Social Agenda 23 - European Year 2010: Fighting against poverty and social exclusion ( 03/05/2010 )
Catalog N. : KE-AF-09-023-EN-C
Social Agenda 23 - European Year 2010: Fighting against poverty and social exclusion
Issue 23 of Social Agenda focuses on the 2010 European Year for combating poverty and social exclusion and on the efforts deployed to address this issue across the EU. It also takes a look at women in corporate Europe and examines the reasons why they are still underrepresented in high-level positions. And last but not least, the April edition introduces the magazine’s new layout and graphic design. It is available in English, French and German.
1. ISSN: 1682-7783
ISSUE N° 23 • April 2010
European Year 2010:
Fighting against poverty
and social exclusion
Women still underrepresented in EU boardrooms
Europe 2020: Putting Europe back on track
The European Commission’s magazine on employment and social affairs
9. Goldman Sachs calculates that, leaving the people that currently take the firms have increased their efforts to
other things equal, increasing women’s decisions inside companies, because maintain connections with women who
participation in the labour market to they are the only ones that can directly take time off to have children and then
male levels will boost GDP by 21% in influence company policy on recruit- ease them back into work. Companies
Italy, 19% in Spain, 9% in France and ment and career progression and the are even rethinking careert structures,
Germany and 8% in Britain. selection of their peers and succes- as people live and work longer.
sors. Creating a diverse culture implies Barclays is one of many firms that
But while social policies may be more a critical mass of female managers. allow five years’ unpaid leave, while
or less favourable to women’s employ- To reach this point, companies must UK retailing group John Lewis offers
ment, corporate models – historically recruit more women, promote them a six-month paid sabbatical to people
designed by men – form the pillars and train them when the labour market who have been in the company for
that keep the so-called glass ceiling does not supply enough. To be fair, the 25 years. Companies are allowing
firmly in place. The dominant model corporate world is doing ever more to people to phase their retirement.
in the business world equates leader- address the loss of female talent and Child-bearing years will thus make
ship with unfailing availability and the difficulty of combining work with up a smaller proportion of women’s
total geographical mobility, with no childcare. Many elite companies are potential working lives, so that spells
space for career breaks. It is a model rethinking their promotion practices. out of the labour force will become less
that is hard to combine with family Ernst & Young and other accountancy a mark of female exceptionalism.
life and its attendant constraints
(maternity, child-rearing, the organisa- Figure 1 - Beijing follow-up indicators
tion of family life, care of the elderly
etc.) which remain overwhelmingly the The proportion of women among the presidents/chairpersons
responsibility of women, the so-called of the highest decision-making body of the largest publicly quoted firms
“double burden”. It is little wonder on the national stock exchange
then that in a study by Eurochambres 2003* 2007 2008 2009
in six EU Member States 90% of the EU-15 average 1.0% 1.0% 1.1% 1.6%
women interviewed agreed that men EU-27 average 2.2% 2.9% 2.9% 3.0%
are in a better position to progress in
their career because women drop out The proportion of women among members of the highest decision-making
due to family constraints, and 80% body of the largest publicly quoted firms on the national stock exchange
saw motherhood as an obstacle to 2003* 2007 2008 2009
their careers. And of course one of
EU-15 average 7.0% 8.9% 9.4% 10.9%
the negative consequences of women
EU-27 average 7.8% 10.3% 10.8% 10.9%
having to adapt to male-imposed
*2003 EU-27 averages include 2004 data for CZ, LT, MT and PL
patterns in order to succeed is the
perpetuation of the very models that
constitute the most formidable obstacle Figure 2 - Gender balance amongst board members
to women’s careers. of the largest publicly listed companies, 2009
Legislation has already lowered 100%
the barriers facing women in the 90% Women Men
workplace and further developments 80%
should contribute to a continued, but 70%
gradual, breakdown of stereotypes – 60%
for example, making leave arrange-
50%
ments equally available to men and
40%
women should help to diminish the
view that early-stage child care is 30%
solely a female responsibility. 20%
10%
But the most important initiatives to 0%
LU CY PT IT MT EL EE AT BE IE TR PL ES SI FR EU-27 RO UK DE CZ HU RS HR NL LT IS MK LV BG DK SK FI SE NO
promote gender equality in business
Source: European Commission, DG EMPL, Database on women and men in decision-making.
