Transforming Data Streams with Kafka Connect: An Introduction to Single Messa...
Mc vs sl comparison
1. Comparing Feedback Mechanisms in
Sapling Learning & Mastering Chemistry.
Question:
Given a pressure and initial and final volumes, use w = -PΔV to
calculate the work done by/on a system. Convert units from
L.atm to J or kJ.
The calculation is simple, but students learning to work this
problem might make several mistakes:
1. A failure to identify and convert units
2. A mistake with the sign of the calculation.
3. A mistake in significant figures
How do the two homework systems compare in feedback and
format? Which is easier to use?
2. Avoid the straw man argument.
Any company can compare an excellent question from
their system with a weaker question from another.
Professors should consider working several comparable
problems for themselves, to really evaluate which
system is easier to use.
3. A Question in Sapling Learning
1. A screenshot of the question.
4. Sapling Learning
1. Student correctly calculates
PΔV in Lˑatm, but does not
convert to kJ. Feedback
appears within the window.
2. Let’s Try Again.
23. 16. The student correctly converts from L.atm
to Joules.
17. The student remembers to include a minus
sign, since it was an expansion.
18. Student puts in answer…
24. 19. Bizarrely, the help-menu pops back up as soon as
the student hits submit.
20. After closing the help menu, the student sees that
the question is counted correct, and difference in
significant figures is noted.
25. Conclusions
While systems may offer similar
features, Sapling’s extensive in-window
feedback provides a much less stressful, easy-to-
follow feedback mechanism.
Ultimately, students learn by working problems.
The less time students spend navigating help
menus and searching for information, the more
time they can spend working problems.