More Related Content
Similar to Performance Apraisal Guide
Similar to Performance Apraisal Guide (20)
More from Lakesia Wright (20)
Performance Apraisal Guide
- 2. Performance appraisal
Setting goals for the appraisal system
Developing criteria for successful performance
Creating metrics for evaluating performance
Selecting reviewees and reviewers
Considering the timing of feedback
Organizing logistics for the report and meeting
Giving candid and constructive feedback
Following up to ensure that the system works
© 2010 Dattner Consulting, LLC
2
- 3. Setting goals
• Developing criteria
Setting goals • Creating metrics
• Selecting reviewees
and reviewers
• Considering timing
• Organizing logistics
• Giving feedback
• Following up
Well-designed Performance Appraisal systems:
• Recognize and record an employee’s contributions
• Give employees useful performance feedback
• Enable a more effective and equitable reward system
• Develop the professional capabilities of employees
• Communicate the organization’s values and culture
• Help the organization make evidence-based, legally
defensible personnel decisions
© 2010 Dattner Consulting, LLC
3
- 4. Setting goals
• Developing criteria
Setting goals • Creating metrics
• Selecting reviewees
and reviewers
• Considering timing
• Organizing logistics
• Giving feedback
• Following up
Evaluation
• Prediction of future performance based on past
performance
• Retention decisions and succession planning
• Compensation
Development
• Assessment for training and development
• Career planning
© 2010 Dattner Consulting, LLC
4
- 5. • Setting goals
Developing criteria
Developing criteria • Creating metrics
• Selecting reviewees
and reviewers
• Considering timing
• Organizing logistics
• Giving feedback
• Following up
Criteria should be:
• Aligned with organizational goals
• Relevant to given roles
• Specific and measurable
• Under employees’ control
• Understood and accepted by participants
© 2010 Dattner Consulting, LLC
5
- 6. • Setting goals
Developing criteria
Developing criteria • Creating metrics
• Selecting reviewees
and reviewers
• Considering timing
• Organizing logistics
• Giving feedback
• Following up
Criteria can be based on:
• Quantitative and/or qualitative factors
• Competencies and/or performance
• Effort and/or results
• Frequency of behaviors
© 2010 Dattner Consulting, LLC
6
- 7. • Setting goals
• Developing criteria
Creating metrics Creating Metrics
• Selecting reviewees
and reviewers
• Considering timing
• Organizing logistics
• Giving feedback
• Following up
Ratings can be on the basis of:
• General or specific standards or expectations
• Improvement on past performance
• Rankings or comparison to others
© 2010 Dattner Consulting, LLC
7
- 8. • Setting goals
• Developing criteria
Creating metrics Creating Metrics
• Selecting reviewees
and reviewers
• Considering timing
• Organizing logistics
• Giving feedback
• Following up
Rating scales differ in terms of:
• Definition of ratings
• Number of possible ratings
• Presence or absence of a midpoint
© 2010 Dattner Consulting, LLC
8
- 9. • Setting goals
• Developing criteria
Creating metrics Creating Metrics
• Selecting reviewees
and reviewers
• Considering timing
• Organizing logistics
• Giving feedback
• Following up
Types of rating scales:
• Graphic Rating Scales
• Ranking
• Forced Distribution
• Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales (BARS)
© 2010 Dattner Consulting, LLC
9
- 10. • Setting goals
• Developing criteria
Selecting reviewees and reviewers • Creating metrics
Selecting reviewees
and reviewers
• Considering timing
• Organizing logistics
• Giving feedback
• Following up
Reviewees can be:
• Everyone in the organization
• Assigned by managers
• Selected by level
• Selected by division or department
• Self-selected
© 2010 Dattner Consulting, LLC
10
- 11. • Setting goals
• Developing criteria
Participants (Continued) • Creating metrics
Selecting reviewees
and reviewers
• Considering timing
• Organizing logistics
• Giving feedback
• Follow up
Reviewers can be designated by:
• Manager
• Human Resources
• Reviewee
© 2010 Dattner Consulting, LLC
11
- 12. • Setting goals
• Developing criteria
Participants (Continued) • Creating metrics
Selecting reviewees
and reviewers
• Considering timing
• Organizing logistics
• Giving feedback
• Follow up
Reviewers can include:
• Reviewee
• Manager
• Peers
• Subordinates
• Clients or customers
© 2010 Dattner Consulting, LLC
12
- 13. • Setting goals
• Developing criteria
Considering timing • Creating metrics
• Selecting reviewees
and reviewers
Considering timing
• Organizing logistics
• Giving feedback
• Following up