will have to come from within – from
Social Agenda – April 2010 9
11. FREE MOVEMEnT
Free movement of
workers in the EU still
subject to restrictions
More member states removed According to the Accession Treaty,
member States do not need the
barriers labour market access Commission’s permission in order to
continue applying national measures
for workers from the new on labour market access during
the transitional period, however,
Member states in 2009 but commenting on the notifications by
the three countries, the then employ-
restrictions remain ment and social affairs Commis-
sioner Vladimir Špidla agreed that
F
ive years after the historic market access in comparison to the free the labour markets of Germany,
enlargement of the EU by ten new access granted by EU law. The overall Austria and the UK were seriously
Member States, the transitional transitional period of seven years is disturbed and recognised that
arrangements that allow the other divided into three phases (lasting two, additional inflows of EU-8 workers
Member States to temporarily restrict three and another two years respec- as a result of ending restrictions,
the access to their labour markets for tively), and different conditions apply even if small, were a valid factor
workers from these countries (except during each phase. to justify maintaining these restric-
Cyprus and Malta) have entered into tions into place. At the same time,
the third and final phase, and the Belgium and Denmark ended their he urged especially Germany and
transitional arrangements for workers restrictions on labour market access Austria to work towards the progres-
from Bulgaria and Romania into the for workers from the EU-8 Member sive opening of their labour markets
second phase. States as of the beginning of the third to EU-8 workers by 2011.
and final phase on 1 May 2009, thus
To recall, free movement of workers bringing the number of Member States With the beginning of the second
was gradually introduced in the six where EU-8 workers now enjoy the phase of the transitional arrange-
original member States of the European complete right of free movement to ments for workers from Bulgaria and
Economic Community between 1958 12 (out of 15). Romania on 1 January 2009, Spain,
and 1968, but temporary restric- Greece, Portugal and Hungary decided
tions applied for workers from The remaining three member States to end restrictions on labour market
Greece, Portugal and Spain when - Germany, Austria and the United access. As Denmark decided to do the
these countries joined the Union in the Kingdom - on the other hand, notified same from 1 May 2009, Bulgarian
1980s. With the last two EU enlarge- the Commission in April 2009 of serious and Romanian workers now enjoy full
ments, Member States were again disturbances occurring on their labour free movement rights under EU law in
given the possibility to restrict access markets, and therefore according to the a total of 14 out of 25 Member States.
to their labour markets for a maximum terms of the Accession Treaty national In the Czech Republic they do not
of seven years after accession. During law on labour market access continues need to apply for a work permit but in
this period, Member States may ask to apply after 1 May 2009, until the remaining ten Member States that
workers from eight of the ten countries 30 April 2011 at the latest. In Germany continue to restrict the labour market
that joined the EU in 2004 (“EU-8”) and and Austria this means that EU-8 access of workers from Bulgaria and
from Bulgaria and Romania (“EU-2”), workers need a work permit, while the Romania, the existence of different
which joined in 2007, to comply with United Kingdom allows workers to start national measures mean that legal
national law if they want to work in employment but asks them to register procedures and conditions for labour
their country, thus restricting labour this work within 30 days. market access can vary considerably.
Social Agenda – April 2010 11
13. on age (58%) and disability (53%). These data point to a strong relation- ence discrimination and/or that
While perceptions of ethnic discrimi- ship between citizens defining the experience of discrimination or
nation remain stable (62% in 2008), themselves as part of a minority harassment is a significant factor in
there has been a significant increase group and the experience of discrim- citizens perceiving themselves to be
since the 2008 survey in the number ination, and this is particularly a ‘minority’ in these term.
