SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 1
Download to read offline
630 PlJBLIC LANDS. [NO). ~S4. 
Tho object of the petitioner is to obl:-,n now the indemnification 10 which he would ha~e t.eeu entitled 
und~r the nfQ~aid act, on hi. oornplianoo with the ..equiremenb of the same. The ""mmittee having 
utis6ed themselves, from II.Il """,ninati"" of the evidence produced to them, of the exiat('"cc and loss of 
the original certificates described in the petiili>n, and t11"t the petitioner '<"Quid baTe been entitled to 
indemnification the~for under the actof 1814, if he had presented his cl aim to the commissionerJI appointed 
to carry the said act iul<> ,oWed, and had in oLher respeebl oompJied with the provisions of the same ; and 
th"t Congre1ls have already, by an act passed on April 16, 1818, ill behlf of the representatives of 
<kOTg{! Peal'Wn, extended .-did in a similar case i and ha.ving, moreover, aaoortained by inquiry tit the 
proper dep"rtment, thM a cooaider:l.ble bahnce or tbe suma app""priated by the af"resaid act fm' the 
indemnification of the holders of claims denominated citizens' rights, ~nd al00 of the bolders of claims in 
tho TenMsseo Company, remain unexpended in the treasury of the United States, h .... e considc~ {hat 
the prayer of the petitioner is reasonable, and that it ought to be granted. 
By referring to the secretary of lhe board of commissioner. nnder the actof ISH, the committee ha .. o 
ascertained tht the indemnifiClltion which WR6 allowed to the hold crs of citizens' rigbls in tho purchase of 
the western territory of the SU.te of Georg;" wae:l.t the rate of twelve and a. h:l.lf cen ts per acre. Tho 
number of acres caUed for by the scrip held by the petitioner being n ,nl acJU, tho amouot 10 which he 
13 clltiUoxI is $8,968 Sit ceuw, f(l' which sUIll they accordingly report a bill. 
20.s (JoNoaDS./ No. 733. [21> SI;SSlON . 
APPLICATION OF INDIANA CLAWING ALL THE PUBLIC LANDS IN TII.A.T STATE. 
coml1.1NIC~TEB TO .... E SE ..... n: F£IlR(JUY 10, 1829. 
ReStJl>Xd by (he generalMremUy if ,Ile SUUe if rndimla, That this Stale, being .. sovereign, free, and 
independent State, b36 the Dxclusive ri ghJ to the soil oud eminent domain of all the unappropriated lando 
within hcr acknowledged boundar;"", wblch r ight wu ffaerved for her by the State or Virginia, in tbe 
deed of ceJisiQn of the Northweetern Terrlt<.>ry to the United States, being conOrmed and cat:l.blished by 
the ar~iclea of wnfeder.cy and the Constitution of ·tho Uni~d St~le.'I. 
That our sen:>.to!1l in C<.>ngress be instructed, tOO our representatives requested, touseevcry exertion 
in their power, hy reason and argument, I<.> induce tbe United State. I<.> aclmowlcdgo tbis vested right of 
tbe States, and plaee ber upon:l.n equal footing witb tbe original State., in e .. ery respect wbatllW .. er, as 
well in fact as in namc. 
That hig = llency the governor be requcsted to transmit .. copy of this resolution to each of Our 
senators and represent:l.ti .. es in Congress, and to e~ch of their e:&:ceHencies the governors of ..,acb of the 
following States, to wit : Ohio, Illinois, Missouri, Mississippi, Louisiana., and Afaham:l., ,.quostiug them 
to by it before the leg islatures <.or their «,apecti .. e States for consideration, reqncsting them to adopt 
similar meaSures If tbey should deem it e,;ped,ent. 
ISAAC HOWE:, SpecI:er of the HoWie of Jkpmenlati~"eS. 
M. STAPP, PmidMl of Me &nate. 
Appro .. ed January g, A. D. 1829. 
J. BROWN RAY. 
20 ... Co"'GllE'"'/ No. 734. ( 2D SESSION. 
CORRECTION OF ERRcOR IN PATENT FOR BOUNTY LAND. 
Mr. lUCKS, from 
OOmruNlc..tUB "«1111£ notls~ 0' R&l"I!E!!E>o"T~nv"" J"~.""oUIY 12, l829. 
the OOflunittee on the Public Lands, to whom was referred the bi!! frolll tbe Senate, 
entitled ".An M~ for the relief of Aleunder CllBuingham,n r eported; 
That though it :l.ppeard by tho letter of the Commiasioncrof tho (kncral Land Office, of the 9th of 
January last. tht an crror was committed: in making out the grant for the military bounty of Slid 
Cunningham'. father, whereby ~ qnar~r section of lond Wn$ inJIcrled th:l.t had previously heen panted, 
yet it is alao 6how .. , and ao uuder6tood, tbat wi, error might now be Wmlcted in the office, and ~ new 
patent be iSijued for the ~u .. rter aeotion for wbich the warrant is.uedi and the committee do not conJIider 
tbat ~:notl>et quarter .ecllon ought to be ""leoted or drawn for, espec,aUy ns it appear. from tbe evidence 
beforo tl>em that the r,erson to be benefited by tile relicf is not the Jl:ranlr:c, or bis heir-at.-iaw, hut an 
a~igllee <If the tilJe. l'bey ther .. fore recommend the rej~ction of the b,U.