Performance can be appraised:
• After each project is completed
• After a milestone is reached
• Quarterly
• Semi-annually
• Annually
© 2010 Dattner Consulting, LLC
13
- 14. • Setting goals
• Developing criteria
Organizing logistics • Creating metrics
• Selecting reviewees
and reviewers
• Considering timing
Organizing logistics
• Giving feedback
• Following up
Data can be gathered by or in:
• Written surveys
• Intranet or internet
• Individual discussions
• Group meetings
© 2010 Dattner Consulting, LLC
14
- 15. • Setting goals
• Developing criteria
Organizing logistics • Creating metrics
• Selecting reviewees
and reviewers
• Considering timing
Organizing logistics
• Giving feedback
• Following up
The process can be coordinated by:
• Employee
• Manager
• Human Resources
• An outside vendor
© 2010 Dattner Consulting, LLC
15
- 16. • Setting goals
• Developing criteria
Giving feedback • Creating metrics
• Selecting reviewees
and reviewers
• Considering timing
• Organizing logistics
Giving feedback
Feedback reports can include: • Following up
• Attributed ratings and comments
• Anonymous ratings and comments
• Statistics and comparisons
• Weighted or unweighted ratings
• By competency
• By reviewer
• Competencies necessary for advancement
© 2010 Dattner Consulting, LLC
16
- 17. • Setting goals
• Developing criteria
Giving feedback • Creating metrics
• Selecting reviewees
and reviewers
• Considering timing
• Organizing logistics
Giving feedback
• Following up
Feedback reports can be (or not be):
• Filtered or summarized by manager
• For an employee’s file
• Shared with others
• Reviewed and approved by others
• Inclusive of tables or graphics
© 2010 Dattner Consulting, LLC
17
- 18. • Setting goals
• Developing criteria
Giving feedback • Creating metrics
• Selecting reviewees
and reviewers
• Considering timing
• Organizing logistics
Giving feedback
• Following up
Feedback is least useful when it is:
• Inaccurate or untrue
• Biased due to favoritism or politics
• Insensitive and unduly critical
• Not specific or actionable
• Constituted by orders or ultimatums
© 2010 Dattner Consulting, LLC
18
- 19. • Setting goals
• Developing criteria
Giving feedback • Creating metrics
• Selecting reviewees
and reviewers
• Considering timing
• Organizing logistics
Giving feedback
Feedback is most useful when it is: • Following up
• Candid and honest
• Specific and actionable
• Based on more than one incident or example
• Based on more than one person’s view
• Framed positively and constructively
• Behaviorally based rather than personality based
• Summarized and integrated into key themes
© 2010 Dattner Consulting, LLC
19
- 20. • Setting goals
• Developing criteria
Giving feedback • Creating metrics
• Selecting reviewees
and reviewers
• Considering timing
• Organizing logistics
Giving feedback
• Following up
Feedback meetings can include:
• Discussion of
• Strengths and development needs
• Compensation
• Team challenges and opportunities
• Development and career planning
• Goal setting for upcoming performance cycle
• Upward feedback
© 2010 Dattner Consulting, LLC
20
- 21. • Setting goals
Following up • Developing criteria
• Creating metrics
• Selecting reviewees
and reviewers
• Considering timing
• Organizing logistics
• Giving feedback
Follow up for the individual can include: Following up
• A written development plan with goals, timelines
and responsibilities
• Progress reports
• Additional meetings with manager
• Training to build on strengths and address needs
• “Stretch” assignments or rotations
• Coaching
• Mentoring
© 2010 Dattner Consulting, LLC
21
- 22. • Setting goals
Follow up • Developing criteria
• Creating metrics
• Selecting reviewees
and reviewers
• Considering timing
• Organizing logistics
• Giving feedback
Follow up for the organization: Following up
• Use aggregated ratings for gap analysis and needs
assessment
• Track performance appraisal statistics to measure the
success of the management development system
• Train new hires and periodically retrain reviewers about
how to evaluate reviewees and give useful feedback
• Periodically survey reviewees and reviewers about the
costs and benefits of the system
• Ensure that the performance appraisal system is in
alignment with evolving organizational and business goals
© 2010 Dattner Consulting, LLC
22
- 23. Conclusion
A well-designed performance appraisal system supports
an integrated human resource strategy which enables the
attainment of organizational and business goals
© 2010 Dattner Consulting, LLC
23
- 24. Ben Dattner, Ph.D.
ben@dattnerconsulting.com
212-501-8945
www.dattnerconsulting.com
© 2010 Dattner Consulting, LLC
24