Ultrasound triggered release of anticancer agents from alginate chitosan hydrogels
1. ULTRASOUND TRIGGERED RELEASE OF
ANTICANCER AGENTS FROM ALGINATE-CHITOSAN
HYDROGELS
MSc. Antonio Di Martino, Ph.D.
dimartino@utb.cz / dimartino@tpu.ru
MSDT 2017, 1-3 November 2017, Tomsk
2. Triggered Drug Delivery
Advanced drug delivery systems (DDS) enhance efficacy of different therapeutics in a dosage, spatial, and/or
temporal way
Numerous chemical, physical and biological-based stimuli-responsive formulations or devices for
controlled drug release have been developed
Theranostics 2013; 3(3):141-151
3. Physical stimuli for local drug delivery
X-Rays
Good penetration
Precise
Easily tuned
High cost
Ionizing radiation
Magnetic field
Localized accumulation
Energy modulation
Accumulation – embolism, increased cytotoxicity
Light
Precise
Low cost
Easily tuned
Limited tissue penetration (can be enhanced
with NIR light) Invasive for deep zone
Ultrasound
Good penetration (Dependent on frequency)
Easily tuned
Low cost
Difficulty to target moving organs
Not homogeneous exposure of large zones
Radiofrequency Invasive, temperature gradient from the heated zone Easily tuned
4. Ultrasounds –general definition
-Ultrasounds are mechanical longitudinal waves propagating in a medium through changes in pressure-
Ultrasound technology is already well implanted in the medical field
Frequency modulation of the depth of penetration and spatial resolution
Intensity amount of energy delivered at the target site
Focused
Not focused
diagnosis (ultrasound imaging)
therapeutic
More interesting in drug delivery – large amount of energy in a small area
Physical therapy
6. US-therapeutic
“any type of procedure that uses ultrasound for therapeutic benefit”
Applied Physics Letters 106(2):021902 · January 2015
http://www.trust-biosonics.com/technology/1
Ultrasound probe
Blood vessel
4. Local nanoparticle
delivery
3. Targeted sonoporation at
the region of interest
2. Microbubbles and nanoparticles reach
target tissue
1. IV injection of microbubbles
and nanoparticles
Microbubble Nanoparticle
Microbubble
undergoing inertial
cavitation
Therapeutic
ultrasound
7. c
US in Drug Delivery
US-induced effects
Thermal
Mechanical
Acoustic radiation
forces
Journal of Controlled Release 241 (2016) 144-163
Theranostics 2014; 4(4):432-444.
8. Drug Delivery Carriers designed for use with US
Using carriers prevents premature and extraneous delivery of the drug
Control the release, reduction of burst
Targeting
Nano or Micro-carrier in solid or liquid form
Combination of gas-liquid form ( lipospheres = hybrid between liposomes and microbubbles)
Low sensibility to US
http://www.dataphysics.de
Liposomes
Micelles
http://www.fbs.leeds.ac.uk
Solid Lipid Nanoparticles
Di Martino et al, International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 526,2017,380-390
Hybrid-NPs
9. Highly adsorbent, are able to swell in water or in a biological fluid while conserving their shape
Swelling behavior is related to the Mw and nature of the polymer(s) used
Unique properties such as flexibility, low interfacial energy with water,
highly charged structure in water
Biocompatible materials, because of their high water content, their composition
and their mechanical behaviour which is close to that for an extracellular matrix
of natural origin
Conventional hydrogels are not sensitive to changes in the environment, as opposed to stimuli-responsive
hydrogels which can sense an external stimulus
Hydrogels
http://dev.nsta.org
10. Stimuli responsive hydrogels
Stimuli-responsive hydrogels are based on smart polymers
Ability to respond to small changes in the surrounding environment by changes in volume, swelling or
shrinking
Slight variations in parameters (pressure, temperature, concentration, solvent, etc...) induce considerable
modifications of the physical and chemical properties of the macromolecules (solubility, structure, shape,
size)
Soft Matter, 2011,7, 4414-4424
11. Development of biopolymer hydrogel beads for multidrug encapsulation
Control the release of the drugs, individually
Deliver drugs at the right place and the right time
Trigger the release by application of US = pulsatile release
No constant release over time = more effective
Control the biodegradation rate
Self-healing
Aims
12. Hydrogel-mbead : preparation
Alginic acid
Chitosan
Doxorubicin Temozolomide
+
• 100 mm average diameter
• Drug loading does not affect dimension
13. Multiple Drug Loading
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.25 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 5 10
Drug conc. mg/ml
EncapsulationEfficiency(%)
Individual
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.25 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 5 10
Drug conc. mg/ml
EncapsulationEfficiency(%)
Encapsulation
Holding
Weight ratio between drugs
Multiple
Chitosan to Alginic acid weight ratio : 2
pH 5
Temp : 22-25ﹾC
14. Release investigation
Simulated body fluids
pH 2-7.4 T 37ﹾC
US transducer
ON/OFF
Stirrer
IN
OUT
Temp. contr.