More Related Content

Similar to Application of-indiana-to-claim-public-lands-highlighted

Application of-missouri-for-a-change-highlighted
Application of-missouri-for-a-change-highlightedApplication of-missouri-for-a-change-highlighted
Application of-missouri-for-a-change-highlightedAmerican Lands Council
 
1833 u.s.-house-public-lands-committee-report
1833 u.s.-house-public-lands-committee-report1833 u.s.-house-public-lands-committee-report
1833 u.s.-house-public-lands-committee-reportAmerican Lands Council
 
hare-hawes-cutting act of 1933
hare-hawes-cutting act of 1933hare-hawes-cutting act of 1933
hare-hawes-cutting act of 1933Edwin Padrilanan
 
208674362 trust-cases-docx
208674362 trust-cases-docx208674362 trust-cases-docx
208674362 trust-cases-docxhomeworkping8
 
All People's Congress v NASMOS, Supreme Court of Sierra Leone, 26 October 1999
All People's Congress v NASMOS, Supreme Court of Sierra Leone, 26 October 1999All People's Congress v NASMOS, Supreme Court of Sierra Leone, 26 October 1999
All People's Congress v NASMOS, Supreme Court of Sierra Leone, 26 October 1999Tony Kinnear
 
Bill Cosby Court Complaint 2005
Bill Cosby Court Complaint 2005Bill Cosby Court Complaint 2005
Bill Cosby Court Complaint 2005Clear Reporting
 
NY Court of Appeals Motion to Accept Town of Dryden Ban Case
NY Court of Appeals Motion to Accept Town of Dryden Ban CaseNY Court of Appeals Motion to Accept Town of Dryden Ban Case
NY Court of Appeals Motion to Accept Town of Dryden Ban CaseMarcellus Drilling News
 
King Teola "Tee" Patillo II of the Patillo Family Kingdom goes to court to fi...
King Teola "Tee" Patillo II of the Patillo Family Kingdom goes to court to fi...King Teola "Tee" Patillo II of the Patillo Family Kingdom goes to court to fi...
King Teola "Tee" Patillo II of the Patillo Family Kingdom goes to court to fi...Terrell Patillo
 
The New Age of Surveillance - The New American Magazine - Nov 7 2013
The New Age of Surveillance - The New American Magazine - Nov 7 2013The New Age of Surveillance - The New American Magazine - Nov 7 2013
The New Age of Surveillance - The New American Magazine - Nov 7 2013miscott57
 
California State Lands Commission - City of Hermosa Beach State Tidelands Trust
California State Lands Commission - City of Hermosa Beach State Tidelands TrustCalifornia State Lands Commission - City of Hermosa Beach State Tidelands Trust
California State Lands Commission - City of Hermosa Beach State Tidelands TrustStopHermosaBeachOil
 
G.R. NO. 208493 Social Justice Societe (SJS) President Samson S. Alcantara Vs...
G.R. NO. 208493 Social Justice Societe (SJS) President Samson S. Alcantara Vs...G.R. NO. 208493 Social Justice Societe (SJS) President Samson S. Alcantara Vs...
G.R. NO. 208493 Social Justice Societe (SJS) President Samson S. Alcantara Vs...NowPlanetTV
 
