Successfully reported this slideshow.

Italy in Europe: missed economic adjustment and political nemesis.

0

Share

Upcoming SlideShare
Italy, ultimo atto
Italy, ultimo atto
Loading in …3
×
1 of 29
1 of 29

Italy in Europe: missed economic adjustment and political nemesis.

0

Share

Description

Ppt presentation by Silvia Merler, Head of Research, Algebris Policy & Research Forum
Rome, 07/05/2019

Transcript

  1. 1. The Elephant in the Room Italy in Europe: missed economic adjustment and political nemesis. Silvia Merler Head of Research Algebris Policy & ResearchForum 1
  2. 2. “Italy is now the centre of the political universe” Steve Bannon Sept. 2018 2 A political outlier, an economic idiosyncrasis. How did we get here, and where are we headed?
  3. 3. • Rank countriesin the 50th ’most virtuous’ vs. ’least virtuous’ percentile of the distribution for the indicatorsused in the EU Commission’s Macroeconomic Imbalance Procedure (MIP). • Over the 2000-2008 period,thisyieldsthe ’usual suspects’ • Over a longer horizon,positionsare in flux.The ‘South’ has adjusted. Source: own work based on AMECO, Eurostat – A macroeconomic imbalance-based classification of EZ economies Who is ‘North’, who is ‘South’?
  4. 4. Different growth models… • 1999-2007: demand-driven growth in theSouth • 2007-2012: demanddrops more thanGDP duringcrisis • 2012-2017: demandgrowth below pre-crisisrates Source: own work based onAMECO data
  5. 5. …have shifted. • Pre-crisis, tradecontributed negativelyto GDP growth in South. • Post-crisis,net exports are keydriverof growth inthe South; consumption more importantin the North • Italy lags behindespecially onGFC formation Source: own work based onAMECO
  6. 6. North /South: Crisis and Reversal • Pre-crisis:low real rates drewK inflowsto South. Private creditboomed. • Post-crisis:relativereal rates haveinvertedpositions; sizeable deleveraging • In Italy, real ratesarehigher (idiosyncraticpolitical risk) Source: own work based on BIS; ECB
  7. 7. North /South: Crisis and Reversal • Capital inflows mirrorin large current account imbalances • Flow adjustmenttodayis complete, legacy of external debt remains • Italy neverhad anexternal debt problem… Source: own work based onAMECO
  8. 8. The Elephant • …but Italy continues to have an internaldebtproblem • Massivepost-crisisadjustment of fiscal deficitin theSouth, much less in Italy… Source: own work based onAMECO
  9. 9. The missed adjustment • …despite interestexpenditure at its lowest since1995… • …current expenditure (excludinginterest)in Italy has not declined Source: own work based onAMECO
  10. 10. The missed adjustment • Adjustmentin the Italian bankingsector hasbeen much slower thanin theSouth • Italian bankshaveremained uncompetitive andunprofitable for longer (seeSpain) Source: own work based on ECB
  11. 11. Elusive growth • Standardsofliving have reboundedstrongly inSouth • In Italy, real p. c. GDP is at the level of 2 decadesago Source: own work based on Eurostat
  12. 12. Lack of rebalancing • South’s competitive position deterioratedin2000-2009 • Massiveimprovementsince: today North/South areequal • Italy remainsanexception • Index in1998 => it is not about thecurrency !! Source: own work based onAMECO
  13. 13. Unfit for the future? • Production in high-tech manufacturingindustrieshas stagnated(unliketheSouth) • The averageage of equipment is almost back to pre-1950s Source: own work based on Eurostat and (Bergeaud, Cette and Lecat, 2016)
  14. 14. Unfit for the future? • Italy has a low shareof population with tertiary education(2nd lowest inOECD) • Studying doesnot pay off: low InternalRateof Returnfrom pursuing tertiaryeducation Source: own work based onOECD
  15. 15. Broken Ladder • Itergenerationalmobility acrosseducational levels is especially low inItaly • Only 6% of Italians reach tertiaryeducationif neither parentsattainedupper secondary • Compareswith 17% in the North, almost 20% in theSouth Source: own work based onOECD
  16. 16. 16 • Inequality spikedin theSouth, during the crisis.Sincethen,it hasbeen decreasing • Not so in Italy Inequality Source: own work based onOECD
  17. 17. The social legacy • Unemploymentandyouth unemployment skyrocketed • Youth unemployment at 50% in 2014, downbut still high • In Italy, declinein youth unemployment is slowerand shareof NEET is highest Source: own work based on Eurostat
  18. 18. The social legacy • ...andItaly is ’special’also because almost 50%of youth unemployment is long-term • In the restof South, duration of youth unemployment today is below 1997 levels • In Italy skills gets destroyed, growth potential impaired