Solution
Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 16 (2009) 41–49
15. Improve TMZ stability
Control
6h
24h
Di Martino et al.Journal of Nanoparticle Research 19(2) ·2017
TMZ undergoes pH dependent ring-opening under both
acidic and alkaline conditions
Free drug
Drug loaded
Methylating agent
TMZ half life : 1.8h
MTIC half life : slight longer than TMZ
16. Individual Release
70kHz, 2W/cm2
REF
US 5x10s
US 5x30s
US every 20 minutes (ON/OFF)
Temperature is stable
pH 3
pH 5
pH 7.4
T = 37ﹾC ± 1
120 rpm oscillatory shaker
Pulsatile Release
More effective than constant release rate
17. T im e ( m in )
mgReleased
1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 7 0 8 0 9 0 1 0 0 1 1 0
0
2 5
5 0
7 5
1 0 0
1 2 5
1 5 0
1 7 5
2 0 0
T im e ( m in )
mgReleased
1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 7 0 8 0 9 0 1 0 0 1 1 0
0
2 5
5 0
7 5
1 0 0
1 2 5
1 5 0
1 7 5
2 0 0
U S 5 x 1 0 s
U S 5 x 3 0 s
U S 5 x 1 0 s
U S 5 x 3 0 s
pH 3
pH 7.4
Ref : 128 mg/mg
Tot : 233 mg/mg 5x10s
Tot : 461 mg/mg 5x30s
Ref : 211 mg/mg
Tot : 400 mg/mg 5x10s
Tot : 669 mg/mg 5x30s
650 mg/mg 720 mg/mg
Ref : 276 mg/mg
Tot : 385mg/mg 5x10s
Tot : 611 mg/mg 5x30s
Ref :338 mg/mg
Tot : 460 mg/mg 5x10s
Tot : 704 mg/mg 5x30s
Individual Release
18. Simultaneous release
mgReleased
D O X T M Z
0
1 0 0
2 0 0
3 0 0
4 0 0
5 0 0
6 0 0
7 0 0
8 0 0
R E F
U S 5 x 1 0 s
U S 5 x 3 0 s
mgReleased
D O X T M Z
0
1 0 0
2 0 0
3 0 0
4 0 0
5 0 0
6 0 0
7 0 0
8 0 0
R E F
U S 5 x1 0s
U S 5 x3 0s
mgReleased
D O X T M Z
0
1 0 0
2 0 0
3 0 0
4 0 0
5 0 0
6 0 0
7 0 0
8 0 0
R E F
U S 5 x1 0s
U S 5 x3 0s
19. In vitro degradation rate
PBS (pH 7.4)
Lysozyme human
(0.5 mg/ml)
Evaluation of the Content of reducing sugar (GPC)
Pectinase from A.Niger
(0.5 mg/ml)
Cellulase from A.Niger
(0.5 mg/ml)
T im e (d a y s )
%Degradation
0 5 1 0 1 5 2 0 2 5 3 0 3 5 4 0
0
2 0
4 0
6 0
8 0
1 0 0
E n z y m e fre e
L y s o z y m e
P e c tin a se
C ellu lase
Release time ( 2h )
Up to 80% of the loaded drugs are released
20. In vitro studies
No US treatment
No Drugs
5x10s treatment
DOX
5x10s treatment
DOX+TMZ
5x10s treatment
TMZ
MCF7NIH/3T3
Viability(%)
M C F 7 N IH 3 T 3 H E K 2 9 3
0
2 0
4 0
6 0
8 0
1 0 0
1 2 0
Flow cytometry demonstrate that US cycles does
not affect cells viability
5x10s treatment has been chose
Drug free mbead
Cells respond in a different way when short burst occurs
21. In vitro studies
The decrease in cell viability is greater when combination of US + drug is used
Three possible mechanisms
I)The release after US events create a concentration gradient across the cell membrane
promoting the transport by diffusion
II)Upregulation of endocytosys --- cells respond differently to US
III)US cause a perturbation in the cell membrane leading to the passive transport
23. • Functionalization of the carrier to control the release selectively – in
serie release
• Derivatives to tune the biodegradation rate according with the
needed
• US-hydrogel relation
Perspectives