5-6-2016-Pls.-Mem.-Supp.-Summ.-J.-Deitz-v.-Belmont-15-CVS-3203-Gaston-Cty.-Su...
5-6-2016-Pls.-Mem.-Supp.-Summ.-J.-Deitz-v.-Belmont-15-CVS-3203-Gaston-Cty.-Su...5-6-2016-Pls.-Mem.-Supp.-Summ.-J.-Deitz-v.-Belmont-15-CVS-3203-Gaston-Cty.-Su...
5-6-2016-Pls.-Mem.-Supp.-Summ.-J.-Deitz-v.-Belmont-15-CVS-3203-Gaston-Cty.-Su...Elliot Engstrom
 
Andrew jackson-veto-statement-history-of-public-lands-trust
Andrew jackson-veto-statement-history-of-public-lands-trustAndrew jackson-veto-statement-history-of-public-lands-trust
Andrew jackson-veto-statement-history-of-public-lands-trustAmerican Lands Council
 

Similar to Application of-indiana-to-claim-public-lands-highlighted (20)

Application of-missouri-for-a-change-highlighted
Application of-missouri-for-a-change-highlightedApplication of-missouri-for-a-change-highlighted
Application of-missouri-for-a-change-highlighted
 
1833 u.s.-house-public-lands-committee-report
1833 u.s.-house-public-lands-committee-report1833 u.s.-house-public-lands-committee-report
1833 u.s.-house-public-lands-committee-report
 
hare-hawes-cutting act of 1933
hare-hawes-cutting act of 1933hare-hawes-cutting act of 1933
hare-hawes-cutting act of 1933
 
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
 
208674362 trust-cases-docx
208674362 trust-cases-docx208674362 trust-cases-docx
208674362 trust-cases-docx
 
Apush1
Apush1Apush1
Apush1
 
All People's Congress v NASMOS, Supreme Court of Sierra Leone, 26 October 1999
All People's Congress v NASMOS, Supreme Court of Sierra Leone, 26 October 1999All People's Congress v NASMOS, Supreme Court of Sierra Leone, 26 October 1999
All People's Congress v NASMOS, Supreme Court of Sierra Leone, 26 October 1999
 
Bill Cosby Court Complaint 2005
Bill Cosby Court Complaint 2005Bill Cosby Court Complaint 2005
Bill Cosby Court Complaint 2005
 
NY Court of Appeals Motion to Accept Town of Dryden Ban Case
NY Court of Appeals Motion to Accept Town of Dryden Ban CaseNY Court of Appeals Motion to Accept Town of Dryden Ban Case
NY Court of Appeals Motion to Accept Town of Dryden Ban Case
 
Land Law Essays
Land Law EssaysLand Law Essays
Land Law Essays
 
King Teola "Tee" Patillo II of the Patillo Family Kingdom goes to court to fi...
King Teola "Tee" Patillo II of the Patillo Family Kingdom goes to court to fi...King Teola "Tee" Patillo II of the Patillo Family Kingdom goes to court to fi...
King Teola "Tee" Patillo II of the Patillo Family Kingdom goes to court to fi...
 
The New Age of Surveillance - The New American Magazine - Nov 7 2013
The New Age of Surveillance - The New American Magazine - Nov 7 2013The New Age of Surveillance - The New American Magazine - Nov 7 2013
The New Age of Surveillance - The New American Magazine - Nov 7 2013
 
Land Law Essay
Land Law EssayLand Law Essay
Land Law Essay
 
FR-1951-02-16.pdf
FR-1951-02-16.pdfFR-1951-02-16.pdf
FR-1951-02-16.pdf
 
Application of-illinois-highlighted
Application of-illinois-highlightedApplication of-illinois-highlighted
Application of-illinois-highlighted
 
California State Lands Commission - City of Hermosa Beach State Tidelands Trust
California State Lands Commission - City of Hermosa Beach State Tidelands TrustCalifornia State Lands Commission - City of Hermosa Beach State Tidelands Trust
California State Lands Commission - City of Hermosa Beach State Tidelands Trust
 
G.R. NO. 208493 Social Justice Societe (SJS) President Samson S. Alcantara Vs...
G.R. NO. 208493 Social Justice Societe (SJS) President Samson S. Alcantara Vs...G.R. NO. 208493 Social Justice Societe (SJS) President Samson S. Alcantara Vs...
G.R. NO. 208493 Social Justice Societe (SJS) President Samson S. Alcantara Vs...
 