  19. 19. The social legacy • EmigrationfromSouth to North as anexit route. Loss of talent (braindrain) • Migrationfrom Italy has pickedup from 2012 andit is at a 5-decades-high Source: own work based onWEF; OECD
  20. 20. The political nemesis After the crisis,Europeansin North and South associate the EU with ’economic prosperity’more than with ’unemployment’.In Italy,the opposite istrue • Social malaisehas major consequencesfor political dynamicsathome andvis-à- vis the EU Source: own work based on Eurobarometer
  21. 21. The political nemesis • Those who migrate(movers) become seeEurope asan escapedoor andbecome more pro-European • Those who stayare stuck in an economically andsocially impoverishedenvironment • The result is radicalization andEuroscepticism 0 5 10 15 20 25 2007 2012 2017 The EU means ... Economic Prosperity (% mentioning) Stayers Movers 0 5 10 15 20 25 2007 2012 2017 The EU means ... Unemployment (% mentioning) Stayers Movers 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 2007 2012 2017 The EU means ... Democracy (% mentioning) Stayers Movers 0 5 10 15 20 25 2007 2012 2017 The EU means ... Social Protection (% mentioning) Stayers Movers
  22. 22. A Bad Romance ? 22 68% of Europeans think their country benefits from EU membership; only 30% believes the future would be better outside. UK and Italy outliers. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 EU EAST NORDICS UK BALTICS 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 EZ12 Core IT Programme «Better outside of the EU fuori dallaUE» (%) Fonte: APRF su dati Eurobarometro
  23. 23. Input Legitimacy 23 Fonte: APRF su dati Eurobarometro 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 My voice counts in the EU (% agree) EU EAST NORDICS UK BALTICS 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 My voice counts in the EU (% agree) EZ12 Core IT Programme Europeans do not see the EU as undemocratic, but many feel they lack a “voice” In Italy, perceived input legitimacy input is particularly low.
  24. 24. 24 Fonte: APRF su dati Eurobarometro This sense of disenfranchisement is more pronounced among those: • At the bottom of the skills distribution or outside the labour market; • In countries that have undergone a severe macroeconomic adjustment (Greece) or a prolonged stagnationin the standard of living (Italy) Input Legitimacy
  25. 25. Output Legitimacy 25 Fonte: APRF su dati Eurobarometro Europeans are thorn between economic anxiety and a sense of insecurity Italy has the highest economic anxiety; has seen largest increase in insecurity
  26. 26. 26Fonte: APRF su dati Eurobarometro In theface of economic anxiety and insecuirty, what does the EUmean to people? It used to beseen as an opportunity(for peace, democracy, prosperity..) beforethe crisis. It became a threat (ofunemployment, loss of identity…).Today,neutralassessment. But not in Italy and UK. Output Legitimacy
  27. 27. Where are we headed? The EPelections • Debt legacyon one hand, and socialstrains on the other raise a potent (although not lethal) threat of Euroscepticism • The 2019 EP electionswill not be ’the end of Europe as we know it’ but need to be a wakeup call. • A Union that no longerrepresents an unequivocalopportunity to counter economicanxietyand insecurity, is not sustainable. • Today, “North” and “South” are closer than ever, in terms of economicperformance.Adjustmenthas been unilateral. • it is possiblythe best time to have an honest and open discussionabout EU (and especiallyEZ) solidarity…
  28. 28. Where are we headed? Italy …but Italy is an obstacleto that discussion. Italy stands out from the crowd: • especially high public debt burden and no fiscal adjustment • lagging behind in terms of competitiveness adjustment • uniquely rising long-term nominal and real rates • stubbornly high long-term youth unemployment • stagnating standard of livings, rising inequality • low intergenerational mobility, sizeablebrain-drain • loss of faith in the ’meaning’ of the EU as a prosperity project
  29. 29. Where are we headed? Italy Italy is a caseof missed adjustment (before and during crisis). This explainswhy its recent economicpolicychoiceshavenot won Italy any ‘friends’ in either the North or the South. Lookingat Italy back in 1978, Posnerwrote that historically,in interactingwith the internationalpoliticaleconomy: ”one of [Italy’s] main bargaining devices has been that its creditors could not affordto see it go bankrupt”. But is this still true today?