of people who consider that discrimi- notable in the case of discrimina-
nation based on age (+16 percentage tion on the grounds of disability, Overall, only one in three Europeans
points since 2008) and disability (+8) ethnicity and sexual orientation. For are aware of their rights should they
are the most widespread. example, a quarter of Europeans become victims of discrimination or
who say that they belong to a harassment. However, this figure masks
There is a clear link with the current minority group in terms of ethnic considerable differences at national
economic situation, with 64% of origin also say that they have felt level. Awareness has increased since
people expecting the downturn to lead discriminated against on these the last survey in 2008 in the UK
to more age discrimination in the job grounds in the last 12 months. This (+8 points), France (+7), Ireland and
market. This may reflect both the rising suggests either that self-perceived Sweden (each +6), but fallen in Poland
unemployment among young people minorities are more likely to experi- (-12) and Portugal (-11).
in many EU countries as a result of the
slowdown but also growing awareness
of these forms of discrimination. Perception of discrimination on the basis of…
In addition, 48% of respondents – % EU
consider one’s age to be a disadvan- Rare Widespread
…ethnic origin
tage when seeking employment. This 2009 32 61
increase of three percent with respect to 2008 33 62
last year’s level sees age becoming the …age
most common perceived disadvantage 2009
2008
37
52
58
42
when seeking a job (together with a …disability
candidate’s look, dress and presentation) 2009 41 53
and will no doubt colour public percep- 2008 49 45
tion of the crisis as jobs become scarcer …sexual orientation
43 47
2009
than they have been for many years. 2008 41 51
…gender
Finally, there is an expectation that 2009 53 40
2008 56 36
the crisis is likely to have a generally
…of religion or belief
negative effect on action to tackle 2009 53 39
discrimination in terms of political and 2008 51 42
financial priority given by governments.
NB: “Don’t know” and “non-existent” (SPONTANEOUS) answers are not shown
Overall, 49% of Europeans expect less
priority to be given to discrimination
policies as a result of the economic Do you think that the economical crisis will contribute
situation, while 34% disagree. to an increase of discrimination on the basis of…
in the labour market? – %EU27
Personal experience of discrimina-
tion by respondents remains largely Yes No DK
unchanged since the same survey Age 64% 29% 7%
was carried out last year, with age
Ethnic origin 57% 34% 9%
being the most common reason (6%
Disability 56% 36% 8%
of respondents). Overall, 16% of
Europeans reported experiencing Gender 43% 49% 8%
discrimination (on the basis of race/ Religion or belief 42% 49% 9%
ethnic origin, religion, age, disability Sexual orientation 37% 52% 11%
or sexual orientation) in 2009, the Source: Eurobarometer 317
same level as in 2008.
Social Agenda – April 2010 13
17. fighting poverty and social exclusion innovative projects. National actions makers and major round tables.
in the EU can be found if we are all will cover many hundreds of different This should all pave the way to a
committed to making a difference, thus projects linked to national priorities s trengthened political commitment,
generating a new impetus in this fight. and the objectives of the Year. from the local to the European level.
Each year since 1983, Europe has Events across 29 countries Eurobarometer survey on
initiated a “European Year” awareness poverty and social exclusion
campaign designed to inform the All 27 EU Member States, as well
citizens of Europe and dialogue with as Iceland and Nor way, have A Eurobarometer survey has provided
them to work for change in mentali- signed up to the Year and are information on European perceptions
ties and behaviour. These European committed to its aims. The activi- about poverty and social exclusion. It
years also provide opportunities to ties are defined and implemented was carried out between 28 August
draw the attention of national govern- by a national body designated by and 17 September 2009 in the EU.
ments to societal themes. In 2009, the the participating country. A national Overall, nearly 27,000 citizens in all
Union celebrated the European Year programme has been drawn up by EU Member States were interviewed
for creativity and innovation, in 2008 each of the participating countries face-to-face, following a random
intercultural dialogue, in 2007 equal and can be found on the Year’s selection of respondents. It found
opportunities for all, and in 2006, website: www.2010againstpoverty. that EU citizens are strongly aware
workers’ mobility. eu. At European level, a consult- of poverty and social exclusion,
ative committee composed of with 73% feeling that poverty in
Organisation on the ground representatives of the participating their country is widespread. High
countries assists the Commission in unemployment (52%) and insufficient
The key principles of the ‘2010 implementing the European Year. wages (49%) are the most widely
European Year’ are decentralisa- The involvement of civil society and perceived ‘societal’ explanations for
tion and coordination. Activities all stakeholders is essential. A wide poverty, together with insufficient
will be prepared at EU level and at range of organisations have been social benefits and pensions (29%)
national level and implemented at involved in the conception and and the excessive cost of decent
all levels including regions, cities or implementation of the European Year, housing (26%). On the other hand,
villages. A range of activities will including the organisations which a lack of education, training or skills
be organised across Europe, such defend the interests of the people (37%), as well as ‘inherited’ poverty
as awareness-raising campaigns, experiencing poverty, the social (25%) are the most widely perceived
information sessions in schools, partners, local and regional authori- ‘personal’ reasons behind poverty.
