General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual Proper...
A comparison study on academic performance between ryerson (1)
1. A Comparison Study on Academic
Performance between Ryerson
University ECS Students in Years 1-4
to See if the Type of Childcare they
Attended had a Long Term Effect on
their Current GPA
Arina Artemova, Milica Hranisavljevic, Amna Mohammed Nur,
Roshni Rathod
Thursday, April 9th, 2015
2. General Topic
The general topic is to see if there are
any long term effects of the type of
childcare received in the early years.
It is important to understand the
impact childcare has on academic
performance.
3. Purpose
The purpose of our study is to see if
there are any academic differences
between ECS students based on the
type of childcare the students
attended whether it was homecare or
childcare.
4. Hypothesis
We hypothesize that the group of
Ryerson University ECS students who
attended childcare will have a higher
GPA than those who attended
homecare.
5. Variables
The Independent Variable is the Type
of Care received (homecare or
childcare)
The Dependent Variable is the number
of people with a certain GPA range.
6. Research Design
Post-Test Comparison Group Design
X₁ O ₁ X₁ = Homecare
---------------- X₂ = Childcare
X₂ O₂ O₁-O₂ = # of people with a certain GPA
range.
7. Population and Sampling
Our population is Ryerson ECS students in years 1-4, both full
time and part-time students.
Our Sampling Technique was Random Sampling.
Our sample consisted of 53 respondents.
7 respondents from 1st year
11 respondents from 2nd year
20 respondents from 3rd year
11 respondents from 4th year
4 part-time time students
8. Apparatus Used
The apparatus that were used was a
computer to send an electronic survey to
the students.
Topics included the type of childcare
attended, whether or not it had and
effect on their current school
performance, and their current GPA which
they choose from a range scale.
9. Apparatus Used
Our choice of apparatus was appropriate
because it is readily accessible and
allowed for confidentiality as no personal
information was asked or used that could
potentially identify any of the subjects
that voluntarily chose to participate in our
survey.
10. A Sample of Our Questions
Quantitative Question
11. A Sample of Our Questions
Qualitative Question: Open Ended Question
12. A Sample of Our Questions
Closed Ended Question
13. Data Collection Procedure
After we obtained the Ethics Approval,
the approved survey which included
the Consent Information, was then
forwarded to the ECS students.
A week later, we received the results
via Google document spread sheet.
14. Statistical Test
To test our hypothesis, the statistical test
we used was the Chi²-Test of Association.
15. Chi²-Test of Association
Our dependent variable is Number of
Subjects.
The two sets of choices are type of
care and GPA range.
16.
17. Data Summary Sheet
Our data summary sheet has 3 columns.
The first column is the Type of Care.
1 = Homecare
2 = Childcare
The second column is the GPA ranges.
1 = 1.67 – 2.5
2 = 2.6 – 3.5
3 = 3.6 – 4.33
The third column is the number of people in each GPA range.
19. Main Findings
The significance level of our statistical
test is 0.1155
(0.231/2 = 0.1155, since a direction was
predicted)
Our hypothesis was not supported as our
significance level is higher then 0.05.
20. Main Findings Cont.
Quantitative:
- 14 respondents identified that they
attended childcare and 39 respondents
attended homecare.
- 26 % of our sample attended childcare and
74 % attended homecare.
21. Main Findings Cont.
Homecare
20 people who attended homecare said it had a positive
effect.
3 people who attended homecare said it had a negative effect.
16 people were not sure.
Childcare
10 people who attended childcare said it had a positive effect.
2 people who attended childcare said it had a negative effect.
2 people were not sure.
22. Main Findings Cont.
Examples of Qualitative Responses for Homecare
Positive:
“I was raised in a nurturing environment. It left a
positive effect on me because it pushed me to learn and
apply my knowledge for academic purposes. It showed me
that knowledge is power and that I am capable of
learning a lot as long as I can committed to my studies.”
23. Main Findings Cont.
Examples of Qualitative Responses for Homecare
Negative:
“The quality of homecare was low and therefore had a
negative effect on school and academic performance.
There was no special focus on improving skills such as
social, emotional, or cognitive skills. Much of the
homecare was focused on free play with no schedule or
activities.”
24. Main Findings Cont.
Examples of Qualitative Responses for Childcare
Positive:
“positive - I was aware of the structure of a
schedule and of the rules expected in society and
in a school like setting”
25. Main Findings Cont.
Examples of Qualitative Responses for Childcare
Negative:
“negative because of the poor condition of the
daycare it didn't provide me with the learning
opportunities other children would have at a
higher quality daycare.”
28. Strengths
By using a survey for our data collection
procedure, it allowed for confidential and
anonymous responses by the ECS students
who wished to partake.
Because our survey was online,
participants complete it at their
convenience and in a setting where they
are comfortable which reduces
environmental bias.
29. Weaknesses
Sampling Bias: We only had 53
respondents in total.
Self-Report Data: Some respondents
may have withheld their honest
thoughts when answering the
questions.
30. Interpretations, Conclusions and
Implications
Interpretations
We think we got these results because of the long
time frame between when ECS students attended
childcare to the present. This could have made some
of their recollections difficult.
Our data was collected for only a week, this makes it
difficult to generalize our results because of the short
time frame and fewer respondents then would likely
be if we had more time.
31. Interpretations, Conclusions and
Implications
Conclusions
Our hypothesis was not supported.
There was no difference between the GPA ranges
of students who attended homecare or childcare.
We found that more Ryerson ECS students
attended homecare than childcare, which was not
what we predicted.
32. Interpretations, Conclusions and
Implications
Implications
The greatest impact that attending homecare or
childcare would have is during the early years.
However, our study shows that there is no
difference or effect on post-secondary
performance whether or not a student attended
homecare or childcare in the early years.
33. Findings Related Back to the Literature
We Read
The literature that we analyzed was looking at
school readiness after attending homecare vs.
childcare.
Our study extends the existing body of knowledge
because we looked into Ryerson ECS students
performance being their GPA’s based what type of
care they had, whether homecare or childcare.
This makes our study significant because it shows
that the early years are a crucial period to have an
impact on school performance early on.