Description

Ppt presentation by Silvia Merler, Head of Research, Algebris Policy & Research Forum
Rome, 07/05/2019

Transcript

  1. 1. The Elephant in the Room Italy in Europe: missed economic adjustment and political nemesis. Silvia Merler Head of Research Algebris Policy & ResearchForum 1
  2. 2. “Italy is now the centre of the political universe” Steve Bannon Sept. 2018 2 A political outlier, an economic idiosyncrasis. How did we get here, and where are we headed?
  3. 3. • Rank countriesin the 50th ’most virtuous’ vs. ’least virtuous’ percentile of the distribution for the indicatorsused in the EU Commission’s Macroeconomic Imbalance Procedure (MIP). • Over the 2000-2008 period,thisyieldsthe ’usual suspects’ • Over a longer horizon,positionsare in flux.The ‘South’ has adjusted. Source: own work based on AMECO, Eurostat – A macroeconomic imbalance-based classification of EZ economies Who is ‘North’, who is ‘South’?
  4. 4. Different growth models… • 1999-2007: demand-driven growth in theSouth • 2007-2012: demanddrops more thanGDP duringcrisis • 2012-2017: demandgrowth below pre-crisisrates Source: own work based onAMECO data
  5. 5. …have shifted. • Pre-crisis, tradecontributed negativelyto GDP growth in South. • Post-crisis,net exports are keydriverof growth inthe South; consumption more importantin the North • Italy lags behindespecially onGFC formation Source: own work based onAMECO
  6. 6. North /South: Crisis and Reversal • Pre-crisis:low real rates drewK inflowsto South. Private creditboomed. • Post-crisis:relativereal rates haveinvertedpositions; sizeable deleveraging • In Italy, real ratesarehigher (idiosyncraticpolitical risk) Source: own work based on BIS; ECB
  7. 7. North /South: Crisis and Reversal • Capital inflows mirrorin large current account imbalances • Flow adjustmenttodayis complete, legacy of external debt remains • Italy neverhad anexternal debt problem… Source: own work based onAMECO
  8. 8. The Elephant • …but Italy continues to have an internaldebtproblem • Massivepost-crisisadjustment of fiscal deficitin theSouth, much less in Italy… Source: own work based onAMECO
  9. 9. The missed adjustment • …despite interestexpenditure at its lowest since1995… • …current expenditure (excludinginterest)in Italy has not declined Source: own work based onAMECO
  10. 10. The missed adjustment • Adjustmentin the Italian bankingsector hasbeen much slower thanin theSouth • Italian bankshaveremained uncompetitive andunprofitable for longer (seeSpain) Source: own work based on ECB
  11. 11. Elusive growth • Standardsofliving have reboundedstrongly inSouth • In Italy, real p. c. GDP is at the level of 2 decadesago Source: own work based on Eurostat
  12. 12. Lack of rebalancing • South’s competitive position deterioratedin2000-2009 • Massiveimprovementsince: today North/South areequal • Italy remainsanexception • Index in1998 => it is not about thecurrency !! Source: own work based onAMECO
  13. 13. Unfit for the future? • Production in high-tech manufacturingindustrieshas stagnated(unliketheSouth) • The averageage of equipment is almost back to pre-1950s Source: own work based on Eurostat and (Bergeaud, Cette and Lecat, 2016)
  14. 14. Unfit for the future? • Italy has a low shareof population with tertiary education(2nd lowest inOECD) • Studying doesnot pay off: low InternalRateof Returnfrom pursuing tertiaryeducation Source: own work based onOECD
  15. 15. Broken Ladder • Itergenerationalmobility acrosseducational levels is especially low inItaly • Only 6% of Italians reach tertiaryeducationif neither parentsattainedupper secondary • Compareswith 17% in the North, almost 20% in theSouth Source: own work based onOECD
  16. 16. 16 • Inequality spikedin theSouth, during the crisis.Sincethen,it hasbeen decreasing • Not so in Italy Inequality Source: own work based onOECD
  17. 17. The social legacy • Unemploymentandyouth unemployment skyrocketed • Youth unemployment at 50% in 2014, downbut still high • In Italy, declinein youth unemployment is slowerand shareof NEET is highest Source: own work based on Eurostat
  18. 18. The social legacy • ...andItaly is ’special’also because almost 50%of youth unemployment is long-term • In the restof South, duration of youth unemployment today is below 1997 levels • In Italy skills gets destroyed, growth potential impaired
  19. 19. The social legacy • EmigrationfromSouth to North as anexit route. Loss of talent (braindrain) • Migrationfrom Italy has pickedup from 2012 andit is at a 5-decades-high Source: own work based onWEF; OECD