5-6-2016-Pls.-Mem.-Supp.-Summ.-J.-Deitz-v.-Belmont-15-CVS-3203-Gaston-Cty.-Su...
5-6-2016-Pls.-Mem.-Supp.-Summ.-J.-Deitz-v.-Belmont-15-CVS-3203-Gaston-Cty.-Su...5-6-2016-Pls.-Mem.-Supp.-Summ.-J.-Deitz-v.-Belmont-15-CVS-3203-Gaston-Cty.-Su...
5-6-2016-Pls.-Mem.-Supp.-Summ.-J.-Deitz-v.-Belmont-15-CVS-3203-Gaston-Cty.-Su...
 
129425245 64phil600
129425245 64phil600129425245 64phil600
129425245 64phil600
 
Andrew jackson-veto-statement-history-of-public-lands-trust
Andrew jackson-veto-statement-history-of-public-lands-trustAndrew jackson-veto-statement-history-of-public-lands-trust
Andrew jackson-veto-statement-history-of-public-lands-trust
 

More from American Lands Council

Wayne County Utah Resolution of Support
Wayne County Utah Resolution of SupportWayne County Utah Resolution of Support
Wayne County Utah Resolution of SupportAmerican Lands Council
 
Sutherland Legal Analysis of UT HB 148
Sutherland Legal Analysis of UT HB 148Sutherland Legal Analysis of UT HB 148
Sutherland Legal Analysis of UT HB 148American Lands Council
 
ALC Presentation by Sen. Fielder, Cortez, CO - May 18, 2015
ALC Presentation by Sen. Fielder, Cortez, CO - May 18, 2015ALC Presentation by Sen. Fielder, Cortez, CO - May 18, 2015
ALC Presentation by Sen. Fielder, Cortez, CO - May 18, 2015American Lands Council
 
TPL Presentation: Washington State, April 2015
TPL Presentation: Washington State, April 2015TPL Presentation: Washington State, April 2015
TPL Presentation: Washington State, April 2015American Lands Council
 
Oregon Transfer of public Lands Presentation March 2015
Oregon Transfer of public Lands Presentation March 2015Oregon Transfer of public Lands Presentation March 2015
Oregon Transfer of public Lands Presentation March 2015American Lands Council
 
PERC Divided Lands: State vs. Federal Land Management in the West
PERC Divided Lands: State vs. Federal Land Management in the WestPERC Divided Lands: State vs. Federal Land Management in the West
PERC Divided Lands: State vs. Federal Land Management in the WestAmerican Lands Council
 
Sportsmen for Fish and Wildlife Dixie Chapter, Resolution of Support
Sportsmen for Fish and Wildlife Dixie Chapter, Resolution of SupportSportsmen for Fish and Wildlife Dixie Chapter, Resolution of Support
Sportsmen for Fish and Wildlife Dixie Chapter, Resolution of SupportAmerican Lands Council
 
Quartzsite, AZ Resolution of Support, 2015
Quartzsite, AZ Resolution of Support, 2015Quartzsite, AZ Resolution of Support, 2015
Quartzsite, AZ Resolution of Support, 2015American Lands Council
 
Mineral county, MT Resolution of Support
Mineral county, MT Resolution of SupportMineral county, MT Resolution of Support
Mineral county, MT Resolution of SupportAmerican Lands Council
 
Town of Eagar, AZ resolution Oct. 1, 2013
Town of Eagar, AZ resolution Oct. 1, 2013Town of Eagar, AZ resolution Oct. 1, 2013
Town of Eagar, AZ resolution Oct. 1, 2013American Lands Council
 
St. George, UT Chamber of Commerce Letters in Support of the Transfer
St. George, UT Chamber of Commerce Letters in Support of the TransferSt. George, UT Chamber of Commerce Letters in Support of the Transfer
St. George, UT Chamber of Commerce Letters in Support of the TransferAmerican Lands Council
 
Lincoln County MT's Delicate Fiscal Condition
Lincoln County MT's Delicate Fiscal ConditionLincoln County MT's Delicate Fiscal Condition
Lincoln County MT's Delicate Fiscal ConditionAmerican Lands Council
 

More from American Lands Council (20)

FreeTheLands Candidate Pledge 2016
FreeTheLands Candidate Pledge 2016   FreeTheLands Candidate Pledge 2016
FreeTheLands Candidate Pledge 2016
 
Final Agency Decision
Final Agency DecisionFinal Agency Decision
Final Agency Decision
 
