The film is a mix of social drama and comedy. The content is presented in a satire. How did people survived the great depression of the world is being documented here. The conditions werre miserable like acute shortage of work, factory closings, labor strikes and political unrest etc. Before we go on to the answers of the given questions lets first have a quick view on the possible ehtical dilemmas of the film: The major ethical dilemmas consist whether out of poverty stealing is right or wrong and whether the replacement of labors for machines that makes the life of labors miserable is right or wrong.. However this movie glorifies the struggle of the poor rather than verifying them for stealing food to survive. By glorifying the struggle the movie takes on yet another social issue: when the poor steal to eat it is not criminal, just survival. The entire movie is spent giving specific (and comical) examples of the increasing futility of working for a living in a world where machines and assembly lines are replacing skilled laborers. Minor ones include 1) The major ethical dillema of replacaement of skilled labors over machines leads to the construct of the movie. The ethics of Modern Times is best represented in the closing scenes of the film, starting with Chaplin’s sly and explicit dance, through to the closing credits, when Chaplin and Goddard walk off into the sunrise, no scene drives it home as well as does the final scene, when they give up and move on. The dilemmas that are still remain unanswered include many such as, spying of employers on employees; in the world of progress does honesty has its place as soon as Goddard obtains money through hard work, she is arrested for prior vagrancy, thus throwing her back into vagrancy; etc. 2) Spying is a clear cut threat to privacy of individuals. Although it is necessary to make effeciecny through labor works but adopting such method is extreme autocratic that makes only employees disgust and left them to disloyal to employers. Employees need to be motivated through great leadership various incentives, attachment to the company to make best out of them. Honesty can not be left in vain in any stage of progress in world. It is a prerequiste to have best welfare of the societ as whole in fast developments in the economies that may lead to threat to welfare in general. Goddard should have not run from the prior crime as it had led her into another crime of being run away from law. Solution The film is a mix of social drama and comedy. The content is presented in a satire. How did people survived the great depression of the world is being documented here. The conditions werre miserable like acute shortage of work, factory closings, labor strikes and political unrest etc. Before we go on to the answers of the given questions lets first have a quick view on the possible ehtical dilemmas of the film: The major ethical dilemmas consist whether out of poverty stealing is right or wrong and whether the .

1. The film is a mix of social drama and comedy. The content is presented in a satire. How did
people survived the great depression of the world is being documented here. The conditions
werre miserable like acute shortage of work, factory closings, labor strikes and political unrest
etc.
Before we go on to the answers of the given questions lets first have a quick view on the possible
ehtical dilemmas of the film:
The major ethical dilemmas consist whether out of poverty stealing is right or wrong and
whether the replacement of labors for machines that makes the life of labors miserable is right or
wrong.. However this movie glorifies the struggle of the poor rather than verifying them for
stealing food to survive. By glorifying the struggle the movie takes on yet another social issue:
when the poor steal to eat it is not criminal, just survival. The entire movie is spent giving
specific (and comical) examples of the increasing futility of working for a living in a world
where machines and assembly lines are replacing skilled laborers. Minor ones include
1) The major ethical dillema of replacaement of skilled labors over machines leads to the
construct of the movie. The ethics of Modern Times is best represented in the closing scenes of
the film, starting with Chaplin’s sly and explicit dance, through to the closing credits, when
Chaplin and Goddard walk off into the sunrise, no scene drives it home as well as does the final
scene, when they give up and move on.
The dilemmas that are still remain unanswered include many such as, spying of employers on
employees; in the world of progress does honesty has its place as soon as Goddard obtains
money through hard work, she is arrested for prior vagrancy, thus throwing her back into
vagrancy; etc.
2) Spying is a clear cut threat to privacy of individuals. Although it is necessary to make
effeciecny through labor works but adopting such method is extreme autocratic that makes only
employees disgust and left them to disloyal to employers. Employees need to be motivated
through great leadership various incentives, attachment to the company to make best out of them.
Honesty can not be left in vain in any stage of progress in world. It is a prerequiste to have best
welfare of the societ as whole in fast developments in the economies that may lead to threat to
welfare in general. Goddard should have not run from the prior crime as it had led her into
another crime of being run away from law.
Solution
The film is a mix of social drama and comedy. The content is presented in a satire. How did
people survived the great depression of the world is being documented here. The conditions

2. werre miserable like acute shortage of work, factory closings, labor strikes and political unrest
etc.
Before we go on to the answers of the given questions lets first have a quick view on the possible
ehtical dilemmas of the film:
The major ethical dilemmas consist whether out of poverty stealing is right or wrong and
whether the replacement of labors for machines that makes the life of labors miserable is right or
wrong.. However this movie glorifies the struggle of the poor rather than verifying them for
stealing food to survive. By glorifying the struggle the movie takes on yet another social issue:
when the poor steal to eat it is not criminal, just survival. The entire movie is spent giving
specific (and comical) examples of the increasing futility of working for a living in a world
where machines and assembly lines are replacing skilled laborers. Minor ones include
1) The major ethical dillema of replacaement of skilled labors over machines leads to the
construct of the movie. The ethics of Modern Times is best represented in the closing scenes of
the film, starting with Chaplin’s sly and explicit dance, through to the closing credits, when
Chaplin and Goddard walk off into the sunrise, no scene drives it home as well as does the final
scene, when they give up and move on.
The dilemmas that are still remain unanswered include many such as, spying of employers on
employees; in the world of progress does honesty has its place as soon as Goddard obtains
money through hard work, she is arrested for prior vagrancy, thus throwing her back into
vagrancy; etc.
2) Spying is a clear cut threat to privacy of individuals. Although it is necessary to make
effeciecny through labor works but adopting such method is extreme autocratic that makes only
employees disgust and left them to disloyal to employers. Employees need to be motivated
through great leadership various incentives, attachment to the company to make best out of them.
Honesty can not be left in vain in any stage of progress in world. It is a prerequiste to have best
welfare of the societ as whole in fast developments in the economies that may lead to threat to
welfare in general. Goddard should have not run from the prior crime as it had led her into
another crime of being run away from law.