roundtables and training for the ties, think-tanks etc. The EY2010 will
media and decision-makers, a also aim to strengthen participation Building together
journalist competition, artworks and partnerships through networking a society for all
created by artists and people experi- activities, national meetings of people
encing poverty, and many other experiencing poverty and policy Solidarity is a fundamental value of
the EU with all members of society
sharing the benefits in times of
prosperity and the burden in times
The objectives of the European Year 2010
of difficulty. In line with this principle,
Four cross-disciplinary objectives lie at the heart of this European Year: we need to build a more inclusive
Recognition: To better acknowledge the rights of people living in poverty to Europe where everyone is able to
play a full part in society. make a contribution to society. No
one can solve poverty alone, it is a
Shared responsibility and participation: To build and reinforce partner- collective responsibility. The hope for
ships between all actors working to fight poverty and social exclusion and the European Year is therefore that
emphasize collective and individual responsibility. all those involved will work together
Cohesion: To promote a more cohesive society, where no one doubts that throughout 2010, giving a voice to
society as a whole benefits from the eradication of poverty. the concerns, needs and wishes of
Commitment and practical action: To renew the pledge of the EU and its people experiencing poverty, raising
Member States to combat poverty and social exclusion. hope and inspiring each and every
European citizen.
Social Agenda – April 2010 17
18. Driving
the message home
A wide range of awareness-
raising activities is set to reach
as many people as possible
A
key theme of the European were invited to three field visits which corporate sector and public authorities)
year is the importance of gave them the opportunity to interview are expected to get involved.
collective responsibility in grass-roots practitioners.
combating poverty. A wide range of Finally, a closing conference will
activities are planned across Europe The second key event was the opening provide the opportunity to look back
during the year to raise awareness of conference on 21 January 2010 in on the year, to showcase some of the
the many forms of poverty and social Madrid, organised in partnership with successful projects and to celebrate the
exclusion, help build and reinforce the Spanish presidency which officially progress made across the continent.
partnerships in the field, and inspire launched the year by presenting the The conference will be organised
people to engage. The events will be EU-wide campaign and setting its around a set of plenary sessions and
implemented at all levels including political ambitions. interactive workshops, with a strong
regions, cities and villages, providing participatory dimension.
as many opportunities as possible for An art initiative will illustrate the
people to participate. positive contribution that arts can In addition to these common European
make in combating poverty and social events, hundreds of projects are
The link between the participating exclusion. It will show examples of expected across the participating
countries is a common European projects from various countries and countries, all to be developed by
information and communica- media including painting and photog- stakeholders such as public authori-
tion campaign co-ordinated by the raphy. It will put a particular focus ties, NGOs, social partners, founda-
European Commission. It builds around on arts as a tool to rebuild confidence tions and the media.
communication tools (posters, publica- and to promote social inclusion and
tions, videos, website and social personal empowerment. Awareness-raising has been priori-
networking tools) and features six key tised in many countries, targeting
events. The first was the conference In addition, two focus weeks - one in both people experiencing poverty and
“Poverty between reality and percep- May, the other in October - will give the wider public. Example of activi-
tions: the communication challenge” increased visibility to the European ties include information campaigns
(Brussels, 29 October 2009) which Year 2010. Rather than single on existing rights, awareness-raising
aimed to analyse perceptions of poverty events, the focus weeks should be events involving ambassadors, cooper-
and exclusion in Europe in a context of seen primarily as a forum for various ation with audiovisual media, use of
economic crisis and explore how media events and projects, such as confer- innovative technologies and social
and public authorities integrate them ences and debates but also photo networking sites, training for various
into their daily work. It was preceded exhibitions, sports events, media work actors aiming to enhance knowledge
by a seminar for journalists from across and festivals. The key themes will be and understanding of the reality of
the EU, which focused on the part that diversity, exchange and participa- poverty and a variety of art initiatives
the media plays in helping to tackle tion. Various stakeholders at EU and involving theatre groups and a travel-
poverty and exclusion. Journalists national level (NGOs, social partners, ling exhibition on homelessness.