Wayne County Utah Resolution of Support
Wayne County Utah Resolution of SupportWayne County Utah Resolution of Support
Wayne County Utah Resolution of Support
 
ALC Booklet Small Version
ALC Booklet Small VersionALC Booklet Small Version
ALC Booklet Small Version
 
Sutherland Legal Analysis of UT HB 148
Sutherland Legal Analysis of UT HB 148Sutherland Legal Analysis of UT HB 148
Sutherland Legal Analysis of UT HB 148
 
ALC Presentation by Sen. Fielder, Cortez, CO - May 18, 2015
ALC Presentation by Sen. Fielder, Cortez, CO - May 18, 2015ALC Presentation by Sen. Fielder, Cortez, CO - May 18, 2015
ALC Presentation by Sen. Fielder, Cortez, CO - May 18, 2015
 
Opportunity to Stand for Something
Opportunity to Stand for SomethingOpportunity to Stand for Something
Opportunity to Stand for Something
 
ALC Foundation Booklet
ALC Foundation BookletALC Foundation Booklet
ALC Foundation Booklet
 
TPL Presentation: Washington State, April 2015
TPL Presentation: Washington State, April 2015TPL Presentation: Washington State, April 2015
TPL Presentation: Washington State, April 2015
 
Open Office Manager Position
Open Office Manager PositionOpen Office Manager Position
Open Office Manager Position
 
Oregon Transfer of public Lands Presentation March 2015
Oregon Transfer of public Lands Presentation March 2015Oregon Transfer of public Lands Presentation March 2015
Oregon Transfer of public Lands Presentation March 2015
 
PERC Divided Lands: State vs. Federal Land Management in the West
PERC Divided Lands: State vs. Federal Land Management in the WestPERC Divided Lands: State vs. Federal Land Management in the West
PERC Divided Lands: State vs. Federal Land Management in the West
 
Klamath County Oregon Resolution
Klamath County Oregon ResolutionKlamath County Oregon Resolution
Klamath County Oregon Resolution
 
Sportsmen for Fish and Wildlife Dixie Chapter, Resolution of Support
Sportsmen for Fish and Wildlife Dixie Chapter, Resolution of SupportSportsmen for Fish and Wildlife Dixie Chapter, Resolution of Support
Sportsmen for Fish and Wildlife Dixie Chapter, Resolution of Support
 
Quartzsite, AZ Resolution of Support, 2015
Quartzsite, AZ Resolution of Support, 2015Quartzsite, AZ Resolution of Support, 2015
Quartzsite, AZ Resolution of Support, 2015
 
Mineral county, MT Resolution of Support
Mineral county, MT Resolution of SupportMineral county, MT Resolution of Support
Mineral county, MT Resolution of Support
 
Town of Eagar, AZ resolution Oct. 1, 2013
Town of Eagar, AZ resolution Oct. 1, 2013Town of Eagar, AZ resolution Oct. 1, 2013
Town of Eagar, AZ resolution Oct. 1, 2013
 
St. George, UT Chamber of Commerce Letters in Support of the Transfer
St. George, UT Chamber of Commerce Letters in Support of the TransferSt. George, UT Chamber of Commerce Letters in Support of the Transfer
St. George, UT Chamber of Commerce Letters in Support of the Transfer
 
Lincoln County MT's Delicate Fiscal Condition
Lincoln County MT's Delicate Fiscal ConditionLincoln County MT's Delicate Fiscal Condition
Lincoln County MT's Delicate Fiscal Condition
 
Presentation Request Form
Presentation Request FormPresentation Request Form
Presentation Request Form
 

