughout the sales process to ensure that customers
purchased all products necessary for a successful implementation. One of my responsibilities was
to make a final review of sales quotes to verify no mistakes were made. When I traveled outside of
my territory to work with customers, the sales quotes were reviewed by consultants from that
area. The dilemma occurred at a customer site outside of my territory. I had never met the
salesperson or the customer. The only information I had was a scope of work for the
implementation. When I arrived at the customer site, I was given a copy of the purchase order and
directed to the computer room. I performed an inventory to verify that all products on the purchase
order were onsite. As I reviewed the scope of work, I noticed there were quite a few items on the
purchase order that were not necessary for this implementation. To
Get more content on HelpWriting.net
6. Essay on Moral Dilemma
Moral Dilemma
Everyday we are tested as individuals to make the right choice. How we view ourselves as
individuals and how others view us are directly correlated to our moral decision–making. But morals
are somewhat misleading. What might be a wrong decision for one person might be a solution to
another. So how do we define morals? Do we follow Gods' moral rules because to do so would
increase out likelihood of obtaining salvation in the afterlife? Or is it simpler than that. Is God
going to deny our entrance into heaven because we have run a stop sign here and there? No. I
believe our moral values are much simpler than that. I believe that our moral decision–making comes
from our upbringing of what is right or wrong. Our parents and...show more content...
It was about 13 degrees out and the sun had just started to peek over the mountains behind our
house. It was a magnificent morning. It was one of those crisp, cold mornings with no wind and I
could hear for miles and miles. I remember hearing my neighbor's dog, Orvis, barking two miles
away. I kept walking for about a quarter mile until I came upon a field that was always a hot spot
for deer in the morning. It was an exciting feeling to be out in the woods with the deer, yet at the
same time, a terrifying feeling. Was I going to fail yet another year of not bagging my buck? I was
anxious as to what my family and friends would think of me. I needed to get a deer in the worst way.
As the morning wore on I began to get anxious and fidgety feeling that no deer were going to
come. As I was contemplating whether to leave my stand in the field, I recognized two deer
grazing peacefully in the middle of the field. I quickly pulled up and looked through my scope
and saw nothing but green fuzz. I was so nervous that I had forgotten to readjust the focus on my
scope. As I did, the deer saw me move and began to trot away from me and into the protection of
the forest. I managed to get my scope in focus in time to see that there was a buck and a doe. My
chance had finally come. I was going to get my first Vermont buck. I immediately stood up from
my stand and jogged over to where they had entered the woods. Once in the woods, I evaluated the
surroundings and had a good
Get more content on HelpWriting.net