  20. 20. The political nemesis After the crisis,Europeansin North and South associate the EU with ’economic prosperity’more than with ’unemployment’.In Italy,the opposite istrue • Social malaisehas major consequencesfor political dynamicsathome andvis-à- vis the EU Source: own work based on Eurobarometer
  21. 21. The political nemesis • Those who migrate(movers) become seeEurope asan escapedoor andbecome more pro-European • Those who stayare stuck in an economically andsocially impoverishedenvironment • The result is radicalization andEuroscepticism 0 5 10 15 20 25 2007 2012 2017 The EU means ... Economic Prosperity (% mentioning) Stayers Movers 0 5 10 15 20 25 2007 2012 2017 The EU means ... Unemployment (% mentioning) Stayers Movers 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 2007 2012 2017 The EU means ... Democracy (% mentioning) Stayers Movers 0 5 10 15 20 25 2007 2012 2017 The EU means ... Social Protection (% mentioning) Stayers Movers
  22. 22. A Bad Romance ? 22 68% of Europeans think their country benefits from EU membership; only 30% believes the future would be better outside. UK and Italy outliers. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 EU EAST NORDICS UK BALTICS 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 EZ12 Core IT Programme «Better outside of the EU fuori dallaUE» (%) Fonte: APRF su dati Eurobarometro
  23. 23. Input Legitimacy 23 Fonte: APRF su dati Eurobarometro 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 My voice counts in the EU (% agree) EU EAST NORDICS UK BALTICS 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 My voice counts in the EU (% agree) EZ12 Core IT Programme Europeans do not see the EU as undemocratic, but many feel they lack a “voice” In Italy, perceived input legitimacy input is particularly low.
  24. 24. 24 Fonte: APRF su dati Eurobarometro This sense of disenfranchisement is more pronounced among those: • At the bottom of the skills distribution or outside the labour market; • In countries that have undergone a severe macroeconomic adjustment (Greece) or a prolonged stagnationin the standard of living (Italy) Input Legitimacy
  25. 25. Output Legitimacy 25 Fonte: APRF su dati Eurobarometro Europeans are thorn between economic anxiety and a sense of insecurity Italy has the highest economic anxiety; has seen largest increase in insecurity
  26. 26. 26Fonte: APRF su dati Eurobarometro In theface of economic anxiety and insecuirty, what does the EUmean to people? It used to beseen as an opportunity(for peace, democracy, prosperity..) beforethe crisis. It became a threat (ofunemployment, loss of identity…).Today,neutralassessment. But not in Italy and UK. Output Legitimacy
  27. 27. Where are we headed? The EPelections • Debt legacyon one hand, and socialstrains on the other raise a potent (although not lethal) threat of Euroscepticism • The 2019 EP electionswill not be ’the end of Europe as we know it’ but need to be a wakeup call. • A Union that no longerrepresents an unequivocalopportunity to counter economicanxietyand insecurity, is not sustainable. • Today, “North” and “South” are closer than ever, in terms of economicperformance.Adjustmenthas been unilateral. • it is possiblythe best time to have an honest and open discussionabout EU (and especiallyEZ) solidarity…
  28. 28. Where are we headed? Italy …but Italy is an obstacleto that discussion. Italy stands out from the crowd: • especially high public debt burden and no fiscal adjustment • lagging behind in terms of competitiveness adjustment • uniquely rising long-term nominal and real rates • stubbornly high long-term youth unemployment • stagnating standard of livings, rising inequality • low intergenerational mobility, sizeablebrain-drain • loss of faith in the ’meaning’ of the EU as a prosperity project
  29. 29. Where are we headed? Italy Italy is a caseof missed adjustment (before and during crisis). This explainswhy its recent economicpolicychoiceshavenot won Italy any ‘friends’ in either the North or the South. Lookingat Italy back in 1978, Posnerwrote that historically,in interactingwith the internationalpoliticaleconomy: ”one of [Italy’s] main bargaining devices has been that its creditors could not affordto see it go bankrupt”. But is this still true today?

More Related Content

More from Istituto Affari Internazionali

Related Books

Free with a 30 day trial from Scribd

See all

Related Audiobooks

Free with a 30 day trial from Scribd

See all

×