18 Social Agenda – April 2010
22. “An Agenda for new skills and jobs”
At EU level, the Commission will:
• define and implement the second phase of the flexicurity agenda,
together with European social partners;
• adapt the legislative framework, in line with ‘smart’ regulation princi-
The strategy proposes reducing the ples, to evolving work patterns (e.g. working time, posting of workers)
number of people at risk of poverty and new risks for health and safety at work;
by 20 million. It also reiterates the • facilitate and promote intra-EU labour mobility and better match labour
EU’s goal of reducing its carbon supply with demand;
dioxide emission by up to 30%
compared to 1990. • strengthen the capacity of social partners and make full use of the
problem-solving potential of social dialogue at all levels;
Some of these targets will sound • give a strong impetus to the strategic framework for cooperation in
familiar to those acquainted with the education and training involving all stakeholders;
Lisbon strategy, originally launched in • ensure that the competences required to engage in further learning and
2000 with the stated aim of making the labour market are acquired and recognised throughout education
the EU “the most dynamic and compet- and develop a common language and operational tool for education/
itive knowledge-based economy in training and work: a European Skills, Competences and Occupations
the world by 2010, and indeed the framework (ESCO).
Europe 2020 strategy builds on what At national level, Member States will need to:
has been achieved by Lisbon and the
• implement their national pathways for flexicurity and facilitate the
lessons learned from it.
reconciliation of work and family life;
In this respect, the Commission is • review and regularly monitor the efficiency of tax and benefit systems;
adamant that for Europe 2020 to be • promote new forms of work-life balance and active ageing policies and
a success, member States must take increase gender equality;
ownership of the strategy and make it • promote and monitor the effective implementation of social dialogue
their own. To ensure that each Member outcomes;
State tailors the Europe 2020 strategy
• give a strong impetus to the implementation of the European Qualifi-
to its particular situation, the Commis-
cations Framework, through the establishment of national qualification
sion proposes that EU goals are
frameworks;
translated into national targets and
trajectories. • ensure that the competences required to engage in further learning and
the labour market are acquired and recognised throughout all forms
The targets, defined by President education;
Barroso “ambitious but attainable”, • develop partnerships between the worlds of education/training and work.
are representative of the three priori-
ties of smart, sustainable and inclusive “European Platform against Poverty”
growth but they are not exhaustive:
a wide range of actions at national, At EU level the Commission will:
EU and international levels will be • transform the open method of coordination on social exclusion and social
necessary to underpin them. The protection into a platform for cooperation, peer-review and exchange of
strategy identifies seven “flagship good practice, and into an instrument to take concrete action, including
initiatives” that the EU should take through targeted support from the structural funds, notably the ESF;
to boost growth and employment, • design and implement programmes to promote social innovation for the
including an “Agenda for new skills most vulnerable, to fight discrimination, and to develop a new agenda
for new jobs” and a “European for migrants’ integration;
platform against poverty”. These seven
flagship initiatives will commit both • undertake an assessment of the adequacy and sustainability of social
the EU and the Member States. “Our protection and pension systems, and identify ways to ensure better
new agenda requires a co-ordinated access to health care systems.
European response, including with At national level, Member States will need to:
social partners and civil society, said • promote shared collective and individual responsibility in combating
President Barroso. If we act together, poverty and social exclusion;
then we can fight back and come out • define and implement measures addressing the specific circumstances of
of the crisis stronger.” groups at particular risk;
• fully deploy their social security and pension systems to ensure adequate
income support and access to health care.
22 Social Agenda – April 2010