Application of-indiana-to-claim-public-lands-highlighted

  • 1. 630 PlJBLIC LANDS. [NO). ~S4. Tho object of the petitioner is to obl:-,n now the indemnification 10 which he would ha~e t.eeu entitled und~r the nfQ~aid act, on hi. oornplianoo with the ..equiremenb of the same. The ""mmittee having utis6ed themselves, from II.Il """,ninati"" of the evidence produced to them, of the exiat('"cc and loss of the original certificates described in the petiili>n, and t11"t the petitioner '<"Quid baTe been entitled to indemnification the~for under the actof 1814, if he had presented his cl aim to the commissionerJI appointed to carry the said act iul<> ,oWed, and had in oLher respeebl oompJied with the provisions of the same ; and th"t Congre1ls have already, by an act passed on April 16, 1818, ill behlf of the representatives of <kOTg{! Peal'Wn, extended .-did in a similar case i and ha.ving, moreover, aaoortained by inquiry tit the proper dep"rtment, thM a cooaider:l.ble bahnce or tbe suma app""priated by the af"resaid act fm' the indemnification of the holders of claims denominated citizens' rights, ~nd al00 of the bolders of claims in tho TenMsseo Company, remain unexpended in the treasury of the United States, h .... e considc~ {hat the prayer of the petitioner is reasonable, and that it ought to be granted. By referring to the secretary of lhe board of commissioner. nnder the actof ISH, the committee ha .. o ascertained tht the indemnifiClltion which WR6 allowed to the hold crs of citizens' rigbls in tho purchase of the western territory of the SU.te of Georg;" wae:l.t the rate of twelve and a. h:l.lf cen ts per acre. Tho number of acres caUed for by the scrip held by the petitioner being n ,nl acJU, tho amouot 10 which he 13 clltiUoxI is $8,968 Sit ceuw, f(l' which sUIll they accordingly report a bill. 20.s (JoNoaDS./ No. 733. [21> SI;SSlON . APPLICATION OF INDIANA CLAWING ALL THE PUBLIC LANDS IN TII.A.T STATE. coml1.1NIC~TEB TO .... E SE ..... n: F£IlR(JUY 10, 1829. ReStJl>Xd by (he generalMremUy if ,Ile SUUe if rndimla, That this Stale, being .. sovereign, free, and independent State, b36 the Dxclusive ri ghJ to the soil oud eminent domain of all the unappropriated lando within hcr acknowledged boundar;"", wblch r ight wu ffaerved for her by the State or Virginia, in tbe deed of ceJisiQn of the Northweetern Terrlt<.>ry to the United States, being conOrmed and cat:l.blished by the ar~iclea of wnfeder.cy and the Constitution of ·tho Uni~d St~le.'I. That our sen:>.to!1l in C<.>ngress be instructed, tOO our representatives requested, touseevcry exertion in their power, hy reason and argument, I<.> induce tbe United State. I<.> aclmowlcdgo tbis vested right of tbe States, and plaee ber upon:l.n equal footing witb tbe original State., in e .. ery respect wbatllW .. er, as well in fact as in namc. That hig = llency the governor be requcsted to transmit .. copy of this resolution to each of Our senators and represent:l.ti .. es in Congress, and to e~ch of their e:&:ceHencies the governors of ..,acb of the following States, to wit : Ohio, Illinois, Missouri, Mississippi, Louisiana., and Afaham:l., ,.quostiug them to by it before the leg islatures <.or their «,apecti .. e States for consideration, reqncsting them to adopt similar meaSures If tbey should deem it e,;ped,ent. ISAAC HOWE:, SpecI:er of the HoWie of Jkpmenlati~"eS. M. STAPP, PmidMl of Me &nate. Appro .. ed January g, A. D. 1829. J. BROWN RAY. 20 ... Co"'GllE'"'/ No. 734. ( 2D SESSION. CORRECTION OF ERRcOR IN PATENT FOR BOUNTY LAND. Mr. lUCKS, from OOmruNlc..tUB "«1111£ notls~ 0' R&l"I!E!!E>o"T~nv"" J"~.""oUIY 12, l829. the OOflunittee on the Public Lands, to whom was referred the bi!! frolll tbe Senate, entitled ".An M~ for the relief of Aleunder CllBuingham,n r eported; That though it :l.ppeard by tho letter of the Commiasioncrof tho (kncral Land Office, of the 9th of January last. tht an crror was committed: in making out the grant for the military bounty of Slid Cunningham'. father, whereby ~ qnar~r section of lond Wn$ inJIcrled th:l.t had previously heen panted, yet it is alao 6how .. , and ao uuder6tood, tbat wi, error might now be Wmlcted in the office, and ~ new patent be iSijued for the ~u .. rter aeotion for wbich the warrant is.uedi and the committee do not conJIider tbat ~:notl>et quarter .ecllon ought to be ""leoted or drawn for, espec,aUy ns it appear. from tbe evidence beforo tl>em that the r,erson to be benefited by tile relicf is not the Jl:ranlr:c, or bis heir-at.-iaw, hut an a~igllee <If the tilJe. l'bey ther .. fore recommend the rej~ction of the b,U.